Minutes-PC 1983/03/07RECiIJLAR MESTING OF THE 1-N11~iEIM CITY PLANNINO COMMISSION
Rb~UL1-R Pffi1CTINa '1'he regular maa~ing ot tha Aneheim City Plar-ning Commission
was called to arder by Chairman Fry at 10:00 a~ru., March
7, 1983, in the Council Chnmber, a quorum beinq preaent and
tha Cotmnisaion rAViewed plane o! the items on todey'e
egenda.
RECE38: 11:30 e.m.
RECONVENE: 1:30 p.m.
PRESENT
ABSENT
Cheirman: Fry
Comn-issionere: Aouas, Huehare, Hnrbet, Kinq, Le Cleiz~,
McBurney
(Coumnisei.oner Buehore arrived at 2:05 p.tn. )
Comtaiasioners: None
AI,gp pFtEgENT Annikn Santalahti
Joel Fick
Jdck White
Jay Titus
Jey Tashiro
Dea~ Sherer
Edith Harris
Aesistant Director for Zoning
Aseisca~nt Director for Flanning
Aasiatant CitX Attarney
Oflice Enginear
Associate Planner
Asaociate Planner
Planninq Commiaeion 3ecretary
APPROVAI~ OF MINUTE3: Commiesionor King offered a ttwtion, seconc~ed by
Connnisaioner Hezbet and MOTION CARRIED (Commiseioner Auahore abeent), that the
minutes ~f the meeting of F'ebrunry 7, 1983, ba epproved ae corracted on Page
62 showinq Commiasioner McBurney abst~-ining and Coam-issioner Ld Clnire
seconding the mctiQn for continunnce ot Condition~+l Use Permit No. 2380.
ITEM NO. 1. BIR NEGATZVS DECLAR~TION
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 2380
:VER OF CODi: REQUIRSMENT AND
PUBLIC HEARING. OWNER: LEO FREEDMAN~ 468 S. RoxburY~ Heverly Hills, CA
90212. AGENT: CARL K1-R~CtiER ENTEI:PR18E8~ p•~• Sox 4349, Aneheim, C11 92803.
Property deecribed as an irregul+~rlysheped parcel ~f land consisting of
sppro~ia~ately 0.37 acre located at the southeaat corner of Freedman Way and
Harbor Houlevard, with approxia-ate frontaqes of. 135 feet on the Eouth aide of
Freedman Way and 100 feet on the east eide of Harbor Boulevard•
To germit a semi-enclosed tast-food restaurant with waivers of mi.nimum number
and type of parking spaces and minimum land8caped aetback.
Continued from November 29, December 13, 1982 and Janua.ry 24, and
February 7, 1983.
It was noted the petitioner has requested that subject petition be withdrawn.
ACTION: Commiesioner Herbet offered a motion, seconded by Coa~aiasioner La
Claire and MO'PION CARtu$D (Commissioner Bushore absent), t~at aubject petition
be withdrewn at ~he request of the petitioner•
83-129 3/7/83
~ , r ~
MINUTa6 71N1WEIM CITY PL1-NNIN(i COMMIBE'ON M11ACl1 7, 1983 H3-130
ITEM N0. 2. 8IR NEGIITIVS DECL7IW-TZON (pW~VIOUSLY 71~PROVEQ) TENT)1TZV8 lr1A8 OF
TAACT NO. 10674 (RaV18I0N NO. 1) AND R3 8T FOR J-PPROVAL OF RaMOVAI+ OF
PUSLIC HEARING. OWNSRAi ~-ERDE pROPERTI$S, 6125 E. I.ateyotte, Scott~dele,
l~rizone, 85251 anQ FRED STEVEtiBr 3180 FronC^ra, 11nah~im, C)1 928^6• roximat~l
described ae an irrsqularly-shap~d peresl o! land conaistinq ot app Y
6.25 acres loaated nt th~ westezly tern~inus o! Euaslyptu~ Dri.ve, epproximat~ly
980 Leet southea~terly o! tha cantexline o! t3snta Ana Canyon Mad anA north o!
Martclin Lane.
Ta eetablieh nn 11-loL, RB-HS-22,000(8C) Zane eubdivieion and requeet for
a,pproval oP removal o! apecimen tra~a.
Continund lrom the meeting o! February 23, 1983.
It wne noted the petitioner hed requested a two-week c4ntinuence.
ACTION: Comn~issianer Kinq offered e crotion, eecondsd by Conuaisaioner Bouae
~,nd TION CARRIBD (Co~ami~sioner Huahore nbaent), that coneideration ot the
efornmentioned matter be continued to the meeting of March 21, 1983.
ITEM NO. 3. EIR NJ:GATIVE QECLARATION ANA GENE~L PLAN AMENDM~t~1T NO. 183
PUBLIC HF.ARING. REQUESTED HYs CITY OF 11N1-HSIM, 200 S. Anaheikt Houlevard,
Anaheim, CA 92805. Property deecribed as approximetaly 2•6 ecrea located nt
tha westerly tercainus of Wtiite 3tar Avenue end boundad on the southweat by the
Riversidp (91) Freewey.
To conaider the incorporation ot the eolid waeta facility dasiqnation on the
Land Uae Element and to co,~sider designating eubject property ns e
recycling/reeourcea r.ecovery tacility.
There was no one indicatinq their preaence in opposition to eubject requeet
end although the ataft report was not read, it is raterred to and made a part
of the minutea.
Jay Tashiro, l~seociate Planner, pxeaented the ataff report and explained thia
is a City-initinted Ge!nerel Plan Amendment to amend the Land Uae Elan-ent of
the General Plan and to considez the incorporation of the solid waste facility
desiqnation which will include transfer station and disposal lac~lities and to
congider desiqnating e 2.6 acre ~arcel located at the westerly tenainua o!
White Star Avenue and Y,ounded on ~:he southwest by the Riveraide (91) Freeway
as a recycling/reaources recovery trnnsfer f.acility,
Mr. Tashiro explained effective January 1983, state law requirea that before
the 5tdte Solid Management eoard can conaider or iasue e penait foz e solid
waste lacility, the aite must be in contormance with the Solid Waste
Management Plan, and the aite must be deaiqnated on the City'a General Plan,
and adjacent land uaes muet be aompatible Mith the cIf epoeal facility•
Commi.eaioner La Claire aeked it thia facility wc~uld technically be ccnsidered
a eolid waste facility. Jay Tashiro reaponded the facility will ba a
MINUT38, J1N71HaIM CITY ?L1INNINf3 COMMISSZQN, M~1P~H ~, 1983 83-131
r~ayclinq/ra~ourc~• ~ran~ler t~cilityi however, ths cisneral Plan de~iqnetilon
•hould be ;olid watte lacility whioh wtyuld cover any athez leciliti~s thet may
Niah to coat~ into tha City. He explaiaad any other lacility would h~ve to
come betore tha Plsnning CoamileRion !or Rpproval~
Mr. Teahiro ~teted a lettar wa• r~caivwd lrom the N~~rth Strent Partn~rohip, e
proparty ow+~er in the are~, which indi catea thay heve prableme with patantial
tra!!ic congestion dnd •tated thoee concerne wera sddraeped when the oxiginal
conditional use permit wss discuesed i n peceenber~
ACTION s Commiasioner Le Claire o!ler~d a cnotion, eecond~d by Commisaionor
Kinq and MOTION CARRIEA (Commiseioner Huehore abeen~), that the 1~naheim City
Planning Commisoion has reviewed t;.e proponal t~ amend the Land Ue. Blemant o!
the Anaheim Gon~ral Plan to incorpornt~ the eolid waste lecility desiqnetion
dnd to consider deeiqnating the 2.6 acre parcel locatQd nt the vranterly
~ezc-inus of White Star Avenue bounded on the eoutitwest by the :tiveraide (91 )
Freeway ae a recycling/reeourcea trnns ter tacilityt and daes hereby approve
the Neqative Declaration from the requiremont to prepare en environmentel
impect report on the baaia that there ~+ould ba no aignificent irdividunl or
cumulative edverse environmental impect due to tho approvel of this Neqetive
Declaretion aince the 1lnaheim Genernl Plsn deeignetes the eubject property for
qe~-eral inrlustrial land uees comtncnaurate with the proposalt thnt no eenaitive
environmental impacts nre involved in the propoealr thnt the Initial Study
eubmitted by the petitioner indicntes no eiqnificant individual or cumulative
advez•se anvironmental impactar and tha t the Negarive Declazation
aubstdntie~ting the foreeJainq findings ia on file in the City ot Annheim
Planning Departaient.
Commiss~oner La Cl~sire offered Re~oluti~n No. PCA3-50 and n~aved for ita
passaqe and adoption that the Maheim City Planning Coma-ission does hereby
reconaaend ~o the City Council thet Exhibit A be approved for General Plan
llmendment No. ls3 to incorporate the aolid vraske facility designation on the
Anaheim General Plan and deaiqnate 2.6 ecres ae a recyclinq/resources recovery
transfer facility and to find thdt the proposed uee and aita er.e compatible
with the adjoining industrial lend use s and will not adversely affect the
qrowth and dovelopa~ent of the area in which tha proposed ~acility will be
located.
On roll call, the foregoing resolution wae paseed by the followinq votei
AXES: BOU113, PRY, HERB$T, KING, LA CLAIRE, MC BURNEY
NOES : NOR~IE
ABSENT : EUSHOIZE
Jeck White, Asaistant City Attoxney, explained this ~eneral Plan Aarendmenk
will auton-aticelly be heard by the City Cauncil and that the letter recaived
in opposition will become part of the record.
MI1~iUTEB, 11t'1AHEIl~I CITY Pf~1NNING COI~illI88i0N_~ MAt~:H 7, 1983 _ 83-13Z
ITl~M Nd. 4. EIR N8f31-TIVt DI~CI.ARIITION (PREVIOUBLY APPRO~VBD) AI~IA CONDITIONAL
U~E PERMIT N0. Z207 (R~110VERTI8E0)
PUBLIC HEIIRING. OWNSRB: OMNGE COUNTY Wl-T8R QISTRTCT, A.O. Hox 83Q0,
~'ounte-in Vall~y, C11 91708. 11ti1~NTs 88N 9• OAY, 17300 Mi~rde S*.reet, Yorba
Lind~, CA 92686 , Property d~ocribed as an irregulsrly-sheped parc~l aP land
consietinq ot approximately 3.6 ecree havinq a frontaq~ o! approximately 120
faat on th. wesL •ide ot Rich~leld Roed epproximataly 1750 faet south o! the
centerline of La Pnla-a Avanue.
To ataend Condition No. 4 of Planning Coam~iosion Reeolution No. PC81-115
p~rteininq ta permittsd truck types and loads per dsy.
There wae no one indicating their praoence in oppo4ition to subject requast
and elthauqh the atslf repart was not rend, it ie reterred to and msde a part
of the minutes _
Ben Day, Blaire Paving, 4071 S. I.a PaLnn Avenue, Aneheim, atated they wiah to
eatablish a portable aephnlt plant and will be a~anufacturinq and recyclinq
esphalt products. He stated they feal this ie n~i exc~allent location beceuse
of ita cloae p=oximit.y to the recyclad materials directly ndjecent to this
pzvperty and it in cloae ta thA metropolitan erea wl~ere ther4 is a lot af
pavement recov~ry gc~ing on which will provide a aavir-qs to the City nnd to
developere. He stated thie plant hee the latest state o! the ~rt tentures for
good air quality ard has tha qreateet efticiency to ~zoduce quality producte.
He explained they have ta qo throuqh a permit pzocess with the South Coast Air
Quality Board and they ehould be heariny froa~ them in 11pri1 and their
requiremente are atrinqent, but believa this plant aill meet those
requirements. He stated the pravioua conditionel u~se pecmit wes lairly
conservative in the number of trucks per day and they feel they will need
additional trucks ~
THE PUBLIC HE~IiING WAS C1A3ED.
Mr. Day ciari~ied they ere not usinq the property for this uee at this tiawt
however, the adjacent property la beinq used for aaphalt and concrete
recycling fox road base material8.
Comm~iasioner La Claire atated Conditional Use Permit No. 2207 was approved far
thir~ pzope+rty . Mr. D+~y explained that permit wae tor a portable concrete
batch plant, but it wes never constructed and the leese lapsed and he hes e
ne~w leaee arranqement with the water district.
Commiaeioner I,a Claire eeked why this was not advextiaed as a new pern-it with
Conditional i3ae Permit No. 2207 beinq termina~t~d. Dean Sherer explained the
Code doee not really distinguieh between the tw~ uaes end etnff Pelt it could
be lound to be i~ contormance with Conditional Uee parmit No. 2207 and the
conditione cavld be modified to help this operation.
Jack White, ~iasistant City ~-ttorney, etate~ epproval of thia xequeet to permit
8 trucka would satiafy the requirements of Condition No. 6 which provide? thet
any additianal trucks et~all be subject to revtew and approval by the Planninq
Commiesion at th~ requo~~ o! the petitioner.
1lINUT38, ~NAHSIM CITY pI.y1NNZNG COMM288ZON, W-AGI 7, 1983 83-133
Commi~sion~r La Cl~ire clerili~d th~t i! thi• i~ ~pproved, the petition~r
vrc~uld be p~rmitted a aoncret~ batching pl.~nt in •ddition r.o eh• aaphalt, with
Mr. Day clarilyinq thsy ju~t want to have •~phalt in~t~ed of oon cr~t~.
Jeck Nhita stated the Planninq Ccma~iselon could dslst• C,on•iitlon No. 6 which
provids• that on~ portabla betch lacility shall bs permittced~
2t was notad e negative declaration was previourly epprovsd in conjunction
with Conditi~nal Use Permit No. 2207.
11CTION: Coma-iseloner ICing o!ler~d Reaolution Na. PC83-51 ar,d awvad for its
passaqe and adoptian that the Anahsim City Planning Commission doea heraby
amend Resolution No~ PC82-115 tu nllow eiqht trucke with a m,~xiiaum ot six
laada per dsy each to parmit a portable esphal~ plant subj~c~~.to the
conditions previouely approved, except doleting Condition No, 6 and emending
Condition No. 4.
On roll cnll, ttie f~reqaing reeolution wee pessed by the foll~~wing vote:
l1YSS t BOUAB, FRY, NfiR88T, KING, L11 Q.J-IRE, MC BURN~X
NOEBs NONE
ABSENTt BU3HORE
Jack White, 7-ssiatant City 1-ttorney, pre~tented the writtan riql!t to eppeal the
Planning Ccmmieslon's decision aithin 22 day• to the City Counc il.
ITSM N0. 5. EIR NEGI-TIVE Q£CI.~RIITION AND RECLA3SIFICIITION N0. 92-~ 83!_24
PUBI..IC H~A1tING. INTTIATBD BY: CITY OF ANl-HEIM, 200 S. Anaheim Boulevard,
l+naheim, CA 92805. Property described as app~oximately 1Q ecre ~ located east
of the Ordnqe (5") Freewey end north of Iand includinq) the Sout.hern Pacitic
Itailroed right-ot-wny.
County of Orange 1- 1 to RS-A-43,000.
There wae no orie indlcatinq their presence in opposition to sub ject request
and althouqh the stetf report wes not zead, it is referred tn and made a part
of the minutes.
Dean Sherer, Aaeociete Planner, presented the ataff report to the Planninq
Commieaion noting the City of l~naheim is requesting thia reclass^.ficetiou due
to annexation.
TH~ Pt1gLIC NEIIRING WAS CL08ED.
Coa~niseioner McBurney asked i! ttiere are any siqns currently on this
praperty. ~nnika 8antalahti, Assistant Dire~tor for Zoning, stat:ad she did
not beliave there are eny aigns on the property nt the preaent t~.me and that
GLTR11N8 requires that any billboarda alanq the freeway have to be in an
industr~~nl aone~ howavar, ehe }~eliavae there is a proposal for a billboxrd on
t,he railroad right-ot-vray on tha •outhern boundary.
Mli~i[JTR8LAN112~82M CITY PLJ1liNIN~i COMl~tI88I0N, lRAACH 7, 1983 83-134
Jack White, As~istant City Attorn~y, ~t~ted Condition No. 1 should b~ del~t~d
since the annexntion waa canplet~d la~t July.
~-CTI~Ni Commiosian~r 1Cing o!ler~d a aation, ~~conded by Codmissioner Harbat
and MOTZOIi G-RRLaD (Commissioner Hush~re absmnt), that the 11nAh~im City
Planninq Comn~i~~ion haa raviaw~~ a propo~al to r~clatsify ~ubjact property
lran the County o! Orenge 7-1 (aenezel, J-qricultur~l? to RS-71-43,000
(ReeidentiAl, Aqricultursl) 2ona on an irregularly-shap~d p~rcel o! land
coneiatinq o! approximetely 10 ncrer locatod a~st o! the Orange (57) Freeway
to north o~ (~+nd includinq) the Southarn pacitic Rnilroad riqht-ol-way~ and
doeu hern~by approve the Neqative Declaretion lrom ths raquirament to pre~ere
an environmsntal impact reporti on th• beeie thst th~re would be no signiticant
individual ar cumulntive adverse enviroruaental imp+-at due ~o the epproval o!
thie Negativ~ Dscleration einca the l~nnhnim General Plen des.iqnates the
eubject propertiy tor qaneral induetri.al land usee comeaensurate with the
propoealt thet no sensitiva environmental impacta are involved in the
propoaal~ thet the initial Study eubmitted by the petitioner indieatas no
aiqniticant individual or cumulative ndvarse environc~ental iapact~r and that
the Neqative Doclaretion eubatantiatinq the loreqoiny lindinqs is on file in
the City of Anehaim Planninq Departs~ent.
Commissioner Kiny of~ered Resolution No. PC83-52 nnd moverl for ite pa~seeqe end
arloption that the Anaheim City planning Cocaniesior doee heraby qrant
Realaseificatian No. 82-83-24 unconditionally.
On roll call, the foragoinq reeoluti~n wes pessed by Lne following vote;
AYES: BOUAS, FRY, HERB3T, KING, LA CLAIi2E, M(' BURi~IEY
N08S: NONE
A88ENT: SUSHORE
IZ'~M NO. 6. EIR NEGJ~TIVE DECLAMTION AND RECI.~ISSIFICATION NO. 82-83-25
PUBLIC HEARING. INITIATED BY: CITY OF ANAHEZM, 200 3. Anaheim Boulevard,
Anaheim, C1- 92805. Property deecribad ss apps~aximately 10 acree located east
of the Oranqe (57) Freeway and north of (and including) the Southern Pacific
Railroad right-of-way.
County of Orange A1 to Mi..
There was no one i.ndicatinq their presence in opposition to subject request
and althouqh the ataff report was not read, it is reterred to and made a part
of the m.inutee.
Denn Sherer, Associate Flanner, explPxned this is the snme property as
diacussed in No. 5 and this reclaesif.ication is to the Industrial, Limited
Zone.
Z4IE PU$I+IC HEIIRING WAS CLOSSD.
ACTION: Comoaissioner Kinq offered a motion, seconded by Commaiaeioner Bouas
and MOTION Cl1RRI~D (Comsaiesicner aushore absent?, ~3t khe P-naheim City
Ple~nninq Comaaiasion has reviewad ttse proposal to reclassity subject property
83-135
MIpUT3g, Ati)1}13IM CITY PI.1-NF12NG COM~MQ88ION W11iiCli 7. 1983
~xom th• County o! Orsnq~ A1 (a~n~ral, J-qricultural) to M. (indu~trial,
Lieai.tad) Zon• an irreg:+i~rly-sheprd paresl o! lan~! consistinq o! ~pproximet~ly
10 acr~a l~aa~ted e~it o! th~ Oranqa (57) Freaway end north o! (~n~V•i~h:udinql
the Southarn Pacific 'tailroad right-ol-~+ayt snd doe~ h~r~by app
N~rqativ Daal~r+~tion lrom th~ r~quirem~nt to prep~r• an onvironarntal ~a~sct
report on the basis that thera vrould ba no rignificant lndividusl or
cumulative adveras •nvironmental impact du~ to the approval o! thi• Negative
Dscleration since the ~-naheim Gen~ral Plan deaiqnat~s the subjact property !or
q~neral indu~trial lanc! useo commaneurete with th' proposalt that no sensitiva
anvironmantal impacts ara involved in th• propo~alr thet the Initial 9tudy
submittad by the patitioner indicate. no signiticant indivldual or cumulative
adversa environmentel impact4t and that the Negative Daclsration
~ubstentiating the lar~qoinq findings is on lile in tha City of l1r-aheim
Planninq Depertment.
Conm~iaeioner King offered Re~solution No. PC83-53 and moved !or its pnseaqe snd
adoption that the 1-nahei.m City Planninq Connaission doe~ hereby grant
Reclassilication Na. 82-83-25 aubject to InterdepartmentAl Cammitte•
recommendations.
On roll cell, the foregoinq resolution wae passed by the follrn~-inq vote:
AY~3: BOUAB. FAY, HBRBST - IUNG, LA CLl1IRE. MC EURNEY
NOESs NONE
AHSl~1T s BUBHORB
IZ'EM N0. 7. EIR NEGATIVE DSCLARJITION AND CONDZTIONAL qSS PBRKIT N0. 2420
Sox 49414, Loe
PUBLIC HEARING. OWNERSt NORtMN i~ IRMJ- M. 3T'1ZTZERr P.O,
Anqelea, CA 90049. AGBNTs SRIC HEI.I+A.E• 1281 N. lcraemer, ]-naheim, CA 92806.
Property described aa e rectanqularly-shepad parcel of land coneistinq o!
approximately 0.5 acre located et 1281 N. Krneeaer 8oulaverd (Tire's Warahouse,
Inc.)
To retain retail ti.re salee in the ML ?,one.
There was no one f.ndicatinq their preeence in oppoeition to subject request
and althouqh the sta~f report wae not read, it is reterred to and au~de a part
o! the a~inutes.
Eric Helmle. President, Tire's Warehouee, 1281 N. Kraemer. Anahaim, e~cplained
no ehanqes nra pr~posed and they have been operetinq thia businese at this
site for four yearst that they took the site over from another tire caapnnY
nnd now underatand that a canditional use permit is required. He pre~anted
letters from three neighbora indicating they favored ttae project and atated he
has received phone cella from other neiqhbors who indicated they would be
aillinq to aupport the requeet, if neceeaary.
THS PUffi.IC HSARING ~i3 CLOSBD.
R,espondinq to Commieaioner La Claire, Mr. Helmle explained they recaived a
Notice ot Violation in Novamber of 1982, and it t~ook thie lonq to file tihe
sppllcation tincs the ovmer was out of town and tliare Md/ a problem obtaininq
all the neeeasary intormation•
~,
MINUTIlB~ AN1-HEIN CITY PLI1NNIt+K'i CC~WI86ION W-fC11 7 1983 83-136
Com~aisaioner La Cl~ir• clarifi~d that 25~ o! the buiin~~r i~ rstail an3 Mr.
Helml. stipulaeed that rstail aales would navet exce~d 25t.
l1CTIONc Cnmmission~r La Clair~ o!ler~d a mution, ~eoonded by Commi.~~ion~:
ICi q end MOT20N CI-RRIED (Commi~~ioner Sushore eb~ent), thnt the 7-nsheim Cfty
Planning Coa~iasion h~s raviaw~d ths propo~al to r~tein r~teil tire •ales in
the [+Q. (Industrial, Limited) Zone on a ractenqularly-s hape d parce l o! l a n d
conei~tinq o! dpproximatmly 0.5 ocre havinq a lrontape o! approximately 145
feet on tha west sida o! Krsemer Baulevard approximately 185 lset ~outh ~! the
centarline o! Miralotne 1lvenue end lurth~r d~scsibed as 1281 N. Kraamar~ and
doea hareby epprove the Negative Declarstion tram the requirem.nt to pr•para
an environmental impact rapc~rt on khs baai• thnL there would be no eiqniticant
individuel or cumulative adve~rse environmental impact due to th• epproval af
this Neqative Decleration sinca tha ~-nahoim tienar+~l Plan deeignatee the
aubject proFerty for gener~l induetrial lend uaea comm.neurate with the
proposalt that no seneitiva environmu~ntal iapects are involved in the
propoealt that the Initiel Study ouhe~itted hy the petitioner in8lcates no
signiticent individual or cumulative edverse •nvironn-antal impactaJ and that
the Neqative Declaration substantiating the loreqoing lindinga is on file in
the City of Anaheim Planning Department.
Commiseioner La Claize affered Reeolution No. PC83-54 And moved for its
passaqa and adoption thnt tha ~-naheim City Planninq Cuaaaiasion doea hereby
grant Conditional Uae Pera-it No. 2420 subject to the petitioner'a stipulation
that retail aalee ehall be limited to 25• ot the totel ea~1e~ volum~ and
subject to Interdepartaiental Committee recommAndations.
On roll call, the foregoinq resolution wes ~aesed by the following vote:
AYRS: BOUAS, FRY, HERHST, KING, LA CI.AIR6, MC HURNEY
NOES: NONE
ABSEN'r: HUSNOR~
ITBM 1~10. 8. EIR NEGATIVE DECLARATION J-A1D C'ONDITIONI~-I. USE PBRMIT NO. 2422
PUBLIC HBARING. OWNER: MARIE B• PL+'I+i+$TIER. 3311 Devon Circle~ ~~n9024pon
Beach, CA 93649. ~Gffi~]T: N.B. FAY D.C., P.O. Box 1340, Downey,
Property deecribed as a rectanquldrly-shaped pnrcel o! land consistinq of
approximately 6000 square leet located at 126 Narth Brookhurst Street.
To permit medica]. office use of a residential structure.
There wae no one indicetinq their presence in oppoaition to aubject requeet
end although the staff report wa8 not read, it is rnlerred to nnd mnde a part
of the minutea.
Dr. Norman Fay atated he is li~ensed to practice chiropractic in Anaheim at
130 N. Brookhurst and this proposal ie to use the property next door (126 N.
Brookhuret) as medical oflicee.
TliB PUBLIC HBARING WAS CLOSED.
MINUT~B. 1-I~111NEIM CITY PL~A1ti~t+Ki CONMI88ION, M~ACFI 7, 1983 83-137
R~~pondinq to Coma~i~~lon~r 8ouar, Dr. F~y clariti~d h• wiil livs o~n ths
premia~g end Will be open l:rom 8t00 a.m. tio tnidniqht, 7 dayt a w~~k, bec~u~e
hs •ervo• a• a supervi~or ~~~! the lacilities n•xt door and in order to abid~ by
the letter o! the law, he should ba availAble th~ hour~ they sre op~n.
R~o~+onding to Cot~aio~ioner Souas, Dr. Fay steted he live~ in Downey and has
been retired but now prartiaas at 130 N. Br~okhurat. He stated he realiasa
the houre lrom 8:00 a.m• to 12 midniqht see~m to be axtanded hours, but th~ra
te not that much sctivity and he muat ba sveilnble during their business hours.
Co~m-iaaioner King cleri~ied that a 10-foot landacapad aree will ba provided
end that the two drivewaya w~ll be cloned.
Responding to c'hairman Fry, pr. Fay e~xpleinad he eup~rviaee the operntion at
130 N. Braakhuret which is the Roman Spa dnd Maseeqe and t1:e at~orney'a o!lice
requeeta thet e lic~nsed phyaician aithnr ba in attandance or write
prescriptione tor people using thAt facility sr~d that his whole reason for
applyinq for thin usage at 126 N• Srookhuret is to awko himsel! availnble to
tha epn and explained the ape has been ~.n operetion for nixteen yaars.
Cheirmen Fry etated he would have a problem approvinq this request with thaee
hours of operation nnd asked how the property will be chanqed on the interior
at 126 N. 8rookhuret. Dr. Fey explained two non-be+aring pertitioned wa11e
will be constructed to raake a small waitinq room and c!irectly behind that will
be an 8 foot by 8 Poot file and reception area end at the other end of the
waiting room will be a hellway to the consulting roor~ or tzeatment room t+nd
the reet o! the houae is edequate for a therapy ro~m, examination area and a
bathroom. He explained there is a bedroan and kitcl~en which will be pert of
hie living quarters and thet the qarage will be converted to a qymnaaiwn. He
atated many doctors arc qettinq by without a nurse todey and he ie just
building his practice and ~ to 5 pationts s day wi.~.l be all he can handle.
Dr. Fay reeponded to Coan~nieaionsr Bouas that he ttas bean asaociated with the
spn aince December 21, 1982. He atated the law requires that e phyeician be
aupervising the treatment or write preacriptionr, eo he will either be there
phyaicnlly or write e prescription. He stated r:he apa servicee uare thnn five
persone per day.
Jeck Whlte, Assistant City Attorney, asked if the petitioner plans to have a
prfvate practice independent of the Roman Spa. Dr. Fay reaponded he applied
for a practice and to supervise the apa and his private practice will be at
126 N. Braokhuret, so he will need ta apply for e aew license at that location.
Jack White aecertained that independent oi whnt is done in reletionehip to thd
re~erral of clients co the Itoman Spa or the referral of cliente to him, this
pern-it vrill etill be needed 2aecause the petitioner intends to have a private
practiae at 126 N. Broolchuret.
Dr. Fay atated he will have his private practice at 12b N. Brookhurst and that
r+uuld be eeparate from tha gpa, but he vrould atill fulfill his requirements at
130 N. Srookhuret for the spa.
MIt1UTE8, 11N71HEIN CITY PLJ1NNIt~i COMMI88Idti, W1R~H 7 r 1903 83-138
Dr. Pay explain~d h• i~ lea~inq th~ p~ope-rty et ].Z6 N. 8rookhur~t on ht~ ~wn
and it dooe not hir~qe on ths Romen 8pa and he would still •tay in busins~s
sven i! the ~pa wao not th~re an~ i! h~ did nok hav~ thair r~lerral~.
Ra~ponding to Coam~issioner eoue., Dr. F~y •tat~d ha h~o an agreataent with the
praperty ovm~r n~xt door ~or scc~s• purpoaes ~and thny will have an •a~ec-ent
drer+n up to aatistnction ot that raquir~+ment.
Coam~is~ianer BuEhore errived at 2~05 p.m.
Jack White stated e recordmd eanamant would qo wi~.h the propezty anQ tha
•ubeaquant purchdser of the property or laseee of tha property would be on
constructive notice nt that ensement and ~t wou~rt not b~ etfected by any
change in tenancy ar oane,r~hip.
Cheirman Fry atnted if this is appr~ved, there arill probal~ly be a rec~uirement
that there be no doore on the treah.mant or axamination rooma end that the
doore be replecod with curtaina.
ACTIONi Commisxionr-v Herbet offered A motion, secondod by Comn-issioner King
end MOTION CARR]:~fi, r.hat tha ~nahei~ City Plenning Coa~c-ission hee reviewed th~
proposel to perms~: ~ice1 office use oP a residentiAl etructure on a
rectnnqularly-s~= pircel of 'snd cansiating af approxic~ately 6,000 equsre
f~et heving e L`~{a=~~ ~f. approximately 69 leet on the east aide of Brookhurst
8treet and fur-tr-•«~. d~rsi~ed es 126 N. Brookhurst Streett and doea hereby
approve the ti~~.- ve ~scs~azation from the zequirement to prepare an
enviroruaemtT.y'. ''~~t ^~qvort on the baais thnt there would be no e.iqniticant
individual ~~r 4=~+=~F~`l~v~e adverse environmental lmpact due to the epproval of
this Negat..v~ '~;-iw•~tion since the Aneheim General Plan deaiqnatea the
subject prc~='~- ~~~ g~neral comaaercial land uses commenaurdte with the
proposal ; Ch~c- rrc ~nsitive environenentdl impscts nre involved in the
proposel; e~c r!ne ~`nitiel 8tudy eu~nitted by the petitioner indicates no
siqnificant ~~i=vudl~al or cumuletive edveree environmental impactsr nnd that
the t~egati~ ~~-~z'ation aubstsntiating fhe loreqoinq fi.ndings is on f11e in
the City of ~~m Planning Department.
CommiRS:toner~~r~st offered Resolutian No. PC83-55 and moved for ite passage
and ad~+tiw- t#+~t the Annheim City Plaru~inq Commieaio~t does hnreby qrant
Conditio~l ~r ~ermit No. 2422 for a period of two years to expire March 7,
1984, ad~~sct ~o the petitioner'e atipulntion thsre will be no dours on the
•xamina~tion ar trea ment rooms and subject to Interdepartmental Caaoaittee
recomuiss~ ioe s .
O~ roll cail, the foreqoiag reeolution was paeaed by the followinq vote:
lk'~'aS: FR]i, HSRBBT, I.A CI+AIRE. I~4C BURNEY
lIOBS,: BOUAS, BU3HORE, KING
1188~ : NO~IE
Item Nos. 9, 10, 11 anc] 12 were considered et the beqinning of the meetinq.
MINUT88. 11N1-HtIM CI'PY PLIINNINO COMMI88ION, MA~CH 7, 1983 __ 83-139
ITSM N0. 9. EIR N~fi11TIV$ b8C1J1R1~TI0N l1ND OONDITIONI-L USE pERMIT NO. 2410
pUBLIC HE7IRING~ OM1NERi ROSERT L. ZtJ1CERMi1N, 225 S1 Gamino Driv~, B~v~rly
Hill~, CA 90212. 11(iaNTt 11TI.ANTIC RIC1iFIbI,D CO!'I?11NY, I-TTENTIONi C.V. HICK3,
300 W. (ilanoake 81vd., Clendala, G 91202. Praperty d~~cribed as a
rectanqularly-sh4p~d p+-rcal of l+~nd aansisting o! approximately 0.46 ecre
locetad st 610 S. Magnolia Avenua (11rco MPi~G).
To retain convenlence se~es in an exi~ring service stati~n.
ACTION: Commiseloner ~3ouas olfered a nation, seconded by Coaunissioner
La Claire nnd MO'i'ION CARRIBU (Commis0lonar Buehore sbsont), that consideration
o! the alorea-entioned a-atter bs continuod to Lhe reqularly-echeduled maeting
ot ~pril 4, 1983, at the request o~ the petitioner.
7TEM N0. 10. EIR N~GIITIVE DBC2.11RATION 71NA CONDITIONAL USE PE1i!!I'~ N0. 2411
PUBLIC HSARING. OWNBRSs 1~RTHUR 8• WZLMSR~1 TRU3'P HANK OF 11I~RICA, P.O. Box
7980, Newport Baach, CA 92660, AT'PNi P?1UL POpNM-~4R. Trust O!licsr. AGENTs
ATLANTIC RICHFIEI.D C0.• ATTNis C.V. HICKS- 300 W. Glenoaka Blvd., Glendale,
CA 91202. Propetty deacribed as a rer,tangularly-ahaped parcel of land
coneistiny oi ~pproxinietely 0.50 acre located at 1000 N. State Colleqe
Boulevard (Arco MP&G).
To retein convgniencp reteil sales in dn exiatinq service station.
ACTIONs Commissioner Bouea otfered a motion, secondad by Cunanissioner
I.~ a aCl ire and MOTION CARRIED (Coma-iseioner Bushore ebsent), that consideretion
af the alorementioned mettez be continued to the reqularly-acheduled meetinq
of April 4, 1983, at the rec~uest of the petitioner.
ITSM NO. ].1. EIR NEGATIVL DH~CLARATION ANU CONDITIONAL U9E FEPMIT NO. 2412
PUSLIC HEARZNG. OWNSRS: ~-TLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPI~NY, 300 W. Glenoaka Blvd.,
Glendale, CA 91202. Property deecribed as e rectanqularly-shaped parael of
land aonsisting of approximately 0.37 acre loca~ted nt 1700 Weet La Palmei
Avenue (Arco MP6G).
To retain convenience ret+~il gales in an exiatinq aervice atation.
ACr TION: Commiseioner Houes affered a mo~i~n, aeconded by Conaaissianer
La Claire and MOTION CARR.IED (Coam-isaionar Bushore absent), that conaideration
of the atoretaentioned matter be continued to the reqularly-ncheduled meetinq
o! April 4, 1983, at the requeet of the petitioner.
ITBM N0. 12. 8ZR NEGl-TIVB D6CI.ARATION~ WAIVBR OP CQOB RBQ~7IRBM8NT l1ND
COND TII ONlu. USE PRRMIT N0. 2413
PUHI.IC HEA~tING. OF1NERS: l~TI~NTIC R~CHpIELD COMPHNY, 3U0 W. Glenoaks Hlvd.,
Glendale, G 91202. Property de-ecribed as an irrequ].arly-shaped parcel of
land consisting of approximately 0.51 acre located at 3901 E. Rivardale Avenue
(Arco MP&G).
MIN~1'PEB. AN)1HEIM CITX PL~NNINfi COMMIB$IONr MAftCH 7, 1983 8„~0
To r~tain a conv~ni~noa mark~t at an ~xi~ting qa~olin~ ~~rvic• otation with
waiv~r o! type o! light~r box •iqns.
1-CTION s Coa~altsionar Bouas o!l~red a motion, •~cond~d by Comaalasioner
La Cl~ire and MOTION C11RRiSD (Comtaission~r Bu~hore ab~ent), that conridaration
o! the alor~tnsntionsd matt~r b~ aontiinuad to th~ rsgularly-achaduled msatinq
o! 11pri1 4, 1963, at the rsquest o~ the petitioner.
Concarning Itam Nos. 9, 10, 11 snd 12, Commi~eioner H~rbat aaked that the
daecxiption o~ th4 ua~s be clerified and not called convenience markets. Jeck
White suqqeetad the dat~cription reads "to retain Pood and buvexage di~psn~era
at an exi~ting qa~olin~ service etetion". Doan Sherer ateked thaea lacilitiae
will be diopansing lood and bevaraqes other than throuqh vendinq machinea and
they will have individual relriqeratars and erll lrom behind the countero.
It waa noted s similar operation was e-pproved at flarbo.r and 1(atslla !or
machines only.
Commiaeioner La Cleite atated she thaught tne description wae misleadinq since
it xtatAS the requeet wea to retain a uae and they have never had the use
npproved in the Pirut plece. Dean Sherer replied ataf.f would try to caae up
with a better description of the use.
Jeck White exglained in the peat when a use we~ existi.nq, eteff has indicatad
in the de~cription to retain rather than to periait, even though tha use would
be there illeqally nnd pointed out other itema ~n the aqenda whiCh nre to
retain a use. He stated he would have no problem in establishing e naw
practice if that ia what the Planning Coa~miseion deaires. He stated sometin-ea
i! the descriptton says to eetablieh e~nd the use ie alreedy there, tha public
qeta confused ae to what is qoinq on.
It was the qeneral conseneue thet eteff would try to come up with a better wxy
to deecribe uses established.
ITBM NO. 13. fiIR NEGATiVE DECI~ARATION, WAIVER Ot~ CODE REQUIREMENT AND
CONDTTIONAL USE PBRMIT NO. 2a21
P~BLIC NEARING. OWNERSs FAR WBST SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION, 4001 Mac Arthur
elvd., Newp~ort Beach, C~- 92660. Property deecribed ae an irreqularly-shaped
parcel of land consiatinq of approximately 1'2.2 aczea located at 5417 E. La
Pelma Avenue (Nautilus Plua Health Spa).
To permit a health epa in the MII.(3C) Zone wiCh waiver o! minimum number ot
parking spaces.
There was no one indicating their presence in opposition to subject request
and although the ataff repart wa~ not read, it is referred to and made a pnrt
of the minutea.
Jerry Douderman, President of 8outhern California Nautilus Fitness Centeza,
Inc., 19732 M~sc Arthur Boulevard, Irvine, explained they hnve fi•fe fitnese
centers in Orsnge County and seven in Los Anqeles and San Bernardino
~ .»
.'
83-141
MINUTEB, 11N7-liSIM CITY PL1-t~it~llNG COMMI88ION,~ ~~ 1983
Countie~. Hs statad the o~nt~r• y~nsraily includs naubilue equipm~nt,
oomputarisad bicycla~, and aerobic danainq• Ha ~te-tad som~ o! tihe tecilitis~
hava physical th~rapy in conjunction with medioal doctor~, and rven thouqh
thnt is not planneQ !or this !e-citiLy at this tia-s, he would like to be abl~
to hava that ssrvice it thsra is an inter~stad doct~r.
THE PUBLIC H~ARING WAS CLOSED.
Commiesioner Herbet stated a tra!!ic report was subtn.itted in conjunction with
this request. Commiesionsr La Claire ntatsd it app~ara the tra!!ic is
basically in the ever-inqs with Mr. Uoudarmnit claritying the heaviest traftic
is at 6:00 e.m. t-~lors people go to work end atter 5e00 p.m•
ACTION: Coa~ais~ioner Herbst offered a a-otion, eeconded by Coa~miasioner Kinq
an MdlOTION CARRIED, that the Anahein- City Planninq Commis~ion has reviewad the
propoeal to permit a health epe in the ML(3C) (Industriel, Liaaited•Scenic
Corridor Overlay) Zone with waiver o! mir-in~um nwnba~ Xi~p~giini2A2°acrasn nn
irregulnrly-sheped parcal of land conaisting ot epp Y
h~ving e frontage nf approximately 500 feet on the north eide of La Pelaa
Avenue epproximately 2,020 feet weet of ttra centarline of Imporinl Highway and
further deacribod ea 5417 E. Le Palma Avenuei end doae hereby approve the
Negative Declaration trocn the requirement tu pregfare an snvironmenxal impaat
report on the br,sis that there would be no siqnificant individual or
cumulative adverse environmental impact due to the ~spproval of this Neqative
Declaration aince the Anaheim General Plan deaiqnaters the eubject property for
qeneral induetrial land usea commensurate with the pr~posalt thnt no sensitive
environa~entel inipacts are involved i.n the groposalr thr~t the initial Study
submitted by the petitioner indicates no siqnificant individual or cumulative
adverse enviro~uaental impectat and that the Neqstive Decleration
substantiating the foreqoi,iq findings is on file in the CitY o~ Anaheim
Planning Depertment.
Commissioner Aerbst offered a motion, seconded by Conmaiseioner Bouas and
MOTION CARRIED, that thc~ Anaheim City Planning Commiesion doas hezeby qrant
waiver of aode requirea-ent on the besis that the heaviest houra of use will be
in the early morninq and eveninq hours and on the basis thet the ~arkinq
waiver will not cause an increase in traf~ic conqeatian in the ~nanediate
vicinity nor advex8ely affect any ad~oininq land uaea end that the qrantinq o!
the parking variance under the conditiona iaposed, if any, will not be
detrin-ental to the peace, health, safety and general welfare of the citisens
of Anaheim.
Commissioner Herbst offered Resolution No. PC83-56 and a-oved for ita passag~!
and adoption that the Anaheim City Planninq Comn~ieaion does hereby grant
Conditional Uee Pezmit No. 2421 eubject to Interdepert,~-ental Committee
recoromendations.
On roll call, the foregoinq reeolution was paeBed by the following vote:
~Ygg: BpUAB. SUSHARE, FRY, k~ERSBT, KING, LA CLAIRE~ MC 9URNSY
NOEB: NONE
Aggg'NT : NONE
MINtIT$$ AN71MlIM CITX pLA1QNIN0 COl~OlI88ION M11RiCH 7 1983 03•142
ITEM N0. 14. SIR_CATEfiORIC1IL 1lX3MP't'ION-CL7-88 5 1-ND VARIl1I~iC8 NO. 3324
P~TBLIC HSl1RIN(i. OioNERB s 1CENNiTH J. 1-ND BHARON E. THIE8I+~YER, 412 8. Nu~w~od,
Anshaim, CA 92804. praperty de~crib~d aa a rectsnguZarly-shaprd parcal o~
land con~iating o! approximataly 6,'l74 ~quare leet loaated at 412 8. Nutwood
8tr~~t.
Waivar o! minimua~ tront yard eetback to conetruct a rooa- addition.
There was no ono indiaating their pr~aence in appc~s~tion to subject request
and althouqh the staf! report was not redd, it is r~larred to and mad4 e part
o! the minutas.
Kan Thiesmeyer, owner, wde ,rssent to anewar any questinns.
THE PUBLIC HEARING WA8 CLOSED.
Commiasioner King aeked Mr. Thieemeyer i.f he hed cantacted hie nei.qhbor to the
north. Mr. Thieen~eyer responded ha ha~d diecuased this with his neiqhbore and
they 11nd not qiven him any neqative reaction.
It was noted the Plnnninq Director or his authorized repreeentative has
determined ~hat the propose~: pz'oject fnlle within the definition o!
Cateqorical Exemptiona, Claes 5, es delineA in the S~ats Lnviranrnental Impact
Report Guidelines and is, therefore, cateqarically exen-pt from the requirement
to prepare an EIR.
ACTIONs Coaimissioner King offered Reaolution No. PC83-:57 and moved for its
passaqe and adoption that the Anaheim City ~lanninq C~oeunieaion dnes hereby
grartt Variance No. 3324 on the basis that denial would ~egrive subject
property froaa privileges enjoysd by nther propertiea in the eame zona and
vicinity, and subject to Interdepartmentsl Cammi*_tee recoan+endations.
Commi.Beioner Herbst asked thnt the lect the aubjeat praperty ie a reverae
corner lot be added to the resolution.
On roll call, the foreqoing resolution was paeead by the lollowing votes
AYE3: SOUAS, BU3HORF, FAY, HBRBST, 1CINGr LA CLAI~- ~"1C BURNEY
NOE.4: NONE
1~SSENT s NONE
ITEM NO. 15. EIR NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND VARIANCE NO. 3323
pUBLIC HF.ARING. OWNER: MAAGARET JOUGLI~.RD. 2500 W. Mnll Place, Anahetm, CA
92804. Property deacribed ae en irreqularly-,shaped ~arcel of la~nd coneistinq
of approximetely 6,185 square f~.,et located at 2500 W. Mall Plece.
Waivar o! minimwn number and type of parkinq specea to retain a qaraqe
conversion.
There was no ~ne indicating thair presence in oppogition to subject request
and althouqh the statf roport wss not read, it is relazx~ed to anci made a part
cg the minutes.
MINUT88. ANl1H8IM C2TY I+I.J1t~1'NING COMMI68ION, M~i 7, 1983 83-143
Marqaret Jouglard• ovmar, statod ~he wants ta use hcr qRraq~ as an o!lice !or
e swimnaing pool contractinq bu~in~E$ on a temporery baai~. Sh• stat~d she had
a oontraotior do soms Mork on ths hou~e, but now th~ garaqe door doeo not work
even thouqh tha hardware is still the•a end the contrector is the parson who
lil~d tha complaint. Sha etat~d sha would ha•~e to ~psnd quite a bit o! money
to have tha gsrsg~ door put baak into vroxk~nq ordar. She explained she do~.
not have paopls cominq into her otfica.
TFig pUBLIC HI~IIRING WA8 Q.088D.
Reepondi.nq to Coma-issioner Bouas, Mrs. Jouglard explain~d her tamily actually
has lout vehiclear but only thzae are kapt nt this reaidsnce and with the
extanded driveway, there is xoom !or three vehiclea.
Commie~ionar Herbst statsd there were a lot of vehiclea parked in lront oP
thie reeidence. Ma. Jouglard eteted the vehiclea probnbly balonqed to
viaitore.
Comn-issioner Herbst et+sted he could not vote for this variance becduse it was
constructad illeqally. He stnted Code requirea off-atreet parkinq with two
encloeed epaaes on each reaidential lot, but by violating the Code, the
parkinq hes probebly posed n problem for the neiqhbore. He etnted if the
petitioner wiahes to sell the residence, the garngg eauat be converted. tte
stated i! the Comoa.ission approved somethinq like this~avery property owner
would want the snme thing.
Ma. Jouqlard stated she eeked for thie on e temporary besie and referred to a
previoue hearing whero approval was qrented for two years. Conrniasioner
Herbst explained that was for a conditional uae penait nnd not e varinnce.
Com~aiasioner La Claire stated the variance is the problem si.nce it qoea with
the land and there ie a parking problem with a lot of vehicles in the area.
She explained conditionel use parmits can be revoked if there ie a problem,
but a variance cannot be revoked.
Jack Wtiite etated normally variances are granted qiving the xight to construct
a new etructure with waivers and quite clearly, it would be inappropriate to
cnnditior. it an e period o~ time, because once the time expired, the ettucture
would have to be renwved. He stated i! the Commisaion wiehes to clrau~t thia
variance on a temporery basis, he could gaghovide thatnafterhthecexpiration
recor~ed e•;ainst the property which would pr
date o! a certain per:od of t»me, the qarage would have tn be converted. He
axplained the covenant would qive notlce to any eubaequent owner, in case trQ
property chanqea hanris and thnt the riqht to utilize the garaqe !or this
purpose is of limited durntion.
Comonissioner Herbet stated the plr~na show that two walle have been conetructed
within che qarage• Jack White stated those would have to be removed it the
garage ssere to be utilized for parkinq again.
Ms. Jouqlard stnta~ i.t would be ditficult to canduct her bueinesa from her
hame if this ie denied becauae 2he qaraqe is hot in the sur~mer and cold in the
winter•
NINUT'!8, 7-td11EliIM CITY__PLMiNINO C011l11882C4i, W1ACl~ 7. 1983 8~-144
Cotnmis~ion~r Bu~hor~ ~G~t~d th~ ~nt~nt o! eh~ Hom~ Oooupation P~rmit i• th~t
th~r• v+ould b~ no p~opi~ ooa~iaq inta th~ hoa~ !or that bu~in~~• u~~. Nr.
Jougl~rd st~t~d ooaa~lonally a oust~om~r will oom~ th~r~, but normally th~y qo
to ~h• cuetom~r's hoaia.
Commis~ion~r Huihor~ a~c~rtained thet hvildiaq p~nait^ ar~ obtain~d !or any
work don~ by th~- p~titionar'e n+imminq pool ooaipany and •tat~d h~ did not
under~tand why th• petitiionsr did not havs ~he contr~ctor qat p~rtaits. Ms.
Jouqlard •tat~d •ha h~~ a liaens• !or NMiniminq poolo +~nd did not knovr ~bout
this r~quiremant.
Commi~sion~r Bu~hore statiad th~ only time th• Camaio~ion har evar approv~d
unythinq like this wss wF-en thers we• a handicapp~d perion involved ar.d th~y
had purches~d the property with the illeqal convezaion becau~e o! th~
handlcapped parson and it Qid hnv~ a condition that when th~ hous• aao sold,
the ge-r~qu would bt reconvdrtad. Ha •tatsd this would put an addttional
park:;~g burden on the neighbors and h~ cuuld not condon~ the aonvar~lon,
•specially aince thero ara all kinda o! garage convereione ell over the City
and th• ownera would all be wanting tha sam~ epprovel.
Cocmnieeioner Ln Cla~ire stated shs would not be opposad to grnntinq thi~ tor a
period ot ti~ne+.
Reepondinq to Coo~iaeioner Bouas, Ms. Jouglard atsted two yeara would be
ad~quate.
Commiseioner La Claire asked i! the petitionsr would try to have everyone park
in their three spacee o!! the streat which would less.n the impact on the area.
Ms. Jouqlerd steted she will talk to her vioitoro nnd noted there are quite a
!ew viaitors because there are ao many peaple livinq at the hou$e. She 4teted
~he hae not had any problem wi.th her naiqhbora.
1~CTION: Commiesioner La Claire ottered a aiotion, secondsd by C~a~is.ioner
McBurney and MOTION CARRIED (Co~mniasioner Bushore voting no), that ths ~nahein
City Plaaninq Commiseion has revierrod the pi~oposal to ratain a qazaqe
converaion with waivar of minimum nwot~er ot parking apaces on e
irreqularly-shaped parcel of land consiating o! approximataly 6,185 equsre
feet located at the eastarly terminus of Mall Placs and further described sa
2500 W. Mall Placet and doee heraby approve th~ Negativa Declaration trom tha
requirement to prapare an environmental impact raport on tha basis that there
would be no eigniticant individusl or cu~lati~•s adverse environmental impact
due to the approval of this Neqative Daclaratioa einr.e the 1~naheim Genera~l
Plan desiqnates the subjact property tor low deneity rasidential land uses
caoa~~naurete aith the prnposalt thst no aenaitive anvirocunantal impacts dre
involved in the proposalt that the Initial Study submitted by the pet~tione.
indicates na eiqniticant individua]. or cumiulativa advere~ environmental
impactas and that the Neqative Daclaration ~ubstantiating the for~going
findinqa is on lile i.a the City of 1lnaheim Planning Dapartment.
Commiseloner La Claire oftared Reaolution No. PC83-58 and maved tor its
paaeaqe and adoption thst th~ Anahaim City Planniaq Caaamission does hareby
qrant Variance No. 3323 !or a period of t~+o yeara on ths basis of thi ~1I111r~1d1
NII~IU'1'E8, J1N11E1iIM CITY pL7-~NINO COl~D~288ION, M1111Cli 7• 1963 83-1~4
Comacnio~ion~r Huahor• ae,at~d th~ int~nt o! th~ tiom~ Ovaupatian P~ra~.tt i• that
th~r~ vrould be no p~opl• cominq iato th~ haaa !or that bu~in~~~ ua~. M~.
Jouql~rd stat~d oocaalona lly a vustan~r will com~ there, but norn~ lly th~y 90
to th~ au~taa~r' ~ haaa~.
C~mmis~ionor euthor• aac~rtein~d that building paraiit• ar~ obtain~d !or any
vrork don~ by ~h• p~titiossez'~ ~v-imminq pool company e~nd •tatad ha did not
und~rstand why the petit ion~r diQ not hsvs the contraotor get p~rmit~. Ms.
Jouqlard stat~d •he has a lio~ns• !or ~Minminq pools and did no~ knov+ about
this r~quiremant.
Coma~is~ioner 8uihora ~ta t~d xhe only tima the Coaimis~ion hes ever approv~d
anythinq like this ~+e~ w"rien th~re wa~ a handicapped peraon involved and they
had purchaeed the property with tha illaqal convarsion becauss o! the
hanciicappad per~on and i t did have a condition that whon tha house was •old,
Che qarage would be reconvertad. H~ statad thie vrould put an additional
parking burdan on the ne iqhbors and he could not condone the aonver~ion,
•opecially sinae ~here are all kinds o! garaqe conversions all over the City
and the owners vrould all be wanting the satae approval.
Coma~issioner Ls Claire steted ehe v+ould not be opposed to qrentinq this !or a
p~riod o! tira~.
Reapondinq to Commissioner Bouas, Mo. Jauqlard skated two yeara would be
adequate.
Commis.loner L~a Clei:~e a sked if the petitioner vrould Lry to hAVe everyone park
in their thrae spacea o! ~ tha atreat which would leosen the impact on the area.
M$. Jouglard steted she will talk to her vieitors nnd noted there are quita a
~ew vieitars because thare ere eo many people living at ths house. 8he steted
she hns not had any prob lem with her neighbora.
ACTIONs Commissioner La Claira o!lered a motion, seaonded by Co~maisainner
McHurney and MOTION CARRIBD (Commissionar Bushore voting no), that the Hnaheim
City Planninq Commission hee raviewed the proQosal to ratai.n a qaraqe
convereion with waiver o! minimum nua~bar o! parking spaaes on a
irragularly-ahaped parcel o! land consistinq oi' approximst~sly 6,185 equare
feet located at the easterly terminus ot Mall Place nnd furthar described ae
2500 W. Mall Placet and doas heraby approve th~e t~l~qative Declaration lrom the
requirement to prepare an anvironaaental impact report on tihe baeim that there
would ba no eiqnificant individual or cua~ulative adverae anvironmental impaat
due to tha approval o! this Negative Declaration sinae the l-nahuim General
plan designatea the subjact property !or low den~rity reaidential land uaes
coamanst~rate with tha p~opoaals that no sensitive environmantal impacta are
involvad in tha proposalt that the Initial 8tudy eubmitted by the petitioner
indicates na siqnilicant individuel or cuwulative a~lverae environmantal
~mpactst and thet the Naqetiva Daclaration aubstantiatinq the foroqoing
fiadings is on file in the City o! 1-naheim Planninq Departmeat.
Commiesior~er La Clair~e o!lared Rssolution No. PC83-58 and moved !or ite
psasaqe and adoption that ths 1-naheim City Planninq Coamtiesion doe• heraby
grant Va~z~iance No. 3323 Por a pariod o! tMO years on the baais of th~ unusual
MltiLiTE$. ]1N1W$IM CITY pLANNING COMMI88ION, IMRCli 7,_1983 83-145
~hap~ o! subi~at prop~rty and subi~at to th• petition~r'~ stipuldtion to
r~quir~ p~rking o!! th• ~tr~~t wh~nsv~r po~sibl• end ~ub~evt to
Znterd~partm~ntsl Comvaitt~~ r~oomnwndation~.
Jaak Nhite aoked that tNO conciition~ b~ added ae follow~s "4. That th•
variana~ vrould axpir~ two year~ lrom th~ ~lat• o! app~oval. 5. That v+lEhin
sixty (b0) dayd lrom final date o! +~pprova~ a! tlil~ vari+snos, tt~a p~Litionor
~hall reaord a cov~nsnt aqe-inet th• prop~rty raquirinq ~hat th~ exieCinq
garaqe conv~r~len ehall bo raconvezt4d to ellow ths atructure to ba u~ilited
!or parkir-q ot twp conventional automobilee, not later tMan tv-o yaars trom
dete o! approvel o! thie variance and aeid covenant ahall be approved hy the
Cit~ 1-tt.orney's O~lica prior to racordation."
On roll aall, the torequing resolution wan pnesad by the lollow~ng votas
1-7158: 80U118 r FRY, KING ~ L.A CLAIRE, MG BURNBY
NOSSs BUBHORE, HERB8T
A$BENTs NONE
ITEM NO• 16
REPORTS AND RECOMMENDI~TIONS
A. RECLA88IFICATION N0. 79-80-32 - Reque~t from Richard 8• Huston for
sxtension of time !or property located on tha west aide of Harbor
Bouleverd, approximately S52 Peet north of the centerline of Romneya Drive.
l1CTION: Commiaeloner King o!lered a motion, seconded by Comr~-issioner
Bouas and MOTION CARRIED, tha~ the Anah~im City Planninq Conuaiseion doea
hereby approve extension ot tia~a !or Iimcla~sification No. 79-89-32 to
expire on March 24, 1984.
g~ ABJ-Nppt~il+~NT NO. 82-8A - Request from Redevelopment Aqency tA abandon
portions a! certain allaye, Old Lincoln 1-venue, Claudina Stree~ and 8mily
Street.
It was natec~ the Planninq Director or his authorized represe~tative hns
detera~ined tha~t the proposed project lalla within ths det inltion of
Cateqorical Execaptions, Claea 5, as defined in the 3tate Envirc.~mentdl
Impact Report Guidelines and ia, therefore, cateqorically exaapt from the
requirement to prepare an EIR.
ACTIpt~l: Com~nieaioner 1Cing otfezed a c-otion, aeconded by Co~rmieeioner
Bauae and MDTION CARRIBD (Commieaioner Bushore abetaininq), ~hat the
Anaheim City Planning Cammiaeion does hereby recommend to the City Council
that Abdndanmsnt No. 82-81- be approved as recommended by the City ~ngineer.
C. V7IRIANC$ NO. 3134 - iLequest from Duane Hlavnicka !or an extension ot time
!or proparty located et 2648 I~ss~zil Avenue.
ACTION: Commissioner 1Cinq offered a motion, aecondad by Ca~nmieaioner
Bousa and t~JTION CAR1tIBD. that the llnaheim City Planning Conmtosion does
hereby grant a retroactive one-year extension of time for Variance No.
3~34 to axpire on February 25, 1984.
MINUTES, ]1NANSIM CITY PI.ANNINa COMMI88ION~ MARCH 7, 1983 _ 83^146
D. CONDiTiONJ~I. U8$ PERMIT N0. 2287 • Rsquest lrom Je!lrey L. Thompson
(Cempinq World), !or clarilicetion o~ permitted uaes on prop~rty located
et 866 S. `iaet Street.
Je!! Thumpson, (3enorel Manaqer of Camping World, wae pre~ent to anewer any
queatione.
Cammiaeione r Buehore etet:ed when the original conditional uee permit wee
diecuaeed, it wea etated there wc~uld be no overnight parkinq oP
recreationa 1 vehioleet thet there are no reatroom Pacilitiee availablo
after. the shop ia clomed and vehicles other tt~en thoee which ere
eelf-conta.i ned ere permittec9 to park here~ and that there are five or eix
cdmping are ae in the erea which hevo provlded recreationnl and rostroom
facilitiey. Mr. '1'hompaon rRplie~d they are of~~ring a 24-hour service but
da not went a campground.
Commiesi~ner Susl~ore etated I~e underatands if the lot is not full, people
can etny e s lonq eg they like.
Mr. Thompaon roapnndod to Commiaeloner Buehore that they cin not have a
dumping ata tion. Commisaioner. euehore etated he under etende occesi.onally
people do dump water on the gtraet and there are reaidentiai t~omes acr~ee
the street And regidenta heve seen thls occur.
Mx'. Thompson atmteci they are willing to do whatever is nmcessary to
reeolve the prublems and will police the lot if nec~asar.y. He stated they
liave e lot of cur~tomere who travel quite a distance for their service and
want to provide a place for t~1om to park.
Commiesioner Bushore s*:~~.d he had observed their pnrk.inq lot in Newhall
and it was completely filled end a lot of the vehicles were not
self-conta ined. He stated he was concerned about Ghe security of the
neighborhood. He stated he felt if those residents hdd known that campinq
was going to be permitted at this location they wnuld have obj~±cted to
tt~te uee. Ne staLed he felt the petitioner shou'.d e-:t'^^r have the repair
facility and catalog sales or improve the ~:~.rp.srty for a crmpground.
Cheirman Fry aqreed wikh Comcnisai~ner Bushcre nnd steted Ae wuuld not
object to a person etayinq overniqht it his vehicle i~ being repa3_red. He
recommended the matter be aet for 3 public hearinq.
Annikn Saratalahti, Aseistant Director fur Zoning, stated the applicant
would have to pay Fo:• readvertising for a public heari~iq.
Commiseioner Bush~re clerified that he was the pureon who complained
becauee same of the neighbors had complained to him.
It was the qeneral conseneus of the Com~n.isaion that this matter should be
set for public hearing so that property ownere within 300 feet would be
aware of the requeat.
__...~.__._...:,
, ~
MINOT$8 ANAH~IM CITY PLANNIN(1 COMMISSION, MARCH 7, 1983 83-147
g, pEt~igtUL Pt.11N AMSNDNaNT N0. 182 - Request lrom the Flnnning Depairtment tor
cler.itication ra qarding th~ appropxiete Exhibit deciaion recommondod to
th• City Council at the February 23, 1983, m~eting.
Joel Fick, AasistenC Director for Plnnninq, explnineA thie requeet is far
clarilicstion re qerdir~g Che appropriate exhibit deeiqn rncommended Lor
a~pproval by the Planni~q Commi~Bion to the Clty Council in conjunction
with Generel Pla n Amendment No. 182.
Commiesioner Herbet explnined }ie ha~i offered the resolution for commerci+~l
olfice deeiqnation.
ACTION: Commiss ioner Herbst ~tferod a motion, eeconded by Commiesioner
King and MOTION CARR'!ED (Commieeioner Bushore and McHurney ebateining),
that Exhibit A Amanded was approved i.n conjunction with General Plan
Amendment Na. 1 g 2 et the Fobruary 23, 1983, meeting !or the Commercial
office design~tion.
F. C1~NYON ARI:A - Re ~idential denoiti~e nnd cumulative impacta requeatod by
City Council.
Joel F'ick, Aasi s tanC Directnr for Planninq, preaented a etaff report ta
the Planninq Cam:nission reviewing the planning proce8a of the Anaheim
Canyon Aree poi nting aut growth io proceeding within planned ranqea,
thouqh at a somewhat slower pacej that the planne~l growth has been
drlQC~llAtt~lY assesaed ~~nd no further cornpreheneive enviranmNnr_nl assesamen~
for th~ u~eim Hills erea is needed at thiB time. Nowever, specialized
tnv'•• ~al ertd technical studies (i•e• tralfic) may be required for any
eu~;:,~,~ ,•~ hroposed land uae alternatives to insure n hiqh quality of
municip~ ~•.cos in all project areas. He added ataff would commend the
Plann~ng Gommis sion on ite forward thinking and viqilance in such vital
advanced planni ng iKBUea.
George Maeon, Gunston Nell Company, etated over 40 environmental impact
reports have been prepared since 1972 for this area, with 23 of those
being since 197 7. He noted there have also been aubstant.ial reductiona in
the approved denaitiea - from 15,000 to 9,600, or less than 80• of the
authorized unit s, with ultimate developcuent of 8,500 on the A200 acresr
that the ov~ral 1 denaity in thp oriqinal plane wae indicated as 3.5 unita
per acre and the built-out portion today is at 2.5 units per acre. He
stated there we re aome 1700 of the originally approved units not built
because of cha n ges in the cwzket in the Anaheim Hilla Planned Community.
Mr. Mason etated they are asking for consideration to prnvide the kind of
houainq people are c3emanding and this atudy juat completed by staff
demonatratee there are adequate facilities. He referred to traffic
studiea which i nd~catPd as of Auguat 1980, all of the roads in the area
are o~rating r~t Service Level A which is below desiqn capacity. He
etated there is a problem at Itaperial and Santa Ana Ca.nyon Road, and
mitigation a-ay be required at that interaecti.on.
Commissioner Herbst etated this inf ~- atLion haa answered a lnt of
Commiasion's queaLions. He stated, ': wrever, he ia concerned about traffic
,~ w
MINUTSS 11N~t1~IM CITY PLJINNINO COMMI88ION~ M1-RCH 7, 1983 83~148
et Imperiel er,d what will heppen when the area is built out if Imparial,
Serrano end Fairmont tra!!ic probl~+me sze not reeolved. Ha added if.
8errano hed be+en continued into Ornnqo, that would solve part o! the
problom, but Aneheim Hilis Inc. did not do their pert.
Mr. Maeon etetad the ba~i¢ probl~m is that there muat be ocononiic
juetilication for the conatruotion o! roedwaya and thero is na wey
Texnco-Anaheim Hills, Inc. could ever recovez An investmenc o! the kind
required !or that aliqnment of 8errnno Avenue.
Respondinq to Commissio~er Herbat, Mr. Mds~n etnted until th~ Bauer Rancl~
Aevelopment starts and the first aegmQnt of Weir Canynn Road is
aonstructed, t:hey wi.ll not develop Areae 9 and ]0. Ne $tated he
understanda from plenners ot the Douglae Ranch that they are ready to
dincuse develnpment of that property. He ateted co~tects with
repreactntatives of Kaufman and Brond indicate na decision hes beem m~de on
the Bauer Ranch, but at the mua-ent they anticipete actually startinq
physical wor.k before the and ~f this year.
He atated they have had no indication of any planning activity on thA
Wallace Ranch.
Commiasioner Herbst atated with this information and with ataff'a
indicetion that the Commission will be kept up to date regerding
cumuletive effects of any additional projecta, he felt hie concerns have
been anawered. He euqgeated Anaheim Nills, Inc. and other developers in
the area contact Bruce NsstAnde, our representative, who ia interested in
eliminating some of the r.oads from the CouT~ty P.oads Ganeral Plan which aro
needed in the area and also auggeated the City staff and Planning
Commissi~on contact Mr. Nestande.
ACTIUN: Commissioner F~ +i%st offered a motion, second~d by Commir~sionc~r i,a
C1r aire and MOTION CARRIED, that the previous cnotion rec~amtending that the
City Council require an environmental impact report on tho cumulative
impacta of any increased density in the Anaheim Hille area be rescinded on
the baeis that information has been submitted indicatinq that facilities
are adequake at the present ti.me and that additional information will be
provided as requests arE ma3e.
Prior to voting or ~• r~revious motion, Cotnmissioner La Claire stated
~here ie only a 2.. ~'•:ference between the units planned in Anaheim Hills
in 1977 and the actual development. She stated we are on target and these
fi,gur.es are based on the General Plan as it stands now and it ia posaible
people will want to increase the den~ity ir. ~ future and that Cormission
should have updates on tha EIR whenever an; :~uw project comes in.
Joel Fick stated now that staff has developed thia quideline, evert• time a
proposal is submitted, the infrastructur.es can be re-ev~luated.
Concerning tr-e deletion of Serrano from the General Plan, Mr. Fick s;tated
the county itt studyinq that deletion and an environmental impact report
concerning thet de2etlon will be released in about a week and steff will
evaluate that report and aubmit their analyeis to the Commisalon.
~
~
MINiJTEB~ 11t~111H3IM CITY i+I~11NNINC COI~II88ION, M~1RCH 7, 1983 83•149
. ~ ~ ~........ ~... ..~~... ~
ADJOURNNlEt~Te Thar• bsinq no furth~r buaina~s, ~ommisaioner lCin~ o!lerad a
motion, a~aond~d by Coamaia~ioner MoBurney and MOTION C1-RRIBD,
that the meeting b• adjourn~d.
Tha m~.~ing wa~ adjournad et 3:25 ~.su.
Reopeatilully rubmitied,
~I~,~G~c. ~G v ~~"~
Edith L. Herris, 8ecra~ary
Ansheim CiCy Planninq C~uaie~aion
ELH:lm
0404N
~f~ ,>
,.
~,:; '- ` . .. ~ ~ ~ ~