Loading...
1968-631 rillSOLUTION NO. 6dR-631 A RESOLU'l'ION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CI'l'Y OF ANAHEHl DENYING Vl\RIANCE NO. 2011 \JHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a petition for zoning variance from "illiam Calvin Burch anci Pllyllis A. Burch, owners of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as follows: Lot No. 50 of Tract No. 1931, as shown on a map recorded in Book ..)4 pages 9, 10 and 11 of r.1iscellaneous I.laps, Records of Orange County, California. P<..ND ~vHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim on ~epternber 11 , 19 68 , notice of which said public hearing was duly given as required by law and the provisions of Title :8, Chapter 18.76 of the Anaheim Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, said City Planning Commission after due Inspection, investigation and studies ~ade by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, did adopt Resolution No. PC68-270 granting variance No. 2011, subject to the conditions therein set forth and \VHEREAS, thereafter wi thin twenty-two (22) days from the date of the adoption of said resolution, the City Council dld elect, upon its own motion, to review the action taken by the city Planning Commission in qrantinq said variance and did set a public hearing thereon to be held on the 22nd day of OctoDer , 19 68 , at 7:00 o'clock P.M. in the city Hall in the"city of Anaheii1l,""and notice of such public hearing was duly q_ven as required by law and the provislons of Title 18, Chapter lB.76 of the Anaheim Municipal Code; and -1- WHhREAS, the City council does find that: 1. There is no substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone and denied the subject property. 2. It appears that the subject property can be adequately developed and used under the present zone. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Anaheim that the action of the City Planning Commission granting Variance No. 2011 be, and the same is hereby disapproved, and that the petition for a zoning variance permitting tne keeping of exotic, nonpoisonous reptiles on the property here- inDefore described, be, and the same is hereby denied. THh FOHEGOING RESOLUTION is approved and signed by me t;ns 22nd day of october, 1968. -",,,.. i\'I'TE S T : T. ~{ .1' , , x L2'" .. \ ~ .) '~ItV""CLE Ri~OF /TiiEctfTYOF:-ANAHE~rr): STATE OF CALIFOfu~IA COUNTY OF ORANGE CITY OF ANAHEIr/ 68R-631 -r-:.' . }Q..:22..?~_ ~~ <m.._.2~L~~~__.._____ .!TV.,:, ss. I, DENE M. WILLIAMS, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, GO hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the city Council held on the 22nd da\' of October, 1968. by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COUNCILMEl-.j: KPEIN, SCHUTTE, CLARK & PEBLEY NOES ~ COlJNCILjVIE~\j : DUTTON ABSENT: COUNCILIv1EN; NONE Al\JD I FURTHER CERTIFY that the tlayor of the City of F~aheim approved and siqned said resolution on the 22nd day of October, 1968. IN WITNESS WHEFEOF, I have hereunto set my hand and a ffixed the seal of the City of l\naneim this 22nd day of October, 1968. A 'f"i?EJ C '3? . , 1 ->_ :/\ ,f. ,i1, /1. . ."'. cYTY~cukr 6P'"1-Hi.ctiTV" OP-fu'fAHE-n1 -2-