Loading...
Minutes-PC 1960/10/07~ ' ~ ~ ~ i 1 i i _ i City Hali Anaheim, California October 7, 1960 -0 order at 2:00 0'Clock P.M, by Chairman Gaues, a quorum being present; in accordance with the written consent to the holding of a special meeting and waiver of notice thereof signed by Melbourne A. Gauer, Chairman. PRBgHNT - COMMISSIONERS: ~llred, Gauer, Hapgood, Marcoux, Morris, Mungall and Summers. AB3HNT COMMI3SIONBRS: None. pR8$BNT - Acting Planning Director - Richard Reese Planning Technician - Martin greidt Planning Department Secretary - Jean Page RBSIGNATION - Acting Planning Director Reese informed the Commission that Commis- sioner DuBois has submitted his resigaatioa from the Commissiom, and Chairman Gauer noted that the resignatioa of Mr. DuBois and - Mr. Mauerhan creates two vacancies at the present time, both of which are subject to Council appointment. RECLA3SIPICATION ~ RBVIBW. PSTITION submitted by the CITY OF ANAHHIM and recommend- No. P-60-61~29 ed for approval by the Commission at the meeting of September 19, 1960 for reclassification to M-1 and P-L of property located on the south side of and along Anaheim Road for a distance of approxi- mately 660 feet wPSt frum an3 1,000 feet east from the intersection of Anaheim Road and Miller Street. The Commission was informed that the City Councii had referred this case to the Qommission for amendment of Resolution No. 72, Series 60-61, which had recommended approvai of Reclassification No.P-60- 61-29, request ior reclassification of property utilized by Auto- . netics Division of North American Aviation. It was nnted that the l resolution outlined the Hngineering requiremenLs which were incor- porated with the Planning Department recommendations, and that the amendment was necessary to eliminate the five conditions adopted by the Commission because they were the equivalent of the require- . • ments im~osed by the City Council. Commissioner Hapgoocl offered Reso'lutioa No. 96, Series 60-61, and moved for its passage and adoption, seconded by Commissioner ldor~ ' ris, recommending that RQSOlution No. 72 be amended, eliminating the conditions enumerated on Page 2 of said resolution. ~ On roil call the foreRoing resolution was passed by tlie following vote: AYSS: COi~4fISSI0N8RS: Allred, Gauer, Hapgood, Marcoux, Morris, M~angall, Summers. NOHS: COhMISSIONBRS: None. ABSBNT: COt~MiI3SI0NBRS: None. AFffiIVD~ffiNT TO CODS ~ ZON7NG CODB, SBCTION 18.64 , CONDITIONAL U9HS. This amendment was considered at four previous Planning Commission meetings aad in each instanSe was held over for Further study. - 1 - SPBCIAL MBBTING OP THB CITY PIANNING COdA4ISSI0AT SPECIAL 6ffiBTING - A Special Meeting of the City Planni:g Commission was called to a~i ~ ~ ~ . . . ~ . a ~ -_T_ -- - ~ ' ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ° Q ~.1 ~:._~~~ ~. SPBCIAL F~flTING, GITY PIAHIvING C069dI3SI0N, OCTOBBR 17, 19E0, CONTINUHD: AF~NDMSNf TO CODB,CONTINUBD• Copies of the proposed amendment had been distributed to the Commis- sioners and it was noted that Assistant City Attorney Joe Geisler had reviewed the proposed zoning code amendment. Commissioner Mungall suggested that "pawn shops" be incinded under Section 18.64.020 USB, and be removed from uses permitted in C-3 zones. ~ Commissioner Marcoux offered Resolution No. 97, Series 60-61, and moved for its passage and adoption, seconded by Commissioner Alired, that Amendment to Title Bighteen, Ghapter 18.64, ZONING CODH - CON- DITIONAL USES, OF THH ANAFIBIM MUNICIPAL CODB be recommended to the City Council for adoption as proposed, and with an ~addition that "pawn shops" be added to Section 18.64.020, Subsection 3, between (n) and (o}, On roil cail the foregoing resoiution was passed by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Gauer, Hapgoad, Marcoux, Morris, Mungall, Summers. N08S: COMMISSIONBR3: None. ~ AB3HNT: Commissioners: None. Commissioner Mungall recommended further that the Commission init:ate ~ action to remove "Pawn Shops" from Chapter 18.48, C-3, HBAVY CONN!ffit- ' CIAL ZONH. i PBTITION FOR - The form for the proposed PBTITION FOR CONDITIONAL USB PffitMIT was i CODiDITIONAL submitted to the Commission, and Acting Planning Director Reese ex- ; USB P~tMIT plained that this form would be utilized as the application request f in cases governed by the "Conditional Use" Section previousiy adopt- j ed bq the Commission. He advised that it would require a resolution ~ for ita adoption. y Cormnissioner Mungall suggested that on Page 2 of the Petition, under Item 111, Section C, the inform2.*ion requested might be considered as confidential by the applicant, and that an applicant might be re- luctant to give this information unless it was kept in confidence, Tbe Commission agreed that an appropriate insertion ehouid be includ- ed in that section. Commissione= Mungall offered Aesolution No. 98, Sesies 60-61, second- ed by Co~issioner Marcoux, that the PBTITION FOR CONDITIONAL USB PERMIT be adopted and that on Page 2, Item 111, C., be revised to state as follows: "C. Attach one complete plot pian, accurately dimensioned to a uniform, indicated scale, showing boundaries and dimensions of property, loca- tion with respect to nearest street intersection, location and size of existing and proposed buildings and structures, froat, side, and , rear yard setbacks, roadways, off-street parking facilities, access drives, waits, landscaped areas, any pertinent aaalytical or market research data (aay such-data wili be heid in confidence if requested), and such other data which will clarify and support the proposed use of the subject property." Oa roll caii the foregoing resolution was passed by the following vote: _ 2 _ ~` - ~.. . ~ . ., . ~ ~ . . ~ ' .- _ ' - ~~~~~~r . . ~ . - . . . . - ~ - . ' , ~~ {:~ ~n ~ ~ I 3PECIAL MBHTING , CI9'Y PIANNING COI~AIIg3I~[i, pC~~ 2T, 1960. ()piPfINU~: ' PBI~MYT F~t CONDITIONAL USB PERMIT Ctk11TMTBt); ~ - . A~~ ~QMA~IISSIOHIRS: Allred, Gauer, Hxpgood, llarcoux, Morris, )luagall, SuQers, NUBS: OOMMISSTONBRS: None. ~5~: CaMrlISSIONIItS: None. DINNBR MEBTING - Acting Planning Director Reese infor~ed the Co~oission that res ti erwa- ons must be made by October 10. 1960 for the SonYhern California Planning Congress Dinner Meeti ng, schednled for October 13, 1960 at the Disneyland Hotel. He stated that he rronld mal~e reservations for the Commissioners who ~ere interested in attending, in addition to ~ the members of the Develo uent C i •. p o_ ttee that the Co~ission indicated should be invited to this ceeti .ng, SCHOLARSHIP - ~~T Chairmaa Gauer informed the Co~issioa that oalp one applicaat had qua3ified for the $1 000 schol i i , azs i p offered by the planning Congress for a student majoring in p1a~g. ~ stated that the Commissio was i a nterested in interviewing aad obtaining an applicant who hud prepared a valuable thesis that conld be p=inted and circulated among the Planning Congress seabership. CQA~ffidS\TION - Chairman Gauer inquired about the possibility of coapensatio f n or. extra meetings such as this Speciai -feetiag, a~ Acting Planniag Director Rees2 informed hi m that the aatter bad been discussed with the City Manager, aad that Special lfeetit s ~rere i . g cons dered a valid reason for requesting additionai compensatioa for the Commissioaers, He stated that it might be neces a s ry to prepare an amendment in order to secure legal approval by the City Council, and that further investigation would be mad i e nto the aattez. ~B,JO, URNMffi1T ~ The Meetiag was adjourned at 3:Op p~Cloct P.-!. Respectfnlly sa'oaitted~ ~~D RBBSB, ecretarp .~y,t! - 3 - \ -.. _..__.~,.,..,r,,;.,::.. -<,: ,.. ;.... --- ; _ .---'~ , ~~ ~ ~