Minutes-PC 1960/05/02~~ ~nr
~.im~ C~Tifornfa
I~g ~ P46~
REGUTAR MEETING ~ ~ ~Il1' ~ ~478!
REGULAR IWEETING - A Regular Meeting ~n~ ~~'itt~ ~~~ was called to
order at 2:07 0'~lot3~ ~- ~1. ~~~'p ~ 4norvm being present.
PRESENT - Chairman Gauer, C~~s3m~a~s d~IlIlae~, ~~r ~~o~s ~uerhan,
Mungall and Summers. •
_4.
~
ABSENT - Commissioners: ~apynDSi ame7 ~-
MINUTES - The Minutes o~ -the a~e~~ mff dB~fiIl D~„ Il~ w~ aPP=oved with the
following correcti~na ~ 41 - ~n ~ ~?t ~a- ~l - '
Mr. McBrian wh~ live3 ~ '~~ s~ nm aPPas~ta~an- ~
PRESENT - Acting Planning Di~+ea~im' - I~a~d ~
Planning Technician - ~~ ~
Assistaa+. Ci-ty A'ttcx~-ey - ~~ ~"s~'].~r
Planning Department ~' - a~~ ~
VARIANCE No. 1219 - Chairman Gauer ~~at~ ~r'attit~'ns m~sn~~ ~~ witfidrawn at the
request of the ~ppli~-~. ~~fl~m~n~ ~- ~~ ~~4 Permission
to put up two sign~ ~sas ~~ ~ ttffi -m~u ~qrs azdinaace xhich deletes
the application ~avi~~ ~ ~ &~ff~ ~Da~anm~ Ca~~~cn- j
VARIANCE No. 1235 - PUBLIC HEARING. ~3~ID ~rmfttt~ ~~- H- ~~s I600 Loftus Dr., :
Apt. °C", F1 Mont~, ~Il.aff. m~tl:nap~ ~am tQ AI/[I1/E INININII~Ii ;
~UNIT SIZE REQUI~ d97~ ~ a~ tfie property described i
ass A parcel 75" x-28° avn.tt~n ~ ffarm~ ~' '15P° om Cxestrrood Lane and ~
located on ~the ~~ s3x~ ~ff ~ IIat~r its ao=t~rest corner !
being 300' east a~ ~e s~ ~-a co&' Ea~g Nfa~' and Crestwood Lane.
The property is ~s~Ilg+ zmrm~ ~-~, Al1QII._'R'n~F Fl~DAII.F RESIDENfIAL.
The applicant ~vas ~~ stt~tb~ ~~~ oulY 3 vacant lots
left in this par~3~Il~a' s~sitn~m ~ff ~th'r,~'c~ ~-
The plans were s~oMm ~n i~ ~m.~n~-
There was no one in ~~adfle,m~ ~n~ itT~s Q'axiaace.
THE HEARING lNA~ ,CLD5£D.
Commissioner ]0auer~an m~ea'~ ~Dm~tn~n ID~u- ~4~s Series 1959-60,
and moved for i~ gra~ ~~m~„ ~ fiF Commissioner
Mungall granting 'Y~T~ ~+_ Il~n, ~ t~n i~ follaeiing conditions: .
1. Developmemt ia a~ w~8tt~ gi+~~ ~~• '
i
The foregoing tondi~3~ as ffm~m~ t~ Ho~ a m~g P=e=equisite to the ~
use of the proper~y 3~ ~ i~ go~~aa~ t~ sa~~t7f' and welfare of ;
the Citizens o~ ana~Fw~m, ;
On roll cail ~e ~~nx~yc~ a~mIl~ttnmim ~s ~~g' 'the folbowing votes
AYES: pp1~1[ISSI~: 4lIlIla~„ ~, ~'z ~a~s Mlauerhan,
~ ~'I 5r~t~.
NOESs ' IDia~.
ABSENl: COIY~SSI~: ~ ~ ~sns_
VARIANCE No. 1236 - City Council tnolc ~z~mm mn ~~~~~ ~~e of a new
1237 ~Hnana2 which 3sa~ ~a ~-
-Il-
~ ~ ~ ~~ ~
REGll;.AR MEETING - CITY PLANNING COMMISSION r_MAY 2, 1960 - CONTINUEDs
VARIANCE No. 1238 - PUBLIC HEARING. PETITION submitted by CAL-WE INVESTMENT CO.,
700 tiV. Orangewood, Anaheim, California, requesting ermission to
WAIVE 15' CORNER SIDE YARD REQUIREMHNT TO PERMIT 1Q~' SIDE YARD
on the Property described as= A parcel 75' x 125' with a frontage
of 125' on Knott Ave. and located on the southeast corner of
Knott Ave. and A-'el P1., also described as 3444 Ariel'P1.
The property is presently zoned R-3, MULiIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL.
Mr. R. Balen represented the applicant. He stated, that since the ;
time the land was purchased, the R-3 Ord. has been changed. ihe j
tract was designed under the old ordinance.
There was no one in the audience against the Varia~ce. 3
;
The plans were shown to • the Commission. 1
THE HEARING WAS CLOSED.
Commissioner Mungall offerad Resolution No. 245, Series 1959-60, and
moved for its passage and adoption, seconded by Commissioner DuBois,
granting Variance No. 1238, subject to the fol]prning conditions.
1. Development in accordance with plans presented.
The foregoing candition 3s found to be a necessary prerequisite to
the use of the property in order to preserve the safety and welfare
of the Citizens of Maheim.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was passed by the follow:ng votes
AYES: COMMISSIONERSs Allred, DuBois, Gauer, Marcoux, Mauerhan,
Mungall and Swnmers.
NOES: COMMISSIONSRS: None.
ABSENTs COMMISSIONERSs Hapgood and Morris.
SPEClA.L.'t`•iE PERMIT - This Special Use Permit is held over until June 6, 1960, due to ;
1'~, 72 an error in the application. ;
RECLASSIFICATION - PUBLIC HEARING. PETITION submitted by G. H. ROBERTSHAW, 222 W. 5th St.~~
No. F-59-60-95 Santa Ana, Calif., requesting that the property described asx
A parcel 101' x 152' with a fronta9e of 101' on Ball Rd. and ?ocated
on the southwest corner of Ball Rd. and ~lagnolia be reclassified ~,
from R-A, RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL, to C-3, HEAVY CON~RCIAL. ;
The applicant was present, and stated= it is a little bit narrow
to the east-west dimensions f~r a ma~or filling station. We have the
depth bat not the width so that is the reason why it is designed
this way. There is a home on this lot at the present time.
No one in the audience opposed this request.
THE HEARING WAS CLOSED.
The applicant stated the tNO streets are proposed to be widenod ~
This application had beenl+.Bld aer from. Planning Commission meeting ~
of April 18, 1960 because of a split vote: t
Commissioner Allred offered Resolution No. 246, Series 1959-60, and 1
moved for its passage and adoption, seconded by Commissioner Mauerhan, i
recommending to the City Council that Reclassification No. F-59-60-95, ~
for C-3, HEAVY COMh~RCIAL, be denied. j
i,
On roll call the foregoing resolution was passed by the following vote= ~
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, DuBois, Gauer, Marcoux, Mauerhan. ~
NOES: COMMISSIONERSs Mungall and Summers. ~
ABSENT= COMMISSIONERS: Hapgood and Morris. }
_ 2 _
---;_ _ __-------~-- .------~------~------------------:-
~ _ . - ---~_.~.__
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
,r
~
REGULAR Iu~ETING - CITY PLANNING COMMISSION -_MAY 2. 1960 - CONTI4JUEDs
RECLASSIFICATION - PUBLIC EiEARING. PE?ITION eubmitted by DAVE ~ ANN DOMRIES,
No. F-59-60-97 706 Knott Ave., Anaheim, Calife, requesting that the property
described ass Contiguous parcels of land 585' x 763' with a
frontage of 585' on Knott Ave. and located on the east side of
Knott Ave., Excepting the parcel 170' x 640' on the north; and its
northwest corner being 490' south of the southeast corner of Knott
and Grenge Avenues, also described as 706 Knott Ave., Anaheim,
Calif., be reclassified from R-1, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL,to
R-3, MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL.
The applicant was not present. There was no onein the audience
opposing the application.
Mr. Steen presented the staff recommendation for the sub~ect property.
The applicants' request is that it be developed in apartment houses.
Mr. Steen stated we have not received all the plot plans for all ~
the land. Mr. Steen said it could be developed into R-3 lots. ~
Commissioner Mungall made a motion that Reclassification No. F-59-60-97 3
~
be held over until the complete plans have been presented, seconded ~
by Commissioner Mauerhan, and carried. ~
~
RECLASSIFICATION - PUBLIC FIHARING. PETITION submitted by C. LOU~SE ?RUXAW, 706 N. Janss ~
No. F-59-60-98 St., Anaheim, Calif., requesting that the property described as: g
A parcel 229' x 292' with a frontage of 229' on Los Angeles St. ~
and located on the northwest corner of Los Angeles St. and Vermont St.
excepting a parcel 121' x 150' with a frontage of 121' on Los Angeles 9 t ~
and located en the northwest corner of Los Angeles and Vermont Sts.~ ~
also described as 887 S. Los Angeles St. be reclassified from ~
R-3, MULTIPLE FAMII:Y RESIDENTIAL, to C-1, NEIGHBORHOOD COMN~RCIAL, ~
(Business and Professional). ~
#
The applicant was present. There was not one in the audiance ~4
opposing this application. i
1
~
THE HEARING WAS CLOSED.
Commissioner Mungall offered Resolution No. 247~ Series 1959-60, ;
an9 moved for its passage and adoption! seconded by Commissioner ?
Summers, recommending to the City Council that Reclassification ~
Noa F-59-60-98, far C-i, NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL, (Business and
Professiona~, be approved sub~ect to the following conditions=
1. Development in accordance with plans presented.
2. Dedicate 45' on Los Angeles St. (exist. 40').
3. Remove existing improvements and prepa~a~ street improvement
plans and install all improvements in ar,cordance with approved
standard pl~~ns on file in office of City Engineer. - on
Los Angeles St.
4. Install sidawalks on Vermont St.
6. 90-Day Time limit on items No. 2~ 3, and 4e •
The foregoing conditiorts are found to be a necessary.prerequisite
to ~he use of the property in order to preserve the safety and
welfare of the Citizens of Anaheim.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was passed by the following votes
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, DuBois, Gauer, Marcoux, Mauerhan,
Mungall and Summers.
NOESs COMMISSIONERSs None.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Hapgood and Morris.
- 3 -
----r____.---------._...._- ---._.__..._..---...-----
--- - ------.__....__.__.,,.. _
~_
._. . ..._.._., -,,.._ ..
C. l ~ ~ ~ _ : ~
' 1'
i
~ ~
.
1 ~ ~_. .. .............
`.....~`~ ~_+Y ~~ ~ ~/
REGULAR MEETING - CITY PLANNING COMMISSION - MAY 2. 1960 - CONTINUEDs
RECLASSIFICATION - PUBLIC HEARINGa PETITION submitted by DAVIA W. 8 GENEU'A M. BAIR~
No. F-59-b0-99 8651 Stanford Ave., Garden Grove, Calif., requesting that the
property described as; A parcel 170' x 260' with a frontage of
260' on Katella Ave. and located on the northeast corner of Katella
and Nutwood Avenues, also described as 10501 E. Katella Ave.,
bE reclassified from R-1, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, to C•i,
NEIGHBORHOOD CQI~NIERCIALo
The applicant was present. Mrs. Bair read a definition of a home
for the aaed.
l~]re Eicheck, also representing Mro Cronberg, did not protest the
change of zoning, but wanted a stipulation that there would not
be any sexual deviates in this home. He also requested that a(r~'
of 6` block fence be erected on the property. Thi~~ gentleman
lives across the street on Nutwoode There is a children's school
bus stop at this streete Thare was not e,ne else in the audience
opposing this reclassificationo
The applicant did not fesl a wall was a requirement for a request
of this nature. There would be nothing mentally wrong with the
people, beeause they would be in a sanitarium. Mrs. Sair stated
the people that wc_~ld be at h~r home would probably be retired
missionaryse She wai~ts to abide wi~h all the laws.
Mr. Steen read a letter fsom a neighbor in favor of this request
with certain requirementso
Mr. Eicheck said she probably will want to bui.ld additional buildings.
THE FIEARING WAS CLOSEDa
ihere is a chain link fence along the north.
Commissioner Allred offered Resolution No. 248, Series 1959-60, and
moved for its passage and adoption, seconded by Commissioner Marcoux,
recommending to the City Council that Reclassification No. F-59-60-99,
for C-1, be approved sub~ect to the following conditions:
,,. ~
7
la Development in accordance with plans presented.
2. Front yard should be kept to residential standards on both Ball and
Nutwood.
3a North side should be fenced.
4. Dedicate 60° on Katella Ave.
5. Dedicate 32' on Nutwood.
6. Prepare street improvement plans and install all improvements
in accordance with approved standard plans on file in office of
City Engineer ... on Both Katella and Nutwood.
7. Payment of $2s00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on both
Katella and Nutwoodo
S. 90-day time limit on items No. 4, 5, 6, and 7e
The foregoing conditions are found to be a necessa:y prerequisite to
the use of the property in order to preserve the safety and welfare
of the Citizens of Anaheim.
On roll call the foregoi~:q resolution was ;~assed by the following votes
AYESs COMMISSIONERS: Allred, DuBois, Gauer, Marcoux, Mauerhan,
Mungall and Summers.
NOESs COMMISSIONERS: None.
ABS~NT: CQMMISSIONERS: Hapgood and Morriso
- 4 -
~ 1
i •
~ ~
. ,
~ .::..1
M1 ,~
~_) , `~ ~ +A
REGULAR Iu~ETING - CITY PLANNING COMMISSION - MAY 2 1960 - CONTINUEDs
REC:LASSIFICATION - PUBLIC HEARINGo PETITION submitted by EARL J. SPIRES, 10261 S.
N~~. F-59-60-100 describedeasSt~AnAirregularaparcelrwithsannaveragetdepth ofr206' and
a frontage of 345' on Los Angeles Sto and located on the west side
of Los Angeles Sto, its southeast corner being approximately 325' north
of the northwest corner o'f Los Angeles Sta and Midway Dr. be
recla^sified frd'~n C-19 NE'IGHBORHOOD CONUdERCIAL, to C-3, l~IEAVY
COMMERCI~L.
The a;~plicant was present and stated he wanted the C-3 zoning for a
new car dealership.
Mr. Robert Henry spoke in opposition to the reclassification.
Mr. Henry purchased this land which the apartments are on from
Mr. Spires. He didn°t feel that a car dealership would be good
next to the apartmentso '
Mrs. Hollingsworth from Wipston Rd. ob~ected to the reclassification
and stated that there is a building there that :shouldn't be.
Mro Spires said he keeps his land upo He said he tries to co-operate
with the neighborso
Mre Hollenberg also spoke against this reclassification he aLso
represented some neighborso He stated that this tire business
has trucks traveling through the residential street. They put
up tire racks which were not supposed to be there. He said if
it is retzil sa~les they most be doing a tremendous business. To the
south is a future elementary school.
Mro Henry stated that they had wanted to put up a sign in this
area but was told the zoning wouldn°t be correct.
Mra Spires was told that he was in violation,
THE HEARING WAS CLOSEDo
\
Mro Steen stated that the Benson-Loomis Tire Co. has been
completely unr.oap~iative over the past months and t}~is problem
has been turned over to the attorney°s office.
Commissioner Marcoux made a motion that Reclassification No. F-59-60-100
be held over until it be settled by the Attorney's Office, this
motion was seconded by Commissioner Allred and car•ried.
RECLASSIFICA'TION - PllBLIC HEARING. PETITION submitted by JOSEPH D. HUARTE, 1464 E. La ~lma,;
No. F-59-60-101 Anaheim, Calife, requesting that the property described ass An
irregular parcel with an average depth of 600' anG a frontage of 230'
o~ Placentia Avea and located on the nort:~west corner of Placentia Ave. i
and Vermont Avea, excepting a parcel 135' x 135' loca~:ed on the
northwest corner of Placentia Aveo and Vermont Ave., k,e reclassffied !
from R-3, MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, and R-1, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDti~TIAI..~
to G-1, NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL. ~
Mra Rusty Roquet represented the applicant. He showed the Commission
a precise plan for the property. The buildings would house a market
and service snops~toward the residential area'is planned a medical
building. A 6° block wall with landscaping faces the residences.
There will be planting along the front. North of the serviae staticn is
to be a snack shop. The market would be similar to a"speedee mart"
tyoe of operation. He said that he felt this would be an asset
to the neighbors. It is approximately 1 mile from the East Anaheim
Shopping Center.
- 5 -
~3.
_ .._------__~-_ _ _ _._.._ _ . .. ... ....___.__. ..___.. __._. ._.__..__, ~ _ ___ __._._.__
!43 ~---. _
----- .... . _
( ~
REGULAR 1NHETING - CITY P eNNT .0 TSSTpN - MAY Z, 1960 - CONTINUED:
RECLASSIFICA?ION - Mr. Mandeberg from Tyrol Place presented a petition of protest.
No. F-59-60-101 He stated this was about the third time they have come before the
(Co~tinued) Plannin~ Commission in regards to this property. The City Park
is right across the streeto This gentleman s~oke to Mr. Stranach,
Director of Parks and Recreation who was also against it. There were
4 others in the audience against ito
NLr. Roquet spoke again and said when anyone is purchasing a hoMe they
want to be near a shopping area.
Mrs. Fralick from Verde St. also spoke against it. She felt there
was enough comn~ercial in this area.
THE HEARING WAS CLOSED.
Commissioner Mauerhan stated that with ttie park across the stre~~t,
and with the amount of mo~ey that the City is putting in for the
benefit of the City he didn't think it a necessity to g~ along
with any more commercial.
Commissioner Mauerhan offered Resoluiton No. 249, Series ?959-60, and
moved for its passage and adoption, seconded by Commissioner Allred,
recommending to the City Council that Reclassification No. F-59-60-101,
for G1, Nc.i~HBORH00D COMIu~RCIAL, be denied.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was passed by the following vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERSs Allred, DuBois, Gauer, Marcoux, Mauerhan,
Mungall ~nd Summers.
NOHS: COMMISSIONERS: Noneo
ABS~NTs COMMISSIONERSs Hapgood and Morris.
TENTATIVE MAP OP - A Tentative Map of Tract No. 3438 was presented to the Commission.
TRACT No. 3438 The tract is located on the northeast corner of Sout4 St• and
Sunkist Sto and contains 107 proposed R-1 lots. Owne* and subdividers ~.,
Mar3an Deve2opment Inco, 9552 Ball Rd., Anahe;m, Calif. ;
Mr. McDar.:~l, represented the applicant. He said that thi~: is a
County Tract and they plan to annex into the City.
Commissioner Mungall made a motion to recommend to the County
Planning Commission that Tentative Map of Tract No. 3438 be approved
sub~ect to the following conditions: This motion was seconded by .
Commissioner Mauerhan and carrieda
lo Subject to annexationo
2. Sub3ect to State Highway appsovale
3. Pertinent plot and building plans to be submitted to City Council
for review.
4. Require that should this subdivis3on be developed as more than one
subdivision, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in
tentative forms for approval.
5. $25°00 per lot Park and Recreation fee to be collected as part of
Building Permit.
-6-
l } ~ ~J ~
,~~
'' ~ .
. _ _ .~
__ _
~ ~ ~ ~
~; ~ ~
t, 1 ~
i
REGULAR MEETING - CITY PLANNING CQMMISSION_- h6AY 2. 1960 - CONTINUEDs ;
. i
TENTATIVE MAP OF - A Tentative Map of Tract No. 3770 wae presented to the Commission. ;
TRACE No. 3770 The tract is located 659' west of Placentia Ave on the south side +
of La Palma Ave. and contains 83 proposed~R-1 lots. Subdivider= i
Chip Development Co., 12911 Belfast, Garden Grove, Calif. ~
Mr. McDaniel represented the developer. He stated that at the
Enginpering Committee Meeting and prior to that, changes requested
had been discussed and will comply.
Commissioner Mauerhan made a motia.^. tha± Tentative Map of Tract No. 3770
be approved, subiect te ±he iollowing conditions= ihis motion was
seconded by Commissioner Allred and carried.
1. Dedicate access rights on La Palma to City.
2o Provide 6' drainage easement along north side of Lot 57.
3. Pertinent plot ahd building plans to be submitted to City Council
for review.
4. Require that should this eubdivision be developed as more than one
subdivision, each subdivisiop thereof shall be submitted in
tentative form for approval.
5. $25.00 per lot Park and Recreation fee to b2 collected as part of
Building Permit.
TENTATIVE MAP OF - A Tentative Map of Tract No. 3777 was presented to the Commiesion.
TRAG7 No. 3777 The tract is located on the south side of the Riverside Freeway
50' west of Cypress St. and contains 14 R-1 lots. Owner and
subdivider: Orbi~ Construction Coa, R. Wickman, 225 E. 17th St.,
Santa Ana, Calif.
Mr. M~Daniel represented the applicant9 and stated that he is in
agreement with the.Engineering requirements.
Commissioner Allred made a motion that Tentative Map of Tract No. 3777
be apNroved sub~ect to the follawing conditions= This motion was
seconded by Commission DuBois and carried.
1. SubJect to State Highway approval.
2. Cypress Ave. to 53'.
3. 60° street o}iehing to be provided 280' ± E/o West tract boundary.
4o Pertinent plot and building plans to be submitted to City Council
for review.
5. Require that should this subdivision be developed as more than one
subdivision~ each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in
tentative form for approvale
6o 529.00 per lot,Park and Recreation fee to be collected as part of
Building Permit•
RECORD OF SURVEY - Owner~ Wynne B. Mullin. Location: South side of La Palma Ave.,
281.18' east of Citron St.
Mr. NNc Daniel represented the applicant and stated that they want to
sell the land or lease it.
Mr> Steen stated that a Record of Survey does not normally require
Commission approval, but since there are more than 4 parcels involved
approval is required. Otherwi~e a subdivision map would have to be
£iled.
Mr. Steen stated he would recommend the Commission approving this with
the filing of a common easement or Mr. McDaniel satisfying our
City Attorney with any common easements that are necessary.
Commissioner Mauerhan made a motion to approve this Record of Survey,
sub~ect to the filing of easements to all of the properties to the
satisfaction of the City Attorney. This motion was seconded by
Commissioner Allred and carried.
- 7 -
-- ... . . _ ~
i
~
~
~
~
_. . _._._~...._. _ _ .
.- -- ---- - - - ----___.- _
~ _ -- - --
~
i ~
i '
, '..
.
~-` ~: _~~ ~ ~;~) ~
REGULAR MEETING - CITY PLANNING COMMISSION - MAY 2. 1960 - CONTINUEDs
SAVANNA SCHOOL - Request for additions :elative to future administration building,
DISTRICf maintenance shop and warehouse facilities at the Hansen School.
Mr. Reese stated that Savanna School Distrir.t in June, 1959 requesLed
permission from the Commission to allow them to use Lot 19 for access.
It was permitted for a walk way.
Mr. Reese asked Mr. Geisler if a Public Hearing would be required
for iwo 60'x 80'structures, one a warehouse and one a maintenance
shop as it is in an R-A Zone?
It was mentioned that the school is under State aid.
Mr. Geisler stated off hand it is probably the same as State and
School Building and are not actually sub3ect to tha control of the
Planning Commission or the City Council.
Mr. Reese felt a hearirig should be held in regards to the roadway.
Commissioner Gauer also thought that was a good idea and suggested
that someone from the State be p~esent at the Hearing.
Commissioner Allred ctated thdt he ~hought it should be left as a
walk way.
ORANGE COIJNTY - This rquest is for a small animal hospital. Mr. Steen read the County
USE VARIANCE notice to the Commission.It is 200' north of Woodley Ave.
No. 4533
The applicant, Dr. Metz, was present. He stated that the wall ia
the back is of such a height that if he wanted to add on he could
put a roof over it and thus enclose it. The animals will be in
the enclosed part of the building. It will be air conditioned and
modern in appearance.'
Dr. Metz showed pictures of the sub~ect property and also pictures
of other pog and Cat hospitals in various locations. He felt that
this type of a place should not be placed by a railroad.
Dr. Metz read the request to the Planning Commission that he has
prepared for the O~ange County Planning Commission. He stated
that NI-1 property in Anaheim along a highway is scarce. The
dog and cat hospital is not the same as it was 50 years ago. Western
Anaheim is in much need for a Dog and Cat Hospital this is not only
my opinion but that pf pet owners.
Commissioner Allred made a motion to ~ecommend approval to the
Orange County Planning~Commission fo~ Orange County Use Variance No. 4533,
seconded by Commissioner Marcoux, and carried.
At this time Mr. Reese introduced Dean Rathman who was Student
Planning Director ~or ~he Day.
ADJOURNNI~NT - The meeting ad~ourned at 4:33 P. M.
Respectfully submitted,
_ _ ~~ Y-a~ A~~~ ~ :
RICHARD REESE, Secretary
-8-
;
~.
~
~
~
~
~
~