Minutes-PC 1959/06/29,~-~
:=,
~
f
~
~
~
~ ~
;
VARIANCE N0. 1127 - 1. That the buii~di~g ~~ ea~tt~ nm ae¢a:r~aczce
(Continued) with the ~lans ~~~.
2. Remove and rPr.nns~s.~ =~~A~= m~ ~-r~a~ and
North 5tx~ets. ~emr~ve ~mnl ae~-iusnet arr~ on
Claudina StrPet.
This Resolution wa~ ~a~~.~d 3~y Q'~n==ra~r lfauerhan
and carried.
The vote on the a~rnr~ ~3artfl~ a~s as £mPIlmrs=
AYESs C~MMISSI~= d4flb~1, @8a~sa~. ~risaa,
~Arnsaia~ ~- ~aIli-
NOES: CONIMISSIONE33S: ~~assm_
ABSENTsCONWlISSIOI~f3Sz IID¢s~IDi~ ~ ~aea~a
V0. 1128 - PUBLIC HEARING.. ~TTd'Z~LAT ssy-3~mm~ Eug .~ LL. ancE
JULIA A. VON DER iiEIDE, ~~~fla ~f ~asta Ateea,
California, as (3emer, ~,ae~ g~msss~ece td OPERATE
REAL ESTATE Bl?dIC~RAC~ ~ANID IIII~594~ ~REffEW~E aa the
property descri~ed as ~ aomsit~ si~ ~£ Q'~~**ne
Drive between ~uc3i~l Av~ ~~ S~reet aacF
further described as g637 Q'~~m'+~ @cn~e.. 'fi'ne pro-
perty is present3y classi~'n~ ~-g„ SIIm:'~.E ~Rb~~.~E'
RESIDENTIALo
No one appeared ~~r ar a~ai~ i~e ~~ di tI~is
Variance. THE HEA~?3NG 9~a ~~.
Commissioner kAorris •aff~~sQa9 a&~s~a~iam 1~.. 26~ tkat
Variance Noo 1128 ~e gr~~y ~b,De~Q ~:
1. For a Real £sta~ ~x+a3c~~~ ~ a~+**~ee Esrokerage
Office only.
2. Repair sidewa3~C ~ ~H."sd Wm~moeZ
3. That a 53 faoi ~3a:a~n~w ffam~ it~e ¢e~xter line of
Euclid 3~e given ~m ~~nitp ~ff 64~fie~ ar as
modified by t.~e ~aty ~~aoeeaW ~
4. I'hat any si•gn ~e Il~mma~ ~ 4 ffeefr Eo~g ~ feet. ~
5. That approved ~~~-s~xe~it gn~a"~~.m~ ~e ~taE~ecF ~
as shown on ~i~t gaiare ~s~¢e~eaH.• i
;
This Resolvtion ~nras ~ fl~p ~s~nQmez Iiapgood and ~
carriedo ;
~
The vote on the a~we ~~al~nw a~s as ffmllaa~: +
AYESt COMMISSIONE~?5s Afllat~, ~, If~ner~ans 1[orris,
Saa~as~ 'H~m~r E~m4a2P.
NOES: COMMISSI~s ~. '
ABSENTsCOMIdISSi0t~i35: 3Dne~as ~ ~s_
N0. 1129 - PUBLIC HE74RING. ~EI'~T3Q~p s~a'~$3~ bp ~.Im i[. PON[~ JA.,
905 Pauline Street, Atna~a~m, ~3nff~nap as Ru~Ehori.zed ~
Agent, requesting permma~sn~ t~ ~ i~ DiB~ 2 HIDROOiI ~
UNIT OF 927 squarP ~et a~ae t9s g>a~pea~y ~esc.ri~ as ~
the west side ~a~ ~asii~ S~a~ee~ ,~efaa~a ~rtFe B~Exeet and j
-2- i
~
~_ .._ _..__.. .. _ ~ . _ _ -- ----- - ---- ---~--~-- - -._._ -- - ----- --- ~
e . ~.~ -,~_ -
AA70URI~ED REGULAR MEETING - CITY PLAHIJING CO~1fIS5ID9 -~~a fl%~ -~ds
^? /~ ~ ~ ~
ADJOURNED REGULAR '1~ETING - CITY PLANNING COMMISSION - JUNE 294 1959 - CONTINUEDt
~ VARIANCE N0. 1129 - La Palma Avenue and further descr3bed as 905 Pauline
~ (Continued) Street~ The property is presently classified R-2,
`• TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIALo
i
! No one appeared fos or against the granting of this
Variance. IHE HEARING WAS CI.OSED<
Commissioner Hapgood offered Resolution Noo 266, that
Variance Noo 1129 be granted, subject to:
i
~
jl lo The erection of a house in accordance with the
; plans presented~
VARIANCE N0. 1130
2e That a concrete dr.iveway be put in on PaulinE~ Street.
This Resolution was seconded by Commissioner Allxed
and carriedo
The vote on the above resolution was as followss
AYES: COMMISSIONERSs A1•^ed9 Hapgood, Mauerhan,
Mor:is, Summers, Thompson, Mungall.
NOESs COMMISSIONERS= None.
ABSENT:COMMISSIONERSs DuBois and Gauer.
- PUBLIC HEARINGo PETITION submitted by MATHEW P. LANZA,
224 Napa Place, Fulle.rton, Californ3a, purchasing under
contract, requesting perm.ission to USE PRESENT BUILDING
AS AN OFFICE FOR CON~UCTING REAL ESTATE SALES AND OTHER
RELATED ACTIVITIES S~]CFI AS9 ACCOUNTING, DRAFTING9 REAL
ESTATE ZNSTRUCTION, ETC~i on the property described as
the aast side of Magnolia Avenue betwe+:n La Palma and
Lincoln Avenues and further described as 930 North
Magnolia Avenue. The property is presently classified
R-19 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIALo
Mr~ Ho G. Hillen Jre, of 917 North Magnolia Avenue
appeared before the Commission and inquired what other
uses besides Real Estate would be made of this building.
Inasmuch as the application states that there will be
Real Estate sales and other related activities, such as,
accounting, draft3ng, real estate instruction ete~ He
inquired of the appllcant as to whet`~er a real estate
school would be conducted on the premises9 and the
applicant stated that the instruction he refered to
would bey instruction of his own salesman and that no
school would be conducted for which a fee was charged.
NL•. Hillen stated that he had petition of 20 neighbors
across the street against the granting of this Variance,
but would withdraw this petition if the house is kept
so that it appears as residential and the uses limited
to real estate only with limited signs in front of the
houseo Mre Oo E. Hardacre, 1012 North Magnolia appeared
before the Commission and stated that he had appeared
before the Commission about a month ago relative to the
Variance granted on Lot No. 1 on this tract, but it is
now his feeling that these lots along Magnolia from No.
1 to Noa 5 on this tract should be reclassified for
Commercial use and that he was filing a petition for
same. THE HEARING WAS CLOSEDe
Commissioner Allred offered Resolution No. 2b7 that
Variance Noa 1130 be denied for the reason that it
appears te be premet~~re to pZace these houses i~
commercial uses as he felt that they were still good
-3-
Y
~
f
7
;
;
;
-~;
Y11
~
i
~
~
~ "IIIIYL LYs l~:]7 '~
VARIANCE N0. 1130
(Continu2d)
- residential properties~
This Resolution was seconded by Commissioner Mauerhan
and carried~
The vote on the above Resolution was as ioilowss
AYESs COMMISSIONERS= Allred, Hapgood, Mauerhan9 Morris9
Swmners, Thompson, Mungall.
NOES: COMMISSIONERSs Noneo
ABSENTsCOMMISSIONERS: DuBois and Gauera
VARIANCE N0. 1131
- PUBLIC HEARINGo PETiTION submitted by BUTLER-HARHOUK
CONSTRUGTION COMPANY~ 9741 Lincoln Avenue, Anaheim,
California, purchasing under contract, requesting
permission to WANE MINIMUM FRONT YARD REQUIREMENTS
on the property described as the north side of Broadway
Street between Magnolia and Dale Avenues and further
described as Tracts 2832 and 2938. The property is
presently classified R-1, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL.
Mr. Merrill Butler9 representing the Butler-Harbour
Construction Company, appeared before the Commission
and stated that the reason for asking for a waiver of
the front yard set backs was to provide a greater
depth of rear yard for the installation of pools for
outdoor living and that a varation of set backs would
add interest and variety to the proposed development.
No one appeared in opposition to the granting of
this Varianceo THE HEARING WAS CLOSED.
Commissioner Mungall offered Resolution Noa 268
that any dwellings erected on Broadway conform to
code requirements of 25 foot front yard set backs, but
that waivers be allowed on the interiar lots as shown
on the plot plan presented. This motion was seconded
by Commissioner Allred and carriedo
The vote on the anave resolution was as followss
AYES: COMMISSIONHRS: Allred, Hapgood, Mauerhan9 Morris~
Swmners, Thompson, Mungallo
NOESs COMMISSIONERSs None.
ABSEMsCOMMISSIONERSs DuBois and Gauer.
VARIANCE N0. 1132 - PUBLIC HEARING. PETITION Submitted by PARK VILLAGE
ESTATES, A CORPORATION, Box 602, Maheim, Califor.nia, as
Lessee, requesting permission to CONSTRUCT A 12` x 21'
TEMPORARY DIRECIIONAL SIGN on the property descr:bed as
the southwest side of the Santa Ana Fre2way, approx3mately
125 feet south of the Orangethorpe overpass bridge. The
property is presently classified M-1, LIGHT MANUFACT'URING•
Mro Paul Pierce of Park Village Estates appeaxed uefore
the Commission and stated that they had a sign location
, south ~f the present location, but Foster and Kleiser
had completely blocked out their sign and the orsly
way they could make their sian visible would be to
raise it higher in the air, inasmuch as they nad a
sign at this location, which was prior commitment, it
was felt by the Commis:ion that the removal of this
sign to the new loca+ion v,ou~d be allowableo Due to
the fact that the Santa Ana Freeway is to become a
landscaped freeway and that all advertising signs
-4-
i
i
~,
_..__~_... . _ _..___ .___ _-.___
_- -- -__- - _ - __._._ _ __ .._, .
, . ~~.. ~_
. ;~
j
~
~
:~
~
A61Ti[I[iRT1FF1 R~li 6A y¢~r~, - CITY PLANtiING COMMISSiON - JUNE 29, 1959 ~ CONTINUED:
Y~a~ N0. I132
(~imnedj
- must be takert down by October 109 1959, this wuuld only
permit the sign for a period of approximately 3 monthso
This 3 month period would be satisfactory to Mr. Piezce,
he stated. THE fiEARIR'G 1NAS CLOSED~
A Resolution was offered by Commissioner Mauerhan,
seconded by Gommissi.oner Summers, that Variance Noo
1132 be denied.
The vote on the above Re5olLtion was as follows:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Mauerhar end Summers~
NOESs COMMISSIONERSt Allred, Hapgood, Morrisa Thompson~
Mungallo
ABSENTsCOMMISSIONERSs DuBois and Gauere
This resolution did not carryo
A second Resolution Noo 269 was offered by Commissioner
Morris, seconded by Commiss~oner Hapgaod and carried
that Variance No~ 1132 be granted until October 10,
1959 sub~ect to the nine conditions established by
the City Council for directional signs.
The vote on the above Resolution was as followss
AYES: CO~NMISSIONERSs Allred, Hapgood, Morris, Thompson,
Mungall~
NOHS: COMMISSIONERS: Mauerhan and Swnmers.
ABSENT:COMMTSSIONERSs 17uBois and Gauero
V~F6~ 1~. 1133
- PUBLIC HEARINGo PETITION submitted by MARGO INVESTMHNT
COMPANY and NIGEL INVESTMENT COMPANY, 144 ;outh La Brea
Avenue, Los Angeles 36, California, as Ow:iers, re-
questing permission TO MAKE AN .•8 FF.ET ADJl7STI~NT IN
WIDTHS OF LOTS 24 thru 39 INCLUSIVc OF TRACi 2~489 on
the property described as the north side of Stella
Avertue between Ninth Street and Janette Lenea The
property is presently classified R-1 SIidGLE FAMILY
RESIDENfIAL~
. ~~
A representative of the Margo Investment Company
appeared before the Commission and stated that on
account of the type house desired to put on these
lots, it would be necessary to take .8 of a foot
from every other lot in order to have the required 5
foot side yardo There was a q~e~tlon among the
Commissioners to whether or not a new tract map should
be filed showing these changed lot dimensions, but it
was believed that ~~ith any lot they sold to a customer,
they would have to record same by a meets and bounds
description which t.hey stated that they were ready to
do. THE H£ARING WAS CLOSEDa
Commissioner Hapgood offered a Resolution No~ 270,
that Variance No. 1133 be 9ranted permitting an
.8 of a foot ad~ustment on every other lot between
Lot 24 and 39 of Tract Noo 24$90
The vote on this Resolution was as follows:
AYES: COMMISSI~NERSs Allred, Hapgood, Mauerhan, ~
Morris, Swnmers, Thompson9 Nf-uigalle ;
NOESs CO-ANISSIONERSs Noneo a
A3SENTsCOMMISSIQNEIt.': DuBois and Gauer, ~
This resolution was seconded by Commissioner Morris and ~
carried~
-5- ~
~
~
~
~ __,..__ _.._. _. _. . .
. .. .
_ _. _ _ ----_ -- .. ---- _--__.--..._--.. ~
. ~--_.__. .____-__
~ ~ ~
i
t
^ ` _ ~ '~
_ :~ .
_ . , - - , b~. - __ .~a, ..~ .~:.,:_
~
~
~ ~~
;
AA7(~JR~D R~.AR 1~TL~ - CI'YY PLANL~tIIW COMhtISSiOri - JUNE 29 1959 - CONTINUEDt
VABIAt~(~ HD. 1134 - PUHLIC HEARIIdGo PETITION subm3tted by DONAL~ Fo KREBS,
814 Modena Street, Maheim, Califor.nia, as Owner9
requesting permission to WANE HEIGHT RESTRICTION FOR
FENCE TO ENCLOSE SWIMMING POOL IN FRONT YARD on the
property described as Lot 79, Tract 2296 and fur~her
describad as 814 North Modena Streeto The property is
presentlX classified R-19 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIALo
Mr. Do Fo Krebs, as applicant appeared before the
Commission and stated that there w~s no room in
his rear yard to place a swimming pool on account of
the 5 foot pole line easemertto This means that the
pool will be placed in the side yard with an en-
croachment into the front yard of 5~ feet w3th a
proposal to bui?.d a 6 foot fence which will encroach
8~ feet ir.to the front yard~ THE HEARTNG WAS CLOSEDo
CQmmissioner Allred offered a Resolution Noa 271 that
Variance Noo 1134 be granted, this motion was seconded
by Commissioner Mauerhan and carriedo
The vote on the above Resol~~tion was ac followss
kYES: COIKMISSIONERS= Allred, Mauei..an, Morrls'
Thompsono
!VOES: COlANISSIONERS: Hapgood, Summ?rs, M,:ngallo
RBSENTsCOh9NISSIONERSs 1TuBois and Gauero
SF"tCIAI- 11SE PER6~T I~O. 41 - PIISLIC HEARII3Go PETI7TON submitted by CALIFORNIA
SPRAY CF~MICAL CORPORATION, P. Oe Box ~819 Whittier,
California, as Lessee9 requ?~~ing permission to
ADD FACILITIES FOR BLENDING AGRICUI.TURAL DUSTS on the
pxoperty described as the east side of Haster Street
between Katella and Cerritos Avenues and it~.rther
described as 10962 Haster Streeto xhe propcrty is
presently classified R-A9 REStDENTIAL AGRICUiTURALo
A representative of the Californ3a Spray Chemicai
Corporation appEared before the Commission and
stated inasmuch as their sales for ti~is type of
agricvltural dust was in Orange County they were
maving this facility irom their Whittier plant~ The
eauipment now being used for this wor.k at the Whittier
location is author3zed by the Los Angeles County Air
Fnllution Control District under permit No~ 1349 and
Mr 11 consist of blending dust based chemicals with
cla;• fillerse All of the base materials are formaulated
at thc Richmond, California P.lant and would be 6hipped
to the Haster Street address f~r blendingo These
chemicals are now zandled and blended at the Whitti:r
Iocation and are at present being trucked to Haster
Street for redistribution~ The other business at
this location would be the same as is presently being
conducted e 7IiE Fi~eARING WA3 CLOSED.
Commissioner Mauerhan offered a Resolution No~ 272, that
Special Use Permit No. 41 be granted, sub~ect to:
le The obt~ining from •the Orange Count~ Air Pollution
District clearance for this type of work~ .
2. That there be a d~dication to the City oi Anaheim
of 4F feet from the center line of Haster Street.
-6-
~
a
~
._.,::. ......:.: .. ... ....,.. ...~.__..._~.-------
_ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETIt~i - CITY PLANNING CUi~IIISSIOd~i - Ji!!iE 29 1959 -(~I~iIINUEDs
SPECIAL USE PERMIT N0. 41 - 3' e terhlineo£a~atellatAvenue io the Citymofhe
(Continued) ~ny~ ,
o~m,
4. That street impzovement Plans and the installa- ~
~ i tion of all improvements in acco=dance with
~ approved standard plans on file in the offi.ce of 5
~ the City Eng=neer be in~talled on both streetso -
} {
~ g, I'}-e payment of 52.00 per front foot €o: street i
~ • lighting purposes nn both s~reets. ;
~ This Resolution was seconded by Co~issioner Hap9ood 't
~ and carriedo
~ The vote on the ai~we Reso1L-iion Kas as follows:
~ pygS, 0~9J1iSSi0NERS: Allred, HaP9ood~ Mauerhan, Swmners, ;.
~ ltungall. ?
~ NOES: ~ISSIfl1~RS~ L~:1YS35 aixi ThomQs~n.
~ ABSFNT:CAA9~6ISSIOHERS: A.~is and Gauer. ,
3 SPECiAL USE PERMIT N0. 42 - PUBLIC HEARING• Pc""i'3?I02D su6mitted by MRS• EF-ZZ~~TH
~ . LANCASIER, 1336 Atlantic Bovlevard, Long Beach,
California, as Oemer, requesting pe=mission to
CONSTRULT D~ELI7JC~ 65 SPACE TRA~I~R PARK 1fIFH RECREATION
V~ + BUILDIIdG, Sll'I~dIt~ PO[N-, PLAY RREAS A~ID UIILITY BUILDINCS
~ I on the psoperty descr:bed as thP x~est side of Stanton
i Avenue be'Meen Lincoln Aven:.~ and Orange Avenue and
~~ ' further described 235 South Stanton Rvenue. The property
~ ; is presently classified R-A; RESZI~NTIAL AGRICULTURALo
A. I. Switzer appsared fo: the applicant and
Mr q'
.
described the plan presented £or a deluxe trailer park S
with an apartment far the manegQr and recreation
Qets to be 30 feet in width and
t
Th ~
r
e s
facilities.
with 69 spaces in 5~26 acres, srhich means that will be y
~
about 12 trailer spaces per acre. The gresent orange
d as fas as po=si~le and other
i
i t
ne
nta
trees will be ma
landscaping will be p.-ovided. Yhe total property to ~
be used for the park rrill be fenced and the acreage at &
the rear will still be ;cept =n c'. t,x^.:s. IlRrso Pfeil,
sion
i
C ;
s
omm
3064 West Lincoln A/er.ue appea~ed befoze the
d that as the oo~ner of the parcel to the
t
t
d ~
e
a
an
s
north and mest of the subject prcperty which they were _#
'
still using for citrus, she rrished to be assured that
ark xrould be comPl~tely fenced. Mr. Switzer
iler
t
h •
~
p
ra
e
~
again reiterated ~hat there xould be adequaie fencing ;
around the park composed of a chain Iink fence, 6 foot 4
in height. A property ~asner at 226 South Gran~l Avenue
ear of the propertY was interested
th :,
?
e r
backing up to
in what was goingi to happen to the rear 700 feet~ It
~ ~
is proposed at the present time to iceep this as a ,
'
citrus grovee 1!r• Snitzer said they ~11 want a sign
ot entrance co.^~idor Khich ~rould be
40 f ;
o
in the
attractive and not be detrimental to ot':+er prorArties {
in the area. TH£ H~J4RIt~ ~IAS CLOSm• '
Commissioner Siafiners offered a Resolution No. 273, that ~
Special Use Permit Hn. 42 be apprwed subjec~ to the
plans presented. Tt~e Co~iss£on did not go along i
with the xeLo~ec~dations of the Engineering Committee ,
inasmuch as the £ront of the propertY wzs not presently i
being develaped and it Kas felt that these improvements
should be incladed +M1fien that portion of the proPer'kY ~
was developed. '
,I -7_ ~.
~
~
1 ~
..~° .
-- ...__. ... _ _._. ._--- __ -- -.
.~L'- ~ _ ~-- _ ~_
~
~
AATOURNED REGULAR MEETII~i - CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ~• JUVE 29. 1959 - CONTINUED:
SPECIAL USE PERMIT N0. 42 - This Resolution was seconded by Commissioner Allred ~nd
(Continued) carried.
The vote on the above Resolution was as follows:
AYESs COMMISSIONERSs Allred, Hapgood, Mauerhan9 AAorri~9
Summers, Thompsono
NOESs COMMISSIONERSs Mungallo
ABSENTsCOMMISSI0NER3s DuBois and Gauera
SPECIAL USE PERMIT N0. 43 - PUBLIC HEAi?ING> PETITION submitted by NORiHROP
CORPORATION, as Owner, c~o Merrill E. Skilling,
500 East Orangethorpe Avenue, Anaheim, California,
as Authorized Agent, xeq~iesting permission to
MpNUf'k,CfURE COUNTERMEASUkE5~ ROCI~TS AND ~EI.ATED
OPERA'iIONS on the property described as the south
side oi Orangethorpe Avenue betweer. L~mon Street and
Raymon@ Avenue and further described as 500*East
Orangethorpe Avenueo The property is presently
classi"~ed M-~, HEAVY MANUFACTURINGo
Mr. M. Eo Skilling appeared for the Northrop
Corporation and ~tated that the present request
was for the underground testing and laboratory of
countermeasures, rockets and related operations.
Mr. Skilling described the countermeasures rockets
as a decoy rocket of small type 3 to 5 feet in lengti~
and 4 to 5 inches in diameter. I'he propellant is
not explosive, but inflamable and is started with a
detonator. There will be 4000 square feet in the
complete set of buildings which ~vill be underground.
One building will be used for the storage of 900
pounds of propellant and not over 100 pcunds of
detonatcr capso These tests w311 be static and fired
in a building underground and all tests will be
conducted under the safety requirements of Army
Ordinance and ±he State of Californiaa The noise
created at the sitz w3.11. be zoproximately 65 decibels
which is about the sound of a truck going by on a
highway. At the frontage on Orangethorpe, the noise
would cotisiderably less than 85 decibelse These
tests will be periodic and not continous, as different
propellants are teated and formulae revised from time
to time to obtain greater efficiency.
Mr. Pinkam as representat3ve of a property owner on t~e
north side of Orangethorpe Avenue questioned v+hether.
the noise created would disturb re..idents on thet
s3de of the Avenue or whether being so close to the
Ri.verside Freeway whether 3t would disturb people
riding on this Freewayo Mro Skilling did not
believe that the noise would bother at either of
these points. THE HEARING WAS CLOSED.
Commissioner Mungall offered Resolution No. 274,, t~at
Special Use Permit No. 43 be approved~ subject tos
1. Maintaining the noise level at the firing si't~ ta
85 decibelso
2. Erection of :acilities in accordance with planse
This R9solution was seconded by Commissioner Mauerhan
and carried.
»~.~,~;
~
f
K
~
* ''+~..
- ~~
-8-
~
i
~
. ~ ~ ~
Y'
~
~
~
ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING - CITY PLANNING COMMISSION - JUNE_2~_1959 - CONTINUEDt
SPECTAL USE PERMIT N0. 43 -?he vote on the above Resolut3on was as follows:
(Continued) AYESt COMMISSIONERSs Allred, Hapgood, Mauerhan, Morris,
Summers, Thompson, Mun9a11.
NOESs CO~MiIISSIONERS: Nonee
ABSENT= COMMISSIONERS: DuBois and Gauero
RECLASSIFICATIOAI N0. - PUBLIC HEARING. At;the request of the City Council
F-56-57-?42 PETITION submitted by ANGELO Jo SCAGLIONE, 9102
Lincoln Avenue, ?~naheim, California, as owner is
being readvertised, requesting that the property des-
cribed as, Parcel 1; The north 5 acres of the west
20 acres on the norrh one-half of the norttr~vest
quarter of Section 18, Township 4 South, Range 10
West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, EXCEPTING
THEREFP.OM the north 190 feet, ALSO EXCEPTIhTG Tt~RE-
FROM the west 418097 fFet. EXCEPTING ALSO the north
29017 feet be reclassified from C-1, NEIGHBORHOOD
COMMERCIAL tc R-19 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENfIAL.
This reclassification was returned by the City
Council to the Planning Commission to have them
consider the rear portion of this property for R-1
instead of C-1 as presently classifiedo
No one appeared before the Commission relative to
this reclassification. THE HEARING WAS CLOSED.
The drawing presented by the applicant does show a
new three bedroom home on this property and existing
home located near Lincoln Avenue which will be moved
to the rear of the propertyo On the drawing it shows
a street at the south side of the property, but none
of thts street is provided by the applicant from his
property, it would appear that he would have to dedicate
a half street of 30 feet, with this in mind a resolution
was offered by Commiss3oner Svmmers No. 275 that
Reclassification No. F-56-57-~2 be recommended to the
City Council for reclassification from C-1, NEIGHBORHOOD
!.N~IN~RCIAL to R-1, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL for a depth
of 120 feet from the south 2ine of the property and
that no building be erected less than 55 feet from the
south line of this property. This resolution was
seconded by Commissioner Hapgood and carried.
The vote on the above Resolution was as followss
AYESs COMMISSIONER5: Allred, Hapgood, Mauerhan9 Morris,
Summersy Thompson, Mungall.
NOESs CONGAISSIONERSs NonQ.
ABSENT:CONMISSIONERSs DuBois and Gauere
RECLASSIFICATION N0.
- •57-58-1
PUBLIC HEARING. At the request of the City Council
PETITION sube~itted by CL~;RENCE W. RAINS, 5601 Bradford
Avenue, Placentia, California, as owner is L~eing re-
advertised, requesting that the property described
as all that certain land situoted in the State of
California, County of Orange, City of Anaheim, des-
cribed as follows: The south 430 feet of the east
half of the southwest quarter oi the southwest quarter
of Section 12, Iownship 4 South, Range 11 4Yest, S. B. B.
and M., described as co~mr~encing at a point in the south
line o£ sa3d Section, north 89° 41° east 662.75 feet
-9-
_- -- . . _ ..__ _ _. _. .__ _ _._ _ _ __........
.- . ,
. __ - , --- -
~
,,.~ :...
~
~
P~B B~:AR I~EfIl~1G - CITY PLANNING COINMISSION - JUNE 29, 1959 -_ CONTINUEDt
~'FCATI~I - from the ~outhwest corne: thereof; thence north
D~_ F-Sa s8-Z 0° 13° west 1328s09 feet to a point; thence north
~~;,, ~j 89° 4Y° 10° east 6b3e44 feet to a point; thence south
0° 14' 45° sast 1328.05 feet to a point; thence south
89° 41° west 662.75 feet to the place of beginning.
EXC,EIyiING. TIiEREFROM the west 330 feet. ALGC c:.YCEPTING
7HEREFROM the south 40 feet, be reclassified froi~.
R-A, RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL to C-1~ NEIGHBORHOOD
CONIM"eRCIAL.
This reclassification was returned to the Planning
Commission for a rehearing by the City Council on
account of a faulty desc:ription in the former ad-
vertisement.
No one appeared for or against the granting of this
reclassification. THE HEARING WAS CLOSED.
Commissioner Mauerhan offered Resolution No. 276,
recommending to the City Council that the subject
property for a depth of 430 feet north from Lincoln
Avenue be reclassified to C-19 Neighborhood Commercial,
sub~ect to:
1. The filing of C-1 Deed Restrictions approved by
the City Attorneya
2. That all engineering requirements of the City of
Anaheim, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks,
street ~rading and paving, drainage facilities or
other pertinent work be complied with as required
by the City Attorney.
3. That a 90 day time limit be set for the accomplish-
ment of the above conditions.
~ECATION N0.
F-5ff-54-65
At the request of the City Council PETITION s~bmitted
by ROHERT Po RALLS, 9401 Blanche, Garden Gcove9
California, as owner is being readvertised, requesting
that the property descr3bed as all that certain land
situated in the City of Anaheim, described as followss
Portion of Section Nine, Township 4 South, Range 10
West~ S. B. B. & Md described as followss Commencing
at a point 50 feet south of thc north line of said
section, therefore 50 feet south of the center line of
La Palma, 405.69 feet west of the center line of La
Palma at the ~unction of West Street as shovun on the
map of a section of said section made for F. W.
Fleischmann„ and filed in Book 1, Page 56 of Record of
Surveys in the office of the County Recorder of Orange
County, California. Proceeding Southward 674~8 feet to
the North line of the County Flood Cont~ol Right-of-Way,
as recorded in the Orange Connty Flood Control Right-of-
way Carbon Creek Channel - B-1, Map 10; thence 631.4
feet northeast along the north line of said ~lood
Con•,. .t Right-of-way, ending at a point 33 feet from
the mid line of West Street; thence north 224.2 feet
to the point 50 feet south of the center line of
La Palma Avenue; thence para12e1 to the center line of
La Palma Avenue westward for a distance of ~83.1 feet
to the point of beginning. Said property is located
at the southwest corner of West Street and La.Palma
Avanue in Anaheim, California, the corner having the
address of 1100 West La Palma be reclassified #ro~
R-A. RESIDL-NTIAL AGRICULTURAL to C-1, NEIGIiBORH00D
COMMERCTAL.
-10-
:~~
~
_
~
3
i
_ _..-----._..._.
` ~ . __.. . . . ___.
~ ~ ~ ~
i
ND. ~-~8-~
~C~ti~~
_ ~~ ,~.,-r~~~~~~ ~5 returned by the City
ri*+..~-FF ta ~~s~ag Co~ission on account of a
~~g ~*'~~ af the praperty and wras consequently
~~ €~r a =eF~ax~ng on this date.
:?--=-===rn~~ ~mgalL affere~ Resolution No~ 277~ that
~ c_h~~aa ~-~+~Rd ta the City Cotmcil that
~*~ =n~ af eaicE graperty Iying north of the
~ F*era af ~(tr~nge Co~u-ty Flood Control Channel
~~ ta ~i, Neigit~rhaod Commercial upon the
=Trr~,..:,+.t c~rFitiaas.
r_ zf~t ~~I~age constructed on the sub~ect
~a~rt7F ~L ~e 2~ited to one story in
F~=~~
~~ ti~ awaer af subject property place of
zec~ ~~~•-~ Citg of Artaheim C-1 Deed Restrictions
~¢veef Fig tis~ Citjr Attorney, which restrictions
~IL E~t ~he ~I uses of the property to
~c~Fq ~r~I ¢ff~ces, professional offices,
_ -. fFaxer shops, coffee shop and rest homes.
3. I~ ~FS agertiarte uaith relation to the proposed
caif~ ~m~ tv T~ Iocated o~ the sub3ect property
~ c~rie~ oa ~sithzn the confines of the building.
~~ ~II ~giaeeriag =equirements of the City of
`T.'~-.- ~Lang ~ F~ma Avenue and West Street, such
as c~ ~ g~ctters= sidewalks, street grading
~¢ ~ri~ ~inaqe facilities or other pertinent
~ic L~ cam~tFie~ urith as reqaired by the City
~~T ~cf fct accardance with pland and specifica-
~~ fil~ aa the office of seid City Engineer.
~„ i~ tis~ w~er a€ the ~ubject property construct
~~ faat ~~+_~ ~~ along the xesterly property
FTesr~
6., I~c ~ rn~r ~f the subject property obtain from
C~ac~ Crnmt7~ FIQacE Cantrot District and furnish to
~• ~~ ~ facati.ad arnF description of the
~~~xea tQ 5e taken for the Flood Control
~7rmrrnaT ~
_~
~
i
~,_ ~ ~g ~scE ~ ~riwe accesses immediately ad3acent
~~'~cg~ Ccunty Flood Control Channel conform to
~~•,~r*+= af the City Engineer and that all
gZ~ t~*a~*~ 6e~ approved by said City Engineer.
~~t o~,=a~ 2, 4, 6 and 7 mentioned above be com-
~.E2 o~~n ~ perio~ af 90 days from date hereof or
~~~~ ti~e ~s the City Council may grant.
;~_ ~o~ v~ ~coRdec! by Co~issioner Summers and
e=.,-~~,€_
~•c¢t~ c~!t tbe ~rnre =esn' ;rtion was as follows:
~ ~: ~Ired, Hapgood, Mau4rhan, Morris,
Su~ers, Thompson, Mungall.
~ ~: Koae.
~ : DuBois and Ganer.
; ~[~r_a~rrx~~ _ ~-~ ~au~- p~iFZON submitte3 by R. E. OSTROOT,
Np~ ~~~~ r~ i~~ ~FF HaaK£, Rn~hein~, i.alifornia, as Owner,
;; ~~=~ EscsEae~*_ing Compaay, as Authorized Agent, re-
;' ~-F~ ~;, r~e Fraperty descrited as being a parcel
~~~ ~ -2F-
_ . . _. - _. ~ ---~----- .,-.. . _.
~
__
~
r
s ~ '~
~JJDIt~D ~ ~ - ~ ~"~~~ Cf~c - 3U1'~ 29. I959 - CONTINUED:
~c
I
i
,.~;;..~~~ ~.~„•,•.:.;.,,,,~.~;;._.;~~.~.,~s:~:~ °c_.r.':..•:ec:-.^s: _~n[s sa r~~sn~e3s.~!e:m!+ssra'~. .... . . -=.._
~' .. ~ ~ ~
ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING - CITY PLANt~ING COMIdI55I~N - J~IIC~ ''c'9. Il~ -~~=
RECLASSIFICATION - on the east ~ide o~' ~na3 S~r ~~ ffixtft of
N0. F-58-59-92 Ball Road be rec3as~i~d ~m}3-W, ~SII~'~ar: _
(Continued) AGRICULIVRAL to $-3, ~?~T~* ~.~ ~'aPn_.~~T"~~r ~
On account o~ thi.~ rezl~~i~n~ ~r`.m~s r~£erae~ 6ack
to the Co~i.ssion ~ 3~ ~i3~ Q~mIl ~ a*r+r*+++~~a- ~
tion, Vice Chairman ~~Ile~l a~-tt nr~r trhe i
ordiriance the ~o~i~i~ aro Il~ ~cH ~~+~tg ta act upon ~
this applicati7n ina~mvz~ ~~e g~n~ ~£ 4m ~~ Itac~ ~
elapsed since ~e si~ ~ ~ne ~sIlmx_ G~=~Tan~r ±
Hapgood moved t3~at ~ s,a].~ ~ tt~e i~o~ Cfr~T-marr 6~ ;
approved and adopt~~l ~g t~ ~ssna~ ~ t~-t th~
~ application bF ~DTW3S~.'Il S:J SI~ ~L'~ ~''rnir.c-TT ~~~ ;
recommendation in ~zr.nr~d~n~ er~~ t~ ~iaus ~c.tioc~ i
taken by the Comm~s~ian ~nu i3~~ ~mu=~arne
This motion was s~~ond~.sl ~g'C~~c*~~a AIlP.x~cE aa~
car3ried. .
AATOURNMENT: - The meeting adjourne~7 at ~i:~D m'~Il~c P,A~. ~nti.L
Tuesday July 7~ 3959 ~3 ~aD u~=A.,~~~c P.A~. f~ cvr*+Tm~R
the items on the Agenda ~t w~~ m~ c~c7iv~~ a~t this
meeting.
~s~tl.~u~~ . "ttte¢~~,
~
~
'n y
~ e 71110 .W~'-~t. ~ ,- ~"~y
-12-
i
i ,``