Minutes-PC 1980/09/22. Civtt Canttr ; ~
Anahsl~, Ca~if~ .ia
~ S~pt~mber 22~ 1980
REGULAR MEEtiNG OF THE ANAIIEIM CITY PLANNItiG COMMISSlOt1
".EGUL.AA - The rogu 1 er nwat i ng of the Anahe i m C 1 mY ~ P~ep tember2 2 i S~ 980 ~^s ~he„ed
NEETING to order bti• Chairman Tolar at 1:~5 P•
Council Chamb~~, a q~.iorum being present.
PRESENT - Ghairman: To1ar
Commissioners: ~arnes, Bouas. Bush~re~ Fry~ Herbst, K.inq
ABSENT - COMMISSIONEFS: NONE
AL50 PRESENT - F~ank Gowry
Jack WhiCe
Jay Titus
Annika Santalahti
Oean Sherer
Edith Harris
5nnior Assistant City Attorney
Assistant City rttorney
Offica Engineer
ASSistant Di*ector for Zoni~g
Assistant Planner
plann(ng Commiss~on Secretary
P~EDGE OF - The i'lydge of Allegiance to the Flag was ted by Gommissioner King.
ALLEGIANCE
APPROVA~ QF - Commission~r King offered a motion. seconded by Cortmissioner Herbst
THE MINUTES and MOTION CARRIED rChairman 7olar abstaining on the August 25~ 1980
minutes) that the min~~tes of the meetings ~f August 15 and September 3,
1980 be approved as submicted.
C~NTINUED ITEM:
ITEM N0. 2 PUBLIC HEARINf,. OWNERS: TEXACO-ANAHEIM HillS, INC.~
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT aE~ORT N0. 236 380 Anaheirn Hills Road, Anaheim, CA 9280%• AGENT:
INC. 38~ Anaheim Hills
~ECLAS IFICATION N0. 0- ~-9 ERIK BERG, ANAHEIM HlLLS~ Pro erty described as an
TENTATIVE MAP 0~ TRACT Na. 10996 ~oad, ~naheim, CA 9280J. P
T NTATIVE MAP OF TRACT N0. 109 irregularly-sha~~d parcel of land consisting of
ENTATIV MAP OF TRACT N0. ~099 approximately 7g•0 atres at the southwest corner
REQUES FOR REMQVAL OF SPECIMEN TREES of AveniQa de Sa~tiago and~Eeddon ~heYsouthas;de
---- -------- ha v i ~g a f ron t ag e o f 2 37 5
of Avenida de Santiago and a frontage of 220 feet
on the west side of Hidde~_~a"YNICRCORaIDO~~OVERLAY)CZJNE,y c~~ssified RS-A-43~OQ0(SC~
(RESIDENTIAL/AGRICULTURA~ SCE
RECLASSIFICATION ftEQUE57: P~aTION B- RS-A-43~000(SC) TO RS-HS-43,000(5C)
TRACT iiEQUE5T5: 22 RSTHSL22H~00(SC)TLOTSNAN07 "~G OF:
14 RS-HS-43~000(SC) lOTS.
TREE REMOVAL REQUEST: TO REMOVE 6 SPECIMEN TR.EES.
Subject petitinn was continued from the meeting of Septe~nber 9~ 19~0 at the request of
the petitioner. tt was noted chat the petitioner has reouested a two-week continuance
to the mecting Qf Ocxobar 6, 1980•
ACTiON: Cortmissioner King offered a motion~ seconded by Cumm~ssioner Bouas, Z~nd M~T'!G~!
CA R~D~ that considerati4n of the afor~rnentianed item be ~on[inued to the r~gular{y-
schedule~ mceting of O~tobnr 6~ 1980~ at the request of the petitioner.
9/22/80
80 -545
~
r
1!i NUTES. ANANE I M C 1 TY PUNN i NG C~?IMI SS t ON ~ SEPTEMaER ZZ ~ 1980 80• 5ab
I TEh NO. i ~tldL 1 C HEARI NG. 011N~1S t ~.Altlll/ R. ANO JU01 TH I.
~~'~~~~RICAL EXEMPTION-CLASS 1 SMITH, 1704b Ma~in~ day O~Ivs~ Huntin9ton Beach~ CA
. 92649. ACENT: GEORGE ANp MiLL1AM NICHOIS~ 573~
Edw~~d W~~a CI~c1~~ fii~~~ arove~ CA 9t6M5. P~titio~~r .
~~qw~t• pen~lsslon TO PEItMIT A ~Udlit DANCE HAII IN
TNE C~ ZQNE on property described ~s an ir~~9ul~rly-sh~ped p~rwl of land contisttnq ot ;
i i ~
f
e~
approxinrt~ly 1.6 acra on prop~~ty locatsd ~o~th and west of the northwest corn~r o
11
Id
f d
h
lbad and Knott Streec~ having approxiaute tront~p~• of 20 a
~ o
•
t~st o~ th• nort
'
Ib~d and 17Q f~et on tha west side of Knott Strs~t~ h~ving ;
a maxl~uM dapth of
approximately 39~ fAOt~ and furthor ~escribad a• 919 South Knott Str~et. Prope~tY ~
pnsNntly ciessified CL (COMMERCIAL~ LIMITEQ~ tONE. ~
SubJeCt petitlo~ was continued from the meeting of Auyutt ~
25. :980 ~t the r~qwst of tha ~
p~titio~er. ;
Th~re wa no one indlcattng their presence In opposition to subJsct ~equast. snd althou9h
the stsff report to the Pl+~nning Commtssior- d~ted Septe~nher 22. 1980 was not ~ead •t th•
public hearin9, it ls referrad to and mada a pa~t of the mtnutes.
Gsorgm Nichols~ petttioner~ statad this appltcatton Is for a pubiic dance hall parmit at
919 5outh Knott Avenua; that the City Attorney Info~med ths~ et the previous meatinp that
by restricting their patro~s to 21 y~ers and older~ thay would be governed by th• adult
antertainment ordinance; that he h~s a copy of that o~dinance and there is a qusst{on as
to tts appll ubiltty ta their permtt and the zonin9 statf intnrmed him th~t this quastic~
would be clarified today.
Mr. Nichols explalnad the p roposed hours of operation are f~on~ 12s0~ noon until 2:00 a.i~.~
~nd stated tha hours from iwon to 6:Q0 p.m. ars flexible ~nd ther aould not obJect co
op~ning late~ in the sfte rnoon; and thac live entertatna+ent ~nd danctng would be fran 9:00
p.m. to 1:30 a.m. and the entertsinme~t c~nsists aolely ot bands and theY ~+ould hava a
~ove~ charge and would not serve food.
THE PUBLiC HEARING WAS CIQSED.
The Commisston was ccx~cerned about the adJacant property a+ner who had expressed concern
ragarding p~rking o~ their service station p~operty at the prevlous rnaettng.
Mr. Nichols explatned he had telked with the servtce statto~ oper~tor and he indlcated the
owners v+ere planning to sel l the propertY. He ats~ explatned that he wi I1 be on duty at
the door of thi: establishmm~t ~nd wili be able ta see if i~yo~a pa~ks at the aervice
statio~ and ~rould ssk thsrn to ~aove.
Jack Ifitte. Asststant City Attorney~ explat~ed the problem la with the adult ent~rtatn~ant
ofdinance in that as long as a fee is charged fo• adn~tssio~~ and the sge ot pat~ons ta
rest~icte~d to those over 18. tha use is considered adult a~tertain+Mnt a~d nwst be louted
50U feat fran any residentlally =oned prope~ty.
Coaimtssloner Busho~a recalled that at the pravlous aieeting the Con~ission ssked the
petitioner to meet with staff to dete naine if the use coula be brought into conforaMnce
with the Cade~ a~eybe by not charging a~ admissian fne.
Jack I~Ihita explained if no fee is chs~ged~ then thers vrould ba no confltct wtth the toda
sed Mr. Nichols stated he would stipulate to not charga an edwisaton fee.
9IZ2/8~
~
,
M11i11TES~ MW~t IM GI'IY PLANIIIMa GNNMIS~INN~ St!'1'l19rEK 'LL~ lyllU dQ•yp~
Elll CATEOORICAL EXEM~TION-CLASS 1 AND CONDITIONAL USE ~ERMIT NA. 210q (CONTINUEO)
R~spondin~ to Cona~it~siona~ ~.n hor~~ Mr. Ntchols explaln~d he and hl• b rother h~v~ b~~
oparating thi• businest forapproxi~t~ly 3•1/2 ~ehs and hav~ had no probl~. H~ rad
the follorring fron~ Ordinance No. W079; S~ction 9:
"1. Any business which Is conducted exctu~ivaly for the patron~g~ of adults ~nd
to which ~Inors ~ra spscifiu ily excluded from patronaqe ther~at elther by 1aw o~
by the oper~tar of such bw tnRS:es~ sxcept ~ny bu=tne:s 11c~nsed by the St~t•
D~partaynt of Alcohoiic B~vsr~9e Controt."
Mr. Nichols falt this usa would be axcluded.
Jack White explained the po~tlon of the businesa that is the service of alcoholic
beve~apas~ cleerly is not w(thin the Ordinanca and the patitloner esn co~tinw to oparate
the ba~. The petitl~ner Is requasting a dance ha11 permit and that is ~ disttnct and
sspa~ate busineaa from the bar operatlon and is rat Iiconsed by the Alcoholic B~verage
Control Board.
Mr. White axplained the~e are two vrays to cure the p~oblem: 1.) noc to tfiarge an
sdmissio~ or cover fee and 2.) not to Iimit the age of the p~trans ~vhich wo~ld viotate the
ABC roqui~ements uninsa the d~ncinq and bar facilltlQS ~re somehow separat~d.
Ch~trman Tolar clarttled that there ls dencing at this establl:hment at the prese~t tiaAa
and thst the raataurent portion has been eltmtnated. He persanally h~d no obJectlon to a~
admitsion fee being chargAd.
CoRralsstoner Barnea stated the Ordinanca prohtbita the C~ntssion g~enttng s condittonat
w e permit a~d Commissione~ gushore explat~ed the pctitioner did not buy what he thought
he bought and that was e dance hal) whtch serves alcohollc bevera9es and ts nav ft~di~g
out that he car~not co~tinue what ha has bee~ doi~g and the Caaailssion ts limited (n ~ihat
action they can take.
Jack lihlL~ atated stnca the petittoner stipulated to no cha~ge adnilsslon, the Co~t~sion
can act o~ the request because in order tA be con~id~~sd an •dult enterta~rn~ent businass
the epa~~tor must charge a~ admission a~d limtt patrons to those over 18 snd if the
~dmission is no' r.harged, chen the bustness technically ts not an sdult entsrtain~ent
business.
Mr. Mhite also expl~ined the Coamission has the right ta rev~oke a~y pern~tt if the use
becoaMes datrimentai to ~ho pubilc'sge~eral health~ safetY or weifsre.
Conmtaslone~ 6arnes wa~tad the petitioner to knaw she ts conurn~d about the use cr~tiRg
a parkin4 problem for the adJacent service ststion.
It was noted the Pian~in9 Directo~ o~ hls authortzed representatlve h.N, determtned that
the proposed project fa11s wtthin the definttion af C~tegorlcsl Exe+aptions~ Class 1~ as
defined In psragraph 2 of the Clt~; of Mahein~ Environ~aental Onipact Repo~t Gutdeli~es and
{s, therefo~e~ categortcslly exan~pt fran the require~ent to pr~pare a~ EiR.
ACTION: Conwi:stoner Barnes offe~ed Resolution Np. -C80-157 a~d awved ~or tts passags ~nd
a~ ptTon that tha M aheim Ctty Planning Co~~tsslon does he n~by grant ~etltion for
Co~dltionat Use Permit No. 210~~ for a pe~tod of one year~ subJect to revta- far possible
exta~=ions of tima and subJect to the petitioner's sttpulstlon that no sdwlsslo~ ar oov~er
charge wt11 be meda and s~bjact to Interdepartms~tsl Ca~ntttee rocomNe~dations.
9/22/80
~
MINUTES~ AtlAHEIM CITIt PLAHNING COMMISSION~ SEPTEMBER 22. 1980 $0-548
EIR CATEGORICAL EXEMPTiON-CLASS 1 ANO CONQITiONAL USE PE Rl11T N0. ~104 (CONYINUED)
- ~._ _._.._._.. _.~....._.
On ro11 cell~ the fo~egoln9 resolutlon was passed by th• tollowing vote:
AYESs COMMISSIONERS: BARNES~ BOUAS~ BUSHOItC~ FRY~ HER 6ST~ KING~ TOtAR
NOESs COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENTt COMMISSIONERS: NONE
Jack whits~ Assistant City Attorney~ left the meetlnq at 1~40 p.m~ ~nd Frank Law ry~ Senior
City Atta~ney,~ss~m~ed his chal r.
Commtssio~ar BernQS lett the meettng •t 1t40 p.m.
ITEM N0. PUBLIC HEARING. O~INERS= BERNICE WALTZ, 25Z6 Wett
~NE VE OECLARATION Clearbrook Lene, Aneheim~ CA g2804 ANO RUTH J.
I D U EM NTS ENGLISN~ 2520 West Claarbrook Lane~ M ahelm~ CA 92804.
. 210b Pati tioner requests pe~nission TO AETAIN ~MIO
AVIARIES IN THE RS -]200 ZONE WiTN WAIVER Of
REQUIRED SETBACK FOR BIRDS on p~opertlas de~crtbed
a' rectanyula~ly-shaped parcels of land consisting of ap p roximately 0.;6 acre~ havtng •
front~9e of approximately 14W feet on thc sauth sida of C learbre~ok L~ne~ having a maximum
depth of approximately 110 f~at, and bet~g located epproximately 140 fpet eeft of the
centerltne of V~lare Street~ and furcher descrtbed ~s 2S 20 and 2526 Weat ~lear~rook Lane.
Propartlas presently clssaified RS-7200 (RESIDENTIAL~ SiN CLE•FAMILY) ZONES.
There waa no o~e tndicattng thetr presence tn oppositton to subJect request~ and although
the st~ff raport ta the Planning CommOssion deted SeptemDer 22, 19El0 wa~ not read at the
publlc hmaring~ It is r~ferr~d to and made A part of the n~lnutea.
Ruth E~glish, patitioner~ stated she end Nrs.
currently have as o hobby; thst they both have
birds is therapeutic fo~ them.
Waltz w~nt to ba able to keep the birds they
medtcsi p~oblems and actively keeping the
TNE PUBLIC NEARING WAS CLOSED.
Chatrm~n Tolar asked if eny of chese birds are sold end M rs. Engltsh replted t~at the
blyds do support tF~emselvc•z and ahe does sell them to the Magnoila Bird Farm where she
buys suppllas. but does not selt o~ the premises.
Mr:. Engltsh responded to Commissianer Bushore snd explat red both she and Mrs. Vd~itz hava
had cancer end still hs~re problems end wo~king wtth the b trds ts 'ot better than taktng
• tranquitizer. 5he expiainad she had ssked all her neig~bors fo~ a letter l~dtcatiny
whetha~ o~ not they fe 1 t the b 1 rda ~f f~+ct the t r property vei ues end the prope~ty avnen an
Keys Lane. dl ~eccly in the rear, submtttad a peti tion 1nd lcating they support tha ~equest;
that atx peaple aigned the petitton •ubmitted far the pe neit supporting the request and
~ix lette~s aere submtttad in support f~om surrounding ho~neowners.
Comnlssioner 8usho~e stated simllar per~ntts h~ve been granted in the pa~t~ espaclally
when the hobby was for relaxacion or therepy.
The nature of the complatnt ~-as b~tefiy dlacussed ond a letter wes submitted ~r~tten by a
~el9hbor wha had overheard aomments made by the person who filad the wmplatnt.
g/22l80
~
MINUTES~ ANAHEIM CITV PLANNIN6 CGMMISSION, SEPTEMBEII 22~ 1980 80~549
EIR NEGATIVE DECLAMTION~ MAIVER Of CODE REQUIREMENT ANO
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 2106 (CONTINUED)
Mrt. E~~li~h explainad thay have nevar had ~ oomplalnt and hav~ had birds for ten ysars.
ACTION: Comnisstuner Bu~ho re ofte~ed a motlon~ saconded by Commisatoher King end MOTION
~RT~~ (Commissio~er 6~rnes peing ab~ent)~ that th~ Anaheim City Planrin~ Commtsslon h~s
reviewed tha prapossl to ret ain two aviarles tn the RS-7200 (Restdentiel~ Single•Famlly)
Zo~e with walvar of required setback for bird coops on two ractangula~lysF~~ped psrcals of
lend consisting of approximately .36 acres~ hsving a front~ge of epproxim~ately 144 feet on
the south side of Cie~rbrook lane. h~ving a meximum depth of ~pproximately 11Q feet and
being locsted app~oxinrt~ly 140 feat east of the centerline of Velare Straet; and doas
hereby app~ove the Negative S~cla ~ation f~om the requtr~ment to prepare sn envtronmsnta)
lmpact report on the basis th at there would ba no atgnificant tndivldual a~ cumutativs
adve~se onvlronrro ntal impact due to the approval of this Negative Oeclarstton since tha
A~aheim Genaral P1an designs tes the subJect property for low-de~sity resid.~ntia) land uses
commensu~ate with the propos ~1; that no sensitive environmental imp~cts arr involved in
the propasal; that the Initial Study ~ubmtteed by tha petttioner tndicata: no signtficant
individua) or cumulativ~e sdverse environrtiant~l impacts; and that the Negstive Declaratton
substantiating the fo regoin g ffndings ta on file in the City of Mahelm Pls~ntng
Dopertment.
Commisstoner Bushore offere d a motlon~ secanded by Commissioner Fry snd MOTION CARRIED
(Commiaslone~ 6arnes being absent) ~ that the Anaheim Ci ty Planning Canmisslo:~ doas hareby
grant waiver of Code raqui rement of requt red satb~ck for bi rd coops on the b~sts that the
coops heve been in axistence for approximetely ten (14) years ~nd thare heva bee~ no
apparent a~oblems.
Commtssionmr Bushare offe re d Resolution No. PC80-158 and moved for tts passsge •nd
adoption that the Anaheim City Planning Commlssion does heraby grant Petttian for
Conditlonel Use P4rmit No. 2106 for a maxtmum of 75 birds ta be kept on aach parcel for a
period of one year (1) 9ul~Ject ta revtaw far possible nxtansiona of time~ and subJect Lo
Interdepartmental Committee ~ecoa~endattons.
On roll cal l~ the foregotng ~esol ution was passed t~y t.he fol laving vate:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BO UAS~ BUSHORE~ FRY~ HERBST, KING~ TOLAR
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
A85ENT: COMMISSIONER5: B ARNES
Chairnw~ Tolar explained if the petitlo~ers continue to conduct their hobby In the same
nwnner and there are na problems, the Comrnissio~ witl p~obsbly autom~ticelly revie+~r and
continue the use yearly.
9/x2/8o
~;
' j
MINUTES. ANANE I N CI TY PL11HH I NG COMMi SS I ON ~ SEPTEM9ER 22. 1980 a0-550
ITEN N0. 4 PU~LIC HEARING. OM~IERSt ERIC AND HEIDI E. NASN~
R IE VE DECLAMTION 1855 Sou-h H~rbor 8oul~va~d~ A~shAlm~ CA 92802~
. -81•11
- Prap~rcy described as a ~ect~ngulsrly•sh~ped
jTTi~~'~i~T pa~cel of Isnd consisting of ~pproximately 5600
NO N E MI N0. 2,^1 8 square feet~ hevi~9 ~ frontage of approxtmat~iy
y6 feet on the wes t sid~ of Harbor Boulevard ,
having s maximum depth of approximately
1Q0 fe~t and being locet~d e~proxinrtely 4A0 feet north o~ the centerline of South Street~
•nd further described a~c bZ7 South Harbor 6oulevsrd, Property presently classifled RS-
7200 (RESIDE N71Al~ SINGLE•FAMILY) 20NE.
R~C~ASSIFICATION REQUEST: RS•7200 to CL
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST: To permit camierctal use of a rasidentie) structure with
woiver of minimum nunber af parking spaces.
Tha~e was ono Intcrested person present~ ~nd although the staff report to the Planning
Commissiun dated Saptemb~r 22, 19a0 was nat read at the public hearing~ tt is refer red to
and made a port of the mtnut~s.
Neidi Nash, explatn~d the requeat Is for rezo~inn so they can continue the whalesale~ and
retal) gitt end novelty shop which they are currently conductinc~ et the Inn at the Park.
laverne Nemi~ 710 South Pine Street~ (ndtceted she was conce~ned sbout parking and asked
if the elley would be widened.
Mrs . Nesh ex~ 1 s i ned three pa rk i ng spaces wou 1 d be ava I 1 ab 1 e t n the ya rd and the ga rage
doo r would be removed to make two additionel spaces, for a total of five parking spaces
whieh does meet the Codc.
7HE PURLIC NEARING WAS CLOSEO.
ACTiQN: Cortmtssioner Ki~y oFfe red e motion~ s~conded by Commlssioner 8usiiore and MOTION
C RaIEU (Commissioner Barnes beiny absent) ~ that the Anaheim Clty Planning Commission has
ravtcwed the propasal to racla~stfy subJect property from the RS-7200 (Residenttal,
Singie•Famlly) tone to Che CL (Commerciai~ Limlted) Ione to permit commercial use of e
residenttal atructure wfth watvers of mininwm number of pa~kinq spaces on a rectangularly
ahaped parce) of land consisting of approxim~tely y600 s quare feet on the west side of
Harbor Boulevard~ havtng a maximum depth of approximately 100 feet and being located
app roxtmetely 400 feet ~orth of tha cente~llne of South Street; and does hereby app rove
che Negative Oeclaratlon fran the ~equirement to prepare an envtronmant~l impact r~port on
the basis that there would be no significant indivtdual or cumulative adversa
environmenta) impact due to the approval of this Negattve De claration stnce the M aheim
General Plan designates the subj ect property for comme~cial, professional land uses
coatinensurate with the praposal; that no sensittve enviro~men tal Impacts are Involvad in
the proposal; that the Initia) Study submitted by tha pe titioner i~dtcates no signiftcant
indivfdual ar cumulative adverse environmental impacts; and thst the Negative Declar~tto~
subatantisttng the foregoi~~3 findings is on file in the City of Ilneheim Planning
Da{aartment.
Commissioner King orfered Resolution N0. PC80-159 and moved fo~ its passe~e and adoptio~
tha t the Anaheim Ctty Planntng Cammission does hereby grant Petitlon for aeclasstfication
No. 80-51-11~ sub)ect to Interdepartmental Committee recommendations.
9/22/$0
~
~ }
MINUTES~ ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING C4MMISSION~ SEPTEM6Ell 22. 19~
EIR NEGATIVE DECLARA710N~ RECLASSIFICATION NQ. 80•81-i1, WAIVER OF
CODE REQUIREMEN7~ AND.CONOITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 2108 (CONTINUED)
On roll u I1~ Rhe foregoinq resalutlon was pasaed by the follcwing vot~s
AYES: COMMISSIQNERS: BOUAS~ BU5NORE~ FRY~ HERBST~ KING~ TOLAR
NOESs CQMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: GOMMISSIONERS: BARNES
80- S51
Commissione~ King offered Resolution No. PC80-160~ in pa~t~ denying the request for waiver
of Code requlrament on the basis that additianal tnformation submitted subsequent to
advorttsemnnt indtcated adequate parking ~paces provtded in conformance wtth Code
raquirement~ a~d subJect to interdepsrtmental Commtttee recomma~d~tions.
On roll cail~ the forngoing resplutt~n was pa~sed by the fallowing vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BOUAS~ BUS~IORE~ FRY~ HEitBST~ KING~ TOIAR
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSCNT: COMMISSIONER5: BARt~ES
ITEM N0. PUBLIC HEARING. OWNERS: IAKEVIEW PIAZA INVESTMENT
R CATEGORICl1LLY EXEMPT-CLASS 1 CO.. LTD.~ 161 Town and Country~ Orange~ CA 92668
D U M . AGENTS: THE WESTERNER SANDIdICH ANO DELICATESSEN,
VIOLET BRUEGL~ 420 North Lak~vlew Avenue~ Anahelm~
CA 92807. Petltloner requests permissia~ TO PERMIT
AN SAIE OF OEER AND W1NE IN AN EXISTING RESTAURANT IN TNE CL ZQNE on ~+~operty de~cribed as
an trregularly-sha~zed parcel of la~d consisting of approxtmetely 3.1 acres located north
~nd east of the nurtheasc corner of McKinnon Orive and Lakeview Av~nue, having approxlmete
frontages of 119 feet an the north side of McKtnnon Ortve~ anA 248 feet an the east side
of Lakeview Avenue~ snd further desc~ibed as ~~20 Lakeviar Avenue (The Nester~er).
Property preaently classifled CL (COhMERCIAL, LIMITED) ZONE.
Thera was no ane indicating their presence in opposition to subJect request~ and although
the stsff ~eport to the Planning Commisslo~ dated Septenber 22~ 1980 waa noC read at the
public heeriny~ it is referred to ~nd made a part of thc minutes.
Frances Holden, representing Violet Bruegel~ wes present to ansy+er a~y questlons.
~HE PUBLIC H~ARIWG WAS CLOSED.
It was noteJ the Planning Director or his authorited representattve has determined that
the proposed pro)ect felis within tha definition of Categorical Exemptions~ Cl~sss 1* as
defined in paragraph 2 of the Ctty of Anaheim Environmental Impact Report Guidelines snd
is, therefore, categorlcally exnmpt f~om the r~quirement to prepare an EiR.
ACTION: Commissioner Herbst offere~ Resolutlon Wo. PC80-161 and moved for its passage snd
a opt on that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby 9r~nt Conditional Use
Permtt No. 2111, subject to Interdepa~tme~tal Conmittee recomme~dations.
On roll cell~ the foregoing resolutia~ was pasaed by the followtng vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BOUAS, BUSHORE, FRY~ HERBST~ KIHG~ TOIAR
NQES: COMM1S510NERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BARNES
9/22/80
~ ~ t
i
MiNUTES, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION~ SEPTEMBER 22~ 1980 80-552
IT~M N0. 6 PUBLIL HEARING. OWNERS= SDC/BEI-RD-EUCLIO~ P. 0.
~~1I~~RICAL EXEMPTION•CLASS 1 1880~ N~vport B~ach~ CA 92660. ACENTt STEPHEN
_..:...,, ~ __ 1,_. STIEFEL~ 514Q C~~di~wood Street~ lakewood~ CA 90~12.
P~titlo~e~ requests pe~~nission TO PERMIT ON-SALE OF
BEER AND WINE IN AN EXISTING RESTIWRANT a~ property
described as a rectengutarly~shaped parcel of tand consisting of approximately 0.92 acre
located at the sauthwest corner of Romneya Drtve and Euclid Street~ having app~oxtmate
frontages of 160 feet on the south side of Romneys Driva, and Z50 feet on the west slde of
Eucild St~eet, and fu~ther ~escr(bed as 1191 North Euclid Street (The Saafood Broiler).
Property prasently classified CL (COMM~RCIAL~ IINITEO) ZONE.
There was no one indi uting their presence in opposltla~ to subJect request~ and although
the •tsff report to the Planni~g Commisslan dated Septembnr 22, 1980 was nct read at the
pubiic hearing~ tt is refcrred to snd mede s part of the mtnut~s.
Steve Stiefoi~ sgent~ was present to answer any questions.
7HC PUBLIC HEARING WAS CI.OSED.
It was noted the Planntng Otrector ar hls authorised repreaentattve hai determined th~t
tha propused proJect falls wtchin the dofiniti~,n of Categorical Exemptions~ Clas~ i~ as
defined in paragreph 2 of the Cltr of Anaheim Environmantal Impact Report Guideltnes and
is~ therefore, categortcally axemnt from the ~equlrerr~nt to propa~e an EIR.
ACTIOH: Commissioner Ktng offered Resolution No. Pt8Q•162 and moved for its paasege and
adopt on~ that the Anahelm City Pianning Commissinn does hereby gr~~t Petitian for
Condltlona) Use Permit No. 2112~ subjecc to Interdepartmenxal Commtttee recommendattons.
On roll ca11~ the foregoing r~solution was passed by the foilowing vote:
AYES; COMMISSIONERS: BOUAS,
NOES: COMF115S I ONERS : NONE
ABSEN'f: COHMISSIONERS: 6ARNE5
ITEM N0.~
R 1 i 1 VE DECLARAt1011
CONUITIONAL USE ERMIT N0. 2113
BUSHORE~ FRY~ HER8S7. KiNG, TOLAR
PUBLiC HEARING. OIJNERS: ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTItICT
P. 0. Box 8300~ Fou~tain Valley, CA 92708. AGENT:
DAH COPP CauSHING CORP.~ 146Y5 Carmcnlta Rned,
Sutte 210, Norwslk~ CA 90650. Petittone r requests
pe nnlssion TO PERHIT CONCREfE ANO ASPHA~T R~CYCLING
OPERATION IN TNE RS-A-43~000(SC) Zone o~ propcrty described as an irregularly-shsped
parcel of 1~nd conststing of approxirtwtely b.0 acres, hsvtng e frontage of app~oxtmately
650 feat on the east side of Richfield Reed~ having a rt~xlnsum depth of approxla~ttely 740
feet~ and betng located approximately 1~80 faet south of the cente~ltne of I.s Palma
A,venue. Prop~rty p~esently classified RS•A-43.000(SC) (RESIDENTIAL/AG~ICUITURAL SCENIC
~YERLAY) ZONE.
There wss no one indicattng their presence in opposition to subJect request~ and although
the staff repart Lo ~he Planning Commission dated Septenbar 22. 1980 was not read at the
publtc hearing~ It is referred to and meck a part of the ~ninutes.
D~n Capp~ egent~ exp~ained he hss bsen in the concrete and asphalt recycting business
since 1972 i~ Sant~ Fe Springs snd there hsve been no noise or dust problen~s. He stated
he has had satls for materral in this area, but due to th~e high transportation costs
8/22/80
~
t
f
MINUTES~ ANIINEIM CITY PUINNING COMMISSION, SEPTENBER 22~ 1980 80•S53
EIR NEGATIVE QECLAR/-TION AND CONDITIONAI USE PERMIT N0. 2113 (CONTINUCD)
i~w~w ri~~.~
ca~not compot~; how~w r~ if this stte li establi¢had~ th~ natura) r~source• baing t~ken
fran th~ unyons un be reducad. Ha asked ta~ cls~iftcstlon reg~rdinq Inte~depa~tmental
Commlttee ~ecomme~dation Condition No. 3~ ~~nd asked if th~~e are a~~ r~qut~ements for
curbt, gutters a~ streets.
Dsan Shercr~ Assist++nt Planner~ axplalned the exhiblt rafe~rad to Is the ane submitted by
tha peti tloner.
J~q Titus, Office Engtnee~. explalnad street improvements has be0n discussed with the
petltioner and th~ Engineering Oopsrtment does not see a~y need ta requlre addttlo~s)
tmp rovementa or dedtcation et thls ttme~ howeve~~ there is a proposed csnditlnn thst
requi~es when this condltional uso permlt ts g~ented, conditions of pending
Reclassification No. 6$-66-24 be completed und there are Impro:~emenc~ and dedicatlona
requl~ed by the reclessiftcetio~. Ne tuggested Candttlon No. 3 be deleted.
TNE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED.
ACTION: Commisstoner Ki~g offered a motlo~~ seconded by Commissloner Tolar ar.d MOTION
CARRIEO (Commissioner Barnes belr~g absent), Lhat the Anahelm City Planning Commtsslon hes
revi~wcd the proposal to parmit a concrete and a:,phsit recycling aperetlan in the RS-A-
4;~000(SC) (Residential/Ayricultural~ 5centc Corridor Overley) 2one on an I~regularly-
al~aped parce.i of land ccx~~t~tting of approximetely 6. ) acres, having a frontaga of
~pp roximitely 650 feet on the east side of ~ichfield Road~ hevtnq a maxJmum dapkh af
approximately 740 feat and being located apprvcirnately 1280 feet south of centerltne of ld
Palma Avenue; and does hereby approve chc Nngativ~ Oecla~atton from th~ requtrement to
prepare an enviranmental Impact repo~t on the basis that there would ~e no sig~ificant
fndividual or cumulacive adverse e~vironrtrental Impact due to the appravsl of this tk gative
Declaratlon stnce the Ai.ehetm Ge~eral Plan designates the subJect p~c~perty for gen~era)
industria) land uses canmensurete aith the proposal; that no sansl~i+e environmentat
(mpacts are involved tn the p~opo~al; that the Inittai Study suDmit~+ed by the petittoner
i~dicates no significant individual or cumulative ~dverse envirQnme~^~t~! tmpacts; and that
the Negatlve Declaration substantiating the fo~eyoing findtngs is ~Mn file in the Ctty of
Anaheim Pianntng tkpartment.
Chai rnan Tolar stet~d he Kould 1 tke to see s two-year tinwe 1 tmit rt'or ~evie~v of this use
a~~d Mr. Copp explained he has a six-year lease with a six-monch ~.anceliation clause In
case the Weter Districc nee~s th~ property at anytime in the fut~~re.
Commisstoner King offered Resalutian No. PC80•167 ana moved for its passage and adoption
that the Anaheim City Planning Commis:;Ion does hereby qrant the Petltlan for Conditlona)
Usa Permit No. 2113~ for e dro-year pc~tod of tln+e sub)ect to y~terdepartmental Commtttee
recortmendetions.
On roll call, the for~agoing resolutio~ Has passed by th~ following vote:
AYE5: LOMMISSIONERS: E10UA5~ BUSHORF.~ FRY~ HERBST. KING~ TOLAR
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: t10NE
ABSENT: CpMMISSiONERS: BARNES
9/22/80
~~~
MINUTES, ANAHEIM CITY °LANNING COMMISSION, September 22~ 1980 80~554
IT~M N0. 8
(tEPORIS AND RECOMMi N A i I~,S :
A. VARIANCE N0. 2 81 - Requeat for termination from Evs Cast(llo. ~ppltcant~ fo~•
propsrty at 7~• Pa~~~~e Street because subJect property will be davelop~d to
Code requirements and, tharefore~ doe~ not need tl~e va~iance.
A~T~ IONi, Commissloner King offered Resolution No. PCBO-164 and mcved for its
passage a~d adoption thet the Anaheim City Planning Commisslon does hereby terminate
all proceedings in cannection with VariAnce No. 2981.
On roll call the foreqoing resnlution Mas passed by the foltawing v~te:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BOUAS~ SUSHOR~~~ FRY~ HERBST, KING ANU TOLAR
NQ~S: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 6ARNE5
B. VARIANCE N0. 3~5 - aequest for tr rn+ination f~om Paul F. Schule, applicant, for
property at~~~North Kreemer Boulevard du~ to conditions ;n,~osed by Resolution
No, 78-246 appraved an Qctober 't3„ 1978 to canvercan exiscing single-family
residence into an fndustrial use
ACTION: Cc~nxnissioner King afr~..a~,-d Resalution No.PC80-165 end moved for its passage
and adpptlon that the Anahei ,.r,~,r Planning Cammission daes hereby terminate all
proceedings in connectian Y., --` ~~asi~rsce No. ,5055.
On rotl call the fore~ina ~c~°~c--+~-~~ was passed by cfie foltowing vate:
AYES : COMM I SS I ONERS :?~i-+~ ,~t1~-~10RE ~ FRY , HER85T . K I NG Al~I~ 70LAR
NOES: COMMISSIONERS '~A~~
ABS~:sIT ; COMM I S5 I ONERS :;~`
C. VARIANCE N0. 189 -~V~~' ~~~ t~rmination from Chris Musella~Braille Institute~
owner~ or prope~ty 1or~ ax the southwest carner of Crescent Aven~~e and Dale
Avenue due to canditioi.-. ~' ~roval of Conditional Use Permit No. 2035 granted
on August 11~ 1980 to prr~w ~xpansion of existing priv~te educational institution
in an existing reside~cs an~i retain an existing recreational field on subject
property.
ACTION~ Commissio~er +cin~ affered aesolution No. PC80-166 and moved ~For its passage
and adoption that tMr~ Atr~wem C~ty Planning Commission does hereby terminate all
prac~edings in co~nectiea, with ariance No. 784.
On roll cal'1 the foregvi~-g res~lution was passed by the followin9 vote:
AKES: COMI'11SSIQMERS: BOUAS~ BUSHORE, FRY, HERBST~ KING ANO TOLAR
+wOES : CO~~ SSrONEFS : NONE
~ABSENT: COIM~115SIONERS: BARNES
9/22/80
~~
MINUTES~ ANAHEIM CITY PI!,NNING COMMISSION~ Saptember 22~ 1980 80•y55
IYEM N0. 8. REPORTS ANO RECOMMENDATIONS (conttnued)
D. RECLAS5IFICATION N0. 8- -k CONQITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 1 2 AND VARIANCE
N0, 0 2- RequQSt or retroactive extens ona a t me rom A1 red 0. Paino
or property tocated on tha east side of Heyward Street end et 727 South Beach
Bouleverd stnce cons*.ruccion wlll not begin~ntil early 1981 end no {~revious
extenslons of tirt~ have been grantod.
ACYION; Commissioner King offtred a motlon, seconded by Cnmmissioner Bouas
an~'MOTION CARaIED (Commissione~ 8srr~es bel~g ~bsent) that the P,naheim City
Planning Commisslon does hereby grant one-year retroactive extensions of time
for Reclassiflcetion No. 78-79-43~Condicional Use Permit No. 1972~ and Variance
No, 3092 to exptre Juty 2, Ig81.
E. VARIANCE N0. 284g - Request for a one-year extenston of time from Vic Peloquin
or~ property at 445 "C" EASt La Palma Avenue to permit retall sales of sandwiches
in the ML (Industrlal,Limited) Zonr.
ACTION: Commissloner King offered a motionti seconded by Commissioner Bouas end
M~~1 CARRIED (Commissloner 9arnes being absent) that the Anaheim City Planning
Commission does hereby grant a one-year extension of timc for Variance Na. 2849~
to expire Septen~er 27~ 1981.
F. RECLASSIFICAT~ON N0. 79-~-8 - Request fo~ an extens(on of time from Danfel A.
Salceda~ Anaheim Hills, Inc., for property located on the north side of Canyon
Rim Road approxirnately 600 feet west of the centerline of ~errano Avenue in order
to complete final planning and enginerring of the proJect.
ACTION: Commissioner King offered a motion~ seconded by Commissioner Bou~s a~d
MOTION CARRIED (Commissioner 9arnes bei~g absent) that the Anaheim City Planning
Commiaslon does hereby grant a one-year retroactive extension af time for
Reclassification No. 79-80-8 [o expire September 10, 1981.
G. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 1890 - Request fur an extenaion of time from Frank
Krogman or property at 2 0. La Palma Avenue to per it on-sale beer and wine
in an existing restaurant.
ACTION: Commisstoner King offered a motion~ seconded by Commissioner Bouas and
MOTTIOrN CARRIED (Commisstoner Barnes being absent) that the Anaheim City Planning
Commission does hereby grant a two-year extension of time for Conditional Uss
Permit No. 1890 to cxpire on September 25. 1982.
H. RECLASSIFICATiQN N0. 77-78-61 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 1~54 ANO VARIANCE N0.
3027 - Request or two-yea~ retroactive extens on of time from Faul Gardner
~or property at 3109 west Orange Avenue .
ACTION: Commissioner King offered a motion~ seconded by Commissioner Bouas and
MOTION CARRIEp (Cortmissioner Barnes being absent) that the Anaheim City Planning
Commission does hereby grant a two-year retroacCive extension of t(me for
Rectassification No. 77-78-61~Conditionai Usa Permit No. 1854 and Variance No.
3d27, to expire on June 5- 19$~•
9/22/80
~ ~ ~ 1
MINUTES, ANANEiM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION, Sepcember 22~ 1980 ~'S56
ITEM N0. 6- REPORTS AND aECOMMENpATIONS (continued)
I. VARIANCE N0. IW21 - Request f~r t~rminatlon from William Bredger for propcrty at
. L nco n venue for converslon of a guagt house to living quarterg.
ACTION: Commissloner King affered Resolutlon No. PC80-167 and moved for its
passage and ~doption th+~t the Anahelm City Planning Commisslon does hereby
terminate all proceedi~gs in connection with Variance No. 1421.
On ~oli call the foregoing resolutlon was passed by the following vote:
AYES; COMMISSIONERS: BOUAS~ BUSHORE~ t'RY~ HER85T, KING AND TOIAR
NOES: COMMiSSIONERS: NONE
AB5ENT: COMMISSIONERS: BARNES
J. DRAF7 HOUSING ELEMENI'/EIa - Submittal to State for rGliminar review.
The sta report to the lann ng Comm ss on dated September 22~ 19 0 noted that
Anaheim's present Nousing Element was adopted in May 1973; subsequcntly~ in
November 1~77, the Ca!ifo~nia Dep~rtment of Housing and Cortxnunity Development
adopted revised guidelines. In a desire to update the City'S Nousing Element~
a Housing consultant wa~ sel~cted to obtain the best posslble data/analysis as
well as coordination with the present development of City policies and ordinances
(such as the Condomini~~m Ordlnance). In addition, the consultant has addressed
on-goiny cha~ges to the State Guidelines (such as the need t~ address "manufactured"
housing), The draft Element p~eparation has been guided by the City's Housing
Elemcnt Citlzen Advisory Committee and reviewed on January 17, 1980 and September
11~ 1~~0~ and recommended that it be forwarded to the Planning Commission and City
Councll for prellminary submittal tu the State.
AGTION: Commissioner King offe~ed a motion~ seconded by Commissi4ner Bouas and
M t N CARRIEQ (Commissioner Barnes being absent) that the Anaheim City Planning
Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council that the Draft Housing
Elert~nt/EIR be submitted to the State for preltminary review prior to preparation
and processing of the final Housing Etement/EIR.
K. R~,,C,~ASSIFICATION N0. 79-80-31 - Nunc pro tunc resolution to correct a typo g~aphical
error tn Resolution No. 0- 0 g~anting said reclassification on preperty
located at the southeast corner of Frontera Street and Glassell Street.
ACTION: Commissioner King offered Resotution No. PC80-168 and m~ved for its
passage and adoptton that the Anafieim City Planning Canxnission does hereby
a nunc pro tunc resolution amending PC80-60.
On roll calf the foregoing resalution was passed by the followtng vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BOUAS~ 9USHORE~ FRY~ HERBST, KING AND TOLAR
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BARNES
ADJOUItNMENT :
There being no further business~ Commissloner Fry offered a motion~ seconded by Commissioner
King and MOTIOk CARR~ED that the meetin~ be adlourned.
The meeting was ad]ourned at 2:10 p.m. Resp tfully syqmit ed,
.~"
Ed t~rris 4/22/80