Minutes-PC 1982/08/23~~'
R~f3[TI,AR MEETING O!' TH! ANAHEiM CITY PLIINNING GW41I88ION
it~GUIJ-R MEBTING The reqular meoting of the Anaheim City Plenning Coaimiesion
wae cullsd to erde•: by Cheirmen P'ry et 10:00 a.m., 1-ugu~t
23, 1982, in the~ f.~unci.l Chember, e quorum bainq preeent
end the Cocimi~aic,n reviewed }~lena c~~ the iteme on tod~y'a
eqendn.
pREBSNT Chnirmans Fry
Commiseionare: Boune, Bushore, King, t,a Cleire, McBurney
Ag~~ Cammiesioners: Herbst
ALSA PRESENT Mn~.ke Santelehti Aegi~tent DirACtor for Zoning
Jeck White Asaintant City Attorney
Jay iitus Office Engineer
Peul Sinqer Traf~'i.c Engineex'
pean Sherer Aesl.etnnt Pl~nner
Edith Harrie Plnr-ni~q Commioeion Secretary
PLEDGE OF AI.LEGIANCE TO THE ~LAG LED BY: Cheirman Fxy
APPROVAL OF MINIJTESs Commiasinner King offeced a motion, aeconded by
Commissioner Aouae and MOTION CARRZED, that the minutes of the meeting of
Auquet 9, 1982, be approved as suhtaitt~d.
ITEMI NO. ls EIR N0. 253, RECLASSIFIGATYON NO. 82-83-4, WAIV~R OF CODE
RIDQUIR~MENT ANA CONAITIONAL USE YERMIT N0. 7.362
PUHLIC HEARING. OWNER: ALSERT HORCHARD & KENNL'I'H L. LAR30N, 5915 Burchard
Avenue, Loe Angelea, CA 90034, and ROY W. MAB~F., 2651 W. Lincoln Avenue,
Anaheim, CA 92801. 11G8NT: GFELLER DEVEI.OPMh"N'T COK?ANY, INC., 228 W. Main
Street, Tuatin, CA 92680, Attn: Bob Reeae. Property ~a described as a
rectangularly-ahaped percol of lax~d coneisting of approximately 29.57 acres,
2925 W. Lincoln Avenue (Lincoln Heach Mob11e Manor Perk).
Reclessification requeat: RM-i200, CL and RS-A-43,OQ0 to RM-1000.
Conditional Use requeet: To permit a 810-unit, 38-foot high condotninium
caaaplex with waivera of: a) required lot frontaqe, b) tninimum floor area, c)
minimum landscaped setback, d) minimum recreetional-leiaure area, e? minimum
distdnce between buildings, !) n~inimum nwaber, type and dimensiona of parking
speces and g) minimum diatnnce from parking spaces to dwpsllinq unita.
Continued from the meating of July 26, 1982.
ACTION: Con~nissioner Bouae offered a motion, ,seconded by Coumn.i.ss~oner
McBurney ~nd MOTION CARRIED (Commieaioner Eierbet absent), that coneideration
At th~ nforecaentianea item be continued to the regul.arly-scheduled caeetinq of
8eptember 20, 1982, as requeeted by petitioner.
82-249
~'
MINUTEB, 11N1-N~IM CZTY PLANNING COMMISSION, 1luguot 23, 1982 82-450
IT~M NO. 2: SIR N301-TIV"~c DSCLJ-R1ITION kTV'"LJ498I1~IC11TION N0. 82-83-6, W1IIVSR OF
CODS RIDQUZREMENT 11Nr0 ,CONDITIOlil-1. OGE_ PBWAIT NO. 2363
pUELIC HEARxN(3. C~iNtR~ J086PN 8. EflW1-RDSr 3"P AL~ 1237 S. Euclid Avenua,
1lneheim, Cl~ 92802. AC6NT~ ROH6R: AND D/-PNNlC WRI88, 1608 9uena Vista,
l~neheim, C7~ 92802. Property deecribed ae e rectanqulazly-nhspea parc~l o~
l+~nd consistinq of epproximetaly 6Q00 ~quare teet locet~d at the eoutheeat
corner o! Swnac Lane and Ruclid Stre~t, 1694 W. 8unwwc Lane.
RoclnssilicaCion requaat: RS-7200 to CL
Conditionel Uee reqaeet: Ta parmit the~ commercisl uee o! a reeidentisl
structure with waive+re of minimum number o! perking specae and requir~d
locatian of pnrking spe-cee.
Theru was n~ one indicnting their preeence in uppesition tn Aubject requeet
nnd alkhouyh the ateff report to the Planning Commissian wes nat read et the
Qublic hearing, it is reterred to and cna~.e a part of the minutes.
ltobert iteir nqent, expl+~ined the requeet
W. Sumac La. to be operoted by hie wife.
neiqhbora and they were tavorablet an~i that
reeidentinl purposes beaauae of thr treffic
to reatrict the uso to a knit shap•
ia for 4 retni.l knit ehop et 1694
He expleined he cor-tacted the
the houne cannc~t be rented for
noiae• He stntr.d they would aqree
THE PUHLIC NEl-RING WAS CL09ED.
Respanding to Cammisaioner McBurney, Mr. Weiss expl.dined inatruction will be
given to anyone buying e knitting n-nchinet and tha l~ssana would he limited ta
two or thzee people et nng time. Ne explained hie w1f~ currently operntes a
knit shop on Euclid and there hae never been e pexking problem there.
Jack White, Asaistant City AxtornQy, explained the reetriction for a knit shop
cennot be mede a part ~f the reclnfleitication, but cen be included in the
conclitionel uae permit• He etated aftex the property ia ruclaeaified to CL,
any use permitted ir~ that sane would be allawed without Planning Cc~mmiesion
approval and any uEe not permitted in the residential structure would requize
e new conditionel u$e pexmit. He auqqested thnt the Last ~entonce of
Condition No. 4 he deleted.
ACTION: Commisaioner McBurney offered a motion, seaonded by Ca~niasioner
Boues and MOTION CARRIED (CommiAaioner Herbst abaentl- the'~ the Anaheim City
Plesnning Commission hae revierred the pro~osal to re~l+~aeify subject property
tram the RS-7200 (Residential, Sinqle-Family) Zone to Lhe CL (Commercial,
Li.mited) Zone to permit the c~mmercial uae of e reaidential structure with
waivers of minimum numbeY of parkinq spacee and required location o! parking
spaces an a rectengularly-sheped parcel of land conaistinq of approximately
G000 equare feet located et the eou~heant corner of Sumac Lane and Euclid
Btreett nnd does hereby approve the Ne~ative Declaration lrom the requirement
to prepare an environmental i:npact re~+ort on the basis that thaxe would b~ no
siqnificant individuel or cumui,tive adverse environmentel iu~pact due to the
a,~proval of this Neqative Declaration aince the ]-naheim Genezal Plan
deeiqnates the aubject properLy !or ger~eral co^~ercinl land ~ees comu.ansurete
with the proposalt that no sensitive envir~nmental impacts are involved in the
~
MINi1TE8, ANl1HEZM CITY PLANNING COMMQ88IdN, l~uquat 23, 1982 82-451
praporalt thaC the 2niti~l Study aubmittad by the petitionar indicate• no
s1~~n1licant individusl or cwnulative adver~oe environm~ntal impactst end ~het
th~ Negetiv~ Declacation substantiating the loraqoinq lindinqe is o~ file in
th• City ot )1nAheim planninq Dspartment
Cumtaiasioncr McBurney otfer~d Resolutiori No. PC82-159 end moved ~or ito
~-as~age snd adoption thet the Ar-eheim City Planning Cotnmiaeion doee h~reby
~~rent ReclasAilication No. 82-83-6, eubject to Interdepartmentsl Camnitt~e
raconunandation~.
On roll call, the foreqoing reeoluti~n wss paseed b~ the followinq votes
11YESt BOOA3, BU9HORE- FRY~ KING, LA CI,AIR~, MC BURNEY
NOBSs NONE
11BSHNTt HERB3T
Coaunissioner McBurney otfered a mr~tion, sacQndad by Commiseloner Bouae and
MOTIOTI CARRIL~O (Come~iaaioner Herbst absent), that thA Anaheic~ City Planning
Coaaniseion does hereby grant wai~rers ~f Code requirement on the i~eai.s that the
use would be lirt-ited to a rotail knit shop nnd on Che basis of the
confi.qurAtion of the existing e'cructure on subject property.
Commisaioner McBurney offered 'Reaoiukion No. PC82-160 and moved for its
paseage and adoption that the Anaheim City Planninq Commission dofse hereby
qrant Conditional Use Perrtit No. 2363 on the baais thet the use ahall be
limited to a retail knit sho?, and subject to Interdepartmantal Cocmiittee
recoma-endatione, deleting the lnst sentence of Cnndition No• 4.
On rol.l call, the ~oregoin~,: resolution was paeaed hy the followinq vot~+:
AYES: BOUAS, HUSHORE, 1"'RY, KING, LA CLAIRE, MC BURNEX
NOLS: NONE
ABSENT: HER83T
Item No. 3 was heard fo:.lowinq ~tem No. 4
ITEM N0. 3: EIR N$GATCV~ DECLAR~-~ION AND VARI1-NCE NO. 3288
PUBLIC HEARING. OWNEIt: D& D OEVELOPMEN'P COMI'ANY• 11008 Norwelk Boulevard,
Santa Fe Sprinqa, CA 90670. Property descrlbed as a rectangularly-shaped
parcel of land consic~tinq of approximately 1.43 ecre, 2D30-2040 S. Harbor
Aoulevard.
Waiver of minimum number of pa~rkinq spaces to construct a 110-unit motel.
There was no c,n~s fndicating their presen~ce in opposition to aubject request
and elthough the s~taff report to the Planninq Coam~iesion wns not reed et the
public hearinq, it ia referred to and made n paxt af the minutes.
Steve Donaan, D& D Development, explained they are lookinq for a waiver of
parking requirement aimilar to the requeat in Item No. 4. He explained the~y
have built three hotels in Anehe±m and o,perated the Ca~valier in Garden Grove
and never ~experienced a perking prablew there. He atated Lhe In~ernatiostal
~.
~~;
MIN~]TEB, 11NAHEIM CITY I+LIINNINf3 COMWIS&20N, 71~3qu~t 23, 1a82 82-4,52
t Inn hao •xp~ri~nced sane parking probl~ms sinae th~ey opensd in July becauoa
they di.d not pratnota Lhe hot:el throuqh travel agsnciee snd sizlineo prioc to
op~ninq. He stetad tha pls~n~ !or this motel ere tho •ams, only revereed.
TH~ PUBLIC HlPARING W118 CLOl3ED.
Cc~nmie~loner Buahore clari.tlsd that a reataurent ie no longer being proposed
in conjunctlon with thia ~notel.
Commiegioner McBurney atr.ited he wauld tnke the adme poeftion ae on Veriance
No. 3289, Item No. 4, en~ thet e per.kinq stucly ehould be requirrd.
Cheirman Fry xead a lst~er trom William M. Bruce, Director of Property
M+~negwa~nt, Me~e Management, Inc.r ~er o! Parkwood Villecle Aparttnents, 401
W. Oranqewood, indicnt!.nq they d~~ not object to the motolr hut do queation Cha
requeat for parkiny weiver.
AC'PION: (:ommiasianer Ln Cle-ire offored e motian, aecondad by Caumiseioner
McBurnsy and MOTION CARRIED (Conaniesioner Nerbet ebe~nt.), thet connideration
of the efarementioned mntter t~e continued to tt-e requl.arly-ar_heduled meeting
csf Sept~mber 20, 1982, in order for the pe~ltioner to eubmit e perking demand
study performed by a certified treffic englneering coneultant for ~ubject
property end the surrounding eree.
Pnul Sinqer, Treffic Engineer, explai.ned hie office has a lenqthy list of
nccAptable traffic engineer coneultants availab:~.
ITEM N0. 4: EIR NL~GATIVE DECT~ARATTON AND VARIANCE NO. 3289
PUBLIC HEAItING. OWNER: ROBERT M. & GLORIA H. MILLBR, 1530 S. He~rbor
Bouleverd, Anahgim, CA 92802. Property fa der~cribed as e rectangulnrly-eheped
parael of la-nd consisting of apprAximetely 1.2 acree, 1530 S. Harbor Boulevard
(Cnrc~usel Motel ) .
Waiver ~f minimum number of parking Bp3Ce8 to expand an axietinq motel.
There was no one indicatinq their presonce in opposition to subject requesC
and althouqh the ataff report to the Planninq Coannissio~~ was not read at the
publi~ hearinq, it is referred to and mede a part of the minutes.
Robert Miller, owner and manaqer of the Carousel Motel, stated trt~ motel has
been in existence since 1956 end hes been expanded three times. He atated the
plans ere to remove 17 units and conatruct a 5-st~ry, 64-foot hiqh tower..
Mr. Mi:ler etated he had conducted a parkinq study for the taonths of May,
June• July end Auqust, and in July with 98~ oc~:upancy, parking averaged 25
vehicles per day. He explained he dass a tremendous amount of solicitinq and
advertiainq out of state which produces n lot of bus~neae fram over 500 miles
eway and these quests ueually nrrive by atr. He stdtec3 they have never had a
parklnq problen- and he wes sure this is a zesult of hie promational
advertisinq. He stated they feel they can adequately handle parkinq for 116
units.
TH~ PUHLIC HEARING WA8 CL03ED.
MINUT38, ANI~HEIM CIT'Y PI.~INNING COMMR88ION, 1-uguet a3, 1992 82-453
Chsirmsn Pry atnteQ ~ha •t~tf rsport indtcetas ther• will be a totel of 118
unit~. pean 8herar, 1-e0ociete Plennsr, expleined thet ligur.e include4 two
mnnager anits.
Respondinq to Ccxnmi~~ioner Houas, Dean 9herer explnined there is an existinq
sutanobile rentel agsncy at thi~e mota+l, w1t1i Mr. Miller adding there is alsn
an exist~ng cleliceteseen, operated by hi~ father, which ba~ir_elly eelle
teke-out eendwlchea.
Mr. Miller reg~onded to Commiasioner Boue~ thet the cer rentel eqency hea only
four vehicles ~n the eite et any one time, plue ane employee epaco•
Commissioner Bouas clarifiad that each maneger (dey and night) livee in n unit
fulltimo and r.equires one parkinq epacA.
Commieaioner Auehore atated it he~ Faeen discugeed thet a atudy of motels in
the CR Zona c~ndacted during eerl~~ mozninq houra rluring the penk seasan would
be helpful to Canmiselon i.n mekinq these decisione pexteining to parking
v~rianoes•
pean 9herer responded thet etaff is luoking for a deteiled pe~rkinc~ study
prepared by the petitioner such na zecortunanded in the draft peirking study. y~
explained ataff hae not done auch a survey becauae they fc+el their figures
would not differ qreatly en~l eech motel or hotol ehoul.d be considered on ite
uwrt merit and ench one examined by the Traffic Enginee:'•
Commiesioner Hushore atated he felt if a petitianer hires aomeone t~ ~lo a
treffic study, it will show what the petitionei' wants. He stated tha~t i~ th~:
reason he felt e cer caunt by Ataff during t}~~ peak seasan would be helpf.ul..
He added he knowe of on~ new n-otel whir.h he drivee past every week which has a
tremendou,a parkinq problem and it 81d n~t hxv~ a variance grnnted.
Jack White, Aesintant City Attorney, stnted under cuxrent code, austification
a~udy ie nat juetification for grnntinq a variancs nnd the only j
ie epecial circumstances npplicable to the specific property itaelf.
Coauaioaioner Buahore stated he does not see any reason to hnve the applicant
cotne up with this studya that possibly the code ghould be ahanqed1 that the
Commis~ion keeps grnnting these wniverg and no one has qone out t~ see l~ they
are re,~lly justified. He steted he could raot vote for eny request above the
67! previou~ly qranted witliout yustification.
Mr. Miller atated he has been in the business 32 yenre J:nd in the past they
only had poeaibly one busload per yenr, but last month he had eeven busloade
occupying ~4 raoms each.
Cc+romis~ioner Hushorc~ stated if this mote] has n 98• xcupancy rmte, it diftera
~raa other motels in the area whSch are experiencinq a slow down. He added a
lot of the [aotel operators eaid they had a lot of bue traffic nnd travel
agency referrala when, in fact, tl~ey did not.
Jack W'~ite stated in determininq whether or not a property i~s beinq denied a
privilaqe be~ng enjoy~d hy oticalpprogrrt iinttheesntaeZZOneaandvvicinity whiCh
Commiesion nr. : t~ com~a e a typ Pe Y
meete all codc requiremente and not caapare propeztiea on ahich variances have
been granted.
t.,
MINUT38, 7-NAHEIM CITY PI,l1NNINC COMMI88ION, Auquet 23, 1992 82-454
He addod tha aoning law~ do not reco~nise prec~dent nnd the inlormation ia
pruvidad in ths stat! report !or hiatoricel inlormetion to ehow whet hea
happened end probably i! eta!! did not proviAe the intormation, the petitionar
Mould.
Commissioner La Clsire st~ted the applicant ie probably correct with the
inlormation, but s lot o! thq Commiseioners have doubts ebout iuet how many
cars there are end cen't just trelieve everybody with no proo! in ~ront ot them.
Mr. Miller etetdd hn took a phy.~icel count of every cer rogistered.
Commisgioner Le Claire pointed ~.,ut thoee arn avernqea and ahe wea concerned
ebout what would heppen when L•here is nn overflow ot parkinq.
Mr. Miller explained an four dayn there were 38 care end on three days there
were 19, ao the hiqhest liqure wa~ 38. He added he certeinly doee not want to
cauee himnelf ~nny trouble and lack ot pnrking !or the gueet3 would be e biq
prok~lem.
Commisaioner Buehore etated he believes Mr. Miller and Pelt he ie probably
justified in e~kinq for 63~, but the next petitioner would went the name thinq
end it may not be justified xnd that would ceuse more harm than good ta tha
recreationel area.
Chnlrmen Fry eteted this ie the highest raquest for a parking wdiver he hea
aeen aince he hes been on khe C~mmieaion and e lot of queationa have been
raiaed. Hs a3ded thie ie no reflection on Mr. Miller'o inteqrity or on his
operation, but the CAmmission wanta to be convinced. He edded tbie ie a very
unusual shapnd parcel, but he ie hav.i.ng a hard time acceptinq this percentnqe,
pointing out some sp~ces are used by the auto rental agency.
John Swint, 707 W. Nor~h Street, Anahei.m, etated 7 spacee are counted for the
take-out lood operat.ion, a.nd if those 7 epncee are counted as motel spaces,
the percentaqe would be 66.6i.
Commleaioner McBurney atated usinq the petitioner's figure~, with 38 cars and
50 uni.ts, 76$ parking was ueed and he could not ~uatify the requeat and felt
this project wuuld be overbuildinq the property.
Commieaioner Fry stated he did not not thi.nk the bu$ turn-around area is in a
good location and buses will be atoppinq on Harbor to unload their paesenqers.
tdr. Miller etnted the buses normally etay 2 or 3 daye. It was pointed out the
passenqers fran the bus woul~l be utilizing more than 20 rooms.
Commiesioner La Claire s~nted thinqa do cha ge nnd the method of promotional
e3vertiainq coulc~ chenge, and she felt 63~ is just not adequate.
Peul Binqer, Traltic Engineer, eta~ed he ia conaerned about parking in thie
entire nrea and if parking waivers continue to be qranted, this entire
rearentional area will be ehortchnngedt thnt if mass transportatian becomes a
reality in the future, the problem won't be eo great, but he was not eure i.f
and when that will happen. He explnined it ie recommended in the new parking
~
MINVTB6, 1-N1IHEIM CiTY pL11NNINC3 COMMi88i0~N, 1-uguet 23, 1982 82-455
orc9inanoe that a d~tai.led parking atudy bs preparsd t~or the rpecilio proparty
end th~~ antir• qanexal area to d~termine i! there io enouqh perki.ng end that
atudy should be perlorinad by an indmpendent tza!!ic anpineering conaultant and
paid !or by the applicent.
Mr. Miller etated h~ ~o~sn't tnake n practice ot lyinq end wauld do tlti~ ~tudy
baeed cn the total number o! roome rented and the number o! vehiclAa. He
etal:ed he is booked 100• throuqh 3eptamber 16 end could provida ectuel liguree
for that period.
Coannieoioner La Cleir• etated the Commiesion has bean qrantinq par.king waivers
over and over, moetly baaed on the documente-tion pr.esented by the petitioner,
anA are et e point now where they muat eveluate the cumulr~tive ei`lect on tho
whole area ba.ed on what the Treflic Engine+er ie saying.
Commiaeioner Bushorc~ euggested actuelly countinq veh.tcles at 6:00 e.m. et some
of the motels which have expanded, noting thie is thA height of the buey
eeaeon.
Commissioner Kinq Xefer.red to t~ie eteff report, paraqraph 16, pertain.ing to
eiqne. Mr. Miller stated th~y are willing t~ comply with the eiqn ordinence.
Commigaioner I,a Clairo Aeked who ahould do the traf!°ic etudy. Chairman ~'ry
atated if one petitioner is allowed to conduct hi.e own study, everyone wi11
expect the aame privileqe.
Dean 3herer etated steff would like to eee each individual project developer,
certainly of this maqnitude, ~have a parking demand atudy prepared by ~
certilied traffic enqineering consultant. He stated etaff could check evezy
motel listed in Paragraph ].5 and ~rovic~e a specitic count end he lelt a
four-week continuance would be edequate.
Mr. Miller stated each individual property ahould be considered on ite own
merit and he felt because of his au-rketing, this project ehould be acceptable.
Coc~miasioner Buahore stated this reque~ted pnrkinq count will help the
Coeamission and poasibly add credence to Mr. Miller's statistic$.
Commisetoner Bouas asked why thie will nor. be conaidered a hotel. Mr. Miller
responded thcsre will be no restaurant or food service.
Mr. Miller state8 he would like to beqin deu-~21tir~n by Octobar 1 because of
contractural obliqationa in February, otherwiae 1~e could be held up for one
year.
Commisaioner McBurney stated he felt ataff ehould perform a count of care and
tho petitioner should provide a parkinq demand study for this property and
this matter ehould be continued until those studiea have been completed.
Comcaisaioner Bushore suggeated the staff should count the cazs between 6 and 7
a.m. He noted elso occasionally travelers are pulling a trailer and will
leave it parked in a egece and that should aleo be counted, and some
recreationnl vehicle owners will atay in a motel and their vehicle uaes more
than one apace.
k!i~
~e
~
,b
~
~
; 1
MIN~'PEB, 11NAHEIM CITY PLANNINCi COMM288ION, 1-ugupt 23, 1982
82-456
J1~"l~YONs CAnm~io~ion~r $oua• ofl~red a motion, aecond~d by Commiesioner
MaBurney and MOTION CARRIbO (Commi~~ioner Herbst abasnt), that considera~ion
o! the aforamanLionod matter be continuer! to the m~etinq ~! 8eptamber 20,
1982, in ordsr tor rhe p~-~itioner to submit e parkinq damsnd atu4y psrtormed
by a cartitied tre!!ic enqinsezinq conti~ltant~ and in ordar !or ete!! t~ make
e study a! motels in thy area ahich have exF,anded with perking weivers, said
etudy to be conducted .in the esrly caorning hours end on week-ende to determine
i! Lhere nr• parking probleme.
Mr. Miller agein indicnted his deeite to t~egin demolition by October 1. Javk
White explained there i~ e 22-day eppeel period belore eny ection o! the
Planninq Coena~iseion becnmee finel.
There wea a brief diecuseion req~rdinq elimination of t}~e delioetssern an9 car
rental agenay, witli Mr. Miller in~iicatinq they are thore l~or hie quests'
convnnienae.
The vote wae Lnken oh kFe precdding motion and M(YTION CARRI~D (Cammiseioner
Herbat abeent), to co~tinue thie mrtter to 8e~~ember 20, 1982.
Mr. Mi.ller etated he is n memk~er of r~everal Chambers of Commerce and Anaheim
hae alwnye been the moet eupportive, and moet prograaeiva toward the
bus inessme-n .
ITEM N0. 5: EIR NECATIVE UECLARATION AND VARIANCE NO. 3290
PUBLIC HEAR2NG. OWNERs ZANY'8 W.p VAN WINKLE, INC., 301 W. ICatelln Avenue,
Aneheim, CA 92802. Property dsecxibed ae a rectangularly-shap~.~i parcel of
lnnc~ consistinq of apprnximetely 1.4 acres, 301 W. Katella Avenue (Rip Van
Winkle Motel).
Waiver o! minimum r~umber of p~srkinq epacos to expdnd nn exiatinq motel.
Thers was no one in~licatinq their preeence in oppoeition to eubject requeet
and slthouqh the statf report f:o the Pldnninq Commission was not read at the
public hearinq, it ie referred to and aude a part of the ipinutes.
John Swint, 707 W. North Street, asked !or a tour-week continuanct. He
explained the Rip Van Winkle Motel is actually two aepa-rate motels which have
been joined and es a reault, there ere two aepnrate poole and they are noisy.
He stated the owner Qlnns to eliminnte the two pools nnd aonstruct another one
up front and add 17 ndditional unite.
Mr. swint etated he has been qetting variancea approved for the Iaet 14 y~ars
and the tirst one was on W~st Strae,t before air and bus tratfic became what it
ie today and felt since he had received 14 apprnvals, evidently it hed been
proven that the perkinq deniand ia not as ~:eat aa code requireg.
Paul 8inger, Tra!!ic En~ineer, etated he daea not have the same concerns in
thia request, but would etill recommend a parking demand study.
THE PVBLIC HEARING W718 CIASED.
: r
~ t
1.
~ ~
MINflT~B, 11NAHEIM CITY PI,ANNINO COMMI88ION, Augttet 23, 1982 82-457
Commi~~ionar Ki.nq ind.toatsd h~ did not think tho requeet at 89t 14 the eame ae
the two previeu~ raqueete.
Commis~ioner l,a Cleir• atetod the~ Commiseion cennot ba eura that 89e ie
adequata ntil ~tudiee are comF~leted. She f~+lt the Commiseion ehould be
conaiatet~t ~nd raquire a parking demend study.
Chairman Fry eteted he really doeen't have e problem on thia request.
ACTTON: Coauniseioner Le ~leixe olfered e moti~n, aeconded by Commiesioner
Hushora and MOTION CARRISO (Commiesioner Herbet nbsent), that coneideration uf
the aforementioned matter bo continuad to the reqularly-acheduled meeting of
Smptember 20, 19a2, in order !or the petitioner co submit a pazking demend
atudy performed by a certified trdffic enqineerinq conaultent tor r~ub~ect
property nnd the aurroundinq aree.
ITFM NO. 6
~...~.~.._.
REPORTB AND RECOMl~NDATIONS
The followinq Report$ and Recoma-endation stafP reports were preeented but
~ot reed:
A. CONDITIONAL US~ PERMIT N03. 1.166 AND 1645 - Request by Micheal L.
Vnlen, Preaident, Town Tour Bua Compeny, for retroacxive extenaiona
of time on property loceted at 340 Katelld Way end 1825 Mountain View
Avenue.
ACTION: Commiasioner Kinq oftered a motion, eeconded by Commiasioner
McBurney end MOTION CARRZED (Comm;.ssioner Nerbet absent), that the
Anaheim ~ity Planning Commiseion does hereby qrnnt retroactive
exteheions of time for Conditlonal Use Perm3t Nos. 1166 nnd 1645 to
expire o~ August 16, 1983.
B. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 1883 - Request fram David S. Collins, for
a two year extension of time for Conditional Uae Peratit No. 1883 on
property located at 1514 Weat Brosdway.
ACTION: Commissio~er Kinq offered a raotion, seconded by Gomntissioner
McBurney and MOTION CARRIED (Commisaioner Herbst ab~ent)•, thnt the
Anaheim City Planning Cortm~ieaion does hereby qrant a two year
extenei.an of time for Conditional Use Pernunit No. 1883 to expire
Auqust 28, 1984.
C. CONDrTIONAL USR 'rcRMIT NO. 2207 - Request from C. L. Phar.~ris, Sa~nd
and Gravel, Inc., for a one year extenaion of time for ~onditional
Use Permit No. 2207 for property located on thR west side of
Richfield Road, approximntely 1750 feet eouth of the centerline of La
Palmn Avenue.
ACTION: Com~ai.aeioner Kinq offered a cation, seconded by Commiasioner
McHurney and MOTiON CARRIED (Commissioner Herbat abaent), that the
Ant~heim City Planninq Commi.ssior~ does hereby qrant a one-year
retroactive exteneion o~ time for Conditional Use Permit NO. 2207, to
expire 011 JL1t1@ 1~ 1983 e
i~~
`.~
MINUTIC9~ ANIINEIM CITY PL7INNINO CnMIMI88I0T1, 71uqu~tt 23, 198~ 82-458
D. RI~CIJ188il~IC11TION N0. 81-BZ-5 71ND CONDITIONIIL U81C P6RMIT N0. ~259 -
Requ~~t lrom 11m~ri.aan National Properti~• to aon~iQ~r • proposed
tenant rslooatian a~si~tenoa propooal !or Orangswood ]~cr~• Mobilehome
Park located et 2111 South Ml~nch~~ter 7-v~nue.
J~ck Whits, Assi~tant City 11~torney, axplained tha City Counail
con~inu~d this n-atter from their 1-uqu~t 17 me~tinq in or!!er thet
Plennl.ng Connaisslon could n-ake a rpoonanendation. He !urlher
explained this request perteine to the reloaation plnn only einca the
Planninq Gommission haa alr~edy denied the reclee~itication and
conditional uae permit requast~.
Coanntseioner Buohora suqgeated recommendinq that the propoeed
Mobilehome Park Overlay Zone ordinance be c~mplied with upon ite
adoption by the City Council.
Commisoioner Bushoze offerad a motion, seconded by Coaimissionsr Boues
e~nd MOTION CARRTBD (Commisaioner Herbet nbeent), that th~ Aneheim
City Planninq Coannieeion doee hereby recommend to City Council that
if they qrent Reclaesificetion No. 81-62-5 end Conditional Uee Permit
No. 2259, the owner be zequired to pey all relocati.on benefits
included in the Mobilehome Park Overlay Zone Ordinance currently
under consideration by the City Councilt nnd further that this Action
doea not effect Planninq Commieaion's nctiana for denial o~ the
reclassiticat.ton nnd conditional use permit.
F.. TENTATIVE I~U1P OF TRACT NOS. 10996, 10997 and 1099B - Regusat trom
Georqe Maaon, Jr., The Gunst~~ Hall Compeny, !or exteneiona of time
for Tentntive Map of Tract Nos. 10996, 10997 end 10998 located on the
0outhwest cArner of Avenida de Santiaqo and Hidden Canyon Road.
ACTION: Commiaeioner King o!lered a aatlon, aeconded by Commiesioner
McBurney and MOTION CARRIBD (Co~issionez Herbst absent), thnt the
Anaheim Cit,y Planninq Conmiisaion docs hereby qrant one year
extensions of time far Tentative Mnp of Tract Nos. 10996, 10097 and
10998 to expire on October 6, 1983.
~ ~.
MIpL1Tt8~ AN11K~~M C~TY P1.~1tiNING COMlIBaION, Auqu~tt 23 • 198~ 8~-459
OTH~R pISCU88I0Nt
P~rtaininq to th• propo~~d Mabii~hom~ Paxk Ovsrl~y Zon~ Ordinana~,
Com~nisaionor Lu Clair~ •~at~d ohe ha• had phon~ c~lla with quastion•
a• to vfi~n th~ r~loaation b~nolits vrould bs paiQ ~nd r+h~ther or not
oo~ts would M peid !or overniqht •t~y• in aatel~ durinq tha mova.
J~ck t~Phhit~ explained the ordin..nca doas not inolude matel costa. Ho
•t~t~d saae o! the~v paym~nta are qoinq ko b~ condition~ o! variouo
typ~• o! parmi.ta (i.e. recla~sificetion or conditional ua• p~rmits)
and wiYl have to be coa~plied with ao stipulatad in tha oonditio• s,
soma prior to buildinq permita, soa-c prior to introduction oi an
ordinance, etc.
Cortnnunitywide Community Development Block Grant Citiaen Parf:icipntion
Committ~~ !or 1983-94.
It wss the ganeral conr~ensue of the Connnisaion that Pnul Kinq Bhould
continua to eerve on ~hia committee.
1-OJOURNM3CNT: There being no lurther bueineas, Co~aa~iseloner Bouas oftered a
motion, •econ8ed by Commiseioner McBurney and MOTION CARRI~D
(Commieeionmr Herbet abeent), that the meeting be edjourned.
The meeting wae ad journed et 2 e 45 p.an.
Reepectfully aubaaitted,
d2c.~ ^' .
Edith L. Harris, Secretary
Anaheim Cfty Pl~nning Conm~inaion
EI+H: l:u
~