Minutes-PC 1961/06/12~
F
•~
~
~
~'`
~ ~
CITY HALL
ANAHEIM~ CALIFQRNIA
JUNE 12, 1961
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY PLANNING COMM1SSlON
- A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION WAS GALLED TO ORDER
~AT 2:00 O~CLOCK P.M. BV ViCE CHAIRMAN MORRIS~ A QUORUM BE~NG PRESENT.
- VICE CHAIRMAN: h1oRRis; COMM1SSlONERS: AILRED~ MnRCOUx, MUNGALL~
PERRY~ SUMMERS.
- COMM1SSlONERS: CHAIRMAN GAUER~ HAPGOOD.
- PLANNING DIRECTOR - RICHARD REESE
SENIOR PLANNER - MARTIN KREIDT
ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY - JOHN DAWSON
COMMISSION SECRETARY - JEAN PAGE
- VICE CHAIRMAN MORRIS LED THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG.
- THE MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF MAY 29~ 1961 WERE APPROVED AS SUBMITTED.
VARIANCE N0. 1354 - CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING. PETITION SUBMITTED av L. P. AND EMMA H.
E H. K WILSON, HARRY Z. nHn.MARIE J. WILSON AND LeROY J. AND
NICHOLS
,
MARGERY W. KE~IP, OwNetts: SALEM DEVELOPMENT COMPANY - S.D. CAPLAN~
~-~, ~ 12351 WESTMINSTER AVENUE~ SANTA ANA CALIFORNIA AGENT REQUESTING
CONSTRUCTION
ERM~
~'
~
'
0 P
T
tNT
EQUIREM
~ PERMISSION To~WAIVE MINIMUM HEIGHT I
` OF TWO STORY APARTMENTS ON PROPERTY DESCRiBED AS: AN IRREGULAR SHAPED
~
~ PARCEL LOCATED 100 FEET SOUTH OF CATALAPA AVENUE~ BOUNOED ON THE EAST
, BY CHIPPEWA STREET~ THE SOUTH BY THE ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL CHAN-
NEL AND THE SOUTHEAST BY THE SANTA ANA FREEWAY~ AND FURTHER DESCRIBED
~ AS ~ENTATIVE TRACT N0. 4107.
~~ ~~ THE COMMISSION NOTED THAT THE SUBJECT PETITION WAS SUBMITTED IN CON-
E ~ ~ JUNCTION~WITH PETITlON FOR RECLASS(FiCATiON N0. 60-61-86 AND TENTATIVE
THAT THE PETITiON FOR RECLASSIFICATION WAS
MAP OF TRACT N0.,4107
~
i~.~ }~
~ DENIED BY RESOLUTION N0. 244, SERIES 1960-61~ THAT THE TENTATIVE MAP OF
. ~ TRACT N0. 4107 HAO BEEN APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION ON MARCH 20~ 1961
BEFORE THE PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION HAD BEEN FILED~ AND THAT THE
~
~~~~~ ~ SUBJECT PETITION FOR VARIAiICE WAS CONTINUED UNTIL THE MEETING OF JUNE
~ 12~ 1961 IN ORDER TO PROVI.DE THE CITY COUNCIL WITH AN OPPORI'UNITY TO
REVIEW THE PETITtON FOR RECLASSIFICATION AND THE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP.
~ IT WAS POINTED OUT THAT A FURTHER CONTINUANCE OF THE SUBJECT PETITION
~~' WOULD BE NECESSARY TO ALLOW THE CITV COUNCIL ADDITIONAL TIME TO ACT
~ UPON THE TRACT. MAP AND THE PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION. -
~ ~ ~ .~COMMISSIONER MARCOUX OFFERED A MOTION~ SECONDED BY COMMISSIQNER ALLRED
~ AND CARRIEO~ THAT PE"ITION FOR VARIANCE N0. 1354 BE CONTINUED UNTIL THE
, MEETIkG OF JUNE 26~ 1961.
'~ RECLASSIFICATION
N0. 60-61-90
~ ...,
OBTAIN A TENANT~AFTER WHICH,HE WOUL.D pROCEED WITH VELO M . ~
A.DISCUSSION ENSUED RELATIVE,TO THE RECCASSIFICATION OF PROPERTY ABUT-
` TING SUBJEC7 PROPERTY ON THE EAST AN6 SOUTH WITHOUT DEVELOFMENT PLANS~
.~AND IT WAS.POINTED~OUT THAT~A~RESOLUTtON OF INTENT FOR-RECLASSIitCA~ ~
' TION OF THESE PROPERTIES TO THE M-l~ L~GHT MANUFACTURING~ AND P-L~
PARK I NG LANDSCAP I NG~ ..°."vivco r+AS PEND I NG.
-201-
- CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING. PETITION SUBMITTED.BY RAYMOND G. AND ESTEILE
K. SPEHAR~ 1532 BEACON AVENUEr ANAHEIM~ CALIFORNIA~ OWNERS~ REQUESTING
THAT PFOPERTY DESCRI,BED A5; H PARCEL 330 FEET BY 640 FEET Wt.TH A
FRONTAGE OF 330 FEET ON~ANAHEIM ROAD AND LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF
ANAHEIM ROAD BETWEEN DOWLING STREET AND MILLER STREET~ ITS NORTHWEST
CORNER BEING APPROXIMATELY 640 FEET EAST OF THE SOUTF'.EAST CORNER OF
DOWLING STREET AND ANAHEIM ROAD BE RECLA551FIED FROM THE R-A, RESIDEN-
TIAL AGRICULTURAL ZONE To THE M-i, LIGHT MANUFAC7URING~ AND rHe P-L,
PARKING LANDSCAPIIVG, ZOME.
THE COMMISSlON D{SCUSSED PREV10U5 ACTION ON THE SUBJECT PETITION 4T THE
MEETING UF MAY 1~ 1961 WHEN TIiE SUBJECT PETITION WAS CONTINUED BECAUSE
THE PETITIONER WAS NOT PRESENT AND HAO NOT SUBMITTED DEVELOPMENT PLANS
FOR~THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. .
THE COMMISSION NOTcD THAT PLOT AND ELEVATION PLANS HAVE NOT BEEN SUB-
MITTED FOR THE SUBJECT PETITiON.
THE HEARING WAS CLOSED.
COMMISSIQNER MUNGALL OFFEREO A MOTION TO CONTINUE THE SUBJECT PETITION
UNTIL DEVELOPMENT Pl,ANS W~RE SUBMITTED~.C~R CONSIDERATION. ~
MR. RAYMOND SP6HAR~ THE PETITIQNER~ APPEARED BEFORE THE COM~715510N~
STATED THAT HE Hpp NOT BUBMITT~D PLANS FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY BECAUSE
HE DID NOT"HAVE DEFINITE PLANS FOR DEVEI.OPMENT~ AND THAT HE WAS DESIR-
OUS OF E51'ABt,I5HIN6 INDUSTRIAL ZONING FOR THE PROPERTY 50 THAT HE COULD
DE P ENT PLANS
.~. - ~.w+.re~.s'_. . .,_.. ....., ~'~ .~.~~ ... -. . ...
... , . ._~. ...... '`.~... .~.~:r..~t~<'_?~."._._.,.~,<a __.. .__ ,_'-_ _ _-- ,};,.
~ ~ ~~~?, `'- S ~.i~.,~ ~~~
r . ~J
~ . . ___ ~ ___. ..~.- .
r
~" •
~
~_
~:` MiNUTES, CiTY PtANNING COt~HISSION~ .)UNE 12, 1961, CONTlNUED:
~ Z~2
~"~~~-~'~ -~ ftECLASSIFI6AT10iV - Cotan~sss!or~eR MUNGA4L WITHDREa HIS MOTION 70 CONT.NUE THE SUBJECT
~ N~. 66-61-90 PETITION.
~~~~ CONTINUED
THE COMMISSION FOUND AND DETERMINED THE FOLLOWING FACTS REGARDING THE
~ ~ SUBJECT PETITION:
~ 1. THAT THE PETITIONER PROPOSES.A RECLASSIFI.CATION OF 7HE ABOVE DES~
i; ' i CRIBED PROPERTY FROM THE R-A~ RESIDENTOAL AGRICULTURAL ~ ZONE TQ
~` ~ ZONEMTO~BE'UTILMZEDFAFORRLIGHTZMANUFACTURING AND COMMERCIALDUSEPBUT~
~' RESTRICTED FROM RESIDENTIAL USE OR THE 5ALE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES.
I 2. THAT THE PROPOSED RF.CLASSIFICATION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY IS NECESSARY
~~ OR~DESIRABLE FOR THE ORDERLY AND PROPER DEVELQYMENT OF THE COMMUNITY.
~ ~ 3. ~THAT THE PROPOSED RECLASSIFICATLON OF SUBJECT ?ROPERTY DOES PROPERLY
RELATE TO THE ZONF.S AND l'HEIR PERMIT7ED USES LOCALLY ESTABLISHED IN
~:i'"~.~".~.:>- CLOSE PROXIMITY TO SUBJECT PROPERTY AND TO THE 20NE5 AND THEIR PE R-
~ MITTED USES GENERALLY ESTABLISHED THROUGHOUT THE COMMUNITY.
4. THAT THE PROPOSED RECLASSIFICATION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY DOES REQUIRE
DEDICATION FOR AND STANOARD IMPROVEMENT OF ABUTTING STREETS ~ECAUSE
SAID PROPERTY DOES RELATE TO AND ABUT UPON STREETS AND HIGHWAYS
- WHICH ARE PROPOSED TO CARRY THE TYPE AND QUANTITY OF TRAFFIC~ WHICH
~~: ~. WILL BE 6ENERATED BY THE PERMITTED USES~ IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
~ CIRCULATION ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN.
5. THAT NO ONE APPEARED IN OPPOSITION 1'0 SUBJECT PETITI.ON.
COMMISSIONER MUNGALL OFPERED RE50LUTION N0. 279~ SERIES 1960-61~ AND
MOVED FOR ITS PASSAGE AND ADOPTIONa SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER ALLRED~
RECOMMENDING TO THE C61'Y COUNCOL THAT PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICA"f10N N0.
60-61-90 BE GRANTED~ SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS;
!
F~~ ~ 1. DEDOCATION OF 45 FEET FROM THE MONUMENTED CENTERLINE OF AWAHEIM
ROAD (20 FEET EXiSTING).
k. ~ 2. PREPARATION OF STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS AND INSTALLAT{JN OF ALL
I~.~~ . ~ IMPROVEMENTS~ IN ACCORDANCE WlTH APPROVED STANDARD PL.ANS ON FILE
~ IN THE'OFFICE OF THE CS7Y ENGI.NEER~ AT THE TIME OF ~EVEIOPMENT.
~.~ ~ 3. PAYMENT OF $2.00 PER FRONT FQOT FOR STREET LlGHTING PURPOSES AT THE
~ TIME OF DEV~L.OPMENT.
~
!~ 4. PROVISION OF UTIL:.TY EASEMENTS ALONG EXTERIOR BOUNDARIES AS ~ETER-
4'. MINED BY THE DIRECTOR OF PU~JL:C UTILIT~ES.
5. TIME LIMITA710N OF NINETY (90~ GAYS FOR THE ACCOMPLISHMENT OF ITEMS
1 AND 4.
'~ ~ 6. RECORDATIAN OF DEED RES'PRiCTi0N5 RESTRICTING USE OF SUBJECT PROPERTY
~ -~~ FOR PURPOSES OF P.ESIDENTIAL USE OR THE SALE OF ALCOHOLOC BEVERAGES.
7. SUBMISSOON OF DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR APpROVAL BY THE CITY COUNCII
. BEFORE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING~PERMITS.
~ THE FOREGOING CONDITIONS WERE RECITED AT THE MEETING AND WERE FOUND TO
` ~ 5ERVENTHESSAFETYRANDRWELFARErOFTTHEUCIT/ZENSEOFRTHERCITYNOFRANAHEIMPRE-
~ ON ROLL CALL THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION WAS PASSED BY THE FOLLONING VOTE:
r- -~, AYES: COMMISSIONERS: A~~REO, MARCOUX~ MORRIS~ MUNGALL~ PERRY~ SUMMERS.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE.
~~~ ~~ - ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CHAIRMAN GAUER~ HAPGOOD.
RECLASSIFICATION - CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING. PErir~oN SUBMITTED sv C~ON STEELE 11a PeN-
~
E
L
r
~~ NQ. 60-61-91 - ASE
DE5CR1 ED
PROPERTY
ANAHEfMPOCALIFORN1A~oAGENT~OREQUESTING~THAT
PARCEL 1; A PARCEL 226 FEET BY 335 FEET WITH A FRONTAGE OF 335 FEET
N'AVENUEABETWEENNBEACHABOULEVARDEANDUHARDING AVENtiE~
F- COL
ITS NORTHEAST CORNER BEING APPROXIMATELY 590 FEET WEST
CH
B
EA
OF THE SOUTHWEST CORREP. OF LINCOLN AVENUE AND
~ BOULEVARD.
PARCEL 2l A PARCEL 335 FEET BY 1~OSO FEET~ 1TS NORTH BOUNDARY OF
335 FEET ABUTTING PARCEL Y ON THE SOUTH~~AND FURTHER~
' DESCRIBED.AS 3042 LINCOLN~AVENUE~
RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL ZONE 'ro THE
FROM THE R-A
~
eE RECLASSIFIED
(PARCEL 1~ nNO THE ~-3~ MULTIPLE
ON2
a
C
~
E
°'~ ,
icCE
(P
ZONE
RESBDENT~ALC
FAMILY
` SUBJECT ?ETI710N CONT.INUED FROM THE MEETING OE MAY 1~ 1961~ AN6 FROM
+~ THE MEETING OF MAY 29~ 1961 AT WHICH 71ME THE PETITION FAILED TO
a ~'J,r : ~
,~~1~~` : ~ . .
ACHIEVE A MAJORITY VOTE FOR DENIA.:
~'
.`..i.: `.'.,':, .. .. :.., . .. .... '. _. .
V~!
~ i
i
. . .. . ~ .. ~ ~ . . - ~~.
203
F
~ HIWUTES, CITY PU1NNiNG COMhi1SStON, JuNe 12, 1961~ CONTINUED:
~ ~ RECLASSlFiCAT;ON - A PLANNI.NG UEPARTMENT.STUDY WAS REQL}ESTED BY TNE COMMI.SSION~ TO BE PRE-
~ ~ NO. 60-61-91 PARED AND SUBMITTED A7 THE 61EETtNG OF JUNE 12~ 1961~ INCORPORATI.Na A
CONTINUED PRECI.SE PLAN FOR DEVELOPMENT QF THAT AREA BOUNDED BY BEACN BOUL.^VARD ON
~•
' ~
I
~
. ;
R '~ ~
j
~ ..:;,~.~.
RECLASSIFICATION
I~LO. 60-61-103
THE EASJ~ TRAC7 N0. 2611 AND TRAC7 N0. 403 ON THE WEST~ LINCOLN.AVENUE
ON THE NORTH~ AND THE ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT CHANNEL :N
THE SOUTH.
THE COMMISSION NAS INFORMED THAT THE PRECISE PLAN STUDY WOULD BE AVAIL~
ABLE FOR COMMISSION CONSIDERATION LATC•R IN THE MEE71N~ AND I.T MAS
REQUESTED THAT THE MATTER Bk HELD TEMPORARILY IN ABEYANCE. .
V1CE CHAIRMAN MORRIS ADVISED THE AUDIENCE.THAT PETITlON FOR RECLASSI-
F1CItT10~~ N0. 60-61-91 AND THE TENTATtVE MAP OF TRACT N0. 4230 WOULD BE
HELD IN ABEYANCE UNTIL LATER 1N THE MEE7ING.
- PUBL1~ HEARfNG.. PETI.TION SUBM177'ED ev TOMLEV 1NCORPORATED 223 Ensr
MANVLLLE STREET~ COMP70N~ CALI,FORN.IA~ OWNER~ A LEVINSON, 22~L EAST
MANVILLE•STREETt ~OMPTONt CALIFORNJ,A~ AGENT~ REQUEST~NG THAT PROPERTY
DESCRIBED A5: A PARCEL y16 FEET BY 1~242 FEET W(TH A FRONTAf3E OF 916
FCET ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF LA PALMA AVENUE BETWEEN GROVE STREET AND
DOWLING STREET AND EXTENDING SOUTHERLY TO THE RfVERSIDE FREEYIAYy JTS
NORTHEASTERLY CORNER BE~NG APPROXIMATELY 1~180 FEET WEST OF THE SOU7H-
WESTERLY CORNER OF LA PALMA AVENUE AND GROVE STREET, EXCEPTINa A
PARCEL 120 FEET BY 180 FEET WITH A FRONTAGE OF I20 FEET ON THE•SOUTH
S1DE OF LA PALMA AVENUE BETMEEN GROVE AND DONLING STREETS~ ITS NORTH-
EASTERLY CORNER BEIN~ APPROXIMATELY 1~670 FEET WEST OF THE SOUTHWESTER-
LY CORNER OF LA PALMA AVENUE AND GROVE STREET BE RECLASSIFIED FROM THE
R-A RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL ZONE ro THE P-t~ PARKING LANDSCAPiNG,
ZON~ AND THE M-1, ~1GHT MANUFdCTURiNG~ ZONE.
THE PE71.TlONER WAS PRESENT AND INDICA7ED HE HAD NOTHING 70 ADD TO THE
fNFORMATI.ON CON7AONED IN THE SUBJECT PETITION.
THE HEARING WAS CLOSED.
THE COMMISSION REVtENE6 A$URVEY MAP OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY~ AND DIS-
CUSSED THE LOCATION OF A 57XTY FOOT COLLECiOR STREET~ AS INDOCATED ON
THE CIRCULATIAN ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN' ABUTTING THE RlVER51DE
FREEWAY ON THE SOUTHERLY 90UNDARY OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. THE COMMIS-
SION NOTED THAT PLO? AND ELEVATION PLANS WERE NOT SUBMITTE~ WITH THE
SUBJECT PETITI.ON~ AND THAT THE ESTABI.lSHMENT OF THE P-L, PARKIAG LANDS-
CAPJ.NG~ ZONE WOULD RE~UI.RE COMPLil~NCE W1TH THE C7TY~5 LANDSCAPJNG RE~
QUI'REMENTS AND HOULD NECESSITA7E ApPROVAL OF LANDSCAPING PLANS BY THE
SUPERINTENDENT OF PARKWAY MAINTENANCE.
THE COMMlS510N FOUND AND DETERMONED THE FOLLOWI.NG FACTS REOARDING THE
SUBJECT PETITION:
1. THAT YHE PETITIONER PROPOSES A RECLA551FlCATION OF THE ABOVE DES-
CRt,BED PROPER7Y FROM THE R-A~ RE59.DENTtAL AGRICUL7URAL~. ZONE AS
FOLLOWS;
A STRJP OF LAND 50 FEET ~.N QEPTH~ AF7ER DEDICATION~ ABUTTING
AND PARALLEL TO THE PLANNED HI.GHWAY RJ,GHT-OF-WAY LINE ON LA
PALMA AVENUE SHALL BE 1.NCORPORATED JN THE P-L, PARKING LANDS-
CAPIN6, ZONE~ AND
THE BALANCE OF SAID PROPERTY SHALL BE tNCORPORATED IN THE
M-i, LIGHT MANUFACTURING, 20NE.
2. THAT THE PROPOSED RECLA551,FICATI.ON OF SUBJECT PROPERTY I~ NECESSARY
OR DESIRABLE FOR THE ORDERLY AND PROPER DEYELOPMENT OF THE COMMUNITir.
3~. THAT THE PROPOSED RECLASSI.FICATI,ON OF SUBJECT PROPERTY DOES PROPERLY
RELATE TO THE ZONES AND THEiR PERMITTED USES LOCALLY E57ABLISHED I.N
CLOSE PROXI.MITY TO SUBJECT PROPERYY AND TO THE ZONES AND THEIR PER-
MITTED USES QENERALLY ESTABLI.SHED THROUGHOUT THE COMMUNJTY.
4. THAT THE PROPOSED RECLASSIFJ.CATION OF :JBJEC7 PROPERTY DOES REQUIRE
DEDICATIAN FOR AND STANDARQ 1N1pROVEMENT OF ABUTTING 5'fREETS BECAUSE
SAID PROPERTY DOES RELATE TO AND AP,U7 UPON STREETS AND HIGHWAYS
WHICN ARE PROPOSED TO CARRY THE TYPE AND QUANTITY OF TRAFFIC~ WHICH
WILL BE GENERATED BY THE PERM177'ED USES~ IN ACCORDANCE MITH THE
CIRCULATJ,ON ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN.
5. THAT THE PROPOSED RECCASSI,FICATAON IS IN CONFORMANCE W1TH THE PRO-
.~ECT~D D'cVELOPMENT OF THE NORTHEAST INDUSTRIAL AREA AS iNDJCATED ON
TNE GENERA~ PCAN.
6. THAT NO ONE APPEARED IN OPPOSOTION TO SUBJECT PET,ITION.
COMMISSJONER MARCOUX OFFERED RESOLUTlQN`N0. 280~ SERIES 1960-61~ AND
MOVED FOR IT5 PASSAGE AND ADOPTlONo SECONDED BY COMM.ISSIONER PERRY~
RECOMMEND.INa TO THE CITV COUNCJL THAT PETIT.ION F~2 REC~ASSIFICATI.ON
• N0. 60~61-103 BE GRANTED~ SUBJECT TO 'T!~IE FOLLOWING CONDJTIONS;
1. JEUICATION OF.;i3 FEET FROM°THE MONUMENTEU CENTERLINE OF LA PALMA
AVENUE (20 FEEY EXI.STING~.,
.~;••'~'..~-~- , ., .. 1. - . .. „ r.-:.~.,,. ~i..,..... ',~+ :;3A~ ~F3t.*:..fSaP.,o. o.~ ,. .. . .t...
Q
~J
,` ~e
204
tlINUiES. ClTY PL41NN1NG COMMISSION, JuNe 12, 1961, CONTDNUED;
RECI,ASSIF{CATION ~ 2. DEDJ:CATION OF 60 FEE7 FOR A SERVlCE ROAD ALON(i THE RIYERSI.DE
NO. 60-61-103 FREEWAY.
CONTINUED
3. PREPARATION OF STREET LMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR LA PALNA AYENUE AND THE
SEitVICE ROAD AND.THE LNSTALLATION OF ALL 1MPROVEMEN75 Y.N ACCORDANCE
N'CTH APPROVED STANDARD PLANS ON FILE !N THE.OFFICE OF 7HE C17Y
ENQI,NEER AT THE 71ME OF DEVELOPMEN7.
4~. PAYMENT OF•=2.00 PER FRON7 F00T FOR STREET LlaH7lNQ PURPOSES AT
7HE 7iNE OF DEVELOPMENT FOR LA PALMA QVENUE AND THE SERVICE ROAD~
OR THE I.NSiALLA710N OF 57REE7 L1.~HTS AT THE 71'.ME OF DEVELOPMEN7 AS
APPROVED BY THE DIRECTOR OF PUBL,I.C UTALITI.ES.
5. PROVJSlON OF UTILl.TY EASEMENTS ALONQ 6XTER10R BOUNDARiES AS DETER~
M1NED BY 7HE DI,RECTOR~ OF PUBL7C UT1L1;TjE5. •
6. Ty:ME LiMITATtON OF NiP~B7Y (90) DAYS FOR THE ACCOMPLISHMEHT OF ITEM
NOS. 1~ 2~ AND 5. •
7. PROVISLON OF A F1.F7Y (50) FOOT LANDSCAPED STRIP ABUTTl.NB THE pLANEIED
HLQHMAY RIQHT-OF-WAY•LANE OF SUBJECT PROPERTY~EXCEPT FOR ACCESB
DRI'VES GR WALKS. PLANS FOR SAID LANDSCAP,lN~ AND MATER SUPPLY SYSTEM
SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE APPRpVAL OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF PARKWAY
MAIN7ENANCE.
THE FOREQO~Na CONDj7~1.ONS MERE RECITED AT THE MEETINQ AND MERE FOUND•TO
BE A NECESSARY PREREQUI.S.I.TE TO THE USE OF xHE PROPERTY )N ORDER 70 PRE-
SERYE•iHE SAFETY AND WELFARE OF THE.bIT1ZEN5 OF•THE ~ITY OF ANAHEIA.
ON ROLL CAIL THE FOREQOANG R6506UTJON MAS PASSED.BY-THE•FOLtOM~;N& V07EC
AYES: COMMlSS10NERS: ALLRED~ MARCOUX~ MORR15~ MUNaALL~ PERRY~ SUMMERS.
NOES: COMM1SS10NERS: NONE. .
IIBSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CHAI,RMAN GAUER~ HAPGOOD.
RECLASSIFICATION - RUBLIC HEARING. PETI,TI.ON ~NiT1AjED BY FHE ClTX PLANNING COMMISSION FoR ~
~. 60~61-104 PROPERTY DESCRIBED A5: A PARCEL 120 FEET HY 180 FEET WLTH A FRONTAQE
OF 120 FEET ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF LA PALMA AVENUE BETWEEN GROVE AND
DOMLI,N~ STREE75~ ITS NORTHEA57ERLY CORNER BEINQ APPROXJ,NA7'ELY 1~670
FEET WES7 OF THE SOUTHWEST6RLY CORNER OF LA PALMA AVENUE AND CaROVE ?
S7REET BE RECLASSIFIED FROM THE R-Ao RESID6NTIAL AGRICULTURAL ZONE 70
rME P-t~ PARKING LANDSCAPaNG~ ZONE nrta THE M-i. LIQHT MANUFACTl~R11dG,
ZONE. '
SUBJECT PROPERTY [S SURROUNDED HY THE SUBJEC~ PROPERTY CONTAINED IN
PE71T~.ON FOR RECLASS,LFICATI.ON N0.60~61~103 AND MAY BE DEYELOPED MIHEN~ +
EVER COHD1,Tl.ONS ATTACHED TO THE RECLASSIFLCA71'ON ARE CONPLLED MITH.
THE HEARING MAS CLOSED. '
THE COMM1881.ON DI,SCUSSED THE RECOMMENDA7LON BY THE INTERDEPARTMENTAL
COMMLTTEE RELA7],VE TO 7HE NLNETY DAY 7~ME LfN1.TATlON FOR THE OEDICATION
OF 33 FEET ALONQ LA PALMA AVENUE AND 1T WAS N07ED THAT 7HE 71ME LIMITA-
T10N NAY BE REVI.SED 8Y TME ClTY COUNCI.L.
THE COMM.1,85~ON FOUND AND DE7ERMI,NED THE FOLLOWI,NQ FACTS REQARD7N~ THE
BUBJECT PE71,TfON2 '
1. THA7 7HE PET17lONER PROPOSES A R~CLASSlF1CA'f10N OE THE ABOVE DES- ,
• CRiBED PROPER7Y FROM 7HE R~A~ RESI:DEN7IAL AQRI.CUL7•JRAL~ ZONE AS ,
FOLLOMS.
A BTRIP OF LAND F~.F7Y (50~ FEET iN DEPTH~ AtTyR DEDl;CATJUt~~
ABU7TiNa AND PARALLEL TO THE PLANNED H1~iHMAY R;~Ht-OF~WAY
PARKING LANDSCAPINGENZONEpAati~ E 1'NCORPORATED IN THE P~L~ .
THE BAIANCE OF SALD PROPERTY SHALL BE INCORPORATED JN THE
. Mai, LIGHT MANUFACTURING~ ~ONE.
2. THAT 7NE PROPOSED RECLASSiFf.CA710N OF SUBJECT PROPEF7Y 1,5 NECESSARY
OR DESJRABI.E FOR THE ORDERLY AND pROPER DEYELOPMEHT flF TNE COMMUNI7Y.
3i THAT THE PROPOSED RECLASSIF(CATION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY DOES PROPERLY
RELATE TO THE ZONES AND THEIR pERMITTED USES IOCALLY ESTA8L7;SHED J,N
CLOSE PROXIMIT,Y TO SUBJECT PROPERTY AND TO tHE ZONES. AND 7HEIR PER~
M.I.T7ED USES ~ENERALLY ESTABLISHED 7HROUQHOU7 7HE COMMJ~N~TY.
, r. .
4y TH~r THE PR~POSED RECLASSI~ICA7lON OF SUBJECT PROPER7Y DOES REQUIRE
DEDI,CATI,ON FOR AND STANDARD I;MPROVEMENT OF A8UT71,N~ 57REET5 BECAUSE
SA1,D PROPER~Y DOES RELATE TO AND hBUT UPON STREETS AND HIaHWAYS
MH1CH ARE PROPOSED TO CARRY 7HE 7YPE AND QUANT~TY OF 7RAFFI.C~ WH'1CH
~ NLLL BE QENERATED BY THE PERMI.TTED USES~ IN ACCORDANCE.WI,7H THE
• CIRCULA7~ON ELENENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN.
• ^
_ _..._ ~. _.._ _ ,..~ ..~F ,
T ~
__-~ ~. ~,''.. ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ... . , . . .i;. . . . . ..'~`?`~. ...~ ~i:_.._.._ .... . . .. t.. _.. .._._._w
. ' . .
~ - ' ~~''~ Y' .
'~
,
~ .. ~ . ~ ~. 'y . .
. ,
1!i ,
I `
.
-" 1 ! ~
I ~'i
W~Vtl.~r.a . ..
.
~
---~'S'
~../ .
.
. .
.. . . . . ~. . . ~ ~ .~.
2~5
: I . ~
E' ~ ~
~ ~ MINUTES•,.CITY PLANNING COMMISSION, JuNe 12~ 1961, CONTANUED: ~
ASSIFICATION -
RECI 5. THA7 TNE PROPOSED RECLASSJ.Ff.CATO.ON 15 LN CONFOR)dANCE WITH THE PRO- ~
.
NO. 60~61-104 JECTED DEdELOPMENT OF 7HE NOR7HEA57 INDUSTRI.AL AREA AS INDICATED ;
CONTINUED ON THE GENERAL PLAN. • i
6. THAT NO ONE APPEARED 1N OPP051710N TO SUB:JECT PETITI.ON.
• ~ COMMISSDONER ALLRED OFFEREQ RESOLU7I,ON N0. 281~ SERIES 1960~61~ AND 1
, {
SSIONER MUNGALL
I
DED BY COMM
~
,
.
MOVED FOR I.TS PASSA~E AND ADOPTI:ON~ SECON
RECOMMENDING 70 THE CITY COUNCtL THAT PETITJON FOR RECLASSIFICATION
N0. 60~61~104 BE GRANTED~ SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWIN~ CONDITIONSI
I l: DEDLCATION OF 53 FEET F°OM.THE MONUMENiED CENTERLINE OF LA PALMA
1 AYENUE (20 FEET EXLSTl,N~).
2. PREPARATYON OF STREET LMPROYEMENT PLANS AND INSTALLATl,ON OF Alt ~
IMPROVEMENTS~ ~N ACCORDANCE WITH APPROVED PLANS ON FILE IN THE
GG ~
OFFICE OF TME CITY-•ENGINEER~ AT TIME OF DEVELOPMENT. •
~ 3. PAYMENT OF 52.00 PER FRON7 FOOY FOR STREET LIGNTINfi PURPOSES AT
~ ~
TIME OF DEVELOPMEN7 OR I.NSTALLATION OF STREET LI.GHTS AT TIME OF
ES.
TI
CTOR OF PUBLIC UTILI
D
.
.
IRE
DEVELOPMEN7 AS A°PROVED BY THE
4: TLME LIMITATION OF NI.kETV (90~ DAYS FpR THE ACCOMPLI.SHMENT OF ITEM ~
N0. 1 OR LN ACCORDANCE Wl,TH THE TIME LIMI,TATION STIPULATED BY THE
CITY COUNCLL. ~
~ 5. PROVISION OF A F-FTY (50~ F00T LANDSCAPED STRI.P ABUTTIN~ THE PLANNED ~
HIOHWAY RLQHT~-OF-WAY LINE OF SUBJECT PROPERT•Y~ EXCEPI' FOR ACCESS
~
DRLVES OR MALKS. PLANS FOR SAID LANDSCAPIN~ AND WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM
SHALL BE SUBJEC7 Tv iHE APPROVAL OF THE SUPERIHTENDEN? OF PARKYIAY
MAIN7ENANCE.
~
THE FOREDOO.NQ CONDOTO.ONS WERE RECQTED AT THE MEE7'lNQ AND WERE FOUND TO
~ BE A NECESSARY PREREQl7Q:+lYE TO THE USE OF THE PROPERTY IN OR~ER TO
OF THE CITY UF
PRESERVE THE SAFETY AND fiENERAt WF_:.FARE OF THE CITL2EN5
~ ~
ANAHEIM.
ON ROLL CALL TNE FORE~OINCi RESOLUT~ON MAS PABSED BY THE FOLLOWINQ VOTE: ~
AYES: COMMISSIONERSt ALLRED~ MARCOUX~ MORk0.5~ MUNOALL~ PERRY~ SUMMERS. '
NOES: COMMISSIONERSS NONE. •'
ABSENTI COMMISSIONERS: CNAIRMAN GAUERy HAPQOOD.
PUBLIC HEARlNG. PETOTION sueM~rreo ev THERESIA KITTELBER6ER. 516 BRUCE
STREET ANAHEIMo CALIFORNIA~ OWNER~ REQUESTIN~ PERMISSION To, EXPAND AN
EXISTI~JG SECOND UNIT ON PROPERTY DESCRIBED A5: A PARCEI 50 FEET BY 109
FEET WOTH A FRONTAOE OF 50 FEET ON EMILY STREET AND LOCATED ON THE WEST
SIDE OF EMILY STREET BETWEEN WATER AND SOUTH S7REET5~ ITS SOUTHEAST
CORNER BEINO APPROXIMAYELY 50 FEET NORTH OF THE NORTHNEST CORNER OF
PROPERTYDPRESENTLYRCLASSIFIEDURT1oRONESFAMILY RESIDENTIQLH ZONEY $TREET.
MR. W. G. MANIONo 710 SOUTH EOtILY STREET~ APPEARED BEFORE THE COMMISSION~
SUBMITTED A PETi71ON OF PROTEST SOQNED BY FORTY OWNERS OF PROPERTY IN
THE AREA~ AND STATED Hi5 OPPOSITION TO THE SUBJECT PETITION. MR. MANION
COMPLAINED ABOUT THE PRESENi CONDfT10N OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND
STATED THAT AT THE PRESENT TIME SEVEN PEOPLE WERE LIV~NO IN THE FRONT
DWELL1h3 WNICH HE CONSIDERED T00 MANY FOR ';HE S12E OF THE PROPERTY. HE
ALSO STA7E0 THAT THE OTHER PROPERTIES IN ".HE NEIOHBORHOOD WERE WELL MAIN-
TAINED~ THAT OARA~ES WERE PROVIDED AND CARS WERE NOt PARKED ON TNE
STREET~ THAT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY WAS NOT WELL MAINTAINED~ AND THAT THE
PURPOSES WOULDRENCOURAQEH7HEAUSEEOFNTHEESTREETSTFOR~PARKI.NG PURPOSESNTIAL
WHlCH WOULD RESULT IN 7RAFFIC CON6ESTION.
MRS. KITTELBER~ER~S DAUGHTER APPEARED BEFORE THE COMMISSION~ REPRESENT-
INQ HER MOTHER. SHE INDICATED YHAi' AT THE PRESENT S1ME MRS. KITTELBEROER
WAS LIVINCi WITH HER AT 516 BRUCE STREET~ AND THAT THE VARIANCE WAS RE-
QUESTED IN ORDER TO PERMIT THE CONVERSION AND EXPANSI.ON OF AN EXISTINa
SECOND DWELLINa AND QARADE FOR RESIDENTIAL USE BY MRS. KITTELBER6ER.
SHE STATED THAT HER MOTMER NEEDED THE DWELLINO IN ORDER TO:SUPPLEMENT
HER INCOME BY LIVIN~ ON THE REAR OF THE PROPERTY AND RENTIN(3 THE DWEL~~
(NO ON THE FRONT OF THE PROPERTY. SHE STATED FURTHER TMAT ~F NER
MOTHER LtVED ON THE PROPERTY IT WOULD BE PROPERIY MAINTAINED AND SUPER~
VISED~ T.HAT A CARPOR,T WOULD BE PROV~DED FOR OFF~STREE7 PARKING~ THAT
NO EXTERIOR CHANQES WERE PLANNEDo AND THAT THERE WAS A TWO FAMILY RESI-
DENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IMMEDIATEI:Y TO THE SOUTH OF SUBJECT PROPERTY.
A PETITION IN FAVOR OF THE SUBJECT PETITION~ CONTAININti FOUR SIaNATURES~
qAS PREBEN7ED TO THE COMM(SSI.ON.
MR. R. NY80E~ 220 EAST SOUTH SiREE7~ APPEARED BEFORE THE COMMISSION~
STATED HIB OPPOSITION TO THE SUBJECT P~TITION~ AND REVIEWED THE HISTORY.
REARHOFSTHEEPROPERTYRTYITN~A45NOTED THA7ETHERSTRUCTURERWASDEREC7ED THE
---------_..-_.~_. -
~ . .
. -,-.. ..:. ~,
~~. . ,. .,, ~
.. ...: ~. . . , .;i: ,.. ...
~ '
~ ..
~
MiNUTES, CITY PLANNING COMMISSION, JUNE 12, 196~, 4oN:~NUkD;
VARIANCE N0. 1370 - DURING THE WAR FOR 'fEMPORARY RGSIDENYIAL USE WITH THE PROVISION THAT
CONTINUED IT BE ABANDONED WHEN THE EMERGENCY H.4D CEASF_9. HQWEVER~ 'CkE Sl'RUCTURE
COULD BE UY7L~IZED FOR A WORKSHOP OP. FUR STORAGE.
THE HEARiN6 WAS CtOSED,
THE COMMISSION NOTED THAT TNE HOMES SURROUNDING iHE SU9JECT PROPERTY
~ PRESENYED A GOOD APpEARANCEo WF.RE WE.L~ M.4iN'CAiNED~ AND WERE IN GOOD
CONDIT~ON. ..
THE COMMISSION FOUND AND DF_YERMINED Ti1E FGII.OW7NG FACTS REGARDING THE
SUBJECT PET6TION:
1. THAT THE PET0710NER REQUESTS A VAR7ANCE ~ROM TH5 QNAHEIM MUN7CIPAL
~ CODE~ SECTION 18.24.O1U TO PERMI'f THE EXPANSION OF A SECOND~DWELL-
ING UNET ON SUBJECI' PROPERTY~ SE:CT~OY 18.24.030(3) TO PERMIT
ENCROACHMENT OF 21 FEEI' IN~O~iHE REQU~RED P,EAR YARD9 SECTOON
, 18.24.030 (4-B) TO PERMIT L07 AREA OF'~2~7?_5 SQUARE FEET PER DWELL-
lIJG UNI'C~ P.ND ~ECT70N 18.80.080 70 PERM7T THE ESTABLOSHMENT OF A
DWELLING UNlT CONTA~N7NG A l.1VEABLE ~LOOR AREA QF 623 SQUARE FEET.
2. THAT TNE REQUES')'ED VARpANCE 416LL 6E MATER;AL:.Y DETR~MENTAL TO THE
PUBLIC WELFARE OR 9NJUR~OliS TO 7HE PROPER'fY OR 3MPROVEMENTS IN
SUCH VIClNlTY AIvD Z.ON6 IN W4;CH THE PROPERTY 75 LOCATED. ~
~ 3„ THA7 THE REQUESTED VAR6.4NCE W~LI. ADVERSELY AFFECT THE COMPREHEN-
SIVE GENEP.AL. Pt.AN.
4. TNAT l'Fi~ EXiST;NG STRLiC':iiRE ON 'iHF. R.E.4R GF THE 5UBJECT PROPERTY IS
~ NOT SUETABIE F'OR RESL~E:N1'IAi. PURPOSES AND SHOULD BE ABANOONED.
5. TNA7 THE ?ROPOSED SEC6ND DWELL.iNG UNI':' +lOULD CONTAiN AN ~NSUFFI-
CIENT AMOUN~F OF L.~VFABLE f~:.OpR SPACE.
6. THAT VERBAL OPPCSi'~OQNp IN ADpi:10N :'O A PF.TIY~ON OF PRO1'EST CON-•
~AlNINCa FORTY SIGNAYL'RF.Sp WAS R£CORDED ACaA:NS'i SUBJEC'F PETiTlON.
7. THAT A PE°1'!'OON OF SS1PpOR'Co CON'iAINING FOUR S~GNATi)RESp WAS RECORDED
ili FAVOR OF SJBJFCS PE.T{FDON.
COMMISSiONER MARCOUX Of'C'ERED RGSQW'siON Nn. 282o SERIES 1960~61~ AND
MOVED FOR ITS PASSAGE AN7 ,4DOP;lON' SE:CONDED RY CtlMMIS5I0NER ALLRED 70
~ DENY PETITION FOR ~ARIANCE NU. 131G` QN THE BA505 UF THE AFOREME:NTIONED
FINDIpGS.
Ok ROLL CAi.L THE FOREC~OOPIG' RESOLUTIUN wA5 PASSEQ BY THE FOlLO~liNG VOTE:
AYES: COMMISSIONEftS: ALS_RED~ ~ARCOIJ:io MORRISo MUNGA1.Lo PERRY~ SUMMERS.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NowE.
ABSENT: COMMISStONERS: CH~~IRMAN GAUF.ft~ HAPGOOD.
VARIANCE N0. i;71 - PUBLIC HEARING. PETITION suaM;T'fED ar DONALD F. REA' ET AL~ 305 Ensr
17TH. STREET SANTA ANA C.4~lFOF.NIAo OWNERo REQUESTiNG PERM155i0N TO
CONSTRUCT APdRTMENT - MbTEL UNBTS on PROPER'('Y DESCRIBED As: AN IRREGU-
LAR SHAPED pARCEL. WITH A FRC~iAGE Of 60 FEE7' ON KATELLA AVENUE AND
LOCATED ON THE NOkT:i SIDE: UF KATEL.LA Ab'ENUE BEZWEEN HARBOR BOUL~VARD
AND CLEMENTINE STREE7'~ ITS SOUTHWEST CORNEP. BElNG APPROXIMATELY 1~030
FEET EAST pF THE NJRTHEAS'i CORhER OF' HARBOP. BOULEVARD AND KATELLA AVE-
qUE AND FUP.THER DESCRIBED AS 355 WEST KATELLA AVENUE. PROPERiY PRESENTLY
CLASSIFIED R-A, RESIDENTIAL AGRlfULTURAL, ZONE,
. THE PE7ITIONER WAS NOT PRESENT. 7'HE HEARING WAS CLOSED.
THE COMMISSION NOTED THAT DEVELOPMENY PL.ANS INDOCATE A SIXTY FOqT STREET
FOR ACCESS TO THE SUBSECT PROPERTY AND THAi NO INFORMATION RELATIVE TO
DEDICATlON OF FHE STREET WAS SUBMlTTFD W17H THC SUBJECT PETITiON. IT
WAS ALSO NOTED THAT A PET7'ilON FOR VARlANCE N0. 1314 HAD BEEN APPROVED
FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
COMMISSIONER ALLRED OFfERED A MOTOON~ SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER MUNGALL
AND CARRIED~ 1'HA7 PEYt7'iON FOR VARfANCE N0. 1371 BE CONTINUED UNTIL THE
MEETING OF JUNE 26~ 1961 SO 'CHAT THE PE71TtONER COULD BE PRESENT TO
, STATE HIS INTENTlONS IN RESPECT TO THE DEVEI.OPMENT OF SUBJECT PROPcRTY'
' AND.THAT INFORMATION R.ELATIYE TO PETfT10N FOR VARIANCE N0. 1314 CpULD BE
` SUBMITTED AT THAT TIME.
,k CONDITIONAL USE - PUBLIC HEARING. PETITION SUBMlTTED.BY ARTHUR G. AND KATHERINE C. NEI~-
" PER NO. 127„ - WANGER, 821 EUCLID AVENUE .-1NAHEiMy CA~IFORNiA~ OWNE:RSo REQUESTING
~:^~~~~ PertMisstoN ro OPERATE AP~E-SCHOOI DAY NURSERY ON PROPERTY'DESCRIBED A5;
~' A PARCEL 61 FEET BY lO1 FF.ET'WITH A FRONTACE,OF 61 FEET ON CATHERINF.
~S~t~A; DRIVE BETWEEN EUCLID AYENUE AND;DRESDEN.;STREET; !FS NORTHWEST CORNER
~`~~,~,~ BE1NG APPROXEMATELY 63 FEET BAST OF THE SOUTHEhSS C.ORNFR Op ~UCI.ID AVE~
?~rs;s~: NUE AND CA7HEP.iNE DRlVE~ AND~pUR'fHER DESCRIBED AS 1632 CATHERINE DRIVE.
PROPERTY PRESENTLY CLASSIFIEq R'-1,,ONE FAMILY RESIDENTIALa.ZONE.
` ~ .
, ;
;.r.~.~~ `' n ....~ r~.:~.^ i ~ l -.-'^•"' I .
. . L.} ~.. 1',::~. k., fS ... ... . . ~ .:}.r:i:. ,..... . , .. _ . . . . . ..... .4\. . .. fi `~~:%Y'J .. i. .4,1~Y,.t ~~.i' . .. . . . _ . ... -
+' . ~ .:
._t.~~.,i.. .. . .__ _. _~ .
~ ~
W
n ~
~ ~ MINUTES~ CITY PLAI'NING COMMISSlON, Jurte 12, 1961~ CONTiF1UED;
& ~ ::
~' _~~. ~
~~r ~y''
t~M- :w
~
~' ~i.'
~'
~ ~ .~,
, ~ .
20~
COMDITIONAL USE ~ MR. ARTHUR NEISWF.NGERo THE PETITI.ONER~ APPEARED BEFaRE THE COMMISSION
PERMIT V0. I27 AND DESCRIBED tHE PROPOSED EXPANSION OF AN EXlSTING DAY NURSERY.
CONTINUED
THE HEARING•WAS CtOSED. •
THE COHMISSION REVIEWED DEVELOPMENS PLANS AND D75CUSSEO THE PROPOSfD
CONNECTION OF AN ADJOIRiNG SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE TO TNE EXISTINf3
KIDDIE•KORNER NURSERY SCHOOL. THE PETITIONER IND{CATED THAT THE RESl~
~
DENCE WOULD BE CONVERTED~ 7HAT 3ATHROOM AN: KITCHEN.FACILlT4E5 MOULD BE
BE ADDED~ THAT ADDI'i'IONAL PLAY6ROUND EQUIPMENT MAY BE INSTALLED~ ANG
THAT.THE DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL WELFARE WOULO MAINTAIN CONTROL AND SUPER-
ViS10N OF SA10 ESTABLISH~tENiG~.
THE•COMM15510N DISCUSSED THE PE'[ITI~NER~S PLOT PIAN AND NOTED THAT THE
DEVELOPMENT WAS NOT CONFINED ENTIRELY TO TNE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND THAT
IT INCLUDED THE PROPF.RTY A9UTTONG SUBJECT ?ROPERTY TO iHE WEST. ••THE
PETITIONER WAS ADVISED THAT THE SUBSECT PETITION WAS INADEQUATEo THAT
' A COMPLETE•LEQAI. DESCRIP'tON AND PLOT PIAN INCORPORATING BOTH~PARCELS
INTO A SINOLE INTEGRAI'ED 'JNIT WOULD BE NECESSARY FOR COMMISSION CONS1~
DERATI~N~ AND THAT A DIRECTION SHEET FOR PREPARING ADEQUATE PLOT PI~ANS
MAS.AVAILA9LE TO THE PET~TIONER IN TME PLANNING DEPARTMENT..~
COMMISSIONER QLLRED OFFERED A MOTION~ SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER PERRY
• AND CARRIED~ THAT•PETITiON FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0.•127 ~E CON~
~ TINUED~ TMAT THE PETITIONER SUBM!T LEQAL ESCRIPTION AND A COMPLETE
PLOT PLAN INCORPORATIN(i LOTS 18 ANO 19 OF•:RACT N0. 2161•7NT0 AN IN-
' TE~RATED UNIT~ AND THAT THE PETITION BC READVERTISED INCORPORATI.NG
BOTH PARCELS AND SET FOR PUBLIC HEARIN(3 ON JULY 10~ 1961.
CONDITIONAL USE . ~ PUBLIC HEARING. PE40TlON SUBMISTEO ev RCBERT H. GRANT, Box 2067~
PERMlT N0. 128 ANAHEIM~ CALIFORNIA~ OWNER~ JOHN PR1NS~ P. O. BOX 2067 ANAHE~M CALI-
Af10N
~
I
'
ON
V
CE ST
[t!!~ PERMISSION TO ESTABLISH A SEI
FORNIA~ ADENT~ RBQUES
PROPERTY DES•CRIBED A5: AN IRREpULAR SHAPED PARCEL N~TM A DE?TH OF 219
FEET AND AN AVERAQE WIDTH OF 46J FEEY WITH A FRONTAOE OF 450 FEET ON
BROOKHURST STREET~ AND LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BROOKNURST
STREE7 AND CRE37WOOD LANE~ AND FURTHER DESCRtBED AS 1731 SOUTH BROOK~
HURST STREET. PROPERTY PRESENTLY CLASSIFI6D C^lo NEIGHBORHOOD COMMER~
CIAL, ZONE.
MR. ~OHN PRlt18~ 1565 SOUTH BROQKHURST STREET~ ADENT FOR 7HE ?ETITIONER~
APPEARED BlFORE THE COMMISSION~ DIESCRIBED THE PROPOSEO ~NSTAILATI~N CF
'. A SEASIDE Sf~Y1CE S7A710N~ AND SUBMITTED MAPS AND A I.ETTER CLARIFYIN~
THE LOCATlOk QF ?HE PROPOS~D SERYICE S'fAiION. MR. PRINS STATED THAT
THE BERVICE 5'iATION WOULD DISPENSE OAS AND OI.L QNLY AND WOULD HAVE NO
FACIL4TIES FOR REPAIRS AND I.UBRICATION. HE NOTED TNAT THE PROPOSER
9ERVICE STA'~ION WOULD BE LOCATED ON THE SOUTH POR'f10N OF AN EXISTINO
. COMMBRCIAI. D6VELOPM~NS ABllTTINO A CONCRETE DRAINA~E DITCH~ ANO THAT AOJA~
,
. CENT PROPERTY ACR084 7NE DRAINAQE D1,TCH ON THE BOlfTH WOULD BE DEVELOPED
FaR COMMERCIAL PURp08ES AND WpULD COMPL.ETE iHE SSREET iMPROYEMENT PRO~
ORAM FOR THAT AREA. MR. PRINS STATED 7HA?'THE PE:TITION6R DID NOT HAVE
PLANS FOR DEVELOPMENT OF THE 100 f00F PARCEL BEHIND'THE PROPOSED SERVICE
STATION~ THAT IT WOULD NOT BE DEVELOPED FOR A OARA~E~ AND THAT IT WOULD
REMAIN AS A BUFFER FROM THE RESIDEN7IAL DEVELOPMENT 70 TiiE WF.ST.
TH~ COMM13810N DIBCUSSED 1NE LOCATION OF SHE CANOPY AND MR. PRINS INDi~
CATED iNAT THE OIL COMPANY PREPARED THE PLANB AND TNAT THEY ~MIQHT HAVE
CQNSIDERED tT FEASIBLE TO BET THE DEVELOPMEN1' BACK FURTHER ON TNE PRO"
• PERTY I.F THE PROPERTY SOUTHERLY OF THE DRAINAGE DITCH HAD BEEN DEYELOPED~
• THAT TME PROPGSED SETBACK FROM TNF_ STREET WOULD BE COMPATIBLE WITH THE
REMAINDER OF TFfE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT~ AND THAT IT WOULD BE AN OPEN
TYPE OF STRUCTURE.
THE HEARING WAS CLOSEU. ~
TNE CtlMNI8S10N DISCl1SSED :HE LOCATION OF BLOCK WALLS~ QRADlN~ OF THE
PROPERTY~ POBSIBLE LANDSCAPINQ~ AND THE SETBACKS STIPULATED FOR THE
PROPERTY LOCATED BOUTHERLY OF SUBJECT PROPERTY. THE COMMIBSION NAS
lNFORMED 7'HAT~ RLTHOUaH THEY'HAD RECOMMENDEO A 60 FOOT SETBACK FOR
THE PRtlPERTY CONTAINED IN PE7IT;ION FOA RECLASSIFICATION N0. 60~61-53p
REViSED PLANS HAD BEEN SUBMITTED TO THE C~TY COUNCIL AND A 47 FOOT
SE79ACK HAD BEBN ESTABLISMED. THE LEDAL DESCRIPTlON SUBMITTED WITH
TME SUBJ£CT'PETITION WAB ALSO DISCUSBED AND IT WAS MOYEG ?HAT THE DES~
CR!?TION COVERED THB EYTIRE CGMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT NORTH OF THE PRO~
POSED BERVICE S7A71~'t! S17E.
TH~ CQMMISSION iOUND AND pETERMINED THE FOLLOWIN~ PACTS REOAROiN~ THE
SUBJECY PtT,IT10N: "
1. TNAT THE pROPOSED USE IS PRUPERLY ONE FOR 'rIH1CH A CONDOTIONAL USE
PBRMlT•IS AU7HORl.ZED BY TH~S•CODE~ TO WIT3 A SERVICE 5TAT40N.
2. ~MAT THE PROp05ED USE WII.L NOT ADYERSE~Y AFFECT THE ADJOINING
LANO U9~S AND 7HE QROWTH AND DEYELOPMEII? OF THE AREA ON WH1CH IT
lS PROPOSED TO BE LOCAiED.
3. .THAT IHE 81ZE AND SHAPE OF THE Sl7E PROPOSED FOR THE USE 1S ADEQUATE
TO AI.L.OW THE FULL DEYELOPMEN7 OF TH~ PROPObED U~E IN A MANhER NOT
, ~ ~~ ,•/;;
~ r -~
~ ~
. ~1 ",~~.~,: r.A f,~1.. ~~,n . y .:-~: T!, y.~:: ~:.,' ..t' ' ~, . ~ .
'~ ~ _~ . • . .. . .
, . ' ~..: ~ ~5' . .
~
~
~
~
2~8
Pi1NUTES, CITY FLANNiN~ COF9HiSSiON. JuNe 12; 1961~ CONTINUED;
CONDITiONAI USE ~ • DETRIMEN7AL TO.T.HE PARTICULAR AREA.NOR TO THE PEACE HEALTH~ SAFETY~
PERNiT N0. 128 AND GENERAL MELFARE OF THE CITIZENS.OF THE ClTY OF dNAHE1M.
CONTINUEO ' ~
4: ZMAT THE'TRAFFIC dENERATED'BY THE PROPOSED USE W~~L NOi 1MPOSE AN
UNDUE BURDEN UPON THE STREETS AND.HIGHWAYS DESIGNED AND IMPROVED TO
CARRY TNE TRAFFIC IN THE AREA.
5. TIiA7 TFIE•aRANI1Nfi OF THE COND1710NAL USE PERMIT UNDER TME CONDITIONS
IMPOSED~ IF ANY~ WILL.N07 BE DETROMENTAL TO THE PEACE~ HEALTH~
SAFETY~ AND fiENERAL WELFARE OF THE CIT12EN5 OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM.
6. THAT THE PROPOSED DEVEI.DPh1ENT.15 COMPA7IBLE WITH THE EXISTING COM~
MERCIAL bEVELOPMENT ON SUBJEC7 PROPERTY AND ALONG BROOKHURSi STREET.
7. TkAT NO ONE APPEARED IN OPPOSITION TO S~JBJECT PETtT10N.
' COMMISSEONER PIARCOUX OFFERED RESOLUTOON N0. 283~ SERIES 1960-61~ AND
MOYED'FQR ITS PASSADE AND ADOP700N~ SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SUMMERS~
TO ~RANt PETITION FOR CONDOTIONAL USE PERFAIT N0. 128~ SUHJECT TO THE
FOLIONIN6 CONDITIONS:
1. DEYELOPMEN~ SUBSTANTIALLY ON ACCORDANCE WITH PLANS PRESENTED WITH.
THE•BERVICE STATION UNIT TO BE LOCATED ON THE SOUTHERLY PORTION OF
7HE 160 FEET 9Y 219 FEEY OF•SUBJEC7 PROPERTY AND WITH THE EXCEPTION
THAT ALL STRUC7URE5 SHALL BE SETBACK NOT LE55 THAN 47 FEET FROM ?HE
• PLANNED HIGHWAY RI~KT-OF~WAY LINE.- • •
2. THAt THE SOUT.HERLY 160 FEET OF SUBJECT PROPERTY SHALL BE PAVED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH CODE RLQUIREMENiS EXCEPT FOR THOSE AREAS OCCUPIED
BY THE SERVICE STATOON STRUC?'URES. • • ~
3. THAT A TWO (2) YEAR BOND BE POSTED TO D.NSURE CpNSTRUCTLON CF A SIX '
(6~ FOOT MASONRY WALL ON THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE OF SUBJECT PROPERTY~
SAID BOND TO BE RELEASED !F PROPERTIES ABUTT1NCi ON THE SOUTH ARE
DEVELOPED FOR COMMERCIAI. PURPOSES. •
. THE FOREGOINQ CONDITIONS WERE REC~TED AT 7HE MEETINa AND WERE FOUND TO
•. B6 A NECESSARY PREREQUl51TE YO iHE USE OF THE PROPERTY IN ORDER ~0 PRE-
SERVE THE SAFETY AND WELFARE OF THE CITIZENS OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM.
ON ROLL CALI. THE FOREQ07NG RESOLUYlON WAS PASSED BY THE FOLLOWINO VOTE: ,
AYES: COMMIS.~iIONERS: ALLRED~ MARCOUX~ MORRIS~ MUNGALL~ PERRY~ SUMMERS.
~ • NQES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE.
ABSENT: COMMISSlONERS: CHAIRMAN GAUER~ HAPQOOD.
~
~
~ r .. ~~.~".
P..-.~.ui,;.,.Wd
CONDITIONAL USE - PUBI.IC HEARING. PETITION SUBMOTTED er N~CHOLAS J. AND LILLIAN DOVALIS,
PERMIT N0: 129 920 SOUTH MA~NOLIA AVENUEe ANAHEIM CAI.iFORNIA~ ONNERS~ REQUE541N0''PERI115-
s7oN ro ESTABLISH A NALK-UP RESTAU~ANT oN PROPERTY OESCRIBED as: A
PARCEL 144 FEET BY 244 FEET WITH A FRONiA4E OF 144 FEET ON MAONOLIA AVE-
NUE AND LGCATED ON '1HE EAST SIDE OF MAONOLIA AVENUE BETWEEN HEFFRON DRIYE
' AND BALL ROAD,~ ATS NORTHWE57 CORNER BEING APPROXIMATELY 100 FEET SOUTH
OF TME SOU7HEASr CORNER OF HEFFRON DRIVE AND MAQNOLlA AVENUE AND FURTHER
DBSCRIBED AS 918 SOUTH MA~NOLIA AVENUE. PROPER7Y PRESENTLY CLASSIF'~ED
C-1..NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL~ ZONE.
MR. NICHOLAS DOVALIS~ THE PETITiONER~ APPEARED BEFORE fNE COMMISSION~AND
DESCRLBED THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTiOH OF A WALK~UP F1AM8!l~GER DlSPENSING
OPERATION TO BE ES'[A8LlSHED IN AN EX75TIN0 COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT.
TWE HEARIN6 WAS CLOSED.
THE COMM1551,ON REVIEWED DEVEL~PMENT PLANS AND THE PETETIONER INDICATED '
THAT ?NE 59 FEET AT THE REAR OF 7kE SUBJECT PROPERTY WOULD NOT BE bEYEL-
OPED AND 7HAT HE D~D NOT HAVE ANY P!,ANS FOR LTS DEVELOPMENT IN THE FUTURE.
THE COMMISSION REVIEWED THE PARK~NQ AREAS OUTLINED ON xHE PLOi PLAN 1.~:%
AND DISCUSSED COCE REQUIREMEN75 IN RESPECT TO PARKINQ FACILITIES. I~T WAS
' NOTED SHAT THE PROPOSED DEVELQPMENT WOULD REQUiRE iAORE PARKiNa AREA THAAi
NA8 I.NDI.CATED ON THE PL07 PLAN.
THE pETIT10NER INFORMED THE COMM133ION THAT HE HAD RECEIVED MANY INQUIR-
IES FOR TNE PROPOSED ?YPE OF OPERA710N 9UT 7HAT'IT WAS NECESSARY 70 ~
08TAIN A COND1710NAL USE PERMlT FOR SUCH DEVELOPMENT. HE AL80 INDICATED
TMAT HE MIQHT MISH x0 MODIFY IME PROPOSAL IN ORDER TO U71l.LZE' THE PRO~
PER'[Y FOR A DEFlN1TE 7YPE OF OPERA'(ION ANL` HE DISCU35ED THE INSTALLA~lO,N
. OF AN Ot7TD00R PAT10 FOR D~kIN~.PIlRPOSES AT THE FRONT OF iHE BUILDINB.?`.`
THE COMMISSI6N ADYISED THE PETITIONER THA7 ANY SUBSTANiIAL ALTERATIONS''.`.
OF THE DEVELOPMENT PLANS WOULD REQUIRE SUBMIBSION OF REYISED PLANS FOR
COMMISSION GONSI,DERATION.
COMM188~ONER ALLRED OFFERED A MO'~ION YHAT 7HE BUBJE~T PETiT10N BE CON-
'iINUEA UNTJ L..SUCH TIME AS THE PETIT~ONER COULD^'BUBMA;T'A COWPLETE PARK~ .
X.fiO~LAYOUT AND A DEFlNiTE DEVELOPMENT PR06RAM.
~_) ~ . ~ . ~ ~.,~~
. . . . . . . ~ ~.. r.. i . ~ . . . ~•f.. ~ , . . . . ,.
_ f -,t+~~'~. .
~ ' ~~~___
~`~~~: ' E
E
F: ,: .
A
~ ~ ,
',i; ,,'; .:,
v~/ . ~ S
2p9
MINt1TES~ CITY PLANNING COMMISSION~ JuNe 12~ 1961~ CONT7NUED:
CONDITIONAL USE ~ THB PETXT'l,DNER EXPIALNED.THAT HE WAS REQUESTiNG THE CONSIRUCTION OF. xHE
PERMIT N0. 1.^.9 STORE BUILDIN~ TO•PERMIT THE.WALK-UP RESTAURANT. HOWEVER~.HE NAS AL•'SO
CONTINUED • REQUES7INQ A..MULTI~PURPOSE USE OF 2HE BUILDINa IN CASE HE NAS UNABLE t0
09TAIN A TENANT FOR THE PROPOSEQ OPERAT.~ON~ AND THAT HE WAS REQUE571NQ
THAT THE BUI,LD~NO-BE 12~FEE: DEEPER IN ORDER TO ACCOMODATE ANOIHER USE.
MR. OOVAL(5 57ATED 7HA7 TNE BUILD~NQ NOULD CONFORM WITH THE EXISTJ.Nfi
S7RUCTURES dN 7HE SHOPPING CENTER. ~
COMMISSIONER ALLRED OFFERED TO WITHDRAW TFiE MOTION. THE COMMISSION•
NO2ED THAT ONLY 7HE PLANS•SUBMCTTED N1TH THE•SUBJECT PETITI,ON COULD 6E
CONSIDERED AND THAT TME INSTAI.LATION WOULD•HAVE•TO CUNFORN WITH SA1D
PtANS. THE ?.:T;T:ONER WITHDREM HIS REQUEST FOR CONSIDERA710N OF PLANS
OTHER THAN 7HOSE SUBiniTTED WITH THE••SUBJECT PF.7ITION. •
THE COMMISSION AQAIN REVLEIIED PARKINQ PLANS AND D15CUSSED COCE RGQUIRE-
MENTS.• THE•PET17lONER INDI,CATED•THA7.HE OWNED THE EN7LRE DEVELOPMENT
AND THAT HE COULD PROVIDE ADEQUA7E pARKING ON•ABUSTINQ PROPERTIES. •
' POSSIBCE LANDSCAP•INa•OR PAVI,NQ OF THE•UVDEYELOPED PORTION ON THE REAR
OF THE PROPERTY WAS DISCUSSED AND THE P:T~TIONER INDICATED 7HAT A ORIYE~•
MAY MOULQ BE INBTALLED FClR THE PROPOSED STORES 70 BE LOCATED IN THAT
' hREA. . ..
THE COMMISSION FOUND AND ~ESERMINED iHE FOLLOWItifi FACTS REQARDIN~ 7H6
BUBJEC7 PE'[ITION: ,
1. THAT T.HE PROPOSED rJSE J,5 PROPERLY ONE FOR WHICH A CONDITIONAL U8E
' PERMI,T 15 AUTHORIZED BY THIS CODE~ TO WIT ; A WALK-UP RESTAURANY.
2. THAi TliE PROPOSED USE WOLL NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT THE ADJOININa LAND
4~8E3 AND THE GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT OF 7HE AREA LN WHICH 1T 18
~ PROP08ED ?0 BL~ LOCAIED.
3. THAi SHE 812E AND SHAPE OF TH~ SLSE PROPOBED FOR TNE USE f.8 ADEQUATE•
70 ALLOW TME FULL DEVELOPMENT OF 7HE PROPOSED USE IN A MANN6R NOi
DCTRIMBNTAL 70 7NE PARTICtlI.AR AREA NOR i0 7HE PEAC@~ HEALTH~ ,
' SAFBTY AND OCNERAL WELFARE OF TME C1.712ENS OF 7HE CITY OF ANAH6IM.
4• THAS 7H6 TkAFFIC GEN[RATED BY THE PROPOSED U8E WILL~NOT IMPOSE AN
~ UNDUL BURDLN UPON THE STRE6T9 AND HO.GHWAYS D~SI,GNED AND IMPROVED
. 70 CARRY 7N6 TRAFfIC IN THE AREA.
3. TNAT iNt GRANTINQ ~F 71iE CONDlTIONAL USE PERMIT UND6R THE CONDITIbNS
(MP05CD~ IF ANY~ WILL NOT B! DETRIMEN7AL 70 7HE PEACE~ HEALTN~
BAFLTY~ AND QfNERAL W6LFAR6 OF TME CITIiBNS OP THE CITY OF ANAHLIM.
6. ~HAT TNB SUOJ~CT PROPERTY IlA9 RLCLASSiFLED FROM TNE R~A~ REBJ•DEN7IAL
GRLCULTURAL~ ZONC TO THE G~1~ NEIGHBORNOOD COMMBRCIAL~ 20NE BY
PLTITION FOR RCCLASSIFlCA71C!: N0. 57~38~5. INCLUDED ZN SA~D P[Tl~
7tON l5 7N6 129 FOOT BY 234 FOOT PARC6L ABUT7ING TO TNC SOUTH OF '
SUSJtCT PROP6RTY OF SAID RCCLASSlFICAT.I~N,. CONDlTION N0. 2 OF
OI101NANCL N0. 1213 BY NHICH' SAID PFIOPEI.f't WAS RiCLA9SIFIgD~ BTIPU~
LATLb 7HAT A SIX (d) FOOT CONCRETE BLOCK WALL 8L CONSTRUCTCD ALONG
TAC NORTM AND [AST PROPER~Y LINES WHRRE THE 9UBJ6CT PROPER7Y ABUS9'
RR5IDLNTIAL PROPLRTYj BAID WA~L TO OE MADE A PART OF OUILDING,AND
• NOT A PART OF STREE7 WORK•AND TO BE CON9TRUCTED BEFORL FINAL
INSPECTION OF TMC BUILDING IS MADt.
7. ThAi~ ALiM0U0N TH6 PETITIONFR REQUESTS A COND1710NAL USE PERMIT FOR
A WALK~UP RESTAURAN7~ SHE pL0= PLAN 9UBMITTED Ai.80 PROPOSLS A '
BHOPPJ,NQ.CENTER. TH! PARKIN~ RBQUIRBD FOR THE RE8TAURAiIi~ LXCLUDINa
THE DlNlNG AR£A~ IB 17 PARKIN6 BPACES AND FOR THE D~NINQ AREA AND,
TN6 pROPOSED BkOPPiNQ CCN7ER 35 ADDITIONAL PO"2KING 3PACES,~ MAKINQ A'
' TOYAL Ol '32 PARKING SPACBS. THE PLO7 PLAN SHUWB 37 PARKINQ SPACLB
OR 18-L[88.THAN REQUIRED BY CODB. TH6 PETI.TI.ONER.R6QUESTB iHAZ THE,
ADDITIONAL`RRQUIR6D-PARKING BE PROVIDED AT.THE REAR OF TME PARCEL
ABUTT.INO"~SU6JECT.PROPERxY TO 7HB SOUTH. HOWBVER~ THIC EX18T~NG BUILD~
fNGS ON'TMC VARCEL ABUTTING TO iHE BOU7H REqU1R6~ BY CODE~. THE PRO~
Y~SION fIF :34.; PARICING SPACES~ WHEREAB ONLY 20 SPACES ARE i1;NRIC'ATED
0'N` THE *rL'IIT'P~'i RUIbE.. MOREOV[R~ THE PARKING REQUIRED BY THB WALK-UP
•' R68TAUR~IMT CAN`BE PROV7QED ON SUBJECT PROPERTY.. THE PETlTIONER~
~ , 7FIERCF.ORC~ AGRBB9 7NAT THE 707AL REQUIREMENT OF '3Z SPACES ON SIJBJEC7
,PROPLRTY AND '~.1?.SpACEB ON THE PROPERTX ABUx71NQ 70 7HE SOUtH~ NAKINQ
A YOiAL OF:.~H+ PARK~,NQ SPACESo BHALL flE PROVlQED BY BLAOK-TOPPINQ ANDt
OR STRIP'INO'~'ON`THE SUBJECT :AND ~'HE ABl1771NG PRO?ERTY TO THE SpUTH
iN ACCORDANCE WITFi CODE REQUIREMENTS.
8. TNAT NO ONE APP[ARED ,1N'OPPOSI7J.ON TO SUBJEC7 PE7ITION.
COMMISlIONER ALLRED 9FFERED RESOLUTI.ON ~0. 284~ SER169 1960-61~ AND
MOVLD FOR ITS PASSAGE AND I.DOP7,~ON SECONDBD OY COMMLBSIpNER SUMI~ERB~ T0.
GRANT CONOIxIQNAL USE PERMIT N0. 1~19~ SUBJECT 70 SHE FOLGOMINO CO~ICITIONS:
1. D6VELOPMCN7 SUBSTAN7IALLY IN ACCORDANCE W17H PLANS SUBNITTED N'ITM
9UBJECT PE7ITIGN.
2. PROYIBION OF SEV6N2EEN (-17) PARKINQ 8PAC6S FOR THE WALii"`VP RE9TAUR~
AN7 AND '~MR6E (3) PARKIf~G ~JPACE8 FOR TME DINlNO AREA QF RL87AURANT
ON TMf'SUSJEC= PROPERTY. )7 1S HERE@Y STIPULATED THAi~IN ACCORDANCE
~
~
~ '~(' ~ 1 1 .~.:" ~~~,} .
Q~
.t;F
r `~
!~; -
~ ' ~..
210
Mlt~UTES, CITY Pt.ANN1NG COMMISSION, JuNe i2~ i96i~ CONT7NUED:
CONDITIONAL USE ~ WITH CODE PARKINa REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROPOSED SHOPPING CENTER•ON
PERMIT N0. 129 SUBJE:T PROPERTY~ PARKINCa MAY BE PROVIDED~ 1N•PAR7~ ON THE PROPERtY
CONTINUED • ABUTTING i0 THE SOUTH W'tTH iHE CONDITION xHAT THE COMBINEO PARKINa
. ON THE TWO PROPERTIES SHALL MEET THE CODE PARKING REQUIREMENTS.
3. PROVISION OF A SIX (6) FOOT MASONRY MAIL ON THE NORTH AND EAST
BOUNDARIES OF SUBJECT PROPER2Y A5 REQUiRED 9Y CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE
No. 1215. ~
4. QEDICAIION OF 53 FEEi FRCM 7HE MONUMENTED CENiERL(NE OF MA(iNOLIA
' AVENUE (50 FEET EXISTON(i).
5. PAYMENT OF ~2.00 PER FRONT FOOT FOR STREET LI.~HTINQ PURPOSES. .
T FORE~OINQ CONDIT~ONS WERE RECITED Ai THE MEE71N0 AND HERE~~FOtlND 70
F A NECESSARY PREREQUISITE TO 7HE USE OF THE PROPERTY AN ORDER x0 PRE-~
beRVE•7HE SAFETY AND WELFARE OF•7HE CLSIZENS OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM.
ON ROLL CALL THE FOREOOINQ RESOLU710N WAS PASSED BY THE FULLOWLNG VOTE:
AYES: COMMISSlONERSt ALLRED~ MARCOUX~ MORROS~ MUN6A~l~ PERRY~ SUMMERS.
NpES: COMM1SS10NERSS NONE.
QBSENT: COMM1SSlONERS: CHAIRMAN GAUER~ HAP~OOD.
CONDITIONAL USE - PUBLIC MEARING. PET.JTION SUBMIT7ED ev MAGNOLIQ BAPTIST CHURCH OF ANA-
PERMIT N0. 130 H~IN~ 720'SOUTN MACiNOLIA AVENUE~ ANAHEIbI CALLFORNIA~ OWNER~ REQUESTlN~
PERkIS51CN T'0 EXPAND•EXISTING CHURCH FACILITIES ON PROPERTY DESCRIBED A5:
A PARCEL 270 FEET BY 319 FEET W1TH A•FRONTAQE OF 313 FEE7 ON•MAGNOLIA
AVENUE AND LOCA7ED OM•THE EAST SIDE OF MA~NOLIA AVENUE•BE7WEEN ORAN~E
AVENIlE AND ROME AVENUE~ (TS NORTHWE57 CORNER BElNO'APPROXIMATELY 1~005
' FEET SOUTH OF TNE •°,SUTHEAST CORNER OF ORANdE AND MA~NOLIA aVENUES~
PROPERTY PRESENTLY CLA83AFIED R~A~ RESIOENTIAI AGRICULTUR{lL, ZO~NE.,
MR. EDWIN BONNET~ 20U1 HASTER STREET~ ANAHEIM~ APPEM ED BEFORE THE COM~
MiSSION~ (NDICATED HE WAS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE KAONOLIA BAPTIST CHURCH~
AND DESCRIBED TME PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF A CHURCH SANCTUARY~ CNAPEL AND
CLA88ROOM3.. NE DISCUSSEO THE BLOCK WAI.L REQUIREMENT8 RECOMFiENDED FOR THE
BOUTN ANO EABT PROPERTY LIN-S~ AND REQUESTEC TMAT THE EXISTINO CHAIN IINK
AND W000 FENCINa~ WNICH COMPLIED WI'CH THE ORIa1NAL REQUIRENENTS BEFORE
ANNEXATION 70 THE CiTY~ BE PERMITTED TO REMAIN. THE AQENT STATED THAT
TNE CHURCH W18HE0 'FO ACQUIRE MORE LAND IN THE FUTURE AND THAT A BLOCK
MALL MOULD BE DIFF4CULT TO REMOVE. HE STATED FURTHER THA7 THE PROPOSED
CONSTRUCTION WOULD BE A DEFINITE ASSET TO THE COMMUNITY AND WOULD BE A
~ CREDIT TO TME NEIO~BORHOOD.
THE NEARING WAS CLOSEU.
THE COMM18510N D15CUS5~~ THE PROPERTY TO TF{E REAR GF THE SUBJECT PRO-
PERTY~ WMICH PRESENTLY CONTAINS A RESIDENCE. THE Ai~ENT INDO.CATED THAT
A FIFTEEN F001' EASEMENT EXISTED FOR A PRIVATE STREET~ THAT THE CHURCH
HOPED TO ACQUIRE THE PROPERTY BY QUITCLAIM DEED~'AND THAT AN EIOHTEEN
F00T DRIVEWAY WOULD BE PROVIDED ON THE SOUTH OF'THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
THE CONMIBSION DISCUSSED VARIOU5 PROBLEMS TO CONSIDER iN REQARD TO TFiE
PRlVATE STREET AND NOTED THAT (T MIOHt BE EXTENDED AND BECOM~ A SUB~•
STANDARD STREET. IT WAS RECOMMENDED THAT A STUDY BE MADE OF THE MATTER
BY THE ENa1NEER:N~ DEPARTMENT.
COMMISSIONER FERRY OFFERED A MOTION~ SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER MUN6ALL
ANA CARRIED~ THAT QETITION fOR CONDtT10NAL USE Q3RMlT H0. 130 8E CON~
TINUED UNTIL THE MEETIN(i OF JUNE 26~ 1961 AND THA7 7HE SUBJEC2 PETITION
BE REFERRED TO THE EN~INEERIN~ DEPARTMENT FOR A STUDY AND RECOMMENDATION
IN RESPECT TO THE PRIVATE STREET.
CONDITIOyAI USE - RUBLIC HEARING. PETITION SUBMITTED ev MAY BEATTY NEIGHBORS, ET AL~ 6540
PERMIT NU. 131 PINEMAY~ ANAHEIM~ CAL~FORNIA~ OWNER~ DUANE AND BARBARA HESS, 910 GARDEN
STREET ANAHEIM CALIFORNIA~ LESSEES~ REQUESTlNQ PERMISSION TO ESl'ABLISH
A HOFF~RAU R~STAURANT UN PROPERTY DESCRIBED A52 A PARCEL 50 FEET BY'153
FEET'W17H A Fii0NTA0E OF.50 FEET ON LA PALMA AVENUE AND LOCATED ON THE
NORTH SIDE OF LA PALMA AVENUE BETWEEN EUCLID AVENUE AND QNONDAfiA STREETj
17S 80UTHEdBT CORNER BEINCi APPROXIMATELY 217 FEF! WEST OF THE NORTHWEST
• CORNER OF LA PALMA AND EUCL:~ AYENUES AND FURTH~R DESCRIBED AS 1719 MEST
LA PALMA AVENUE. PROPER7Y PREBENTLY CLASSIFIEDbR-A,.RESIDENTIAL AGRICUL~ '
TURAL~ ZONE.
MR•. ROBERT MURRI6L~ ADEN'~ FOR THE PETITIONER~ APPEARED BEFORE THE COMMIS~
SION AND 57ATED HE YAD NOTHiNQ TO ADD TO THE iHFORMA710N CONTAINED IN THE
PExIT10N.
MR. RAYMOND SPEHAR~ OWNER OF ?ROP@RTY A.T 1769 WEST LA PALMA HVENUE~
APPEARED BEFORE THE.COMM15510N AND STATED THAT HE WAS NOT APPEARINO IN
OPPOSlT10N TO THE SUBJECT PET'ITION. HOWEVER~ HE DID NOT, CONg~DER 7HE
PRESENT PARKINO FACILI'?IES AOEQUATE FOR THE EXISTIN~ POOL SUPP~Y STORE
~ LOCATED ADJACENT TO THE SUHJECT PROPERTY AND ONMED BY THE PEi1710NER~
AND 7HAT THE PROPOSED BAR :)IO NOT PR(1VI~E SUFFICIENT PARKINfi AREA FOR
_~.... . ...~, _-_
_..-.-~.~~ . ~ .~
~ ~ _
~:;? ..- I MINUTES.'CITY PLANNING COMMISSIGi1~ .IUNE 12~ 1961~ CoNriNUen:
~ .-
~ CONDITIONAL USE - ITS ESTAB~ISHMENT. ;
PERMIT N0. 131
t COHTINUED MR. DUANE HESSy 910 GARDEN STREET~ ANAHEIM~ APPEARED BEFORE THE.COM~
i` MISSION~•INDICATE~ THAT HE WOULD BE THE OPERATOR ~F THE BAR~ THAT THE
. OMNER OF THE PROPERTY MOULD PERMIT P.ARKJ,NQ BEHI.ND THE.P00~ SUPPLY
" STORE~ AND THAT 7HE AREA MOU.D BE BLACKTOPPED.
~~, THE HFJIRING•MAS CLOSED. •
j TNE COMMISSJON DISCUSSED THE PRESENT CONDITION OF THE ABUTTlNO PRO-
E' • pER?Y AND NOTED TNAT IN ORDER.70 PROVIDE A PROPER P~SVELOPMENT OF TNE
~.`-. PRUPERTY~ THE PRESENT BUlLDINf3S SHOULD BE REMOVED AND A SUlTABLE DEVEL~
C OPMENT~T.HAT WOUI.D NOT BE A DETRIMEN7 TO THE AREA~BE INSTALLE~. •
THE COMMISSION FOUND AND DETERMINED THE FOLLOMINO FP.:'f5 RE(iARDINa THE
6 ~ SUBJECT PETITION: ~
1: THAT THE PROPOSED USE IS PROPERLY ONE FOR WHICH A CONDITIONAL USE
pERM1T IS AUTHORIZED BY THIS CODE~ TO WIT:• A HOFFBRAU RESTAURANT.
~ 2. THA1` THE PROPOSED USE WLLL ADVERSEI.Y AFFECT THE ADJOININ~ LAND
~„ ' USES AND THE aROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE AREA IN WHICH 17 IS
PROPOSED TO 8& LOCATED.
~' ,. TNAT THE SIZE AND SHAPE OFOTHE SITE PROPOSED FOR THE USE IS PIOT
ADEQUATE TO ALLOW•THE,FULL•DEVELOPMEN7 OF THE PROPOSED USE IN A .
2 MANNER•NOT DETRIMENTAI TO THE PARTICULAR AREA NOR TO THE PEACE~
~ HF.Al7H~ aAFETY~ AND QENERAL WELFARE OF THE.CITI2ENS.OF THE CITY
OF ANAHEIM. ~
` 4. THAT THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH CODE REQUIRE~ .
E: MENTS FOR PROVIDIN~ AN ADEQUATE.AMOUNi OF PARKING AREA.
i,
E:` COMNISSIONER ALLRED OFFERED RESOLUTION N0. 285~ SERIES 1960~61~ AND
MOVED•FOR ITS•PASSAQE•ANO ADOPTION~ SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER MARCOUX~
~ ' TO DENY PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMlT N0. 131 ON THE BA515 OF
THE AFOREMENTIONED FINDIN~S. ~ •
ON ROLL CALL THE FORE~OIN~ RESOLUTION WAS PASSEO BY THE FOLLOW~N(i VOTE:
~
. AY~ES: CpMMISSIONERS: ALLRED~ MARCOUX~ MORRIS~ MUNOALL~ PERRY~ SUMMERS.
F ~ NOES: COMMISSIONERS7 NONE.
, ABSENTS COMMISSIG~tERS: CHAIRMAN GAUER~ HAPGOOD.
CONDITIONAI USE - PUBLIC HEARING. PETITION SUBMITTED ev ENMETT AND CLARA M. HINKLEY, 1437
PERM17 N0. 132 SOU7H ROSE STREETt SANTA ANA~ CALIFORNIA~ OWNERSj R. A~ DIEDRICN nNo
. C. FRODSHAM~ 908 tAST OLEANDER~ BR~A~ CALIFORNIA AQENTS~ REQUESTI.Nd
PERMIBSION TO CONSTRUCT SINGLE STORY GARDEN APARfMENTS oN PROPERTY oes-
CR18ED AS, A PARCEI. 330 FEET BY 635 FEET WI,TH A FRONTAQE OF 33Q FEET ;
ON LA PALMA AVENUE AND ~OCAiED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF LA FALMA AVENUE '
BETWEEN ACACIA STREET AND PLACENTIA AVENUE~ ITS SOU7HME5T ..^,ORN6R BEINfi i
ARPROXIMATELY 300 FEET EAST OF THE NOR?HEAST CORNER'OF ACACIA SIREET
~ ` AND LA PALMA AVENUE. PROPERTY PRESEN7LY CLASSIFIED R~fA~ RESIDENTIAL
AGRICUL7URAl, ZONE.
MR. LESTER LEV~ REPREBENrATIVE FOR THE PE7lTi0NER5~ APPEARED BEFORE THE .
COMMlS510N AND DESCRIBED THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMEHT OF SINOLE STORY ~ARDEN
~ APARTMBNTB.' HE STATED THAT TNE.PROPOSED DEVELOPMEN7 MOULD 8E THE FIRST
f.. OF ITS KIND IN ANAHEIM~ THAT IT NOULD BE SIMICAR TO TNE ONE IN SANTA
F ANA~ THAT IT YIOULD HE A LON DENSlxY L17XUAY H00S{N4 DEVELQPMENT ANO
C IDEALIY 617UATED~ THAT IT MILL BE APPROXIMATELY TWO MlLES FkOM THE AUTO~
~.., NETICS INDU4TRlAL DEVELOpMENT AND W1LL CATER TO THE HI~HER BRACKE7 PER~'
SORNEL EMPI.OYED THERE~ AND 7HAT. 7lIERE NAS A NEEO FOR A HI(iH•QUALPTY
OEVELOPMENT IM THE C1TY OF ANAHEIM. HR. LEV DESCRIBED THE ZONIN~ AND
LAND USE -0F THE SURROUNDINa AREA AND STAiED THAT THEY EXPECTED TG RENT
TO FAMIL•I,ES WITHOUT CH~LDREN. ~~E'STATED 7HAT THE SIZE OF THE UNITS WO:f.D
BE IN EXCESB OF CODE REQUIRENF..: ~~ THAT THEY WOULD CONTAIN LUXURY APPOINT^
MENTS SUCH AS FIREPLACES~ SLIDIN~•OLASS DOORS~ AND PRIVAT.E PATLOS~ ?HAT
SEAUTlFUL AHD DETAliEQ ;AkDSGAPlN(i Yt~V6p'@E PROVIDED FOR THE ENTIRE
~ ' PROJECT UTIU 2LNQ SHADE TREES PREBENTLY ON THE PROPERTy~ THAT A 5•lX ,
F00T BLOCK WALL WOULO BE CONSTRUCTED SURROUNDIN~ T,y~ SUBJECT PROPERTY uN
THREE SFDEB TO HE IWBTALLED ON THE NORTH~ L~AST~ ANp(MEST PROPERTY LOPIESj
~ ' 2HAT T.HE°NUMBER OF QARAQES MOULD BE PROVID6D TO MEEi CODE REQUIREMENTS~
THAT A RECREATION AREA WOUL~ BE PROVIDED'AT THE'REAR OF 7HE PROPERTY
CONTAINING A SWIMMINO POOL ANO CABANA~ THA7 THE'PRiVATE'PATIOS W161 B~
A ~ SEPARATED 9Y ~RAPE STAKE FENCINQ~ AND THAT THE CONSTRUCTIDN WILL BE -0F
E ~' THE BEBT QUALI.TY AND,MILL REPRESENY A TOTAL INVESTNEN~, OF APPROXIMATELY
~`y' s :1~000~000 IN LAND ANO IMPROVENEN7S. HE STA7ED FtiRTHER ?HAT THE APART~
a~,,;, MENTS`WOULD'BE SET BACK 75 FEET FROM THE PROPERTY LINE TO PROYIDE QIlESi
PARKINO~ AND THAT SiORAGE LOCKERS WOULD BE PROYIDED I,N THE GARAGES.
i r.r.~p~ ` ~ . . . . . . ~ .. : ~ .. . ~ ~ ~. - ~ . .. ~ ~'. , , , .
'~"'~,c; MR. R. A. ~IEDRICN~ 908 EAST'OLEANDER~ BREA~ ApPEARED~BEFORE THE COMM1,4-
' °'~J~~'~.;,~ SION AND STATED THA7 l'HE SLTE HAS CHOS°W'BECAUSE OF Ii4 CLOSE ~ROXIMITY
~' ~ TO:THE INDUBTRIAC BECT.lONS OF FULLERT6N AND ANAHEIM AN.~ T0 xHE RIYERSIDE
FRE6MAY~ ANO THA7 lT WOULO CATER ')'O.TNE:MI~iN INCOME GROUP.'
- ,,
:,,
~, '
M ~ ~
n,~~ .. ..W:r ~-~~~~ ..~;~~~~.~~.~5 ~_,^::.. , . . . ";`!e ~...... -.~;"i } ,:~'Y~'.. .I..~_ . .}~;.... ,..i. y~. ^..~ N1'.tj ~~v ~r~k _[~:, `...i:: . , ... . . . .. .. ,
~.
~
. a , ,,
~ ~ ~
~ / ~
2iz
~~ -
f
MINUTES, CiTY PLANNING CORFlISS10N, JuNE 12, 1961~ CONTINUED:
CONDITIONAL USE ~ MR. BILL JONE5~ REAL ESTATE BROKER FROM ORAN~E~•APPEARED BEFORE THE•
PERMIT N0. 132 CQMq15510N AND READ AN EXCERPT FROM THE NALL STREET ~OURNA4 WHICH
CONTINUED •1NDICATED THAT H16H SALARIES WOULD BE PAID FOR PROFESSIONAL AND TECH~
NICAL EMPLOYEES OF AUTONETICS. HE STATED THAT THE ANAHEIM AREA NEEDED
A HI(iH TYPE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT SUCH AS 7HE PETITIONER~S INTEND TO
DEVELOP~ AND.THAT CHILDREN WOULD NOT BE.A PROBLEM BECAUSE OF THE TYPE
ANO PROBABLE AGE.OF iHE RENTERS. • •
MR. ED COLLING} 2204 SOUTH REDWOOD STREET~ ANAHEIN~ PRfSIDENT OF THE ,
ANANEIM CIVIC ASSOCIATION~ APPEARED BEFORE THE COMMISSION AND STATED
THXT•HE WAS NOT SPEAK,ING AS A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ASSOCIATION~ BUT
THAT,HE WAS IN FAVOR OF THE TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT AS PROPOSED BY THE
PETITIONERS AND THA7 A QUALITY DEVELOPMENT OF THIS TYPE WOULD BE AN
ASSEi TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM. ,
THE HEARING•WAS CLOSED,
THE COMMISSION FOUND AND DE7ERMINED THE FOLLOWINQ FACTS REGARDINO 7HE
. SUBJECT PETITION:
1. THAT THE PROPOSED USE IS PROPERLY ONE FOR WHICH A CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT"IS'AUTHORI2ED 9V TH15 CODE~ TO WIT: SlNO~E STORY 6ARDEN
APARTMENTS. •
2. THAT THE PROPOSED USE NILL NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT THE ADJOININO LAND
USES AND THE OROWTH AND DEVELOPMENi OF THE AREA LN WHICH 1T'IS
PROPOSED TO BE LOCATED. . . •
3. THAT THE S12E AND SHAPE OF THE SITE PROPOSED FOR 7HE USE IS ADE-
QUATE TO ALLOW 7HE FULL DE4ELOPMENT OF THE PROPOSED USE 4N A
NANNER NGT DETRlMENTAL TO THE PARTICULAR AREA NOR 70 7NE PEACE~
HEALTH~ SAFETY~ AND 3ENERAL WELFARE OF THE CITIZEPIS OF THE CITY
OF ANAHEIM. .
4. THAT THE TRAFFIC OENFRATED BY THE PROPOSED USE WILL NOT IMPOSE
AND UNDUE BURDEN UPON THE STREETS AND HI,OHWAYS DESIaNED AND
PROPOSED TO CARRY 7HE TRAFFIC IN THE AREA.
5. TMAT THE ORANTINO OF THE CONDITIQNAL USE PERMIT UNDER THE COND1~
, TIONS IMPOSED~ IF ANY~ a1LL NOi BE DE7RIMENTAL TO THE PEACF~
HEALTN~ SAFETY~ AND f3ENERAL WELFARE OF•THE C1jl2EN5 OF THE CITY •
OF ANAHEIM.
6. THAT THE TWEN'[Y (20) FOOT SPACIN~ BETWEEN BUILDINO FRONTS AS
PROPOSED IS CONSIOERED AOEQUATE FOR SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT~ AND IS
CONSIDERED TO BE A SPECIFIC EXCEPTION TO THE CODE REQUlREIF3.NT FOR
THE R-A~ RESIDENTIAL AaRtCULTURAL ZONE FOR MHICH PROVISION IS
MADE IN SECTION 18~64.070 OF THE ~NAHEIM MUNICLPAL CODE. •
7. THAT NO ONE APPEARED IN OPPOSITION TO SUBJECT PETITION. VERBAL
SUPPORT IN FAVOR OF SUBJECT PETITIOH MAS RECORDEO.
COMMLSSIONER MARCOUX OFFERED RESOLUTION N0. 286~ SERIES 1960~61~ AND
MOVED FOR LTS PA35ADE AND AOOP710N~ SECONDE^ BY COMMISSIONER MUN~ALL~
TO ~RANT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMI N0. 132~ SUBJEC7 TO THE
FOLLOMINQ CONDITIONS:
1. DEVELOPMENT SU857ANTtALLY IN ACCORDANCE M1TH PLA!!S PRESENTED.
2. PROVISION OF L,".NDSCAPINQ LN ACCORDANCE WITH PLANS PRESENTED. PLANS
FOR SA~D LANDSCAPIN~ TO BE SUBM1?2ED TO AND APPROVED BY 7HE SUPER-
INTENDENT OF PARKNAY MAINTENANCE. ,
3. DEDICATION oF 53 FEET FROM THE MONUMENTED CENTERLINE OF LA PALMA
AVENUE (30 FEET EXISTINQ).
4. PREPARATION OF STREET 1MPROVED;ENT PLANS AND INSTALI.:TI.ON ~iF ALL
IMPROVEMEkTS 1N ACCORDANCE W'fTH APPROVED STANDARD'PLRNS UN FILE
1N 1'NE OFFICE OF THE ClTY ENQINEER.
5. PAYMENT OF =2.00 PER FRONT FOOT FOR STREET LIaH7lNQ PURPOSEB.
b. PROVIBION OF UTILITY EABEMEN?8 A~ONCI EX7ERIOR BOUNDARILS AS DETER-
MINED BY 7HE D1REC70R OF PUBI.LC UTILI.TIESr
7: PAYMENT OF :25.00 PER DMELL.INQ UN1T PARK AND RECREATION FEE TO BE
COLLECTED AS PART OF BUILDINQ PERidIT.
THE FORE00'Na CONDITIONS MERE'REGLTED AT TIIE MEETI,NO AND WERE FOUND 70
BE A NECEa"iARY PR~REQUISITE TO THE USE OF THE PROPERTY IN ORDER TO
PRESERVE fNE SAFEYY AND ME~FARE OF 7ME ~1712El74 OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM.
ON ROL1. CALL Tl4E FORE401N~ RESOLUT)ON WAS PASSED BY THE FOLIOMIN3 VOTE;
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ALLRED~ MARCOUX~ f~ORRIS~ MUNOALL~ PERRY~ SUqMERS.
NQE':: COMMISSIONERS: NONE. •
A!sSENT: COMNISSION6RS: CHAIRMAN 6AUER~ HAP800D.
..~..1~_.~.
~~,-~ - ,~.-- --- . - G.~ '..~. . ;?:~ _ ~_„ .
,
!
~ .
___._.~
, •,
---- ":
213
': E
E: ! ' - .
. `~
PftICUTES~ CI7Y PLAfiNiN6 COPIFII5SION~ JuNe 12, 1961, CoxrtNU~o; .
CONDITIONA~L USE - PUBLIC HE/tR1NG. • PET~~.rion~ suaM~r•seo ev CHURCH OF..~ESUS CHRIST 244e
PERMIT NO_ ?33 QRANflE AVENttE~ ANAHEIl1~ CALI~ORN~,A~ QwNEttp REV~REND JAlfES HEA~S; 2448
~ ' VRANAE AVENUE ANAHEINy CALlFCRNiA~ qGEN7~ REQUE8i1NQ:P.ERMISSLON TO•
FIAINTA•~N A, CH~RCH. ON PROAERTY -0ESCRI9ED ,ASS • A.PARCE4 133..F.~SE? BY 228
FEE7 MITH A FRON7A~E OF 133•FEET'pN OkANfi~ d1YEMUE AND LpCATLD ON TN~
SOUYHEASx CORNER.OF.ORAN6E AVEHUE ANO.MEBST6R STREEi~ AN6 fUR7HER
D~8CR10ED AS 2448 ORANOE AYHNUE;• . ,,,
~ REVEREND JANES HEAPS AppBAREQ BE~pRE',TME CONNISSION ANC RBYIEMEO THE
BACKBRGUND ON iMB EBIABLISHMERx OF A••CHURCIt tlM••7HE •SUBJlCT PROPtR~Y.
• Ht ;ND1CA7~0 TNAx xHE CixY COlINC•Il. HAD ADVISED H1M. TO• A~PLY• FQR• A
MAI~IER•-0F TNE GNE ACRE REQUIREMENT CN_EAF.ECT.ON iNE SU9JEC7 AROPERTY.
R~Y6REND•HEAPB STAxED 7HAx IT~MAi•NECE85ARY TO OB~A4N THLS MAIYER.
S[CAUSE IT WAS ~NPOSSIBLE FOR H1M iQ•OBT~IN 7AX ABL~E~ FROM.xNE 1.AR8E
LNUSED PORT~ON OF; iHE PROPERFY,~ THA7.•lT..1dA6 AN UNNECES6ARY• sURD[N~
TNAT THE CONQRE3ATIQN WOULD NOT~Bo '1NCREASINQ (N iNE FU7URE~ AND 'GHAT
• M~ HRD• A.BtIXER F.OR 7H6. AROPER7y •tF T.HE g{~9,JEC7 PEx1T.JON. NERE ARANiED.
N~ STAxEO•FURiHER iMAI THE EX1971N8 CHURCH MAS AqpL6 pARKlN3 fAC1,L~TlEB
AND xMAT~ BNGULG THE CHURCH INQttEA36 !2S COIlQRB9A7xpN.~N iHE FUxUR[~'•
1t dOU~D BE RELOCAxED.' '
TH6 COMMISSlONEAND STATEDEHE•MASNN07AOPP08~NQNTNL18UBJECZRPE7tTlONE
HOMEVER~ NE D~D EXRRESS CGNC[RJ( ABOUT THE USE OF THE rRGPER?Y /N iME'
LV[NT li WAS SOLD AND CONCERN ABOUT 7NE POS83BJ,tITY OF THE 9RONTH OF
TNE tX19i1NG CHURCH. . .
REVEREND HEAPS STATED•TMAT 7HE LOTS•WERE 20NED FOR RESIDENTIAL USE AND '
, TNAT•THE BUY6R INTENDBD TO•CONS7RUCT A MOME ~q 7H6 PROPER7Y. •Hf '
ASSUR6D'iME COMMISSION•THAi THE CNURCH NOUID N07' NEED ADDlS10NAL ~
fAC~L1SIES ~p '~NE FU7URE AND THAi~ /.N THE EVCN7'THL' CON9RE6AIlON 9REM~ '
1T WOULD BE MOY6D 70 ANOIHER LOCAT'ION.
THE HEARING MIIS ClOSED. ~ . '
~ A 018CUSS10N 6NSU6D RELATlVE 70 TN[ PROCEDUpAL ME7ROD 70 ![ UxILl2ED
FOR PROC6851NG 7ME R6QULST[D MA1,YfiR OF IHE OHC ACRE LOT RLQUlREMEN2.
THe COMMI3~S,ON FOUND AND pEiERM1NED-TF1E FOI.LOWINY FAC?8 R[9ARDIN9 iNt
SUldtCT P[;i710N;
. . l': THA7 TM[~pRpPDSCD 1lSE l8 PROP6RLY ONB FOR MM1,CH A CONDlT•IONAL Us[
. PERMIT 18 AUiHOR12ED BY 7M13 CODQ~ TO M17t A CMtlRCM. .
. 2~ TNA7 TNE pROPOlLD USE W1LL NOT ADYERlEI.Y AFFfCi THE ADJOlNINB ~AND
• U565,AMD !HE 6ROMzH ANO DEVELQPMEN7 OF iHE AREA tN MNICH !T .Iy
LOCA'CED.
3. TMAT 7NE S12E AND SHAPE CF 7HE S~7E PROP08ED FOR.7Nl,Y8C !3 AD6QBATE
, TO ALLpM TNE FULL DEVELOPMENt OF ~FiL PRO~OSCD U5E IN A NANNER MOi
SArLTYEANDLpEN[RAL W6~FARELOF THEACIYI2[NS~OF 7HECCITY~OF~ANAMCIM.
4~ TMAx TME TRAFFIC flENERAZtD 9Y xN6 PROPCSED USE iI~~L Np? :llppSE AN
UNDUE lURDEN UPOH THE SSREExB ANO H1fiMMAY~ DESL~NED AND ~R6~08~~
. TO CARRY TN[ TRAFFIC IN 7ME AREA.
S. THAT TH[ flRAN21NG pF TNE COND17xONAL USE PtRM1T UNpER THE COND1~
. TION3 4MPOSCD~ IF AKY~ WILL NqI sE pQ7RlMtNxAL xp iH[ PEACL MEAL~N~
5AF[TY~ AND flENCRAL W6tFARE OF 7NE CIT12EN5 OF THE CITY OF ~NAIit~M.
6. 7HAi TH6 BUEJECT rLi1T10N WAf FILED A'~ ;Ht CIRECxIMIC OF TME CITY
C.IJUNCIL~ AND'7NAi THE CITY AiTORNEY~S OFFICL MAO RULEO YMAT 1N
. A5 NUCM A6 TM6 lUOJECT PAACE4 IS A LOi tN A RECORDEq BUODPy1810N~
A SPECIFIC BXCEPTION TO SECTION 18.18.030 (4~B)~ UNDER THE AULNQR~
LTY Of S6CilON 18.84.070~ WOULD BC PRO~CR~ AND TME ES7ASLISHM[pT'.
OF ?M[ CHURCM A7 1TS PRESENt SITE SHOU~p ^E ACC9N~L~8Ktb !Y A
CONGI7I,ONAL ~5~ PERMIT.
~ 7• TMAT NO ONE APPEARtD IN OPP051TlON T0 SUBJ6C= ~eF~T10N. ~ '
COMMLSS~ONER ALLRED CFFBRED RE90WTION N0.,287~ SERIL5.1960~o1~'AMD ~
NOVED FCR (TS PASSA96 ANC ADOP7LON SECONDED !Y COM.Mf'JSLGMER ~ARC9tlX~ ' ~
T.O,GRANT PLTI710N FOR CCqDIT10NAL ~SC PERMIT N0. 133~ suedtc~ io rH[~ ,
F6LLOWINa CONp[7IGN0 ~
' 1. jHA~ THt p~D~,CATADN AND•STRLLT INPROVLMLM;S p~' yE85x[R,SxRfET !L'MAl,1/Ep~
~ !~i ONLY UNT~L BUGH x1ME AS TME RaNA4NGER OF ME~d7ER STRLL7 lS
XMPROY~D. „
•, ~ TML FOREQO:yQ CONDXTlON WAS RECI]'ED At" xNC Nt¢x~,Nfl AND qAS / TO A
q[CL06ARY ~RBRCQYI3li6 TO THE USE OF 7HL PROP[~!xY 1N ORDLR 7~~sLll~~
TMR bAFL2Y AND WELl~AR[ OF Tl1E C1712EN8 OF iME CITY Of ANAKL{M~.''
; 6N ROLL CA{.L TNE FORLaO(N9 RC80LU710N YlAS pA85LQ YY '~HL FOLLOM,(Nq y07L;
p~~~ ~9~Ip~~~1~RERSi NONLED~ AA(lCOUX~ M~RRAS~ MUNBALL~ PERRY~ SUNMiR3.
A S'r.llT: CpNR S I.NERS. CHAIRMAN QAUCR~ HA-QOOqr
,. ' _ .. : , ~'~
~l _ _ ; ~
~
~
~
~- . _ ~ ~-----------
V
'
f ~
~; .
ys...
y „
~
,,..~
~14
MlNUTES~ ClTY PLA;iN]HG COFiF11SSlOK, Juxe i2~ 1961~ CON7INUED:
RECLASSiFICATION - PUBLIC HEARIN6. PE'~ITION SUBNITT.ED ev ELMER L. AND LESLEY G. NOODS~•
NO. 60-61-101 223 COL.IN~ COMPTON~ CALI.FORJIIA~ OWNERS~,REQUESi1N0 '~HAT PROPERTY DES-
CRIBED AS: A PARCEL GO FEET BY 13,0 FEET YtITH•A FRONTADE OF 60 FEET ON
LA PALMA AVENUE ANO LOCATED BE'~WEEN PLAC~NiIA•AVENLLE.AND•WHIT24ER •
STREE7 ON THE SOU7H..StDE Of•LA PALMA AVENUE~.178 NORTHME57 CORNER
BEINa APPROXLMAYELY 880 FEET EAST OF.'.THE S~UTHEAST C~RNER OF PLACEN7IA
RVENUE AND I.A PALMA AVENUE AND FURTH~R DESCRlBED AS 2200 EAST LA PALNA
AYENUE~ 6E RECLASSI,Fl.ED FROpI TNE R"A RESIDENTIAL AIiRICIlLTURAL, ZONE
so THE R-3~ MULTIPLE•FAMILY RESIDEN7IAL, ZONE.
MRS. LESLEY WOODS~'223 COLIN AVENUE~ COMPTON~ APPEARED BEFORE THE COM~
MtS510N~ DESCRIBED iHE PROPOSED CONSTRUCiION•OF. A 7RIPLEX~ AND STATED
THA7 THE STRUCTU~tES MOULD BE'SET BACK•.35,FEET FROM 7HE•PROPER7Y LLNE
AND NOULD GOMPLY,WI7H GODE REQUIREMENIS FOR THE R-3~ MULTIPLE FAM1lY
RFSIDEN7IAL~ 20NE. ~SHE STAiEp•FURTHER.TNA7 THERE WAS AN EXISTFN~
7RIPLEX EAST OF 7HE SUBJECT PROPERTY~ THAT.THE CQNS'~RUCTION WOULD BE
SUITABLE FOR THE AR~A~ ANG 7HAi 7HE UNITS KOULD BE OF H1QH QUALITY
CONSTRUCTION.
MR. RAYMOND J. MOORE~ 2224 EAST LA PALMA AVENUE~ APPEARED BEFORE THE
COMMISSION AND S7ATED THAT HE WAS IN OPP051.710N TO THE SUBJE:T PETITION
AECAUSE•THE LOT DIMENSI~NS WERE 60•FEET BY 130 FE:T WHICH HE COHSIDERED
1NSUFFICIENT FOR EVEN A SINaLE FAMILy RESIDENCE. HE STATED THAi.ADE~
QUATE PARKlNa COULD N07 BE PROVI,DED AND 7HAZ THE PROPOSER DEVELOPMENZ
WOULD-E57ABLl5H AN UNDESIRADLE PRECEDEN7 FOR•SIMILAR DEYELOPNEN7 •lN THE
AREA. HE ~TATED FURTHER.THAT THE EXISTIN~ MUITIPLE FAMILV RE54D~?NTJ.AL
DEVELOPMENT IN THE AREA NAS SIiUATED ON A LARQE pARCEL~ 7HAx IT '~AS A
HIOH QUALIiY DEVELOPMENT~ AND THAT IT SERVED AS A 9UFFER BETWEEN''IHE
RESIDENTIAL AND•COMMERCIAL DEVELOPNEN7 LN THE AREA.
MR. EDWIN COLLIN~~ PRESIDENi OF THE ANAHEIN CIV1C ASSOC).ATION~ APPEARED
BEFORE THE COMMISSION~ AND SUBMLT.ZED A LET7ER OF PROTEST FRON THE
ASSOCIAx10N WHICH INDICATED 7HAT 7HE PROPOSED'DEVELpPMENT WAS KOUT OF
CHARACTER WLTH THE RESIDENTIAL NATURE OP SHE AREA.• ,MR. COLLINQ STATED
THA7 THE 6XISTINa MULTiPLE FAMdLY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IN 7NE AREA
WAB ESTABL,I.SNED BY A VARIANCE~ T,HAI IT MAINT.AtNED A SINflLE FAMIIY
REBIDENTIAL APPEARANCB AND T.HAx !,7 WAS COMPATIBLE Wl'fH 7HE PREDONIN-
ANTLY R~1~ ONE FAMILY ~ESIDENiIAt~ DEVELOPMENx I,N THE AilEA. FIE SYA7ED
FUR7.HER THAT A L1NE MUSx BE ESTABLISHED BLYNEEN xHE SINGLE FAMILY
R6SIDENTIAL-DEVELOPMENT AND 07HER TYPES OF DEVELOPMENT AND THAT HE
CONBIDERED LA PALMA AVENUE 70 BE 1NAT L1NE.
MRS. HARRY LARSON~ 2214 EABT LA PALMA AVENUE~ APPEARED. BEFORE THE COM~
tA1,8810N~ STATED THAT THE Gi:BJECT PROPERTY WAS TOO SMALL FOR 7HE PRO~
POSBD DEVBLOPMENT~ EXPRESSED CONCERN ABOUT INFERIOR 7YPE8 OF 9UILDINQS'
TO BE LOCATED ON SMALL PARCELS AND CONCERN ABOU7 THE PRECEQEN7 TNAT
WOULD.BE E87ABLIBHED IN THE AREA~ AND SUBMITTED A LBTTER OF PROTEST
CON7AINlNQ TWO 51.GNATUREB OF OWNERS OF PROPERTY 1N ~HE AREA.
MRB. WOOD~ 1N REBU77AL~ 87'k7ED THA7 THfi APPEARANCE OF 7HE PROPOSED CON~•
SiRUCT10N WOULD NOT BE OF AN APARTMENT TYPE UNAT BUT WOULD RESEMBLE A
HOM6 AND THAT TNE UH1T8 Yi0UL0 BE EXPEN9IVE ~NiT8. SHE STATED FURTHER
TMAT 7NE PExIT10NER8 HAD CHOSEN '~HE NElGH80RH00~ BECAUSE TI1EY BBLIBVED
THE CONS7RUCTION WQULD tlE COMPAi1.8LE W17H 7HE OTH6R DEVELOPMENT AND
7HAT SHC ABU~'TINQ PROPERTY CONTALNED AN OLD HOME '[HAT WA8 1N POOR COND1-
T,I O N .
7HE HEARING WAS CLOSED.
~ ~,~'~F
~ '
r'. ''
r,
!
THE COMMIS810N ~~07ED THAT tHE EX1STlNa RESIDENTIAL DEYELOPMENT IN THE
AREA WAS ESTABLlSHED 8Y A YAR(ANCE~ AND THAT !T WAS CONSTRUCTED Lh
CONFORMANCE MtTH CO~E REQUIREMEN79.. I7 MAS POINTED,OUT TMAT'TH6 SUBJECT
PE217lON ~!D N07 C6MPLY WITH CODE REQUIREMENtS BECAU9E THE PLOT PLANS
CON7AlNED 1NCORRECT DIMENSIONS. ASSISTAN7 CITY ATTORNEY JOHN DAWBON
ApVISED THE COMNISS10k THA7' SHOL'~D jHE SUBJEC7 PE71T1pN FOR aECLA3SIF1-
CATiON OF XHE PROPERTY BE APPROVED~ 7HE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT MOUID
REQUIRE A VARLANCE FROM 7HE CODE REQW REMEHTS.
TNE COMMISSIpN FOUND AND IIETERMI.NED THE FOLLOWIN~ FACTS REOARDING 7HE
SUBJEC7 PE71710N:
1• T}lAT THE PE?!7lQkER REQUESx~ A R_°CLASSIFlCATION OF THE AflOYE 4E5~
CRIBED PROPERTY FROM THE R~A~ RESIDEN7I~L A3RICULT~URALy ZONE TO
THE R~-3~ MULTIPLE FAMI,LY RES(DEN7IAL~ Z01~~.
2. THAT 7NE PRGPOSED RECLASSIFlCATl01d OF SUBJECT PROPERSY IS NOT
NEC65SARY OR DESIRABLE FOR 'VE ORDERLY AND PROPER DEVELO~~MEN7 OF
SHE COWMUNITY.
3. ~HAT THE PROPOSED RECLASSIF1CATlON OF SUBJEC7 PROPER7Y DOES NO7
PRtlPERLY RELATE TO THE 20NES AND THHdR,PERMLTTEb USES LOCALLY
ESYABLISH6D IN CLOSE PROXI.tA17Y i0 BUBJEC; PROPERTY AND TO THE ZONES
AND SHE1R PERMITTED USES 06NLRALLY ES7ABLi5HED THROUQHOUT THE
CONIMUNITY.
4. THAT.PLOT ?Ll~NS OUTLININQ THE PROPOSED DEVEt.OPMEN7 OF SUBJECT PROPERiY
AND YHE 41DE YARD DIMBNSI,OMS DO N07 CONFORi 71T.xN CODE REQU7REMENTS
FOR THE R-3~ M~LTlPLF. FAMIIY RE41DEN71AL~ 20NE.
~_ : ~ ~
~
~' Q
~: '.
~:'!: - ' ~
~.. . , ,
~i
t
~ ~~
~
MINUTES, CiTY PLANNING COMMISSION, JuNe 12~ 196i, CONTINUED:
~:; ;
~ ~
~ .
215
RECLASSIFICATION ~ 5. THAT THE REC~ASSIFICATION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY NOULD SET A PRECEDENT
NO. 60-61-101 FOR MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING AND '~EVELOPMENT ON THE AREA.
CONTINUED
6: THAT VERBAL OPPOSlTION~ IN ADDITION TO WRiTI'EN OPPOSITION~ WERE
RECORDED AGAINST SUBJECT PETlT10N. .
COMM15510NER ALLRED OFFERED RESOLUTION N0. 288~ SERI.ES 1960-61, AND
Y COMMISSIONER PERRY
~
MOVED FOR 1T5 PASSAGE AND ADOPTION~ SECONDED B
R£COMMENPING 70 THE CITY C~UNCIL THAT PETlT10N FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0.
60-61-101 BE DEP~IED ON THF. BASIS OF THE AFOREMEN710NED FINDINGS.
ON ROLL CALL THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION WAS PASSED BY TFIE FOLLOWING VOTE:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ALLREDo MARCOU%~ MORRIS~ MUNGALL~ PERRY~ SUMMERS.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE.
QBSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CHAIRMAN GAUER~ HAPGOOD. ~
RECLASSIFICATION - CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING. PET4TION S"Ji3MITTED ev DEON STEELE ii4 PeN-
ENUE
A
60-61-91
NO ~
V
FSEID~ POMONA~ CALIFORNIA~ OWNER~ W. P. MASON~ 2966 LINCOLN
D AT 3042
.
~CONTINUED) ANAHEIM~ CALIFORNIA~ AGENT~ REQUESTING THAT PROPERTY LOCrTE
DENTIAL AGRICULTURAL~
RESI
FIED FROM TFE R-A
.
9
LINCOLN AVENUE BE RECLASSI
Z~NE (PARCEL 1} AND THE R-3 ~
p00D
M
~
T
(PARCEL
ZONE
RESIDENT~
FAMILY
MULTIPLE
SUBJECT PETITION CONTINUED FROM EARLIER ON 7HE MEETING.
REHON!VE
N
P
P
T
R
'
M
E
.
CONSIDERATIO
COMMi55lON
FOR
AVAELABLE
WAS
SUBJECT AREA
THE
TO
EVER~ THE ;'ETITlONERS HAD APPARENTLY MISUNDERSTOOD THE REQUEST THAT THE
MATTER BE HELO IN ABEYANCE UNTIL THE STUDY WAS MADE AVA.ILABLE AND HAD
LEFT THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
VICE CHAIRMAN MORRIS NOTED THAT~ ALTHOUGH PARTIES INTERESTED IN THE
SUBJECT PETITtON AND STUDY WERE PRESENT~ IT WOULD BE A~:OURTESY TO TNE
CH TItAE AS THE PETiT10NER WAS
PETITIONER TO CONT7NUE 7HE MATTER UNTIL SU
PRESENT.
MitS. PFEIL~ OWNER OF PROPERtY AT 3064 WEST LINCOLN AVENUE~ STATED THAT
T IT
T
E
S
E
H
T
~
O
D
THE SUBJECT
IN
PROPERTY
OF
OWNER
BAKER~
THAT MRN
POSSIBLE
BE
MI~HT
AR1EA~ WOULD BE ABLE TO ATTEND A LATER MEETING.
ERS
S
!
E
C~
!
B
M
D
E
M
COW
BE
61
91
60
NO
RECl.A951FICATION
FOR
PETITOON
CARRIEDR THAT
AND
TINUED UNTIL THE MEETING OF JULY 109 1961 AND THAT 7HE PETlTIONER BE
NOTIFIED TO AT7END SAiD HEARING.
TENTATIVE MAP OF •- SUBDIVlDER: DEON STEELE, 114 PENFLELD POMONAp CALIFORNIA.
VENUE BETWEEN BEACH
t
TRACT N0. 4230 1NCOLN A
TRACT IS LOCATED ON THE SOU7H SIDE OF
ENTY-FIVE (25) R-3
BOULEVARD AND HARDING AVENUE~ AND CONTAtNS TW
GHBORHOOD ~OM~
1
N
C
EI
~
-
MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL~ LOTS AND TWO (2)
MERCLAL~ LOTS.
SUBJECT TRACT t5 FIIED IN CONJUNCTION WITH PETITI.ON FOR RECLASSIFICATION
N0. 60-61-91.
C~MMISSIONER ALLRED OFFEREO A MOTION~ SECONDF.D BY COMMlSSIONER SUMMERS
4230 BE CONTINUED UNT.IL THE
MAP OF TRACT N0
.
AND CARRIED~ THAT TENTATIVE
MEE7iNG OF JULY 10~ 1961 1N VIEW OF THE COMMISSION MOTION 70 CONTINUE
NRNOT MAY
/
I
N
N
~
R
T
O
TI.ON FOR RECLASSlFICA7
TH PET
W
CONJUNCTION
IN
CONSIDERE'
BE
60-61-91.
RECLASSIFiCATION - PUBLdC HEARING. PETITION SUBMITTED ev RUSSELL J. AND MARY C. MURRAY
NO. 60-61-102 922 NORI'~1 ALAMO~ ANAHEIM~ CALIFORNIA~ AND JOHV T. AND SYLVlA CALLAHA~1~
101d NORSH'ALAMO ST,9ANAHEIM~ CALIFORNIA~ OWNERS~ REQUE571N6 7HAT
PROPiRTY DESCRIBED A5: A TRIANGULAR SHAPED PARCEL WI?H A FRONTA~E OF
365 ~EES A!1D LOCATE~ ON THE NORTH SIDE OF SEQUOIA AVENUE BETWEEN MORAGA
BOUNDARY`,OM TYE~SOUTH~TAND~fURTHER DESCRJBEDAAST9593ESEQUOI,AYAVENUEA55
ee RECLASSIFIItD FROM rHe R-1 ONE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, 20NE ro TSIE C-i,
NEIGHBORH.OOD CQMMERCIAL, ZON~.
MR. RUSSEL4 MISRRAY~ 7HE PET1T10NER~ APPEARED BEFORE 7HE COMMISSION AND
DESCRIBED THE PNESENT CONDI.TION OF AN EXISTIN6 BUILDIN6. HE STAT ED THAT
TFIE STRUCTlfRE WAS.BUIi7 BY THE STATE APPROXIMATELY FIVE YEARS AGO FOR AN
~ ARCHITECT~S OFFICE AND THAT THEY. HAD B~ACKTOPPED THE AREA ON THE S1DE OF
T~:E PROPERTY. HE STAYED FURTHER 7HAT HE NISHED TO UFILIZE THE BULLDING
" FO1: A COMMr:RCIAt.OFFICEo THAT HE,HAD JNVE57ED I,N IMPR~9VEMENTS WITHIN THE
- BUILOINO AND HA~ BLACKTOPPED THE FRONT OF THE PP.~pEr,TY FOR PARKINQ PUR-
POSES.. THA7 NE HOULD ABIDE BY ANY ENGINEERING DEPAR7MENT RECOMMENDATIONS~
AND THAi V,E 41A5 REQUESTINQ THE REC4ASSIFICAT!ON 50 THAT THE BUtLDING
COULD BE l°.FJ .
~
~
~
~ ~-~~ . ~..
!~ -..... ~ .
,. ~ . . . --~--~ .-,---~-,-- .--,~
l ... .~ .). .
,.. _~'iV../. .;[~~-r. ~~ . ~ ~
~
, ;
.'. t 1` M' ' ',y~., ) 4.},.: ~~: ,~~~~. ~~ ' . .
~
,~
. .~ . ' .
b ~~ .. ~. ~ ~ ~ .
~ ~
. . . . . . . .. ~~ .ry![)
k .
.
~ .
~ . . . . . ~i:~ . .
~ . . . ' . . . ... . .. ~.rr.,~. .y ~
.,. ~ . ~.. ....; ~~.~ ~. _...`
~ .
. .
.
~ ._..,~ ~ ~__
~ _ . , ~
a ~ ~ ~
~
~ . ~ ~:~~b a ' ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ . ~
• ~
~ :ie~+=_~•~
lIlNU7~~S~ CITY ?a.i-NNlpb CuFi~iiSSiuri, .iuk~ i2~ t~sl, C~a~ 3
,
RECLA5S1F1CATlON - 7HE iiFJlR1NQ MAS CLOSED. • . ~ ;
~
yG. ao~-s+.-so2 ~
~~jt~UED ' A{~~ANMLK4 DEYARxME~I3 S:UDY OF THE PARKyNfi AREA ANt~• LAND$CAPL118,•QF •-
N: StlSJiC7 PROPEhTY wN5 HU@MYTxBD ~Q.TNE.CGMM1S81b~M. NR. MUIRRAY RE-•
E
' , . a
' ~ ~•Z!~1A7 7H
•
y~.~160•THE••SIpDY 'tl'xH xNE COMMl58A0t1 AND l7 WAS PGANTED• ClY
Cz
PLAT ~P~AM 9UB'N3~T7~D MXTH•7NE•PETXS~'DN MA$•-A07• SIS~I~.9~
i1RRAY ~;M~1~,CAy6D
PRtl:}LR;iY 1N-REBARD t0 ~'NE PARKINfl AREA..I.AYCU7.• • MF_~
lil'~N IHB RKPARiMENx 9xUDf AND •67ATEE. 71'!A? HE MOW~ A~ A81t16
iRtSN:
` •
k;d,ltd
~t~?V ?kC0-AMENDAS10N8 MADE HY T~{E ~OMNISS~OK AkD T21Aj HE i:01~5lDERED
r
•
. ( p
~
' '?IlE 1':4QPOSAL,xO 8E A BEAtlIL~'J.CATlON PROGRAM. • ~ '
i
~ ~
~ T-C CC~~IM1.48iaN REQS1ESxL~• THAT ?HE PLANN~,NG DLFARxMEN7 6TUD'f BE MARKeD I~
AECdMNERDED A$ A PR[C18E ALAN• FOR• DEYEL.OPMENx OF
R AND BE
D
K a
4~
' y •
.
t~H~.81T•
TFii; ~~3:ll.~a PROAER~Y. .AREAS RE8'RV60 FOR•~XN9R[sa ANI~ '1aR~~~sr ~~TXP~g ~
INTERD6PARTMENIAL GG!:!1+!2TiE• RLC014M~~+:ix1.ON8~•RE4ATlY[ •
AND
WC ~
1
:
~ •
OF, CUP,o3,
t~
70•~1S~EMALKS M6RLr G13CUSSED. °ENblh~B ,':ECLA981Fl,~AISON 70 TH6 C°2t
. .QEMBR~.~ COMMlRCl,AL~ ZDNE OF PROPERxY'. ABCT.II,KG BUB~i!:T P.ROPERxY D-1 xME ~
y2SY IiAS ALBQ DlSCUSSED. • - ~ • ~•~~ - " ` ~
j„E COMML~iSAON F~UND AND CfliER~1~NED ~HE FOLLOqiilQ fAC7'l~ RE9ARD1l64 THE
~
Sde~IECT PETIt1.ON: , ~
1DNER PROP08E8.A RLCLASSI,FI.CATION GF THB A60Y~ ULS~
'
p6T~T
1: IHA7 7Y.E
CRI~Ea lROPERSY ~RGR THE R~1~ ONE' FAMILY R'ICSAD-.N71.Aty ZONE '~0 -=Hi
•• " ' ~
+
~ ' C~1~ NLIGNBORIlOOD COMMERCIAL~ ZONE. • ~
, i: TI~~~7 7HE DROP08ED R6CLASB~,FICA'~ION OF SNdJ~C'~ ~ROP6ft?,Y !5 £1~~E5lARY ~
OR DLSlR'A9L6 FOR 7HE RRDERLY AN6 PROPER Oi'VE~DPNCN7~OF *'~: ,' j
~
i
. . ~.0?IMUMSTY. .
3~ ~,~AT ?!lE PROPOS6G K!OUBSl~'1CA310N Or SdBJEC7 PRB:~E~-Y DGE!• PRO~
9 AND SNLtR•pLPMtx=LD Vi6S LOCALLY ES7AA~ .
iHE 20N6
76 TO ~
~
,
.
PRRLY•RCLA
L~DNLD•LN CL086 PROX~MITX ~TC. 9U6dECT P/1QPCP17Y .1C1° i0 7Nt`i0f1ES
AND SMElR PLRNi'~T~D 1,iS69 fiEN6Rr:lLY L~iAdLQa:!La SM'rl-U3M9U! 7MC
•'
GQklkUMliY. _ ~ ,
~ e . . q. TNAY YML rROP06ED R6' S. ':'SCA7k0-: OF SU~ySG. ~1t0~ERf ~ DOL6 NO7 •
STAKtiARD 1M~RDM~~~~Nx ~iF AQUTTiN~• •
'ds '-N~
~ ~
•~
R~QJl,11E ALDI,CATION
a~ZRL~TS lLCAIlSL 5A.•D "rROPCRTY ID QL! Pt~LAxL TA AND AOUx. UPON 57A[Q S
L lkPROV~~D T0 OARNY 'HS RY~L AND QUAN'~IiY F ~. ;
;
AN~ HI.AHWAYB •WMl,C9i AR
~ pA1dC6~M~THM'~NL ClRCULATI~^!~ZI.~tMLN7Y FHT.HLtGEN~RAL PLAN, ~'N ACCCR~ ~
~~ • 3. TMAT HO ONL APP6ARLD IN OP°OQ1x1,ON T.0 SUOJEC2 PL~I.~~ION. , ~ , ~
~ COMV.155AONLR 1~L4N~G GFFLicICQ ~ESOLU710H ND. :89~ SLRleS 1~J60~'6'1 AND
SECOND[D pY COMM155RONLR H~RCOYX~
'
" ~
~' '
~+ rlD ADOTTION~
.
NQ'ILD fOR 175 PA5SwJ6 .
Ed RtCONMLNC TO'TK.~ CITY GOUPCeCST70 TM[tfOLL01ilNA ROND~S1tlN5CAilON
.
102 a[ aRANTED
50~01 j
~
;
; ~
-
N0.
1. DtYLLO~MLNX AND PROYlS~ON OF PAR~tN4 ARtAS lN ACCORDAIiC[ NITN T,ME ,~
DLxA/L8 As 0U7LLkLD ON Ext-1,e~'~'!'A~. ~
2. ~N07AL1A"tION QF DRIV¢MAY APROri~ 1N.aCCORDaNC6 -1itM TH~ AP~RO;cD..
~ biANDARD ~LAMS RN-Fl~t tN TNE.,JlFIM! OF. TM~ CtTY ~N31Nt[R. ~
~
" 3. PRC'YtSION OP LANDSCAPLD AR{CAlV AM ACCORDANGi MITN TWS AASAS OUY~
x !W~• SAIC ~uNnac~pina X~'e~`aue~eFa' TD Tko '
NdD nu EXH4el
LI 7
;
.
,
AF~ROVA6 pY xHt SUPLRINT6NA~Ni ^_a ?'ARKWAY H~1NT.LNAMCE: j
~ 4~ tlAt Cld:I,TATl.~A OF NAN6FY (90) DAKS FOR IM6 ACCOiiFL1~HqLN7.OF'
AND 3
2 a
s
~ .
~
J.TLM NOB. 1~
I TNL FORxa~~l.llQ CCWDi,x'1aN9 MtRE R[C;[[0 A7 TM[ N6CXIN0 AND M[R& F0~1ND T.0
R TO 7H6 :1l1E U;' TML ~RG~LRiY IM ORCLA 70• PRh
1
S
6F. A. NILCLSSARY PRERLqU1S
';1ZEkS Of °.ME'CIxY 6F AMA~AEIM:
A~x6 OF TME G
'
p
Y AND M6LF
SqRYE TNL SAF6}
~ll ROLL CALL xME FORE60LNIl REBdLIJT1Uii VA6 PASSEG SY SHE ~4=~OMlNfl VOTfC '
F • AYES: CONM11SSl.ONERS6 A~~aeo~ MANCONX~ MORRIS~ NtlNBALI~ PERRY~ S{INMERB•
~ NpES: COMMISSIONERS: Ha~dF. • ~
~ ABSFNT: COMM1SS10NERS: CHk~,RMA11 ~aAU~R,~ HA~fl00p.
. ~ ';
~
RECLASSIFICATiON - PUBLIC HEA1:lN9. PE7ItlQN 5USM1.7~FD BY' R. l. COQiiS~ ~MNLR~ C/0 ~EOIIARD
~: 60~S1-o9 S~IITH, 12S SOUTH CLAUDINA ST1:£~L7~'AMAHSIN~ CAL~FORNxA~ Aa~MIi RE@UEli~
~;L 100 FEtT ~Y 13's~ itLt MJ,TH A
^
~: ;:
r~
PaK
.:
t G TMA; PROPCRSY GESCRl6~D N.
6~= ON EA82 (.xKCOLN A1~LNU6 AMD LOC~IaD ON THt NRRTH~ ~
~
. FNONTAQ~ OE.100 f
MLSTERLY CGRNEt~ Of Y1NE ,S7REBT AKD E 3'~• LI!(CQLN AVEl1tl[ AND fYR7NER
DF5CR14ED A5 913 .~eAB~t L~LNG~Llt AYICMUA 8L NLCLAS! FIGD ' RCPI xH6 1~3
'rns C-3~ t;~1fY C~~3iERCtat i~iB
ZQI1E~Ta
S1DEMiLAL
~
F
~
,~
~
>.:. .
>.
k7
1 .
~
: ~
.
,
AMILY R
NIILTIPLE
BY~~
R ra cxco ro SERY1~g 9ZA~'ACM ;15[~ AND 10 1lNRsIlY'RI~GZL C~`1~ b~l
H~~p ~OMFlERGJAL, ZONE. - • ;
i
~
t
~a.,::+:~.~ : ' ~
$U/JECT tLx•1F10N CONx1wUl[D PROM xNL NYSX[N6 Of NA't"L9~ 1961f
;
MR. LLOqAAa'$ M1xM~ AaLNT F.4R THL' pL'xlT,LQNCIC;, dND~CAFQ~ 7MAT F(e MOYLO
A40Rtlb 7Mlt ROMMxda/,ON LA'~LR lk TNC HSftilN4.
;...:
~ •
.~ ... _._.~.._,.1. . , ~ '~ . , , . . . . _ ~ .`~ ,,, ~ " - .. .. . , .,,--.-.
a :.~.: i _
~ _+.,~`,
RECLAS51F1CATION -•: PT. E. FL RHOADES~ 122 NORTH V~NE STREE~~ APPEARED BEIORE THE CONMIS~ ~ ,
HO 60~61~99 tJR ANR PROTESxED ABAINSI THE RECLASSIFICATAVri ^F THE SUBJECT PROPER7Y .
~
~ONTINUED ~ FOR SERI~ICE SSAT40N PURPDSES ~H1CH~ HE 57A7ED~ NOULD HAYE A DlSASTR005
_ CFFE~7 UPON 7HE CEN7ER OF 7HE C~7Y. CAPT. PHOACES'REYAEMED PAS7 DkFF1~
CvLT!.ES CkEATED BY.THE COMHERC-AL ZONINQ•OF PROP.ERi.Y A8uT~4Na 3~9JECi .
P~OPER~Y ~ND•IND'1CA~E0 THAZ HE HAD APPEARED BEF~RE zHE•CITY•COUNCIL • j
SEYERAL 7.fME6 TO COMP4NIN ABOU7 THE DCCUPAN75-U~14IZINQ•SHE AROPERiY• ~ I
• FOR H@AYY COMMERCIAL USES. •HE STATED 7HAT•THE•PE:ITIQNER•HA6•AWARE OF-
T(%E 23N1'nC OF SUBJECT PAOPERTY WHEN~THE PROPER7Y•WAS PURCHASED••AND 7HAx •
~ Tn5 RFQVES'ED ZONlN~ WOULD NOr BE COMPAT.48LE•MliH iHE•RES1DENilAL•DEVEL~
OpMENT 3N 7HE~AREA. .HE STATED FUR7HER ThRT HE~DID..NOx CONSiDER•7HE S~2E
~
OF:THE PARCEL AND TH8 LOCATION AS SU~7ABLE AND x1',AZ THERE NAS NO NECES-
S,L7Y FOR AN ADD1710NAL'bERV1CE STATlON NHEN THERE HERE Fl.VE OIHERS ..~~
~
WITHIN 7HE 1MqED1A7E AREA. • `
~R. L. E. DICK~M~ON~ 919 EASx CENTER STREET~ APPEARED IBEFORE 7HE COM~ ,
M4SS10N AND REVI°NED ?HE OBJECTI.ONS TO THE BUBJECT PETYT4UN THAT WERE
SUBNITT~D AT THE MEFTING ~F•MAY 29~ 1961. HE vo~cea DISSRTdSFACTION
MITH•THE CITY COUNCIL•APPROYAL OF A SERVICE 57A71.ON DEYEL9PMBNi ON~
7NE SOUTN S1DE OF CiNTER STREEt~•AND S'fATED 7HA7 HE P.~PRSSF.N'[ED zHE
SIONEF~SOF [HE RETI,TION OF PR07EST •SUBMItTED AGA1N87 TN~ rU6J6CT .PE4.,I,TjON•
H[ STA7ED FURTHER 7HAi rHE PROPER7Y SHOULO NOT 8E RECLASSiF1ED UICT14
BUCH 7'IkE AS THE ENTIRE 6LOCK NERE RECLASSIFLED. • •' •
MR9. EOWARD•BA1N~ 9U9 EAST CENTER STREE7~ AFPEARED BEFORE '~HE COMq18~ , •
' 910N AN- S?AT,ED'TMAT TNE PROPOSED USB WOULD 8E A HAZARD 70 THE CHILDREN
lN TkE 1FIClN1iY: • •
MRS. RHOADEB~ 122 NORTH V1~1E STREE7~ APPEARED BEFONt THH COMM1,85'sON
AND 97ATED SHAT 8HE KAS OPP09fi4 30'xNE SUBJECT PE~II'ION.
MR. LEONARD SM17H~ lN RE6UTTAL~ STA'iED THA',~~TM6 SERVICE STA~lON UNIT
MOUl.D NOT HE A HA2ARD Ta THE.CHlLDREN BECAU$E S.I,~EWALKS WOULD HE LN~ •
' S'fALLED~ AND. STATED Tl.:.i' 1'HE SUBJEGx PROPERiX WUULD NO7 BE UTI.LfZED
fi0R ANY C^`3~ HEAVY COMM7.RCIAL~ ~USE OIFIER TMAN 7'HE SERYICE BTAT~l,ON.
~:E S7ATED FURiHER THA7 A PRECEDENx HAD BEEN 63iA9Ll,BHED PERMITTINQ,
~ BLRVILE STA'f~ONS XN 7HElR6A~ THAT 70 PR~H1817 IH1S SPECIFIC 87ATpON'
W'}U1.0 CONS~'ITU7E A RESTRAINT OF TRADE~ AND THAT HE WAS (N AfiRE6MEN7 ,
• NITH 7HE SUQGESTION THAT 7HE EN74~E BLOCK 8E RECLABSI.FlED. ,
~R. DICKIN80Pl INQUIRED AB0~1: 7HE PO55lBIL1.7Y 0./,~ 7HL~ OWNER3 Of PROPEFITY •
,AN CEN7ER STREET (L1NL3LN AYEMUE~ ENTER;,NQ l,NTO !1 JOlNT ENDEAVOR FGR
lt6VELOPMENS'OF THE AR.A; AND NR. SMITH IND/CA~ED %'HAT HE HAD APPRGACHED
SOME pF THE OWNERS 6~ l.~n"vi°ER2Y 0~7 THE SOU7H 3iuE OF 7HL`' STREET J,N
REO~.D ;0 TH19 MA77l:R~ HOWEYER~ !SO PROApEbS HAL` BF.EN MADE IN 7HI8
RFSPECT.
xHE HEARING iiAS CLOSED. ~
~HL COMIAI.BSIaN REYI,EWED THE FI,NDLNOS OFFERI,D i.ND TkE ROLL CAL'. TAKEN .
. ON 7ME RD'lIUN FQR DENIAI Or ZHE SUBJECT PET171.ON AT THE MEETIKG OF
~. MAY 29~ 198i. ' ' '
• ABSI9TAN7 CITY AT79RNEY JOHN DAWSOfl AC:VISED TtiE CGIdM158i0H THAT ANpTHER
. R061, CALL ON TNE MOTION FaR•DENIAL KA4 :N ORL~~R AND tHAx A MAJORIfiY ..
• VOTE MOULG BE k~~E55ARY IN ORDEFS TO F~~R~:~:RA REC6MMENRATION~ '~k TNE
' WBd~~7 P?xlil'ON T.0 1'y1E ~:TY COUI~CIL. •
QN RqLI. CALL iHE MOT~ON FOR DEN:LAI. OlF xN2 Sf:Sda`C7 Fg:lxlOk~ AS.:OF`FiRCD
~ ~
_ A7 'LNE ~IEE7lld4 OF~ pAY 29; 1961 AY CORkXB:~11Gi1(Co MORRIg AND SECONRRD' BY1
iip;IMlB~AONER SVNMER9~ AAAZq FAII.EC xa Acl4l.-i16 'A MASOkXlY YOYE 6Y 7NE
FOLIOMlNG YOTE:
AYES: COMM,lS510NER5: ALLRED~ MORRlS~ SUMMERS.
NpESa COiiM1SSlONERS: Mnncoux, MUNliALL~ Pennv.
26
1961
~
J
T~
~
M
~
TO
U
TNN
'A
d
UNE
~
.
i UN
THE MEETIfIG OF
L
INUE
MATICALLY
CON
U
S
B
ECT PE
ION
TENTATIYE.!!AP OF - Sll901V-DER: NARJAN DEVEl.OPMENT COMPANY~ 16bS $OUTH STRfE7~ ANANEIN'~
TRACT HO. d030 CALIFORNIA.' TRhCT LS LOCATED.SOtlxH OF MAQNER AVENUE 680 FEET EAST
OF SpNK`I.ST S7REET ANJ COhTAlNS 96 Prtopc~sLe R;-t~ ONE FAMILY RESIUEN~
TIAL~ ~ors.
PLAdNJNt~ QEPAR'[Id6Nx STAFF REPORT WA$ B".MITTED T0 2HE CONM188lON.
A
,
~ IT WAS NOTE9 7HAT THE SU9~1_~7 TRAC7 I.S' BE).'ll6 PROCESSEb .THROUQH THE
CiTY OF ANAHElM AS PER PI.ANNI.NuI I;OMMISSjC~7 POL1.Y`ADOPT.EC AT 7HE
MEE7JNQ OF MAY 29~ 1961. ~.T MAS '!L=~ NOiED THA7 THE :iAHE TRACT,LS
BE111Q REVIEMED FQR REPORTS AND RECO~tM~NDA7lOKfl T!1 7H°.' GIRANQE COUNTY
" PCANNl.NQ COMM,lS81JN. QUE T.0 j HE F~.OT TNA7' 4~SCy CODES MUST BE APPl1ED ,
T0~ TH[ TRACT -CF PROCE55ED TARI.?ciH THE Ci,TX, IT itiL~ .'8¢ HEClSSBARY FOR ~
~;Y M'! ROYAL TO BE SU6JECY Ttl Tldc ,Fl,LlNG !!F A VARtAHCE. F~R THE E~UB-
YARIANC6 MOULD~ THERE~'
STANDRNU nu.`••lRSE CORNER LQXS AS PRUPOSEC. THE
.
FOR~~ HAYE TO COVER APPRGXIiAA7ELY )'OUR -.~L1 8_tw 'T!~ SU!'?~i /I,BION. THE
S7AFF REPORT REC~MNEkOED fURTH6k FFIAT A Cf,~Ni:.jilOK RL'~?U11:IM6 A•YAR1-
ANC~ aE .ATxA0Ii66 TO' ANY APPRpY,~1. AC.^. S'AT ~.l,ll THE EY1:ii7 AliNEXATlON
IS COkPLE7ED F1BFOhE F,(NAL,IZA7q!.T: f3F ~~!Cc ? R~\~i 1N xHZ COUki'Y~ THAS .7HE
~.
.,..' .~. .~_ ._....~._..~.~_ r . . .
.. . . 'v'.(,.Z~" .1~ ~~1 T^"'~~, .... . ,- i. ~ . ., .~;1 . .,.~f~'. ~~ r.....R~t~{. :CPe',`~..4...~'~:C;nti' ~ ~.~ _
. , ~ ~
i.
a
~
~ ~
". ~
~
~' ;. MINU7E:~ C1TY PIANNING COMMISSION, JuNE iz,..196i~ CON7INUED:
~ ,~;
S
c.. ~ ~ ~ ~
Nw
~ ~ 1. ~
.
. . , .
q.,y
~
.
r
,.. . . . 1
218
~ . :,
~. TENTATIYE MfiP OF - Ynrel.aNCe THEN BE FILED THROUQH THE CITY FOR THE WAIVER OF lOx DINEN-.
7RACT N0. 4030 SIONS~
r`,', THe COMMI,SS1,pN DISCUSSED xH1L PURP05E FOR PROCESSINQ TRACTS THROUQH
- 7HE CL7Y AND 1,T WAS~POINTED DUT 7HAT IN THE EYENT OF. ANNEXATION TO
~ '`
^ I
f
THE CISX~•7HE•RECORDAx10N OF THE F(NAL MAP MOULD TAKE PLACE IN THE
CI,TY~ AND ~HA7 8Y PROCESStNa )RACTS,4N TH15 MAN:lER FHE TRACTS MOULD
COAIPLY W1~7H •C1TY STANDARDS. • •
MR.-McDaNJ.E~~ OF MCDANIEL ENGIMEERIN(i COMPANY~ APPEARED BEFORE THE
' CONMISSION~ AND D~SCUSSED THE ftEA50N5.FOR SUBM1TilNQ THE 7ENTAxIVE
7RACT MAP 70 THE••COUtiTY AND TO•THE CONMl,5S10N. • •
MR. JOHN JACOBS~N~.REPRESEN~AxIVE FOR MC~ANIEL.EN4INEERINa COMPANY~
ABPEAREd BEFOR'E TME COMM155IOK AND INDICATED THAr REYERSE COFNER
LOTS N0. 1~~;~10y 11e.AND 27 WOU~D•PROBABLY REQUIRE A VARIANCE.~ HE
STATED~ HCWEyER~ iHAT THE TRACT, MAP MAX BE REy13ED LN ORDER x0
ELIMINA7E THE NECESSIYY F~R 097AINLN~ A VARIANCE ON ALL FOUR LO]'S.
HR. MCDANl,EL REQUESiED THAx THE~COMMl5S10N EXPE017E THE~MA~TER OF xHE
VARIANCE AS RAPIOLY AS POSSIBLE~ THE COMM15510N NOTED THAt•IHE PRO-
CESStNQ OF THE•VARI.ANCE MUS7 COMPLY Wlild•CODE REQUi,REMENTS AND THAT
IT WOULD REQUIRE AP°LACATJON AND LEOAL A~VERTISlNQ IN 2HE•MANNER
PRESCRIBED BY THE QNAHEIM•MUNICIPAL GODE. ••
COUX~AND~CARRMED~A7HAxFTBNTAI'IYE~MAPNOFSZRAC2ENOBY4030MGESAPPROVEDR
SiIBJECT TO iHE FO~LOWINa COND'1'flONO '
1: SUBJEC7 TO THE APPRO~!AL OF A PE71I'ION FOR VARlAkCE i0R THE ~0!
CIMENSfONS OF REVERSE CORNER LO'[S'N0. 1~ 10~ 11~ AND 27. ''
~ FHE COMMISSION xHEN DISC!JSSED THE REQUESTED SCN~DULI,NG OF A P~BLlC
HEARINQ FOR A PETI?ION FOR VARIANCE~IN RESPEC7 TO SAID ~pT Dj,MENSIONL:
COMMISSIONER IILLRED GFFERED A MOTION~ SECOkDBD BY COMM1883.DNER MUNGALL
A~+.D OARP:EQi ?!!AS ?kE DEY€6QP5R lAAK~ APP4lCAT~Oq FOR A PET:iION FOR
VARIANCE AND 7HA7 7HE MATTER BS SEI FOR PUBLIC HEARINfl ON JULX 10~
1961.
ITEM No. 1: ORANGE COUNTY TENTATIVE MAP OF TRAC7 NO.. 403~:
I
t
r
!'
~
• TtlTTENTA7lVEVMAPfOFMTRACTONON~4030~NWASPBU8M1T7ED~T0~7HEOCOMMIS810NE~
' SUBJECT TRACx I.S LOCATED BEiWEEN MAGNER AVENUE AND BALL ROAD EAST OF
SUNKIST AV[NUE ANO ABUITlNG THE WEST S~DE OF T.HE PROPOSED ORANQE
FRBQWAY„ SALD TRACT IS PROPOSED FOR 98 R~l~~ ONE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL~
LOTB COVERING APPROXINAiELY 26 ACRES.
THE COMMlBS10N HOTED.THAT TH6 SUBJECT MAP WAS CONBIDERED BY THE PLAN-
NINQ COMMlSS10N ~N ACCORDANCE WITH C~JMMISSION POLI.CY ADpPTE~ A7.7HE •
ME6TINQ OF MAY 29~ 1961• SAID POLI~Y PROVADES FOR THE PROCEBSINa OF
TRACTS TNROUGH 7HE C1TY BECAUBE CF POBSI.BLE ANNEXA7lON T.0 TNE CITY~
AND xNAT (N THE EVBNT OF SUCH ANNEXATION TO 7HE ClTY~ 7HE RECORDATION
CF 7HE F1NAL MAP WOULD ~AKE PLACE lN IHE C1TY AND WOULD COMPIY MITH
C1.'[Y S7ANDARDS. THE COMMlS81.ON ALSO NOTED 7HAT.TNE 5UBJEC7 TRACT
MOULD REQUIRE A YARIANCE FOR 7HE LOi DINENSIONS OF REVERSE CORNER
LOTS N0. 1~ 10~• 7.1~ AND 27 IN ORDER 70 COMPLY WITH ANAHEIM P1UN1C7,PAL
CODE REQUIREMENTS.
COMM1.9810riER AS.LR6D OFFERED A MOSLON~ SECONDED HY COMMl55LONER SUMMERS
• I~ND CARRIED~ iHAT THE PLANNJ,NQ DEPARTMEN7 TRANSMLT HOTXCE TO THE ORAN4E
COUNTY RLANN~Na COMM1581,ON THAT 7HE ANAHEIM PLANNINa COMMlSSION RECOR'^
MENDS ApPROVAL OF TENxATIYE MAP OF TRACT N0. 4030.AS SUBMITTED Tp AND
APPRUVED BY TkE ANAHEItA PLANNI,NQ COMMI.SS.L0~1~ 5lIBJEC7 TO THE FOLLOWING
CONDI'[ lON•
1. .SUBJECT I'O THE APPRGVAL OF A PETIZI.ON FOR YARIANCE FOR TNE LOT
DIMENS10N5 OF REVER4E CORNER LOIS NO. S~ 10~ 11~ AND 27.
17EM,N0. 2: ORANGE,COUNTY USE YpR~ANCE N0. 4775:
NOU GE.RECELVED FROM IHE ORANaE.GOUNTY PLANN1Na CONM18510N~ RE~ATIVE
'
COMMLSS).ON.
7d ORANQE COUNZY USE WAR~ANCE.NO. 4775~ MAS SUBMl.TTED TO THE
}'• : SUBJECT:PROPEfiTY`IS LGCATED'.ON THE SOUTHERLY'SI,DE OF PERALT.A NILIS
s DRI`LE•APPROXIMA7ELY 600 FE~x SOUxMERLY OF~~HE f.ASTERLY J.NTER5EC710N OF
,1~ ~s BA,LD DRI,YE AND 7NE RIYER5IDE.FRE6YAY .I,N.PERALTA HYLLS.
+
'~, . ~ y{ _ • : -
. . . .. . . .. . ,
PETITIONER REQUES7S A VARJ,ANCE'70 PERMIT 7HE_.USE OF A xRA1L6R FOR DWF~LL~
.
i i.rtT ING.PBRPGSEB ON 7HE BUBJECI PRQPERTY fOR A PER~;OD OF-ONE YEAR l.N IHE:
'
~~'~ a: OF
~1STRICT. SAlD xRA1CER M1LL'9E LOCA7EG ON THE REAR HALF
E4 E9IA7ES
t~'"t
~'u}•i .
7HE PARCEG°APPROXIMA7ELY AS :IND~C`A~'~D ON THE PLpS PIAN SUBMt'fTE~ W,1?H
'
,
~,;
~y OF. A, -l~M
' • THE PExl2I0N. THE PET1'f10RER 7NTENDS TO BEQIN CONS7RUCx~.ON
"
, HONE`AND'T0 9UB-CONZRACT ALC OF TNE~CONSTRUCTION`B67 ACI AS OENERAL
''~ ~ COHxRA~~oR FOR ?HE PROPO$ED CON87kuC'[ION. ~HE_PE?IIJOWER LN7ENDS T0.
U7IL~.2E TME'TRAI;LER'FOR DKELLINQ pURPOSES.ONLY. UN71;l.THE PR~POSED
i<
,y. ' ~
. . ' .. . . . . . .
~ 'I
~ :.
:
:P
,..~~~~ . . . . . . , ..
c . ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~
.. . .. . ~ ~ ~~ 13.'.''~c a~:S~"!i.x..?„ .~lrr, .I'''~.. u .._ . , ~.:;, ,. ..~.}.:: . `t . .;r,; ~ . . . '~' t.. ~..:x. h -~y::!~ .t~'ii ~_*dt.x.lRf.'rn~~„ ~L- . . . _ . ~. ~
~il~.
.. . , ; ~. .,, . ..
_ ~ .~
219
k ~ MINU7ES, C1TY PLANNiN~ C:,MMISSION; Ju-+e 12; 1961~ CQNTINU~D.
~ CORRESPONDENCE - lfeM No. 2~ CoNrinuec: ,ORANGE COUNTY USE VARIANCE N0. 4775:
CoNr~NUeo
~
CONSiRUC7tOH ~S COMPLEYED AND WILL CQMNECT xHE TRAILER T6 AN APPROVED
DISPOSAL SXS'[EM DURINQ THlS 1NTERIN PERIOD. •
TNE COM111.SSLOq REVIEMED iHE PL07 PLAN SUBMlT76D NC7H 7NE pETl,TYON AND
D7'§CUSSED TME LOCATION OF THE SUBJECx PRpPER`fY IN AN AREA CONIAININ4
9f.NQlE FAM1l.Y RESIDENCES ON APPROXIMAxELY.'~HREE IQ•FGUR•ACRE AARCELS.
COMMI.SS~ONER MUN~ALL UFFBRED A MOT1,0tly ~SECONDED. BY••CONMI.SSI,OER• PERRY •,
AND CARR~EDy THA2 THE PLANN;NQ DEAARtMENZ xRANSNlY NOTICE i;0 THE ORANQE
COUNT.Y•PLANNINa COMNASSION THAT THE ANAHEIH PLANNINQ COMMLSS~.ON RECOM~
M6ND5 APPROYAL OF USE VAR7,ANCE FERMJ,7 N0. 4775~ SU9JEC7' ZO THE FOILOM~
A~1a CONOAx10N•
1. TINE L1M1TAzlON OF ONE (1) YEAR FROM ~HE EFFECT~YE UAZE OF THE
SUBJECT PET.LTION FOR THE U5E OF THE SU9JECT PROPERTY AS OUiLINED
1N USE VARIANCE PERMl'I N0. 4?75.
I'~EM No. 3:. FULLERTON RECLQSSIFICATION•FROM M-P-2o0,000 To M-i.
NOiICE RECE~yED FROM THE FULLERTOii PLANNiNQ CONM.~SS~ON~ RELAi1VE '[0
R~CLASSIFICATI,ON FROM M~P"200y000 TO M~1 ON•CERTAIN PROPERxIES
S~,TUA~ED WjTHAN THE 7ERR1TORIAL LINITS OF 7HE C~,TY OF FULLERTOII; MAS
SUBMlYTED TO TME ANAHEJ.M•PLANHIM9 COMM•ISSlON.
THfi PROPOSED RECLASSIFLCATION ,l5 FRON AN jNDU5TRIAL PARK•CLASS'IFICA-
T10N 70 jHE LIOH7 MANUFACSURLNQ CLASSa~):CAT~ON. SUBJEC7~PROPER7Y
COYERS THREE PARCELS 7HAT•CONS717'UT.E ~HE NORTHEAS7~ H~RTHWESI~ AND
SOUYHWE87 CORNERB OF THE 1,NSERSE~i10N OF CYPRE55 AND ORAftQETHORPE
AYBKUES-~N T3!E C17Y OF FU[.LERTON. •• ~ - • •
7jiE•COMM188L~W DLSCUSSED TME LOGA710N OF THE SUBJECi PROPER'~lES AND
NOTED THAT IH~ PROPOS~II CLA581.FJ,CAT.14K tiCULD. ROT flE DEI'Rl.tdENiAL T.0 T.HE
SURROUNDINQ AREA: • . .. . .
CQMM18810NER ~ARCOUX OFFERED•A MOTION~ SECONDED BY•COMMLSSIONER SUMMERS
AND C~RRlED~ iHA'[ THE PLpNNING DEPARTMEk'[ TRANSMIT NOTICE 7G•THE'
FUI~ffRiON pLANd(MQ COMHI3SION THA7 7NE IiNAHI:IM PLANNING COMM1891,ON
RlCOMM~NDS AF`rTOVAL OF THE SU9JEC7 PET1Tl,OM BASED ON 7HE FOLLGMINQ
F1NDIWQ;. •
1. 1'HAT 7H6 PROPOSEQ RECLASSIFJCA7~ON GF SUSJECT PROPBRTI.BB IS
COMPAT191.6 M1TN iNE DEVE~OPMENT 1N 7HE ARBA. '
`
E
REPORTS AND
RECOMMENQATIONS
- 1rEM No. 1: RECOMMENa4TlON REGARDING AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER iB.52~
~M-i~ L1aHT MANUFACTURING ZONE.~
PL'ANNINQ DIRRCTOR RlCHARD R6ESE APPR,~84P ZHE COMMiSB ON OF THE DfVBL- "
OPMLHjB 1,N RBBPECT i0 iHE PROPOSED AMENDMLN7 70 THB ~~1~ L1GNx MANU~
FACIURINQ SBCTION OR xHB ZONI.NQ ORD/NANC6. HE STATLD THAT 1N Fe6RUARY~
1960 7H6 ~~'~Y COUHClL HAD REfERR[D TO THC PLANNlNG COMN188lON THE'
PAOPO~ED RCV~SION OF 7HE M~S.PORT~ON OF iHt COD6. A PUBL.[C HEAR~,NQ .
HAD 0[EN NELD~ SiATL'MENTS FROM BRYAN'ENT6RPRlSES~ MR. KIMES~ AND OTHER
LNTERESTED PARZIEB MERE HEARD~ AND 7HE COMMLSSION HAD REpERRED xNE 4
MAT=ER T0 7HE PLANN~NQ DEPAR7MEN7 FOR ADDI.TdONRL 87UDY. SiUD~CS NERE ~
MADE BY 7M6 DBPAR7MENi AND A DRAF7 MAS PRCPARED FOR A NEM M~S ZONE
MH1CH 18 ALMOST COMPLE'[ED. NO FURSMER PUBLI,C HEARIN9S WERE HELD~
7HERCFORE~ YHE ACTIOK.ON 7HE ~I~1 AMENDNEN7 J8 87J,LL PENDIN9. ON JUNE
6~'1961~ THE C~,TY COUNCf,t ADOPT,Lp THE PROPOS6D N~1 $ECTIOA AS AN
EMERQENCY Ot3DINANCE ON AN ~Ni.ERLM 9A5lS 3U887~ANilALLY,THE BAkE A8 NHEH
1T. MAS REFERR6D TO THE PLANNI.NQ COMMISSlON.' CONSEQUENiLY~ I,N Y/,EM OF.
7HE.CGUNCIL~B ACTION~'Ix HAS BE6N RECO~~CxOEp BY THE CITY COtJNCi~ ARD " ~.
THE CITY.ATXORNEY iMAT iHE RECCRDB OF.FN9 PLANNI~N~~COMNI]SSION`BE
CL6ARED BY FORKAL ACTLON TERMINA7l,NQ ~+":s,~DERAT~,ON OF. THE PROPOSED
AMLNDMENx AND OFFICIALLY. REFERRINfl'xHE ORDlNANCE x0 TME CITY AZT9RNEY~S
OFFICE FOR Fy7URE CONSIDERAT,~ON AS PART OF THE T07AL CONPR~HEN5I,VE.'
ZONlNQ.OftD1.NANCE 1,NC01tPORAT.INQ 7HE PROPOSED M~S SEC~'~ON CNRREN7LY BB1.N3
DRAFxED. •
PCANNINQ D4REC70R REES6 ADVISED ~HE COMM1851.ON 7HA7 }{E HAG SGHF~JLED
M6S7.[NG~ Wt7N BRXAk ENTERPRI.SES~ THE KlLROY COkpANY~ 7HE''CHAp9E~ OF
CONMERCE'~ AND.7HE BOARD OF REALxORS I0 REYIEN ASD'EVALUA~E THE .
AMENGMENx AND 7HE PROPOSE9 SECilONS 70 BB 1NCORpORAT6D (M THE NEW
ZCNING ORDINANCE.,'
COMMJ:SSI,ONER RARCOUX OFFERED'RE80LUTlON N0. 290~ SER~ES 1960-61~ AND ~
MOyED ~'OR 1T8 PASSAQE AND~ADOP7lONd BECONDED:BY CONMLSQJ,ONER ALLRED
7HA7 ~HE PLAMNING COMM1,S81~ON ACTl,ON ON xHE ANENAMENT TO CNAPT~R 18.52
OF: 7NE ANAilElld MUN,lCj,pAL CODC BE 7ERM~PIATED-AND THAT ORDiqANCE N0. ~
1~89 HE REFERRED T8 7ME C1'fY AxTOR11EY FOR.REV.1,~M AND 1NCORpORATiON' ~
1,Ni0 THE:NEM"1NDUSZRIAL 20NE SECx~ON OF 7ME'COGE.'
~N,ROLL CALL 7HE FOREQO1Nfl.RE50LUIXON. HAS PASSED BY'7HE FOLLOW~,Nfl YOTEi
~ ~
' ~~, .
;.. ;. .
. . . . . ~ . ~ . . "t ~ r ~~ r''
...,...4~ y.<.~.,,.~.~~i,.>.s:.~_rs~.:~~.z4 ,. ..~..... ~v...._,.a _~[ea. ,,...,.e..~,~gt.s.....:_..e.....~:u~t.,.~n.:•.~vn.~.e.,,.~.;~~ ..- . _,_. ..;`:4 a ,.'.'~„Y..avt
,~
z2o
M1NU7ES, C1?Y PLANNING'CpMM1SS10N. JuHe i2~ 1961~ CONTLNUED:
REPORTS•QN~ - AYES: COMM1SS10NERS: ~L.~aEC, MARC9UX~ MORR15~ MUNQALL~ PERRY~ SUMNERS.
RECOMMENORTtONS NOES: COMMISSIONERSS NONE.
~ CONT'iNUED ABSENT: COMMISS~ONERSI ~HAIRMAN GAUER~ HAPfl00D.
ITEM No. 2; LET7ER OF COMMENDATION: ••
VICE CHAIRIdAN MORRIS .lNiTlAiEb TME PROPOSAL THAT fi LE77ER OF COMMENDA-
71'ON BE •PREPARED AND TRANSMI•TZED~ LNDI.CAT.I;NQ 7HE PLANNI•t74••COHN•1,SSlON!5
APPROYAL OF SHE RECENT 1MPROVEMEN75 CQNPLETED BY THE UNITED STAT.ES
NA'f1,ONAL BANK~ THE LYNN HAWKINS PHOTOQRAP.HY~~AND BY xHE IIqAHElM SAYINQS
AND. I,OAN COMPANY. •
COMMISSJ.ONER MARCOUX OFFERED A.MOt1,ON~ SECONDED 9Y COMM138J.ONER ALLRED
AND CARR~ED~ ZHAI 711E SECRETARY OF THE PLANNING COMMJ.SSjON PREPARE AND
, TRANSMIT LETTERS OF COMMENDATION AS ];NDYCATED 70 '~HE DESi.QNATED ORQAN~
~ 1ZATLONS.
AISCUSSION: - RLANNINu COMMISSION VACATIONS: •
TPE COMN13SlON DISCUBSED 7HE MATTER OF IHE..YACATION.SCHEDUIE FOR.'~HE
COMMISSIONERS. IT. WAS N07ED 7HA7 7HE NECESSARY QUORUM YlOUCD NOT BE
PRESENT FOR zME MEE7INQ OF JULY 10~ 1961 UNlE55•xHE VACANCY ON THE
COMM1S810N WERE FIL~ED. IT WAS AL50 NOTED FHAT THE COMMI.SSl,ON A3ENDA
~ HAp BEEN INCREASING AND THAT ~7 MOULD WORK A CONSIDERABLE HARDSHI,P TO
DELAY ANY MEETINQS.~ -• ..
PLANNINQ DIRECIOR RICHARD REES~ STATED THAT HE WOULD CALL THE MA7TER
TO 7ME AT7EN710N OF 7HE C1TY COUNCIL IN THE HOPE THAT AN IMMEDIATE
APPOINTMENT MOUIG BE MADE TO F1~L THE VACANCY AND PROVIDE iHE NECESSARY
~~ QtlORUN.
IHE MEE71N~ MAS ADJOURNED AT 6:30 ~I~CLOCK P.M.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMI.iTED~
~ EC ETAR
: "i
. ~ ~ . .
~ , . . .~ .
.
,
.. . .. .. , . .
' . ., . . . .
- '_ . ~ .
. , ' .
~ . . . ~ ~ , '
' . " . . . , . . .
.. . . .
_
. .. :' .. ~...~ .
, ~ , . . .
~ . . .
. ~ . . ~ ' . . ~ ~ .. . . ~ . . ' . . . . . ~ . ~ . .
. .
.. . . -
. .. .
. . . . . ..
. -
. , .'
.. . . ~ . '
" . . .
.
...- ~
. .
._
',
;...
t::'.
>,
4 ..
..~.;.
. ~j
m !-i
.. ~. : ~ ri S., ~ a. ~::~
.. ..~f9~
. .. .. ., ., .
r~~~~.--._:~~~-.T,...,~,..~. ~ :-~,,.~~.Sr.. cnl._,.:i: ..,
:r.:~i~:' r_._..Fr.t:r~;uK~...:~.-.~;o.; ^ ~.~:~.~- ~
~ ".
~ t
T .:~~: ,.
.ef~ti.,