Minutes-PC 1982/07/12~ ~~~ I~
R]Dat7W1A M8RT2NG A! TFI! 11NAHEIM CITY PI.JINNINO C(.MWZ8820N
....._.
A~GULIIR The requler meetinq ~~! th~ 1lnaheim City Plenninq Coam-issien
MpELTING wse relled ko ord~r by Cheirm~n Fry at 10:15 a.m., July 12,
1982, in the Council Chataber., a querwn bainq prasent end the
Coaaaiesion reviewed planr of the items ~n today's agend~.
RECESB: 11:30 p.m~
RBCONVlsNE: 1~30 p.m. for public teetitaony
pRESRNT: Chai.rrnan ~ Fry
Ccxnmissionerae Houes, Buahur~e, Nerbet, Rinq, McBurney
ABSL~NT: Conanis~sioners s 8arnos
AL80 PRESBNTs 1lnniks 4entalol~ti Aaeistent pirector tor Zonirg
Jack t4hite Aaeiatent City 1!ttorney
J~y Titus Of~ice 8ngineez
Denn f3herer 1-eeietent Plenner
Yaul Sinqer Traffic fnqineer
Edith Harrie Planning Coa~inaior~ SecrRtary
PLSDGE O1* ALLEGIJWCE TA TNE FLAG LED BYt Coauaisalonar King
APPROVIIL OF MYNt7T1:S - Commiseioner King offered e motion, secbnded by
Coaan~scioner gouAS end MOTION CARRIEb {Conmiesioner Barn~s dbsent) thet tF,e
minutaa o! the meetinq af .7une 28, 19H2, be Approve~ ee aulxaitted•
ITgM NO. l: - BIK NEGATIVE DSCLIIRATZON AND CONDITION1l1. U8E PS1~12T NO. 2350:
PUHLIC HEJ1RIt~1G. C)WNBR: J.R. 11ND GS?i~Vl1 SCHALZ, 900 Weat Jade Way, 1Viaheim,
CA 92805. AGENT: LYNN H. OLIVF.R , 819 South Euclid 3trRet, 1-naheini, Cl~
926Q2. Praperty described as a rectanqu.lerly-ohAped parcel ot lan~i consiating
of npproximetely 0.3 acre, l~cated at 815~ Sc~utt; Euclid 3treet (Robext'e Room).
CONDITIONAL USE R~QUE3Ts To pe~rmit a cocktail lounqe in the C.'G (Commerolal,
G~neral) Zone.
ContinuRd trcxn the meeting cf June 28, 1982.
There war~ ane person indicatinq her presence in oppaeit.ion to aubject request,
and elthouqh the staf! report wse not read, it i• referred to and nwAde a part
at the rainutee.
Ted llndersoa, I-gant, 300 South Hsrbor Boulevard, 11na-heim, explained thie
mettar wae rc~ntin~eQ in order far hia client to considar the leaaibility of a
block wall at the edqe o! the prwmi~es. H~ atated his cli~nt :~sa con~acted
thr~e contractc~r.s and they have subaitt~d bida !or a 6-P~ot h~tgh block wall on
the reax e8qe o~ tha pr.ap~zty encl l•.he e~kiaates were~ betwe~n ~3,800 and
Ei2-347 7112/92
1 ~ ,~
NZNtJO'ES, :+NAl1EIM CITY PLANNING COMMIISSION, July 12, 19f~2 82-348
~4,800. N~ •tak~d h~ hnA rsvieweA thie •ltuatlan wilh ths opposiCio~, Mr~.
McBain, jast b~tor~ ~od~y's awet~inq, ~nd l,hay both ~qree thet a block wall
•lonq th• b~ck vrould not •olv• the prablem cc~aq~letely bec~u~a there •ra other
~idas to th~ property. He ststad Mrs. McBuin suqqested e fence along the
north sid~ ~~ r-ell end this •~-oul.d meen a cost nf •pproxip-Ately ;9.000 ~nd that
woulA create a~ubskantial hard~hip on the petitioner.
~!r. 1lnder~en •tetRd th~ contrectore contected al~o mentioned tha~c~ would
~,robably be e aavere prob~em with people running into a block well with their
vshiale~, pointing out thare are 40 qaragee along t~hat ellay for thd tenante
in th~s epartment complex, and also tlie block well would cr~ate more treffic
conqe~~tion.
Mr. 1-nderson etateQ Ms. MeBain hed mentioned a-el~unctioninq o! tha al~rm
eystem et the previoua meating. He ateted he he8 e a~emorandum lroa~ the Cily
of Aneheim which Eteto~s the alere~ has not ynne ~ff since Mr• Oliver had it
instelled and thet he hed ~ltio contected the maker o! tha ayetem, Honeywell,
and n reproaentativ~ hed inepected 1t and found it was not even op~rating ~n!1
it i+~ now bnck in operation end the representetive indicated it will not
maltunr.tion in the future, even !t i~ hed in the peet.
Mr. 1lndereon continued that there wes e problea~ mentioned concerninq nolee
becauae tha rear dc~ozs o! t.h~s facility were being lelt open, but the t+ir
Gonditioning syetem hae n~w been repeired und there will be no further prubl~m
with leeving the doore «I~en.
Reqarding the problem o! vehicl~e exitiny lrom the reer onto the nlleyo Mr.
~ndereon expleined ha hnd diac.ue~ed thie with the City'$ Trntfic Enqineec end
he wae concerned about on-aite ci:•culation v+hich meane the traftic would etay
within ±he pr.utnisee once it ceme trom the public atreet. He- Rdded he beliaved
Mr. Singer ie satiatied with the suqqested ~odification to put directional
errows and eigne tox the exit ~nd ~antranc~s only.
Mr. J-nderson eteted they ere wS.llinq to do enythiny reasanoble to ~inimise Mr.
and Mrs. Mceain'e disccxafort, but felt the $9,000 ~xpenditure rrould be out o!
the question. He explAined they are saa~kinq e conditienal use pe,rmit that
will ellow theai to cen~e the sale of food on eite and they are not changinq
the operetion and do not anticipate nny major chnnqe in the number or type oP
patron using the facility.
t+lr. ]1r~derson presented the coni•ractor's bids and photoqraphs ot the erba to
ehow what happens to adjacent property if a block vall is conatructRd, and
al.o the mentorendwn trom the City of 1lnahef.a~ regarding the alarm eystem.
Ruth McBain, 1711 W. Crone, Anaheim, stated thzee weeks a~o she raceived an
official notice which steted this chanqe could affect her proparty and that
ehe toak time otf work and csme to the meeting to lot it be known that
Robext's Roos a!lectA har peace, privecy, health and satety e~d that the
tra!!ic i~ really too rauch, especially at 1:30 and 2c00 !.n the morninq ahen
she ha. to qet up early and qo to work the next day. 8he added she would like
tc he~ve the Como~iesionere make a fl.eld trip to the arsa betor~ making a
deciaion on this request. She etated thie ie e camaarcial pzopezty on Suclid,
but she lives in R residential area and she ie only on• pereon, but would like
her concerns cansidered.
7/12/81
~`
MlINUT1:8 l1NAHEIM CITY PLANNING CONIMI88ION, July 12, 1982 82•349
Z`H8 FUBLIC HS11R2NG WJ18 CIA81l0.
Commis~ioner Kinq •teted the ~~rpose ~f tho block well wes to keap treffic nut
o! th~ elle,y becauee of noixe ehooe houre which would be very diet.urbing.
Connniosloner Nerbet eteted he thought thero .is an elkernative and euggeete~
3-or 4-inch plpe poeta with chain betwoe~n to ~tock tho alley otF. He etdted
he would not be !n favor o! ehe request unl~eea eomeChinq ia done to keap
treffic out of the alley.
Cc~nnmiesioner Hexbet etated burglary alerme do mellunction, no metter what tha
compnny repreeentative aaye, becauae khe one et hie bueihesa ~uet did.
Mr. Anderson auqqeated ane wdy to alleviate Me. McBa.in'e concerns regerding
apeeding tralfic in the alley ie for the city to install a siqn.
Commiaeioner King replied a siqn would not heve very much of en e~fect and
etated he likea Ccw~miaei.c-ner Herbek's sug7estion for the poata and ehair,e
eince the idea is to kee,p customere out ~~f the elley. Coa~mieeioner HezUst
edded people cominq out of a bar w~ould not pny any nhtention to eign...
Mr. Andereon stated they have considered a chainlink fence~ however, even
though the sugqestfon for posts and chair~a ~ounds 11ke a qood idea, in Cerme
of practical e~pplicati~n, he did not think it would do any gcx~d aince Ms.
McBain ia concerned about n~ise with peopl~ xterting th~*ir engines and leaving
the ber.
Chairnu-n Fry etated trnffic cennot be stapped from coming into the elley, but
the Camaisaion aente to cut down on the traffic: tl~at would be qer-era~ed by
ehin operation and Cc~nnniesioner Herbet'a idea would nnt coet a lot of mon~sy.
Mr. Anderson esked if the requeet cou:d F~ qranted if hle clipnt ie willing to
etipulate to provide something comparable t4 what CammiesionQr Herbet hag
suqgeeted. He esked if this hcarinq cc~uld be ~~ostponed unti] later in today's
hearinq in order for him to speak wit}i his client.
A TEMPbR!-RY POSZ'PQNBMENT WAS GR]~NT~D .
Pollowinq the hearing for Item No. 2, ~ir. Andernon stated he had met wi.th his
client and he ie willing to etipulate to provide barriers co~perable to what
waa ~ugqeeted (3" or 4" pipe pasts with cheina) bordering the alley and nlso
an the nozth side and that they would like 120 ~lt~ys to co~nply. He added hia
clinnt had diaruesed the block well with his insurancq egent nnd leArned that
ineurance could possibly be a problem.
Chdirmun Fry etaced the Planninq Cameaiseion will nat qet iavolv~+d in inau.cance
conaernsr that i~ the petitioner wiahe6 to ha~-e the requeat acted upan with
the e~tipulation, there w~.ll be no etr.inge ~ttaahed t~ the approvel.
Mr. 1lndezooa rta~Qd they are willing to stipulate to provide the 3" or 4" gipe-
posts wit,h chains, or somethinq caaparabl~, but aiay hava to cx-e back latAr
bacause t1-ere will be ~a insurance on the fence.
7/12/82
~~
MINi1Tl~8 ANIIHEIM CITY PLJINNING CC)MMSB~I'1N, July 12, 19A2 82-350
~-w : Copuni~~ionar Herbst oPlerad a motion, eeaandud by Caanni~~i~ner King
end MOTION C1IRRIBO (Conn~i~asioner Aeirno~ abssnt) thet tha Anehaim City P].anning
Commis~ion hea r~viewad the praposnl to p~zmit e cACktail lounqe in the ~f3
(Commer.cial, Genernl) ton~ on s rectangular~ly-shaped parcel ot l~nd conaiatinq
o! appraximeCaly 0.3 Rcre, having e frunta~~n o! epproximst~ly 128 faet on the
west eide o! Suelid Street, fily South buclld 8treett anc! Aoee hereby epprovo
the NegAtive i~ealaration lrom the zequir~ement to prepare an environm~ntal
impact report on the besie that there wauld t~e no eiqnilieent individuel or
cumuletivA e~fveree envirnnmuntal impact due to the +~pproval ot thio N'q~tivA
Declaration •ince the Aneheim General Plnn deeigneteo the eubject property for
qenerel canm~+rciel land uaes c~mmeneurete with the propoe4lt thet no sen~itive
environmental impncte are .involved in the propoaelJ thet the Initiel Study
submitted by the ~+e~titioner indicatee no eignificent ind~lviduel or cumuletive
edversa environmentel impactat e-nd thet tt~e Negative pecleration
subetantiating the loraqc~inq findinqa i~ on file in the City of Aneheim
Planning Gepertment.
Commisei~~ner Herbst offered ReeoZution No. PC82-134 end movPCl Por ite paeaeq~
an9 edoption thet thQ Jlnaheim City Plnn~ing Cownieeion does hersby qrent
Conditionnl Use PermSt No. 2350, nubject to tho petitioner's etipuletion to
provide a 3" or 4" pipe pc~ete lilled with concrete on 6-loot cantere an~i
cheino or ceble t+arricadA at a minimum h~ight og 3 feet nlonq the west end
north property lines ta prohibi.t acceae to the a11Ay from thd profsosed
cocktail lounqer and that ~he intarior circulation ahell be rdderigned and
properly merkedt and that the rear dcx~ra t.o tt~ee tacility shell remein closed
during bueine~s hous•e and aut~ jecr. c.o Interdereztmentol Cott~nittee
Recammendatic~ne.
Prior ko voting, the Coam~l8eion ~.;scuase~' the lenqth o~ time tor complience
with the barricede stipule`ian. Jack Whir.e, 1-esidtdnt City Attorney,
euqgested thnt it be caaaplied with prior to tt~e comwRnceQent of ectivity.
Denn Sherer, Aseie~tant Plt~nner, st~ted thie 1n an ~pplice+tion !or a cocktaii
lounge and right noN thoy ere operakinq ag a;reateurant and ~he ABC license
will not be clenred uncil the condit.inns have been met, and euqyesteA the
requ.tremen~ be before the coma-encea-ent of ect.lvity, se auggc~ate~ by Mr. White.
an roll cnll, ~he loregaing resolution vae paeaed by the follrnving vote:
11Y8$s CpdMI88ZJNE4t&: ~OUAB, BUSl:7RE, FRY, HERB$T, ICING, MC HUFtt~f'LY
NOES s COlNMI$SIONI~RS t NQ~NS
1188L~Tt CQMIyI$S10NERSt 811RlVS8
Jeck vlhite, 1lsaietant City Attorney, presented th~ wxitton right to appeal the
Planning Canraiseion's decision within 22 days to the City Counr.il.
7/12/8Z
~~'_,
~
;
MINZITIt$ ANANIEIM CITY P1+ANNING COMMISBION, July 12, 19H2 82-351
ITS1M NO. Z- EJR NBCJITIVB DBCL11R11TION, Wl1IVER 0~' COb~ RI~QUIR~MlCNT 11P1D
PUSI~IC HBARINa. OWNSRt MILLIAM C. 1WD VINCBNT T110RltINI~, P. O. 80X 309,
1lnaheim~ C~- °?Q05. 1-GRNTr JOHN VOGT, P. O. 8ox Z49, L1 Toro, Cl~ 92630.
Property ds~cr~bad eo an irreqularly-ehsped p+~rcel ot lend consietinq o!
epproximetely 1.25 acras, hAVinq e lronteqe ot approximaCely 240 leat on the
south e~ide o! Vermont Street, 512 Sest Vermont Avenue.
CONbITZUNAL USE RISQIJ~3Tt To permit an sukam~bile repair and et.ozeqe Lecility
in the ML (Industrial, Limited) 2one wi~h waivar of inex ~~um fence haight.
Continued iroa- the meetinq of June 28, 1982.
'P1~~re wde one interested person i:~dicating hie preeenc~ at tlie pub~ic he~aring,
end althouqh the etaff report to tha Planninq Commieeion wae nat reed, i t is
relerred to and auide a nart of the minutee.
William C. Teormina, ownerr expleine6 he he~ enet with hia neiqhbore ~since the
la st meetinq dnd finalized a Flan today !or landecapiny which ie Rvr~n bet ter
than the on~e eubenitted en~ pointed out th~ r~vi.eed plan shows a 16-loot ~+ide
la nd8aeped eraa inetead ot 10 leet on Verm~nt and tl~eir landscaping depth will
ms tch :he landscaping in front ot Interstete. He explained the landecap in~
w.i 11 be 10 leet wide in front on this p:operty beceuse o! perklnq.
D~an S~~erer, Aaaietant Plenner, reviewed the eubmltted revised plan snd
concurred with Mlr. Taormin~'a~ fiquree.
Rich B~aeis, Interstate Electrnnic:, et~ted tney are not oppc>e+ed ta thia
t equeat and are vnry pleaeed r-irh their neiqhbor's cooperatiort and logi cal
a t titude end feel thie plAn will benaf:t both proper*ine.
Camtniesioner Herbet auqqeeted elia-inating one driveway, continuing the lence,
drad rei x:ating che gate back to 35 feet.
Mr~ Taormina st.etod iht~~ ere trying to eeqreqate the oftice people and yard
people and aish to heve one entrance end one exit for the trucke end rrant to
limit the llow of treffic.
Cammiael.onax MlcBurn~ay painted out tt~e atatf repott indicetas the 'i"xaffic
Enginee~' haa ecceptad the plana.
a-CfIONs Cesm~i~sionsr Kinq olferc~d a aution, eeco~tded by Cocaaiasioner Souas
assd~ypTlpll CARRIED (Cnomissioner Barnes ebeenc) that khe 1-naheim City pl~nning
Coaea-iseSoR hes reviawed the proposal to pereait an suto~obile r~psir and
storeqe fecility in the KL (Industzisl, Lip-i~ed) sone Nith waiver• of a~aximwn
far.ce heiqfie on en irregulerl~-ehaped porc~l o! land cnnaistinq ot
:pproxJ.mately 1.25 acres, hav!nq A front~aqe of approxinu+tely 240 leet or~ the
south nide of Varawnk Avenue, SI.Z F•aat Vermant 71v~anuet snd daes h~zeby approve
iha Nagative Decleretion froaa the rsquireawnt to prapare An envirannental
iaipact r.e,poTt an the basia that there ~rould be na aignificsnt individual or
~ulative adverse anvironmental impact due to tho approvel o! thi£ f~teqativa
Oaclsreti~n •ince the Anaheim ~ientral plan dosiqnat.~s the ~uL~)~ct a~~~.r rty !or
g~nera~ indv~slrxisl lan~! a~ea lanA useo cor~e~~urate vi~th the propc>sal ~ that n~
7/22l81
~
MINUTIE9 71N71Ff1C7M CITX PLIINliING Cpl~lI$BION, July 12, 1982 P?-352
•ensitive ~nvirona-entel ia-pact• ere inv~lv~d in th• propo~~ll that tne tnitiel
8tudy submittsd by tha p~titi~nar indic.Rta~ no eiqniticant individual or
cutauletive edvazse environ~wntal ia~pactot ~nd thet the Negetiv~ D.clsretion
•ubstan~iatinq th~ loreqoing findinq• is on til~ in tha City of Anahoim
Pl+~nninq peparktnent.
Cota~nissioner Kinq o!lored a motion, •econded by Coma-1aNioner Hc~ua• end MOTION
CJIRRIED (Coa~nis~ioner Elernea eboent) that the Maheim City P~anning Cotroniseion
does hereby gr~nk the request tor weivsr o! code rsquirwenent !or maxl,anua lance
height on the b+ini~ that denial Kou1Q deprive eubje~C property o! a privil~ge
bming enjoyed by other properties in the aama cone end vicin: ty.
Coaunissionar Kinq olfered Reoolntion No. PC82-135 and moved ~or its pas~age
~nd adoption that the 1-naheim City Plsnning Commission does hereby qrant
Conditional Use Permit No. 2351, aubject to the revised plane prenented et the
public hA~rinq (identitied ae Exhibit le) indicatinq that the landsceped eree
edjecent to Vermont 8treet shall be, 16 t~et, rather than 10 leet es sho~vn on
Revisior- N~. 2 end eub~ect to Interdepartmental Coaunittea R,~aommendetians
On roll cnll, the foreqoing reselution was peeaed by th• fa2lowing vote:
11Y~$t COM9YlI$SION8R8: 60U1~.S, BUSHORE, FRY, HBRSST, ICIP)G, MC BURN$Y
NOESs CaMNI88IONERSs NONE
ABSENT : COMMIBAIONBRB s B1~RtiEB
Jack White, Aasietent City Att~rne~+, preaented the aritten right to eppeel the
Planning Coaa~ission'e deciaion within 22 deys to the City Council.
ITEM l~IC~. 3- EIR CJ1TL~I;ORICALLY EXl?lPT - CIJ1S3 21 1WD COPIDZTZQNAI~ USE PSR?IIT
N0. 1968.
__......._~
PUBLIC HLJIRI?1G. OWNERs DLJNN PROPBRTI~B CORPOMTiON, 28 Brookhollow Drive,
Santa Ana, CA 92705. 11GENiR': 8~11 BZVINB, 1895 S~uth Sentw Crus StrQet,
Anaheim, CA 92805. Prop~rty descziberd as a rectanqularly-shsped parcel of
land consistinq a! epproximetbly .26 acre, havinq a trontaqe nf appr~ximately
97 leet on tha west •ide of Santa Cruz StrQet, 1A95 8outh &enta Crus Street~
RIDQUESTs The Planning Coa~is~ion requenta a public hear.inq to cone.ider
revocation af CondlCionel Upa P~en~it No. 1968.
It was~ not~d the Plenning Departmant staff haa requeeted that ~ubjeck pstitior-
be withdrawn sin~e the businesa i~ no lange:~ opnratiny at this l~cation.
i/lZ/Na
~
MSNUTa~B 11N71HBIM CI'1'Y PIJ1NliING COMMI88ION, July 12, 1982 82-353
` ~
- 3IA N1DI311TIVE DECLIIRATION, liml'IJ188Z!'TCATI~N N0. 8~-83•l~ W~IINBR aF
~~~~r
EMlNT. CONDITIONAL U8E PEialIT NO. 2354 1W0 MAIVER Al~ CITY COVNCZL
NA.
PUSLIC H~ARING. O~INERr OEORQE M. KVBO, ET 1-I., 2888 I.ynrose Oriv~, Jlnehnim,
Cl- 92804. 11GSNT: THE U11itYSIC CdRPANY, 18002 f";ypa~rk Circ1R, irvina, CJ1
92714. Prop~rty da~cribed a• ~ rectanqularly-st~ep~d pwrc~l af le~nli con~isting
of epproximately 1.7 Acrae loceted At the n~rtt~arly terminue o! H~yr+ard
8treet, 721 Sout.h EAach Boulev~rd.
RaCL11$BIFICIITION RmQURST: CL (COMIPI1tRCIAL, I.IMZTED) and RB-11-43,000
(1taSIDSNTZIIL/11CRICULTURAL ) 20NB8 TO RM-3000 ( R~Cl3IUp~iTI11L, MULTIPLB-FAM2I.Y )?,OtJB
CONAITZONI-L UBa RBQUESTt TO CONSTRUCT 1- 35-1R~t2~' A!'r'ORDIIHL~ CONWMZNIUM
COMPLEX iPITN W11IVbR8 OF MINIMitDMI I,UT ARaJ1 PRR DWEGLZNG UNIT, MAXIMLIM STRUCTUi...L
HSIGHT, MINIMUM LIWDSCAP6D SL~TBACIC, MINIM~fM BIDBYARD BIET8~ICK, MINIMUM
RBCR811TION7IL/T~SI8URR 11RF.11 AND RBQUIRED SCitSIlt+III~G OF PARICING FACILITIEB.
P~"'1'ITIONBR REQqR$TS W1ITVER OF CI:'Y CCX7NCIL POLSCY N4. 547 PERT~INING TO
DENSITY AONUF3B8.
It wa~ noted the p~titionvr hae requested thnt subject pgtition be continued
to the meeting of July 26, 1982.
ACTION: Caamainsioner 1Cing olfezed a motion, seconded by Co~ani.aeloner Bouas
and MlOTION CARRIBD (Cc~m~-iaeioner Barnes abeent ~ that the 1lnaheim i'ity Plnnning
Commissior~ does hereby grant the petltioner's request to conti~uo the
atorementioned a~atter to L•he regul.arly-echec9ul~d meetinq o! July 26, 1982,
ITBM NC. 5- llIR N]DGJ-TIVE DECL11RJ1TION, WJIIVER OF CODE Rl:QUIR~LI!!IT AIVD
CONDITZOtaAL r18E PBRMiT NO. 2355.
PUHLIC HSARINC;. OMNERs KUM OK AND MIRJNG SHIK YUN, 735 South Beach Houlevard,
1-nnheim, G- 92804. AGENT: ULYSSEB ~. B11UER, I7790 Mr Allister, Ri.•~ereide, C1-
92503. Property c~~,crit,ed ae a rectanyulerly-aheped parcel of lsnd conaistinq
ot spproxim~ately .96 aere, havinq e frontsqe ot apprexia~ately 140 feet on the
west ~ide of B~ech Boulevard, 727 South Aescl- Boulevard.
CONDZTIONAL US1E RL;~tJEBT: To permit an 80-unit mot~l writh on-sale alcoholic
beveraqes in the CL (Commercial, Limited) 7one with vaivers of minimum number
of parklnq s~eces.
It was noked the p9titioner has requeeted that eubject petition be con~lnued
to the maetinq of 1luqust 9, 1982, in ordor foz ravised plan• ta be aubimitted.
A~TION: Coarnieeionsr Kinq offered a nwtiot~, s~cotided by Cam~iasioner 8oue~
and NOTZON CARRIED (Cnm~ineionar Barne^ nbsent ) thwt conAidwration of the
afor~asntioned a~attez ehall be conk~nued to the r~gularly-scheduled ~oeeting o!
1-uguat 9, 1~82, at the requeat of the petition~r~
7/7.2/82
l
, ;
MINU7'Q9 l1tiAN1~IM CITY PIJ1NNxN(i CqdMI88ION, July 12, 1982 8~-354
~~1_~. 6- 62R N~11TTVa DECIJlA11TION, W7IIVER b!' C006 RZQIIIREMENT AND
CONDITIc~NAL US~: F'~RMIT N0. Zs~~ .
PUeLTC H1lARINO. OWNSRr ROCKY 11~ T1IMNTSLLO, 8T AJ.., 39]1 !~c 1-rthur, Suite
102, Nwr+port 8eaah, C7~ 92~E^ - AGBNT~ INDEPFNDENT OITfDOdR l-DV~R'PI82NG, 979
North La Brea, Loo 11ng~lea, CJ- 90038. Proparty deearibed sa an
1rr~gularly-shsped parcel of lsnd consiatinq of eppr~ximet~ly 1.2 acres,
located on the w~+et ~ide o! Mi ~ ler Skreet betwaen Orangothorpe 1-vanue and
Gr~rrther Aoulavard ( 3331 Baet Oranqethorpe Jlvenue ).
CONpITIONAL U81! RDQU1lST: To permit two bi llboerds in the CL (Coamlercial .
Litnited ) 2one with waiver o! taaximuni dintence lrom highwey intersection.
Thezo was no one indiceting their preaence at the publio heerinq in ~ppo~ition
to qub j e~ct requeet And although the ate~f repc~rt to thg Planning Commisaion
was not reed et the public hearinq, it is referred to end atede ~ pext of tl~~
tninutes .
Chris Norby, Agent, IndependenC Outdoor Advertiaing, Z14 N. Yale, F'ullerton,
preaented photoqrephs ehowinq the type oP billboarda propc~aed. ,T~ck White,
Aseiatant City Attarney, explained any photoqraphe prenanted as evidencc will
be retained ee part o! thR record.
Mr. Nor.by ~ta~ed according to the code, oft-Aite eigns eres leqal, but the
iseue la that the siqna muet be 200 test frocn the interpection. He stnted it
this requc.et ie denied, the aiqna could skill t~ insta.lledj hof-ever, they feel
there ere several reasons why the 200-foot. requirement eh~uld be waivod. Ne
etate3 thie particular intersection at Crowther and Orangethorpe is unusuel
bec+~uee it is at a 30~ anqla, nnd to aoa~ply with the code would caus:. th~
dlqne ta overheng a v~ry nnrrotir drlvewa,y and that could intertcze with 'the
city traeh txuck accesa. He s~eted they ere a~eting all othar code
requir~en*_u for off-premiae aignst that the property is oeparated fr.otn the
nearest reaidential area by a~lood control chnnnel end is nbout 90 to 100
teet a~rayt and that code nlloa-s the siqr~s to be 300 aquere teet and theae both
will b~ only 72 aquare feet.
Mir. Norby ateted the eiqna are indiceted as billboarde, and relerred to the
photoqr~phA preeented rrhich Rhow what type diqno they w~ll be which is quite a
bit di!lerent thnn a typically thougt-t o! billbonrd snd noted tt~eae will be
amall attraative 01gna. He stated thelr coeapany teele this type aign ia a aaore
elfective means of ndvertieiny and this ie the only type siqn they will build.
Mr. Norby reterr~d to the Olyrpic Rvents which wi.ll be ache~duled for thie area
in 19g4, notinq advertiaers w~ 11 be ir~terleted in having their adver.tieing
here, eepecially tha aponaors o! the Olympice and many a1ll went the Olympic
logo os~ the eigna.
Mr. Norby stnted iP 'chie zequ~at is Qsniad, it ia poasible the awner of the
property will cancel hi~ agreesaent with their ~omp~+ny and have a coa~pany put
up a much higher and larqaz~ signi howaver, i! this is eppzovad, he can
guaresztee thr.t there Mill be no other signo oa the property.
TH~ PLTSL2C HEIIRING i0~8 CL03SD .
7/12/82
MIt~1~TE8 AN~HEIM CI'^Y PL~NNING COMh1I8RION, July 1~, 1982 82-355
~eo~mtoaionar N~rbR~ cleritied that even thouqh thio permit would bs for two
billboard~, Lh~y would be no lerc~r ~han 7Z square feat each. He atated he
was roncernsd about the aqent's coaimants reqsrding the elt.ernative~ i! Chis
request i~ denf.ed, notinq eny ~roparty awnex hae the riqht to requset snything
he wanre.
Mr. Nerby atstecl he eimply wanted ta point out thet the owner duee heva oth~r
options. Ne ateted he would be willing to atipulete thaC the eiqns woulcl be
no lerqer tl~an 72 aqusre tenk eech.
Commiegioner Xing pointad out thiB iA dn unueuel nhaped percc~l Knd
Camnni~eloner Nerbnt atated he hee no problem wit}~ the siqns nnd thouqh~t they
will be qood looking •iqna. Commlesi.oner Kinq clnrified thst tho s.ign will t,e
illuminated froro ineide and Mr. Norby replied only r~ne of the siqns will be
illwnineted.
~c:TION: Commieal.oner K.ing offerRA a mc~tion, e~conded hy Cc~mmissioner Bc~une
end M(yI'SON C11RFtIBp (Caaimioeionar 8arn~e ebeRnt) thek the Anahelm City ~'lenning
Ccxmniasi~n has reviewed th~ propnsal to permit two hillboarde in the CI.
(Comtne+rciel, Limite~l Zone with weiver o! meximum distance from l~iqhwey
intersectlon on en irrequlnrly-ehaped parcel ot lend conalKting of
epp~oximately l.x ecree, locakad on the west side of Miller Street between
Oranqethorpe Avenue and Crowther Boulevardt nncl dcx3e tisreby approve the
Neyativ~o Decler.etion from the requiromesnt t~ prepere en environ~-ental impact
report on the basis th~t there would be nc~ significent individual or
cumuletive edvoree Qnvirorunental impact due to the approvel of thie Neqative
Oec2nration sincR thw 1-nahe~im Generel Plan designates the subject property for
low-nMdium density residential lend use~ aoae~ene~urate with tho proposalt thet
no aenaitive envix-onmental impacts are involved in the proposalr thet the
Initie2 Study eubaiitted by the petitioner indicates no siqnificant .individuel
or cumulative edvarse envirunmentel ia~pactat and thet the Negetive Declaration
substnntietinq the loregoing tindiriqe i~ on file i.n ~he City o! 1lnaheim
Planning I3epartment.
Commiesioner Kinq offered a awtion, seconded by Cc~aiaBioner Bouas and MOTI4N
C1~RRIED (Commissioner Aarnea abeent) thet the Anaheim City P:nnning Comaiiaeion
doee hereby grnnt the requeat fc~r weiver o! code requir~a~e~t on the basia af
the unusual shape of eubject property and the locntion of the siqns relative
t~ surroundings.
Coauaieaioner King affered Resolutinn No. PC 82-136 and m~ued for its passeqe
..nd adoption that the 1-naheim City Plnnning Cotemniseion daes hereby qrent
Conditionel Use Parmit Na. 2352, eubject to the e~ipulation of the petitioner
at the public hearinq that the aise of the billboa:ds shell b+: no 1ergRr then
72 aquare leut eact~, and subject ta Interdapartmental CcmnRitt.pe
Aecommendetions.
On roll c+~'1, the foregoinq resolution vraa pas~aed by the following vote:
11Y88: CUMMI88IONSRB: BW118, SU8110RE, PRY, E{$ABST, ]CING, !IC BURNEY
I~OgS: C~MM288IONERB: NOt~iB
ABSBKP: Cd~QMIBSZOtId~RS: 8J-Rl~1L~8
Jack Mhite, Asnistant City l~ttorney, preaented the written riqht to appesl the
Plannir~q Como~i~afan's decieioa within 22 dey~ to the City Council.
7'/12/82
s. a ~ .~~
MINtlTtB l1NAH=IM CITY PLI1NNIti(i COMMISSYI~N, July 1~, 1982 82-356
ITSM N0. 7- EIR C11T~Q4R~C71LLY BXZFII'T - CI.~188 S 7WD VA1t211NC6 N0. 328Q.
Pt18LIC NEIIRING. Of~MaR: CHl1RI.E8 R71Y 11ND BARA1-R11 11NN FiTL1tY, 833 South Hilde
Street, Anah~in~, CA 92806. Pxoperty dascri~+d a• a rectanqulerly-ahaped
parcel o! land consietinq of approxitnatoly 720Q square leat, locsted at the
northwedt aorner of JRmi~on 8tr~et end Hilda Street (833 BouGh Nilde Strmet.)
V11R2l1NCB RaQU38T: W11IV~R OF MINIMUM BID~XIIRD SE'I'BACK TO CONSTRUCT 11 GRLENHOUSE
Th~r~ was n~ one indiceting their prasence in oppo4leion to subject roquest
nnd alth~uqh ~he ste~f° rfport to the Planninq Canmiselon was not read at the
public heerinq, !L ie reforred to end nmde a pert o! the minutea.
Charlas Wiley, owner, we~~ pzeeent tU answeer any quaetions.
THE PUALIC HS7IRING W118 CLOSED.
Commies~aner Herbst aaked whdt type of ine~kc~rial will bd used in the
constructinn of thi.s qreenhouae.
Mr. Wilay explained it wi11 be filan "Solar-Gro" cleer panela end will loak
like glns~s• koupc~nding to CoaimSesionar Herbet, he expleined the qreenhouee
cauld be eaeily diementlad.
Coamaiseioner Bushore egked ~! Any other type buildinq could t~e con~trucked on
rh~a property since the vnrlence goes with the land itselt. Dnan Shezer,
11eei~stenL Planner, explained approval would be !or the plens before thA
Counnission anly and any o~her buildinq would not b~ all~~wed.
It Nae not~d the plAnninq Director ar his suthorited rapresentative hse
d~termined thet tha propoaed p~roject lells within the delinition of
Categorical Exem~~iona, Clene 5, as defin~d in tha State Enviroroaental impact
Repoxt Guidelinee and is, theretore, categorically exempt from the requir.ament
to prepar• an EIR.
ACTION: Caouaissioner King oftered Resolution No. PC82•-137 en~i ~noved for its
p~ as6 ~~nd adoption that the 1-nah~eim City Plnnning Co~rnissic+n does fiereby
qrant Veriance No. 3280 on the basis of the lccation of the qreenhou4e
reletive to its earroundinqs end subject to Interdepartmental Comcaittee
Recaamandationa.
On roll call, the loregoing reeolution was pAOSed by the followinq vpte:
AYBSs CA~MI$SIONERSt 80U1-8, BU3FiORE, FRX, HBRBST, 1CINC. MC HURNEY
NOEBs GOl~I.I88IONffiRRs KONB
J-ggENT: COl~WI88IONERB s A71RN1E8
Jack fihit~, ~-saietant City l~ttornsy, presanted the written riqht to appeal the
Planning Commission's cleci~lon erithin 22 dnys to th• Cl.ty Ceuncil..
7/12/82
_
_ ..w:.c,..,ri.~.~.,,~-~...~..~..~...w.,~..~.r_.~~..._..~, ~.,...,...~.,.~,~..-,~...~~,~..,~m~,.... ..~.,~.~....,...,......~,,.~~:~ .,.~.....,....».~~,..,..~.~
~"~
MINUTtB 11NA(tEIM CITY PL11N1~1ING GOlWI8820N, .1uly 12, 1982 A2-357
ITEM N0. 8- EIR C11T1DOORICALLY 1lX6M(i'T ' C~.i-8& 5 11ND VI-RIMICE NO. 3281.
~.
~'w~
t-UBLIC H]lJ1RIN0. OH[~1~R~ J11C1C P. NIL80Nr JR• 11N0 MA Y 1-NN E. WILBON, 4119 Beet
Mapla Tr~~ DrivA, Anaheim, Cl- 92807. Prop~rty de~cribed as an
irreqularly-~hapsd parcal o! lanQ conaist.ing of epproxia-~tely 0.31 aare,
havinq e lront~qe ot approximekaly 65 leat on the north~ett •ids o! Maple Trea
Drive~ (4119 Sa~t Maple Tree Drive).
Vl-RIl1NCS itmQUE~R'= Waivor af minimum sideyerd •etl~ack to constr ict an addition
to a single-lamily raeidence•
Thore wae no one indicatinq Cheir pr~eena~+ in oppoeition to eubject r~queet
and althouqh tha atef! report to tl~~ Plenning Coaunission was not ree~ et the
public hearing, it i~s referr~d to end made s part of. the minutea.
~aak Wileon, nwnar, enplained he hed discaneed this pxol~ael with hia
n~iqhbors dnd they ara aqrmsable.
THE PUBLIC H811RING WJ1S CLOSEQ.
It was nnted t:.e Planninq pirectar of hie euthozized represent.etive hea
detariained that the proposed project falls within the definition ot
Ca~tegorical 6~ce~aptions. Clans ''i, ea delined in the State 8nvironmental Impe+ct
R~port Guidelines snd is, therefore, categorically ~xampt from the requirewent
to prepare an SIR.
ACTIONs Co~missioner Herbat offered Rseolution Wo. PC82-138 and cwved !or ita
paesag~ and adoption that the Aneheim City Planning Coma-lasion does hereby
qrant Ve~lanee No. 3281 on the ba~ir~ thet the raquest ia mini~al t~nci subject
to Intrerdepnrtmental Coma~ittee Itecoauaend~tions.
On xoll call, the foregoinq reeolutiQn was paesed by the Pollowing vot~:
AY88s C(7MI~lISBTAQE}1S: BOU718~ HU5HOit8, FitY. HEASSTr KItiG. MC SU}a1EY
NQE$s CQNlMISSIOlJER3: NONE
1-ggEtt'P: Cf~It+lISBZONERB: BARNSS
~~ACk White, Aeafstnnt City I~ttorney. pzesanted the writt4n right ta appeal the
Plenning Cocaisaion's decieion within 22 d~ys to the City Council.
ITEM ~O. ~-$; R NEGaTIVE DECLAMT~ON, W112VER OF ~ODS R1~UIREMIENT 11ND
CONDYTIOr11-L Ui58 PBRMIT NA. x347.
FUBLIC ttEl-RING. OifltBR: CALVIIRY H111''PIBT CHtJRCH OF 71N11HSIM, 2780 Be$t Waqner
J~vanue~ l~nsheisa, r1- 9280b. pr~perty desarlbdd aa an irrequlerly-~sheped
~arcel of l,a-nd canaletinq a~ +~ppxoxin+ately 1.93 ecre~ located et th~e southerly
t~rminus aP Rio Vistn StraeC, Z780 Esst Naqner Avenue (Calvary Ba~tiat Churah
o! 1-naheim• )
Tlsere were approximetely ~eight pereone indicatinq theiz prsaence in op.position
to s~ubject za~quest and although the stalt raport to tha plannin~g Comaiissioa
wa~ not read e~ tha public h~aring. it is relerrRd to and aaade a part of the
a~inutas .
7/lZ/82
~. `
MINUTSB 11N11HltIM CITY PI.~INNING COMMt88IQN, July 12, 198Z 82-35d
Ps~tar Jim Dunne, C~lv~ry 8~ptia~ Church, ~tated they w~nt to axp4nd tl~eir
Christian •dua~tien op~r~tion and edd aAditionel qreder to have kind~rqsrtsn
throuqh tv-elfth grsde. N• utatec! hs has be~n peator at thie church for eix
aionth~ and ~sveral ydars ego the previoua pei~tor made applicetion to permit
rxpansion o! e church complex to include a pzive~e Achool and pre-school, but
sino~ thet time, the church hs• acquired Additionel property end has nearly
caapl~tsd con~truction of their educati~n buildinq.
Doneld J. Roush, 994 S. M~rjan Street, llneheim, steCed ha hes coma to the
Planninq Commis~lon mestlnqa in the p~et end thouqht they hed thie project
stopped. He r~ad e latt,er frae hie neiqhbdr, Joe Lamai, 999 S. Mnrjan, who
could not ett~nd ee lollowsi
"llnah~lm Planning Commie~inn~
Approxiatately 4 yenrs ega we responded to Cnlvary Aaptist Church'e request
to expnnd for school puz•poeee. Wr. wero aqeinet it then, enA we ere
ageinet it now.
My wil~e ia bedridden with Multiple Sclerosls, and does not need ~ny eddad
aqgrevations. The noiee qeneratad by children ao clo~e to our property
would b~e dekrimental to my w.ife.
We ere detiniCely not againat kids. We reined three in our ~reeent
house. We are aqainat kidn in the wrang plecet and the church property ie
the wronq plece !~r e achool.
i elso think parkinq would become a problem with any churr.h function. Z
,personally took e count of vehicle• Su~dey July 11, 1982 at the morninq
eervice. There were Z1 caza perked on Waqner, 14 garked in front of the
church and drivewey, end the beck parking l~t hed 39 cars~ 5 bueee, end
one church ven.
My wi~e and Z nre ageinst waiver on pazking, anci/or a echool on the
property behind us (Calvary Saptist Chuxch)."
Mr. Aoush etAted ho real.izee anyona hae the riqht to make 8 requeet hefore the
Planning Coamission, but he t.houqht it was Mrong for all theee people to ha~ve
to tak~e tia-e off work end come to theee meetinq~.
John Stanley, 2?76 Mavarick, Anaheim, preeented e letter froa his neighbor,
Norman Pred, aho cannot ettmnd th~ n~e4tinq, and etated the letter pointa out
that tr.atfic created by hiqh school studenta wuuld b~ a problem and ret~rred
to Che current situetion wi~h atudenta ~roa- Katalle Hiqh 8chool.
Mr. Rou~h atated he did not think this neiqhborhood could accoa~a~c~dete tvo high
schools w1~th younq p~op2e driving in the erea. He e~ated he has come @o+m
hsre quite olten and lee2s thie church ha~ probebly bsen built on varianc~s
which were corte~eted ~y Che neighbora and he lelt it is tia~ tha~a verianc,ea
are stnpped.
Tiaa Rardy, 998 1laraan, preeented photographa of the perking situstion laaC
Sunday, anA o! the tive white buse~ he sees trom his backyard. He stated he
hus not ~iv~ t,h~-re very lonq, but when he mov~d thMra, nai.qhbor~ told them
about the church, but thought it. Maa •dttled that ther• v~uld not be ~nykhinq
7/13/82
MlxM1TS8 1-t~U11RIM CITY PIJ1MiIN(3 COMMISSIOti, July 12, 1982 82-359
alsa devslop~d th~r~, •o th~y w~ra ~urpri~ed wh~n thAy raceiwd Chi• notiae.
Ha •tet~d ther~ is enough noi~e and traltic conqestion end thay hopa thie
r~q~est will not b~ apQruv~d.
Phyllit 111onqi, 972 8. Msrj~n, presented phokAqraph~ of har beck ysrd end
•t~hed they ~how the close proxi~nity of the church'o racceetion hall and m~in
church buildinq ko thair yard. She edded eaveral yoars ago the church aqreed
t~ plent traas and ahrubo, Dut heve never coa-plf.ed and they have no privecy in
~i;eir back yardo. 8he etated the children throw thinqs over the lance and
hanq over the fence end climb in the treee. She steted her neiqhbor could not
qet off work to attend thie merting, but ehe nas e large dog which the
children te~~e e lot en~9 ehe hee f~ed tu go out e~~~3 meke tham stop, and slso Rhe thought
thet they tease her dog now that ~ho is n~ longer at :.~7me d~irinq tl~e dey. Sh•
stated eha~ did not think they could rontrol 300 stndente eince they cen't
cantrol the onee th~y have naw.
Ma. 11:onqi atated aeverel year.e eqo, the church wes given permiseion to have a
pre-ochool only, but they have b~aen registerinq let and 2nd grac~e etudents.
She etated another problem haa been noiaet thet thir morninq they aet up a
wnding pool between the two buildingR Aireckly behind her back yarc] ebc~ut 10
or 1S teet wway.
Concerning parking, Me. Alonqi steted ehe worke and qets home betwren 6:30 and
7s00 in the evening and aometimes hea to perk down the atreet end walk.
PaaCor Dunne eta~ed he ie mildly eurprisedF however, he believen thay hnve e
taandete which includes a mi.nistry of ed»c4tion and they conRider everything
they do an axtenaion of tt-eir nLL n.ietry and believe it le part af thetr
responsibility to provide Christian education nnd thet he und~ratood ecquirinq
additionel lend would rectily the concerne which cauaed the previoue denial.
THE PUBLIC HEIIRING W118 CLOSED.
Dean Sherer, Aasistant Planner, explained the oriqiiiel Conditional Uee Permit
No. 952 aas approved in July 1967 to eeteblish a church and Sunday School and
permit uae of nn eyciating reeidencR ns e personaqet and thst Conditional U~P
Permit No. 1183 waa approved ln June 1970 by t.he Planntng Ccxionia~ion to pRrc:it
expansion of an er.ietinq church complex to include a d20-seet sanctusry ~nd
pre-school nuxsery with waiver of maxintum permittad buildinq heightt hor+ever,
an applicattan wes subatitted in Navember 1976 to permit expanaion of a church
complex to include e privdte acho~l and p~ce-~chool and thet request was danied.
Coamie8loner Herbat claritied the requent in i976 wan !or 140 students and
thi: request is for 300 studente. He addad it eppeare the church hes noC been
a good neighbort that tha whole church property backe up to 9 ha~-es and the
churah hae not considered th~e peece, health, ~sfety and aeltara o! the people
who resida in thQOe home~. He agreed a church hae the right to do certa3n
things, but doe~ not have the riqht to intertere in other psople's lives~ that
riqht now 140 atudente are botherinq the neiqhbors and the church i~
considarinq doubl~nq thet nwo,bert ~hat thare ia n~~ adsquate playground azea
for that number o! children without usinq the parkiaq 1nL. He statad ~unlass
th~ patition~r cesi cam~ up vrith ~aamethinq that sho~+~ proper screening and
proper pleyground area, ha coul~ nat vote tor approval. He clxriliad that the
ehurch hae not canplied wilh the co~ditions of the oriqinal psra~it.
~ i~ ~ iae
~ ~: :~ } ~~
MINUTEB 71N11HBIM CI'Y'Y PL1INI~IING COMMI88ION, July 12, 19H2 82-360
Camnis~loner King reterr~ad to tha Tretfic lfigl.near's cnncarn rege~rdinq the
additional drivsway on Weqnar to provide ~ vel~icle loadinq end unloading arRa
!or chil.dran et the lront o! the church focility.
Pastor Dunne rsapondad thay unlaed bus~a in the perking lot behind tha
church. He Rtated this tekes him by eurpriset thet when he b~came pa~tor, the
buildinq was elroecfy under conetructi~n eo at wes obvinusly in the plen to
expend the ministry of educetion. He stato~9 he hae dincussed thiu with the
Rtatt in the City o! 1lnehaim, enQ had indicsCad that thR addltional property
had be~e:~ ecquired end thet the church MO• vnry near ccrtnpletion of a 9,000
equere foot iruildinq to provide additionel tacilities, end slso [heir deaire
to expend by adding ona qracle per year wae diecusded t~nd he uncSeratood trom
stalf t.hat thay lelt the probleme would be reoolved. Ne eteted it is hie
etrong ctesire to have qood relationshipe with the neiqhbozu end he wae totelly
unswere of thia eituetion and wl.11 do everythiny to rectify it.
Commissioner Buehore eteted the church har nnt b~nRn d qooA neighbor and has
not provided the treee, etc.t thet C(1p 1183 wae grnnt.ed .in :970, 12 year~ eqo,
and tho church is presenCly gettinq oppos~tion becauam they heve overlooked
one of tho baeic premie~e of being a c;ood neiqhbc~zt thet tneybe they ahould go
bnck and plent the trees and provids adequete p~~rkinq bereuse thero is no
reaeon these neighbors should hava to perk on the etreet, and pointed out they
are currently in violation of thoir original permit er.d i.t ie in jeopardy and
could bu zevoked. '+~e referr.ed Lo Lhe lady'e coaqnents reqerdinq the w~dinq
pool and atated it is the little thinge thet meke the diPfere~ce.
Coaia-iaaioner Bouas nsked i! the hl.gh schoal. studente will be a].lowed to drive
vehiclee to echool, realizing it will be a few years befora tho achool ie
operating a high schoc~l, or whether or not the a~•~~lente will be bused.
Pset~r Dunne replied they do not run n~-y buses for the achool at thie time end
do nat anticipate having hus ~ervicR.
Coa~a-issioner Herbst staCed he did :~ot feel the plans are adequete and they
need to show what ia really qoinc to be done, such as, will the parking lot be
used !or a ple7qzound, etc., anti Khet type of trees will be planted, end also
the driver+ay, and whether or not the old hc-use will k~e ramoved, nutinq if ihe
house is reawved, odditionel parking spaces could be provided, Qaeaibly
bsinging the proposal cloe~sr to code.
Caaaa~aeioner King sta-ted if tt-e church hed complied with the original
conditione and provided adequate parking, they would not be experiencing this
oppositio~ now. Co~mies.ionar Herbet added he felt the whole problem ii
overbuilding the •ite and the satiafnction of th~ neighbora~ ~'~et the church
haa had at l~ast 12 yearR of bad ralatiorte end now they are requeetinq e~n
expanded proje~t anc~ haven't done snythinq ta alleviete the problea~s of the
previoue y~er~s.
Pastar Dunne atated he waa under the iagrersion that he hsd done everything to
alleviate the problemat that thd church has qone to an axpen~R nf elwut ~1/2
eailllon and if they need to plant eoaae trsas, they certeinly are willirq to
co~ply. He statecl he ha~ con~ulted with the city etaf! snd nothing waQ said
about~ the neiqhboxs an~ not ona neighbor has coeews to him with a problem end he
ha~ had na idea th~1c the church ra• causinq a probl~ for the nciqhbor~.
7/12/82
~
MINUTBS 71N71HSIM CIT'Y PI.i1NNItiG COMMI88ION, July 12, 1982 82-361
Cc~amiesionsr Harbst stet~d he would like to se• mar~ coa~p:.eta plan~ and
moditication to the plens t4 rsctity the probl~ms with th~~ neighbore, mnd i~
• e Khola parkinq lot is qoinq t~ ba used far a playqr.ound, thnt •hould be
ahown. He stated he would like to see r~vised plen• ahoM~ing the sdditi~nal
perking end dri.veway and what is going tc~ be planted. H~~ ~uqgested the
petiti.oner req~uest a continuance in order to eubrt-it ravi~ed plann.
Pagtox Dunne iitated they will do everything they cen an~l will certeinly eak
thoir tnea~ra to park in the parkinq lnt, but would havs no cnntsol over the v.isitors
which makes up about 1/3 of th~± congrec7ation. He stated th~ir additional
playground N•111 be the perking lot and ~het he hed und~retood thet would be
acceeptablAt snd thet they will plant nny kind of trees required. Ne added he
did not knor~ what purpose a continuance wc~uld eerve.
Conm~isalonE,r Herbat felt a continuence woul.d give the ~~etitioner an
~pportunit~y to work with the neiqhbore to reaolve those problems diecuseed.
Ccxamieelon~er Bushore et~ted offaring the p0titionrr e chance to work with hie
neiqhriora and eutxnit revised plene might be misl~eadinaJ~ indicating he wea not
nura he would vote for nppzoval to ellow 30Q st+ldents at this tacility,aven
with more catnplete plann.
Coeimiasioner Herbet steted he could not vote in favar of it with this e~et of
plans.
Coamiisaioner Bushore eeked what the building peneite wcsre approved ~or for the
new conetruction. Uenn Sharer replied he believod that was eppraved nbout
1-1/2 yeara nqo under CUP 1138 to be used only for pre-echool and aince thet
time tha other gzade levels have been adde9 and he did not think etafP or the
city knr~w thet it we~ to be used tor a echool.
Comtniseioner Bushore atated it almost aounds like the ehurch t~pending ~1/2
million rraa done delibernte'ly to put the Plnnninq Coom~.ission and City in a
difficult poe~ition. He etstod he did not know i! a co~pler.e set o! revise.d
plans would mak~ a diff~rence in hi~ vata becau~e he did not think the pairkinq
and playgzound area are Adequate.
R+eapondinq to Cc~oiseioner Bc~u~e, Pestor Dunne explair~ed they heve enrolled
aix otudente !or the new years thst they have not be~n pronatinq the hiqher
grades end have been keepinq this rather Iow-keyed unt'1 they knew whether or
nht thie would be approved.
C~smttsaloner Buehora s~uqqeeted the operation be!.nq kept for primdry studenta
(gradeo 1-3) only fer thr~e yesrs and that they' ehould try to clean up their
act and then ask tor an ~expansion in khe tutuce.
Pastor Dunne steted ~hey could nAt live wit.h grades 1 throuyh 3t the~ if they
enroll ~tudenta in the lat qrade, they hove !.o be eble to tell them that Chere
will be hiqhar gradae.
Caamiasiorcez Buahare stated stati~ticg show that an dverage California f~mily
mowe av~ry 5 y~aars.
~~iz~ez
~ ;
MINUTE.S 11N11HEIM CITX PLl-NNING COMMI88ION, July :2, 1982 82-362
Conanis~ionar Xing agre~d with Commiseioner Herbat that revieed plens ehould be
eubeaittee.
Commim~ianar Bushore sugg~atad the paetor uMet with tha neighbora aince he wAe
not awar~ o! the pxoblsm pr~viouslyt thet ha hae hserd thet scraening would
help rasolve aame o! the prorlami, and ougqested cor,oideration be given tc
reducing the nwnber o! gredes to poeRl~ly 5.
Paetor punne ateted they have had ove~r 300 people thare for Sundey eervicen
and have had edequeto apace without the 9000 equere feet and thet !e the
reaaon they have purchaeQd edditinnel land to erect the y,00Q-equare foot
claeer.oan buildi.ngt end that by the time it ie completed, tlieir church and
school fecility would rompare witn any in Bouthern Cdlitornia. He etated he
can understend the aituetio~ with the neighbore end they will plent the treea,
but feel they heve an ~bligation to beqin e Christinn echool.
Curtunieeioner tierbet ot.ated the chnrch aleo hae en obliqation to the ngighbors
and if the Paetor doea not ~~ant a continuance, he will move on this requeet.
11CTIUN: Commiseionor Nezba~ offered e mc~tion, eeconded by Commissioner King
nnd MU'PION CARRIED (~ocpniseioner Bnrnes absent) thet the Anaheim City Plenning
Commisaion hae reviewe<1 the propocal to retnin and expend ~n exiating privete
day school (gredes 1-12) with a meximum enrollment ot 300 children with waiver
of eainimum nun~ber ot` parking apacee on an irregularly-sheped parcel of lend
consisting o~ approximately 1.93 ecrea loceted et the so~therly terminus of
Rio Vteta Btreet f27d0 Eaet Weqner ]lvenue (Calvery Beptiat Ct~urch of
Anaheim))tand da!e hereby approve ttie Negative Declaretion tzom thr
requirement to prepere an environment~l impact roport on the basis thet there
woi~ld be no siqniticant individual or cumulative ndverae environmente~ impeat
duo t~ the approval of this Negat~.ve [~claration since the 1-naheim Generel
Plan designetes tha subj~ct property for low-density residentfal land usAs
commensurate with the proposelr that no aoneitive ~anviranmantel impacts are
involved in the proposelr that thH Initiol Study s~ibmitted by Che petitioner
indicatee no significnnt individual or cumulntive adveree environmentel
impectot +~nd that the Negative Declaration substnntiatinq the forequinq
findinqs ie on ~ile in the City o! Anahei.oi Plenning Department.
Conu.nieeioner Herbat otfered a mntion~. aeconded by Camenisaion~er Buahore and
MOTION CJiRRIED (Coaaaiseioner P inea abaent) thst tha Jlnaheim Planning
Caam~iesion doea hereby deny ci~e request for weiver of code rec{uireraent an the
banie that no apecial circt~etancer were deu~natrated applicable to the
property incluciing ai~e, ehape, topoqraphy, lxation ar surroundi.nqa, which do
not epply to other property under identical zoning clasaitication in the
vicinity.
7/12/82
f.
i
MINU1'ES 1-NJIHI~IM CITX PLANN':Nti COMM1288ION, July 12, 1982 82-363
Coaimiseioner Nerbst otlwrad Reeolution No. PC82-].39 anA moved Por it~ pe~saga
end AdopLion thet th~ 1lnsneim City Planninq Commiseion doee heraby dsny
Candition~l U~e Permtt N~~. 2]A7 on ths baeia that the existing u4e hss been
under L•he church's aonLrol eince 1970 and khay have not lived up to tha
epnditions o! tl~e oriqi~lal conditional uso permit snd heve cr.aated probl.eme
pertaining to noiee, ti~a~lic congeetion, ~nd parking in tha Aurroundi.ng
ra~idential noighbarti~~dJ and that the parkinq end playground ar~e propoeed
!or the expansion er• not adequeta to sccomoaodate the number of studente
rropc~eedt nnd on the baeia thet the propoeed ue• will advereely atfect the
ed~oining la~nd um4s nnd tho qzowth enA developnent o! ~he erea in ahich it ie
pro~osed to be locatedt that the crAFfic generated by tF~e propoead use will
impoee an undue bur~len upon tho streete and hiqhwaya de~iqned and improved to
carry the tret~ic in tfie areet encl thnt the ~rentinq o! the pron~ ed use will
be detrimontal to ~che peace, heelth, eefAty and qa-neral welfere of the
citiaens of the Ci.ty ot 1-naheim.
On roll cell, th~, ~orayoinq resolution wae ~aeed by the tollowinq votes
11YES: COMMII3l3IONERB: HQUAS, BUSHOItI:, FRY, HEitBST, KING, MC BURNEY
NOE& s CCN-Q+II9$ZONElt3 s NONE
ABSEl~'P: COMMI'~5IONERS: BARNE3
Jeck White, Aasistant City Attorney, presented tFe written riqht to eppe~al the
Planninq Conm~ie-eion'e deciaion within 22 dnys to thP City Cow~cit.
iTEM NO. 10. EZR NSGATYVE DECi,ARATiUN, wAiVER OF rODS REQUIRF.~IENT 1WD
CONOITION~L. U8~ PSRM7T NO. Z353.
PUSLIC H81+RZNG. CIWNER: RICHI-RD SHARKEY, 1530 Wer~t t.incoln Avonue, Suite 201,
Anaheim, CA 92801. AGENT: 1~RNULIP(1 GW1N11DOS, 1146 Roxewr~~, Santa And, C71
92707. Property deacribed as a rectangularly-sheped perc~l af lsnd conristinq
of appr.oximately .~ ncre, havin9 a frontage of approximately 200 leet on the
nozth side of La Palma (1272-1739 West La Palma 1-ven~ue).
CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST: To permit u cockteil loun~e in the CL (Coma~ercial,
Lia-ited) Zone with waiver oi minimwa numbor of parking epacee.
ThQre were epproximately four pereon~ indiceting their preaenca in opposl~lon
to aubject r~quen*_ and elthdugfi the stat! report to tha Planninq Conm~issfon
was not road nt the gublic hear.inq, it is reterred to end mede +~ pert of the
sninutes.
Richard Sharkey, cs~mer, skated a local bueineasmen in the Redevelnpnent 1~rea
eonteeted hitn bscause he ie being forcad to nave fraa the erear that aecoxding
to stotf's evaluation in the atatf report, tharh sppeare ko be t~o problems
v-ith the proposed locations ona is perkinq and the other ia the proximity to
the multi-tnmil.y raaidential unies which ar~ directly b~hind tha all.eyr that
they wottild agree kha aharsd a12ey accees between patrons of the cocktail
lounqe and the multiple-lamily uaits uwy reau~t in noi4a, Lr.alfic and safety
probleu~t and that they wauld aqree to cloae otf +the all~y acc~se, axcept for
e~ee~rqency purposes.
Mr. 8l~arkey stated tha statf rapo.rt iadicates thie is a 3,250-aquare teat
cock~sil lounqe, but the leASe is !or a 2,970-riquar• foot tsv~rn and asked i!
there is a difterarsca betwsen a t~ wrn and a eocktail lounqs aa it psrtsins to
prrkin9 rsquirwats. it vas noted there is nb ditf~rence.
'f /7 1/A'~
~3
MINUTIlB ANl1HEIM CITY PL~-NNIN~+ Cq~IMZ88xpN, July 12, 19p2 82-36~1
Juanite TechviqAi, nctinq s• intrepretor tor J1rn~~lfo Gr~nados, prespective
bueineea oan4r, stat~d thi~ bueinese has to relocAte beceuse of reAc+vel.oprnentt
that he has b~en given a 90-dey notic~ and S.t hee expired and it i~ very
urqent thet thie matter bo re~olved. She edded he is nware o! exietinq
prabl~tna. Sh~ r.eF~lied to Chairn-an Fry th~t he hae been at hie preaAnt lxation
!or :ive yenrs.
Mr. John Joye, 1-ttorney, rapre~entinq the ovmar of the 14-unit dpartment
canplex directly north, steted th~re is only a ZO-toot wid• Alley eepereting
tt~ie locetion fr~n t~~eae living unite nnd ihe parking stall.a for the~e unite
r~re o!! the alley end tzeltic coming in and out of the alley for the cockteil
lounqe ~rou~ld be l~etween 10:00 a.m. and 2:00 e.m. and that would obvinusly
interfere with the 14 unite, plua another 30 units in the idanediate Area. He
added they wc~uld quar,tion the apprapriatenose o! a cocktail l~unqe at thie
location beartuee of trefPic problen-s.
Mr. Joye xtated there are elso certaln kindn o! conciuct connected with patrons
df a cocktatl lounge euch aa the occas3onal 8aturday niqht fight, etc., and
did not think thig type uae in en eree utiliaed by femiliee eh~~uld be
permittedi and notod •hat other busineeaee in the erea cloee rt 9 or 10 p.m.
Bob Williems, 26762 Vie ~1 Socerro, S~n Juan Ca.platreno, CA 92675, presented
n written responee which he Pelt aums up his feelinqs an thin reqveat. He
stated he ie a long-~i.nte owner af +~dyacent proporty dnd la a former Anaheim
bueine~sman and oppoaes this requeatt thnt parking ie already n problem dnd he
felt this would be teking ~dvantdqe of the tenents. Ne steter9 the perking
apacea in thet area are elready avert~aed. He edded ~leo the nolae and treffic
would b~ intol.erable !or the tenante. He Atated rhe shortaqe of p~rking
spaces would create ~dditionel perking prableme in front o! the other
busineeees who rely heevil} on a fast turn-around of perking ap+~cee. He added
a tormer Cenant of aubject property had f~r tno many employeea and too much
traffic und sinae there were no ber.rier~ l~otw~een his property and eubject
property, people were const~ntly perkinq on hi~ property and he had to reaort
to hnvinq cers towed ewey.
Mr. Willia-a~s etated in hi~ opinian, e cocktelJ lounge 18 not compntible with
the surrounding area, eapecielly because of the cloae proxiiaity to the
residential erea and the Servite High School students walk past the area. He
suqgested beforR a decision ia made, the Planning Com4oisaion ehould
investignte the proposed o~+ner's current location end polire records and talk
to tha neighbora.
Mr. W1211~ma felt there ie e incongiatency i.n the staff report and referred to
tha aize of Ghe facility and numbex of paXking spacea required, indiceting the
sta~f report etated there will be 100 fixdd seets, with only 20 Parkinq agacas
rec~uired end he did not think that would be redsonnble•
Luther Mitchell, 1732 Glen, statad he owrR the 14-unit apartme~t~ that Dan
Rowland, ~-rchitect, deeigned a plaae !or hxm to live 5 yeara a~qo trying to
make this a good plece to live, bu~ the n~ighbozhood i.s qoinq dawnt that the
City Council is being cor~tacted today by the homeownex~s !.n the area asking !or
hslp to pravent thie nrea lrom bscoeainq a ghetto, and new a cocktail lou.~ge is
baing request~sdt thet he renta to 14 lamiliee, and some of tham go to work at
5 a.m., ard would only liva 50 ~eet from this building a~td tha loud music lraa
the cockteil lounqe wauld di~turb their sl~ep.
7/i2/82
MINUT88 ~1NAN1iIM CITY PWNNxfiti COMMI88IdN, July 12, 198Z 81-3b5
Mr. MiCchell r~aterred ta e peti~ion he hwd ~ubaitted to the Planninq
Dep~rtmsnt l~st week containinq eiqnatur~s o! 40 resiQ~nts end bu~l.nessmen in
ths ere• who are concernod by khi~ requeat. He steted he ie plaeding with the
Pl~nninq Cc~arni~aion ~~ help them meks thiu a batt~r plece end he leit. thie
would hurt the ~ree. He etated thRrd i• crlme in the area now enA the Police
and Fire Department ar+~ ~.~~ere [r~quently.
Keikh Mizutani, Manaqer for Tanny, etated he ie not repreee~ting eny other
buaine~oeo in the er~e, hut wee surr. mc~s~ of th~en leel the •ame way. He
etetRd th~y do not want to heve to be burden~+d wi.th heving to hire a eacur ity
service during the niqht to make aura criminel ections do not teke plece, such
ae vendeltem, burglariea, dr~~gs, etc.t that thepe emell bueineeemen ~r~ not
ablo to provide this type eecucity liko e lr,rqe+ cnrporation csn, so this would
be an additic~r-el bu: den on tho P~lice Depertment.
Mr. Mituteni eteted about 1-1/2 yoe+rs eqo en amusemc~t arcac'.e wea pro~sed for
thia eree andmo~t of t1i~ buaineee penple felt thet wou7~i not be appropr.tdte
end preferrRd that it not b~e e1lor+ed, :~ut a b,nr s~ecne to be more inappropriate
thdn an erced~. Fle istated the ber would be open e~ timea when crime takes
place, +~nd their bu:inrea will n~t be able ta of Pord the expenee of hiring a
security service and they would b~ require3 ta lind dnother locaklor. He
etated thay heve b~eri At thl~ l~cetion for atx~ut 9 or lU yeers.
Chairman Fry nated ~ petition wrae s~ilxnitted conteining epproximetely 37
unconf ~ ~^m~d slyneturea.
Mr. 3herkey stated `~e underetande the probleme thst eriee fran thte type
bur~ineaet that tttiey ayree to K~ ipulate thht the eccesa to Che reer of tha
property will be closed, except for em~rgency purposesr the-t noiee abetement
eo the rer.idents at the rear would not be disturbed w! 11 be their
responsibiiity end t~ey stipulate t~ take whatever atepe are necAeenry. He
added he telt closirlg the ecceas to thr_ alley will nlleviate both the problem
af tratfic nnA nois~.
Mr. St~arkey staCwd Mr. Grando~ is nn excallent busineasa~an and has had no
probleme in the pest and ho hss nqreed in wxiti~q thet should he violete eny
condit.lons, he would iu~nedtately vacate the prmaiees and the leeae r+ould be
t~trmineted.
THS FUSLIC NEARING W71S CL086D.
Reeponding to Coa+miaeionet bushore, t~tr. 5herkey explaiaed the lease is for
fi.vA yedra. Coaoaissioner 8uehore auqqested e p~rr~it foz one year, explaininq
thd matt~r would ~utomatically come up !or review in one year. He edded he
doe,p not lac~k et this locatiors any diff~arent thsn the one on 6Uclid. He asked
it the patikianer : willing to atipulate to leaving tlie rear duo:~a closed
duzinq bueineee ~.ourg. with Kr. Sharkey replyinq the doors would be closed,
except ~or emergencies.
Conroaissionar Herb~t atet~d he is concerned becausa there heve besn paet
prablems ~here coclrtail lounqa+s abutted re~idential arear. He et+~t~~3 unl«sa
theze i~ dra~t;.c cc~ntrol., th• ellay aill. be uawd for ~cce~s end juet tha
emy~l.oyees lwa~ving the area e't 2 a•a• reauld ba a nolae problem tor the
reold~nt~. He statad he f~lt this is a baQ lo+ation !'or this u~e anc! it is no
ditler•a* t.han ~he cn~ juot agproved that is euisting •nd the Conm.ls~ion is
tryinq to clwn up th~ probl~u.
•k; ~~, t
~~.
t
r
MINUTEB 1W11H1~IN CITY PLJINNINCi COMMI882aN, July 12, 198~ 8Z-366
7-CTION~ Caaoais~i~ner H~rb~t o!ler~d ~ motion, e~condrd by CAmo~isaloner King
anc4 M~OTION CARRT6D (Gan~aai~sionar 8arn~s ab~ent ) that ths Aneh~i.m City Planninq
Coma~la~lon he• revi~Med the proporal to p~renit a cackteil lounge in the CI.
(Commtrcial, Limited) aone with w~ivsr nt minimwn number of parking epaces on
A r~ctenqularly-shepad p~rcol o! l~nd conalati.nq of approxiaw tely .6 ecr~,
havinq e lrentage e! app~~x~meitely ~00 leeL• on the north aid• o! Le Palme
Avenue (1727-1739 Wnot I.e Pala-a Avenu~) t~nc! doss hereby ,~pprove the Negetiva
Ddclaration from tha rec~uirsenent to prepere an environmental impect report on
the be~ie thet tharerrould bo na eignificsnt individual er aumuletiv~ advsrao
environm~ntal impact due to the approvsl o! thia Nagetive Der.larntion since
the l~nehe~m Generel Ptan deeignetes the eubject property for qanaral
r.onanarciel land ueee ec.mmen~urate with the proposal,r the• nn eeneitive
onvizonmantel impecte are involved in the propoeelt that thd T.nitial Study
submitted by thR ;etitioner indicates no eignificent individuel or cumuletive
advaree environmentel impertat nnd ~~~~et the Negetive Declaration
eubatentiatinq the fareqoiny fir~~linq~ io on lile in the City o! An3hef.m
Plenning Department~
Camtni$aioner Nerbet offered e motion, seconded by Comtaise~ioner 8oues and
MA'PION CARit2kb (Commiesioner Hern~e aheent) thet the Anaheim City Planninq
Caaa-iaeion does heraby deny the request for weiver ot the cocfe requirement ~n
the besie thet tl~ere ia en exi:iting parking problem in tt,e ~ran and this uoe
would compound the problt~m.
Coauniealoner Herbat offered Reaolution No. PC82-140 and moved fac its paesage
end adnptf.en that tho hnahaim City P~enning CoaanisAion does hareh;• den~
Conditionel Use Permit No. 2353 on the basie that the usr. would cr~ate ndverse
noise end traffic impecte on the ~urrounding reeidential erea w?th nni~e at 2
e.m. whicli would be amplified for residents aleeping tn the area.
On roll call, the foreqoinq reaolution was p+ieoed by the foll.~.wing vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONEpS: BAU1l,S, HUSHORL, ERY, HER83T, ICING, MC BURNEY
NOE.S : COMMI33ION~itS : NONE
A98ENT: COMMISSIONfiRS: BAF~I~IES
Commieeionez Herbat oftereu n maCion, seconded by Coma~ie~ionar King end MO^ION
C1IRRIED (^ommiseionPr Barnee eb~sent) to RECONSYQER THE PREVIOUS MOTION
approving the Neqetive Aeclaration.
Commis~ioner Herbet offered a motion, saconded by Coeania~sioner King and lrlO~:I~N
C11RRZSJ (Commi~sai~ne: 8arnes absent) thwt Ghe Anaheim C1ty Planning Cotnmise.ion
~ae reviewed the propasel co paro~it a cocktnil lounqe in tne CL (Co~-.~ercisl,
Litaited) ~con~ kith wsivar oP minimum num~Les vf parkin~ spa.ces on a
reatangularly-shaped parcel ot :~nd c~nsistinq uf appre.r~ma•.ely .6 acre,
lacated on the north eide o! La Palrae Avenue ;:'13Y-1739 Wo~s La Palma 1lvenue) ~
and doe~e hezeby disepprove the Negative Declaration !z•om the requirement to
prepars an envizor-m~nt~l impact reporL on the beeie that thare would be
signilicaat individual or cumulative edvarae enviror~entel iapacts due to t:~e
approval ot this Negeti~re Declarationr thet Aeneitive environm~ntal impacts
are involved in the prapo~alt that tha Zni'+41 Study •ubmittad by t?ie
petitionez inAicetee siqnitirant tndividv cuaaulative adversa
anvi:onmental ia~actv.
Jack Mt-ita, Msiotant City 71tt~Arney, prwaent~d th• vrltten right to appeal th•
Planning ^no~ission'~ dMCision within 22 day~ to the City Cc.uncil.
~
a i
8Z-367
MII~U'~'~g 11~iJ-1iESM CITY PLANNIi'1G COMMZSSION• July 11, 198Z
ITRM N0• 11 -}~OR'P8 11ND AECOMpR~ND1-TIONS:
A. CONOITIONIIL U8E ptRM~IT NO. 2~2Z - R~Quos~ froa~ Nalt~r tlonq !or
•pproval o! revised plan~ to con~truct ~ 488-s~- Z04518outh Harbor
sCC~tsory u~e~ and on-sal• slcoholic bev~reqe
9auleve.rd.
ACTxONs Commi~sioner Hsrbst olLareQ e awtion~ aecondad by
iaeianar Harnas aLeent )
C p~itnii`ioner King and Moti~n Carried (Coraa~, rove the
that tf~e 11r-ehsien Cit~ planning Commisaion does h~reby ~pp
revised plsne for Conditianal Use p~ avi u~IYZRPPr~edfPlan~thev- to
be in eubatential conformencs with p
B. CONDITIONAL USB ~8~ovaloollepocific~ueetf~r Property~taZ910oLastdLa
~loctranica tor pp
Palme~ Avenue~
AC'~IONi Coam-issio~si 1Cinq otfmsed e nx~cion, saconded by Commissioner
popo s and MOTZON C1IRRIED (Conmi.oei~ner Bnrnea ab~ove' el~ec~ronic
7 l n a h e i m C i t y Planninq Coa~a+isef.an dnee hereby apQ
ec~aaponent eal~s as a specilic use un dor C on 8 l t i o n e l U s e P e z m i t No.
1831.
PUBLIC MBETING 'PO DISCUSS PRdpOB~U 11MISD10MF.NT 'P~ COUE FL1R MABTI.EHOMB PHRK2;•
P-nnika Santalahti- Maiatnnt Diractor faz Zoninq, nated th~ propoaed ordinnnce
!or mobilehoa~e park~ is zeady for Plann~ny Ca-ronisdion review end suqgested an
evaninq eaeeting follorring the requler n-'et.ing o! en9~~~ coneensusaof'the p•~•
at the 8raokhuret Coam+unity Center. it was the q
Planning Caamiosion that Chis deta and place iA acceptable.•
ADJOURtiKENT ~
There beinq no further busineAS, the meeting was ad jour.ned at 3: 35 p.m.
R~epecttully eubmitted,
i ~ .
Q~l.~
Edith L. Harris. 3ecrstarY
I-n~hei~ ~itY Planning Commiseion
7/12/82
~' ':
= r:;,_ .-,'+
r-
,.
C
.~