Minutes-PC 1980/05/19~ ~} >
City HAII
Anahelm~ Californla
May 1~ ~ 1980
REGULAR MEETING OF TII~ ANANCIM CITY PI.ANNING COMMISSION
~~~~ r~~.w ~
REGULAR - The regular meettng of tha Ana~eim City Plenntnc~ Commisston was called
MEETlNG to order by Chatrwoman Barnes at 1:33 P.m.~ Mey 1g, 198A in the
Cou~cil Chamber~ a quorum betng ~re:ent.
PRESENT • Chairwanan: Barnes
Commissloners: Devid~ F~y. Ne~bat. King
(Commlssio~ers aushore end Tolar arrtvad at 1:~5 p.m.)
ALSO P'RCSENT - Jack wh I tc Ass t sten t C 1 ty Atto~'n~y
Jay 71tus Office Enginesr
Annika Santalehtt A~sistant Otrector for Zontng
Dean Sherer Assistant Planner
Edith Fiarris Planning Commisston Secretery
PLEOGE OF - The Pledyc of Allegtance to the Flay was led by Cnmmissloner F~y.
~LLEG I r~MCE
APPROVAL Ot' - Commissfor~er qavtd offcrcd a motlo~. seconded by Corm~lsst~ncr lCing
T11E MINUTES ancl MOTIOW CARRIEO (Commissioners Bushore and Tolar being absent)~ that the
minutes of the mecting af May 5~ 19P0 be approved ~s submitted.
Lamrnissicx~e~5 t3ushc-re and Tolar errived.
ITEM NA. 1 PUOLIC tIEARING. 04J~~ERS: CIIESTER PETERSON AND
~~~RICAL EXEMPTION-CLASS 3 BEVERl.Y Al~t~ COMPTO~~~ 221 florth Meplewood~ Orange, CA
UAR ANCE N0. ~1 ~; 92G6G. AGEr~T: HERCURY SAVINGS AND LOAN A5S4CIAT~Of~~
P. 0. Box 1010~ Iluntington Seach~ CA 92647. Pettttoner
requeats WAIVER Of MAXIMUM NUME~ER OF WALL SIGNS TO
PERMIT 't110 WAII SIGNS on praperty descrtbed as a recLangularly-sheped parcel of land
cnnsisting of approximately 0.7 acre lacated at the no~thwest corner af La Palma Avenue
and Imperial llighway~ hsvtng epproxlmete frontages ~f 197 feet on the north stde of La
Palma Avenua and 150 feet on the west stde of Imperial Nighwey~ and furthe~ described as
5677 Eest La Palma Avenue (Mercury Savings b Loan). Property presentty classified CL(SC)
(COMHERGIAL. LIMIT~D} ZOHE.
SubJoct pttition was cantinued from the meeting of M~y $~ 1~80 far revised plans.
There was nu vne ir~dicating their presence in oppos(tton to subJect request~ and although
the staff repart to the P1an~Ing Commtasion dated Msy 19, 1980 was not read at the public
hearing~ it is referred to and made a part of the minutea.
Mel Kapso~~ representing Fb ~cury Savings and Loan Assoclattnn~ explained at the prevtous
publtc heari~g the Commission w~s concerned about the siie and nurtber of proposed signs
and thr revised plans are in accordance with suggestions.
TNE PUBLIC HEARING WA5 CLOSEU.
~:;, ar,_~r 5/19/80
~
~ 3
MINUTES~ ANANEIM CiTY PLANNING COMMISSION~ MAY 19~ 19~0
Ela CATEdORICAL EXEMPTION•CLASS ; ANO YARIANC~ N0. 14~ (CONTINUED)
~~~r~~~w~~~ ~~~ ~~~
/
8~•297
Cortimisslo~er Ilarbst felk thts ~ovised plan co~forma to the Stgn QrdlnAnce~ therefore the
varisnce fs not necessary.
Jeck White~ A~sistant Clty Attorney~ explntned if Lhe Commisalon feels the ptans~ as
modiflad~ do conto Rn to Coda, tf~ey mey wish to off~r A matlon to that effect and the
petltioner m~y wlthdrew hts request for ~ variance.
Commisstoner Tolar ai!ered a motion~ seconded by Cc~nr.ilsstoner Fry and MOTION CARRIEO
unanimoualy~ thet the A~ahetm City Planning Canmission does hereby find that the revised
plans do conto~r,~ to the Siyn Ordi~ance~
Mr. Kapaor~ ssked that the Petl tian for Variance ~~o. 311~~ be wi thdrawn.
ACTIONt Commtsstone~ Ilerbst offered a motion~ seconded by Commisslo~er Tola~ and MOTION
~D~ that the Ansheim City Plenning Commissio~ does hereby grant tho petltioner's
~aquest to withdraw the Petitian for Varlance No. 314y on thc basis that submltted ptens~
es modifled~ do canform ta the Sign Ord(nance.
Camrnisslone~ aushore asked ebout future simllar rcquasts ~nd Annike Santalehtt, Assistant
Uirector for Zon(ny~ stated staff would approve plans for baslcaily the same proposal~ but
any varlations wou~ld be brought before the Commission.
ITEM 1~0. 2 PUBtIC HEARING. OWNERS: MEL':'t~ D. AIIQ
~T~~VE DCCIARATIOW ALIW RUTII HILGE-~FEIp~ 1<~~ E.ast ~roadwby~ Anahelm~
~~ N. _g0•3b ~q 9Zp0y. AGENT: JOHt~ f. SWiNT~ 707 West North
1~~a` AN, E t~0~ 3 Strcec~ Anah~im~ CA 92805• Prop~rty d~:scribed
' es a rectangulerly•shape~ parcel of isnd co~sistlny
of approximat~ly 0.35 acre having a fro~tage of epproxlmately 100 feet on the west side of
Claudina Strcet. havfny a maximum depth of approxim~tcly 15-~ feet~ and t~eln~ lotated
approximately lE1Q feet snuth of the centerline of B~oadway~ and further descrlbed as 315
and 319 South Claudina Strcet. Propert~+ presGntly clessified RH-12Q0 (RESIDENYIAL~
NUI.TIPLE-FAMILY) tONE.
REQUESTED CLASSIFICATiQtI: CL (COMIIERGIAL~ LIMITED) ZO~dE.
REQUESTEO VARIANGE: MINIMUM LW~IDSLAPCD SETBACK
There was ar~e perscx~ tndlcating that he had a question on subJect request, and although
the steff repr~rt ta the Planning Commisslon dated May 19~ i98o was not ~e~a. at the publtc
heartng~ it (s refer~red to and made a parc of the minutes.
Mielvin Hilgenfeld, awner, explained hls request ls to ex~and the wo~king portton of the
mortua ry which has not chbnyed stnce 1g39; that they purchased p roperty south of the alley
for future expanslon and it is naw necded; that they propose to remove one restdentla)
atructure to p rovlde additio~a) parking snd they own the adj~ecant praperty snd plen a
larga gsrage fo~ 1lmouslnes or cartege parking of the mortuary v~hiclex. He expiai~ed the
walver of minimum landscaped setback for th~ garage is requested beceu~e the prope~ty
immediately adJ~cent i~ overgr4-vn with weeds a~d the prope~ty to the west ts develoQed
wtth e garage and carwash. The waiver of required site scraening is being requestad
bau use the use of the residentisl structure will ~vt be changed nnd the only changss will
be to the front po~tlan; thet the ro is a fence between the two and he dTd nnt sae eny
raason for site screening; how~ve~, if the property is ever developed in any ather way,
chen it Nould be ner.assary.
5/19/8p
;-
~~
i ;
MINUTES~ ANAHEIM CITY PLANNiNG COMMISSION~ MAY 5~ ~980 80•298
EIR NEGATIVE DECLARATtON~ RECLASSIFlCATION N0. ~9-80•36 and
NARIANCE N0. 3149 (CONTINUEO)
-----~----- -
Mr. H1lgenfeld explsined he recelved a copy of the staff report late Saturd~y and In
reviewlnq lt~ ~oticed a conditlon has been added that the existing r~sidentla) structure
located on the southern po~tion of the property be brought up to minlmum codes; and that
he had talked with a representativ,e in the 6uilding Oapartment who indicste!d there was no
requtrement sinc~ It is not being changed.
He polntad out that an omisslon ht~~ been made In paragraph (y) of tl~e staff ~eport.
regerdinc~ the existing structu~e.
Frances Howard, owner af praForty at 3z1 and 323 South Claudina, and ~AStdas st 1y20
Cerrltas Avenu~s~ Anaheim~ asked why a block wsll is not beiny required on the south
prope~ty ltne~ indicAting concern that bodies wouid be brought in. Ile stated there is an
old reaidenc~ on his p~operty which he will tear down eventually.
Mr. tieward revlewed the plans and indic~ted he is sattsfted wlth the request.
Mr. Hilyenf~ld explalr~eci na bodtes wtll be brought i~to the garagc and thAt the mortuary
work wlll continue wlthin the confines of the buildiny and the entrance wiil be on thel~
,oraRerty.
T;IE PUUII C HEARI NG NAS CLOSED.
Respo~ding to Commisstoner Ktny's quostlon, t1r. Hilgenfcld explained the south side of the
garage wtll be on the south property llne and to Chairwoman B~rnes' questlon that th~re is
currently a fenca~ but no wall~ on the sauth property line.
Commtsstoner Nerbst stated if the axiscing re~iJenc~ ts evar changed from a rasidenttal
use~ it wou~d havo tc be upgraded and Deen Sherer, Assistsnt Planner~ explsined a sCand~rd
condttton is ~ecommended whenever a residential propc~ty Is fn+proved in this mdnner~ but
if the 8ullding Deparcment does not think It ts necessary~ the Commtssion cen delete the
conditton.
ChatrwcMwn Bs rnes w as concerned because of the reclassification since a six-foot wall is
normally required between residantial and conmercial uses and feit a wali should be
constructed now or a stiputation can be made that tf and when the property is developed~ a
wall wtll be constructod.
N~. NElgenfeld did ~ot think a wall would help anyxl~ing at Lhe present time.
Commissioner Bushore did ~ot see any need for a wai) and noted the neighbor has alre~ady
indicated he will eventually develop his property and since it (s not not known how it
w{11 be developed. e w~ll may not even be necessary then; a~d that subJect property Is
surrounded by commercial usea and he felt thts ~vill vastly improve the area.
Commissioner He rbst ciarifted that the variance Is only for the 44-foot ga~age anci
de weiopmnr~t of the remainder af the property would requtre tho wall.
Ch~in~+eman 8arnes wss concarned that posstbly the property to the south would be developed
comrtiercielly and Oean 5herer clarifted that c.ommercial use of the residentla) structure
would require a condtttonal uso permit and Jack Whjte expiained this veriance wiil only
reiste to this parttcular development. Ne uiso expletned a conditto~ cauld be added that
tha rvell will not be required until such time as the ~esidontia) structure Is oonverted to
conrae rc ~ a 1 us e.
?~t 5/ t9/BO
i~`':'~~".. . . .
~
MINU1'ES~ ANANEIM CITY PIANNING CQMMISStON, MAY 5~ 1980
EIR NEGl1TIVE DECLARATION~ aECLASSiFICATIQN N0. ~g-80-36 ANo
VARIANCE N0. ;149 (CONTINUEO)
~w~ ~~r~~w
80- 299
ACTION: Commisstoner King offerad a motinn~ seconded by Commissioner David end MOTION
~D~ that the Anahelm City Planning Commisaton has revtewad tha proposat to reclassify
subject proporty from RM-1200 (Rasidentidl~ Multiplc-Famtly) ionc to CL (Conrnerclel,
Llmited) Zone to expand an existing murtuary with walvers of mintmum landscaped setbsck
and requlred slte screening on a ~ectanyulerly-shepad parcol of land conststing of
approxin~teiy 0.35 acre haviny a frontaae af app roximately 10~ feet on the west side ~f
Cleudina Street~ having a maximum depth of approxtmately 154 feat~ and being located
approxlmataly 1130 feet south of the centerline of ~roadway; and does hereby approve the
Nagetive Declaratton from the ~equirement to preparc en environmenta) trtpact report on ths
basis that there would be no significant indlvidual or cumulative adverse envtronmenta)
(mpact due to the epproval of this Nec~atlvt~ peclaratlon since the Anah~(m Ge~eral Plen
designates the sub)ecr property for medium-density residential land uses commensurate wtth
the proposal; that n~ sensittvc anvironmental tmpacts are tnvolved in the proposal; thdt
the Initla) Study submicted by the petitloner lndtcates no slgntflcant indtvidua) or
cumulative adverse enviro~menta) Impacts; and that the Ncgattve Ueclar~tton substantlating
the foragoing findinys Is on file (n the Ctty of Anahelm Planninc~ Department.
Commissto~er King offered Resalution t~4. PC80-3Q ~nd moved for its passage and ~doption
that th~e Anal~eim Clty Planniny Commissiun does hercby grant the Petltlan for
Reclassification No. 7'1-80-36~ subject to Interdepartmental Conmittee recommendations.
On roll ca11~ the foregoing resolution was passed t~Y the folivwiny vote:
AYES : COFW 1 SS I Ot1ER5 : ~ARtIES ~
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
AOSENT: COMMISStONERS: NONE
AaSTAiN: CONMISSIONERS: QUSNORE
OAVID~ FRY, ~IER4ST~ Y.ItIG~ TOLAR
Cammiasianer Kiny affered Rexolutton No. PC80-81 and moved for its passage and adoption
that Lhe Maheim City Planning Commission does hereby grant Petition for Varlanca Ho. 31k9
on the bssis of the fimited slze of the prope~ty and strict appitcation of the zoning code
wc~uld deprive sub,ject property of a p~ivilege enJoyeci by other prope~ty in the ssme zone
and victntty, and subJect Lo Interdepartmental Commtttee recomnx ndattons.
On roll call~ the foregotn~ resotution was passed by the follvwing vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: DARNCS~ DAV10~ FRY~ NERBST~ KIt~G~ TQLAR
NOES : CQMMt SS IOFIERS : NOtJE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
AnSTAI N: COMMI SS IONERS : HUStiORE
Commissioner Bushore explained he had abstained from voting because he was prevtously
employad by the petitloner.
5/19/80
~~
~ ,
MINUTES~ ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION, MAY lg~ 19~ 80•300
1TEM N0. PUBLIC HEARINf. OWNER; Nt1ME5 E1Y LYTTI.E~ 12$31
~VE DCCLAMTION NewPcrt Avonue~ Tustin~ Cl1 92f~60. AGEI~T: J. P.
1 ~ N0. 11122 KAF'P AND ASSOCIATES~ SQ1 Park Center Drtve,
Suttc 20~~ Santa Ana~ CA 92~OS. SubJect property
conitstiny of approxtmately 6.12 acres having a frontnge of Apprax{mately iGAO feet on tha
west side of Country H111 Road and a frontaye oF ~pproxlm~tcly tn75 feet on the east ~ide
of ~ld Uridge Road~ having a rnaxlmum depth of epp roximat~!y ~+~ feet end being tocated
approximatcl 670 feet a~uth af the centcrltn~ of Mohler Driva Is propnsed as a~-lot~ RS-
11S-~2~t10f1(SC~ subdivlsl~n. Property presently clASSifled RS-A-43r~~1~tSC) (RESIDENTIAL~
SINGLE-FAMIIY) ZONE.
There wes no onc Indicatiny their presence ln o~roaltlon to subJect request~ and although
thc staff report to the Planniny Cc~~mission ~f~-tcd May 19~ 19~:A was not reac! ot the publlc
hcaring~ it Is referred to anrf made e part of the minutes.
It was noted the pct(tloner was not p~esent; hcnacver~ tt was the ~onsensus of the
Cor.misston since thcre was no op~sltlon~ thnt thcy would act on Chc r~att~r,
ACTION: CommissionEr Kln~ offered a rnatlon~ sccondcd by f,ommtsstoner Tolar and NQTION
C t EU~ tfiat the ~naheim City Plmnniny Commfss(on hes revletived th~ ~ roposa) to permtt e
f~-lot~ RS-HS-2:.'~OOn(SC) Zone subdlvis(rn on an ~rregularly-sl~apecf pArcel of lend
consisting of approxirtwtely f,.12 Acres~ havinq a frontag~ of approximetely 1600 feet on
the wcst side of Country Hllts aoad and n frontag~ of 10%y feet on the east side of Otd
aridga Roaci~ havin~s a rneximur~ depch of ap~roximately ~-f3~ f~et a~d beinc~ iocated
approximately G70 feet south of che centerllnc of Mahler Drlv~; end dc~es hereby approve
the I~eyatlve Declaratian from th~ requireme.nt co ~reparc an environmental impact report on
the basts th~C there would be no significant tndividual or cumulottve adverse
environrt~ntal lmpact <iuc to the approval of this tlegatfvr Declaratton stnce the M ahetm
Genera) Plan designates the subj~ct property for hlllslde estaCe density land uses
c~mmensurate wiCh the proposal; thac no sensitive environrt-ental im~acts are involved in
the p roposal; that the lnitial Study submitted by the pctltloner indicatcs no signlftcant
indivtdue) or cumulative adverse environrnentnl impacts; that tt-e Negative Dacla~atton
substantleting thc foregoir.y findtngs Is nn ftlc In thc City of AnAheim ~l~nntng
Ot~ertment.
Commissicx~cr King offered a mottan. sccon~ied by Commfssfoncr Totar end MOTION CARf~IED
unanimously~ tl~at the A~aheim City Plann~ng Corn~nission does hercay ftnd that the ~roposed
subdtvtslon~ tagether wlth its d~sign anci improvements~ Is consisttnt with the City of
llnahetm Ceneral P1an~ p~rsuant to Government Code Sectt~n 66b73.5; ~nd cfaes~ therefare~
approve the Tentative Map of Tract No. 11122 far a G-lot, RS•NS-22~~Od(SC) Xone
subdlvision, subJect to the fotlawiny condttions:
1. That should ihis subdivision be d~vctopcd as rtare than one subdiviston~ each
subdlvisiun thereof shail bc submitted in tentatlve fo rn- far approval.
2. That eli lats within thls tract shali be served by underground utilities.
3. Thot the o~lginal ciocui»ants of thc covanants, con~iitlons, and restrictlo~s~ and a
letter addressed to developer's tttle company authortzing recordation thereaf~
shell be s~mttted to the Ctty Atta~ney's aff~ce and approved by tfie City
Attorney's offtce a~d Engineering 7tviston prior to finel t~rct map approval.
Satd d~cumnnts~ as ap~roved~ shall be filed and recorded in the Office of tha
O~ange County Reca~der.
5/19/&1
~,.~
~C
MINUTBS~ ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION~ MAY 19~ 1980 8~•301
EIR NEGATIVE DECLARATION ANO TENTATIVE MAP OF TMCT N0. 11122 (CONTINUEp)
4~ An e roslon siltation control plan must be submltted to and approvad by the
Californta Re~tondl Watnr QuAlity Contral ~oard, Senta 11~a Region~ prior to
issuence af a greding permlt.
5, That tl~e owner(s) of sub)ect proporty shall ~ay eppropriate dratnage ~i~assment
fees to the City of Aneha ~ as cletnrmined by the Clty Ergineer prior to tssuanca
of c~ building permtt.
6~ That the owner(s) nf sub)ect ~raperty shni) pay the traffic sic~ne) ~ssessment fee
(Ordinence No, 3896) tn an am~unt as determined by the Ctty Council~ for each new
dwelling unlt p~ior to the (asuar.ce af a butlding permit.
7. Th at the ownor of subJect pro~erty shall pay to the City of Anahetm the
appropria'te park and recrcatton in-lleu fec- as dotarmtned to ~. appropriatQ by
tho Clty Councll~ sald fees to be pn)d at tt~e tirt-e the bullding permit is issued.
F1. That thc exlgtina storm drnin and entrance b~sin and structure shall be extended
and relocated upstr-.?m es requt~•ed and approved by th~ City Enqine~r.
y. That a fire hydrrnt sholl be installQd an Co~mtry t~tl) Road~ bA0 feet south of
the exlscing fi re hydrAnt locate~ et Country I11 I I Road en '~ista Jel Sol.
10. That any speclrr~n tree ~emoval sh~li be subject to the regulaticros pert~+ining to
crec preservetion ln the Scenic Corridor Ove~lay 2~ne.
F'nllowing discusslon of Item tlo. 1~, tt was noteJ the petitionc~s were present~ t~nd Annika
Santalahti ~ Asststant Ui rector for Zoning, stated che liorse Trat Is Ca~mt ttue had saveral
concerns. 5he rclstcd thcy have ~sked far faur condi ttons as fol l~~ws:
1. D~tveway access fo~ lots 1 through 4 shail not cross the trati.
2. That a rai) fencc be (nstalled alnng Old Bridge Raad conslst~nt wlth an exlsting
fence on Country tiill Road.
3. 7hat a low~r pad on Lat No. 4 could ~e eliminatcd t~y movfng the trail along the
sautheas t end southwe,s t p roperty 1 i ne to e 1 i mi nate the ress t dUa 1.
4. Th at the accass road for the storm ctrain be paved with soi) cement.
Jay Titus, ~ffice EngineFr. explalned it may bC posaibla to Just pave th~ access to the
structure and not the entire resement area.
Jim Mathews~ englneer, cxplained he had discusscd these recommcndetions wtth 14nnika
Santalahtl and is s atisl`ted they can be worked out ~s requested.
5119/80
~__
~ ~ 1 ~ ~
MINUTE~~ ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION~ MAY 19, 1980 3~2
I TCM ,.NO.,t ~4~ PUBL 1 C HEAR i ~~G. OWNEaS s NORMAN A. AND LORNA
~TI~~IEGATIVE DECLARATION ROBSON~ 6773 Tlkt D~tve~ Cyprass~ Cl1 90634. AGENT:
_~ , 0~2018 PHILIP F. MIRAGLIA~ 2627 West Braadway~ A~ehelm~ CA
92aQ1. P~titloner requests permis~lon to PERMIT AN
AUTO REPA1 R SNOP IN THE ML ZONE on property describ~d
as • rectangularly-shaped pa~cel of land consisting of sppraxtmately O.WS ~c~es located
•pproxtnwtely 370 feet north of Lincaln Avenun~ and 660 feet e~~t of Crescent W~y~ having ;
a maxlmum depth of ~pproximatety 113 feot~ and further descrtbed as 1773 West Lincoln ;
Avenus. ;
There w~s na one indtcating thei~ presance in oppoaitlon to subJact request~ and although
the stsff report to the Planning Con~nta~ston dated May 19~ 1980 was not read at, the public
hea~ing~ tt ta ~efe~~dd to +~nd made a part of the minutes.
Phlllp F. Mtraglla~ 2G27 uest Broad-ray~ wes preaent to enswer ~ny questtons.
TNE PUBLiC NEARING WAS CLOSED.
Respondtng to Commissione~ Totar~ Mr. Mlreg! te expl~+in~d hls leesc w111 be for 3 Ye++rs.
Commissloner Toler f~it thc uso should b~ review~d In three years end Conmissioner King
agreed.
Commi=sloner Nerbst clsrified that all work and stora~e will be tnside the fscility.
Dee~ Sherer~ Assistant P18nner~ statcd tha Tra`ftc Engtneor has requestod that the
cc;~ditlon be adci~d requlrtng payment of trafftc signal fees of the difference beMeen
Irniust~lai and commercfal rates.
Cammisstane~ To{t~~ was not sur~ thts cost shouid be borne by the lesaee and Mr. Sherer
explslned no~nuilly when thera !s a request for a c.cmdttlan~l usa permit for thts type
attivi ~y. thts condi tlon IS add~d.
Annika Santalahtt~ Assi~t~nt Dlrector for 2onl~g~ explained the dlfference in the fee 1:
approxtmstaly SiAO per squa~e foot ,nd noted the tees wer~ r~centiy medifted and ~he w~s
not ~u~e ot the exact f 1 gure.
M~. Mi~ag1(a steted his ~~se would c~aate loss traffic thsn an industriat use s~d explained
the property ewner is not present~ but he could call htm.
Annika Santalshti e~leined it has been the Trafftc Engtncer's practi u to requnst the
tees for this type actlvity ~nd that ho figu~es hls rstes o~ the sverage automobile rapalr
f~ci l t ty.
Jack White. Assl~tent City Attorney~ explalned if the traftYc signal assessment c.or~dEt{on
ts added~ anather public hearinq wauld ba requi~~d to delete tt and M~. Nt~aglia stated he
w)1) pay the tees 1 f ihe prope-• ownar wi 1 1 not.
Chatrwome-n Barnas •sked the Commission to address the tssue ~f cc~n+iercial uses causing
prablams in th~ industriat a~ea and Comn-tsstoners Bushore~ Tolar end Davld tndicoted they
5! 19/~
.-~
~~ .z- ~.
~~ ~.
MINUTES~ ANANEIM CITY PLANNiNG COMMISS ~pN~ MAY lg~ 1980 80-303
EIR NEQATIVE DECIARATION AND CONDITIONl,I US~ PERMIT N0~ 2078 (CONTINUED)
~.~,.,...~._._... -
felt automabilo repair facillttes shou 7d be located tn the tndustrlal a~ea and look nicer
In ~n enclosed buildtna.
Commi~tsloner Oavid asked if the Comr~ls~lon had not prevtously determined that cert~in uses
ar~ mora Indust~lal than commerclal.
Mr. Mir~gifa expleined he hes been In ~ mobl{e eutanoblic ~epalr busine~s, dotng most of
the work at the customer's ho~ne from ~ t~uck and now wishes to have s fixed loc~tlon. Na
stated he sarvices • smell fleet of pi ck~upa, etc. and m~st of his customers are the
~esult of '4~ord of mouth" contacts.
Respondtng to Commissioner Herbst's question, he statad approxim~+tely ;0$ af his bustness
would be to tho industrl~+l cammuntty.
Canmissloner Tolar stated he haa no p r~b18m wfth tha uae~ but was cancerned whether the
traPfiG signsl assessment fee should bo rcqulrad ond Conmisslo~e~ aushore tndlcated he did
not bel tave the Ccxnmisston has ever walvcd those f~es.
ACTION: CommisslonQr Tolar offered a m~tlon~ seconded by Conmtssloner Ktng and MOTION
~D~ thet the Anahc(m Ctty P~anning Commissian has rovtewed the proposa) to pennlt an
auta ~epeir facility in the ML (Indus lrial, Limited) Zo~a on a re~tangularly-shaped perce)
ot lsnd oonsisttng of approximatety 0_4; ecre having a meximum depth of appr~ximatoly 113
feet and being laceted approximately 370 feet north of the canterline of lincoln Avenue
and 660 faot eeat of the c4nteritnc a! Cresent WeY; and does hereby approve the Neqetive
Decle~ation from the requlrament to p lepdre an environmental impect ~eport on the basts
that there would be no sign(ftcent individual or c~Jmulative adv~rse environmenta) impact
due ta the approval of tF~is Negati~e Occlaratlon s~; ~.~ ~~P Anaheim General Plan designates
the ~ubject property for general indu~triel land uses .~~~~~~Knsurate with tha propassl; that
no sensitive environmental impacts ar e involved in th~ proposal; that che Inttlal Study
submitted by the pet~tloner Indtcates no signiflcant individual or cumulative edvarse
envtt~nmcntal impacts; and that the I~i~gativ~ Qeclaratlon substantiattng the fo~egoing
findings is on file in the City of An aheim Plenning Department.
Commisstonar Tolsr~ cffered Resotution No. PC80-82 and ~oved for its paaaage end adoptio~
that the Anahelm City Ptanniny Ccxnmisslon does her~by grant Petitio~ for Conditla~al Use
Perm(t No. 207~~ for a 3-Year period subJect to review, snd subJect to Interdepartn+antal
Committee recortrn~ndatians~ and adding o condition requiring payment of the difference
betwemn industrta) and cartme~cta+ tralftc signal ~ssessment fees.
p~ rril ca11~ the Eorego(ng resoluti on wes passed by the Following vote:
AY~S: COMa11SSIdt1ERS: BARNES~ 9USHORE~ DAVIG~ FaY~ NERBST~ KING~ TALAR
NOES : COMkI S51 ONERS : NOt~E
ABSEtIT: COMMISSIOtIERS: NONE
~/I9/80
~
MINUTES~ ANAHEIM CITY PI.ANNING COMMISSION~ MAY 19~ 19~
80- 304
ITEM N0. PUaIIC HCARIt~G. OWNERSt qCNNEA SHCET METAI~ INC. ~
~~i~~ pECLARATION 2871 Ceat le C~esta Avenue~ Anahelm~ CA 92806. AGENTs
NT CQNCR~TC GONCEPTS BIDC. CQ., INC.~ 3121 East la Palm~
N ~ . 2079 Avenue~ Aneheim, Untt "0"~ Anahelm~ CA g2806.
Petitioner roquests permtsslon TO RETAIN A CONTRACTOR'S
STORACE YARp WITl1 WAIVER OF REQUIRED ENCLOSURE Of OUT-
OOQR USES o~ property desc~tbod as e rhetangularly-shaped parcel of lend consistinq ot
•pproxlmotely 1.E~2 ecres having a f~ontage of appr~xim~tely 26N feet on the south stde of
Mlratoma Avenua~ having a mextmum depth of epproximntcly 2G~ feet end being located
approximataly q20 feet wast of the centerline of Red Gum Street~ and furthe~ described as
286~ end 28yZ Mlrolnma Avenue. Property presently classtfied RS-A-k3,0~n
(RCS I OENTI A~/AGRI CULTUML) ZO~IE.
There was no onn tndicatiny thei r presenc~ In opposttlon to sub~ect requcst, And elthough
the staFf ~epart to the PI ann i ng Comm) ss lon dAted Ma~r 19 ~ 19af1 was not read et the pub 1 t c
hearing, tt Is referred to and made ~ part of the mtnutes.
Robert Benne~~ 2730 Victc~rta D~i ve~ laguna Deach~ stated he wents to have a construction
yard ~t this locatton. He refe~rod to tnterd~partmentAl Commttte~ recommendations and
expiained thts wi il ba e temporary use far 3 to 5 yesrs and the tmprovements would be made
when the propArty Is fully dcveloped.
TIIE PUDLIC t1EARING WA; CLOSED.
Commissioner Nerbst clarlfied che petitioner will provicie cu~b~ end gut~ers for street
widening and pntnted out a sldewalk weiver c~n be requested from the Cicy Engtneer and if
athcr waivers have been g~anted in the ~rea~ tt is posstble the requcst would be granted.
Jey Titug. Office Engineer~ statcd storr~ dra(ns In the stre~ts ar~ not Anticipated and the
~tp~~rein condltton Is normt+lly recon+rnend~d as e saf~gua~d ao th~ developer will not grad~-
hls p~opr.rty so tt cirains onto che neighbar's prapertv and the City Englneer approves the
pl~ns for water dralnage.
Hr. Benner statcd there wi 11 be no ~,~radtng,
Jack Wh i te, Ass I s tan t CI ty At to ~ney ~ s tated the fees are es tab 1 f 9hed by ord T nanGe and ~ven
without the conditions~ the orclinAnce still requlres that the fees be paid.
Jay Titus statad normelly the fees are peid when there is a buildinc~~ but in this case the
fees ere sti 1 1 requi red based ar~ thc s i:a of c-;c property. He explained the requt rement
is completion wlthin 60 days rather than at the time huilding permits are o~btained.
Requlrement for slattincl of the fence was discussed and Mr. 8enner pointed out aqsln this
wlll ba e temporary use end Coer~rnlssioner 8ushore not~d other similar uses in the area have
bee~ required to provlde the slatting and Can~nlsstoner Tolar did not think thts
requireme~t hes ever been waived for thls Cype ofi activtty.
Ccx~missio~er Bushore stated the Commtssion has no problem wt th the use~ but scamme of these
requtr~nts cannet b~ watved a~d sane wi 11 take c,ere Af themsrlves when the property is
daveloped.
Chairwanan Bernes refcrred to tha glacting and Nr. ~enner stated they wtll provide the
stta screcning.
Sl1g/80
~
~ ;
,
MINUTES~ ANANEIM CITY PLM~NINQ COMMISSION~ MAY 19, 1980 80•~OS
EIR NEGATIVE DBCLARATION~ WAIV~R OF CODE REQUIREMENT AND C~NDITIONAI
USE PERMIT N0. 2079 (CONTINUED)
ACTIQ~It Commia~lon~r Kiny offdred a mott~n~ secc~nded by Commisstoner David snd MOTI0~1
~D~ thet tlie 1lnahaim Clty Plan~{ng CvrtK~istlon hes reviewad the proposal to ~etaln a
contracto r's storage yard with a walve~ of ~equlred onclosure of outdoor uses on ~
roctengularly•~theped perc~l of lend co~sisting of approxtmattly 1.82 acres; hAVing e
fronta9e of approximately 264 feet on the south side of Miralan-e Avenuo and havinq a
maximum depth of epproximotely 285 feet end batng locatad approximetely 920 feet was+t of
the cente rlina of Red Gum Street; and d~es hereby approve the Negative Oncl~ratlon fran
che requlrement to prepare an environmental (mpact ~eport on the basts that there would be
no signifitsnt Individual or cumulative adverse envtronmental tmpact due to the approval
of this Negative Declarotion since the Ansheim Generol Plan design~tes the subJect
p roperty for general lndustrlal land uses comr+~ensur~te with the propoael; that no
scnsitiva environmental Impacts ~re Involved in the prop~sel; that th~ Inltial Study
submitted by the petitio~cr tndicotcs no gigntficant indlvidual or cumulettve ~dverse
environmental tmpecta; and thet the tlegacive Uecleration substantieting the foregoing
findings la on flle In the City vf Anehei~, Planning Dapartment.
Conmissla~er King affered a motior~~ seconded by Commissla~er David end I~TION CARRIED~
th~t the AnahQlm City Planning CAmmisston does hereby deny the request far welver of Code
requlrement on the basis thnt th~ petitt~ner stipulat~d ta ~rovide the requlred stte
screening.
Commisslaner King offered ReeUlutton No. PCBA-83 end moved for Its passage end adoption
that the Annheim Cfty Planning Commisslon cbcs hereby gra~t thc Petitlon for Conditton+~)
Use Permit No. 2p79~ subJcct tn interdcportmcnt~l Committec reccxrmendattons.
On rotl call. the foregoing resolutlon wes paasnd -~y the following votet
AYES; COMMISSIQNERS: BAfltIES. BUSiIORE, DAVIO~ FRY~ NER~ST~ Y.ING~ TOLAR
I~OES : COMMI SS IONERS : NONE
ADSEIIT; COMMISSIQNEaS; t10t~E
S/19/SO
~~
;
,
MINUTES~ ANAHEIM CIT1f PLANNING COMMISSION~ MAY 19~ 1980 8A-;OG
ITEM N0. 6 PUBLIC NEARING. OWNERS: RODERT GUYOT, PAUL KOUR1~
~~1'~t,~Rl CAl EXEMPTI ON-ClASS 1 ET AL. 35~~ 4rangetho~~e Avenue, Anahetm, CA 92807•
AGENT: MARY SUE SHELTON~ 19G~+3 Monta~no lsne~ Yorba
. 2080 lind~~ cA g2b~G. Pettttoner requetts PERMISSION TO
PERMIT THE ON-SALE OF BEER AND IJINE iN A PROPOSED
RESTAURl1NT Witl~ NAIVER OF MINIMUM NUMES~R OF PARKING
SPACES on property deacribod aa an Irrogularly-~haped par•col ~f land consisting ot
app roxlmetely 2.q ac~es having a frontec~e of approximately 919 fQet an the sovth sidn of
Orengethorpe Avenue~ heving a meximum cfepth of approximately 121 feet and being located
approximataly ~45 feat east of the centa~line of Mill~~r, and further descrtbed as 3462
Ea~t Orangathorpe A~enue. Property prosently classified CL (COMHERf.IAL, LIMITEt1) 7.ONE.
Thern was no one Indlcating thelr presence in oppositton to subJect request~ and although
the staff report to the Plenntng Commission drted May 19, 1913n wes not read at the pubttc
hearing~ lt Is referred to and made a part of the minutns.
Mary Sue Shelton~ petlttoner, was present to answer nny questions.
THC PU~LI C~1EAR1 NCS WAS GLOSED.
Co+nmissioner Bushore painted out wt~en the rettasslficatlon wos eppr~ved. there was a
selpulatian th~t the subJect center w111 no[ include ua~s suct~ as rest~urants and asked
the petit(oner to ~elate to the praperty awncr that ihe Commtssion wes concerned.
It was notcd the Planntn~~ DI•ector ar his authortzcd ~eprosentative hes determined that
tha proposed pro)ect fails within the defin{tion of Categartcal Exempttans. Class 1, as
define~d in pAragrsph 2 of thc Clty of Anahein~ Environmental Impact Report Guideltnes a~d
is~ ther~efore~ categortcally exen~t from the requlremeni t~ prepare an Ela.
Commissioner King offered a motion, secondrd by Commissiotser Tolar and MOTION CAaRIED~
that the Anaheim tity Planni~y Cortu--issi~n docs hereby grant the ~equ~st for wa(ver of Code
rsqulrement on th~ b asis of the unusual ,hapc~ of subJect property and on the bt+s(s that
the req uesC ts minimal.
Canmissioner Kiny offered Rnsolutton No. PC80-8b snd naved for its passage and adoption
that the Anaheim City Planning Commission cioes hereby grant Petttlon for Conditional Use
Permlt t~o. 2~J8Q, subJect to Interdapartmental Committee recamn+endations.
0~ roll call, the foregofng resolutton wes passed by the folloatng votc:
AYES: COHMISSIOt1ER5: BARNES~ BUStiORE, DAVIO~ FRY~ HERdST, KiNG~ TOLAR
NQES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMNISSIONEaS: NONE
5/tg/8o
~~
)
MiHUTES~ ANAliE1M CITY PLANNIIJG COMMISSION~ MAY lg~ 1980 80•gp~
(TEM N0. PUBLIC HEARING. ONNF.RS: Nl3J ASSOCIATES~ ~W26 z2nd.
R N VE DECLAMTION Strest~ Newport Deach. CA ~26G0. AGEfJT: HARVEY W.
~ L M 0. 2081 WOLFE~ 1141 North Cosby Way~ Suite "L"~ A~ahelm~ CA
92806. Petttloner requests permtssion to aETA1N AN
EXTERMINATIt~G SERVIC~ on pruperty descrtbed ss a
~ecte~gula~lyshaped parcel af land conslstlnq of approximately 1.~~ acres havtng a
frontage of ~spprox(mately ~12 feet on the wast sic7e of Cosby WaY~ h~ving s msxtmum depth
of spproximately 346 feet and betng located approximately 2G3 feet north of the centerline
of La Paimai Avenua~ and further described es il-~0 North Cosby Way (Tota) Exterminating).
Property presently classffted ML (INOUSTRIAL~ LIMITED) ZONE.
Thsre was no one Ind(catfny their pr~sance in o~positlon to subJect request~ and although
the staff report to the Pla~ning Comnlsslon datcd May 1~~ 19a0 was not read et tho public
hearing~ (t 1~ refcrrcd to end made a part of the minutes.
Narvey Wolfc, potitionar~ wes pr~sent to answer any qucstlons.
TIIE PUEILIC HEARING WAS CLOSED.
Mr. Nolfe explained his Customcrs do not comc to hts placc of buslncss.
ACTION: Commissloncr King offered a mocion~ seconded by Commtssloner Tolar and MQTION
~tR~fD~ tl~at the Anaheim Clty Planning Cammission F~as revlewed the proposal to rataln an
axlsting e xterminating servico on a recxangulorly-shaped parcel r~f land consisting of
approximately 2.1~ acres~ haaing a frontaqc of approximataly 312 feet nn the west stde of
Cosby Wey~ having a maximum depth of ap~rnxirr~tcly 34{~ and belnc~ located approxtmately 263
feet north of thc cenccrlinc of La Pelma Avcnue; end does hereby app rovc the Negative
Declaratton from the ~equirement to prepare on environmental ImpacC report on the basis
that there would be na slgntficanc indivldual or cumulative adverae environmental Impact
due to the approva) of this Negative Deciaratlon since the Anaheim General Plan designates
the subJect p~aperty for general industrit~l tand usas commensurete with the proposal; that
no sensittve Environmental impacts are involved in the proposal; that the Initlal Study
submitted by the petitioner i~dicates no s(yniflcant tndividual or cumulative adverse
envtronmental (mpacts; ana that the 1~egative Declaration substantiating the foreqoing
findings is on file In the City of A~aheim Planniny Departrnent.
rommtssioncr King offered Resolution No. PC6~-85 and moved for its pas~age and adoptton
that the Anahcim Cizy Planning Commission daes hereby grant Petitto~ for Cor+ditiona) Use
Permit No. 2Q81~ subJect to Intcrdepartmental Committee racommendations.
On roll call, the fpregoing resolution was passc~ by the following vote:
AYES : COMMI SS I ONERS : E3ARt~E5, BUSifORE ~ DAV l D, FRY ~ NEREiST ~ KI NC, TOLAR
NaES: COMMISSIONCRS: NONE
ABSENT; COMMI SS I ONERS : NOIJE
5/ 19/80
~ ~. .~ ~ ~ ' ;~~
MINUTES~ ANANEIM CITY PLANNING COMNISSION~ MAY 19~ 1980 80•30s
ITEM NQ. 8 PU9LIC HEARING. OWNERS: SAV•ON REALTY~ INC.~
~~Tt'1;`~RICAL EXEMPTIO~~-CLASS 1y40 South An~helm Doulevarci~ Anahelm~ CA 928A5.
1~A CE NQ. 3 Petitlorter requeats WAIVER QF MAXIMUM FENCE HEIGNT TO
""~"-'"""'i""" CO~~STRUCT A FENCE on property descrlbed as an
. trragularly-shaped parcel of tand consisting of
approximr,tcly 18.6 acres located at the a~utheast corner of Cerrftos Ave~ua and Anehalm
8ouleverd~ having a front~ge Af approximately 1?.50 f~et on the south side af Cerrttos
Ave~ue and a frontege of approxtmately ;00 fcct on the east side of flnahelm Boulevard~ and
further described a~ f~00 South Anaheim Douleverd. Property presently classifled ss ML
(INOUSTRIAL. LIMITED) ZONE.
Tho~e w as no one indlceting thelr ~resence in oppositlo~ to subJect request~ end elthough
the staff report to thn Pianning Cortmission dateci Mey 19~ 1980 was not reAd a~ the public
hearing. it is refcrrecl to and made a part of the minutes.
Joseph Byrne~ 1500 South Aneh~im Boulcv~rd. stated this request for walver of the fe~ce
height along Corrltos ts for securtty purposes; tl~at they have no contro) substances
d(stributcd~ but that (s not gcnerally known and there Is +~ problem wtth break-ins. f1e
stated they havc no objection to any of the reca~unendAtlons.
THE PUBLIC NEARING WAS CLOSEU.
Commissioner Herbst asked tf che trees end screening shown wiit be provideci snd Mr. Dyrne
replied they would and that is onc of the conditions.
Commissioner Kin9 polntec~ o~t another security fence in the Area 14 feet high~ and asked
tf the pctitfoner would be wtlltng to have the fence 14 feet to be wnsistent and Mr.
Byrno explained that the 1y feet i~: Che stand~rd helght and he did not know if li~-feet
would cr~ate a problem. Ile explained ihe highest portlon of the gate oparetes by a pulley
to provide trafftc control.
Commisstone~ 1~erbst was concerned that tf~e fence has not been properly engineered since
any fence higher than G fect hes to be st~uctu~ally design~d and he did not think it would
pass tnspectton~ and Mr. By~ne sttpuleted the fence will conform to all Code requirements.
It was noted the ?lanning Director or lils authorized representative has determl~ed that
the proposed project fails within tha definition of Categorical Exemptions. Class 3, as
defined in parayraph 2 of the City of Anaheim Environmental impact Report Guideltnes and
is~ therefore, cetegorically exempt from the requlrement to prepare an EIR.
Cammisstoncr King offered Resal~tian No. PCBO-8G and moved for its passage and adoption
that the Anahein City Planning Commisstnn does hereby grant the Petition for Variance No.
;1~-8 on ths b asts that strict application of the Zoning Code deprtves the ~rope~ty of
privileges enjoyed by oXher property under identical zoning classification in the
vicinity~ and sub)ect to Interdepartmental ConKnittee recommendattons.
On rotl call~ the foregoing resolutton was passed by the fol~owing vote:
AYES: CONMISSIOtiERS: BARNES, ESUSII~RE~ DAVID~ FRY, HERBST~ KING~ TOLAR
NOE5 : COHMI SS IOIiERS : N~N£
ABSENT: COMMISSlOt~ERS: NONE
5/19/80
~r
MI NUTES ~ ANANE i N C I TY PLANN I NG COMMI SS I ON ~ MAY 19 ~ 19f10 8~' 3~9
IfEM N0.
~ ' I~D RC:OhWENDl1TIONS
Tha following Repurts and Reconwncndattons steff reports were presented but not read:
A. VAal11NCE t10. 1 11+ - Requast fnr approval nf specific use from BA~ry Manthe~ for a
stu'~Tci ~~"or t~e nstructlon of chnss oncl beckgemmon at ~~01 West Katel la Avenue~ NC
(Ten Doiler "H" Nour Studio).
SubJect petlttan wes contlnued from the me~eting of May ;~ 1930.
John pawson, attorney~ 1iC~50 Von Karman~ Newport Beech, askcd if there ore any
changcs in ttie staff report and Deen Sherer~ ~ssitant Planner~ explalned the only
clianye Is en additl~n of the paregraph pertnining to the contlnuance.
Mr. Dawso~ contlnued that the request is for a backqAmmon and chess instructton
business to be includeJ in Variance tfo. 131~+. Ne referred to the Poltce
Dcpartn~cnt repo~t and did not tt~ink thesn arc problems the Planning Commission
si~ould be cuncerne~ abaut end tt~ey shuuld only constder tl~e xoning; that the
application was far the teacf~ing enci pl~~ying of backg~mnwn rn~ chass end there is
a ch<~rge of S1G.0~ an hour; that in 19;~ Dean She~er approveJ an operatton for
backgom~on end chess at this locatio~; tt~at the problem now is the passing of
Ordina~ce t~o. ~~~7 which relates to the business regutAttons of d~nce studios and
socipl studios and thls use ls to ~c considered one; hc~wever, Qrdinance No. 497
deals wlth business regulatlons anJ not zoning and under the headtng af
"clefinitions"~ s~cial s~udios is (ncluded and alsa ciam~c instructlon for fees
which fits this use precisely. Ordinance ~lo. 4079 which add§ Ct~apter 18.87 of the
Code deals wlth adult entertnlnment business wt~lch is a zoning matter and any
dance studio~ pt~ocoqrapf~lc or modeliny studlo~ or sc~cial club whose clie~tele is
comp~sed solely of persons over 1~ year5 old fall into that c~tegory and an adult
business requires a conditional use permit; hawever~ a revtew of such a permit as
set. forth tn Section 1b.47.030.020 states you mey have r~ canditlon~l use permlt
for adult entcrtainment bus(ness. except when tt is wittiin y00 fcet of a lot
zoned for residentiai use, ond subJcct property is a residential lot; and except
within 1000 feet af a church or educationa) institution end also he thought lt is
wtthin 100~1 fcct of another ~dult entcrtainment facillty. Ne referred to the
non-conforming provision to conform within onc year. pointing out they have until
t~ovembcr 20, 1980 to conform or discontinue and stated it wi11 be impossible for
them to confo rm under this ordinance and will discontinue on November 20~ 1980.
He commented that the Policc report indicat~s there has been prostitution, etc.
going an at this facility~ and he believed that is the conce~n of the V9ce Squad
af the Palice Department ra[her than the Planning Commission. Ne felt this use
comcs under tF~e zoniny for adult business and that they have unti) November 20th
to comply. t~e stated the new Ordinance requires applytng to the Police
Department fnr a pe~mit and his clie~~t, against his advlce~ applted for e permit.
Ne dtd not think his client cauld at+ply for a permit to operate a busir,ess that
is not properly zoned.
Comm(ssioner aushore stated thc Commission should determinc whPther or not this
ig a permitted usu.
Nr. Uawson stated the Commisslon has th~ option of cither seying this use is
included as a prop~r use ~nder Vartance No. 131~-, but he did not see how the use
would fit within eny of those uses.
5/~9/~
~
MINUTES, ANANEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION~ MII1Y 19~ 19~
REPORTS ANO RECOMMENDATIONS (CONTINUED)
80-;1p
Commisatoner Bu=hore stated ov~rything ha has haard todey and the fact that tho
nsme is now "14 pallar An Hou~" indlcatas the us~ Is not for backgemmo~ and a
condttlonai use pe nnit is required.
Mr. O~w~on ~tated it la still a plnco for the pl~ying of backgammon and chesa~
but It also fells within the category nf adult ente~tminment and in his opinlon
wouid havo to have e conditlonal use pe nnit. I~e stated it was recammended by the
Planning Dapartnwnt thet the first step would be t~ see If it could be app roved
as a proper usc under Vartancc No. 131-~.
Commisstoner tlust~or~ Askcd if the petitionar would be wtlllny to take off the S10
An Hour and call it a backgnmmon and chnss playing establtshment with na agc
r~strictlans where he could take his family.
Nr. Qawson explalnad there is no age rostrictlon an this operation.
Commissioner Bushorc fett a conditlonal u,e pe rn-tt Is required on the basis of
thc testimony.
Jack Whlte~ Assistant City Attorney~ stated the motlon should be the
determinetlon as to whether or not the partlc~lar use as outlined ts similar to
the uses permitted under Variance Na. 1314~ and if the ap~ltct+nt choses to apply
for a conditlonal use permtt he has that Prerogative.
Commissfoner Herbsc state~ orlginalty Va~~t+nc~ Na. 1314 tncluded a"studio" and
r~lated permltted uses and in 197G a"dance studi~" was denteci and h~ felt the
word "studio" is being misused. Ne did not think (t can be approved as a
perml kted use.
Commissioner Bushore clarified that the petitioner wants a determinatton that
thfs is nat a permitted usc~ in order to apply for a condltional use permit.
Commissioner Ktny asked lf the petitioner would withdraw his appitcatlon for a
permft for a sottsl club with the petitioner indicating he wauid.
ACT10!!: Commissloner Nerbst offered a motlon, seconded by Cam-issioner David and
~bN CARRIED~ that the Anaheim Ctty Pla~+ning Corm~tsston does hereby find that a
backgarm~on and chess instructlon facillty does not c~onform to the uses pe~itted
by Varlance No. 131b.
Cortxnissta~er Qushore asked why the petttioner is being asked to withdraw h1s
request for a social ~armit and Jack Whit~ explained that is not within the
Commisslon's jurisdtction.
S/19/80
~
MINUTES~ AFUIHEIM CITY PLANNiNG COMMISSIDN, MAY 19~ 1980 80•311
REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (CONTINUEO)
8. RECLASSIFICATION_N0. 77•78•5~ ' Re4uest for approval of extension af tin+e~ from
Ro nrt ac:~ n ~rder to nait~c zoning on p roperty locat~d et 1000 North lomita
Strcet.
ACTION: Commissioner King offercd o motion~ secronded by Commisslaner Davld and
MO ON CARRIED~ th~t thc Anohcim Clty Planniny Commissi~n does hereby grent the
~ec~uost for an extcnslon of tinx; to explre on 11pri1 24. 14R1~ for
Reciessiflcatic,n ~lo. 77~74-aG•
C. Al~l1l~pOtlHCt~T I~Q. 19-i~~A ' Req~est from Nals M. Ostrem to abendon a portion of an
ex stl~ny ~na en p c utllity and slope easeme~t located t~t the aast side of
Tustln ~vcnue from 50~ feet to Gly fc~t~ morc or less, s~uth of the Rtvorside
FreGway .
ACTIQII: Commisslancr Y.ing offered a motion~ saconded by Commisston~r Davtd and
MO' TION C11RftIED~ that Che Anah~im Clty Planning ~ommissio~~ does hereby ~ecc~mmend
Lo the Ci ty Councl 1 that Abandonment tlo. 19' 1~+~ h~ epprove-a es r~cortmended by the
Ctty Cnglneer.
0. CONOITIOt111L U5E PERMIT N0. iG23 ' Requcst for an extenslon of tlmc from uoodrow
J. McC ure~ 4r prope~ty oceted ~~ the southwesterly side of Nowell Street and
northwesterly of the centerl~~c of Katella Avenue.
ACTIO~It Commtssioner Kfng offered ~ r~ation~ secondad by Commissioner Oavid and
NOT ON CARRIEp~ tt~at tho Anahclrti City Plonning C~armission does hercby 9r~nt the
request for an extension of tlrr~ to expire on M+~y 24' 19n2~ for Condition~l Use
Pcrmi t No. 1623.
07HER ACTIANS:
Commtssioner H~erbst offcred a motton~ s~c~nded by Commission~r DAVtd and MOTIOH CARRIEO~
that the Anaheim City Pianning Gonnisslon does hereby rccammend to the Ctty Council that
any publtc b~llding plans praposed tsuch as libr~rles) be submltted to the Plmnning
Commissior, fvr their review ~nd com~entA~ similar to the pracedures followed by general
lew citias.
ADJOURNMENT SeG~ ~~~by ~~isslonebufrY~and MOTIONSGARRIEdetlrat~thermeetl gtben,
adjourned.
The ~neeting was adJourned at 2:;0 p.m.
Respcttfully submitted~
~~ A' /'~~~f'M
Edlth L. Hsrris~ Secretary
Anaheim City Planntng Comnission
ELli:lm
.
S ~
, / 19J°
_ ~
,: ..M_ . . ,...: .__ ,..... .~
. .....,_.. r.. .
~7a"y ~M ~"Y 1 Pv .'~ ~' ~r~~ I ~ C e ~ i r` t_ _{ y ! ~ ` ~ ~~h ~Y~ ~~:?!
r yi~i
, ~.; il . . ' :4i
~Z
..1 ~ ~ . ~ . . ~ . . ~ _
~~~,}' , - ' . . .
~ .. . . -. . . . . ~ ' ~ .. ' ~ .. . . ~ 1:
.., . . . . . . . . . . ...~. .~.. ~~ . .~~-:,
~ ' . ..".. . ...- . . . ~ . . ~ ,.-1.
~':~ .' . .. . . . ' . . . . ~ . .. . ~ . . .. ._1l
~ . , . . . ~ ' ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ . . ~~ .9:
~:'. '.. ,, , . . , .' . - ~. .. . ... . .. . . ; ~., .. ~~.. '~~i
, .. . . , . . . . ~ . .. . .. __µ.
x . . ' . . . ' . . , . . .
;: - . . ' , . , .. - . ~ . . . iJ..
.
~
~ '
,
.
!
~ ,
, "
~ ~': y~ ~~~ ~~. '. ~ : ' ~~~ ~ ~ ' . ... ~ . ~~
. .. ~.. . _ ., ~. . . . _
~. .. ~ . . ,~ . . '~
.: . . . _ _ . _ ~ . ... . .. . . . „ . .
~ ., ~. . ~.~ . . :.
p , . .... . . ~. .. ... .. :.. ... ...
.. ,.
.
. . . ., . ~ '~.~,
•- ~;.'. , ....,- :~: .. -:~..-. ..~,~ . . . . ., .~;' . .
_'.Y~ k ..'f ' s :. ! ~~~ '~. .~: _ ~ ~ _ ,J
.t yi . ; ~ ' dny: '~f .
'
7 '. v i i ' ~~~ :' ~y
Y ~ 1{ ~. ~ _ ~ t c ~' f i
( CLi9. f~ { rM e ~ . 1 ~.. ! ~~ ~ 4 ~s ~ i~~C+j ~t.t~' 15sf.
i}~ 4 a. s {2~ r J~ ~ ~. ~ . ~: i ~ +~ ~ ~ ^+ t r ~ r
r } 7 h t p ~ ; ~ ('~
,
~f-~'~ri~ ~ ~,~~~~ fb'P~f1.~~+.4~1tA 1 . 7. ~ ~ ~~ t i fy~ i~ ~ 1'v ,~, ~ x ,j~ ~ z ~ ~ ~ j ~~
+~ ~, ''~rh.'. ~~., ~' ~ t: r< k ~ r ~ ~ i~ t r t~4r 4a ~ 7~~ < ~'
~:~Sa'~~, 6'. , 3 {~"K4j tf .y'. „ . , . - `~ -. -~ . ~~~ r ~ ; '~ ._. ,.,.~ r' '~' ~ ~' ~~~ ~~f~. ,} ~ j"~
>~... t •-. >_ Y M l `' ...- .~.~ ,.~F ~ ~/.., ~.., t~ +.Y~, ~,+n 1 y~ :.rt ~A
~'~d~`~~u~d~~~~i.?.~~ rY~.~ .+'11 tv.,i_Ge4',a~. .t..:, ...,_ ..y n N~K~~ s~qt.t~ ~'. x.~'.i..';~ w~'.~.:s !~'+~~..~:'._ _f1~S~Ct.:~c~.,~~.~..:'.r.~y F~~?..'!`:~~1t~~ ~.~~~3~~, .
.. ~~. >rii c P. 2