Minutes-PC 1960/02/01• _ y - = r 1zf ;
~ .
. ;~.;~
;., .
,~."_" '°'°°" '.
~ ~ _ .,.:~ . ',~,
- 1
City Hall I
February 1, 1960 ,
i Anaheim, California
REGULAR Iu~ETING OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR A~ETING - A Re9ular Meeting of the City Planning Commission was called to
order at 2s00 0'Clock P. M. by Chairman Gauer, a quorum being present.
PRESENI - Chairman Gauer, Commissionerss Allred, Marcoux, Mauerhan, Morris,
Mun9a11, and Summers. Commissioner DuBois entered the me~ting
at 2=10 0'Clock P.M.
ABSENi - Commissioner Hapgood.
MINUTES .- The minutes of the Regular Meeting of January 18, 1960, were
approved with the following corrections: Page 3- under
Reclassification No. F-59-60-69, the applicant, Mr. Loyd E. Mount
stated that with the prices of property now selling in the area
the owners could afford to raze their present structures and
erect new buildings. Also, Noo 3- Repair and replace sidewalk
and curb as directed by the Public Works Department.
VARIANCE No. 119I - PUBLIC HEARINGo PETITION submitted by THOMAS H. PURCELL,
217 Monument Street, Anaheim, California,requesting permission
to REDUCE ~NT YARD SETBACK i0 15' IN ORDER TO CONSTRUCT A
FENCE TO ENCLOSE SWIMMING POOL on the property described as
a parcal on the west side of Monument St. between Broadway and
Lincoln Ave., also described as 217 Monument St. The property
is presently classified as R-1, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL.
Mr. Charles Newberry, 203 Monument St., and also spoke for
Mr. Crackenbush, 220 Monument St., Anaheim, California. He
spoke against +_he request. He felt that the applicant knew
what type lot he was purchasing and should not be allowed to
have this application granted. He fe:t that the Variance should
have been applied for before the swimming pool was built. This
person lives across the street.
Mr. Purcell did not speak in rebuttal. THE HEARING WAS CLOSED.
No property in the area had more than a 5' encroachment. This
is the most that has been granted for a swimming pool.
Commissioner Morris offered Resolution No. 156, Series 1959-60,
that Variance No. 1191 be denied. No one seconded the motion.
The possibility of a 5' rather than a 12' encroachment was
considered.
Mr. Purcell said that oniy the posts set 15 ft. back from the
sidewalk were in at this time.
There was no discussion.
This motion failed to carry.
Commissioner Mungall offered Resolution No. 156, Series 1959-60
that Variance No. 1191 be granted, subject to:
_. 5' encroachment in the front yard.
This resolution was seconded by.Co~nissioner Mauerhan and carried.
ihe vote on the above resolution was as follows=
A~Ss CObMISSIONERSs Allred, DuBois, Gauer, Marcoux, Mauerhan,
Morris, Mungall and Summers. ~ '
NOESs (AMMISSIONERS: None. ~
ABSENTs COMMISSIONERSs Hapgood. ~
-l-
~.,
~
--~ ----_..., -- ___.
~
REGULAR MEETING - CITY PLANNING COMMISSION - FEBRUARY 14 1960 - CONTINUHD:
VARIANCE No. 1192 - PUBLIC HEARING. PETITION submitted by IRVING L. NOVEMBER and ;
RUSSELL LoCASCIO, 742 N. Resh Streety Anaheim, California requesting ~
permission to WAIVE 150' REQUIREMENT FOR SEPARATION BEIWEEN R-1
PROPER?Y AND R-3 PROPERTY, on the property described as a parcel
on the north side of Crescent Avenue between Euclid Avenue and ~
Chippewa Street, also described as Lots 6-10 or ?ract No. 3398.
The property presently classified as R-3, MULTIPLE FAINILY R~SIDENTIP.L.
Mr. R. Garfield, 1768 Crescent, across the street from the proposed
buildingo He was against the two story building. He says that
many of the patios would be facing this two story building and
would take away their privacy, even though there is a wall. He is
not against the waiver ~ust the two story building.
Roy Murro, 1782 Crescent and Nirs. Bradley, 1778 Crescent, Anaheim,
California were also against it.
Mro November stated that their patios were facing Crpscent Avenue
where there is a lot of tra#fic which would mean that their
privacy wouid be lost.
Mr. Garf~eld said the lots have all been built 4' above the level
of Crescent Avenuee
The plans were shown and Mr~ Garfield said they looked all right.
TtiE HEARING WAS CLOSED.
Commissioner Mauerhan ~ffer~ed Resolution No. 157, S~ries 1959-60
that Variance No. lly2 be granted, seconded by Cohunissioner A11red
and carrieuo ?he vote on the above resolution was as follows=
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, DuBois, Gauer, Marcoux, Mauerhan,
Morris, Mungall, Summers.
NOESs COMMIS~IONERS: None.
ABSENTs COMIKISSIONHRS: Hapgood.
VARIANCE No. 1193 - PUBLIC HEARING. PETITION submitted by PRESYDENT NIANOR~ 1798 W. Orange
Avenue, Anaheim, California, requesting permission to WAIVE MINIMUM
LOT FRONTAG~ REQUIREMENTS.on the property described as a parcel
110' x 67' on the west side of Loara Street 660' south of the
center line of Broadwayo The property is presently classified as
R-A, RESIDENTIAL - AGRICIJLTURALa
Mra McDaniel represented the applicant, and asked if the Tentative
Map would be considered at tF~is ii:~e. The lot in question is at
the street entrance. The probiem is to get the street out to Loara.
The developer is willing tc~ make all the necessary street dedications
and provide street improvements. However, we would like to know
if it will be considered as part of the tract or not. This is the
reason for the request.
Mr. Nichols spoke for Mrs. England and Mrs. Chaffey. They have the
property north of the property, zoned R-3 and no outlet for the street.
It is not developed yet. It seems that an outlet would be from ~
Loara. If tk~ey do so ~hey will want an outlet next to this property.
They would be wflling to g3ve ha2f a streeto
Mr. McDaniel -"In regar~+s to participating in half a street, we
would prefer not to front on R-1 houses an R-3 development. These
lots if they front like this-we would have trouble in financing
on F. H. A."
-2-
V ~,/ ~ .
7 . . . '~ . . ~ ' ~-~ -
I
. I ',: j •
~
~~
~
REGULAR MEETING - CITY PLANNING COMMISSION - FEBRUARY_1, 19~50 - CONTINUED:
VARIANCH No. 1193 - THE HEARING WAS CLOSED.
(CONTINUED)
Commissioner Allred offered Resolution No. 198, Series 1959-60
that Variance No. 1193 be granted.
The resolution was seconded by Commissioner DuBois and carriede
The vote on the above rasolution was as followss
AYESs COIapIIISSIONERSs Allred, DuBois, Gauer, Marcoux, iNorris,
Mauerhah, Mungall, Su~ers.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERSs Hapgood.
TENTATIVE MAP OF - A Tentative Map of Tract I~o. 3673 was presented to the Coumission.
TRACT No. 3673 This tract is located 660' south of Broadway on `the west side of
Loara Streeto The subdivider is PRESIDENi MANOR, 1798 W. Orange
Avenue, Anaheim, California. Contains 28 Proposetl R-1 lots.
Commissioner Mungall made a motion that Tentative Map of Tract
No. 3673 be approved, sub~ect tos
1. Make Lot No. 28 "Not A Par't Of The Tract."
2. That the developer make full.improvements on the above lot.
3. Sub~ect to Variance for Tot width.
4o Provide 6' draina9e easement along property line of Lot No. 6.
5e Pertinent plot and building plans to be submitted to
City Council for review.
6. Require that should this subdivision be deve2oped as more than
one subdivision, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted
in tentative form for approval.
This motion was seconded by Commissioner Marcoux and carried.
VARIANCE No. 1194 - PUBLIC HEARING. PETITION submitted by IRVING DUNUH III,
111.52 Barclay Dr., Garden Grove, Calif., requesting permission
to PERMIT CERTAIN INDUSiRIAL USES IN LIEU OF REQUIREMENT FOR
SPciI;~IAT. USE PERMIT AND REDUCE BUILDING AND LANDSCAPxNG SETBACK
TO ;~:0' ~ON LOARA AND BROl~DNfAY on the property described as a
par.ccel on the northeast corner of Broadway and Loara Street
ru~lning 290' north and 640' east, also described as
1600 Wa Broadway. Tt~eproperty is presently classi#ied 1i6-1,
LIGHT-MANUFACTURING.
Mrs. D. Butler, 603 Adrian, Anaheim, California, representing
the P. T. A< spoke against this request. The setback was the
primary concern of the schoole Mrs. Butler "At this time we
wish to state that we are against the lowering of requirements
or setbacks close to the school. There is much traffic on Loara.
The P. T. A. wishes to file a petition against it at this time~"
Mr. Dur.ua spoke in rebuttal. Mr. Durt~- was told that the tract was
scheduled for the Feb. 15, 1960 meeting. He said that there
would be 7 lots facing Broadway and 7 lots facing Mable. " I
don't know if there will ever be any M-1 buildings built there.
I feel that a gas station would not hurt the school children
any more than thb M-1 buiidings."
Mr. John Bunderhid .spake for two property owners, and spoke in
favor of it. He felt that a C-2 (meant C-3) wou~d be better
than an M zone.
Mrs. Butler stated that Loara is narraH. She also said there
is a service station one block away. She also mentioned
that there were no plans available. TtiE HEARING WAS CLOSED.
-3-
-.._.____
`t ~-
\\
REGULAR 1dEET;NG -_CITY PLANNING COMMISSION - FEBRUARY 1. 1960 - CONI:iNUEDs
VARIANCE No. 1194 - Commissioner Mauerhan offered Resolution No. 159, Series 1959-60,
~CONTINUED) that Variance No. 1194 be denied. Resolution was seconded by
Commissioner Morris and carried. The vote on the above resolution
was as follows=
AYES: C~ufMISSIONERS: Allred, DuBois, Gauer, Marcoux, Mauerhan,
Morris, Mungall, Summers.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
ABSENTs COMMISSIONERS: Hapgood.
RECLASSIFICATION - PUBLIC HEARING. PETITION submitted b•~ IRVING D1JA~uI, III,
No. F-59-60-73 11162 Barclay Dra, Garden Grove, Califorr.ia requesting that the
property described as a parcel on the ~.artheast corner of
Broadway and Loara Street running 172.50~ north and 156' east
from the centerlines of Broadway and Loara Street be reclassified
from M-1, LIGHT MANUFACfURIAlG, to C-3, HEAVY COMN~RCIAL~
Mrs. Butler said that the P> Te A. wished to oppose this
reclassification for the service station.
Mrs. Compton, 611 S. Loara, Anaheim, Calif., aiso spoke against it.
Mr. Geisler said this would go into a C-3 zone but due to the
new M-1 Ordinance there would be a question.
Mr. Mungall stated that in the case of a service station they
would not have to set behind a P-L in this case it would be
waived. THE HEARING WAS CLOSED.
Commissioner Allred offer~d Resolution No. 160, Series 1959-60
that Reclassification No. F-59-60-73 be recommended to the
City Council for deniale
This resolution was seconded by Commissioner Morris and carried.
The vote on the above resolution was as followss
AYES: COMMISSIONERSs Allred, DuBois, Gauer, Marcoux, Mauerhan,
Morris, Mungall, Summers.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
ABSENTs CO,W~IISSIONERS: ~ Hapgood.
~ The applicant was told he could appeal the action.
VARIANCE Na. 1195 - PUBLIC HEARING. PETITION submitted by MR. 8 MRS. J. B. McCABE,
1031 S. Concord Way, La Habia, California, requesting permission
to OPERATE A DAY NURSERY FOR CHILDREN 2 TeIltOUGH 6 on the property
-- ~ described as a parcei on the west side of Melrose between
Center Street and Broadway also described as 119 S. Melrose.
The property is presently classified as P-1, PARKING.
A discussion ensued regarding the caxe of the childr2n. T}~
HEARING WAS CLOSED.
Commissioner DuBois offered Resolution No. 161, Series 1959-60
that Variance No. 1195 be granted, sub~ect to:
1. Repair sidewalks as required by Dtrector of Public Works.
This Resolution was seconded by Commissioner Marcoux and carried.
The vote on the above resolution was as follows:
AYES~ COMMISSIONERSs Allred, DuHois, Gauer, Marcoux, Mauerhan9
Morris, Mungall~ Summers.
NOESi COMMISSIONERS: None.
ABSENTs COMMISSIONERSi Hapgood.
- 4 -
i
1
/
~ ~ ~
~ ~ .~
REGULAR MEETING - CITY PLANNING COMMISSION - FHBRIIARY 1 1960 - CONTINUED:
RECLASSIFICATION - PqBLIC HEARING. PETITIOtd submitted by ROHERT N. & C. C. MENZIE,
No. F-59-60~72 417 N. Palm, Anaheim, California requesting that property described
as a parcel on the north side of Katella Avenue 260' east of
the northeast coxner of Katella Avenue and Nutwood Street and
running 381° east, be reclassified from R-A, RESIDENTIAL- ~
AGRICULTURAL, to C-1, NEIGHBORHOOD COMN~RCIAL.
C. Menzie represented the applicants and stated that there are
C-1 and C-2 zoning in the area. They want to get the street in
their area finished. They had signatures of approval.
Mrs. Baer, 8650 Stanton Avenue, Garden Grove, Calif., has the
ad3oining property. She was in favor of it. THE ELARING
WAS CLOSED.
Commissioner Marcoux offered Resolution No. 162, Series 1959-60
that Reclassification No. F-59-60-72 be recommended to the
City Council for reclassification from R-A, RESIDENTIAL-
AGRICULTURAL, to C-1, NEIGHBORHOOD COMh~RCIAL, sub3ect to
the following conditionss
1. Dediaate 60' on Katella from centerline.
2. Prepare street improvement plans and install all improvements
(in ac.cordance with approved standard plans on file in
offic~~ of City Engineer) on Katella.
3. Paym~nt of 52.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes
on Katella.
4. C-1 Deed Restrictions.
This resolution was seconded by Commissioner Summers and carried.
The vote on the above resolution was as follows:
AYES: C0~7MISSIONERSs Allred, DuBois, Gauer, Marcoux, Mauerhan!
Morris, Mungall, Summers.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
ABSENTs COMMISSIONERSs Hapgood.
'TENTATIVE MAP OF - A Tentative Map of Tract Noe 3672 was presented to the Commission.
iRACT No. 3672 This tract ~s located 381.45' west of Euclid Avenue on the south
side of Orange Avenue. Subdividers ASSOCIATED DEVELOPERS,
1812 W. Broadway, Whittier, California. Contains 10 - R-1 lots.
Commissioner Mauerhan made a motion that Tentative Map of
Tract No. 3672 be approved, sub~ect toi
1. Pertinent plot and building plans to be submitted to
City Council for review.
2. Requre that should this subdivision be developed as more
than one subdivision, each subdivision thereof shall be
submitted in tentative form for approval.
This motion was seconded by Commissioner Allred and carried.
RECLASSIFICA?ION - PUBLIC HEARING. PETITION submitted by A. S. COLLINS,
No. F-59-60-74 1130 W. Lincoln Ave., Anaheim, Calif., requesting the
proparty described as a parcel on the west side of Los Angeles St.,
380' northwest of the intersection of Ball Road and
Los Angeles Street and running 120' noithwest and having a
depth of 203', alsa described as 1111 S. Los Angeles St. be
reclassified from C-1, NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL, and P-L,
PARKING and LANDSCAPING, to C-3, HEAVY COMMERCIAL.
- 5 -
i
i
i~
'------_-__ _ _ .
---------.._...__ _..._ ...._.__..
.___~ _._, ~ .-
i
i
I
/
~
V ~ ~ / \~1
W
~~T"r - CITY PLANNING COMNfISSION - FEBRUARY 1 1960 - CONTINUED:
~J~SSIFZC~lTI~N - Mr. Collins seid that the property to the south is being used j
Dio. F-59-60-74 as an Autamobile Agency. "Hecause it is a drive-in restaurant I
Lt~D) it needs C-3 Zoning."
~S~3L~ PaRK
~
No one appeared in opposition. THE HEARING WAS CLOSED.
Commissioner DuHais offered Resolution No. 163, Series 1959-60,
that Reclassification No. F-59-60-74 be recommended to the
City Cotmcil for reclassification from C-I, NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL,
and P-L, PARKING and LANDSCApING, to C-3, HEAVY COMI~RCIAL,
subject to the following conditions:
I. According to plans presented.
2. Dedicate 53' from centerline of Los Angeles Stre~t.
3. Install sidewalks. '
4. Payment of $2.00 per front ft. for street lightis.g purposes.
ihe resolution was seconded by Commissioner Summers and carried.
The vote on the above resolution was as follows:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, DuAois, Gauer, Marcoux, Morris,
Suma~ers .
I~ES: (~I$SIONERS: Mauethan and Mungall.
ABSENTs C089NISSIONERS: Hapgoodo
- Chairman Gauer stated that it is the desire of the City to
develop a climate in which trailer,parks can be a credit to
the City. The audience was told that if there were any items
that they did not agree with, the Commission would be glad to
hear their point of view.
Chairman Gauer read the first part of the Ordinance to the
audience.
A 1~r. Brown of Ranaho La Paz said that the owners of trailer parks
feel that the fee is un~ust, they wanted to know what the fee is
Yar. Also the other fees.
1tr. Boorey stated that his trailer park is in Anaheim, but in
the Garden ~rove sanitation district.
Mr. llercado spoke in regards ta the masonry wall which is required.
i~e feel that it should be left up to the Planning Commission
when the permit i~ to be issued. We feel that it should be left
up to the individual cases.
11r. Kenneth Brown, from Rancho La Paz, "We feel it should be the
same as the county A under 5100, no set back on the front."
Itr. Bo6twich of Nlidway Trailer City. "I feel the City has a problem
Mith the over night trailer park. 14 x 50 is the State requirement.
(Page 8) He thought it shouldn't be any more than 700 sq. ft.,
he thought this would be ample.
![r. Gauer said he thinks that any trailer park teat is in
business with the type of travel of today~ would provide for some
over night parking spaces.
1[r. ltercado stated that 70Q sq. ft. is the seme as Orange County.
Ae questioned page 8, Section B.
Parking of any one trailer is limited to 14 days on any 6 monthe
period. It was sfiated that some trailers are parked here in
Summer and then arc lived in during the Win~er.
-6-
------ ----•-- _ - ~~
• ~ _-'` -- _._~.
--- -
---- - .. . . _
~
C~
~
~
REQJLAR MEETING - CIlY_~ O~QSSIQi - FIDd~JARY 1. I960 - CONTINUEDs
~ TRAILER PARK - jlr. Broxn said about the nice parks that aze in Maheim.
i ORDINANCH
~ (CONTINUED) kr. Geisler said they shool~n't be restricted if they xant to leave
~ their trailer thexe all qear.
llr. Bostwick said that aver night trailers don't go into our large spots.
Cammissioner ~all left the ^eetieg at 3:45 0'Clack P. M.
ldr. Jiercado aslced for the other operators to have a copy of the
ordinanee.
It xas aslced if ~they couid have another meeting so ?railer Park
owners ca~ld get a chance to study the Ordinance?
Commissioner D6orrSs said he w~ou1~3 lilre to hear what they had to say
about the Ordinance.
Canmissioner Gauer, thoucht the oeeting shwld proceed.
Page 5, 5, 9 had questions an the~.
Some trailer parks rill not pex~it storage tmless it is out of site.
llr. Jdercado thaught sare consideration should be given to storag~
under the awning. It Tsas given many problems to the County.
In discussing storage IEr. ~own said that in xorking it out with
their am people that a storage area awld differ in size, being
determined by the size ofr the trailer. He thwght a definite study
shauld be given to it, he tho~ght the Coimty Ordinance cwers
it pretty ~rell.
Under 51~i.5 page 14, Ca~issioner Marcoux said that this states
that there eould be no cooking ~mder an aw~eing.
1~x'• Bro~m tha~ght there sas nathing srong xith a basbacue
under a metal awning, he said a cook stove wo~ldn't be allowed in
our park.
A qnestion came up, if thas nas rectroactive. 1Er. Geisler said
it may be rectroactive if it gives a certain time. As to certain
items as to protection it aight be rectroactive.
A gentlemph in the audience safd he would like to see it in writing
if it yras Tectx~a3ctive or not.
)dr. Geisler said if tLe ltobdle hemes have permanent structures,
then they are not ~offile hc~es.
Page 14, Si20.04 there ~ras a question an this.
Page 16, 5160.! C ras also looked at.and"dissussed. .~.±' •~
l~r. D. Collins spoke, 1ie tho~ht that 14 days is too short.
Commissioner llauerhan ba~ought up the qnestion when is a man permanent
and not permanetrt.
Commissioner Gauer asked what about this 52.40 ar do you charge over
night nar. 11Nere you have an over night person in this area it would
seem that t~e fce wwld settle t6e a~oimt har long they would stay.
You cauld up ~t am~ nig6t that they Kould stay.
l~r. Bostxiek said that tleey eharge by night an@ also monthly, then
tha~ aoul.d detex~ine wliethes he is pe:manent or not permanent.
-7-
/
.
~ -- i -° -
REGULAR NfEET'ING - CITY PLANNING COMMISSION - FESRUARY 1, 1960 - CON?INUED:
TRAILER PARK - Mr. Collins said he didn't think that the City cnuld state fees,
ORDINANCE he though~ that 100 days would probably be adequate to meet their
(CQNTINUED) needs and.would create a serious police problem.
Commissioner Gauer thought if they would have a study of 100 days
that it w.~uld be reasonable.
Mr. Mercado also discussed page 23, he thought it would be wise to
get together with the fire department.
Again there was a discussion of the fees on page 5.
Commissioner Gauer proposed a m,Y;:ing with Mr. Stringer, Fire Chief,
Member of Administrative Staff, Dick Reese, Engineer Of.fice,
Sanitation, and ?ublic Workse
Mr. MerCado said we will have some changes prepared to show it
to the Commission at that timea
The mgeting was scheduled for Monday, February 29, 1960 at
2s00 0'Clock P.Mo
PLANNING - Announcement of Pi-.~~ing Congress Meeting to be held in Eell,
CONGRESS California. Re:s••~~_cions are to be made.
MEETING
T.RAMPOLINE - Mr. Richard R~ese asked what zone Trampolines shoul~ go in to?
Commissioner Mauerhan suggested a Special Use Permit.
COUNTY USE - This request was for a veterinarian hospital on the north side
VARIANCE of Lincoln, approximately 1250 ft. east of Gilbert. Y'he Planning
No. 4459 Commission had recommended denial at their last meeting, hauever,
this body had promised to again give consideration if plans aere
available and if the Orange County Planning Commission ww2d
hold this matter over. Since that time the department has received
these plans and the Orange County Planning Commission has held
this matter over to February 10, 1960.
Commissioner Morris recommended that County Use Permit No. 4459
again be deniede This motion was seconded by Commissianer llarcowc
and carried.
AATOURNIJ~NT - The meeting ad~ourned at 4i45 0'Clock P. M.
Respectfully subauitted,
.--,
~
GO EEN, Secretary Pro Ye~s
~ ----_------------- ---------,___.-~---~ _%
, ---...----- -- ar--_- _
~ , ~ ~