Loading...
PC 1984/12/10RFGULAR MEETING OF THE AN~HEIM CITY PLANNING CUMMISSION REGULAR MBETING The c~gular meeting of the Aneheim City P1Anning Commt~aion was ealled to ocder by Chairmen Hecbst at 10:00 e.m., December 10, 1984, in the Counc~l Chambet, A quorum being present and the Commiasion ceviewed plana of the items on today'a agenda. RECBSS: 11:30 a~m. RECONVENEU; 1:30 p.m. PRBSENT Chairm~n: Herbst Commtasionere: Bouas, Bushore, Fry, Kin~, La Cla~re, McBurney ABSENT; Commts~ioner: None ALSA PR£SENT Annika S~ntalahti Jack White Jay Titus Paul Singer Jay Tashiro Greg Elastings K~!r~dra Morries ~dith Harr~s Aasiatant Di~ector f.ar Zonl.ng Aaetstant Ci.ty Attorney of.fice Engtneer Tra~tic Enylneer AssoctaL•e Planner Asaociate Planner Assistant Plann~r Planning Commission Secretary AcPRAVAL OF MINUTES: Commisstoner Fry affered a motton~ gPCOnded by Commissionec McBucney and MUTIAN CARRIED, that the minutes of the meetings of November ~4, and November 26, 19EA, be appcoved as submitted. ITEM NO 1. EIR NEGAT~VE DECLAI2ATION, 12ECLASSIFICATION NQ. 84-85-4 (READV.), WAIVER OF CODE RE UIREMLNT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO ~:`~s`,~,(READV. PUB[,IC HEARING. OWNERS: CHESTER PETERSON AND 9~VERLY ANN CUNfPTON~ 327 N. Shattuck Place, Orange, CA g2666. Property described as an i.rregularly-shaped parcel of land consisti.ng of approximately 4.4 acres located north and west of the norChwest cornEr of La Palma Avenue and impe[ial Flighway, h~'~ving approximate frontages of 60 feet on the north side of L~ Palma Avenue and 708 feet on the west side of imgerial Highway. RS-A-43,000(SC) to CL(SC). To permit a multt-screen f~~• :~ theatre and a 47-foot hi.qh semi-enclosed restaurant with on-aa].e beer and w~... •~:h waiver of minimum number of parkinq spaces. Contf.nued from the meettngs of Augunt 6, 20, September 17, October 1, 15, 29, November 14. Thsre were two persona tndicating their presence in opposition to subject request and althou~h the staf~E report was not cead, ft is r~ferred to and made a part o£ the mi~nutes. ~ 783 12/10/84 <' MINU7`ES, ANAHCIM CITY PLANNING COMMTSSInN~ DECEMBER 121_1984 84-784 aruce Sanborn, 13 Corporate Plaza, Newport Beach, stated this matter was contin~~~d in order for them tu uktempt to get the cooperati.on of Sutherland Lumber for a cammon driveway And they we[e unsuccesaEul in thak attemptt ~nd that they were also supposed to reaolve pr.oblemp with the Meccury Savings cepcesentatives pertaining to the laeation of the proposed restaurant and they were succeasful in that attempt and are pre~enting a reviePd plan today. Bob Miller, representing Sutherl~nd Lumber Company, explained a meeting was held between the three property owners and the result of that meeting was that the developer waa to have an engineered plan pce~ared redesigning a reasonable aommon dri.veway and they did receive a revised plan i.ndtcattng the proposed restaurant relocAted to the nor.thwest corner oE khe pr.operty adjacent to Sutherland Lumber Company. He stated they woul~ have the aame objPCtions t~ thal• re~t~ucant locatton ad~acent to their property as Mercury Savings had wt~en the reatauranG was pcoposed adjacent to their propecty. He explained they had suhmitted a rough outline of theic objections to the locati.on of tfi e common driveway And stated he did not think this plan should be approved. He added they are for ttie development of that property and consider it ~m~erative that they tiave a common driveway, but tt must be deaigned far the safpty of their customera. t4r. Mtller stated they are also very concerned abQUt the request for watver oi parking spaces and ttiought i.t would create a~roblem for them during those ti.~es when the theatre is vecy busy and thei.r store i.s also busy, such as Saturdays and Sundays. He added they also feel a medtan stri.p on La Palma Avenue would adversely affect their business and future growth and explatned 908 of thetr customers use the Imperial/La Palma tntersection with 60e of their total sales coming from people living in the Anahetm Hills area and Yorba Linda. He ~teted so far therE is no assurance that an access would be allowed off Impertal and without that access, there ts no way this developme~t wo~ld ever work. Concerning the .location of the proposed resiaurant ar~d the proposed driveway, Mr. Miller stated they feei this proposed plan would not be safe far the community and they are also concerned about the trash, cooking odors and fltes and also they are concerned about the park.ing and exp:a3ned they have not ~een any plans far the restauranl. He added they t~ave suggested the locatton of the restaurant rema~n where it is now, or be moved to the far corner next to the theatre, or adjacent to its current site. Mel Kapson, representing Mercury Savings and Loan, stated to some extent he would agree with the Sutherland repreaentat~ve regarding the contemplated closure of lhe me~i.an str~p on J~a Palma and felt that would create a major traffic problem and it ~s absolutely impera~:ive that tf this plar, ts approved by the Plannfng Commission, the Imperial access be obtained from the state prior to issuance of ccn:~tr!~ction permfts. He ~tated th~f have no objections to the development as proposed in the revised plans. Mr. Kapaon stated there is a proposed condtti.on requiring the approval of the City Engineer for drainage and pointed out that thii unimproved land acts as a reservoi.r dur.tng normal rainy periods and when thfs development occurs, it will no longer be available for the percolation of that water into the ground and it appears the only way fo* the water lo drain woul~ be onto the driveway to La Palma and he felt the Commission should require that the water drainaye services be prouided prior to the issuance of any permits. 12/10/84 a~':. :~ MINUTES, ANANEIM CITY PLANN,[NG COMMISSION,_DECEMBER 12~ 1984 84-7A5 R~~asell Wilaon, managec of 5uthecJ.and Lumber Company, explai.ned tt waa evecyone'e feeling at the Not~kmb~r 19Ch mePttng th~t the restaurant r~nd common driveway ibsues would be resolved and Chat th~ developer would present An eng~neered plan that cou.ld be agreed unon that would rea~ly wark; hnwevec, the revised plans eh~w the drivewfiy in b location thet i.s not reaAOnable bnd Chc~ resl•t~urAnt would ~ie odjacent k.o their £aciltty and they du no~ thi.nt~ that plan is acceptaule. Mr. Sanborn stated na mWtter rrhich way the dciveWay is turned, there will be a T-sltuation because it h~s to be aligr~ed with ttie drtveway across the atreet and that ts a conrkrai.nt they h~d ta work wtth and tt~r_ common c3r.i.veway was engineered the best they could and that 5utherland Lumber was not tn agteement wi.th the plans with the cammon dctveway next. to Mercury Savings. THE Pt38LIC HEARING WA5 CLASED. Comm.tssi.oner L~a Clatre atated she did nc~t under~tand why ~hey were unable to reach a camprnm~se ~n the dri.veway location and painted nut no matter what goes onto that ~+~~~perty, the r~ccesu on i,a Palma i~ going to be cloaed btcbuse it is already a hazard. She stated ahe thought the r~evi~Pd plans wi.ll not work with trafff.c tcytny to come in and other tra~ftc backing out of the parking spaces inta ~.he dcfiveway and noted the tcatfic will all b~ concentrated into one aceu. Mr. Sanbocn ~tated the plan i.s identi.cal to khe ptevious one re~arding traffi.c, except for the locati.on of the new ces~aurant. Paul Str-ger, Traff+ic Eng~raeec, stated the driveway will :.tay the way it is w~th right-tucn in and right-turn out only Eor boCh dciveways and there are two 90 degree turns 'becaa~se of the location of the restaurantp hawever, i.t i.s p~ssible to move the: resraurant over another 60 Eeet to the north whtch would provide somewh~t fewer tvcns and allow more roam Co maneuve~. Commissfionec 'La Claire stated th~.s t~ one oE the worst internal circulation plan~ st~e nas ever seen, except Ep: ~he Rinker Shop~i.ng Center on Imperial which was a mistake she does not want to make agatn, and that she liked the old plan bettec and thouyt~t it cou2d have t~een worred out; and that she had no problem with khe tcash loeati.on because Meccury Savtnga has thelr trash thece too. Mr. Sanborn ~tated Herc~cy Savfnga diil not like the oId plan and now Sutherland does not like the rev.tsed plan. H~e atated they cannot put the cestaurant nn the east property line because of the setback requirements off Imperial and it could not be located in the center ~f th~ property becuuEe of the l•raffic si~.~ation and the only place ts on the westerly property line. ~omm:Issionec Hrrbst suggested the access off Imperial be plannsd so Lhat it goes right on through to Sutherland which woUld allow another access from their business d~artng their busy hours and ~t could be designed to service all four businesaes. Paul Singer stated that was the original plan and wtth the restaurant tn ita prior locat~an behind Mercury Savings, the access could havp s~rved all the businesaes, but since that could not be worked out, the same thing could be 12/10/84 ~ .- ;~ , MINUmES, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMIS:ION, UECE,MBER 12. 1984 ~4-786 ~accompltshed by movtng the .cearaurant build~ng to the norkF~. He expl.Ained with that plan, the present driveway at Mercury Savtngs would be clo~ed ~~ith a combi.ned driveway provided between the two pcoperties where the Suthec'land dr~.veway is presently loc~ted with a E~11 interaecli.on provided for ttie~ commercial center accosa the atreet and the two drivewaye would have left-turna in and lel:t-turns ~ut. Chairmar~ Herbat clarifted that Sutherland was not agr~eable to a common driveway at the beginning, but now the;~ are, if it ~s properly deaignpd. Mr. Sanborr: responded to Commissiunec Bouas kh~t the accesa Erom Imperial is a aonditi~on of this development and ~Eter thia approval, they can approach CAI.TRANS. Fegarding the "T", he explatnec~ the pl~ns ahow thAt th~ right-turn in is not made at the last dri.veway next to Sutherland, but somewhece in the mi.ddle with a right turr, towards Mercury and fucther explatned there are three driveways at Sutherland and a peraon cou].d take a turn at the fi:st or seaond dri.veway- but noL• the thi.rd. Bob Miller stated the ori.yinal plan submitted to Sutherland Lumber was very poorly engineered with the theatre traf~tc right agatnst their buiiding and the plan was prepared with no input from them and at that ttme, he made three different sketches with suggestions of how t.hey felt a common drivpway should be destgned wi.th the theatce next to the cai.lroad tr.acks and aqreed that after it had been properly planned, he would acrange a mee4iiq wtth Mr. Sutherland. He stated when the plans were submitted three weeks later, they had no i.de~ how many parkin9 apaces would be lost and also did nok feel the pcaposed facility would have adequate parking and were afratd khe theatre or restaucant patrons would be p~rking on their property. He expiained they were not against the pcopo~al with the restaurant a~jacent to Mercury Savings; however, they would prefer to see it in the corner. He at~ted they wanted to pcotect the La Palma access and do not want to inconvenience their customers by having that access closed, Fle stated he has sug~ested they rebuild the restaurant right where it is currently located as another alternative. Chairman Nerbst clarified that if the drive~~ay rema.ins where it is currently located for Sutherland, the current Mercury driveway will be closed and a common driveway ceul~i be accomplished with le~:t-turns in and out wh{ch would serve Suthecland, the theatre, Knollwoods, Mercury Savings and the Christtan erothers Market across the street. Nr. Mi11er stated that has been the plan all along, but alony with that there must be the T.mperial access. He stated their coricern ia that the driveway will not be properly de~igned and with the I,-sftuatton tn front o£ theic buildin~, it cauld be very dangerous for their custom~rs with the theatre patrons 1~aviny the eite. Chairman Herbst stated he thought if there is a driveway to Imperial, rather thAn gaing out to make a left-turn onto La Palma. Suthecland customers could ga o~t and make a right-turn ~nto Imperial and that would help their businesa. Mr. Miller stared they do not want to commit to a common drive because they do not th~.nk it would be adequate without the guarantee they would 5ave access to Imperfal. Mr. Sanborn asked if the common driveway is needed for this development, Chairman Herbst stated the Commission has to 12/10/89 ;~;; + 1 MINUTES ANAHEIM CTTY PLANNING COMMISSION AECEMBEIt 12 148A 84-787 look at r.he l.and use deve~opment of this percel and the trafftc that ta alceady on Jmperial and La Palma. Ne ateted he usea those streets everyday and is very familiar wi.th the traffic pcoblem and a1RO now that the W~eir CanXon Accesa bridge ia open, there is a lot more tra~fic on La Palma and the common dciveway And accesa to Imperia.l sre a must. Mr. Sanborn stated the Sutherlan~l busi.nesa will be clo~ed when the theatCe has its biygest traffic impact a~d that most peoplr flttendtng the Saturday afternoon matinees ride bicyclea or are dropped-of.f by theic parents and are not old enough to drive. Chairman Herbst atated there wi.ll noL be very many btcycle~ coming into that area because thts area ia ~uite a distance from the housing .in that area. Mr. Sanborn stated most of r.heir c~ast~mecs would ur~e ImPertal. Commissioner Ga Clai.ce E;tatE~d most af tt~p people who live in Anahe.tm Hills ares would use Imperi~J. ~nd Hc. Sanborn responded that should reduce Sutherland concecns. H~ at~ted they cannot have the common drl.veway if the restaurant i~ locar.F:d wt~erc was before. He stated they could probably move the cestaurant la o~.~ 1`~ teet to the north. Chairman Herbst added he thought it cuuld be moveJ a J.o~ further th~n that. CommiasioneX L». Clai.~e atated an industrial bui.lding cou'ld be butlt on the property berau:;e i.t is industrially zonec3; and that ttie traffic pattecn on that propecty r.ight now is very bad and with the pcoposed circulatton plan, there i.s on1X about a 25-to 30-foot area with everyone exittng from the theatre and khe customers from Knollwoods trying to br~ck out of thetr parking spaces. Mr. ~anbocn ~tated no m+~tter what, there would be krafEic backi.ng out of those par'~cing spaces, He stated bastcally the theatre wtl.l be operattny wt~en all the other businessea ace closed and its peak would be ~n Saturday night froR. 9:00 to 10:00 p.m. Paul S~.nger stated the only problem traffic time would be with Saturday matinees and very few people would be parking then and would be comi.n9 tn to drop their children off; and that the greate~t exodus of traffic from the t7eatre wAUld be when the other businesses ace not ~pen and khere would be very li~ttle c:onflict. He also explained rhece would be several different theatres and they would not all let ~ut at the same time. Mr. Sanborn stated an alternattve use Eor this property would be an industrial buildiny or office building which would cceate more of a~roblem for Sutherland Lumber and traffic problems for that intersection and he thought everyone had agreed that this would prabably be the bPSt use Eor this property. Commissir~nec La Clatre stated there would be duuble traffic for the Saturday matinees with parents dropping their children aff and then picking them up. She stated the theatre and restaucant, which is busy all the time, would all be tcying to use a 30-foot wide driveway. Chairman Herbst clariffed that .tf this plan is approved with the two driveways and the median on La Palma being closed, they would have to come up with a common dXiveway in the mfddle, He stated most of Sutherland's business is from Anaheim Hills ar~d he cottld not vote for approval of this cevised plan 12/1Q/84 MINUTE5~ ANAHEIM CITY P~~NNING COMMISSION, DEC~MHER 12, 1984 84-788 becau$e it would harm Sutherland. He stated Sutherland hAS Aaid they will come to an agreetnent, but it has lo be wo~~^~ out between the two property ownerB. He asked if they woul~ lik~ a continuance in ocder to resalve these tasues. Commisaton~r L~ Claice stated the incentive for wanting to have a common driveway io that any project that g~ea onto that property will cequire the closure of the access on La Palma. Mr. Sanborn stated i.t is poasible they will never agree and will continue to come to ~hese he~ri.ngs and oppose any use that is proposEd until they get the one thAt they want and ~hey could eta11 many prujects for a].ong ti.me. Commissioner La Claire sl-ated the Commission has seen th9.s problem befoce and she thtnks the developer tias worked very hard on thist hnwevec, she would like to see the threc propecty owner representatives get together and solve thQ problems of the c.ommon dc~veway and coopecate and partiatpate in getttng the access on Imperisl Appruved. Chairmen Herbct st~ted it appears SutherlAnd is wi.lltng to compromise on the common driveway and if the plan ts ~~proved, they would lose the La Palma access and it appears evecyone has an i.ncentive to work together for a common driveway and to get the access to Imperial. Pa~l Singer 3tated Conditi.an No. 3 prohibiks lhe use unless approval is obt.atned from CALTRANS for imperial access. Commissioner E~~~hore stated he thought part of the prablem is that there are na plana available for the restaucant which the other property ownErs can review. Mr. Sanborn stated plans were submikked at the last hearing and the ceataurant will have same type of wood exterior and the plan does not change the exterioc and he thought Sutherland and Mercury had seen them. Commissioner aushore stated he thought the}• were probdbly more r~ncerned about the outside eating area, exhaust f~mes, etc. Mr. Sanborn stated Knollwoads delivered a rough skekch of their plans showtng the location of the outdoor eatiny areas between the restaurant and theatre. Commissioner La Claire clarified that Mercury Savings representatives and Sutherland representatives are willing to work with this deve~oper, poin~ing out a variance was gcanted Por Mercury Savxny~ and she felt the C.tty has done their part. Commissioner Bushore state~ he realizes nothing can be done about the Mercury Savings traah, but thought the location of the restaurant's trash needs to be addreased and thoughk movtng the restaurant to the north and having the trash located on the main thoroughface so it could be picked up quickly, with posaibly a c.ircu]ar driveway, should be considered. Kendra Morries, Assietant Planner, stated staff was only given a revised site glan end no interior or exter~or plans and they were also giveri a verbal indicati.on the height of the restaurant would be lowered to 35 feet i.n conformance witt~ Code. I2/10/84 MINUTES, ANAHBIM CYTY PLANNING COMMISSION. DECEMBER 12~ 1904 84-789 Mr. S~nborn eteted they d~d not R~ove th@ ~estaucant n~xt to the theatre because it w~s their undecstanding the most efficient use of. the parking lot would be ~a have Che ceataur.Ant pdtrons perk or, the north side oE Merauty Savinga and the theatre cuatomera park tn front of the thcatt~ and lf the restaurAnt wao next to rhe Cheatres, the cuatamecs wou.ld be competing for tl~ose spots on the northerly part of the parki.ng lot. ChAirman tl~rbat stated the resteurant could be placed in the carnec next to Impertal or in the same locetton as it is currently existing. Mr.. Sanborn respanded it could not be on Impecial ~ecause of the setback requtrementsj however, they cquld rnove it 15 to 20 feet north on the western pc~perty 1tnP. Pa~l Singer stated it ~ou.ld not be 1~ nted f~arthec south because o~ the ].eft-turn lane and tt~e closer to the internection, the more difficult to make the left turns. Mr. Sanborn stated atter all this time he was beg.inntng to wonder if this could ever be worked out with the property owners agreetng. Chairman Herbst stated everyone has a commnn tnterest here because of L•he ~ccess and traffic problems tn the area. Mr. Sanborn explained Sutherland is not in fsvor of hooktng up to Imperial with their last driveway. Mr. Mi11er stated wtthout an engineered plan, tt is hard to make commente= that Knollwood ic rhe one who wants to develop thts site and has the most to gatn wtth a nice new butlding and tie thougf;t they should request a variance of the ~etback requirements or remain in the present locatton and they do not want to have the restaurant and theatre in the same northeast corner, but now want to put the restaurant next to the Sutherland Lumber and that Sutherland is open 14 houra a day and does uaQ all 5 acres of their propetty, even L•hough the parktng is all in Front, because theLr customers h~ve to pull aroun~ to the cear to pick up merchandise. He stated they are concerned about the parking waiver and also hecause Knellwood is busy during lunch ttme and their customers might spill over onto their parking lot. He stated they could ~lsa build next to the old stte, but that would r.equire a setback waiver. Commissioner La Claire suggested posting the Sutherland property eo tr~fftc w~uld not entEr the lask driveway because they have three separate driveways. Mr. Miller stated he was sure a good engineered plan could be designed and they wo~ld still lfke to see the driveway curved back in, but the restaurant would sti11 have to be moved. Mr. Singer stated the dr~veway would have to be moved northerly, subject to the restaurant moving. A variance for the required setback on Imperial was discussed with Chairman Hecbst suggest~ng the pet~tioner cnnsider applying for a variance. He stated this iE the only piece of pco~erty left in Anahe.im on Imperial that isn't developed and he thought a var.iance could 'ae considered so the restaurant could be located as close to Imperial as it is right now and he did not think that would set a precedent. 12/10/84 MINUTES. ANAHBIM CITY PI,ANNING COMMISS2nN. DECBMBER 12j ~984 8a-790 Kendra Morri~s etated if Planning Commtseton te willing to approve such a variance, the applicdnt can reviae the plansr however, the motter would have to be reAdvert~aed. It was clarified that the aztback of Carl's Jr. across th~ atreet is probably about a5 feet. Cammieaioner ~uahor.e atAted he thought the p.lan could be engineered wi.th the pcoper circulation and wi.th no varisnces requi.red. Chaicman Herbot offered a moti.on, second~d by Commissi.oner King, that considecation of the aforemPnttoned matter be continued to the meeting of January 7, 1985, in ur~er Ear the appl.icant to aubmit revised plane. No vote was taken on that motion. Kendra Morri.es pointed out the plana would need to be submikted by TuESday, Decernber 19th, in order to be readvertised for Lhe January 7th m~ettng. Mc, Sanborn stated they can make thp deAdli.ne if they do not have to have agreement with tiutherland. It wa3 noted that Sukherland and Mprcury Sav.ings representatives are williny to cooperate. Chatrman Herbst asked if the Sutherland and Mercury represe~tatives are willtng to consider allowing the theAtre customers to exit on their pcoperty in front of thetr butldtngs and out the common driveway, tf the restaucant is placed on ImpertAl. Mr. Mtller responded to Chairman Herbst that they would have to see drawings before they could make a comm~nt; however, he thought ths driveway could angle back in end if the restaurAnt ts moved to the Imperial side and the common driveway is properly deaigned with the right amount of parking, he weuld present that plan to Mr. Sutherla~d and ~aw no reason why they would not agree stnce they know the La Palma access is going to be closed. Mr. Kapaon stated they have aat tn on evecy meeting they have been awace of and wil~ continue to do so and have cooperated in every opportunity they have been o~fered and the only requirement they have is that the restaurant be a minimum of 50 to ~0 feet away from theic facility and everything else that has been considered such as mutual parking, mutual egress to Imperial, mutual driveway onto La Palma, etc. they will wock for and aastst tn anyway they can. I*_ was felt the matCer sh4uld be cont~nued to January 21at rather than January 7th. ACTIQN: Commxssioner La Claire offered a motion, seconded by Commisstoner Bouas and M~TION CARRIED th~t consideration of the aforementioned matter be cont.inued to the meeting of January 21, 1985, in order for the petitioner to su~m~t reviaed Qlans. Commissioner Bushar. stated there is no guarantee that a varianre will be granted and that he will not make uQ his mind until he sees tne plans. Jack White explained the Planning Commission cannot legally cornmit to granting a vartance until tY:ay have considered all the evidence pcesented at the public hearing. 12/10/84 MINUTES, ANAHEIM CI~Y PLANNING COMMTSSION, DEC~MBER 12~1984,,,_ 84-791 ITEM N0. 2. EIR NEGATIVE DECLARATION ANA COND_ITIGNAL USE PERMIT NO. 2619 PUHLIC HEARING. OWNERS: SCONONY MOBI~B OIL COMPANY~ INC., 17822 E~st 17th Street, TuaCin, ~A 92689, ATTti: H. ~. ERICSON AND MRS. ANNE HENNING PAUI~US, East Lake 5hoce, eig Fork, Montana 59911. PKO~erty described as an irregularly-shaped p~rcel of land conaiating of approximately 0.63 acre, located at the southeast corner of Lincol.n Avenue and Rio Vista Street, and futther desccibed as 2800 EasL• Lincol~ A.~enue (Mobil Oti). R~qusst to p~rmit conventence retatl eales in an exiating service station. Conttnued irom the meetinqs oE October 15, 29, Novembec 14, ahd 26, 19~>4. There was no one indicating their presence in opposition to subject request and althouqh the staff report was not read, it ts referred tA and made a pAr~ of the minutes. Harold Ericson, engineer., Mobil Oil Company, 3328 Alabama Circle, Costa Mesa, explained the previous hear~ng was cont~nued in ordec to provide engtneering and traffic studtes concerning the clostng of the ~rivewaya on the corners. Hatry Krueper, 568 N. Mountain View, San Dernardino, Californta, explained they analyzed both the external and internal circulatton and explatned that most of the service station faciliti.es that are on corners will accept vehicles from both roadways and usually from bokh directtons. He presented sli.de~ showing illustrattona of their recommendationa for mi.tigatton measures in order to leave the driveways open as follows: (1) Uriveways on Lincoln to the west of the intersection to provide for cight-turn only restci.ctiny left-turns out of the driveways with the use of arrows and stgns wh~ch would al~ow vecy easy accesR; and that the widCh of the entry would be about 20 feet, fncluding the bike lane, and with modtfications to the driveways with cuzb returns, tt will have easier access in and out; (2) M.itigation (b) wauld be to includQ the arrows and signs and also provxde for a soltd median island and painked out there is a pai.nted medtan at the present time; (3) Mttigation (c) would be an even more posit~ve way with a rat3ed median islanc9; however, they are not recommendi.ng that alternative. THE PUBLIC 6EARING WAS CLOSED. Paul Singer, Traffic Engi~ieer, stated interna.l cfrculat~on would not wock well if the driveways were closed and there would have to be substantial revision in urder to pro~ide good circulation, but the petitioner ~s asking for a conditional use permit and they should redestgn the circulation on khe stte by celocating the pumps to accommodate c~rculat.ion. He stated short of that, he has cohsidered several alternatfves and one is to defin~tely close the driveway closest to the intersection on Rio Vista and constrL~:~_ •~ hard median on Lincoln Avenue blocking both driveways. 12/10/84 MINUTES~ ANAHEYM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION~_OBCEMB~R 12, 1984 84-792 Commi~sianec King noted that that would menn three drivRwaye instea~ aE f.our wtth a sol.td mpdian on Li.ncoln ~venue to preclude any tucnR, and the one dcivew~y on Rio Vista, cloaesk ko the curnec, woul~ be cloaed. Chairmar~ HPrbat pointed out the accident repor.t wes su ~~itt~d and there have been 21 Accidents on that c~rner in three years. Paul Si.nyer atated two oE those accidNnts were atkri.but~ble to tt~e ~ecvi~r ~teti.on drivewAya closeot k~ the ~nteraections. ACTION: Commiss.toner King offered ~ motion, seconded by Comm~satoner Pry and MOTION ~ARRIED that the Anaheim CiCy Planni.ng Comm~ssion has revtewed the proposal ta p~rmit convenience retnil aales tn an exi.stt.ng ~ervice stetion on an irregulaxly-shapad parcel of land consisting oE approximattly 0.63 acres locatAd et the southeast cocner of Lincoln Avenue and Rtu Vi.sta Street and fucther descGibed as 2800 East I,incoln Avenuet and doea hereby approve the Negattve Declaration upon ftndtny that i.t has c~nsidered the Negative Declaratlon together with any comments ceceived diiring tl~e p~~blic review process and furthec ftndin~ o~ the buaia of the Ini.ttal Study and any commenL•s received that there is no sub~tantial evidence that the project wtll. have a stgnificant eEtect on the environment. Commissioner King offered ~tesoluti.on No. PC84-257 and moved for tts passaqe and adoption that the Anahetm City Planning Commisston doen hereby grant Conditional Use Permtt No. 2619 pursuant to Anahetm Munici.pal Code Secttons 18,03.030.03U through 18.03.030.035 and aubject to Intecdepartmental Committee recommendatians and amending Condi,tion No. 2 requicing that the most northerly dciveway on Rio Vista be remuved and Conditton No. 4 to cead: 'Tf,at che lhree remainin4 driveways shal:. te redesigned; and that a solid median shall be constructed on Lincoln Avenue in front af both driveways•. Cha~rman Herbst noted there wi11 be no sale of beer and wine at thi.a local•ton. On roll call, the Eocegofng resolution was passed by the following vote: AYES: BUUAS, FRX~ KING, LA CLAIRE~ MC BURNEY NOFS: BUSHORE~ H£RHST ABSENT: NONE Chairman Herbat atated he was opposed to t.he project because he felt it is a dual use af this prflperty. Jack White, Assistant City Attorney, pre~ented the written right to appeal the Planning Commission's dectsion wi.thin 22 days to the Ctty Council. RECESS: 3:05 p.m. RECONVENED: 3:15 p.m. IT6~ N0. 3. EIR CATEGORICAL BXEMPTION-CLASS 3 AND VARIANCE NC. 3438 PUBLIC HEARING. OWNERS: ROBERT A. AND ROSEMARIE 5MITH, 13729 E. Rosecrans Avenuer Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670. AGENT: MIKE ALDERSON, P.O. Box 399, Atwood, CA 926U1. Property described as an frreyularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of approximately 2.3 acres, 1431 South Sunkist Street (U-5tore). 12/10/Q4 MINUT~Sj ANAHEIM CITY PLANNTNG COMMISSION,_QECF.MBER 12. 1984 __ 84-793 Waivers of maxim~~m fence height to conetrucl a concr~te b1ocY, fence. Continued from Che m~et~ng of November 14, 194. ACTION: C~mmiasi.oner K.i.ng o~fared ~ mation, seconded by Commi.eatoner eouas and MOTION CARRIED thAt conaideration of the aEnremAnti,on~d matte[ be continuQd to ~he regularly-scheduled ot• January 7, 1985, in order Eor the appltc~nt to aubmit roa'~nad plans as requeated by the Planntng Commisaton. IT~M NO. 4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NU. 254 (PR~V. CF,RT~, WAIVER OF COD~ RE9UIREMENT AND CONDYTIONAL USE PBRMIT NOy, . 2634 PUBGIC H~ARING. QWNERS: DOUGLAS E. JONES, ET AL~ 2045 50uth HaCboC Boulevur~, Anahelm, CA 92802. ANAHEIM REGBNCY HOTEL, 2045 South Narbor Boulevatd, Anaheim, CA 92802, ATTN: WALTER HONG, JR. Pcogerty deacrtbed as an ~cregularly-shaped paccel of land conat~ting af approxima~ely 3.3 acres, 2U45 South Harbor eoulevatd (Regency tlotel). To permit a]18-room hotel with accessory usea tncluding a Cestauranl•, outdoor eating area and on-sale alcoholtc beverages with wRiver of mtnimum number of parking space$. 'rhere was no one indt~ating thexr presence in opoosition to subject request and although the staff report was no~ read, it is referred to and made a part of the minutes. Walter Hong, representtng Anahetm Regency Hotel, explained they changed the scope of this project= that the square footage remains basically ti~e same and the only thing they have changed is to convert some of the rooms tnto a banquet room and some of the outdoor spaces foc eating. TNE PUBLIC H~ARING WAS CL~S~U. Mr. Hong responded to Chairman Herbst that they ace willing to c~mply wtth the conditfons requiring the 8-root high block wall on the we~t propecty line and to enter i.nto an agreement to provide more parking tn the future if a parking study determines that more packing is needed. ACTIOt7: Commissionec Kfng cffered a motion, seconded by Commissioner Bauas and MOTIpN CARRIEp that the Environmental Impact Report No. 2y4 was previously cectified by the City Council on May 11, 1982, in conjunctton with the original approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 2322 perm~tt.ing a 6-storyr 68-foot high, 4@8-room hotel on subject property and the petitioner has submitted the addendum to EIK No. 254 for Plann~ng Commission considecat~on and that after considering an addendum to Environmental Impact Report No. 254, the Planning Commission does hereby approve s~id addendum on tt~e basis that ft ts in compliance with the Califorr,ia Environmental Quality Act and th~ City end State CEQA Guidelines and the~e are no significant environmental tmpacts identified. Commissioner King offered a motion, seconded by Commissioner Bouas and MOTION CARRIED that the Anaheim City ?lanning Commi.ssion ~oes hereby gcant waiver of Cade requirements on the basis that the parking waiver will not cause an increase in tcaffic congestion in the immediate vfcinity nor adversely affect 12/10/84 MINUTES. ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION, D6CEMBER 12. 1984 64-794 any dd~oining land uees and gcenting of the pack~ng w~iver under the cond~k.~ona impoDed, tf any, wtll not be detrimentel to thM N~aco, heAlth, e~fety and general welfAre of the cikizena ~f the City of Anaheim end fucther r.hat the ~~etit.toner hae atipulated to provide additional ;acking epaces in the future i.f a traEfi.a atudy determinea that addi.tional apac~a are needed. Commi.setonec King offared Reaolutton No. PC84-258 and moved for i.ta pasenge and adopti~n that the Anahelm City Pl~nning CommiASion doe~ hereby grant Cond.itional Use Permit No. 2634 pursuant to Analieim MunicipAl Code ~ecti.on~ 18.03.030.030 through 18.03.030.03~ and aubjec~ to Interdepactmenkal Committee rHCOmmendatio~s. On roll call, the Eureqoing resolution was pb~se~ by the Eollowing vote: AYES: BOUAS~ DUSHORE, FRY~ I1°RBST~ KING~ LA CLAIRE~ MC AURNEY NUES: NONE ABSENT: NONE IZ'EM N0. 5. EIR NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND CUNDITI4NAL USE PEkMI1' N0. 2641 PUBLIC HGARIP~(i. QWNERS: ANAFlBIM SCHOOL UISTRICT OF ORANCE COUNTY~ ATTN: JAMES BRIEFt, 412 E. B~oadway, Anahei.m, CA 92605. AGENT; MELUDYLANll SCHOOLS AND COLLEG~;S, ATTN: RAY MCMURTRY, 2000 W. Ball Road~ AnAheim, CA 92804. Property deacribed as a rectangularly•-shaped parcel of land conststi.ng of approximately 7.8 acre~s, ZU00 W. Ball Road (forrr,erly Key Elementar.y School)•• To retain t~ private edur.attonal institutton i.n an exi.stiny school Eacil~.ty with wa~ver of m.tntmum number of par.ki.n3 spaces. It was noted the applieant was not present. Latec ducing the meetfn~l Creg Hastinga res~onded th, . staff had been unable to r.antact the petiti.oner and would recommend a cont ~uance. ACTION: Commtsa3.oner K:ng ofFeced a motton, seconded by Commissioner Fry and MOTION CARRIED that consideration oE the afocemention~d matter be conttnued to the regularly-scheduled o~ January 7, 1985, in order for the ~ppli.cant to be ~;;; present. ITEM N0, 6. EIR ~'~:rATIVE AND CON_DITZONAL_USE PERMTm N0. 2642 PUBLTC HEARItvG. qWNE.RS: LA1tRX R. SMITH AND JUOSTH I, ~MITH, 1706 Marina Bay Drive, Hunti.ngton Beach, ~A 92647. AGENT: RI~HAkD MONSOUR, AKA UICK DALG, ~296 Channel Road, Balboa, CA 92661. Froperty described as an irr~egularly-shaped parcel vf land consisting of approximately 1.6 acces located north and west of the northwest corner of Ball P.oad and Knott Street, 951 and 959 South Knott Street. To permit on-sale alaoholic bevecages ln a proposed restaurant. it was noted the appliaant was ill and could not be pcesent at today's heartng. ACTION: Commissioner Ki.ng affered a motion, seconded by Commissionex Bouas and MOTION CARRIED that consideration of the aforementioned matter be cont~.nued to the regularly-scheduled of January 7, 1985, in order for the applican~ to be pres~nt at the publ~c hearing. 12/10/84 MINUTES, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION,__UECEM~ER 121 1984 8A-795 ITEM NU. 7,__ EIIt_ NEGATTVE DBCLARATION AND VARIANCE N0. 3445 PUBLIC HEARING. OWNF.RS: RUTH C, SPENCFR AND RICHARD H. SP~NC~R, 303 Black oak Road, Anaheim, CA 92807~ Prope[ty de~acibud ae a rectangul.Arly-shaped parcel of land consf.sting of approximAtely 9,600 equare feQt located at the southweat corner oE Map1P 'Pree Dr~.vz and 131AOk oAk Road, 303 Black oak Road. Waiver of m~ni.mum setback Eor rabbtt hutches and maximum number of [Abbl.t8 to reta.in 30 rAbbita. ACTION; Commis~si.nner King offered a tnotton, a~conded by Commisstoner eouna and MUTION CARItIED that conaideration of the aforementianed matter be continuQd to the regularly-scheduled of January 7, 1985, in order tor the matter to be ceadv~rtiaed. ITEM N0. 8. EIR NEGATIVE DECLARA~IUN AND VNtIANCE NO. 3446 PUBLiC NEARING. OWN~RS; rAFA EL RERNANDEZ ANU ESTHGR F ERNANDEZ, 1534 Camden Place, Fullerton, CA 92633. P ropec~y described as a re ctAngularly-shaped parcel of lanr3 conststing of approx~mAtely 5352 square feet, 737 North Pauline Street. Waivecs oE: a) Minimum building stte drea, b) minimum floor area, c) mtntmum aide yard setback & d) minimum nUmber and type of parking apaces to construct a detached single-fami.ly dwell in9 and expand an existtng aingle-fami.ly dwelling. There was no one indicating Chet.r preaence in opposttion to subject cequest and although the skaff re~~ort was not read, it ta re£erred to and made a part o~ the minutes. Rafael Fernandez, property own er. explained he would 1 ike to build a new sing~e-family reaidence on this propecty which is zoned RM-2400 and that it will comply witt~ the zoni.ng r~eyuirements except those mentioned and thuse are neces~ary hecause in the past structures were built cl oser to the pcogerty lines, etc. He explained he also plans to increase the square footage oE the existi.ng rear house. TNE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED _ R~sponding to Commissioner Bo~sas, Mr. Fernandez explained there wtll be no outs3de access in the add.ition to the existing atr.ucture and it would not be rented out. ACTION: Commissioner King of feced a motton, seconded by Commisstoner Ery MdTION CARRIED that the Anaheim City Planninq Commissfon has reviewed the proposal to construct a stngl~-fantly detached dwelling and expand an existing s:[ngle-family dwelling with waivers of minimum building site area, minimuan floor area, minimum side yard set•back, minimum numbec and type of parking spaces on a rectangularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of approximately 5352 aquare f~~t having a f rontaqe of approximately 48 feet on the west side of Pauline Street and further deacribed as 737 North Pauline StrePt; and does hereby approve the Negative DFClarat~an upon fi~nding t hat tt has conaidered 12/10/84 MINUTES, ANAHEIM CI7'Y PLANNING COMMISSTQN, DECEMdER 12. 19~A 84-79b the Negakive Dealar.ation together with any comments received during the publtc cev~ew process and Eurth ec findinq on the bASia of the Initial Study dnd any commenta recetved that t hece ta no auhstantial evidonce that t.he pcoject wi11 have a s.igniflcant effec t on the environment. Comm~ssianer Kinq oFfered Resolution No. PC84-259 and moved for ite passage and adoption that the A n aheim City Plann~ng Commtasion does hereby grant waivers (a), (b) and (c) on the basis th~t there are opecial circumskances applicable to the proper ty such as aize, ahApe, topography, locati.an And surroundinge which do no t apply to other identically zoned ~ropecty in the same vicinityt and ~hdt strict applicatton of the Zoning Code deprives the property of pri.vileges enjoyed by other properties in the ider~tical zone and classification in the v i cinityJ and f urther granting w~iver (d1 on the basis that granting of the pa r king waiver will not cause an incteasp in trafftc congestion in the ~mmed tate v.icintty nor adversely affect any adjoining land usea and grant~ng of the parking waiver under the condittons imposed, tf any, will not be detrimental to the peac~, health, s~fet,y and general welfare of the ciL•izens of the Cit y oF Anaheim and subject ta Interdepartmental Committee recommendattons; ~nclud i ng the stipulatton that there shall be no outaide entrance tn the addition to the extatir~g structur.e. On roll call, the foceg o ing resolution was passed by the f o1l~wtng vote: AYES: BOUAS, BUSf10RE, FRY, NERBS'P, KING, LA CI,AIRE~ MC BURNEY NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ITEM N0. 9. EIR NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND VARIANCE NO. 3439 PUBGIC HEARING. OWNER: GEORGE T. RAUOUMIS, ET AL., c/o MAPGE GARDENS RECREATION ASSOCIA'"ION, 1621 South Settes Place, Anahe~m, CA 92804. Pcoperty described as an i~regul a rly-shaped parcel of land conststing of approximately 3.2 acres locatpd at th e sout~west rorner of Brownwood Avenue and Valley Stceet, 2176 West Brownwaod Avenue. Waiver of minimum numbe r and type of parking spaces to convert an existing recreation room to a sec urity guard restdence. There was no one indica ting their presence tn oppasiti.on to subject request and althaugh the ataff r eport was not read, it is ceferred to and made a part of the minutes. George Radoumis, owner, was presenE similar request wae appr oved for the street about one year ag o. t o answer an questions and exp'lained a Oakwood Gardens which i.s across the TH~ PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSEB. Jack Wh~.te, Assxstant C ity Attorney, recommended that Condttton I~o, 10 be expanded to include the following sentence: 'krior to issuance of a butlding permit, the owner of the property shall execute and record a covenant in a form appcoved by the Ci ty Attorney's Office agreeing that the converted unit shall be occupie~] exclusively by a security guard and his/her immedtat~ family. Mr. Radoumis s tatec2 he would have no problem with that cond.ition. 12/10/84 __...~.... ..._.. ~.,._.....~.... ,...._ ._ _ ..__. ..__... .. _._ ._._ _ _ _. . .. . ... ... ......_.__ ~ MINUTES, ANANBIM CITY PLANNING CUMMISSYQN, DECEMBBR 12, 1984 84-797 Comm~saionec Ga Claice ~taLed improvemonl:a were proposed on the other approved pro~ect and asked what improvema~ts aca being made on thta pro~ect. Mr. R~doumta stAted t.he property has been vandalized in tho past and they feel this w~ll help to reaolve that problem ond the area will be fenced and .locked for aacurity. CommiASioner La Cla.icd stated she ia concecne~ becauAe this ie the eecond s~ch requuat and was aEraid there wi.ll be more and this is increasing the un~.t count without increasing the pArking. Mr. Radciumis cesponded thnt adequate parking is pcov.ided for khte complex. Commissioner Buahor.e atated he woula go along with th~.s requeat because these are 15 aeparate awnecs and they all own the recreational f.acil{ty And the security guard w.ill serve all theae indtvidual properti.es. ACTION: Commisatoner Kiny offered a motion, seconded by Commtssioner Bouae And MOTION CARRIED that the Anahetm City Plnnn~.ng Commisoton tias revtewe~ the proposal to convert an exiating recreatton room to a securtty guard ceaidence with watver ot m.intmum number and type of parking apaces on an irregularly -shaped parcel of land conai.sttng of aporox~.mately 3.2 acces located on the southwest corner of Hrownwood Avenue and Valley Street and further described as 2176 West e:ownwood Avenue; and does hereby approve the Negat~ve Declaration upon findi.ng that it has c~nsidered Che Negative Declaration toyether wtth Any commenta ceceived duci.ng the public revtew process and further finding on the basts of the Initial Study ~nd any comments rece~ved that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have ~ sign~f.icant eEfect on the environment. Commissioner King offered Resoluti.on No. PC84-260 and moved for ~.ta passage and adopti.on that the Anaheim City Planntng Commiseton does h~reby grant Variance No. 3439 on the basis that the parking waiver wi11 not cause an increase i.n trafftc conqestton in the immediate vic~nity nor adversely affect any ~djoinin9 land uses and grantin9 ot the parking wa~ver under the conditions tmposed, if any, will not be detr.~mental to tne peace, health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City af Anaheim and subject to Interdepactmenc.al Committee recommendaktons including l•he addikion to Cond~tion No. 10 requiring the owner to execute a covenant guarenkeetng that the unit will only be occupied by the ~ecurtty guard and his or her immediate family. On roll call, the foregoing resolutton was passed by the following vote: AYES: BOUAS, BUSHORE, FRY~ HERBST~ KING, LA CLAIRE, MC BURNEX NOES: NONE ABS~NT: NUNE :;TEM N0, 10. EIR N~GATIVE DECLARATION (PR~VIOUSLY A!'PROVED) AND TF.NTATIVE MAP OF TRACT N0. 11210 ~ PUSLIC HEARING. OWNERS: FANNI~ , 6110 East Santa Ana Canyon Road, Anxheim, 4A 92807. AGENT: OCEAn . ~OP~STRUCTION CORPORATION, A7TN: DALE WOOD, 1660 Louise Street, Laguna Beau~~, CA 92651. Property described as an irregularly-shaped patcel oF land consisting of approximately 2.34 acres 12/10/84 MINUTBS. AN~HEIM CITY PLANNlNG COMMISSION, ABCEMBER 12, 1984 84-798 hav.i.ng Approx~mate Erantages of 249 feet on the south aide ~f Santa Ane Canyon Road ~nd 180 feet on the north aide of Acboretum Road and further described as 6110 Eaet Santa Ana Canyon Road. To establiah a 9-lot, 9-unil RS-7200 subdiv.taton. Dale Wood, agent, waa present to anawer any questions. TNE PUHI~IC HFARXNG WAS CLOSED. Jack White, Assistant City Attorney, askcd that the following con~tti.on be added to the approvul: '19. That pcior to final map approval, the requirements set Eorth in Condition Nos. 5, b, 8, 9, .10 and 11 ahall be set focth on the fACe oE the finaa map in a form satisfactory to the City Eng.ineer. Jack White added that the Planning Commission should al~o m~ke ~ finding that the tcact map campliPS wtth the pcovtsion of Government Code Sections 66473.5, 66973.4, 66473.6 and 66473.1. It was n~ted the EI~t Negative Declaration was prevtous.l}~ approved on Novemb~r 26, 1984, in conjunction with Var~ance No. 3440. ACTION: C.ommtssi~ner Kfng offered a m~tion, second~d by Commts~ioner Bouas and MOTION CARRIED, that the Anahetm Ci.ty Planning Commiss~on doe~ hereby find tnat the propo»e~ subdivision, together with its design and improvenent, ts consietent with the City of Anaheim General Plan, pursuant to Government Code Secttons 66473.5, 66473.4, 66473.6 and 66473.1; and does, therefore, approve Tentative Map of Tract No. 11210 for a 9-lot, 9-unit candomintum (Residenttel, Single-~amily, Hills~de, Scenic Corridor Zone) subdivision subject to the following conditions: 1. That prior to final ~ract nap approval, appropriate park and recreation in-lieu fees shall be paid ka the ~ity of Anaheim tn an amount as determined by the City Council. 2. That prior to .issuance of a buildin9 permtt, pri.macy water main fees fihall be paid to the City of Anaheim~ in an amount as determined by the Offfce of the Utilittes General t4anagec. 3. That khe vehicular access rights to Santa Ana Canyon Road and Arboretum Road shall be dedic~ted to the City of Anaheim. 4. That pr~or to final tract map approvalr street names shall be approved by the City Planning Department, 5. That temporary street name signs shall be tnstalled ptior to any occupancy if permanent street name signs have not been installed. 6. That drainage of subject property sha.ll be dtsposed of in a manner satiofactory to the Citx Eng~neer. 7. That should this aubdivision be developed as moxe than one subdtvision, each subdivision thereof ahall be submitted in tentative form for apptoval. 12/10/84 MINUTES, AN~HBIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION, DECEMBBR 12,_ 1984 84-799 8. That all lota with~n this tract shall be served ~y undergc~und uCiltttes. 9. ThAt prior to commencement of structural Eraming, [tre hydrants shall be inatalled and cherged ea required and determined to be necessery by thP Chief of the Fire DepAr4menf:. 10. That ~rior to EinA1 atrcet inHpectiona, "No packing for street aweepi.ng" signa shall be tnstalled ae required by the Street Main~.enance and Sanitation Division and in acc~rdance with specifi.cations on file with satd division. 11. That the sellec~ shall provide the purchosec of each ceatdenti.al dwelltng with wcitten informat•ion concerning Anaheim Municipal Code Sectton 14.32.500 pertaining to "Parking reaCricted to tACtl~tate streek aweeping'. Such written informatton shall clearly i.ndi.cate when on-atreet pa[king is prohibited and the penalty foc vtolati.on. 12. That ceasonable landscaping, includtng irrigation facilities, ahall be installed in the parkway of Santa Ana Canyon Road by the d~velopec, as approved by the Parkway Matntenance Division. AEter inepection and acce~tance by the Parkway N,aintenance Divisi.on, the City oE Anaheim wtll msintatn satd landscaped area. 13. That street ltghttng facilittes alony Santa Ana CAnyon Raad, Acboretum koad and the proposed extension of Baja Drive shall be installed as required by the Utiltties GQneral Manager tn accordance with specificatton~ on ftle in the Office of Utilitiea General Managec, and that security in the form of a bond, certificate of deposit, letter of credtt, oc cash, in an amount and focro satisfactory to the Ctty of Anaheim, shall be posted with the City to guaran~ee the sattsfactory completion oE the ahove-menkioned improvements. Said aecucity ~hall be posted with the City of Anaheim prtor to itnul tcact mAp approval. The above-required tmpruvements shall be installed pXtor to occupancy. 14. That a hammerhead cul-de-sac shall be provi.ded at the westerly proposed term~nus of the e~tended Baja Drive to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Traf£tc Engineer, until such time as a permanent standard cul-de-sac is constructed to the west of subject property; and that security in the fo:m of a bond, certificate of deposit, letter of credit, or cash, in an amount and form satiafactory to the City of Anaheim, shall be posted with the City to guarantee the satisfactory completion of said improvement. Said security shall be posted wtth the City prior to final tcact map approval to guarantee the installakio~ of the above-requ~red improvements pcior to occupancy. 15. That prior to final trar.t map appcoval~ the owner(s) of subject propexty shall dedicate a ten (10) font wide equestrian and hiking trail easement immediately adjacent to Santa Ana Canyon Road and a three (3) foot wtde equestria~ and hiking trail easement immediately adjacent to Arboretum Road to the sat~sfacti.on of the Department of Parks and Recreation. 12/10/84 MINUTES. ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION~ DECEMKER .12._1984 __ 84-800 16. That a barric~de shall be conatructed et the westerly Fropoaed tezminua ai Baja Dri.ve, and a stceet aign indicati~~g "not A thr~ugh atceet' shall be install~d on Ba~a Driva at the intersectton of P~lo Alto Drive to the satisfact~on of the City TraEf~c Engineer1 and that security in the form of a bond, cecttficate o[ deposit, letter of cre~it, or c~sh, in an amount and Eorm satisfactory to the Ci.ty of Anaheim, shnll he paated with the City to guar~ntee the satisfactory completion oF said improvementa. Sa~d security shall be pobted with the City prior to final tract mAp approval to g~aarantee the install~tt~n oE the abovc-r~quircd improvemenCa prior. to occupancy. 17. That pr~or to ~ina.l tract m~p approt~al, perpetual easement(s) for ele~trical purpoaes ~hall be provi.ded. The exact locatton of satd easement(s) shall be determ~ned by Che Electrical Engineering Div~ston. 18. That the existing sidewelk located adjacFnt ta thc n.rth side o£ Arbocetum Road shall. be removed from ttubjeet pcoperty easterly to Quintana Ur~ve, and that a ten (10) £oot wide equestrian and htking tratl, includtng split rufl fenctng, shall bQ installed wher~ not exiating, and modified where ex~ating adjacent to the north atde oE Arbocetum Road from subject property easterl.y to Qutntana Drtve to the satisfactton of the Parks and Recreatton Department= and that seruri.t.y tn the £orm of a bond, certificate of depostt, letter of credit, or. cash, in an amount and form sati.sfactory to the City of Anahe~m, shall be posted with the City to guarantee the sattsfactory completton of satd improvements. Said securi.ty shail be p~ated with Che City pctor to final tract map appcoval, to guarantee the installation of the above-required ~mprovemenis pri.or to occupancy. 19. That prior to final map appcoval, Ghe requi.cements set forth in Condition Nos. 5, 6, 8, 9, 10 and 11 ahal~ be set Eorth on the face of the f~n~l map in a form sati.sfactory to the City Engineer. ITEM N0. 11. EIR NEGATIVE DECI.ARATION (PREV. AP°ROVED) ANU CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 2253 (PREVIOUSLY AAVERTISED) PUBLIC HEARING FAR EXTENSIQN OF TIME. AWNERS: MELVILLE J. McLEAN, 3409 M~raloma Avenue, Anahetm, CA 92806. ~GENT: BEDARD AUTOMOTIVE INC~, 1310 Mfller Street, Anaheim, CA 92807. Propecty descrfbed as an irregularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of approximately 0.92 acre, located north and east of the northeast corner of Miraloma Avenue and Miller Str~et, 1310 North M~ller St~eet (Bedard Automotive). Request for a one-year (2-month retroacti.ve) extension o£ time or deletton of Condition No. 5 of Resolutfon No. PC81-205 pertaining to reyuired extensions aE time to retain an autornobile re~air fac~lity. There was no one ind~cating their pr~sence in opposition to subject c~quest and although the staff repcrt was not read, i.t ia referred to and made a part of the minutes. Chuck Bedard, petitioner, was present to answer any questi.~ns. ~2/10/84 MINUTES, ANAHEIM CITY PGANNING COMMI85ION, DECEMHER 12, 1984 84-801 THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CGOSED. Comm.tssioner Bu~hoce po.inted out thia ta a condittonal ~ae permi.t and even tf the condition l.imit~ng the time ts deleted, the permit could still be revoked if the uRe becomes a nuisance oc detrimental to the neighbors. He also pointed out all work muat be done insi.d~ the facility. ACTION: Commissio~er La Clatre offeced Resolutton No. PC~4-261 and moved for its passage and adoption that the Anahe~in City Planning Commiesion doea hereby delete Condition No. 5 of Reaolution No. PCal-205 pertaining eo the requiced t~me limit to retain an automobile repair facility, on the basis that the uae ts be~ng exercised in a manner not detrimental t~ the pact~cular area and surcound~ng land uses, ~or to the public peoce, health, s~fety and general welfare and pursuant to Sectton 18.03.093.U42 ot :he Zoning Code does heceby f~nd that the deletion of such time lim.itatton ts neceasary to permi.t reasonable operation under the permit or variance as granted. On roll call, the foregotng resolution was passed by the follow~ng vote: AYES: nOUAS, BUSHORE, FRY~ NERBST, KING, LA CLAIRE, MC BURNEY NGES: NONE A9SENT: NONE Mr. Bedard invited the Planning Commission to stop by and see h~s ~acility any time to see that he is keeping it well maintained and that all work is d~ne inside. ITEM N0. 12. R~PORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: A. RF.gU~ST FOR DIRECTION CONCERNING GENBRAL PLAN AMFNDMENT STUDY AREA BOUNllARIES - South side of Vermont Avenue Between Hacbor Boul.evArd and Lemon Street. Jay Tashira, Assoaiate Planner, presEnted the staff repoct indicating that tw~ property owners on the south side o£ Vecmont Avenue have requested a General Plan Amendment changing the cucrent low-medium density residenttal designation to R~edium density residential. ACTION: Commissioner La Claire offeced a motton, seconded by Commissioner. Fry and MOTION CARRIED that the Anaheim City Planning Comrnissxon does hereby direct staff to study and ~etermine whether or not a General Plan Amendment is Appropriate at this time for the areas on khe south s~de of Vermo~~~ Avenue between Harbor. Boulevard and Leinon Street. Mr. Tashiro stated this study ~hould take about two months. Chatrman Herbst stated he felt ample notice should be g.tven to those property owners on the north si,de of Vermont. Mr. Tashiro responded that all property owners withtn 300 feet will be notified and also those property owners whose propert~es would be directly affected will be notif~ed. 12/10/84 MINUTEB, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION, DECEMBER 12. 1984 _ ___ __ 84-902 B. RECLASSIFICATION N0. 79-d0-25 and V~RIANCE N0. 3~.36 - Request from~Ceorge Mason foc a~etroactive extension of time for Reclasstfication No. 79-80-25 and Variance No. 3136. Property locetod southweaker.ly nf Nohl Ranch Roao between the ~nt~r~ecl•ton of Nohl Ranch Roed with Canyon Rim Road and Sercano Avenue, having a max.imum depth of approximately 6,097 feet, appcoximately 2,300 feot eoiathwest oE the aenterli.ne of Cbnyon Rim Roud. ACTION: Comm~sstoner ~cy offered A mo~~on, ~econded by Commissioner K~ng And MOTION CARRIED that the Anaheim Clty Planning Commisaton does heceby gc~nt a three-yenr retroactive extension oE time Eor ReclasstEicati.on No. 79-80-25 and Variance No. 3136 ta expire February 11, 1986. C. PRUPOSED ORDINANCE AMENUING TITLE ]8 'ZONING" - Pertaining to ground-mounted antennae (including satellite dtsh antennae). Annika Santalahtt, Assistant Dtrector f.or zon~ng, reaponded to Commics.ioner Mceurney that staff had c~nstdered what height a satell~te dish antennae cuuld be and not impact the netghbors and that a 6-f~at high block wall ~s permitted by r.fght and if the dist~ ts kept down to that height, there would be no problemt however, anyth~ng above that would requlce a permit. St~e explained this prop~~ed amendment wo~ld only apply to residenttal zones. Jack White, Asststant City Attorney, stated the amendme~~t Fays the dish wi11 be site-screened frorn v~ew from ~ ltne-of-aiyht 6-feet above ground level from any surcoundxng property. Commissioner La Claire clarified that a ground mounted antenna c~uld be any hefght, by right, as long as it ts screened. Jack White fucther clarified that it has to be fn conforman~e wtth the Code of the residential zone which would be 25 to 35-feet high. Jack White stated an addtttonal height limit could be added ko the pcopoaed amendment that in no event shall the height, at the htgheat point, be more than 10 feet, or whatever the Commission desires. Commissionec Fry stated the d.tsh can be aa bi.g as 12 feet in diametar. Commissioner La Claire stated ahe does not like approving anything that Could be bui.lt 25 to 35 feet in the air. Annika Santalahti stated if a pcopecty had buildi~ngs on all sides that are two-stories h~gh and the dish could not be seen, then techntcally it could be 25 feet htgh, but in a yacd where it cou].d be seen, it would riot be perm~tt~d. She stated staff, bX practice, has been allowing these because there have been so few, buk now there have been mare and more requests. Commissioner La Clairz stated she thought some sort of ordtnance is necessary, but that a height limit should be included. She stated she was concecned about areas where people ~ive on alopes because dishes on slopes could be seen by everyone in the whole area. 12/10/84 M,INUTE~ ANANEIM CITX PJ~ANNING COMMISSION. DECEMBER 12y 1964 84-~Q3 Annika Santalahtt staked the Scentc Corridor prohl.bita groun~-m~~unted ankennas, so this would nat ~ppl~~ in that ~rea. 5he ataked thi+a amsndment was brought about by numerc~us requeate from neighbors where unaightly diahea wece installed. Cammias~onar La Clatce etated ahe thought stte acreening ts very tmportant, but felt a height ltmit should be included and ahe Eelt moce otudies should be done becAUSe she dtd not Y,now the siz;e of the dishes, etc. and suggeated the m~tter be poatponed for ;ddi.tional sludy. ACTION; Commissioner La Claire uffeced a motton, aeconded by Commissioner McBurney and MOTION CARRIED that conaideratton of the aforementioned matter be poetponed in order for staff t~ provide addf.tional informAtion. D. RECLASSIFICATIUN Np. 74-75-26 - Requeat Erom Arthur P. Garcia for Amendment to Conditton No. 12 of City Counci,l Reaolutton No. 75R-134 and Cond~tion No. a of. City Council Or~inance No. 3435. Property located at the southwest cornec of Lincoln Avenue and Sunkist Street. Greg Haottngs, Assoctate Planner, explai~ied corrections to the stafE ceport should be made as follows: (1) frecammended cand4t~c~n should be modifi.ed to read: 'That subject propecty shall be developed substanttally in accordance wtth plans and specificaktons on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Reviston No. 3 of Ex,~ibi.t No. 1 and ~xhibits 2 through 5)'; and (2) (Paragcaph 5, second ltne, the word "o~en' ~~ould be changed to "office'. He added the appli.cant has also requested that Condttion Na. 9 of this same ordtnance and Condttton ~~o. 15 of the resolution be amended to read: 'That the hours of operdtton ~hall be from 7:00 a.m. to 12:OC midnight'. Art Gaccta, applicant, Real Estate bepartment, Federated Department Stoces, was present to answer any questfons. Hp alEO explatned the pcoperty will very likely be sold to an insurance company to be ~~sed as a reg~onal office ~nd they feel this would be a better use as far as the surround.tng neighbors are concerned because of. less '~raffic and noise. ACTION: Commissioner King offered a motton, seconded by Commi.ssioner Fry and MOTXON CAkRiED that the Anaheim City Pianning Commission does hereby recommend that the City Council, following a publ~c heartngr amend Conditf.on No. 12 of Ctty Council Resolutton No. 75R-.134 and Condition No. d of Ctty Cc~ncil Ordinance No, 3435 to read ab follows: "That aubject property shall be developed substant~ally in accordan~e with plans and specifications on file wtth the Citx of Anaheim marked Reviston No. 3 of Exh.ib~r No. 1 and ~xhibit Nos. 2 thcuugh 5; and further amending Condition No. 9 of Ordinance No. 3435 and Condttion No. 15 of Resolution 75R-134 as follows: "That the houcs of operatton shall be from 7:OQ a.m. to 12:00 m~dnight." 12/1Q/84 MINUTEB. ~NAHEIM CITY PL~NNING COMMISSION, DBCEMBER_12. 19s4 ____ __ A4-904 E. VARIANCE N0. 3429- Nuna Pro Tunc resolutton am~nd~ng legal deacriptton of Reaolut~on No. PC84-207 granted to permit a 24-unit affordable apartment complex at 205 - 211 Soiath Ohio Street. ACTION: Comm~s$~oner Fry offered Reaolutton No. PC84-262 and maved for ~ts passage and adoptton thet the Anahe~m City Planning Commisaion doea heceby grant a nunc pro tunc cesclut~on containing the complete legal descr~pt~on amending PC84-207 4ranted in connect~on with Veciance No. 3429. On roll call, the foregoing resolut.lon was passed by the follow~ng vote: AYES: BUUAS, BUSHORE~ ~RY~ H~RBST~ KING~ LA CLAIRE, MC BURN~Y NUBS: NONE ABSENT: NONE ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner rry oEf~c~d a mot.ton, seconde~ by Comm~ssioner King and MOTION CARRIED that th~ meeting be adjourned. The meettng was adjourned at 4;00 p.m. Respectfully submitted, ~~~ ~ ~~~r~.. Edtth L. Elarris~ Secretary Anaheim C~ty Planntng Commtssion ELH:lm 0094m 12/10/84