Minutes-PC 1982/09/20„~ ~ . ~ 3
+~~
REQULAR MEBTING 0!' THE 11NI1H~ZM CITY P2.~11NN1NG COMMI88ION
RtGUL11R MEL"~'ING The requler meeL-inq ot the Aneheim City Plenning Commioeion
wae celled t~~ ordez by Chairtnan Fr; at 10:00 e.m.,
5eptemtx~r 20, 1982, in the Council Chna-b~sr, e quorum being
present nnc~ the Coaaniasinn revigwed plana o! the itams on
today's nqende.
PREBENT Chairmen: Fry
Connniesionera: Boues, euahore, Herbet, Kinq, La C1eirR,
McBurn~y
ABSENT
ALSO PRESENT
CommiRai~nc~rs: N~ne
Annika Santalaht.i
JACIC W}1~t.P.
Jeck Judd
Paul 3lnqer
Deen Sherer
Edith Ht+rrie
AAeiatant Diractor for Zoning
Aeaietent City Attnrney
Civ. F.ngine~ariny Asaociate
Trafiic F.ngineer
Aoaociate P1annPr
Planning Commiaaion 5ecretary
APPROVI-Y. OF MINUTES: Commiesioner King offered a motion, aeconded by
Commiesioner Bouas and MOTION CARRIEA (Conanissioner La Cldire absteininq),
that the minutes of tha meeting of Saptember 8, 1982, be approved as corrected
on page 489 to ehow that Commiesioner King offc+rad Resc?lution No. PC82-170.
ITEM NO. l: EIR N0. 253, RECLASSIFICATZOt4 NO. d2-83-4, WAIVER OF CODE
REOUIREMENT ANU CONDITYONAL USE PERMIT N0. 2362
PUBLIC HEARING. OWNER: AJ.BERT BORCHARD & KENNETH L. LARSON, 5915 Bur.chard
Avenue, Los Angeles, ~A 90034, and ROY W• MABEE, 2651 W. Lincoln Avenue,
Annheim, CA 92801. AGENT: GFELLER DEVEI.OPN~NT COMPANY, INC., 228 W. Main
Street, Tustin, CA 92680, Attn: Bob Reeae. P.raperty is described as n
rectanqularly-eha~ed percel of land consisting of appz~xitnately 19.57 acr~es,
2925 W. Lincoln Avenue (Lincoln Bench Mobile Mancr Park).
Reclaesificdtion requeat: RM-1200, CL end RS-A-43,000 to RM-1000.
Conditional Use requests To permi.t a 810-unit, 38-foot hich condc~minium
complex with waivers of: a) required lot frontaqe, b) minimum floor erea, c)
minimum landscaped setback, d) ~-inimum recreational-leisure area, e) m~nimua-
distence between buildings, f) minimum number, type and dimensinns of parking
specee and g) minimum dista.nce trc+m pt~rking spaces to dwelling unite.
Continued from the meetings of July 26, and ]~uqust 23, 1982.
Bob Reese, Gleller Development Company, explained they have been working
diliqently ors thia project since it wee continued end ere trying a different
approach taking Coa~m~iseian'e concerna i.nto coneideration and will be reddy to
sub~ai.t revised plans by the meetinq ot October 18, 1982. He explained the
nwnber of unlts will be reduced from 810 to 660 and the four-story buildinq
and eeveral waivera have been eliminated. He addnd he will also suba~it copies
of the agre~montg tha tenante signed when they oriqinally came into the
mobilahaue park.
82-493
MIl1UTS9. 11P1AHEIM CZTY PLANNING COMM1I88ION~ SdPTENIBxR 20, 1982 82-494
11CTIONs Comn-lesionar Herbet o!lered a awtion, seconded by Comnfopioner Houas
end MM'ION C1IRRIEO, thet ooneiderration a! the aforemention~d matter be
continued to the ragularly-r,chadulRd m~~ting of October 18, 1982, at the
request ~! the petiti~ner in orde:• thet revieed plens cnn be subenitted.
ITBM NO. 2: EIR NP~GIITIVE DECLJIRATIO~? 1-ND VARIIINCE N0. 3288
PUBLIC HffiARING. OWNER: D. 6 b. DEV~I.OPMtENT COMPANY, 11008 Narwalk Houlevard,
4~+nta Fe Springe, CA 90670. property d~~ecribed ee a~ rectengularly-eheped
parcel at lend coneieklnq of Approximat~~ly 1.43 ec.re, 2030-204D S. Harb~r
Boulevard, ~-n~heion, CA 92805.
Waiver o! minimum number of parking sp+~cea to r.onatruc:t e 110-unit motel.
Continued from the meoting of Auquet 23, 14t32.
There was no one indiceting their preeence in opposition to eubject request
end althouqh th~ staPf report was not r.~sa~i, it is referred to end made a part
of the minutea.
Steve Darman, D& D Development, explained a parking eurvey of severel motels
in the ~rea was prepared for thie project by Westan Pringle end AesociatQa,
and also a survey was prepared by the Planninq Depertment 5taff nnd both
aurveys ind~cate the proposed p+~rking at 68d is sufficient.
THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED.
Commiaaioner Bushore stated these surveys did provide the ~uetification needed
by the Coaaaission for the w~+~.vers that hAVe been gra~nted for these motels in
the pianeyland area.
ACTIONs Commiseioner Bushc+re affered a motion, seconded by Commisaioner Kinq
and MOTTON CARRIED, thet the Anaheim City Planninq Commisaion has reviewed the
propoeal to conatruct a 110-unit motel with waiver of minimum number of
parkinq spaces on a rectangularly-eheped parcel of land conaieting of
approximately 1.43 acres, having a frontaqe of approximately 250 feet on the
east side of Harbor Boulevard and further deacribed tes 2030-2040 S. Harbor
Boulevards and doeg hereby approve the Neqative Declaration from the
requirement to prepare an environmental impact report on the baeis that there
would be no siqnificant individual or cuanulative adverse environmental impact
due to the approval of. this Neqative Declara*ion since the Anahefm Generel
Plan desiqnates the sub~ect property for commercidl recreation land uses
commensurate with the propasals that no sensitive envixonmental 1~apacte are
involved in the proposal~ that th~ In~tial Study subc-itted by the petitioner
indicatee no siqnificent inciividual or cumulative adverse enviranmental
impactat and that the Neqative Decleration substantiating the foregoing
findinqs is on file in the City of Anaheim Planninq Depertment.
~.
~
H2-495
MINIJTlbBr ~'11-HEIM CI'!'Y PL7INNINC3 CO1~Q9ISSIdN~ BEPTISMLB6R 20~ 1982
Cc+mmis~ioner Au~hore olfered Resolupion No• ~~is~ion~~doe~Vherehy qranta~~aga
•nd aQoption thet the Anaheim City Lanning
Veriance No. 3288 on tha bauie that a csrtain percentsqe ot th• guests errive
by traneportaCion nwde~ other tha~n private vehicles ae ehown by survays
conducted by tha Planninq Dwp~+rtn~ent 8talt ~o~ ~ed~wiglcb4•ed~quatc(~andhe
petitioner which indicetes psrking apacae p F~
eubject to Interdepartmentel Coamnittee reconnnondatione.
On rell call, the foreqoing resolution w~e paased by the following vote:
J-YESs BOU11S, BUSHORE, P'RY, HERBST~ KING, I.A CLAIRE~ MC BURNEY
NOEBs NONE
AHSENTs NONE
ITEM N0. 3s EIR NEGATIV~ QECLARATION AND VARIAt~1C~ NO. 3289
MILLER, 1530 S. Narbar
PUBLIC HEARING. OWNER: ROBERT M. 6 GLORIA H.
Boulevnz'ii, Anaheimr CA 9280z• ~roximately dP2cacres,~1530rSrtHe ~rrly-shaped
pnrcel of lund consisting ot apP
Boulevard, Anaheim. CA 92805. (Ceroueel Mote:l).
Waiver o! minimun~ n«mber of perking spacee to expand en exiating motel.
Cnntinuad from the meetinq of Auguat 23, 19E32.
TheXe was no one indicetinq their presence in oppoeition to subject roquest
nnd althouqh the staff rAport was not reed, it ie reforred to and made a part
ef the minutes.
Bob Mill.er. owner, etaked he felt the parking surveys done shaw that their
Ne reterred to etag!'s
request for 63• of the r.equ.ired parki~~g is reeaonahle.
comments reqardinq elimination of their delicateasen zoblemseandhis basically
been there for six years and has crented no perking p
a food service £or the guests, serving coffee and donuts ar take-out
sandwiches and hes no sit-down service. Concezning the car .rental aqency, he
agreesd ~he concerns are proe~bc~eetedaaeproblem~ubutche8hasrnot hadathis mdny
use, even though it has nev
units taefore.
THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS L'L03ED.
Mr• Miller stated the report indicates 1 bus equels 5 parking spaces and
explained one bus tour will utili.ze approxia~ately 25 raoms•
Commissioner I3ouas atated ehe felt tho commente referred to the number of
parking apace~ n bus would utilize when perked and it was noted it would
probably use five .RpAC@B pairked parallel.
Mr. M.iller noted there will be a haaomerhead turn-around provided foendicua rgs
and e:aerqency vehicles. He etated the buaes would always park Perp
Commissioner Bu~hore stated he would aqree thet the delicatessen does not
create a parking problem is it is cur°rently aperated k~ecause it does just
8~~~,~~ ~Fe guests and nat the qeneral public. He agroed with staff that the
car rentnl agen~y sho+uld probnbly be eli.mi.r~ated.
82-496
MINUTL-8. AN11~ilCIM CITY PLI~NNIliG Cd~IMIS8I0N, SEPTlR+18gR 20, 1982
Mr. Mill~sr noted hie contract with the car rentel agency ate-tes that thore
shall be no more tha~n f.ive vehicles on the eite at any one time, but
occnsionnlly there will be more. Commiea~aner Bushoro stated there wera
twolve vehiclee there teday. tle eugqeeted that somethinq be w~rked out to
provide the queata with vehicleB wi.thout heviny twelve vet~icleg perked
on-eite. He added twa BpdCAB are ueed by the aqency's empl~Yees.
Mr. Miller etnted the car rentel agency is only a minor source o! income and
he would not allow it to herm hie maj~r eource of income which ie the motel•
He qtated the rentel aqency is a convenionce for his quests•
Commiseiongr Nerbst atated he has a problem with the percentage of parking and
noted the higheat percentage granted in the peat is 67! end thie request ig
for 638. He etated ho is concarned beceuse devel~per.e do reseerch the recorde
and if 63i in epprnved for thia project, athere will be requeat.ing the same
thing. No stnted it appears tho petitioner in simply overbuildinq the
property with the caz rental aqency, reteil atore and the mntel.
Ch~irmnn Fry notQd if the car rentel agency is ~-1lmineted and those six RpAC88
added to the motel, the percentage would t~•e hrouqht up to 68~.
Following a brief discugsion reqerdinq n parking req~iirement fc,r the car
rental aqency and the deliceteasen, [~an Sherer, Associate Ptanner, exp?einod
those perking requirements are based on the floox ares.
Commission~r Buahore explained th~ delicatecsen consists besically of vending
machines and he felt t.he parking requiremente shou]d be reduced and if thc car
rental agency is eliminated, tltie parking ratio ahould be acceptable.
pean Sherer Statnotteeretailietore~andsthe parkinqerequirementsnwould beat the
delicatessen is
reduced.
Mr. Miller stated he would eliminate the car rental ac~ency.
p~ipp; Conunissioner Herbst oflered a motion, seconded by Coucnisaioner Kinq
and MOTTON CARRIED, that the Anaheim City Planning Commiasion has considered
the proposal to expand nn exiating motel wi~Celaofelend consisting ofr of
pbrking ~aces on a rectangularly-shaped pa
approx.imately 1.2 acres, having a frontege of approximately 85 feet on the
east side of Harbor Boulevard, approximately ?80 fect south af the centerline
of Manchester Avenue and further dascribed a~s 1530 S• Harbor Houlevardt and
does hereby approve the Neqative Declaration from the requirement to prepare
an envizonmental impact report on the basis that there would be no aignificdnt
individual or cumulntive adverse environmental impect due to the appr~val of
this Negative Declaxation since the Anaheim General Plan desiqnates the
subject property for commercial recreation land uses commeneurate with the
prnposalt that no sensitive environmental impacts aze involved in the
proposals that t1'-e Initial 5tudy au~itted by the petitioner indicates no
siqnifia~~veiDeclarationrsub tantiatingvtheefaregoinyefindinqs8lseonafilehin
the Neq
the City of Anahein- Plamiing Department.
_ . .. _. _ ..... _ _....~+y~w.w =
, i~
,~ j ~
1982 62-497
MINUT86 ~ 7WANSIM CITY ?IJINNINfi COMMlI88ION ~ SSPTSMHER 20 ~
Coma-i~sioner H~rbst o!larod Resclution No. PCBJ-174 and moved !or its pa~saqe
Ccam-isalQn dcas h~reby grant
and adoption thet the An~heim City Plenning o! tha tnotel
Variance No. 32d9 on the baeie thet the perking demends qtudy
perking in th~ Q~`neyland ared indicates that the propoaed parking is edequate
and on the baaia that th~o °~~~yiAndrthe~ thepdelicateseaniiannot ongid~red a
rentel aqency lrom the p P esta and thet the propoeed
retai.l ontlet eince it basically aerves the motel gu
plens will provide 69• of the rec~ired total and subject to Interdepaztm~+ntel
Committee recommendeti~na•
On roll call, the foreqoing resolution wes paeeed by the followi.nq votes
AYESs EOUAB~ BUSHOREr FRY~ HERBSTr KING~ I,A CUAIREr MC HURNEY
NOES: NONE
Agg~pT: NONE
3290
ITFM N0. 4: EIR NEGATIVE DECLARATIdN AN~ VAT~~CE N0.
301 W. Katelle~ Avenue,
pUgLIC HEARING. OWr1ER: 7ABYaeg~iY,edNaaIa~a~~anqularly-ehaPed Pdreel of
Ana~heim, CA 92802. Fropcrty
land consisting of appr~ximately 1.4 ecres, 301 W. KAte11a Avenue, Anaheim, A
92805 (Rip v$n Flinkle Motel)•
Waiver of minimu~ nu~er of parking epaces to expand an existing motel•
Con~.inued from the meeting of Auqust 23~ 1982.
There was no one indiceting their preeence in op~~~t~on to eubject requegt
and e~lthouqh the staff report Wag not read, it i6 referred to and mede a part
of the minutea•
J~hn 3wint, aqenx, was present to answer nnY ~Nestions.
THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED.
ACTION: Cotnmigeioner McBurney ahe~ a a motion, secc+nded by Comn+issionerkin g
City Planninq Co~+n-ission has revieWed the
and MOTIOr1 Cl~-RRIF.D, that the An
proposal to expand an existing motel with wniver of c-inimu~' n~r of par 9
roximately
spacee on a rectnnqularly-shaped garcel of land consistinq o: aPP
1.4 acres located at the northweat corner of tCmtella Avenue and Clnmentinerov~+
Street and further deecribed as 301 w•irgment~t~VpreParenan~environmentaLP
the Negdtive Declsretion from th~e rg~N igxc8nt individual or
inipact report on the basie that ther~- t due to theea proval of this Negative
cwnulative adverse enviranmental impe dtes tihe subject property far
Declarntion since the Anaheim General Pl.an deaign rn e~lt that no
commercinl recreational land uses comntensuz'nte with t e p P~
acts nre involved in the proposnlt that the Initial
sensitive enviroruaental ititioner indicates no aiqnificant individunl or
Study subaiitted by the pe
cumulative adverse environmental impactsi and that the Negr~tiof ~aheim on
substantiatiag the foreqoing findinqe ie on file in t1~e C= Y
Plenning DePert~nant.
'i ~
~
MINUTEar AtIIAliEIM CITY pL1-NNI1~1G GQMMII88ION, SBPT~lMBgR 20, 19d2 62-498
~ommioaionsr McHurney o!lored Resolution Nn. PC82-175 and moved !or ita
paa~age and edoption thet ths Aneheim City Planning Cotmaipoion does hereby
qr~nt Varidnce No. 3290 on tho be~le Chet perkinq denu~nd studies o! motel
parkinq in the Disneyland ~ar.ea ihA~Cdte thaG the 89• o! requirod total
proposed is adequate on the baeie khat e percentdqe o! tha guests arrive by
traneportation modes other th+~n ptiva~te vehicle end subjact to
Interd.~pertmental Committee recofitnendations.
On rall call, the loregoing resolution wae paesed by the following v~te:
AYEB: BOUl1S, BUSHORE, FRY, HERHST, ICING, LA CLAIRE, MC BURNEY
NOES: NONE
ABBENT: NONF.
Commissioner Barnaa pointed out that these waivers for parking are beinq
granted for motels in the Disneyland erea unly bec~uae of the number of queste
who arrive by plane ar bus end ia not necassarily something thnt will Un
granted enywhere elae in Anaheim.
Commiseioner Houae po~nted out thAt each of the three petitionere ~ad
presented a pdrkinq etudy which indicates perking propu,~ed is a~equete. ~ohn
Swint indicatod he will be aubmitting a parking report on e~ny t'uture motel
expdnsion or new motels.
ITEM NO. 5. LIR NF.GATIVE DECI,ARATION AND COt~DITIONAL USE PERMIT Nn. 2365
( RP:ADVERTISED )
PUBLIC HEARING. OWNER: ~AYMOND G. SFEIiAR, ER' AI., 6937 Avenida De Santingo,
Anaheim, CA 92807. Property described ae nn irreqularly-ehaped perce: of land
consiatinq of approximetely 1.8 acre, 5?50 E. La PelmA Avenue.
To permit on-sale alcoholic boveragea in e pr.oposed resteurant.
Continued from the meetinq of September 8, 1982.
There wea no one in~icating their presenae in opposition to subject request
and althouyh the stafP report wae not read, it is reterred to and made a part
of the minutes.
This c-atter was heard following Item No. 6 inaamuch ae ~he applicant was not
preaent.
R.ichard Huston, erchitect, 338 W. Llncoln, Anaheim, aas present ta answer any
questions.
THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED.
~` ~ ~.
MINUTa9, 1WANI~IM CITY PI.JINNING CO!lMISSION, SEPTBbiBER 20, 1982 82-A99
l1CTION: Cotroni~eioner King offsred s motion, a~cundad by Ccninrtis~ioner McDurney
end MOTION CJIRRIED, thst the Anah~lm ~ity Plennf.nq Coaoeiseion ha3 reviewed the
propoanl to permit on-~ale alcohol.ic beverdgee in a eemi-enclo~ed rentaurant
on an irr~gularly-a~~aped psrcel ot land consistinq e! apprc~ximetely 1.8 ecree,
having e tzontaqe o! epprexttnak~ly 273 fee+t on the sc~ith Aide o! Le Felme
Avenue nnd turth~•: de*cribe~ as ~750 E. Le Pelota I~v~~nuet end doee hnreby
approvc thR Naqetive Ueclsration trom tha requixame•e to prepare en
environmental itn~ect report an the baeie th~at ther.e a~uld t,e no siynificent
individnal or cumulative adverse environmPntal impact due to the approval of
thi• Negetiva Oeclaration eince the Anehaim Generaa. Pl~n dasiqnete~ tho
subject property tor qenerel commerciel land uses cammeneurete with the
propoenlt thet no aensitive anv~ronmdntal impacts are involved in th~
pr~paselt thet the Initial Study duumitked by t.he petitionez indicetee no
siqnificent individual or cumuletive edveree environmental impar,tar en~. that
th~ Negetive peclarntion auhAtentia~ing the for~qoing findinqs is on f~lo in
tha c:ir.y of Annhe:m P1Anning DepArtment.
Commiseio~er Kiny offerAd Re~~'~~tion N~. Pc'82-176 and movod for if.e pasaege
and edo~,tion that tho Anahgim City Pi~nning Coa~a-isaion doea hereby qrant
Conditionnl Use Pei•mi.t Mo. 2365 subjer.t ta Ir~terdepertmentel Committee
r~corcanandatione .
un r~ll call, ±he foregoir~g resalution w+~s pasned by the follawing vote:
AYE3s 80UAS, BUSHORE, PRY, HF.RBST, K'lNG, I;A CLA:RE, MC: [~i1RNF.Y
NOES: NONE
AHSENT: NANE
ITEM N0. 6. ~IR NF.C;ATl~i~' PEGI.ARATION, Wl.?VER nF CODE REQUIRF.MF•NT AND
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Nu. 23?4.
PUBLIC HEARINC. OWNER: ANAHEZM HUSINESS CENTER, P. O. Box 10077, Santa Ana,
CA 92711. AGENT: WIJ~I,IAM D. 11DAMS, 228 W. Cerritos Avenue, 14nahcim, CA
92805. Properey dQSCribed a8 en irreqularly-ahaped parcel of ~.end c:onaieting
~f xpproximately 12.3 acrec~ located at the eouthwest cnrner of Cerritos Avanue
and Anaheim Boulevdrd, 338 W. Cerritoa rvenua (Japanese Phye~i~~-Therapy and
aauna).
To permit a physio-therapy and sauna establishment with waiver ot minimum
numbez of parking apaces.
There was no one indicr~tin~ their presence in oppoaition to subjact request
and althouqh the sta~f report wns not read, it is referred to and mede a part
of the minutes.
William Adar , agent, steted he has had hie buainesP at ~24 S. Euclid for
eiqht ye.rs and has to move it l~ecauae of the Adult Entertainment Or~inance.
THE PUHLIC H~ARING WAS CLOSED.
Cnnonissioner Hushore clarified that the treatment rooms have draw curtains and
are not soun9-proafed boothe with doors.
r
~
82-5Q0
MINUTIlB, J1N11HSIM CITY PLANNING CGMMIBRION. SEPTF]+ls~R 20 , 1982
Mr. Adums clariti~d that the cliants sre buainee~se+en reterrsd there !or
mediaal treat~nent.
ACTION: Cotnmiseionar Kinq oPtered e- motion~ eeccyndecl by Coannisaioner Nerbst
an Md~OTION C1IRRIED. that th~ Anehei.n City Plnnning Comn-isaion hns ravi~wed the
proposel to permit e physio-therapy end $ei~ne establlAhmantercel. otilend r
minimum numk~er ot parking spncae on en irregularl y-ehepe p
consiatinq ot approxia~ntely 12.3 e+cren loceted at the sauthweat corner of
Cerritos
Cerritos Avenue end Anahei~^rove1therNeaativerDeclarationblr metheerequirement
Avenue~ and does hereby app g
to pregar.e an ~nvirorunentel imp+aat report on th~ basie thnt there would be no
eiqnif icent inditi-iduel. or cumula~tlve edveree envirunmental ia-pact due te the
approvel of this Negati.v~ Declnretion aince the l-n~tieim Generel Plen
deniqnet~e ~he subject property ~or conm~rcial pzof9asional lnnd uaee
coanmeneurate with the proposatr that no aonsitive environmentel impeate are
involv~d in Che propoealt the: the Initial Study eubmiLted by the petitioner
indir_ates no eignificnnt inaiv:.9ua1 or cwnulative adverae envi.ronmental
impactsi and that t.he Neqati:^ Declaration subst-~ntieting the Foregcing
findings is on file in the Cit~• of Anehoim Planning bepertment.
Commiss~.onez King offered a motion, soconded by Commigaioner Herbst and MOTION
CARRIED, thet the Anaheim City Planning Commies:.on dn~ae hereby qrant wai~ver of
codQ requirement ~n the r-~is of the aurroundinga and on the basia that
cuetomer neede at the com. ~rciel industrial complex will vary due to the
variety of buainese and perk demand wi.ll eeldom occur end cleniel woulc~ deny
subjACt propert; oE privileqes enjoyed by other proper.tiee in the same zone
and vicinity•
Annika Santalnhti, AoRistant Director for Zon~n g, axplained the minimum
diatance accozding to the new ordinance ia 40. 2eet from other adult
entertainmf=~b~hennorthern~propertyulinethwhi chtwoul~hprobablydelimineteran}o
feet away
other simila~ uses.
Commiseioner King offered Reaolution No. PCt32- 3 77 and moved for its passage
and adoption that th~ Anaheiw City ~'lanninq Co~-ieeic. h does hereby qrant
Conditional Use PeT*nit No. 2374 aubject tn petitioner's stipuldtion tliet thr
treatment rooma will have dzaw curtaina and wi 11 not be nhund-pzonf. with doora
and aubject to Interdepart~nental Conm~ittee recommendations.
Prior to voting on the reaolution, Commissioner Buehore eeked if t1~is
conditional use pF:rmit can be made non-trnnsferraUle with Jack White,
Aeaiatant City Attorney, indicnting tt-at could not be dor~e. Cammisaioner ICing
added thet the Cortiditinnal Use Permit shall expiro in three yer~rs.
On rall cell, the foregoing reac.lution was pa s r•9~~Y the following vote:
AYES: BC?UAS, BUSHORE, FRY, HERBST, 1CING. I~- CLAIRE, MC BURNEY
NOE8: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
~~
~ ~~
MI?~LiTaB, 11N11HF.'TM CITY PLANNZNCi COMIMI88ION~ l3~CPTI:MHER 20, 1982 82-501
. 7.
ICrTION NO. 82-83-8, W1IIVBR QF
PUALIC HEAAINa. OWNBR: ALFRED D. 1-ND JOSEPHINR P71IN0, 711 8. Seaah B:.vd.,
1-naheim. CA 92804. 110~N'T i ALFR~D P• P71IN0 7-ND JIM RODI(3, 711 S. Beec~ 81vd. ,
Anaheim, C1- 92804. Praperty deaaxibed aa a rec.tangularly-shaped parcel o!
land coneietinq ot approximately 0.88 acre, 71t 9outh Besah Boulavard (Home
Run Park).
RECLASSIFICI-TION R~~UESTt R&-A-43,000 t~~ CL
CONDI~IONIIL USE REQUESTs To expend en exieting batting cdqe fecility with
we-ivere ofs A) meximum structurel height, b) minimum landscdped eetb~ck, c)
minimutn aide and rear ynrd aetbacks and d) required eite screening.
There was no one indiceting tlieir presence in oppoeitian to sub~ect request
and alihough the staff report ~+ae not read, it ie ref~rred to nnd made e part
of the minutes.
A1 Paino and Jim Rodig, agents, were prasent to anewer. any ques~iona.
THE PUbLIC HEARINu WAS CT,OSED.
Mx. Paino re~ponded to Commis~ionar. Hushore that t}ie property to the south is
vacant, but will be developed eventually with condominiwna and a block wall
will be provided at that time and thay have not made any plens to provide a
wall.
Dean Sherer, Assc.~ciate Flenner, explained the waivAr pertaine to a portion of
the northern property 11ne which ebute R.4-A-43,000 zcned property, although it
ia improved with a vetesrinarian's office.
Mr. Paino etated they will providinq a wall elong the north progerty lina and
Mr. Rodiq explained there will be a six-fnot wall for the batting caqea but it
will not be riqht on the pxoperty line.
Reapondinq to Co~nmiasioner Barnea concerning landscaping, Mr. Paino explained
the waiver pertains to the aetback on Beach Boulevard bec-ause providinq the
required landscapinq will reduce their parking area. He explained landsceping
ie proposed on both sides of the parking lot and referred tu two palm trees in
the front and referred to another area under the existing siqn which could be
landscaped. He ~tipulated to provide landaraping in every possible area.
ACTION: Coaimissioner. La Claire offered a motion, seconded hy Coromiesioner
gouas and MOTION CAIt1tIED, that the Anaheim City Planninq Comnission has
reviewed the proposal to reclaesify subject property from the RS-A-43,000
(Residential, Aqriculturel) Zone to the GL (Commercial, Limited) Zone to
expand an Rxistinq battinq ceqe facility with waivera of maximum structural
heiqht, minimum landscaped setbaak, a~inimtwi side and rear yards eetback and
required ~ite screerainq on a rectanqularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of
app:oximately 0.88 acre, h ving n frontaqe of approximntely 113 feet on the
weat side of Beach Boulevard, having a maximum depth of approximately 340 feet
and beinq located approxin~ately 890 feet south of ~he centerline of Orange
Avenue and lurther described as 711 S. Beach Boulevardt and doe8 hereby
~
82-50Z
MINUT~B, I-N11N~IM CI'PY PLIINNINa COMMI88ION, 6BP'1'TMBER 20, 1982
epprova khe Negative Declaratian lrom Lha rsquirament to prspar. e an ilicant
environm~ntel impact r~pc~rt on th~ b+isis thet thAre would be no ~i~^rovel of
individual or aumulative advers• snvironmontel impect due to th• npp
thie Nec~etive Declax~etion sincs the 1-nshsim aenersl Plan deniynatos th.
sub jact prop~+rty !or gensrsl comaa~roial land u~tes connneneurate ~rith the
proposalt thet no eensi~ive anviranmental impacto °rtitiioner indiGatea no
proposal r thet tha Initial 8tudy ~ubmitta~i by the pe
signi~icant individuel or cumuiative adv~~e foregoinqefinding~iesonafilehin
the Naqativa Declaration eubsl:ant~T~ant.
the ^.ity of Anaheim Planning Dep
Cotnmiesioner Le Cl~+ire oftered Resoluc on No. PC82~1Commiasion~doosrhereby
paesage end adopCion that thF Anaheim 'ity Planning
qrent WeclneeiPi~ation No. e?-83-8 eubject to Interdepnrtmental Committee
reaomtnendatione.
On roll cell, the foreqoing resolution wae peaned by the followinq vote:
AYES: BOUAB~ sU3HORE~ FRY, HERBST~ KING, I.A CLAIRE~ MC BURNEX
NOE3 t NONE
ABSEN'1's NON~
Cocia-ieeioner Le C) ai re offered a r,u+tion, eeconded by Coera-iseioner Bouas and
M~Ipp~ ~pR~~p, thac tandA(d)eon the basienthatCde~niQliwauldcdepriveys bject
waivere (e)~ (b~~ ~ ~
property of privileg~a enjoY~d hY other properties in the sasne zone and
vicinity end further qranting waivare (e) and (d) on ~:he basis that the
nroperty to the nortt'! is devel~ped with a veterinar:.an clinic although it is
zoned for single-fnaiily residentiai lend uaes.
Cou~cniesionex La Cleire offered Reeolution No. PC82-179 and abaved fox its
paseaqe and adoption that the Anaheim City Planning Coau~-lasion does hcreby
qrant Conditional Use Pw~~ e='~88ibleuthr ughouthChe~siteoand,subjectltoion
to provide lnndecapirq
InterdepertmQntel Coaimittee recommendations.
On roll call, thc fc~raqoing r.esolution wea passed by the following vote:
AYEB: HOUAS r BUSHORE ~ FRY ~ HERBb"I' ~ KING, LA CLAIRE • 1"1C BURNEX
NOE3: NONE
AgSENT: NONE
.__........~..;:.,~~,,;,::~,,r •
'~ '~..:~ ~
MINUTE3~ ANAHSIM CITY rLANNING COMMI98ION, R1SP'PBMH~R 20, 1982 A2-503
ITBN! NO. 8. EIR NECil1TIV8 DSCLARATION, WAIVER OF COGE RSQUIR~NT AND
nA1~f1TTTANAL tisL PERMIT N0. 2376
PUBLIC HEARING. OWN1~R: 1~NANEIM SCHOOL DxSTRICT OF ORANGE COUNTY~ 412 E.
Broa~~vay, Anal'ie~m~ G- 9280S. Property dRecribeA ae a rectanqulerly-ehapod
parcel o! land coneistinq of approx:nately 7.8 ecree, 2000 We.t Ball Road (Ke+y
Elementery ~chool).
To permir a privdte college in en existing echool facility with waiver of
minimum nwnber of pnrking spacea.
~here na no one indiceting their preaence in apposition to aubject reqiaest
and althouqh the etaff repnrt wes n~t rear7, Lt ir referred tn end mede a part
of the minutee.
Jim Brier, 3uperintendent, Anaheim 5chool District, 412 E. Broadway, ~naheim,
was preeent to dnewer any questions.
Dr. Dc~nald Hecht, Preaident, Californfa College of Technoiogy, stnted the
subject el.ementary achool (Fzencia Scott Key) has heen closed since Junet that
a committee waa formed to determine the best use of. the achool and t}iey
recommended educationel p«rposes• Regarding the perking, he expl.ained they
heve reviewed the pYane and feel if they are allowe~t to count aompact car
spac~s, they ca.~ provide 150 spaces dnd in addition, there are 5 acrea or~ the
north which :ould be develc.ped for perking, if necessary. He ~xpleinec~ they
initially plan to have eighty studencc attending different sessiona and the
maximum enrol.tment anticipatQd would be fi~e hundred studenta with no m~rp
than 250 ~':udenta on campus at eny one time.
Dr. Hecht referred to Condition No. 4, roquiring that the eaeterly drivewdy be
closed and atated they would :ike a delay in complying a~ith that because the,y
need it for staff and visitor parking.
THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED.
Dean Sherer, Aasociate Planr~r, explained the parking requirements are based
on the square footaqe of individual classzooma, not the number of atudents
Dr. Hecht explained the rnaximum enrollment anticipated is 50A students, but
all the students would not be gresent at the snme time and there would never
be more than 250 studen*s there at any one time.
Commissioncsr Herbst stated he wae concerned becuuse there is a parking probler~
at moat collegeaj however., he renlizea theze ie additional property which
could be developed for parking on thie~ eite. He asked if the Parks and
Recreation Department would be usinq this facility for any of their activities.
Mr. drier stat.ed if necessary, the northern portion ot the croperty could be
paved and used for parkinq and he would make that stipulation.
Dr. Hecht atatsd they have lease3 tha entire site for the college and the
lacilities will not be uaed by anyone else, includinq the playground.
~
MINUTFS, 11N~NEIM CTTY PL)-tiNINO COMMI$SION, BEPTEMBER 20, 1982 82-~04
Coc~naisrioner H~zbst stated he would like to see epproval aonditioned upon
review of th~ perking situe~ion when enrollm~ent r~ach~s nara than a certain
ntunber o! etudents per ssanion.
Jeck White, Aaaietent City Attornay, euggeeted tha limit be pleced on the
numb~r of etudenta enrolled end when ik reachea thek limit, sdditione.l parkinq
1~e required.
Reepondinq to Commisefoner 2ci.ng, Paul Sinqer, Tratf~.c Engineer, explainAd aa
lonq sa tha prop•:rty 1A uaed for a echool and is owned by the echool district.,
tha City has no opportunity to make cormnents on the accesar however, since
thie use requires n conditional uee permit end since thie particuler drivewsy
has been a problem, thia ie the City's opportunlty to corroct that prablem by
cloeinq the drivewny and requirir,g thec on-site circulation be provided. He
nleo recoannended that the treffic bignal aeeesement fee be required on the
entire etructure.
Reepondinq to Commiesi~ner Ln Claire, Nlz. Brier expleined public hearinqa were
held reqarding the use ot' this school fncility and there wae no opposition to
the recommendatian of the commi~tee that it be used for educational purposes.
He stated the neighbors were notified and had reptesentation on the committe~e.
Mr. Brier stated they would have no objection ta the <lriveway beinq cloaed.
It wne noted the lease is for 5 yeers with optiona.
Coaaniasioner La Claire stnted the Commieeion is concerned about the parking
because there have been parking problema caueed by other colleqes on local
streeta and the Connnisaion would like to come up with a plan to eliminate
atudent parki:ig on thQ public streete so that the school will not impact the
neighborhood.
Cocnmissioner Her~°t asked how long they anticipate b~fore reaching maxi.mum
enrollment. He asked if the Commi.asion car. review the parking yearly.
Dr. Hecht atated they would like to redch the maximwn dnrollment as q+iickly ae
possible.
Jack SPhite explained this ia the due process hearing and suqgested limitin~q
the permit t~ the maximum number of atudents enrol.led either for total
sessions or any one seasion.
Cheirman Fry suqgested the limit be thht the permit has to be renewed when
enrollment reeche~ 150 atudents per eny one seseinn.
Commissioner La Claire indicated concern beca~ise some studente would have
laboratory classes in addition to regular alees and Dr. Hecht stated there may
be an overlnp of students because of laba, but not for a very long perioc of
time.
~ .~-~ ~~
MINUTEB, ANAHEIM CITY PLJINNING CONIMI88ION~ SEPTEMBER 20, 1982 82-505
1-CTIGNi Cortani~tioner Herbst olfer~d a motion, ssconded by Commieeioner K~.ng
and MOTION CARRIED, that the Anaheim City Planninq Commiosion hae rsviewad Che
propusal to permit a private colleqs in an exiating ^ch~ol ~acility with
wnivar of minimum numbe`' Of pax'klRg spaces on a r•ctsngularly-ehapec F.ar~~1 of
lend consisting ~f approxiu,w*ely 7.8 acres, havinq a lrontaqe o! agproxir.~~cely
446 leat on the south aide ot Bali Rosd and lurther d~acribed aa 2000 W. Bnll
Raad (Key ElemantAry School)t and does hAreby approve the NeqativR Declnretion
trom the requiremant to prepare an environmental impact report on the basis
thet there would be no siqnificr~nt individual or cumulntive adverse
environmantal impact dua to tha epproval of thia Negative Declaration since
the Anaheim Genaral Plan dasignates the~ eubject property !or elamentary school
:aite which is commensurete with the propoealr that no senaitive anvironmental
lmpects are involved in the proposel~ that the Initial 3tudy eubmi.tted by tho
petitloner indicates no signi~icent individual or cumulative edvazqe
nnvironmental impactat and tl~at the Negetive D~claration subetantiating the
foreqoinr~ findinqA ia on file in t!~e Gity of ~heim Plenninq Dcpartment.
Commisaion~er King offered Reaolution No. PC82-180 end maved for it9 paseage
end adoptiun that the Aneheim City Planninq Commiesion d~ea hereby qrant
Conditione]. Use Permit No. 2376 for a mnximum enrollment ~f 150 etudents at
any one sesaion and eubject to Interdepar.tmental Comtnittae recomm~sndations
inc:ludinq Condition No. 4 requiri.ng th-~ easterly drivewvy be cloeQd and
including Conditi~n Na. 3 khat the traffic signal asseasment fee be paid.
On roll call, the foreg~i.ng resoluti~n was p~sased by the fo~lowing vote:
AYES: SOUAS, BUStfORE~ FRY, HERBST, KING, LA CLAIFtE, MC BURNEY
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
~ro vrr_nTTVF nFr7.ARATIdN I~ND COT'1QITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 2377
PUBL"~ HEARING. OWNER: DUNN PROPERTIES, 28 Brookhollow Drive, Santa Ar:a, CA
92702. AGENT: FLOYD L. FARANO, 2555 E. Chapman, Suite 415, Fuliprtan, CA
92631. Property described aa a rectangularl}-shaped parcel of land con$iating
of approximetely 5.2 acres located ~.t the northeast corner of La Palma Avenue
and Brasher Street, and 1.1 acree l~~cated r+t the northweak. cornex of La Palma
Avnue and Braeher Straet.
To permit a planned unit industrial service center with sales and aervicee of
new and used automobiles.
There was no one indicating their presence in opposition to subjeck request
And althouqh the staff rconrt was not read, it ia referred to and made a p~rt
of the minutes.
Commissioner Kiny declared a cor.flict of intierest as defined by Anaheim City
Plenning Comm.iaeion Reaolution No. PC76-157, adopting a Conflict of Interest
Code for the Plenning Comaniesion, and Government Code Section 3625 et seq., in
that he orms coaimon gtoak in Paciffc Lightinq which owns Dunn Properties and,
pursuant to the provisions of the above codea, declared thnt he was
withdrawinq trom the haaring in connection with Conditional Use Percait 2377
and wouLd not take paxt in o~ther the diacussion or the voting thereon, and
has not diacussed thie matter with any member of the Planninq Comnaission.
Thereupan, Cammiaeioner King left the Council Chamber.
~ ,~. ~
~?:
,;
MINU'^3~8. 11N1-HEIM CITY PLANNING ~OMMI38ION, SEPTiCMBBR 20, 1982 82-506
Floyd Fareno, ~+ztorney, 2555 ~. Gnepenan, Full~rton, axpleined it fa propoeed
that twenty new eutomobilea would be kegt on the ~.rea-ieea an nn everaga ba41s
with tan vehiclee being ino!.~fa tha fecil.ityt however, it ie poesible e denler
wauld recaive hia antire monthly allotmer~t at one time and there would be more
vehiclea thera on e tamporery basist and thet they enticipata 15 to 25 used
vahiclee would Ue kept outside elonq the~ nUrth property lina between this
dealarship and the recreationat vehicle manutacturiny Facilitias.
Mr. Fareno etated he expleined to his clients thnt used care in this
induatriel zone would not be conaidered by the Cammieeion and City Council to
be in the beat intereet oP the City and eugqested that there not be eny used
carei howevez, the Mercedea Senz ~ort,pany req~iires ~het any used Mercedes
traded in has to be serviaed end diepoaed of by n Mercedes dealer for quality
contral. He expl+~ined thare would not be any other type o~ uaed cnr eold at
this lacation. Mr. Farano paesed out information to the Commisaion pertaining
to the income, hours of operatinn and trafttc And introduced Ray Corbin and
Dave Chriatian of Corbin YdmaPuehi, Architects and R~y Ch~~~•mech of Dunn
PropArtips who ero prasent to answer dny questions.
Mr. Farano eteted the question fs whether or not the retail sale or servicing
of eutomobilea represent9 an encroachment into the industriel arear that thia
rc~quest wae oriqinally p~.-:sented under Reports and Recommendat.tons requesting
an amendment to Code to permit this kind of use in the industrinl zone and the
Commission denied that request. He atated the C~de pro~.ldes for retail eales
and servicing of a~ltomobiles within a planned unit development on not less
than 5 acrest and that the sales and service pnrtion nf this operation
repreaents 438 of the ~ot~l square footage of the property and 358 of the
building apace and the area devoted to retail sal9s ie npproximately 2~ of the
tutal land (43?5 aq. f~.) snd 58 of the building area. Hp stated relativ~ to
'he sq~iere footage involved and the business involved, this would be s very
icw density uae and referred to the infonaation ~ertaining to traffic end
tr~uqht the 210 tripe fiqure ehould be reduced by ~ne half. He added La
Palma, at this locatian, is a four-lane r~ad with a continuous left-turn
po~~ket and a curbed lane on both sidea and he did not think that even 210
tr:ps per day could be considered a a-ajor impact.
Mr. Farana stated people shapping for a Mercedes Benz are not window ahoppere
and hr:~^e~9es are not usually sold on the apot but az~e ordered, s~o there would
not be a ~arqe amount of foot traffic• He explained he had traveled in that
area on different occasions and traffic was light at those hours when this
operation would heve its heaviest impact betwPen 7 a.m• and 8 p.m., and
traffic counted this morning hetween 8:00 and •'~ a.m• showed there eere 28
eastbound cars and 60 westbound cnrs.
Mr. Farano atated there will k~ no siqne in the windows nnd this w+ll not look
like a used car lot and only two or three vehicles wo+ald be on dispiay in the
showro~m. He ex~la.ined thei•e are three Mercedee Senz dealera in Oranqe County
and thare is a need Eor a sPrvice facility in thia areas ~hat there are about
threQ hundred and fifty of these vehicles sold per ~nonth end about 509 of
thoee sales are mede without trade-ins. Mr. Fareno etated he surveyed parking
lota of two buildings in that area ~,d came up with a ratio of 1 Mercedes Benz
for every 5,400 equare feet of office space and usinq that formula, there
would be approximately 200 Mercedes located in the area between Kraemer and
Lakeview.
MINUTEB, ANIIHEIM CITY PLI1NNIt~G COMMI88ION, SEPTEMBBR 20, 1982 82-507
TtiE PUBLIC Hffi1lRING W118 CLOS$D.
Commie4l~ner Narbat stated Mr. Farano has juet clescribed any svereqe
autamobila agency in Anahoim and ref~rred to tha ordinance requirinq that uaes
in the induetrial area muet aervice the induatridl areal and that he ie aure
thera ara pe~ple who ovm Mercedes B~nt in the erea who would like to hsve the
sarvice nv~ileble, but he Pelt thie would open tho door tor all kinde o!
automobile dealerships in the area. He etated there are other industrial
azeae in the City where eemi-comimexcial u.ee hnve been d110WAd auch ae on
Ratella, but thie is an aren the Cemmieaion is trying to protect.
Mr. F+~rano stated t~e undergtande thiA ie a senaitive subjac~. in thc City of
Anaheim, but he felt the Commisaian could be comfortable wikh approval becauae
this ie e uee cantemplated by the ordinance eubject to approval of a
conditianal use parmit. He did not think there ehould be e problem reqarding
a precedent beinq set because of the eize of the ;-., :el end the percentage of
th~ area beinq ueed for retail selea, gtc. He nc~.ed Exer_utive Mot~r Homes
sells parts to the public.
Commisaioner Herbst pointed out the motor homea are manufactured on-aite hut
the MorcQdea vehiclea will not be manufactured herR.
Mr. Farann explained the dealership will be servicing automobiles and that
r~nyone who owns n motor home can purchase parta from Executive. Respondinq to
Commisaloner La Claire ae~ to whether or not other commercial sitea in t.he
Anaheim Hills area were considered, Mr. Farano explained several other sltes
were seriously coneidered and they hnve enalyzQd all tlie iseues auch as the
income of the poople in the areA, the type of residences, etc• and also any
Mercedea Benz de~lership muat be 10 miles away Prom ~,ny other dealership and
there ia a dealer in Buena Park.
Commissioner La Claire stated ahe is svre the aervice is needed in that area,
but the Commiasion is concerned witti keepi^~ the induatrial erea free of
retail sales~ that ceztain areas have been set aeide for ccxi~mercial usea, but
the Commiasien would lik.~ to keep this area pristine in order to attract auch
induetrial uaera as Warner.•-Lambert, etc. She reterr.ed to the wholesale car
dealership on Tustin and noted there will be other similar requests if thia ia
grAnted, and only allowing Mercedes Aenz dealerships would ~e a kind of
prejudice.
Mr. Farano atated aqein he thought thA ord~nance conte~-plated the possible
preaence of retail sales in the industrial area. Commissioner La Claire
poin~ed out the ordinance req~iires that the uaes must be directiy rElated to
the industrial azga.
Commiesioner Herbst atated he sat ~on the Commiseion during the writinq of the
ordinance and there was never any intent to permit eutomobile aqencies in the
industrial area. He etated the eubcitted information regarding the sales tax,
etc. is very impressive ~nd the City Council iaay be able to conaider it, but
the Coamaiesion must conaider land uee only.
s
~«..
,~ B
~ ~ ~9
82-508
MINUTBB, P-l'i1WExM CITY PL111QNING COl9~'II$BION, BRPTEMB~R 20. 1992
ACTIONi Caanni~eioner Herbst ot!•red u motic , saconded by Cooaniesioner Hc~a~w
an Md'-""'pTlpt,l CARgI~p (Cotamissionar 1Cinq absent), thalannedAunitiinduatrialnninq
Commission has raviewed tha propo4al to parmit a p
4arvic~ center with aelee and rervice o! new and uAed automobiles on a
xeotengulsrl,y-shaped pazcel o! lend noncisting o! approximately 5.2 acrea
locate4 at the northeast corner a! La Pnlcaa Avenue and Braeher Stre~t and a
rectanqu7.arly-ohaped parcel o! land conei~tinq o! 1.1 ncre locato~ove the west
corner o! La Palmn Avenue and Brasher Str~ett andaae ~nhenvironmental impncr
Negative Declaration ~r~~ thc: requiznment to prep
report on the baeie th~t there would be no signif~centrovnlVOtuthlerNeqative
cumult+tive adverae environmentel impact due to the app
Declaration eince the Anel~eim General Plen deeignates the eubject pr~perty for
gene~ral industria~ lend usee commensurate witl: the proposalt that no seneitive
environmentel imracte a.re involved ir the proposalt thet the tnitial Study
eubmitted by thp pet:itionei indicatea no signif~cant individunl or cumulative
aaveree AnvironmAntal impactat and thet the Negati~~e Declaration
subatnntiating the foregoing findings ia ~.ile in khe City of Anaheim
Planning DeZ~artment.
Commiesioner He~bst offered Resolution No. PCP2-181 and maved fox ita paesage
anc] adoption that the Anaheim City Plenninq Commiesion doea hereby deny
Conditianel Uae Permit No. 2377 on the basis thet en automobile agenay would
be a definite encroachment into the ind~~striAl area.
On roll cA11, the Paregoing r.esolution was pasaed by the followinq vote:
AYES: SOUAS. BUSHORE. FRY. HERHST, I.A CLAIFtE~ MC BURNEY
NOES: NONL
ABSEt~fI' : KING
Dean Sherer, Asscciate Planner, presented ~he written ~•iqht tp nppeal the
Planning Commission's decisio~ within 22 de~ys to the City Councll.
icEC-.3S: 'Phere was a 10-minute recess at 3:20 ~.m.
gp~~p~~gp: The meetinq was reconvened at 3:30 p•m•
Commiasioner K'ig returned to the Council Chamber•
. ... . ~ ~
~.
~ ~-V~ ~~
MINU9~gg, 1W11EiEIM CITY PLI1NNIt~(i COMMISSION, SEPTISMHSR 20, 1y8~ 82-509
ITEM NO. 10. $IR NSt~~'1TIVE DBCJ.AR7ITION, W112V~R ~~: ^.nDR REQUIttRN1ENT 1WD
CnNDITIONIIL US$ PRRMTT N0. 237H
FUBLIC HBARING. OWNSR: YRINEO 11ND C6I.ESTINA YLNISNCO, 1941 B. C9ntmr 8treet,
1lnaheim, C1- 92804. AGBNTi JEFFRSY C. :1ON880N, 31305 Paseo Del Sol, i,ec~una
Beach, CA 93677. Proparty de~cribed as an irreqularly-eheped parcel of land
cc.neieting oF approxime-tely 0.63 acre, 1941 ~aet Center Street (I~aciende
Chrietian Reet Home).
To expand en existing reet home fecility with waivere of maximum etructural
height and n-inimtun rear yerd setback.
There wae one peraon in~iiceting his preeence i.n opposition ta aubject requemt
and althouqh the etaff report was not read, it is refPrred ta and made a part
of the minutes.
Jeff Jone~~an, agent, explained the plarie are to construct a two-etory,
3,000--iquare foo~ rest hane and add on to two exieting buildinqs for a total
of 3~~ rooms.
G1en Burchett sta±ed he owne the property et 12' N•~rth State College, AnahAim,
and that this rest home backs up to the eide of ~~is property. He sCated he
r~ally doea not object to the requast but would like a hiqher wall bet.waen the
p:operties. He noted the existinq we~ll is about 5-1/2 feet hi3~ti. He stated
he has had bad experiences with the Villaqe Motel which is a two-story complex
and trash blowa onto his property, etc. He state~ he is tryinq to eell his
propPrty which is vacant and ic+ concerned thet the subject property is an
eyesore.
Mr. Jonsson stated it soun~+s likes Mr. E..rchett's oppoaition io w~ the
two-atory apartment complext that they era pro~+oaing an addlti~n to e
one-atory buildinq clo:sest to hia property and the two-story structure will be
about 30 feet away from hie rroperty lin~e.
THE ~UBLIC I:EARING WAS CLOSED.
Mr. Jonsaon ~ltrifiei the exietinq wall ia 5-1/2 feet hig~l an~ the addition
adjgcent t:o ~.r. Burcrett's property is one story and they will re cleaninq up
the area and dem~lishinq che wood ahacke. He present~d photoqraphs of the
property•
t'rnr¢~tasionar Bushore a ~ert~ined that Mr. Burchett's property is vacant with
an abandoned boarded-up adobe etructure. Mr• Burchett po~nted out the rest
home pzoperty is not landacape~ and the roof has been patched and he would
appreciate anything that could be done to improve the appearance frum hia
property.
Cammiseioner Buehore etatc~d he thouqht reqL±ring a higher wall adjacent to the
vacant property which is not beinq properly maintained wauld be nn
unreasonablcs requeat.
Mr. Jona~on indicated there is a wooden fence between the properties.
Comaaiasioner La Clairg gtated this property ie really in bad shape and asked
whati the plane are for improving it.
~ ' ~~
MINUT~B, AN?~HEIM CITY PJ.IINNING COMMI58IONr s$pTfl+IB"R 20, 1982 82-510
Mr. Jonsaon ateted perhap~ they could provide e~me lanAgcnping in the perkNay
and Antry and Cheirmdn Fxy etated the maintenance of the property leevea a lat
to ba deaired nnd just cleaning up th~ weede end qetting rid af tha shdcko
wi11 improve it end Conuniasien would like eseurence trom someone that it will
be aleened up.
Mr. Jonsson etated the exieting ahacke will be removed end they will puc
landscaping in the front with Gommiseionor Buahore Aski~g thet e etipuleti.un
be made thet the landscapinq will be irrigeted and mni~teined.
Conanir~sione• stnted he thaught a block wnll should be rec;uired adjecent
to thu motel ,mmiaeioner La Claire ~qread. She stated perhaps if the
petitioner eqreN,. to provide a block wall end eome landscapinq in the 8-foot
dree between the buildinga end the exiating wall, thi~ rPquest could be
grented.
ACTION: CommiQQ{oner Buahore offered a mot.ion, seconded by Canmiseioner Boua3
anA MOTION CARRIED, thnk tho Aneheim City Plenning Commiseion has reviewed the
proposal to expand un existinq rest homQ facility with weivers of nu+ximum
Qtructural height and minimum rea~r yard aetback on an irreqularly-shaped
parcel of land c~nsisti.ng of approximately 0.63 acre, having a frontage of
ap~roximately 130 feet on the north eide of Center Street and further
deacribed as 1941 Fast Center Streett and doea hereby appz'ove the Negative
Declaration frcxn thp rEquirement to prepare an environmental impact report on
the basis that there would be no significant individual or cumult~tive adveree
environmental impact due to the nppr~val of this Neqative DeclArati.an since
the An,-.heim General Pla~ desiqnates the c~ubject property for commercial
professional land uses ~ommenaurate with the proposalr that no sensitive
environnental impacts are involved in tr~e proposalj that the Initial Study
submitted by the petitloner indicates no rsiqnificant individual or cumulative
adverse environme~tal impactat and that the Neqative 1M claration
subatantiating the foreqoing findings is on file in the City of Anaheim
Planninq Department•
Commissioner Btishore offered a motion, seconded by Commissioner Bouas and
MO'PION CARRIEDr that th~ Anaheim City Planni~g Commission doea hereby qrant
waivera of code req~lirement on the basis of the irreqularly-shaped parcel and
denial would deprive subject property of privileges enjoyed !~y other
r~•opertiea in the same zone and vicinity.
Commissioner Bushore offered Resolution Nn. F~C82-182 and movecl for its passaqe
and adoptian that the Anaheim City Planniny Commission does hereby grnnt
Conditional Use Permit No. 2378 subject to the pet~cioner'R stipulation to
provide landacaping on the north property line and a block wall o~~ the west
prope•*_y line arid also the landacaping installed shall be properly irrigated
and maintained and that the existinq structures wtll be brought up tn minimum
c~de xequirementa.
Catnmissioner Hsrbat asked that the landscaping required include trees on
20-foot centers thet would qrow to a ininimum height of ten feet.
Cociml.ssioner King asked how aiuch time ehould be allowed fur the conditiona to
b~ met with Dean Sherer explaininq that the condition would include that the
improvements ehall be provided prior t~~ occupancy.
~ '~;~~ ~
MINUTRB, 11Nl~HLIM (:1'PY P. ANNING COMMI8:'ION, S1~PTSMlAER 20, 1gN2 82-511
Coennie~ioner La Claire eugqoeted that th• landscaping plana b~ Approved b,y ths
Plenninq Department rather then the Planning Canm+ierion etipuleting whet
~hauld be planted.
Jack White clarified L•hat tha resolution will inclu3e a condition thet the
landecapi~~q will he approved by the Planninq I~partment•
On roll cell, the £oreqoing reaolutian wes paesed by the followlnq votes
AYE3t HOUAB~ BUSHORE, FRY, HLRHST, KI:~G, I.A CL~AIRE, MC BURNEY
NOESs NONE
ABSENTs NONE
Jack White, Asaistant City Attorney, prenented the written riqht to n~penl the
Planninq Commieeion'e decision within 22 deye ko the City Council.
ITEM NO. 11. EIR NEGATIVE D~CLARATION AND VARIANCE NU._3z87
PUBLIC HEARING. OWNER: MIKE AND 5U3AN IIUCKT~EY, 3501 ~. La Pelmn Hvenue,
Anaheim, CA 92806. Pr~perty d~acrik~+d as n rectanqulazly-ahape~ par~;~l r,f
lend coneietin~ of approximately 3.~ a:res, 4800 E. Le Palma.
Waivera of minimum number of perking apacee and maximum fence height to permit
a sel!-storage factlity.
There wes no or.e indicating their pzesence in oppositior~ to aubject request
and +slthou~h the staff report wes ~ot read, it i~ referred to and mede a part
of the minutes.
Ji~n Church, Public Storage Incorporated, °~0 S. Fair Uaks Avenue, P•zsadena
911q9, owner/operator, explained they will leaee enclosed parking ~~^es to
the public and for security rurposes ac.:eas ia throuqh a digital controlled
qate and the tenant muat enter a key-coded number which includes the builuit.?
number, spacQ number and two digita of his own choice and the person enterinq
would be photoqraphed an~ the photogr.aph would be dated And timed and the
persan would have to go throuqh the seme pr~cedure when he leavea the
facility. f!e explained there will also be two managers who wi].1 live on the
site. He stated they preaently own an~l operete 200 0~ thege fecilitiee nnd
they are designed to accomn-odate parking fcr their tenants a~nd the public. He
stated they are requesting the parking waiver on the barsis that this ia not a
qeneral warehou~ae but a mini-vcarehousej thet a qeneral warehouee employs a lat
more people and they will on].y hava two employees. He staCed atrict
applic~ti~n would require 68 parkinq spaces and if they compl.ied with that
requirement, it would result in over 50 unused parking spaces within the
projPct. He stated the fence heiqht variance is requeated in order to provide
security.
THE PUBLI~ HF:ARING WAS CL03ED.
Mr. Church clarified for Comtnissionar La Claire that there nre eiqht parking
apaces outside the fence for ataff oz if someone wants to stop and pay their
rent before enterinq the premises and aleo there will be no outdoor starage at
any time.
~ ~
k,.:
~ .~ ~
MINUTEB, 1-N7-HSIM CITY PLI~NNING COMMISSIQN, SEPTI~MBBR 20, 1992 g2-512
ACTION: Coannia4loner Ln Claira ~ftered a motion, s~con~led by Commisrioner
8ouam and MO-rION Cl~RRIBD, that tha l~r-ahelaa City Pl.anninq Con~miseion har
reviewed the proposal to permit e- eel!-stornge tacility with ceretakers' unit
with waivara nf eninimum number o! park.ing •paces end tnaximum tence helgh~ on a
rectengularZy-shaped pazcel o! land consisting ni epproximataly 3.5 ncrea,
havinq a lruntage o~ epproxia-ately 340 leat on the south side Of LA Palma
Avenua and turth~r deacribad ae 48Q0 Le Pnima 1lvenuet nnd doas hereby appruve
the Neqative D'cleretion from the requirement to prepare en envi,ronmental
impact re~ort an the basie that there would be n~ eignilicant individual or
cumulative ~dverse environmente: impact due to the npproval of thie Naqative
pecl~ration since the Mnheim Genernl Plen deaiqnatne the eubjact propurty !or
general induetrinl land usee comm~+nsurata with the propc~sa~~ that no sensitive
er~vironmental i.mpacts are involved in the propoealt that the InitiAl Study
suhmitted by the petitioner indiratee no eignificant individuAl or cutnulntive
adverae environmental impactat and that the Neqative becieretion
aub3Cantiating the ioraqoing iirtdinga ie on file in the City oE Anaheim
Planninq Depextment.
Commiasioner Ld Claire offered Reaolution No. PC82-183 end movod for its
paasaqe t~nd adoption that the Anaheim City Plenninq Commiasion does hereby
qrant Vari~nce No. 3287 on the baais that the petitioner demonstrated thAt a
h~rdship exiats duR ta the unique proposed uae ds a mini-warehouoe which would
only have two employees and granting waiver b) on the baeis that the propoaed
uae requ.ires a higher fence for security and deniel would depr~ve eubject
property of a privilege enjoyed by other propert.ies in the anme zone and
vicinity and subject to Interdepar~anent~l Committee recoauaendetions.
On roll call, the foregoing resolution was passed by the foXlowing vote:
AyES: BOUAS~ BUSHORE, FRX, HERB3T, l~ING, LA CLAIRE, MC BUHI~IEY
NOES: NONE
ABSENTs NONE
Couaniseioner Bu~hore left the meeting at 3:55 and did not return.
~ _ .._~.~ d:~.~: -
~, . A
~~ ~
-~.1
MINUTBS, AN7-NEIM CITY PLANTiTNCi COMMI288ION, BEPTEMB6R 20 , 1982 82-51 3
ITBM N0. 12. EIR NSGIITIVE DECL7IRATION P-Np V7-RIANC$ N0. 3294
PUBLIC HffiARING. OWNER~ CLYDE B. ANL~ JOAN M. SCHLUI~ , 616 Parelte H' lle
Drive, l~nnheim, C1~ 92807. Propsrty descrl,bed ae An ir.regulerly-shaped percel
ot lnr,d conelatinq o! approximately 5.3 acrea, 616 Peralt• Hille Drive.
Weiver o! minimwm lot w,dth to eetoblish a 5-lot, R5-H6-43,000(3C)
rsingle-family zone aubdivieion.
There wae n~ one indicatin~.J their presence i~ oppoaition to eubject requeet
and elthouqh the et~ff re~,c~rt wes n~t r~ad, it ie reforred to end made a pert
o! the minutea.
Cal Queryal, aqent, AnncA1 Enqineorinq, wns present to aner-er rny quoetions
and expleined they will be requeating n tract map approvel leter..
THE PUBI~IC HEARING WAS CLOSED.
ACTIpN: Cotnmiaeioner McBurney oFfered a motion, aeconded by Cormnissioner
Bouas and MOTZON CARRIEA, that the Ana-haim City PJ.enning Commiasion hae
.•eviewed the praposa.l to eatablieh a 5-1ot, Ii3-HS-43,000(SC) sinqle-family
zoned subdivision with waiv~r of minimua~ lot Midth on an irregulnrly~ ahapad
pe~rcel of land consistinq of apQroximately 5.3 acrea, heving epproximate
frontages of 332 feet on the north aide af Peralta Fiills privP and GO t~eet on
the south si~e of. Cerre Viate Drive and further deacribed a8 616 Peraltn Hille
Drivei and does hereby approvG tho Ndgativa Declaration from the requirement
to prepare an environmentnl inpect report an the beeie that there would be no
signif.icant indivi.duel or r~ulative edvec~e environmental impact due to thc~
appr~val of this Neqative Declaration since the Anaheim General Plan
deBiqnates the sub ject property tor hilleide low denolty reaidentiel land usea
commeneurate with the prop~sal; khat no sensitive envirc~mental impricta a.e
involved in the proposalt that the Initiel Study aubmittda by the petitioner
indicates no siqnificant ir.dividual or cwnulative edverae environmental
impactar and that the Negntive Declaration subat~-ntieting the foregoing
findinqs is on file in the City of Anaheim Planninq pepartment.
Commisaioner McBurney offered Resolutior No. Pr82-184 and moved for its
paseage and ~doption tt, ~t the Anaheim City Pl.anninq Con~nission does hereby
grant Variance No. 329~ on the basis of khe unuaual el~ape and the topoqraphy
of subject property and eubject to Interdepartmentel Co~mittee zecaamendationa.
On roll c~ll, th~ foreqoing resolution vas passed by the followinq vot~:
AYES: HOUAS, FRY, HERBST, KING, LA CLAIRE, MC BURNEY
NOESt NONE
ASSENT: BUSHORE
MINUT88, ANI-tZEiM CITY PLANNIN3 COMMI88IQN. 8lPT~MlI~R 7~, 1982 82-514
ITSM NA. 13
RE ORT8~1-ND AaCOl~Q4ENq11'~L'IONS
~._ -
Ata!! rsportt on the following w~re presented but not rcad:
A. CONDITIOZIAL U98 PERMIT N0. ~104 - Request i'~r exceneion of tia-e from
G~orqe T~ Nichc~ls !or property laca~ed st 919 Sauth Knott 8treet (The
1~rwnch Querter 1 •
11CTIONr C.ommissioner K1nq otfared e motion, second.~d Uy Comonisaioner
ilo~ b k end MOTION CAF.RIED, thnt the Aneheim Ctty Planning Commiaelon
doee heroby grent e one-year ext.enoion oP time for C~nditional Uee
Permit No. 2104 to expire on Septea~ber ?. 1983.
B. RECLASSIFIC11T10N NO. 80-81-8 - Requegt ~or. extension of time from
Daniel K. K. Chnng/Chanq Development Group for pro~rty et 2755 Ball
Road .
AC'PIONs CortanisRi.oner King offered e mar.i~n, aecunded by Commiseloner
Hert,nt and MOTION CARRISD, that tho Ane~h~im City Planning Cammienion
doos horeby grant a retroactive exte~~sion nf time to Reclaesificetion
No. 80-81-f! to expire on Septcmber H, 1983.
C. RECLA3SIF'ICATION NO. 80-81-10 AND V'1RIA~tiCL NO • 3171 - Requeat for nn
extenaion of time from Jeae Surrougha, Mas~nic Buildinq Aaeociet.ion
o~ M~heim, propert; located on the north side of Lincoln Avenue and
395 feet on the gouth si.de of Chartres Ftreet, dpproxia-etely 355 feet
east af the c~nterline of Harhor B~ulevard.
Comrt-ieeioner Yinq otfered a motion, seconded by Ccxmaieaioner Herbst
end MOTION CARRIEA that the AnaFieim City Planninq CamR-isaion does
hereby grAnt retroactive one-year extenaions of time for
Reclaeeilication No. 90-81-10 end Variance No. 3171 to ~xpire on
September 8 , 1983.
OTHBR DZSCUSSION:
Canmiseioner La Cleire indiceted ehe would like to establish a Coamiisaion
policy pert,dinl.ng to traffic studies for new motels or motel additions in the
Disrnsylanc~ area with ]-nniks Santala-hti explnining that the new parkinq
arc~inance will cover the parkinq study necess+ity.
p~pJptTRNMENT: Thera being no further buainesa Comm-ieaioner King offered a
motion, seconded b~- Com~isaianer Hexbst a.nd MOTION C7IRRIED, that
the meet~ng be adjourned.
Tha meetinq wes adjourned at 3s57 p•m•
Reapectfully aubmitted,
~v~, ~ 1~~~l~-~ a~~
lJ
Edith L. Harrie, Secretery
Anahein- City Planning Com~nisaion
H:LH s lsa