Minutes-PC 1983/01/24RSfiULAR M~ETING OF TH$ ANANRIM CITY PLIINNINa COMMISBION
RBfiULAR MlSETING The re-qular maeting o! the Anahoim City Plenning
Commisaion wae celled to nrder by Chairman Fry at 1Or00
e.m., Jnnuary 24, 1983, in the Council Chambmr, a quorum
beinq present e+nd the Commisa~ion r~viewed plans o! the
itema on today'a aqende.
RECE88: 11i30 a.m.
RECONVENE: 1:30 p.m.
pREgEN'I~ Cheirmen: Fry
Commieaionere: Bouae, Buehore, Herbat, King, Le Claire,
MeBurne~-
AggENT Conmiasionsres None
ALSO I'RESENT Ronald Thompeon
Annika Santalahti
Joel Fick
Jack White
Jay Titus
Paul Singer
Oean Sherer
Mary McCloskey
Edith Herris
Plenning Director
Assistant Dlractor for Zoning
Aesiatant Director for Planninq
Aesiatant. City Attorney
Office ~nqineer
Treffic Enqineer
Associate Planner
Aseistar.t Planner
Flanning Commisaion Secretary
APPROVAL OF MINUTES: ~ommisaioner King offesred a motion, seconded by
Commigaioner Bouas and MOTION CARRIED, that the minutes of the meetiny of
Januery 10, 1983, be apgroved ae submitted.
ITEM N0. 1. EIR NEGATIVE DECI,ARATION, WAIVER Ok' CODE REQUIREMENT AND
CUNDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 2380
PURLIC HEARING. CWNER: LEO FREEDMAN, 468 S. Raxbury, Beverly Hills, CA
90212. AGENT: CARL KARCHER ENTER]?RI3ES, P.q. Box 4349, Annheim, CA 92803.
Property deacribed as an irregularly-shaped garcel of ldnd cousistinq of
approximately 0.37 acre located at the aoutheast corner of Freedman Way and
Harbor Boulevard, with approximate frontages of 135 feet on the eouth side of
Fre~dman Way and 100 feet on the eaet eide of Harbor Boulevar8.
Ta permit a semi-enclosed fast-food restaurant with waivere of mini~~um nwnber
end type of parking epaces and minitaum land8caped setback.
Coatinued from the meetinqs of NovembAr 29, and December 13, 1982.
There wda no ons indicating their presence in opposition to subject requeat
and althouqh the atatf report waa not read, it is referred to and made a part
ot the minutes.
83-29 1/24/83
M7NUTE8, ANAI{EIM CITY PLJINNING COMMISSION, JANUARY 24, 1983 83-30
Commieeioner Mceurney declared a conflict of intarest as dnfined by Aneheim
City Plenning Coma-iasion R~solution No. PC76-157 edapting a Contlict of
Intereet Code !or the Planning ~ommiesion end Government Code 3ection 3625, et
saq., in that he le an employeo of thQ petitioner •nd pureuAnt to the
provieions of the above C~des, declared to the Chairmen that he wne
withdrawing from the heorinq in cannection wi~h Conditional Uee Permit No.
2380, end would not take pert in eitT~er t.he diecuseion or the voting thereon
and had n~~ discuaead this metter with nny member of the Plenning Connnission.
Thereupon Coauniaeioner Mceurney left the Council Chember at 1s32 p.m.
Commissioner Bouas declared a conflict ot interest as detined by Anaheim City
Planning Commiesion Reaolution No. PC76-157 adopting a Conflict of intereat
Code for the Planning Commission end ~overnment Cade Section 3625, et seq., on
the basis thet she owne stock in the company and pursuan~ to the provieions of
the above Codes, declered to the Chairman theLahe wae withdr.ewinq from the
heering in connection with Conditional U~o Permit No. 2380, and wuuld not tAke
pert in Aither the diacuaeion or the votinq thereon and had not discusaed this
matter with any metnbez of the Planning Camtniasion. Thereupon Commisaioner
B~u~a left the Council Chamber et 1.:32 p.m.
c:ommissionPr Bushore declared a conflict of interest as defined by Anaheim
Clty Planning Commission Reaolution No. PC76-157 adopting a Conflict of
Intexest Code for the Planning Commission and Goverr~ment Code Gection 3625, et
seq., on the basis that he owns stock in the company and receives a commission
as a real eatate agent and purauant to the provieions of the abovo Codeg,
declared to the Chairman that he was withdrawing from the hearing fn
connection wikh Con~itional U:~e Permit No. 2380, and would n~t take par.t in
either the discuasion or the voting thereon and had not diacueaed th3s matter
with any member of the Planning Co~nisaion. T'hereupon Commisaioner Hushore
left the Council Chamber left at 1:32 p•m.
Horst Schor, representing Carl K~rcher Enterpri.aea, atated they are hoping
this proposed restaurant will be an architec'tural landmark for the City of
Anaheim and it will be a 2-story happy family-type place in keepinq witli the
general theme of the area. Hg explainec! there is a problem with parkinq ~nd
they Feel they are hampered due to the size and ahape of the property and that
any use proposed for. this property would have the sane congtraints. He
explainod they are proposing 17 compact car spaces and 8 reyular size spacea;
however, there are over 200 parking spaces available at the Hyatt Hotel and
that the hotel representatives have agrQed to 1et them use the parkingt
however, they have not been able to get a written rAciprocal parking
agreemenr.. He stated if the pazking at tY-e hotel is examined at any time, it
would indicate there ie adequate parking and they feel to require over 100
spaces for thia 234-seat restaurant would be excessive. He added that since
this is to be a fataily-type restaurant, customera would b~ arriving with more
than twa people per vehicle. He axplained this restaurant would have sit-down
facilitiea and take-out service, eo there will be A quick turn around and
peopLe will not be staying long. He noted there iR also a lot of pedeatrian
traffic in khat area and they have mede a st~idy which indicdtes 63~ of their
cuatomers would be walk-in tr.affic.
Mr. 5chor stated thay did meet with Melodyland repreeentntives and have an
undezctandinq they can provide more parking stalls, if required. He referred
to the City's long range plans to establish a parking suthority aeseasment
distri~t to provide a reqional parking facil.ity and etated they would be~
MINUTEB, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNINO CdMM288I0N, JANU~RY 24, 1983 83-31
willing to meet with the City ~ttorney and entsr into an agreement to
participate in •uch e parking a~~es~ment dietrict. H• •teted it will take
about ona year from tha data ot approval to construct the building, eo there
would ba time to eeteblish a parking authority and in the menntime th~y can
uee the excees p~rking nt the Hyatt Hotel.
TNE PUSLIC HE1-RING WAS CLOSED.
Reaponding to Commiesianer Herbet, Mr. Schor eteted they wi.ll have 15
empl~yees there et eny one ti.me.
Commi.ssioner Herb~t was concezned whet would happnn if t'he Hyatt Hotel. wea
t-ostinq n larqe convention or meetinq. Mr. Schor raplied thQy are confident
thet 638 oP their bueineas would be walk-in cuatomoze and thQy are willing to
Ceke thi~ chance.
Commiasionar Herbst stated if 638 of the pat.rona were walk-in cuetom~ra, there
would still be a ehortaqe uf perking apeicea.
Mr. 3chor stated under the ordinance that is correct, but they feel the
parkfnq requlrements for thia facility ere exceesive. Commi.ssioner Herbst
pointed out the cepacity is Por 224 pereon» and Mr. Schoz atated they do not
think that at any one time they would have the entire placo filled with the
take-out servir,e beirig utilized at the same time. Coamiiealoner Herbet stnted
a qood restaurant that servea qood food at. reasonable prices in that area
would be extremely busy, eapecially on Friday nighta with people waitinq to
get in. Mr. 8chnr replied they believe there is adequate pnrking at Che hotel
and tn the future if the hotel parking need:~ are expanded, they would be abld
to use Melodyland parkinq and participate in the pe~rking authurity.
Commiseioner Herbst atated wlth 224 seats and 63~ of the people walkinq in,
they would ntill need 35 spacea and the hotel and Melodyland parkfny are
located pretty far away and that he could not juatify a hardship for this
variance.
Mr. Sc:~or etated they feel customere would find e plece to park somewhere in
the area and the rnunber prapoaed is all they can reall} provide.
Commisoioner i,a Claire sugqested reducing the number of seats. She atated she
agreed there would be a lot of welk-in traffic and there ie room foz a waiver,
but just felt the requested waiver ia too lar,qe. 3he stated she thouqht
touriets seeing that it is a place where they coula eat without spending a lot
of caoney would be drivinq around in the area looking for a place to park,
croatinq a parkinq and traffic problem. She determined there is no pa-rking
pern-i~ted on Freedman Wa~-.
M.r. Schor pointed out there is exceee parkix~g at the miniature qulf course but
they aannot enter into any arrangement becauae their lease expires in two
years. He atated they would be willing to reduce the seatinq capacity to 200
atid not increase it until additional parking can be provi~ded through another
means, either at the minieture golf caurae or a parking structure.
Chnirn-an Fry stated he tinde himself in a dilemma with thia requeat for a
parking waiver which ie quite a bit out of line and pointed out that about aix
montha aqo a hotel expnnsion was requested with n car rental aqency and a
amall delicateseen and tho Planning Camaia~sivn had required the developer to
MINUTBR~ l1l~ANEIM CITY PL11PiNINfi COMlII88ION~ ~TANUARY 24, 1983 83-32
elia-~na-te t.hst portion b~cause it di.d not mee~t the parkinq requirement end he
vrould lind it very di~licult to qran~ a waiver o! thia site. H• steted ha wn•
suxe Cerl Karcher Snterpri~ee would not go into this inv~ntment unleee they
!'it aasured it r+ould bs a succ~esj but thet he ia very uncomforteble with the
perking eituation, espeaially without e reciprocal perkinq ~groement end did
not believa juet reducinq the occupancy would do eny good.
Commineioner Herbet eeked Trel.lic Enqineer, Peul Sir~qer, if any thought has
been qiven to th~s parkinq district with the petitionei participating in a
parkinq structure of some sort.
Paul Sin3ex responded thet a qredt deal of thought hes been qiven tn that
aituetion, but he haa no poeitive intormation nve~ilable at this time. He
ntnted there ia a task force formed to coneider the ent.ire
Disneylend/Convention Center aree (CR District) end they will be aubmitting n
report.
Commiesioner Herbst stated if a parking structure ia located at ~r nebr the
Conventian Center, it will not do thie businas~+ any qood. He at.ated even
though the Pl.anning Cocamission is not aupposed to eet precedents, he knowa
that developers do look nt tho record anct do review past actiona. He stated
he would need to see a reciprocal pezklriq aqreement bofore he coul.n grant thia
requeet.
Commisaioner La Claire euggeat~s:~ i~Rdorqround parking. Mr. Schur replied that
becauae of the siz~ of property, the area needed to provide the up and down
ramps would make it infeesible. He atated thh~l~a~he~eeWioglehstill find waya
type fecility where parki.ng ia not pzovided, Pe P
ta get there.
Mr. Schor requested a two-week continuancc ir. vrder t~ make an effort to meet
with the Hyatt repzesentatives.
AC'rION: Commisaioner Ki.ng offered a moCion, seconded by Com:aissioner La
Claire and MOTION CARRIED (Commisaioners Boues, Bushore and McBurney absent),
that the matter be continued to the meeting of rebruary 7, 1983, at the
reque~t of the petitloner.
Commiseioners eouas, Bushore an~l McB~arney returned to the Council Chamber at
1:55 p.m•
QTn v~nTSVP: nECI.ARATION AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2407
PUBLIC HEARING. OWNE1i.Se El0{ON CO., U.S.A., P•0. Box 16118, Long Beach, CA
90806. AGENT: MURRAY'S/AD$IJ~IAN ENTERPRI3ES, INC., 740 W. Santa Barbara, Los
Anqeles, CA 90037. Property deacrS.bed as an irregularly-ahaped parcel of land
consistinq of approximetely 0.43 acre located at the southoa•' corner of
aranqewood Avenue and State College Boulevard, 2100 S. State ~'lege Boulevard
(Murray's)•
To retain e travel and tiaket aa1~3 aqency in the I~ Zone.
Continue.3 from the meetinq o! Januery 10, 1983.
T'here vras no one 'ldi^.atl~a their preaence in oppoaition to eubject requeat
and although tr.c~ ~.a ' .,~rt wns not read, it is referred to and made e part
of the ~ainutes
~
MINUTaB, ANIINEIM CITY PLAI~iN2Na Cq~MI86ION, J11NU~RY 24, 1983 83-33
Meryann Towna~nd, reprasentin~ r.he ownar of Muzrey'~, ^tatea the owner ha~
bean hospitalised end atked her to repre~ent hitn. 8he ststed the property
still bstonq• to EXXON but is i.n oocrow end they erA trying te obtain the
entiru property.
THL PU8L2C HSARING W118 CLO$EG.
Cheirmen Fry ste~ocl tho Commiseion •pec.ificelly eeked the owner to be praeant
and it is unlortunate thet he is ill~ however, the Commiseion is sti11 upeet
over the lack o! proqrese becouse he haa had over two yeare to teko cere of
everything. He etat~d he ia personelly inclined to deny thie reque~t.
hIA. Townoend stntdd severe' ~>f the impravements have been eccaaplished, but
thet son~ of the improvementa ehould be mede by EXXON ~inca they still own the
property and it would not rru~ke sense tr invest ~20,000 to ~30,000 in
improvementa whiah would have to be renaved when ~ new buildinq is
conai~ructed. Responding to Commissioner t~ouaa, ehe explained the•r expact to
qet en anewer from SXXON in eix months and would beqin constr~actiori
immediately.
Daan Sherer, Aeeociate Ptanner, read a letter from EXXON received on Jenuary
19, 1963, which indicatee they have not mede the final decieion ee to future
plans for this property.
Cammiaeioner Bushore Ateted tii~ information is that xhis property ie not in
eacrow. Ne ateted he has been aqeinet thi$ une Por the laat two years e~nd
th~uqht it is a poor use for the erer~ and is poor planning.
ACTIONs Commiesioner Bushore otfered a motion, aeconded by Coaunisaioner Kin~
end MOTION CARRIED, that the Anaheim City Planninq Commission has reviewed the
proposal to retdin a travel and Cicket sales eqency in the ML (Induetrial,
Limited) Zone on an irreqult~rly-shaped parcel o~ land coneisting of
approximately 0.43 acre located at the southe~st corner of Oranqewood Avenue
and Stete Colleqe Boulevnrd (2100 3. 5tete Colle~e Boulevard (Murray's))t and
does hereby approve the Neqetive Decleration from the requirement to prepare
an environmental impnct r~sport on tt:e basis ::hat thare would be no siqnificant
individual or ~mulative adveree environmental impact dne to the approval of
ttiia Negative D~claretion eince the Anaheim General Plar. 9esiqnates the
s~xbject property for gen~srel industrial land usea commensurate with t1~e
proposalt that no sensitive envizonmental impacts are involvcd in the
propoaelt that the Tnitial Study submitted by the petitioner ir~dicatea no
eiqnifica~t in./ividual or cwaaulat+.ve a8veras environmental impactss and that
the Negetive Declaration aubstantiatinq the fozeqoing findinqe is on file in
~.he City of Anaheim Planninq Department.
Comtnieaioner Bushore of`nr.ed Reeoluti~n No. PC83-15 ~nd moved for its paseaye
and adoptiun that tt~e AnahQim Gity Planninq Commiesion doee hereby deny
Conditionel U~e Permit No. 2407 on the ba~ie that the petitioner has not
complied Nith the original conditione o! `•he conditional usa permit nllowing
the use ae s temporary uss nnd that thi~ is nat an appropriata use for this
aren.
On roll call, the lozeqoing resolution waa passefl by :he follovrinq votes
AY88 s 80U118, BO~HORE, FRY, BBRBST, t- "' ".: , Ll- CT.l-IRE, 1~lC BUla18Y
NOEB: 'NONE
1~BSEliTs NOlig
MINU'M;B, AN11H3IM CZTY P?.~1NNINa COM.M788IQN, JANU1-R'. Zo, 1983 83-34
Prior to votinq on tha ator~mantion~d r~solut~on, the Cortuni~sion bri~tly
Ciscur~ed tho~• itea~~ wfiich wsrR aondition~ o! th• oriqinsl aonditional ua~
p~rmit aith Com~uui~~ion~r Buahor~ indicatiny he would make tho~• oriqinel
conditions • lindinq o! thi• re~olu~ion !or denial.
RASpondinq to Me. Townsend concarning EXXON'a responaib.ility in caaplyinq with
thaAe improvsasnts, Chsirnbn Fry pointeA out the Planninq Coaimis~ion can not
q~t involv~d in en iesu~ which is between the leesor and leea~e.
Comvai~sion~z H~rbst painted out ths oriqinel c~nditional us~ p~rmit was
grenta~l in Dec~nber o! 1980, with the owner etipuletinq to tak~ care ot ths
improv~msnts within 90 daya, which hns not been done, and that would includA
brinqiny tha preeent building up to code requlrementa.
Jaek White, 1-esietant City l~ttorney, presented the written riqht to nppeal tha
Plnnninq Coma-ission'4 deci~ion within 22 dayq to the City Council.
ITEM NQ. 3. $NVIRONMENTIIL ZMPJICT REPORT N0. 252~ I~IIIVBR OF CODB REQUIRElMBNT,
CaNDITI0NJIL USS pBRMIT NO. 2400, ADQPTION OF piCVBLOPNBNT AGRSLMRNT N0. 83-O1,
ORANt38WO0D BLOC:K M]-BTER PLIItJ~ D3CLAWITION OP COVEN11NT8~_ CO[~IQITIONB, 81-98I+~i~iTB
AND RESTRICTIONS A-ND OTHER RELATED OPBRATING DOCiJMENTB
PUBLIC HEARING• OWNRR: CITY OF 11NJWEIM, P~O~ Bc~x 3222, 1lnaheim, CA 92803.
AGBNTt AN1lHFIM ST7IDIUM A3BOCI1ITES, c/o C, C 6 F STADIUM PROPBRTIEB, 911
Wilshire, BUITE 1010, Loe 1lnqales, CA 90017. Pr4perty deecribed ae an
irreqularly-shaped parcel o! land conalstingof apprnximately 20 acrea, having
n lrontaqe ot approximately 852 leet on the north side nf Oranqewood Avenue,
approximetely 1310 feat east of the centerline ot 8tete College Boulevard and
further described ae the Anaheim Stedium complex.
CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST: To conetruct n coaunorcial r,omplex in the PR Zone
with on-sale alcohalic beveraqes and outdoor dining lncilities and with
waivers of maxiaum nun~er of emall car spaces and rninimun- number o~ pnrk..ing
spaces.
DEVF•LOPMENT 1-GREEI~4:NT NO. 83-01 - To be coneidezed for a recommendation to
City Counail, Oranqewood Hlock Master Plan, Develapment ]~graement 83-O1,
Declaration of Covonants, Conditions, Baeements and Reatrictione, and other
related o~retinq aocua~ente .
Thare aere two persona indicatinq their presence in opposition to subject
requeot snd althouqh the atalt report was not read~ it i8 relerred to and m+ide
a part o! the minutes.
Joel Fick, J-ssistant Director for Plenninq, explained thia proj~ct has been
reviewed by all opezating depertments and etaf f recommende approval of the
actions ae set lorth on Paqe 3-h o~ thR Staff Report~
John Wasaon, Cabot, Cabot and Forbes, repreeenting Anaheim 8tadium 1lgeocintes,
praeantad slides of the pr4poued project, pointinq out thia propoael only
pertaina to the 20-aare Oxangawood Blxk and is the reault o! •everal
diffarent et:udies. He poi.nted out the relocetion of the Stedium entry road,
NINUT~B, AN71lIEIM CITY PI.i1I~iNIN~i COMM288ION, J11NUl1RY 24, 1983 83-35
indioatinq it i~ n~a~~sary to k~~p th~ o!!io• ~nd •tadium tr~flic ~~parat~ snd
not~d th~r~ vrould b~ ~ o~ntlict o! tho~• Lraltic• only lour ttaw~ a y~er and
pointed out ths north/~outh o!!io• aac~~^ road •nd o~fic• di~tribution road
which wi11 di~tribut~ tr~!!ic to th~ lour q~raq~~. H• bri~lly di~au~sed the
pha ~inq plan, notinq the proj~ct~ get 1eLqar v-ith •ach pha~o.
Mazi• Peiks, 8kidnwrs, Arinqr and Merrill, pr~sented ~ev~r~l ~ilide• of the
propo~ed proj~ct, noting they tried to provide individual identitie~,
clu~t~ring !or op~n apaca, wall d~fined bounderi~o, cl~ar organisa~ion, vi~ual
unity, sesy s~seso~bility !or th• proj~ct and tha stadium, and psdestrian
oriantation. H• pointed aut the op~n epace around tha parkiny ~tructures and
buildinga and the raajor north/aouth perk in tha middle.
Mr. Paika briafly reviewed ths li.rst phaoe o! tt.~• clevelopment and the ground
level p1anA !or the firet phase with tha outdoor eatinq and dinlnq lacilities
and explainad the lirnt phnse developtnent will include one-half. o! the entire
park. He pointed out tha terrecAS o! the buildinq and tha exteneive
lanascaping. He prasented en ov~rall viaw of ahat the project miqht be after
alteznate developmenC of all tour phasea.
Mr. Waeson atated there are 1.5,553 parking atalls n~w at the atadium - 7,263
on City property and 8,0~0 on 1~SA proparty of which 2268 etells nre on the
Orangewood Blxk, includinq the Stadium entry roadt and thst Phase I will
diaplnce 1,284 atalle and add 1,200 in the Phase I qareqe !or e total
availnble a! 15,469 and that the Ground I.sasa requires that 15,000 he providad
tor certain eventa at the 8tadium, ao there would be e surplue of 469 epacag
and there would be nn excen• ot 3,70U spacea after ultl.mate developmant.
Rick Snuve, DKS .~sociates, stated the exieting Stedium has one o! the best
trn!!ic accees patterna in thp United States !or qettinq in and out o! the
Stndium and they heva tried to maintain that xhile superi.mposing the o!lice
complex. He pointed out the d~tailed on-eite circulaticn plan and etnted they
did eurveya durinc~ the baseball gamee, ~ootball q~nes, etc. and found that the
exietinq Stadium road on Orangewood sometimes quell-''{~p and blxka the through
tra!lic, so they have deeiqned n 9Q0-foot entry road end the exiatinq road ie
only 550 feet with eiqht gataa and they are proposinq thirteen qatae. He
preaented a slide showinq the four south-bc~und lanee !or 8tndium exitinq only
and nated thnt the existing axit hac only thrce lanest and that there will be
two traffic eiqnale with the north eiqnal providinq pedeatriax~ croasing end
the otfice accees road has five tra!!ic lanea. He stated every poaeible event
scenario has been thouqht of and they think the roadway system will work very
well. Ha pointed out all traffic entering will have to qa through ~he toll
booths, eo tha parkinq will be cantrolled and durinq eventa office uoere will
use intarior circulation roadwaya and not contlict with the Stadium usera. He
stnted the traffi.c impact report looked at 29 adjncent intereections, as tar
away as 1-1/2 milea, and the offica buildinq wouln impact eiqht o! thoee
intersectiona and tvro would be impacted in the future without any office
buildinqa and that they have propoued a comprehensive mitiqation proqram for
those eiqht locatione~ and thnt Oranqewood Avenue would be w~dened to six
lane., providinq an extxa lax-e over the 8anta ~a River bridqe. He ~tated
conflicts of a baeaball game e~nd office trr~tfic toqether woul~l only happen
Mhen thare is a weekday a~ternoon haseball game ar a weak-niqht lootball qame
and that vrould be betwaen 0 to 4 times a year and duxinq nwst StaBium events
there aould bs no conflict with otfice uses.
MItiUTt~, 11N11!lSIN CITY PLANNING CGMIMI88ION, J11NU7-RY 24, 1983 83-J6
I4r~ N~tson •tat~d durinq th~ ~tudy r~saion ln~t we~k, th• Planninq Connni~sion
indic~t~d aonc~rn abouti elevator s in th• parkinq qar~y~s •nd that their
company has r~studi~d that •ituation dnd it vrould appoar edditional •levators
r-ould b~ r~quired in the lir~t ph~~• parkinq qarag~.
Mlr. wa~~on th~nk~d the City ~ta~! and the Planning Coauni~~ion and stalt
e~p~cially, iadioati~q th~y havs baen as oupportivn so any •t~!! he hae .ver
b~~n involved Nith.
Azthur Petter~on, 7lssistant to the Chainaan o! the BoarA, Calitornia 11nqa1~,
~tated the thing that disturbs the 1-nqels tih• npst is that no cl~ar delinition
of the inqre~a and eqress hao be~n mwde and a~ked why the exit rosd, dizectly
lrom the 8tadium to Orangewood, cannot be u~ad for inqress ao well and
~uqqaeteQ it is becauae thet wau ld contlict with otfice hour~. He etated the
Angsls hope ta draw thraa mi111on people this year, but he would havo cloubta
on that drewi.nq power i! it beccaiea ditficult to ~et in and out of the
8tadium. He stated Anaheim's pr oudast boast ie that they hava built n atadium
under plans end specilicetions set down .in the beginni~~q and that people
eommend the Stadium, as it now s tends, and the parking lacilitia~ as they are
now. He etnted he wns concerned ebout where the people will go etter they
have antered the lonq entry road bdcausa they will be in the ~urthest poeaible
part o! the S~adium. He eteted probably the wc~xat part o! thia ie that the
Commisaion is only conaiderinq one segment o! Che property e-nd after the
ultimate development with hiqh-r ise office bu.ildinqs ell alonq State Colleqe
Boulevard and in thet very impor tnnt Orangewood lot bigger problems will be
created !or the far,s.
Mr. Pattereon stated they have only seen these plana here and it wae sugqeated
at the work sesaion that it wou 1 d be n good idea to a-aet with ~he Anqels to
ahow them more detail lnet week, but that hne not occurredr however, there ie
a meeting scheduled for Thursday o! this week. He etete d hi• only intereet is
in the fans, but they nre also intereeted in the City and that he, Mr. Bavasi
and Mr. Autry have done conaider able to help the City get moneyt that they
used to pay tha ~160,000 minisae 1 rental fee, but now pay well over ~1,000,000
to the City and that tha City collectad ~1,000,000 lrom concesei~ne ia 1981
and will obtain that much or nsore fran 1982. He atnted the Anqela expect to
have 3,000,000 lan8 thia year arad the Rams v-ill have about 750,000 tans~ and
that this is one of the great~st atadiwas in the United Statea and will
attract more eports people in the futurA, but erecting buildinqa and
conatraininq the parkinq even more, will be detrimental. He stnted the
Stadium wac built for the Mqals and they welcomed the Rame to ]~r-aheim and
ther~ will be other sportinq cu stomere for the Stadiwn in the futura, but new
cuatotnare wi.l]. loak a~, what ia happeninq now and at the fact that tha parking
will be cut into smallar pieces. He etated they will be aatistied with the
12,0~0 parkinq apaces, but not includinq the perking atructure, because with
crowda o! 50,000 or 60,000 people who have atayed until the last man is out,
to try and diapsrae auid qet out of s parkinq atructure will have a diificult
time end he lelt they will lose fane and lose the whole core of what hae~ been
s very succass~ul entarprise ovar the past live or six years.
Mr. Patterson tha:ilced the Planning Commaisaion !or allowinq him to speak and
staCed he hoped the Coma~iseion will take a hard long look at the future over
and above this 20 acres whare fs~ns vrill be ehunted nround throuqh the new toll
gatee. He noted tana parkinq under the big "]-" will have a lonq walk. 8a
~. +
MIt~lUTSB, l1N~NSIM CITY PLIINNINC COMM28920N, Jl1MJI1RY 14, 1983 83~37
•tat~d th~y will b~ takinq away mor~ purkinq spac~~ th~n indio~t~d. H~ not~a
tih• perkinq r~quir~nt wa~ ~~t at 1Z,000 sp~c~• bscaus• at th~ timR it Ma•
not knovm that th• olub would b~ a• ~uco~~slul a• it i~, but right na+ th~y
~ra v~ry oucc~solul and the Ram• ar• •ucc~~slul and thi~ will mak• ie rouqh to
q~t into and out o! tha Stadium.
Lloyd Lechter-b~rq, Property M~naqer, 1Cquit~c Prop~rti~s, •tat~d they own lour
larq~ induetrial parks, two on th~ carn~r o! 8tate Colleg~ snd 1Cat~lla and one
on Oranqawood in Oranqa, juat acro~~ the lreaway and the larqe 1lnahaim Stadium
Collaga Park diractly aczoes the street lr~n~ the 8t~diua- on Peoilicia and
State Gollsge. He statsd thsy are vary conc~rned ubout tha parkinq and on
day~ when qames wsre going on durinq busine~s hours, i-a haa ~pent the entire
w~ekend trying ta patrol hie property nnd ssked who is going to pay tor tha
maintenance and demeqs thet teksa place on all their proparties. He stated he
has a raeponsibility to hie tenants end hes had to chein hie ereaa durinq
bal.lqames. He etsted a tr~mendoue amount oi dameqe i~ dane and it i. a real
problera anQ he ha• hdd to brinq eecurity per~onnel from other areas to
tasintain control over tha cr.owd and protect their property end he thduqht
eliminating any portion o! the parkinq would create~ a terzible burden, not
only on adjacant proparties, but up t~ two or three miles awsy.
Responding to Chairman Fry, I~lr. Lechtenberg eteted the induetrial park on
Pacificio wae built in 1978, end it joine Goldenwest Husineae Park which they
have s~ld, but cont.inue to meneqe.
Mr. Waseon etnted they ara very concernad ebout the operntion ot the Stadium
and have spant about one nnd three quarter million dollsre in the laet two
yeare studyinq that operation so they could lully underatsnd i.t and a
Circulation Mnnegement Plan has baen submitted which .hows what the pereon
workinq on the parking lot will do in a21 eituations. He sta+:ed people are
aent to fill up di!lerent portions of the lot durinq ~vente. Ha etatcd they
met on Septemb~r 21, 1982, with Mr. 8avaai and went thr~ua~~ a aia~ilar
presentation and were not contronted with oppc~sition at thst point, but felt
now that the lingels have had time to think about the situatian, another
saesion is needed to talk about how the plan works. He atated he feele
contident that the Anqels' concerns hnve been addressed. Hs stnted the
Stadiwo etalf hes been ~he watehdoq over the eituation and that they are vary
aware of the Anqela', Rune' and city'e concerne and want everythinq in the
aree to work well.
Mr. Wasaon r~eterrad to adjacent property or+nere' problems with eecurity durinq
events and etated he did not think thoe• comments were really directed at thie
development, but to the aventa. He added they hnve similar concerns about
what would hnppen when there is A rock concert qoinq on with certain typee of
people waitinq !or the event end they will be in the aecurity buainese
themselvas for certain situatione nr~d realizt that people who have property
eround a major aporta tnciliLy mu~c recoqnize they will have those problems.
THB PUBLIC HBJIRING W7-8 CLOSBA.
Commiasionar Hu~hore camplimented statf aad the developer on all the work that
has gone into this project. !ie stated hie only queation, aPtar r~viewinq all
tha dacumenta submitted, pertain to the denaity o! parkinq. He atated he felt
a davelopmant this near tha 8tadium, vith psopla workinq in otiices who would
be ~nvi.tinq their lriende to qo with them to the Stadium evants, would leave
MI~IU'1'E8, 71N~11iZ~M CZT!f PIJ1tit~llNG COMMI88ION, J11N1J11RY Z4, 1983 83-38
their vehiol~• in th~ struotur~~ ~nd arti~ad tiho q~aa~t and thet att~nd~no•
probably would qo up b~oau~• o! tihi~ d~v~lo~Qaisnt. H• atated h• r~~lia~•
property own~rs on th~ p~ri.phsz,IR~. o! th• 8t~diwa do enoountsr ~~ouri~y
probl~m~ when th~r~ i• a larq~ ovent b~caut~ a lot o! p~opl• do try to lind a
tree spao• to park end ha know~ th~r• ha~`b~~n a lat o! canplaint• wh~n ther•
has b~~n ~ rock ooncarL at th~ 8tadiwa. H• ~tat~d h• hop~d bhe parking
~tructur• would not cauee p~opla to not. att~nd th• qama~. H• stat~d thi~ pisn
laok• very qood ta him, but ha i• wond~rinq i! th~ actual numb~r of ~pac~s i^
ad~quete sinca the proj~ct will be 1,007 apac~s •hort and not~d that a p~rkinq
structuz~ ~psc• cost• about 1~6,500 Nhiah would ba an edditionel 6.5 million
dol~ar~ for thi~ projaat and vrondarad it thez• st-ould be a~ aondition inolud~d
that i! the parking n~~ds are qreat •nough, ther• should be soaa built-in
msaaure to acc~cam~odate additionnl parkinq.
Commi~sioner Herbst a~ked the maximum number o! vehicl~a at an ]-nq~l gama,
wond~rinq how otten the lot is actually lillad. Paul Sinqer repli~d that
thera are 16,500 spacaa available at the ~tadium and they have been lilled
occasionnlly !or Anqel gamea.
Comn-iasioner Herbat otated he is concerned because 670 spacea will be
eliminated during Phase Z constxuctian aad that the two roadwaya will uae n~ore
area than will be gained, in addition to the epacas loet because of the
buildinq and asked if they will be buildinq the garage at the same tima they
build the buildinq for Pheee I.
Mr. Wsaeon replied that he is not preparad to a-ake a total canmitment on that
iaeue, pointinq out aqnin, legally they are required to prov.ide 15,000 speces
!or the Rams and 12,000 for the Anqels.
Commi.ssioner Hsrbst indicatQd concern ior the Anqe~a when they axceed the
12,OQ0 speces. Mr. Wasaan rapliad when Oranqewood ie built out, the overall
parking supply will be 3,700 more spacea than presently sxiats.
Commi.ssioner Herbat potnted out the entire pr.o3act could qo on until the yeer
2000 and whan canatruction ia atarted, parkinq will be elimiaa~ed.
Mr. Wasson etated with the leqal requirement !or speces, thay cannot do the
construction durinq the Rams saason without their parmisaion beaauee that
would be encroachinq into thair number.
Comminaioner Herbat stated the Rame play 8 to 10 home qames at the Stadium and
the 1-nqels play approxinately 80 hoiae qanie• and he lelt the parking qarage
should be conetructed first. He added he felt the per~kinq is handled very
vrell by lilling certain partiona o! the lot firet, but he wae still concerned
about the lonq renqe eftect the davelopment v+ould have on the ~nqlea over the
naxt 10 yeare.
Concerninq the elevators, Ca~misaioner Herbst atated he did not think juet
ad~ttng anothar elevator will solve the probiem and that escalators or ramps
will be needed.
Regarding the v-idaning o! Oranqawood, Caaaaieaioner H~rbat stated he noted that
would aot be accomplished until the third phase and thet would msan tearinq up
the corners twice and ha thought that woald be paor planninq and that nll
impxovaments ahould be done at tha same tiare.
Klp~g~ 11l11~t~Iy CITY pW1NNIN0 COMMII88ION, J11NL1ARY Z4, 1983 83-39
Cornni~~ian~r Kinq ask~d about cov~ring Ghe pas~aqew~y lran th• o!lic~ Duildinq
to the p~rkinq ~tructur~s !or p~dastirians. t~lr. Mla~~on r~pli~d th~ir l~~linq
ha~ nAt ahsng~d on that i~~ue b~cau~• th~ bad vnather in oouthsrn Calilornia
is not a major prot ~m. H• ~xplain~d they will h~va an opportunity to r~ctity
th~ situation, howavar, i~ it is a problem with th~s lir~t buildinq and they
could add that l~aturs in luturs buildinqs.
R,~~ponQinq to Commissiunsr Herbat, Mr. Wa~~on expleined they will have to hav~
a Mastnr Plan !ox ths Stats Colleqe site to th• City by 1993. Commia~lonsr
Herbet indicat~d concarn sbout rtia sita of ths 8teta Collega project with Mr.
Was~on r~sponding skudies indicnte the 8teta Co11Aq~ ~ite would bs a taaximum
o! 2 to 3 million equare l~at.
Con~niosioner Harbst asked whet the impact would be an the whole stre~t pe~ttszn
around the 8tadium alter ultimnte developu-ent. Paal Singer, Trattic Enqinaer,
responded that tha petitioner !or the aonditional ::ae permit on the northweet
corner o! Orangewood snd Stata Collaqe wae aakad to pey tor a atudy ot the
sraa ~~~ determine the ultimate saturetion poasibilities of hiqh-oflice+
complex n on the nntire area and thnt etudy, whan corapleted, will enawer all
the questions.
Commissioner Herbet atatad the development o! thia 45 acres will generata
another 16,000 people and houeinq neec~s will be increaeed. Mr. waeson agreed
abaorption ie e criticel question.
Responding to Coamnisaioner Harbat conc.erninq the aewaqe eitustion, Joel Fick
explained two lattezs were received froea the Ornnqe County Snnitation Diatrict
which basicelly indicated the diatrict feels currently they can hendle the
aewage qeneratad trom this projectt however, other in-till projecte throuqhout
Oranga County, could result in posaiLle overloading. He etated the Oranqe
County Sanitation Dietrict's atef! did indicat~ a etudy is bainq conducted of
the entire regional ayatea- and the reaults ehould t~e avail~-ble in
nppzoximetely 6 monthef howevnr, bated on current intormation, ~!-ey leel it
coulcl be handled today.
Commi~sioner Bouas aqreed thAt the parkinq atructure ehould be bui1L lirst
because it would be unfair to tti~ conanunity not to have adequate parkinq at
the Stadium and eliminatinq parkinq spaces would put wore people out into the
induetrial areee and aurroundinq areaa. 3he statnd she ie also concerned
nbout the developera not meetinq with the Anqele' representatives and felt the
Anqele' concerne ahould certainly be satisfied. She atated ahe felt, however~
that after the Angels review the plans, they will realize iti will b~ bette~ in
the long run.
Chairman Fry etated he believea the propoeed entry of! Or.angewood would be an
improvement ovar vrhat is existinq nnd ha did not balieva the aaere addition ot
a psrkinq atructure would eolve the parking problema and he could not believe
that a parkinq structurc o! thie mngnitude would be proposed with only one
elevator. He sugqeuted the elevatora be eliminated and rampa conatructe(t eo
that people wl.11 not b~ vraiting for elavators. He aqreed the parkinq
atructure should be constructed at tha same time the tirst office canplax is
construatad.
Mr. Waeson atated the parkinq struc~ures were oriqinally proposed to bave
betMean 2 or 3 elevators dependinq upoe their height, and they ara propoeinq 3
or 4 elavatore insteatl.
[rIxNUTgB, 11Ii11HEZM CITY pLANNINa COIRtlI88I0N, J1INUARY Z4, 1983 83-40
Jo~l !'iok st+~t~c1 •t.. h~• qiv~n consid~r~bl• thouqht to the short-t~rm and
lonq-t~rm p+~rking n~sd• and point~d out condition no. 42 on paq~ 3-n o! the
~ta!! r~pork has b~en propos~d to reotity the parking probl~ms that could
po~iibly b~ or~at~d by th• Oranq~vrood d~velopment.
7lnnika 8~ntalnhtii, 11ssi~tant Oireotor !or Zoni~g, a~ked that th~ ota!! report
bs oorr~ct~d on pag~ 3-~ under the chart included in paragraph 13 to raad
"~RBach o! the lour o!!ia• parkinq gnrnqes eaay contain up te 10,864 square
l~wt" in~~~aa af 10,000 squar• ~eet es indicatedt and on paq~ 2 0! the
attaahment 7- (mamc iraa Jim 1-rm~trnnq to th~ City Manager/8lanning Commi.esi.on)
•eaond paragraph, lina 8, chanqing the numbur "2,118,480 ~quar~ feet to
2,161,396 equare laet".
Commieeloner Ls Claira aeked tar clarification rsqnrding tha elimination o!
parking epncea snd relerrad to tha numbar~ as ahown in tha eta!! report on
paqe 3-~. Paul Singer, Traffic Enqinesr, pointed out thut stter the
conetruction o! Phsee 4, thare will be s substantiel inaraaee in the nun-ber ot
perking •pacas over snd above what ie •xietinq at the pressnt tin-e.
Commimsioner La Claire asked how meny times ell the parking epaaee aould be
o~cupiad and stat~ad aho ie trying to necertain whether or not it will be
n~cessary to build the parking etructure with Phnse 1.
Mr. Wassan stated currently th~re is n~aximu~a at lour times a year when th~+
parkinq lot would be lilled to its capacity and there would not be a contlict
between the Stedium trat~tc and the offica tratfic. He etsted i! the 1-nqals
w~ra in the pleyotfe or series, then there •:.~~uld not be enouqh parkinq
anyway. He stated with the 8 to 10 Rama hoa-e-qaeaee and basebail playofta or
eeries qaaiee, there could be about 14 times a yeaz when the parkinq lot would
be lilled ~o capacity.
Commiasioner Herbst stated durinq conatruction there would be e bigger losa of
parkinq apa~ces and pointed out Annheim is probably qetting to be the eports
capital of the world and he thouqht the parking aituetion ie vary important,
and he telt to start takinq parkinq away lrom the Stadium now would mean that
everyone would autfer. He atated he realizea the City is coanaitted on this
project but that ail these parking situations muat be taken into
consideration. He etated he would still like to have the garaga atructure
built lirst, ao that the parkinq spaces would be replaced im~ediately because
there ia qoinq to be a qreat deal o! parkiaq loet durinq consCruction and he
felt this would halp the Angele and solve part o! thair problema. He stated
the 3tadium is succesaful becausn it ie centrally locatec! and draws tans from
Snn Bernadino, Pomcna, San Dieqo, etc.
Mr. Wagson pointec~ out there is information on Paqea 11 through 13 0! the 8IR
pertaininq to the d~msnd for parkinq r+ith data providad perta~ninq to the
Angals baeeball qameo•
Chairman Fry clarified with Mr. Singer that parkinq spacee exietinq at the
present time at the Stadium are all etandard siae parkinq spaces. Ha stated
ha thouqht the City ahould take amall car spacas into considara~tion and pezmit
a certain percentaqe ta be !or ccmpact cara, pointinn out it is poasible that
more spaces could be picked up by re-stripinq the parking lot.
!!r. Singer pointed out there is a problem im m~rkinq parkinq apace8 and mixinq
sma~ll car spacaa with larga cax apacea and it has to be done vary carefullyt
~
P~~41
MItQUT38~ 11N1111~IN CITY PLAt1NING CGMMI882GN, J11NI171RY Z4, 1983
however, it i• e po~sibility, but it would r~quirm r~Pavinq o! th~ loL. H~H.
sta~~d 10• ~uldOr• pir~•~-no~xecu~tiv~adsai~ion bytthe Dir otorYa~xtheiStadium.
add~d tihi• ~N
R,~sponQing to Ch~irmaa ~'rY reqsrdinq ~i:• o! ~pacs~ in th~ pr'opcs~Q Puskinq
•tructur~~, Mr• Nas~on repli~d the City'~ Code woald p~rmit 3S• compsat ~pscao
ar-d tihey ar~ rsqu~~tinq 50• end tha~ti~in aout~ hat9car caapani~~ehaveaaes to
dsal with th• cars o! th• luture, pQ 9
mandate trom th• Environm~ntal Protection 1-qenoy to nNOt aertain a~ileaqe
r~quirsmen~h ~ehicleaawill9not~ba5whatew Par~g~a~inq~today,~ans that th•
desiqn o!
42 and
Conwissionar Buahore asksd for clarilication regarding Condition No.
the stat~a»nt which etat~kin~aedacesacurrently requl.redXby Codeaandtthesnumber
batween the rumber o! P+~ p
for the parking wsivers are qranted."
Joel Fick clarilied thet the developer ie requesting s wai.ver from the current
Code req~affmcansrequireiadditionalnspaces orlredaei~gnvupito t e pr~sent Code.
luture e
Commieaionar Harbst pointed out this o!lice complex would have accees to the
15,000 atnlls on the Stadiua- parking lot which is eomethinq no other hiqh-rise
otfice coaaplex has. Ha et.ated he ie concerned about those tew timea there
would be e fillad parking lot for an 1-ngel qame becauae i~c~geaienused outside
treated right, they will come beck. He asked how many spa
the Stadium durinq big evente, with Mr. Waeeon responding it is estimated that
6,000 apaces on the outside are utilized. He pointed ou~ these will be
well~desiqned parkinq structurea and he did not think requiring fana to uee
theee parkinq structures ehould be coneidered ae mietreetn-ent to the fans.
Commiasioner Buehoxe etated he wants to make aure the City has the tool to
correct the situation if there is m prablem in the future so that the taxpeyer
will get the niaximum benefit. He etated in the future thexe may be a
baaketiball complex located ther~ and there could ba tMO eveate qoinq on st one
time.
Mr. Wasson stated when the State Colleq~~s~he eituationuiaianddc uld rectity
Co~n-iesion will ba dble to see exactly
any mietakes at that time.
Cocamisaioner La Claire atated the Traffic Enqineer has indicated that ~-s the
phasea are developed, par.kinc~ will be increased rather Chan decreased and if
properly deaigned, there will probably be nwre people parking in the
etructuzes and lesa pazking in the eurroundinq area. She stated ahe realizea
the people in the eurroundinq industrial area may heve a t~roblem occasionally,
but theYen the~ ur hasedd heirnpropertiesnand~thatapropertYwvalu sthav~ was
there at y P
really increased becauae of the Stadiun-•
t~lr. Wneson expleined the surrounding property owners in tha area will be the
largeat recipients of the value addad by tha imp~'ovem~ente t.hat will be put
into the area as a result of this davelopment.
Commissionsr tlcBurnay gtated that parkinq structures have been deaiqaed to
increase the nuinber dg Parkinq epaces and also tha City has the tool of
restripinq the existinq Stndium garkinq lot to increase the number of etalls
i! requixed, so he lelt the parkiag problems can be resolved.
:~
i
~
i
,
MINUTEB, 71N11HEIM CITY PLJINNINfi COMMI88IOt1 ~ J11t~NARY 24, 1983
83-42
ACTi0N8: Coauaissianer Herb~t o!l~r~d R~solution No. PC83-16 and mov~d !or it~
pa aa~~qa and aQopiion that ~h• 1-neh~im City planninq Coamai~sion do~s h~reby
oertily Environm~ntal Iu~pact R~port No. Z5Z and adopt a Statomenti o!
Ov~rrid~nq Conaid~rations, inaludinq r~spon~~• to oomiasnt• r~a~ivad.
On roll call, th• lor~goinq ro~olutiion wa• passad by the lollowing vote~
11YB$t BOUAB, BU8HOR8, FRY, HER88T, 1CIN0, LA CLAIRE, MC 8URN8Y
NOl~B: NON$
]~888NT: KONE
Commission~r Harbat o!lared a motion, aeconded by Commisaioner McHurnay end
MOTION C1IRRIBD, that tha Anaheim City Planning Commis~ion doe~ hereby grant
waivers o! coda requiramdnt on tha baais that ultimete development on the
entir• eita will provide an increased number o! parkinq epacas and elso on the
basis that the parkinq etructure Por Phase 1 0! the devalopa-snt will be
con~tructed prior to or conjunctively Mith the Phase 1 o!lice comglax.
Commissioner HerbRt oltarad Resolutian No. PC83-17 nnd moved !or its pesenqe
and ndoption that the Anaheim City Planninq Comtalesion doee hareby qrant
Condi,tional Use Permit No. 2400 subject ta the condition thet the parking
atructure !or Phase 1 shall be conatructed prior to or conjunctively with the
office cotnplex and that the widening o! Oranqewood Avenue between the ingreae
and egrees road~ shall be coa-ploted at the ~nu~a time as the other improva~aante
on said street durinq Phase 1 rather than duxinq Phase 3, as proposedi and
that the parking structure shall include ram~a or ascalators and subject to
2nterdapartmental Committee recommendatione includinq e revieion to Condition
No. 43.
On roll call, the loreqoinq re8olution was pasaed by the tollowinq votes
AYEBs HOUAB, BU$HORB, FRYr t1ER88T~ KYNG, LA CLAIRE, MC HURNBY
NOE$t NONE
ABSENTs NONE
Coaamiecsioner Herbat etated he would like for the Planning C~iseion to have
ari opportunity to reviaw the tinal preciee plans.
Cousaieeioner La Claire askad if it would be acceptable if the developer could
lind other parkinq available rather than construct the pnrkinq atructure.
Commissioner Herbst etated he felt the structure ehould be built with the
liret buildinq becauee this may be the only buildiaq ever conatructad.
Commiseloner Nerbst otfared a n-otion, saconded by Gommiasioner McBurnay and
MOTION C1-RRIRD, that Condition No• 43 be amended ae followe: "That the final
pracise plans shall be eubmitted to the Planninq Depart,ment for review and
dppzoval by the Ttlanning Commission," and that this should be included in the
gravious ::esolution.
Commisaioner Hexbat offerad a motion, eeconded by Comvaieaioner Bouns and
l~ip~Ipp ~7-RRIEp, that the Annheim City Planninq Commi~sion does hereby
recommend ta the City Council that the Orangewood Blxk Master Plan entitled
"Correctionn and l~dditions to Uze~nga~+ood Bloak Maeter plan" be app~ovad and
that aaid Mastar Plan ahall include the requirement that the parking atructure
tor ths P~ase i coa~lex ~hall be constzucted pacior ta or conjunctively vrith
the Phaae i huilding.
~ ~ ~ ~ !
~ ~'-,,"1 ~ ,. ... ~. _ ,1 ~~ . ' '~ ' ie'~w~
MIt~1I1Tl~8~ ANIWRIM CITY PLANNING CONMI88ION~ JAN011AY Z4~ 1983 83-43
Commi~sio~~r H~rbat oli~c~d a mokion, ~econd~d by Coaimiasion~r eousa end
MOTION Cl-RRIgD, th+~t the 1lnehsim City Pl~nning Coaa~i~~ion doea h~«by
recomm~~d to th• City Councii the~ D~v~lop~aeet Agr~~ment No. b3-O1 be approv~d
on th~ basi• thet kh• propoa~d agr~~m~nt ia conai~tent with tihe ci~n~rel Pisn
o! ths Ci~y of Anaheim end eny epplic~bl• apacilic pient and ia competibi•
with th~ usea authori~ed in end tih• regulations pr~accib~d !oc th~ applicable
soning diotrict, and ia compatible with the ordecly d~velopment o! prop~rty in
th• auccounding ~r~ast and is not otharwise detcimental to the health, ialety
and g~nscai w~ltare of the citiaena o! l-naheim end ~loo, inciuding
c~quicsments pectaining to the timing of the conatcuction ot the parking
etcucture end elao c~vtew o! linel pldna by th~ Planning Commission.
Commissioner Herbat ottered e motion, seconded by Commie~ioner pouas and
MOTION CJ-RRIED, thae the 1-naheim City Planning Commiseion doea hereby
recommend to the City Cauncil that the Declaretion of Covenants, Conditiona,
eseements and Reetrictiona ceieting to the proposed developmertt be approvad.
Commiaeioner Herbet offered e moCion, aeconded by Commisaioner Bouae and
MOTION C1-RRIBD, that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby request
thst the City Council ceview the nctione of the Planning Cotamission on
Conditional Uae Permit No. 2400 end EIR No. 252 purauant to Section 18.03.080
of the Anaheim Municipel Code and in conjunction with Council's action on the
Orengewood Block Master ~l~n, Developme~t 1-greement No. 83-O1, Decleretion of
Covenenta, Conditions, Eaeements and Reetrictions and Any othec relaCed
operating documents being conaidered.
Jack White, AAaietant City ~-ttotney, expl.ained nocmally there aould be e
22-day appeal period for the conditional uae permit end environmental impact
reports howev~r, eince the Commisaion has cequea~ted that the City Council
ceview their actiona, the matte~ will be aet for public heering before the
City Council and new noticea will be sent in the s4me mannec as for todey's
hearing.
RLCESS: There wes a fiftee~ minute recesa at 3:~5 p.m.
RECONVBNE: The meetinq was reconvened et 4:00 p.m.
ITEM N0. 4. BIR NEGIITIVE DBCW\RJ-TION AND RECL113SIPICATION NO. 82-83-19
PUBLIC HEARING. REQUESTED BY '1TiE CITY OP ANIWEIM, 1~i,ANNING COMMISSIQN~ P.O.
Box 3222, 1-na~hexm, C]- 92803. The subject properties coneist of eight
mobilehome parka on e combined totel of approximately 136 acres as follows:
Portion 1~: Del Prado is a rectangulerly-shaped parcel of land containing
approximately 13.6 acres located on the east eide of Euclid Street,
approximately 646 feet south of the cente[line of Cercitos 1~venue, h+~ving a
frontaqe of approximetely 468 feet on Euclid Street.
Portion B: &atellite llobilehorae Park, is an irregulerly-ehdped parcel
containing approximately 16 acrea, having a frontaqe of approximately 1100
feet on the east side of 8aster Street, the northerly boundary of subject
property being lacated approximetely 195 feet south of the centerline of
lcatella 1-venue rrith a maximum depth o! approximately 600 feet.
Portion C: Planta~ion Mobile 8etatea, is an irregularly-sheped p.srcel
containinq approxia-ately 10.7 ~cres located on the southwest side af
ltanchestec 1-venue approximately 720 feet eouthaast of the centerline~ of
Ratella Way with a frontege of approximately 60 feet on Manchester.
~'
MINUT38~ 1-NIWEIM CITY pL11NNIti4 Ct)NMI88ION~ J~NUARY 24~ 1983 83-44
Portion D: D~l R~sy Mobile Estat~~, ia an irreqularly-shapad parcal o!
lan- Q containing approxiau~t~ly 10 aar~~, loaatsd on t.he ~outhwo~t siQ• ot
Msnoh~star Aveau~ approxim~tely 1600 l~~t narthwn ~t o! ths aent~rlin• of
Oranq~vrood 7-vsnue havinq a lrontaq~ o! appraximati~ly 130 laet on th•
~outhr+e~t ~id~ of Menche~tsr 1-v~nue.
Port~ion Ee Pond~rota Mobila E~tatea~, io en irregularly-shaped parcel
con~ tai q approximat~ly Z4.35 acr~s, having s lrontaqa o! approximately
525 ls~t on the ~outhv-est sids o! Manchester !~v~nus snd •xt~nding
wesb~rly to Lewis titraet, and a lrontaqe o! approximetsly 841 foet on
Lewis 8trast, th• eouth~rly boundaxy o! subject prop~rty beinq located
approximatsly 4d5 laet north o! the centerline ot Chapman 1lvenue as
measur~d alonq the anst riqht-ol-vray lina o! Lewis Street.
Portion F: Orange arove Mobile Villeqe, ie an irregularly-shdpee parael
con- tairiinq approximately 4.8 acree locatad on tha waet aide o! E:arbor
Boulevnrd ~spprox3mately 625 leeC north o~ the centerline of Ball Road,
having a lrontaqe of epproximately 210 leet on the r+aet eide of Harbor
Soulevard.
Portion G: Sunkist Gardene, ie an irreqularly-shaped parc~l of land
con~ taining approxi~nately 32 acras loceted northeasterly of the
inte:eaction of Cerritoa Avenue nnd 3unkiet Btreat, havinq a frontaqa ot
approximntely 983 leet on kha east uide o! Sunkist 8treet and hevinq a
meximum depth ot approximetely 1335.
I+ortion H: Orange Tree Mobile Park, ie an irrequlerly-shapad percel
con~ taininq approximately 25 acres lccated on the eaet aide o! Douqlaes
Road approxin~ately 1080 feet north of the centerline of Katella ~-venue
with a frontege of approximately 1135 feet on the east side o~ Douqlaeg
Road.
To place the Mok+ilehome Park Overlay Zone on the eight above+mentioned
mobilehome parks.
There were approximately seventeen interestad peraons indicatinq their
presence to aub~sct requast and although the staff report wae not read, it is
referred to and made a part ot the minutea.
Dean Sher~er, Araietent Plannar, explained the addrees ehould ba corrected for
Del Ray Mobile Estatea to 1949 Mnncheeter Avenue, rather than 1849 as
indicated on the statf report.
Commiseioner Buehore 8eclared a conllict of interest perta~ninq to PalEel No.
6, Orange Grove Villaga located at 1009 Harbor Houlevard, ae detined by
Anaheim City Planninq Cowoaisaion ReBOlution No. PC76-157 adoptinq a Conflict
ot InteYast Code !or the Planninq Coenmisaion and Govarnment Code Section 3625,
et seq.~ on the basia that he is the real e~atate aqent for the property owner
and purauant to the provisions of the abovs Codes, declared to the Chairman
that he waa withdrawing from tha hearinq in connection with Tentative Map of
Tract No. 11780, and w~ould aot take part in either the discusaion or the
votinq theraon and had not diecuemed thie matter Mith any member ot the
Plaaning Commisaion. Thareupon Commissionar Suahore 1Rft the Cauncil Chamber.
Glenn Thompson, 1307 8. Euclid Street, llnahaim, asked that n decision
pertaininq to the Oranqe arove l~obila Villaqa be pootponed !or two waake so ha
MINUTEB, 11N11HEIM CITY PLIINNINQ COMM288ION~ J71NL1ARY Z4, 1983 83-45
oould di~cus~ th~ ~!loct th• Ov~+rlay Zon~ vrould hava on th• pra~~nt soninq
Nith l~qal coun~~l. He •xplain~d he had had indication that thi~ park would
not be includ~d in thio recla~sitiaation and had not r~o~ived tha notia~.
7lnnika Santalahti, J~asiatant Dir~ctor !or Zoninq, expl.ain~d thar• will ba more
parks to be recla~sitied and that this park could ba exaludad lran thia
reala~siliaation and includ~d in the next on~.
1-CTION: Commi~sioner lCinq o!lered a n-oti~n, sacondad by Caauniasioner Bouee
and~MOTION C1-RRIED, Ehat canoidmretioa o! ths Oranqe Grave lbbil~e Villaqe be
exclud~d lrom Raclassilicati.on No. 82-83-19.
Conaaiteionar Hushora returnad L:ha Council Chamber.
THE PUBLIC HBl-RING WAS CIASED.
There wnt e~ reeponse trom the eeventeen paople in th~ eudiance to Coaaniseioner
La C~aira that they really did not underetand what thie Overlay Zona meana.
Jack White, Aeaiatant City Attorney, briefly reviewed the Mobilehome Park
Overlay Ordinance (MPH) and ChairmAn Fry added that it will qive the reaidante
a little mdded protection so that e- park owner could not just give them a
30-day notice to move v~ithout qoinq throuqh certein procedures.
Comaniesioner La Claire pointed out to thoee present that they can get a copy
of the ozdinance at the Planninq Department counter and someone in the
Planninq Depnrtment could explain the ordinance to them.
ACTIONs Commissioner Kinq otfered a awtion, aeconded by Commisaloner Bouae,
and MOTION C1~--RAISU, that the Anaheim City Plaru~inq Conuaieaion has reviewed the
proposal to secleasity eubject propertiea from the RS-1--43,000 (Residential,
Aqricultural) Zone to the RS-A-43,000 MHP (Residential, Agricultural, Mobile
Home Park) Zone on Parcel A(Del Prado), a rectanqularly-ahapAd percel o! land
consieting of approximetely 13.6 acrea lxated on tha eaet eide of Euclid
Street approximatel~- 546 feet south o! the centerline ot Cerritos Avenue~
Parcel B(Satellite !~lobilehaae Park) an irreqularly-shaped parcel of land
consiatinq nf approximately 16 acres• havinq a trontage of appz~oximately 1100
feet on the east side of Haster Street, the northerly boundary of subiect
propazty being located approximately 195 leet south of the centerli~ Qt
l(ritella Avenue, Parcel C(Plantation Mobile 8state) an irreqularly-~a-ped
parcel containinq approximately 10.7 acrea located on the eouthwest eide of
Manchester Avanue approximately 720 teet aoutheast of the centarline of
Kntella Way with a lrontnge of approximataly GA teet an Manchester, Pnrcel D
(Del Ray Mobile Eetates) an izregularly-ehaped parcel of land consistinq of
approximately 10 ncrea, loaated on tha aouthwee~t aide o! Mancheeter Avenue
approximately 1600 feat northwast o~ the center.line ot Orangewood Avenue,
Parcel S(Ponderoea Idmbile 8etatea) an irregul~zly-shaped parcal consistinq
approximately 24.35 acrea, having a lzontaqe o!' approximately 525 feat on the
eouthweet eide of Mancheeter Avenue and extendir.q west~rly to Lewis Street,
and a lrontage of approximately 841 fe~t on Lewis Street, Parcel G(Sunkist
Gardens) an irreqularly-shaped parcel of land conaieting of app~oximately 32
acrea located northessterly of the intereaction ~~~f Cerritos ~-venue and Sunkiat
Street, havinq a trontagm ot approximately 983 tQ~t on the aaat aide of
Sunkist Stxeet and Parael H(Oranqe Trae Mobile park) an irregularly-e~aped
parcel containinq approximately 25 acra• located on the east aide of Douqlaes
R~ad appxoximataly ~.080 fsat north ot tha centarline o! Katalla Avenuei and
doss hareby apprave the Neqativa Declaration lrom the raquiramsnt to prapare
~~
~
~ ~
MINUTEB ~ 11NlWEIM CIR'Y P'La1tiN INti COMMI88IOt~1 ~ J11N~111RY Z4 , 198a
93-46
an snvironm~ntel i~qpaot r~port on th~ baai~ that th~r~ would be no siqnilicant
individual or vumul~tiv~ edvsr~• ~nvironmantal impact du~ to bha ~pproval o!
~hi~ N~qative 1~alaration •inv• th• 7-naheim ~ienerai Plen d~aiqnat~~ para~l 1-
!or m~dium den~itiy reaid~nLi.al l~nd uro~, Paro~l• 8, C and D!or ooaro~rolaZ
r~ar~ation is~d us~a, Parc~l B!or meQiwn density r~~id~ntial land uoes,
P~rc~l Ci !oz low, m~diuta-d~n~ity land usas and Parosl H!ox general indu~trial
land u~e~ commenourat• aith th• propossit that no sansitiv~ ~nvironm~ntal
~mpeat~ ar• involv~4 in th• proposalt thst th• Iaitial 8tudy submitted by tha
petitioner indicat~s no signiticant individuel or aumul~tive adv~rs~
enviranuNntal impact~t and that the Naqativs D~alara~ion ~ubatantiating the
loragoing l4ndinqs i• on ~ile in the City of 1-n~heim Planning Depertcaent.
Conanieeloner 1Cing o!lared R~solution No. PC83-18 and moved !or ite passaq~ an(!
adoption thet the AnahAim City Planning Commi~.ion doea hareby qrant
Rsclessilication No. 82-8~-19, in part, deletinq parcal 6, unconditioaelly.
On roll cell, the loreqoing re~alution waa passed by the folloarinq vote:
1-ySBs BW11S, BUSHORB, FRY, H8R88T, KING, LA CLAIRE, MC BURNSY
NQBSs NONE
1-888NT: NONE
Jack Whita, Aesietanti City Attorney, praeented khe writtan riqht to appeal the
Planninq Commission's decision within 22 dayA to the City Council.
ITEN! N0. 5. EIR NRGATIVE DECLARATION AND RBCI.ASSIFIGTIOtd NQ. 82-83-18
PUHLIC HEARIN6. REQUE8T8D SY THE CITY OF ANAH~IM, PLIWNING COI~+tIBSION, P.O.
Box 3222, ]lnaheim, CA 92803. Property deacribed as a rectanqularly•shaped
parcal of land consiating of epproximately 1.04 acreB located at the northeast
cornar oi North Stre~t and Claudina Straet and lurther deocribed ae 201, 207,
211, 215, 219 and 225 EasC North Street.
RB-7200 to RM-2400
There were approxiaiately eleven persons i~dicating their presence in
opposition to eubject request and althouqh the statf report wae not read, it
is rePerred to and made n part of the minutes.
Dean 3harer, Aesxiate Planner, axplained aubject patition was initiated by
st~f~ at the requeat ef six (5) property owners ot eubject propertiee. He
explained the aqent eubmitted a lettnr siqned by six property awmers in thie
block requeatinq the reclassitication. He stated the nerv zoning would parmit
a eecond unit to be constructad on sech of the lots.
Bob Speake atated he wae the property rnmer who iaitiated the petition for
thia ace~~ning and aince then, aome o! the people have objected. He stated he
is aot qoing to build a lot of unita un the property, but wants to cvnatruct a
sinqle unit. He etated he haa baen at thie location fur saventeen yeare and
vrould 11ke to haer what the oppoeition has to sa~y.
Marrill Van Wagonsr, 215 E• North 8traet, stated if ls~c. Speaka builde a
2-story unit adjacent to thesr property, they Mould lose iheir privaey in the
baakyard and she doea aot want har proparty re~oned. She claritiad ah~e had
signed e petition requeatiing thie reclaaeitieation, but that had }aeen a
mistake and she had x~ot euider~tood ahat ah~ Mes siqaing. 8h~ stated she does
aoti want anymore autaa-obila• in the araa.
MINUTSB, lW1~1SIM CI'PY PI+~-titilNQ COMI~lI88ION, J71Np~RY 14, 1983 83-47
1la~es e~ru~i~, Z07 ~. North Str~~t, Msh~ia, •t~t~a •h• •iqn~d the p~tition
r~quertinq this real~s~ilic~tion bu~ d~cid~d l~t~r eha~ ~h• should not have
•ign~d it b~aau~~ th~y do nct hav~ snauqh perki~nq. Sh• add~d l~t~r the peopl•
who liv~ on Mill• Driv• ~nd tho~~ in the 700 and 8~0 block• o! Claudina and
Philad~lphiR came over with quo~tion~ r~qardinq tha aation. 9h• ~tat~d they
all •iqn~d Mithout thinking, but th~y did ~-ak Ilr. Sp~~k~ ~a •xplain th• plans
on sevoc~l occaai~n~. 8he stat~d l•h~y are v~ry muah aqain~t having thi~
propertr r~soned and do not wank the com~~>tion and suqqa~te~ waiting 10 or 15
years b~Lore resoninq the prcp~rty.
Mrs. Bertha Mac I.achlen, 219 E. North 8txast, 7-nahoim, •tstad ahe~ aiqned the
petit•ionr but did not roalise that it was ~o includa tha ei~tire blockt that
Mr. Speaka telked to har ~bout buildinq a 4--caz qeraqe with 2 uni~s ebovt~ it,
so ha would havo extra ir:ome altar he rstirea. Sha stat~d she is concesned
beceuse she did not know what wou1Q ba built on the cornez ~ext to her and if
this is approved, enything could be built there. 8he steted she hs• lived
thera !or 23 years end keepo her property well ~°aintain~d and did not want
~~1yo~ne to build cheap epartment• next door. 8he Atated, in addition, she was
concernad about conqeAtion and parking.
Mrs. 1lqnee Erickson, 301 8. North Street, Aneheim, etated ~he did not agrae or
di0aqree with this racla~eilication and thouqht nr~t peopl• had undarstood it
to be the rezoninq of Mr. Speakee pr~perty only, but if thie ie epproved,
anyona could atart to build a second un.iC on their pr.operty. She etsted there
are only ainqle-tan~ily reaidencea in this area and the area is being
rejuvenated and several people have spent a lot oi aoney on thsir pseoertias
and allowinq this aecond unit aould be detrirental because of parkinq and
would br.ng too meny fatniliea into the area and they are- opposed to it.
De+n Sherer, 1-saociate Pisnner, explAined the ~ity did raceive a letter signed
by six varifi:.! proF+erty owners requesting this raclassiticationt however, the
ar:tion wes initiated at Che raquest of one single property ownmr who did have
a ~+rittan consent trom the othere. tie etated he was quit~ surpzised that
three of the eix owners havo decided to dr~p o~at o! the action and that the
Planning Commiesion has khe option of dRnyinq thR 6ntire request or npproving
the rexoning oP any aingle lot.
Mr. Speake stated hee did disaues thia fully with hia neiqhbors rnd they were
in agreement end there a~rd only about 12 or 15 housas in the araa which have
not been zoned for multipla-family residential uaes. He ~tated he hopes hia
neiqhbors are not mn3 at himt however, he would like to make an iavestrtient on
hiu property on which he cnn qet a return.
TH8 PUBLZC E3FJIRING W1-8 CIASED.
Chairman Fry etatad the lots in this block are bet+ter than averaqe, in eize,
pKCept fAr the two end lots and he aaswned some people do not object to an
individual situation, but do object to the rezoninq of the eatire block.
Con~niseloner Herbat etated in certain aitustione, rezoninq hae bean allowed
where there has been lot adeambly whera a project could Tie built tt~Lt would
not be detrimental to the area, but he did not think thie area is ready for
re:oning and the tia~inq ia not rights howsver, in the luture with land
asaembly, it could be a possibility. He addad if apartments are permitt0d on
thesa singla-lemily lota nor, it would lorego any rehabilitation in the future
and, in hio opinion, spproval o! this xequeat !or juet Mr. Sgeake'a property
vrould be ~pot soninq.
~
.
MINUT$8, 11NAHxIM CITY PI.IINNINt3 COMMISSION, J11NU11RX 14, 1983 83-48
R~spondinq to Ce~ami~sion~r L~ Claire r~qardinq r~c~nt 8tate legialation
p~rmittinq qrsnny housinq, Jaok Nhit~, Aa~istant City Attorn~y, explain~d
th~r~ vrer~ tvro raaent law• en~ated, on• providss tha~ ~tt~r January 1, 1983,
a~yone aan aonstruct a s~oond re~idential unit on th~ir singl~-lamily sonad
prop~rty i~ tha unit camplia• with s~ wral crit~ria •uch a~ the ~is~ ot th~
unit (mu~t b~ und~r 675 •quar• l~at), and it aust ba ut~d ao a rantel unit !or
one or two p~r~ons (both ov~r 60 year~ o! ag~) ~nd th~t th~ unit• mu~t comply
with all th• ~~tback~, h~ight and dsn~ity rtquir~arnta o! th• underlyinq
toningj ana tha~: th• s~cond law provideo that a~econd unit ba ellowed which
coa-pli~s with ail requirua~ntis, other than d~n~i~y, i! a conditional uea
pormit is grant~d by th• City and that law bscome~ e!lsctive alter July 1,
1983, and that thas~e lewa would override local jurisdiction~.
11CTIONr Co~amienionar Harbet o!lersd s m~tion, aecondad by Coannieoioner King
and MOT20N CARRIED, thet the 1lnahaim City Planning Comaaiasion hes raviewed the
propoeel to pers-:t realassitication oi 4uDject proparty lrom the RS-7200
(Reaidential, Stn~~ls-Fa~nily) 2ons to the RM-2400 (TLe~id~ntiel,
Mull•iple-Famtly) ti.une an e rectangularly-shaped parcel o! land con~istinq o!
approxitaately 1.Qd e~:rea l.oceted at the northeaet corner o! North Street and
Clau9ina 8treat and lurther described aa 201, 207, 211, 215, 219 end 225 E.
North Streett and doas hereby approve the Nsgative Osclaxetion tram the
requirement to prepdre an envirormtental impect report on the baeis that there
vrould ba no signiticant individual or cumulative adverse onvironmentel it~aCt
dua to the ~proval ot thie Neqative Declaration aince the J-nahe.im General
Plen desiqnatee the subject property for medium denaity residen~inl land uees
co~nneneurate with the propoeelt that no senaitive enviroruaentel impacte are
invnlved in the proposalt thet the IniGial Study submitted by the petitionsr
~ndicates no signilicant individual or cumulstive advers4 environmentel
impactet and that the Neqative Declaration substantiatinq the loreqoinq
findings is on file in the City of Aneheim Plenning Aepartment.
Commisaloner Herbat otfered Resolution No. PC63-19 and moved for its pas~aqe
~.nd adoption that the Anahsim City Planning Commiaaion does haraby deny
Feclasaitication No. 82-83-18 on the baeis that the azea ie not riqht for
rezoninq dt this time and there are other ways within the new State laws under
whSch ~ha property ownar might be able k~ accomplish what he wants.
On roll call, the foreqoinq reaolution wau passed by the followinq vot~e:
AYESs BOUAS~ BUSHORE, FRY, HERSST, KING, I.A CI.~IRE~ MC BUR1~lEY
NOEB: NONE
ABSENTs NONE
;Jack Wh1te, Aseistnnt city 1~etornay, prese,nted ths v+zitten riqht to appesl the
Planninq Commioeion's decision within 22 days to the City Council.
ITEM NO. 6. 8IR NEGi+TTVB D8CWIRATI~ , l.'•!D CONDITIONl1:~ USE PSRMIT t70. 2409
PUBLIC HRARING. OWNER: ROGB~t C. AND ANN R. 3TIJLL, 1801 Penhall Way, Anaheim,
C11 92801. 11GENT: SOUTHSRN PACIFSC COt~lI1NIC11TION8 COMPIINY, 433 Airport
Bou~evard, Suite 424, Durlinqame, CA 9401(1. Propdrty doscribed as a
ractangularly-ehaped parcal of land consisting o! appx~oxl~mately 2.56 acrea,
1776 West Penhall WaS'
To permit a 180-loo+t hiqh communications towsr in tha ML Zone.
MII~UTSB, 112~tANEIM CITY PL11NltINO COMNI88ION• J11NUJ1RY ~4, 1483 83-49
Thsr• Ma• no on~ indicating their pr~asnce in oppo~ition to ~ubjeat requ~st
snd elthouqh the •ta!! r~port MA/ not read, it i~ r~lerr~d to and mud~ e part
o! th• minutes.
J~rry Martir-, Sc~uthern Pacitic Ccwauniaetions, 433 1-irp~rt Boul~vard,
Hurlinq~m~, Calilornia, •xpla~ned this will b~ a aoaanuni c~tion~ repsat~r sita
s t~chnioel op~ratinq cent~r, tor handling ell incon-inq/c~utgoinq tsle~hona
c~lls.
Mr. Martin clarili~d !or Chaira~sn Fry that this tower wi 11 be conatructad
rathar trian th• one r~cently approved !or the Cal-Fad builc!1nq.
Commis~lon~r Bu~hora telt tha o~hez conditi~nal u~e permi t recently approved
on Cr~aaent Avenue ~hould be terminsted with Dser- Sharer , Associate Plann~r,
pointinq nut that CUP la atill in the eppaal period~ hovrev~r, once it is
linalised, tha ownsr could r~qu~st tarmination.
Jeck White, l~~eistant City Attor.ney, euqgestad that a condition be added to
thi~ appruvel raquiring thnt that Conditional Uee Pera-.it No. 2402 be
t~rminated beitora buildinq permita are issued.
ACTION: Cona~issioner Herb~t offarad a motion, aac~nded by Commiasioner King
and MOTION CARRIRD, that the 1-naheim City Plenning Cacnai asion has reviewed Lhe
proposal to permit e 180-fo~t hiqh coanauniaationa tower in the NII. (Industrial,
Limited) Zone on ~ rectanqularly-$haped p~rcel ot land consisting o!
approximat~ly 2.56 acra, havinq a lrontaqa o! approximstaly 400 leet on tha
eouth aide o! Penhall Wdy and lurthar described as 1776 W. Fenhall Wayt an3
doea hereby approve the Neqative Daclaration from the requirement to prapare
an environmental impact report on tha besis that there would be no siqnif icant
individual or cumuletive ntlverae environmental impact dua to the approval o!
thia Neqative Declaration eince the AnnheLa General Plan ddsiqnetea the
eubject property !or qenAral industrial lend usee commeneurete with tha
propoealt that no sensitive environmentnl impacta are i:avolved in the
propoeal~ that the Initial Study submitted by the pe~it ioner indicatee no
aiqnit~icant individual or cumuletive adverse environmes~tal impactst and that
the Neqative Declare~tion subetantiatinq the foreqoinq t ind~ngs ia on file in
the City o! Anaheim Planninq Departsaent.
Co~aiesioner Herbet ottered Reaolution No. PC83-20 and ninved for ita pasaaqe
and adoptio~: that the 7~-naheim City Planning Comaiission does hereln• gr.ant
Condltional Use Permit No. 2409 subject to Intardepartmental Committee
recaamaendationa inclu3ing a c~ndi:ion that the ovmer ehall suba-it a letter
requeetinq termination ~f Conditional I1ee Perait No. 2 4 02 prior to obtaininq
building permits.
On roll call, the foreqoing resolution was paesed by the followinq vote:
Ayggs $OtJAS, SU3HORS, FRY, HERBST~ KING, L11 CLAIRE~ MC BURNEY
NOESs NONE
Ag88NT s Y~ON$
Jack White, lhesietant City Attornay~ prasented the wr ittea riqht to appeal the
Planniag Commission'e decision vrithin 22 days to the City Council.
!
s t
NIMlTSB, 11l17-HEIM CITY PL11N1iIU1G COt~WI88I0N, J71NU1-RY 2~, 1983 83-50
xTlM NO. 7. EIR N~fil1TIVS D~CIJ-R]1TIOl~1 11ND VI1RI11l1C~ NO. 3318
PUSLIC IiE1-RI11G. Oi/NERB~ CH710-SHONa GH~1, ET 111.r 9166 Helm J-wnua, 1-ountain
V~il~y, CA 92708. 71GSNT~ ~R~NX CK~TI ~ 18019 Sky Park Circl~, "E", Zrvina, Cl-
9Z714. Prop~rty d~scriMd as a rectanqularly-ahaped parael of land con~i~tinq
o! approxin-rt~ly 1.97 aar~e, 2171 South Herbor Boulav~rd (Harbor Inn
Travelodq~).
Waiv~r o! minimum nwnber o! parking apaces to conetruat a lobby and o!lice
add~tion to an .xi.sLing motel.
Thsrs wa~ no ona indicatinq their pxesance ~n oppotition to eubject raquapt
snd althouqh the stalt ~~port wa• not read, it ie rsterred to and meida a pert
o! the minutea.
Frank Chui, agart, expininad thia property currently ha• 128 units snd thay
would like to expand the property to include a lobby.
THE PUBLIC HSARING WllB CLOSED.
1~CTI~N~ Caamission~ King otlerad a motion, seconded by C~naissioner Bouea
and MOTION Cl-RRIED, that the ]lnaheim Ci~y Planning Co~mniovion has reviewed the
proposal to construct e lobby and oftice addition to an existing motel with
w~ivar o! minimum nwabsr ot psrking spetcee on n r~ctanqularly-~heped parcel ot
land coneistinq ot npproximately 1.97 ras, havinq approximate lrontaqee of
315 ~eet on the weat eide o! Harbor Boulsvard, and 315 leat on the enat siae
of Mnllul Dri~e and turther described ar~ 2171 South Harbor Soulaverd (Harbor
Inn Travelodqe)t and does hereby approve tha Neqative Daalaration from the
requirement to prepnre an environmental iatipect report on the basls that there
would be no eiqniticant individual or cumulative advarae environmentnl impaat
due to tha approval of this Neqative Daclsration eince the Anahaim Genarel
Plan designntar the subjact property !or qeneral commszcial land uoas
commansurate with the proposalr that no sensitive environmental iaq~ects are
involved in t'~~ propoaalt that the Initial Study submitta d by the petitioner
indicatea no siqnificant individual or cumulative adveree environmental
impactat and that the Ne qative Declaration substantiatinq the foreqoinq
~indinqa is on file in the City o! Anaheim Plnnninq Department.
Cammiasioner Kinq olfered Resolution No. PC83-21 and naved for its passege ~^d
adoption that the Anaheim City Planninq Cao~mission doee hareby grant Variar.
No. 3318 on the basie that the request is minimal and that the parkinq spsces,
as propoaed would exceed the parkinq r~quiremente of the newly adopted parkinq
~ordinance and subject to Interdepartmental Commaittea recommendationa.
O~n roll call, the Poreqoinq resolution waa passad by the following vutea
hYES s BOU71S • BUSHOR~ . FRY , HERSST ~ RING , LA CLAI RE ~ NC BZIRNSY
N088s NONE
ABSENTs NONB
Jack White, l~eeistanx City l~ttornay, preaented t2+ wzitten right to appeal the
Planning Conm~iseic+n'e decision within 2Z days to tha City Council.
~ ~},,
i
11I:IUTEB, lINAHEIM CI'Y'Y PLAZZNIti(i COMMlI88IOti~ J11NU11RY Z4, 1983 83-51
xTEM N0. 8. EIR Nm(il1TIVE DECL)1A11TION 1WD V11RI71t~CE NO. 3319
.~..~~..~..~~...
~USLIC HEJIRINCi. 01itiERB+ JOHN /-ND 111~t1~13 1CR11.T]-CIC, P.O. Box 3716, 1lnaheim, C~1
9Z803. Prop~rty d~aarib~d a~ a rectanqularly-shap~d parcal o! land con~i~tinq
o! approximstely 11,956 aquara fs~t. 1106 Ws~t Narth Stre~t.
Waiv~r• o! mininoun- lot a:•sa, minimum lot width and rsquired lot lronteqa to
sstablish a 2-lot subdivision.
Thara ware •ix~ean peroons indicsting their pr~~ence in opposition to .ubjaati
reque~t and although the atelf raport waa not r~sd, it is rat~rred to and n-ade
a part o! the minutiss.
John Krajscic, 1006 Campbell, owner. was pres~nt to snswer eny questions.
William Voes, 1104 W. Narth Straet, 1~rtaheim, pres~+nted n•tition aiqned by 42
rasidenta who are against putting another houae on this proparty and indiceted
29 0! those peopls who ~iqned the p~tikion wer~ on the list of property or+ners
within 300 leet o! subject property. He statad he is oppoeed to the requeot
becsusa moet o! the housee in tha sree ere sinqle-fsmily rssidenca~ and that
they all have the aame emount of property and that lagt Sunday there w~re 4 tc
5 vehicles parked on that property, nven an the lront lawn, and he wae
cancerned with addl.tional conetruct ion, there would be more cars.
cl.aude Wilaon atated he liveu just west of subject property and that everybody
as in oppoeition to the request end it eppeers the owner bouqht the property
intending to make thie proposal mnd thai. i! he had lived there !or a lonq time
and then wanted to build an ndditional u~iit, they might be more conaiderate.
Ted S+ems, 1128 W. North Street, Anaheita, atdted hia lot is just as Diq as
aubjact property end that he alao has saae qrandchildren that he would like to
build a unit for and he lelt approvinq this requeet would etart a precedent
and ttRnt he i.s thoroughly against it. Ha atat~d thay do not need more housas
in this area, but do need more side~+niks to keep the elsmentary school
children off the etreeta.
Mr. iCrajacic etated thie property hns been dedicated !or aidewalks and his ie
the only property with sidewalks. Ha etatad tha property has a cizculnr
driveway and it ie dangarous to back out onta the atreet, even thouqr it was
built to the City's specificationa and that ia the reaaon care were parkeJ on
the :awn. He stated he moved that house on the property and that ha Mas had a
lot o! calla lrom people eonqratulating him on the beautitul job. He stated 2
or 3 property owrers have been qiven permiasion to do this same thing in that
area.
THE PUBLIC HBARING WAS CLOSED.
Commisaianer La Claire pointed out that property owners can build an
additional unit on their property und~r racently enactad State laks under
certafn circuiastancas !or a relative, etc. but ahe could not eee any rea4on to
qrant the Maiverm since this ia a sinqla-tamily area and the reaidenta are
oppoted to the requeet.
ACTIONs Commiasioner La Claire oftered a motion, seco:~ded by Cemeaissioner
go sau~ nd MOTIpl~1 C1IRRIEA, that the Anaheim City Planninq Commireion has
reviewsd tha propcysal to eatablish a 2-let subdiviaion rrith waivera o! mi~nimum
~~.
MINt1TS8, 71N11}tEIM CITY Pl.ANNIpG COMOII88ION, JANIJIIRY 24, 1983 83-52
lat •r~a, oainimum loti width and rsquir~d lot lrontage on a
reatangularly-~hap~d para~l o! land consistinq o! approxiiaat~ly 11,956 squara
le~t, h~vinq a lrontiaq~ o! ~pproxia-etely 9S te~t on th~ ~outh sid~ o! Noith
8tr~~t and lurth~r d~~cri2»d a~ 1106 W. North Sls~~ett and doa• h~r~by approve
the N~qativ~ Daalaration lran tha r~quir~n-~nt to pr~para an env~.ronm~ntel
impacL r~port on th~ ba~i• thet ther~ ~+~ould ba no •iqnilicenL individual or
cuaaulativ~ adve:a• •nviror~m~nt~l impact due to ths approval o! ~.hi~ N~getiva
D~ciaration since the 7~nRh~im aensral Plan ~!~~ignata• th• subject prop~rty !or
loa d~n~ity rasidantial land ua~• comm~ns~irats with tha proposalt th~t no
~~n~itive •nvirona~sntal iu~aots ara involved in th• propa~alt that th• Initial
8tudy nubmittad by the p~titioner indicaC~~ no signiticant individual or
cumulntiva adveXte environmental impacta+ and that the Neqntive Dsclaration
substantiating the foreqoing lindings is on lila in the City o! Anaheim
Plenninq Department.
Commiasionsr T.a Cl.airs offerad Resolution No. PC83-22 and a-oved !or its
paasaqa and adoptton that ~he Anahelea City Planninq Cocmni~~ion does hereby
dany Variance No. 3319 on the ~asis that no hardship waa demonotrated
partaining to tha proporty'~ topography, ~ize~, shape or surrounding.
On rall call, the fareq~.inq resolution wes paesed by the follawinq vote:
AX88: BOUAB, BUSHORB, FRY, IlERBBT• KING, L11 CLAIRE, MC BURNLY
N0~8s NONB
A888NT: NONE
Jack White. 1lsaietant City A~ttorney, prasented the written riqht to .~ppeal the
Planninq Commissian'a deciiion within 22 days to the City Gouncil.
ITEM NO. 9. ENVIRONMBNTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 253 (BRr.'VZOUSLY APPROVED) AhD
TENTATIVE MA~ OF TRACT NO. 11830
PUBLIC HEARING. O~WNSRS s ALBBRT BOkCH11RD, ICENNBTF! L. L1IRSEN, 5915 Hurcherd
!-vanus, Los 1-ngeles, CA 90034, AND ROY W. W-BEB, 2651 W. Lin:oln 1lvanue,
Anaheim, CA 92801. 11GENT: GFELLBR DL~VSI,OPMEN".' COlIPANY, 228 N. lrlain Street,
Tustin, G 92680. Property described aa conelating of •evernl parcele
totallinq approximately 19.57 acres, 2925 West I.,incoln Aver.ue (Lincoln Beach
Mobile Mnnor Park).
To establiah an 8-lot, 639-unit, RM-1000 Zone eubdiviaion.
There were several interestad persanm indicatinq their presence to eubjeat
request and althouqh the sta!! report was not read, it ie reterred to and made
s pazt of th~n minutos.
Ralph 8parqo repreaenting the Gleller Development Company, 228 N. Main Street,
Tustin, wns preaent to ensv+er any queetions.
Jaak White, Aseistant City Attorney, explained the Planninq Co-.a-is~ion hae
already held a public hearinq to approve the zoninq end variance !or the
conatruction of the 639-nnit coadominium complex on tha property known as the
Lincola Hsach Mobilehoma Park and it ip requirad that tha City approve a
subdiviaion map which allows parcalization o! the eubject property. He statad
this is no di!lereat than tha projact p~evi~~ely approved and appa~oval today
viould in no May permit deviation lran what has already been approved and the
aritmria impoaed, ona of which vrould be t}~3 adaquata p~ovision made for the
relocation and paymant ot reloaation costs to tha tsnan..~.
MINUT88, J-NIWEIM CITY PLJ1NNIt8(i COMM288IaN, J1-NU11RY 24, 1983 83-53
A. J. Defatio, 8paa• 34, e~kad it av~r,yone vrould bs nave~ at one *ima or i!
tha tsnanto ~-~ould M movad in pha~e• a~ tha proj~ct ie built.
Jaak WhitQ ex~.'ained the condition o! the re~olution provides '~et relocAtion
b~n~lita shell bs paid to each mobilahocua owner prior tn th• issuRnc~ o! sny
huildinq permit !or any phase o! tha developeant othor than pha~e^ 1 and 2
which nr• on property thaC does not involve the mcbilehom~ t~nante and al~o
thet any mobilehane ovmer who relocate~t lran the perk nt any time elter the
dats o! i~suance o! grading permita !or any phase n! tha devalopiaant, ~hall be
paid benefiEa at the eaaie time ea he tarmf.natss the tananc,y providing thet a
mnxic-utn o! lOt of the mobilahome pw~k owners are a!locded that prepayment. He
atated tha deta for tl~a payiaent o! the remaining 9Q1 wo~ld be prinr to the
iaeuence o! buildinq permit. !or any pha~e other than phasas 1 or 2 or prior
to July 1, 1985, whichsvar ~ccurs lir~t, so the tenanta ~here now would ba
allowad ta ramein until such time ar development starts at their phese et
which time they would be requirad c be relocated and peid.
Mr. Defazio queetioned tha 125-mile radius~with Chairman Fxy explaini~q that
125-mile radiue does not mean thnt an,yone hae t~ be moveci 125 milee awsy, but
does allow that in the dvent a person wishes to a-ove to a park in Sdn OSego,
they would still be peid. Mr. Defezio indicated he now underatnnds that is
juat a sefeguard.
It was noted Environtnental Impact Report No. 253, Recleeeii~cation No. 82~83-4
and Vsriance No. 3306 (to conetructi a 639-unit condominium cot~lex with
waivers of a) required lot frontage, b) maximwa atructurnl height, c) ~ninimum
lloor erea, d) minimum landecnped setback, e) m'.nidaim rearedtional-leisure
aren, !) minimum distance between buildings and, g) minimum number and type of
parking epncee) was approved by the Planninq Coc~aission on Nov~a~ber 29, 1982.
The applicant now requests aFpraval o! a tentative trect a~ap for the
aubdiviaidn of the proparty.
ACTIC1Ns Commieaioner Herbat offexed a motion, aeconded by Coam~iasioner
McBurtiey and MOTION CARRiED, that the Anaheim City Planninq Commiaeion doea
hereby lind that the proposed subdivieion, toqetl~er with l.ts design and
improvement, is coneistent with r,he City o~ Anaheim Genexal Plan, ae required
by Gavernment Code Seation 66473.5t nnd theet purauant to Government Code
Section 66427.4 the P~anninq Comn-isaion doea hereby tind that the aubdivider
is being required to take stcpa to mitiqate eny siqsiilicant adverse impact of
the convereion on the nbility o~ dieplaced mobilehome park ree.Ldente to find
adequate space in a mobilehome park in that they will be providinq replacement
houeinq and ter~ants will be o!lered firet right of refaeal on a aondominium
unit and every effort will be made to mnke th8 units affordable to tenanta
desirinq them aT~ thr~t tenants mny hdvg the option of beinq relocated ~o a:~ew
proposed ehelter mobilehome park currently beinq examined~ and therefore, does
approve Tentative Map of Tract No. 11830 to eatablish an 8-lot, 639 uait
RM-1000 (Reeidentinl, Multiple-Family) Zone eubdi•~ision, subject to the
followinq conditions.
1. That trash storage arnae ehall be provided in accordancp with
npproved plans on lile with the O!lice ot the Exacuti.ve Director of
Public Worke.
2. That firo hydre~nts ahn],l be iastalled and charqed ns required an,
determined to ba naceasary by the Cbief o! the Fire Depart~uent prior
to com~aencement o! structural lraming.
MIliUTaB~ IINIWEIM C~TY PIJINNING CdQ1I88ION, J71NL1~RY 24, 1983 83•b4
3. T'het ~ubj~c'_ p~op~rty ~hall b~ served by underqround utiili~ie,~.
4. That drain~q~ o! ~ubj~cr prop~rty ~hail b~ dispossd o! in a mann~r
satisfactory to ~he Cit.~ Bnqine~r.
5. In th~ ~v~nt thet •ubj~ct prop~rty i~ to be divid~d !or the purpo~e
ot ,~ale, l~as~, or financing, s pe~xcal aap shall bs epproved by the
City o! 1-nah~im eu~d b~ rsoordad in th• Ottic• o! the Oranqe County
Raoord~r. Ths approvel o! a paroal map, or the i~auancs o! building
permits to sllow the con~truction ot 0aid projact in c~ore than one
phas• a! dav~lopiaant, ahall be 0ubject to the completion o! traeh
removal !or tt^ area cow rad by said pha~e o! deWelopmsnt in
accordance with the approvud Trash Removel Plan.
6. Thet the ov,~ner of subject property ehall pay to the City o~ 1-neheim
the appropriate park and racreation in-lieu tees as datertained to b~e
appropriete by the City Council, said lAOS to be pnid at the tims
the building permit ie i~~uad. Alt~rnntively, the ows~er may
conetruct improvamenta at City parks. Such improvaa~nts ahell ba
ma3e only i~ epprov~d by tha Park~ and Recraation Departmant.
7. That al.t privete streeta ehell be developfd in accordance aith the
City of Anaheim's ~tandnrd Detail No. 122 !or private etreeta,
includinq inetallatioa o~ street neme siqrsg. Plana !or the privAte
etreet liqhting, as required by ".he atandard detail, ehall bR
submitted to the Buildinq Divieian !or epproval and incluston with
the buildinq plane prior to issuence oP buildinq penaits. (Private
streets are those which provide primary acceas nnd/or circulation
within the project.)
B. If pera~nnent street name siqns tiave not basn inatalled, temporsry
atra~t name siqna shall be installed prinr to any ~ccupancy.
9. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay the tza!!ic siqnal
aaeeaement fee (Orc~inance No. 3896), in an amount as ~eiermined by
the City Council, for each new dwellinq unit prior to the issuance
of a building permit.
10. That an o!lsite etorm ~Irain to the Carbor. Creek Flood Control
Channel as approved by the City 8nqineer ahall be conetructad and
operational prior to the start of any qradinq ot Area 3 unlesa
previously required by the Ci~~~ $nqineer ae a reeult of material
found in the grading of Area 2.
11. That the of~aite sanitary sewer ahall be conatructed and ~unctional
prior to any occupancy of Area 2 unlese required by the ;:ity
Bnqineer at an earlier time.
12. That r.o or.-site drainage ahall be permitted to flow onto Lincoln
]~venue .
13. That the design of on-site dralnaqe atructures shall bn approvad by
the City 8nqinear pzior to the start of any gradinq on euL~jact site.
MINU'PEB, AN11ElEJM CITY P'I.7INNINCi Cf~alI88I0N, ~ANUARY 24, 1983 83-55
~.4. That e~eparats qradinq plan ~hall be pr~par~d snd •pproved by tha
City 1Cnqin~~r !or •ach oonttruotion pha~• and an 1-i Graded Pl~n
•hall b~ pr~par~d, certiti~d, and apprav~d !or •ech phas~ prior to
~tart o! gradinq on th• n~xt phaa• or at •uah oth~r lat~r time• a~
msy be suthor~z~d by th~ City Engin~~r.
15. That the aeiler iball provide tha purcha~er o! ~~ch aondotainium unit
with written intormation concerning ]-nahaim Municipal Cod~ 14.32.500
pertaininq to "parking ra~trictsd to lacilitate ~tra~t ~a~epinq."
Such written intonnation will clsarly indicate when on-strs~t
parking i:. prohibitsd and the penelty tor violation.
16. That "No Parkinq !or Straet Sweepinq" eigna shall be inatalled prior
to linal etramt inspection as rsqulred by the Public Works H~cocutive
Diractnz in accordance with epacilicationg on lil~ with the Straet
Ma~ntenanae Divieion.
17. That appropriate water aseessment feee as dsterminad by the O!lice
ot Utilitiea Genara2 ~laruiger ~hall be paid to the City ot Anaheim
prior to the ieeuenca o! a buil.ding pez~rnit.
18. Thet the msdinn ialand modilication in Lincoln l~venue ahall be
completed prior to any ocaupancy i~~ Phase 1.
19~ That a compreheneive on-eita vehicular acceas and pnrkinq plen
which, unlese otherwise epproved by the City Trattic Engineer, ahall
show tandem perkinq along only one eida of each drivawey aisle shall
be eubeaitt~d by the daveloper/owner for revi~w and approval by the
: City Traffic Engineer prior to the issuance o! buildinq parmits.
~ 20. That a detailed Trash Remnvnl Plan shall be eubmitted by the
~ developer/owner for review end approval by the City and other
~
~ concArnAd public aqencies prior to approval of qradinq plans oi
~ iseuance of building permita, whichever occurs first, tor any area
~ or phau~~ of such development upon Which aaid land~ill currently
exiets.
21.(a3 That the owner(s) of the ~subject property ahall pay to eacn
nabilehome o~+ner as identified in th~ conversion impact report
relocation benefita in the reepective amounte as set ~orth on
Bxhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this
refer~nce, or auch other henefita ae mutually aqreed upon
betwmen the park owner aad the mobilehome owner. Saia
relxation benelite ahall be paid to eacr. mobilehome owner, and
proof ther~ ~f eubmitted to City in a form satiefactory to the
City Attorney, prior to the issuance ot any buildinq permit Por
eny phase or portion of the paroposed development other th~n
theae portiona identitied ae Phase 1 and Phese 2 ae ahown on
the Phasinq Ptan, bfieet 4, Raviaion No. 1 of plnne~ on lile in
the Planning Department o! the City of Anaheim, or prior to
July 7., 1985, whichever occure fi.rak.
(b) Thati not withmtandinq eubp~ragraph (a) nbov~, any mobilehome
rnmer who raloaatea from the park at any time atter tha data at
iesuance of grading permit~ for eny phaee ot the deralopment
shall bs paid said relocation benafita contamporaneous v~ith the
termination o! edch tenan~cy provided, however, that such
MI1Rt1T~8, AN~IM CITY PL~INNING COMNI88ICN, J111~tU7~RY Z4, 1963 83-56
Rdvanoa payment~ pursuant to thi• .ubp+~r~qraph (b) n~~d not b~ m~d~ at any
time in a~vana~ o! th~ d~t• oth~rvri~~ ~ati lorth in ~ubparaqraph (a) to awr•
tl~an t~n p~rcent o! auoh nwbil~hoa~ rnmara.
(c) Th~t tih~ amc~unt o! •a1d r~location benalite puyabta to ~~ah
mobil~ho~ne ownsr pureuant to •ubparagraph (a) or (b) above,
•hel~ ba ~ncreased by an anaunt aqual to any inarease in tha
Consutner Prlca indax !or Urban Wege Eernar~ nn~. ClAriciil
workv.s, All itemA, Lo~ Anqelea-Long neach Mstropolitan Ar~a
(1967~100), published by the Unitad State• Department o! Let~or,
8ureau o! Lsbor SLatistice ("Index"), vrhich is publishcd
nearest to th• date o!' thia resolution as canparsd to the Index
mosi recently publiahdd prior to the dets ot payment o! said
relocetion b.~nefita.
(d) That the ownar o! the subject property ahall poat a parlormance
bond in nn amount na torm eatietectory to th4 City Attorney to
gu~rantes ~`e payment o! said relocati~r~ hen~fit~.
22. That prior to iseuance o! buildinq permits, th~ applicant ahell
preeent evidence aatisfactory to the Chie! Building lnspector that
the proposed project le in conlorcnance with Council Po11cy No. 542,
8ound ~ttenuation in Reeidential Projects.
23. That prior to isauance ~! buildinq permite, tha applioant ahnll
present evidance setiafactory to rhe Chief Building Inspector that
the unite will be in conlormance with Noise InAUletion Rtandards
spueitied in the Cnlifornia l~chainistrative Code, Title 25.
24. That should thia subdSvixion be 8eveloped ee aare than one
subdiviaion; each aubdivieion thcreof ahatl be eubmitted in
tantative f~~rm !or approval.
25. That the origin~l documents of the covenanta, conditiona, and
reatrictione and a letter addres~ed to the developer's titla compnny
atiithorizing recordation theraof, shall be submitted to h'~e City
Attorney's Ottice and approved by City l~ttorney's Of e, Public
Util+.ties Department, Huilding Division, and the 8n. ne~erinq
Division prl.or to the tinal tract map appzoval. Said documents, as
zpproved, ahall be recorded in tha O!lica ot the Oranqe County
Recorder.
26. That atreet r-amea ehell be epproved by the City Planning Department
grior to approv~: o~ ~ tinal tract map.
~ ~'
i~
\
y . '
MINUT=8 ~ 111i1WEIM CI^aY P'L~1NlIINO CONMI88ICN r Jl1NOlUtY Z4. 1983
83-Sy
1pCNI8IT "i."
pRQpQSED TENIINT ttEI.OCJ-TION 8!N!l2T8
~-p1~ROXIMI-TE N0. OD' BIN~iLB AR TO'PI1L pROpCB=D
P11YllE'NT
Sp11C~ NpNBER YR8 IN P11RlC D00ffi+E 1fIDS ~
p ~5,4S3 ;
1 e
10 ~ ~~p~pp) 3,91~{ ;
~
Z p 5,472
.~ 16 D 4,9?9 ;
4 ~
S t EXPI-NDO ) 3,866
5 ~ 5,402
6 1~ p 4,644 ;
7 S
15
S ( ~XPAN130 ) 4.287 ;
'
8 5 8 ~~,~pq~ 4,450
9 p 5,466
10 ~ s 4,411
l~ 4 D 5,084
~
12 ~ D ;
5,370
13 16 u 4,946
14 13 D 5.321 ~:
15 l~ s 4,134 ~
16 1 p 4,674 i
17 14 0
~
18 ~'~ b ;
4,194
19 6 ~ +
20 EMPTY p 5r~96 ~'
21 6 p 3,954 ;
22 3 g 2.927 ~
23 4 ~ 5,272 ~
2~1 4 D 5, 068
25
14
p ~
5,455
26 10 p 5,374
27 4 p 3,186 ~
#
28 4 p 5,g19
29 16 D 5,168
30 13 ~ 3,949
31 10 p 3.872
32 4-1/2 p ~,029
33 Z~' D 5.069
~d 13 ~ 4,969
35 ~3 D 5,285
36 4 D 6,280
37 10 D 4.783
38 4 p 4,b'll
39 4 D 3,859
40 5 D 4,/42
41 8 D 5,382
42 l~ D 4,784
43 18 D 5,60C
44 5,044
45 Z D 5,944
46
__~.._._._.,~._._,....,~.r,-~~--,..-
--
~._....._..w
..~,..,.,~,~.....n,.~.,.........~...~
_
_
...._._, ... ..
_ ,
_._ . _ ,._... _ .~_...~,~ ~._ ._..~
,~
_
^'w.~:'_ ..n'^`,'.,."'v;`^P:~~
^~
~ / ~ )
MZNOTIlS~ 11N11p~IN CITY pId11~NZt~fi CO1~I88I~t~l~ JlA1~N71RY Z4, 1983 83~38
d~ 16 ~ 5,61~
48 5 S 3,864
49 lZ D S,lZ~
~0 4 8 4~G87
S1 10 8 3,3b6
ga 4 ~ 4,780
53 SMPTY ~
54 a D 5,189
55 14 8 5,776
56 ~y ~
5 8 3,935
16 D 5,014
13 D 5,052
60 5 8( 8XP11ND0 ) 4, 57.4
61 16 D 5.370
62 16 8 (8XP71ND0) 3,987
63 5 D 5,150
64 5 8 4,330
6~ 5 D 4,879
66 13 D 5,511
67 l~ ~ 5,054
68 S D 5,1b4
69 4 Q 5,245
70 16 S (EXPA~IDO) 3,642
71 B D 3,664
7~ 13 D 4,800
73 5 D 3,83_
~a 10 ~ 4,924
75 5 D 4,802
76 14 D 4,802
77 13 ~D Y~qiZ
78 10 D 4,554
79 5 s 3,817
80 10 D 4,289
el 10 D 3,66a
J2 5 D 3,780
83 p,KpTq ~
84 14 D 5,~5I
85 5 D 5,060
86 10 D 4,194
87 15 D 4~928
88 10 D 5,306
89 4 D 4,872
90 4 D 4,902
91 15 D S,Q78
92 4 D 5,653
93 3 8 4,283
~4 3 D 4,922
95 3 D 4,737
96 lu D 5,022
9'1 13 p 5,s^35
98 l~ ~ 4,402
99 13 D 4,945
100 10 S ~,400
301 10 8 3,120
()
, ,.
83-59
~p~~l~ 11~i~1H~sIN CxTY PIJIPINING CONt1I88I0N~ Jl1lf~J11R1!' R4, 19@3
~•930
10~ 13 D 4,OlZ
103 p 4,794
104 10
D 4,970
105 8 5,001
106 ~o p 4,554
107 8 (BXp11Npp) Z,907
108 3 ~ 4,T09
109 1 8 4, Z83.
110 4
U 4,Z07
111 4 4,983
112 13 ti 4,73«
113 8 0 5,51a
16
16
8
I 8XPl1ND0 )
4~ 8 3 O
115
116 ~TY p
117 ~TY
~ 5,546
6 MONTHB S ( 8XP)-NDO ) 3, 8 38
119 14 D 4,679
120 8 MONTHB D 5,242
121 12
1~ s (~tpANDO) 4,38~
122 D 4,090
123 4 $ 3 r 903
~.24 16 D 5,222
125 4 TpTl1i, pl~YM8NT8 l~560
MINUTES• AN11H8=M C='PY pLJ1NNING~ CbMMI$BION, Jl1NUARY 24, 1983 83-60
ITSM NO. YO
REPORTS 11ND RRC~MM8ND11TION8
Z'he lollowiaq Reporte end R~ao~am~ndstiono •ta!! report• wore pr.eeented but noti
resd.
p. VARIANCS N0. 3241 - Raque~t fran Michael R. 8nqle/C. Robext Langslet 6
Son, Inc• !or an oxtanoion o! time, p~operty laaated nt the southweotarly
cornar of Santa l~r-a Canyon Road and Fairmont Boulevard.
ACTION: Con~iosioner Kinq o~tsred a mation, secon8ed by Commiseioner
Herbst and M~TION CARRI$D, that tha Anaheim City Plenning Commiesion does
hersby qraat a one-yaer retroac~iv~ extensi~n o! time tor Varianca No.
3241 to axpire on Noven~er 2, 1983.
B. VAItIANCB N0. 791 - Requeat from Fred E. Hartmen, Jr., !or termination o!
Variance No. 791 f~r property located at 1040 North Mdqnolia.
Commiseioner Kinq oftered Resolutioa No. PC83-22 and aaved tor ite
passaqe and adoptian that the Anaheim City Planning Comn-ieei~n doea
hereby terminate Variance Nu. 791.
C. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 2186 - Request from Che+rles and Cnrol Pdncheri
!or an exteneion ot time for Conditional Use Permit No. 2186, property
l~ceted at 3601 E. Miraluma Avenue.
ACTIC~7: Co~aiesioner King affered a mntion, secondc~d by Cocm~isaioner
Herbat and MOTION CARRIED, that tha Maheim City Planninq conaaiasion doee
hereby qx'ant d~~-year extension ot ticne for Conditional Use Permit No.
2186 to expire on March 23, 1985.
p. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2293 - Requeat from Michael W• ~`~~ielocatednn
extension of tim~: Eor Conditional Use Pernti.t No. 2293- pr pe Y
at 1400 S. Harbor Houlevazd.
ACTION: Commiesioner Kinq oftered a motion, seconded by Commissioner
Herbet and MOTIUN Cl~RRIR~. that the 1-naheim City Planninq Commiseion doee
hereby qrant a retroactive one-year extension of tiwe for Conditional Uae
Permit No. 2293 to expire on Decembez 31, 1983, with the atipulation that
the westerly driveway on Mancheater Avenue nnd the nartherly driveway :,n
Harbor Houlevard be reawved and replacad with a staroval ofrthegtitaer dnd
sidewalk within a per.iod of ninsty (90) daya of app
extension by Plaruiing Com~nigaion.
g, ~gApDO~IMENT NO. 82-1A - Requegt to a~bandon n former Southern Californin
Edison Company electrical easement acquired by tha City o! Anaheim, As
successor, located west of Beach Boulevard, north of Stonybrook Drive.
.
~ ~ ~ ,~
83•61
MIMITZa- 1~iAH~xM CITY PLlllll'1Ip0 COMMISBICN. J11N~J~1RY Z4, 1983
It w~~ nol~d th~ pl+~t-ninq Dis~otar or hiN authoris~d r~pre~~ntativ~ haa
9~t~ra~in~d t?-at th~ propo~~d proj~al. l~il~ aithin th• ~tinition o!
Cat~qoriaalr~xa ia~lin~~ ~ndsis, tt~~ •lor~a aateqorioaily~x~mp~tromllh~
Impaot R~po
r~qul.r~n-anti to pr~para •n EIR.
~~Ippi Coani~~ion~r Kinq o!l~r~d a nw~~~n, sacond~d by Caatni~~ion~r
H~ ~eco~am~riANto~t s~CityhCouacil~approval1ot Abandonrua~nt~Nio•~e2R11-~as
her~by r
r~oommsnd~d by th~ City 8nqineez.
~, l-el-NpC~NMENT 'NO. 82-611 - Mqu-est to abandon a public utility s~eenMnt !or
water facility purpo~~s acquir~d by the City o! 7-nah~im, loc~t~d on ih•
weet side o! Soloa-on Drive, south o! Sante Ana Canyon Roed.
~C"rION: Commiesloner King o!lared e motion, 0econdAd by Commiesioner
Herbst nnd M~TION CARRIED, thaL tho Anah~ovaliof AbandonmentNOSa82n611~aa
heraby reaommand to the City Council app
rec~mmended by the City Engineer.
ADJOURNMENTs ~tion,~eec4ndedubyhCozatnissioner Kin~g~and MOTIONrCARRIEDeYthet
the meeting be adjourned.
The meeting wna ~djourned at~' 5:05 p.m•
Respect~ully aubmitted,
~.~.~.~, ~° ~~~-
Edith T. Herris, Secretary
Anaheim City Plenning Commission
SLHslm