Loading...
Minutes-PC 1989/12/04~aq y~~ K ~ ( ~ ~ ~.` :t 'F ACTION AGENDA REGULAR MEETING OF THB ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION MONDAY, DECEMBER 4, 1989, AT 9:00 A.M. 9:00 A.M.: WORK SESSION - ELECT. UTILITIES UNDERGROUND CONVERSION, GORDON HOYT 10:00A.M.: PRESENTATION FROM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PERTAINING TO THE STATUS OF THE BROORHURST PROJECT AT NORTHEAST CORNER OF BROOKHURST STREET AND CRESCENT AVENUE. 10:15 A.M.: PRELIMINARY PLAN REVIEW 1:30 P.M.: PUBLIC HEARING (PUBLIC TESTIMONY) PROCEDURE TO EXPEDITE PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. The proponents in applications which are not contested will have five minutes to present their evidence. Additional time will be granted upon request if, in the opinion of the Commission, such additional time will produce evidence important to the Commission's consideration. ~" 2. In contested applications, the proponents and opponent will each be ~~r°~ 3. Staff Reports are part of the evidence deemed received by the Commission in each hearing. Copies are available to the public prior to the meeting. 4. The Commission will withhold questions until the public hearing is closed. ~~ ''" given ten minutes to present his case unless additional time is requested and the complexity of the matter warrants. The Commission's considerations are not determined by the length of time a participant speaks, but rather by what he says. 5. The Commission reserves the right to deviate from the foregoing if, in its opinion, the ends of fairness co all concerned will be served. 6. All documents are presented to the Planning Commission for review in connection with any hearing, including photographs or other acceptable visual representations of non-documentary evidence, shall be retained by the Commission for the public record and shall be available for public inspections. 7. At the end of the scheduled hearings, members of the public will be allowed to speak on items of interest which are within the jurisdiction of the Planning Commission, and/or agenda items. Each speaker will be allotted a maximum of five (5) minutes to speak. 0643b Page 1 ~1 la. ENVIRGNMENTAL IMPACT REPORT N0. 289 Recommend `t'~''' Certification y+t:. lb. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT N0. 271 Approved lc. RECLASSIFICATION N0. 89-90-22 Granted ld. WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT Granted le. CONDITIONAL USE PERN,IT N0. 3206 Granted lf. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT N0. 83-02 (AMENDED & RESTATED) Approved lg. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT N0. 89-02 Continued to 12-18-89 lh. REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL P.EVIEW OF lc, ld AND le Approved OWNERS: SAVI RANCH ASSOCIATES, C/0 HILLMAN PROPERTIES, 450 Newport Center Drive, Suite 304, Newport Beach, CA 92660 AGENT: CSF, 1717 S. State College Boulevard, Suite 100, Anaheim, CA 92806 LOCATION: 1001 to 1100 Pullman Street PORTION A: ML (SC) to CL (SC) PORTION B: RS-A-43,000 (SC) to CL. (SC) Request for amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan proposing a redesignation from the existing General Industrial and General Open Space designations to a General Commercial designation to permit and govern the construction of a commercial retail center, :: ~;,, an automotive repair center, two freestanding restaurants with on-sale and consumption of alcoholic beverages and entertainment, one drive-through restaurant and a theatre with building heights in excess of 35 feet with waivers of minimum number of parking spaces, required site screening and required landscaped setback. Request for amendment and restatement of Development Agreement No. 83-02 between SAVI Ranch Associates and the City of Anaheim; and approval ~f Development Agreement No. 89-02 between Marketfaire Partners and the City of Anaheim. Continued from the November 6, and November 20, 1989 Planning Commission meetings. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT RESOLUTION N0. PC89-292 RECLASSIFICATION RESOLUTION N0. PC89-293 ~~ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION N0. PC89-294 Page 2 12/4/89 ,,..,~ ~ a":.a; FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. 0PPOSITION: 1 Person Present OPPOSITION CONCERNS: Opposed to theater use, theater screens overbuilt. PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Competition is not the issue but land use is, two major users, (Coseo and Home Club); City would help finance Weir Canyon Road widening even for industrial uses. STAFF COMMENTS: Attorney: stated GPA would become effective on the date developer enters into Agreement with the City. Trai'.fic Engineer: Parking behind the row of retail stores will be underutilized, creating parking shortage in the main retail area. Recommended building relocated closer to freeway or eliminate theater. That area should be employee parking. Public Works: concerned because did not have adequate time to review Development Agreement. Planning: Agreement negotiated by City Manager's Office - staff reviewed draft and provided input pity Manager Admin. - Economic Development and City Manager's Office negotiated for owner's participation agreement, City's involvement has been to encourage the "big box" users, over 100,000 sq. ft. retailer; attempts to be competitive with surrounding cities; limited time for review because of time schedule of large retailers, City's financial ~„~ involvement limited to traffic and circulation improvements. COMMISSIONER'S COMMENTS: Herbst - questioned parking, public will park where it is most convenient; are shops double sided, thought building could be rearranged; suggested moving building back to second row of parking. (Petitioner thought moving building would encourage theater goers to park in front of shops. Felt staff should have adequate time for review to give Commission their input. Until sign program is presented, electronic reader bard should be eliminated. Scenic Corridor has more stringent restrictions - No detailed landscape plans. PETITIONER: Wanted to keep parking separated - did not want theater patrons parking in front of shops. Opening at eastern edge of site could be closed or be an "exit" only. Need to direct users to that parking area with proper signs; grade change in tkiat area with slight incline from parking to theater, pedestrian accessway through the center. Agreed to close eastern opening and provide signing at the corner. Page 3 12/4/89 (a) Rec. Certification of EIR No. 209 (7 yes votes) (b) Rec. Adoption of GPA 271 (7 yes votes) (c) Granted Waiver (5-2) (Herbst & Messe voted no) (d) Granted CUP No. 3206 (7 yes votes) (e) Development Agreement 83-02 (Restated & Amended) (5-2) (Feldhaus & Hellyer abstained} (f) Continued Development Agreement 89-02 to 12-18-89 on the basis Commission did not receive a copy of Development Agreement for review. Bouas suggested sending it to City Council with information that Commission did not review Agreement. Attorney - finding would have to be based on analysis and summary only. Request for City Council review of lc, ld, and le. Page 4 12/4/89 1 ~.-~ 2a. CEQA NEGATIVE DECLARATION (READVERTISED) Approved 2b. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT N0. 272 (READVERTISED) Denied 2c. RECLASSIFICATION N0. 89-90-23 (READVERTISED) Denied 2d. WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT (READVERTISED) Denied 2e. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 3214 (READVERTISED) Denied 2f. REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL REVIEW OF 2c, 2d AND 2e No Action OWNER: JAFAR JAHANPANAH, 520 N. Rexford Drive, Beverly Hills, CA 90210 AGENT: RONALD J. CROWLEY, 1700 Raintree Rd., Fullerton, CA 92635 LOCATION: 1585 West Katella Avenue RS-10,000 to RM-2400 Request for amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan proposing a redesignation from the existing Commercial Professional designation to the Low-Medium Density Residential designation. To permit a 24-unit, RM-2400 condominium complex with waivers of: a. maximum structural height (denied) b. minimum building setback (denied) c. minimum recreational-leisure area (denied) d. maximum fence height (denied - deleted by revised plans)) Continued from the November 6, 1989 Planning Commission meeting. ~a~ ~'~~'"~ GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT RESOLUTION N0. PC89-295 _ J;/~~'~ ''/ RECLASSIFICATION RESOLUTION N0. PC89-296 ~ `1~c~~-C/ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION N0. PC89-297 ~if~ V ' ~ K/ FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. OPPOSITION: 2 people present. OPPOSITION CONCERNS: Neighbors north, been opposed to developments on this property for 11 years, and have now worked out some compromises with this developer and would rather see condominiums than apartments; do not want balconies overlooking their back yards; want 8-foot high wall. PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: 28-foot wide private street, with 3-foot wide sidewalks, was not aware line of sight exhibits were necessary; suggested condition being imposed to guarantee condominiums rather than apartments Page 5 12/4/89 . . ,,,mg COMMISSION COMMENTS: Did not want waivers to RM-2400 condominium ,9,?; °^.; ordinances; recreational-leisure area not adequate; should redesign and eliminate number of units, and request nn waiver.; needs more landscaping and open space; no hardship for granting waivers, rectangularly-shaped parcel, just overbuilding property; rezoning to RM -2400 does not guarantee development of condominiums and apartments could be built. General Plan Amendment should be for the whole area. Bouas - suggested reducing number of bedrooms, or talking with developer ~f adjacent properties to combine for a similar project. No hardship for granting waivers. Hellyer- this type development is needed in Anaheim and he would consider parking waiver rather than reducing number of units. STAFF COMMENTS: Traffic - security gates not planned. Planning - could build apartments if property rezoned. ACTION: GPA Denied (4-3) (Bouas, Hellyer, Feldhaus voting no) Reclass. Denied (6-1) (Feldhaus voting No) Waivers Denied (~-2) (,Feldhaus & Hellyer voting No) CUP Denied (5-2) (Feldhaus b Hellyer voting No) Page 6 12/4/89 ~- ,~?~ 3a. CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION .~ 3b. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT N0. 273 3c. RECLASSIFICATION N0. 89-90-26 3d. VARIANCE N0. 4004 3e. REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL REVIEW OF 3c AND 3d OWNER: WILLIAM TOKAR, ATTN: PARRY DEVELOPMENT CO., 760 N. Euclid Avenue, #103, Anaheim, CA 92801 LOCATION: 952 South Anaheim Boulevard CL to RM-1200 or a less intense zone. Petitioner requests an amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan proposing a redesignation from the existing General Commercial designation to a Medium Density Residential designation (a Low-Medium Density Residential designation will also be considered) to construct an 8-unit, 2-story, apartment building with waivers of maximum structural height, minimum recreational/leisure area, minimum floor area of dwelling unit and maximum lot coverage. Continued from the November 20, 1989 Planning Commission meet/i~ng. ~, ~ GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT RESOLUTION N0. PC89-298 U./' "~ i~ RECLASSIFICATION RESOLUTION NO. PC89-299 !/~~ ~-~ =~~i VARIANCE RESOLUTION N0. PC89-300 /l~ ~- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINCiES. OPPOSITION: 5 people present OPPOSITION CONCERNS: Residential neighbors opposed to two stories. One person indicated he was currently negotiating with purchaser of subject property, owner of the nursery, and property owners of two parcels just east and would like commercial development. Zone change would affect property values. (It was noted subject property and the nursery property are currently zoned RS 10,000 and 3 properties to the east are zoned commercial). Commercial on the corner and this would set precedent for apartments, no place for tenants to wash their vehicles, no place for children to play; current problems with excessive traffic in alley. PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Presented revised plans, relocated parking spaces and spaces are for standard vehicles. Less traffic with residential use than with commercial. Would eliminate congestion, eliminate curb cuts. Page 7 12/4/89 Approved Denied Denied Denied No Action V _ ..,,..nn R .. - eM it tr ~. ~,. ~... ~~i .. tit ~ ~7 ,~~ COMMISSION COMMENTS: Herbst - would prefer to look at entire block and „~~ not just this area; appears to be more residential than commercial but this would be spot zoning, with residential be between two commercial uses. Bouas - felt all of Anaheim Boulevard will become commercial in the future. ACTION: GPA Denied (7 yes votes) Reclass. Denied (7 yes votes) Variance Denied (7 yes votes) 4a. CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION 4b. VARIANCE N0. 3993 OWNER: LESLIE CROWELL AND ARLENE CROWELL, P.O. Box 1728, Lucerne Valley, CA 92354 LOCATION: 1110 1112 and 1114 West Pearl Street Waivers of (a) minimum number of parking spaces, (b) minimum site area per dwelling unit, (c) maximum structural height and (d) minimum side yard to construct, a 4-story, 12-unit apartment building. Continued from the October 9, November 6, and November 20, 1989 Planning Commission meetings. VARIANCE RESOLUTION N0. Page 8 12/4/89 ,tinned to 1/3/90 ~'~~ 7 ,.-~ 5a. CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION (PREVIOUSLY APPROVED) ..„e 5b. -?1~rR'37~Q'CS'-NO 1564 (READVERTISED) C~cr~ OWNER: HUISH FAMILY FUN CENTERS, INC., ATTN: COURT HUISH, 33208 Paseo Cerveza, Suite C, San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 LOCATION: 1041 North Shepard Street To consider revised plans to include construction of a miniature golf course, maze field and battle tanks and relocation of parking spaces for a previously-approved amusement center. Continued from the November 6, and November 20, 1989 Planning Commission meetings. RESOLUTION N0. PC89-301 --------------- FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. OPPOSITION: None PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Remodel existing facilities - no expansion into adiacent vacant lot. Want to work with the City and contacted the ~y P~,lice Department and there have been no problems. Only had 3 phone "~ calls to PD in 3 years COMMISSION COMMENTS: Teenagers working there have problems controlling their peers. STAFF COMMENTS: TRAFFIC- Parking lot could be restriped to accommodate parking needs. POLICE - Problem is with cruisers, but not the patrons of the Fun Center; Police Department is attempting to deal with cruising problem on a routine basis; reserve officers perform taffic control activities on weekends; gang activity problems in par;:ing lot have been resolved because they are now charging nominal fee For parkir..g and patrons are not allowed to sit the vehicles in the lot. CODE ENFORCEMENT: 3 incidents in 4 years; and no violations have been issued; graffiti complaints from PD & other agencies. ACTION: Approved remodeling of facility, subject to restriping of parking lot satisfactory to the City Traffic Engineer, and including conditions listed in the staff report. VOTE: 7 yes votes Page 9 12/4/89 Approved Granted "C . ~ I 1 6a. CEQA NEGATIVE DECLARATION `~1 'h~~~ 6b. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT N0. 278 OWNER: NEWPORT FEDERAL, 5000 Birch Street, Suite 6100, ATTN: WILLIAM 0. COTTLE, Newport Beach, CA 92660 AGENT: CITY OF ANAHEIM, CIVIC CENTER, RM. 162, P.O. Box 3222, Anaheim, CA 92803 LOCATION: Property is approximately 45 acres located southeast of Ball Road and the Route 57-Orange Freeway, west of the Santa Ana River and north of the Southern Pacific Railroad tracks. Request for amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan proposing a redesignation from the existing General Industrial to General Commercial. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT RESOLUTION N0. PC89-302 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. OPPOSITION: None ~~ ACTION: Granted .;.,.~ VOTE: 7 yes votes ^! Page 10 12/4/89 °r ;: C ~ 7a. CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION 7b. RECLASSIFICATION N0. 89-90-31 OWNER: NEWPORT FEDERAL, 5000 Birch Street, Suite 6100, ATTN: WILLIAM 0. COTTLE, Newport Beach, CA 92660 LOCATION: 1380 Sanderson Avenue ML to CL RECLASSIFICATION RESOLUTION N0. PC89-303 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. OPPOSITIGN: Nor_e STAFF COMMENTS: Revised conditions, fees pertaining to existing building and sidewalk along the cul de sac on Sanderson; potential use of existing 37,000 sq.ft. building, amended Cond. #3 to permit office uses of existing bldg. & covenant to be recorded to guarantee any additions would not be permitted to have office uses; no significant traffic increase; existing horse stable use is permitted under existing CUP approved by the County and is permitted regardless of zoning. ~~ ACTION: Approved Negative Declaration ~•b„. Granted Reclassification, with revised conditions. VOTE: 7 yes votes roved i ~~ Page 11 12/4/89 , ~;,, ,`; _ ,~ ~ 8a. CEUA CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION CLASS 3 `" Sb. VARIANCE N0. 4008 OWNER: GEROLDINE JEWELL EXECUTOR, ESTATE OF ALFRED STECHERT, 6111 E. Via Sabia, Anaheim, CA AGENT: MICHAEL FRAIZER, 18200 ~rba Linda Boulevard, X201, Yorba T:inda, CA 92686 LOCATION: 6111 E. Via Sabia Waiver of minimum lot width to establish a 3-lot subdivision. VARIANCE RESOLUTION N0. PC89-304 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOZ TO BE CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. OPPOSITION: 3 people present; 1 letter submitted OPPOSITION CONCERNS: Concerned about additional access openings onto cul c'e sac (Via Sabia); suggested taking property from one larger parcel for access; requested heavy equipment and construction vehicles not be permitted on Via Sabia, and indicated smoke, dust and noise were concerns. Previous owner designed lots in this fashion in order to have +1, larger lot for himself and ravine was not an issue. .^ry PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Agreed to one access on Via Sabia, property owner designed lot splits before his death; impossible to put road on property line between lots because of deep ravine, grade difference between the three lots. COMMISSION COMMENTS: Grading equipment and construction vehicles could enter the site if all developed at same time. Would want guarantee that only one access would be added to Via Sabia, with Lots 1 and 2 taking access from Montenara. ACTION: Granted, sabject to stipulation to have only one access to Via Sabia, revised plans to be approved by the Planning Department, and no construction vehicles or heavy equipment permitted on Via Sabia. VOTE: 7 yes votes Page 12 12/4!39 anted wXTRSKfiiip 4!'.'•.+kC]1'f{`~'„~` py .... :.,. .. ., ;~., . .: .: r •X`,1~.~ ~., ... ~ 9a. CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION ~';,,~ 9b. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 3218 OWNER: DOMINIC C. ETCHANDY, 1241 N. Lakeview, Suite H, Anaheim, CA 92807 AGENT: ROBERT D. MICKEL50N, 328 N. Glassell, Orange, CA 92666 LOCATION: 1241 N. Lakeview Avenue Suite A To permit industr3.ally related retail sales in the ML zone. CONDITIONAL USE PERbfIT RESOLUTION N0. PC89-305 --------------------- ________ FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMM=SIGN ACTION. NOT TO BE CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. OPPOSITION: None PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Averaged less than two retail sales a month, primarily warehousing and distribution. COMMISSION COMMENTS: Why did Redevelopment Commission recommend denial? (Sta£~ explained Redevelopment Plan does not allow retail sales ~, with industrial use.) ~"'"y ACTION: Approved Negative Declaration Granted VOTE: (6-1) Feldhaus voted no pproved ranted ~~ Page 13 12/4!89 n /'~ 10a. CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION ';`;;~ lOb. CONDITIONAL USE PERh;IT iQO. 3221 OWNER: LD & B CALIFORNIA Gr~NERAL PARTNERSHIP, CANYON PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER, ATTN: ESSEX REALTY MANAGEMENT CO., 18022 Cowan, Suite 202B, Irvine, CA 92714 AGENT: M. E. TURANO. 18112 Lantana Street, Yorba Linda, CA 92F8$ LOCATION: 5701 East Santa Ana Canyon Rd To Hermit a veterinary clinic. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION NO. PC89-306 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. OPPOSITION: None ACTION: Granted VOTE: 7 yes votes 1 '~~ d ice; Page 14 12/4!89 ,~ lla. CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION %~ llb. WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT llc. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 3219 OWNER: IMPERIAL PROPERTIES, 4188 Pullman Avenue, Costa Mesa, CA 92626 AGENT: RICHARD ORNSTEIN, C/0 COLDWELL BANKER RESIDENTIAL REAL ESTATE, 2475 N. Tustin Avenue, Orange, CA 92665 LOCATION: 5753 Santa Ana Canvon Road, Suite "A" To permit a gourmet take-out restaurant with outdoor seating and on-sale beer and wine. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION N0. PC89-307 ------------------------- FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. OPPOSITION: None STAFF COMMENTS: Traffic: There is a shortage of parking in this center, but only in horseshoe area in front of Albertsons, but no shortage in front of proposed restauant so there is adequate parking for this use. d -' ACTION: Granted VOTE: 7 yes votes anted r/ ~~~ Page 15 12/4/89 i 12 a. C~ A NEGATIVE DECLARATION ie . "~ 12b. Y,AIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT 12c. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 3220 OWNER: LARRY R. SMITH, 17046 Marina Bay Drive, Huntington i?ta^ch, CA 92649 ,~ AGENT: SPONGBERG, KIRKLAND AND AS`~:;CIA.T_ES, INC., ATTN: GAYLE ACKERMAN, 11409 Carson Street, Lakewood, CA 90715 LOCATION: 919-959 S. Knott Street To permit ~n expansion of a commercial retail center and a drive-through restaurant with waivers of: a. minimum number of parking spaces (granted) b. minimum distance between buildings (granted) c. required site screening (granted) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION N0. PC39-308 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. OPPOSITION: None ~`, PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Rehabilitation plans very similar to plans approved in 1988, but just one fast food restaurant rather than 2; need CUP in order to separate the commercial building into individual tenant spaces and to allow some food uses which would be limited and there would be no sit down restaurants. Asked if architecture could be changed to one they have just recently finished at Euclid & Century in Garden Grove. ACTION: Granted VOTE: 7 yes votes Page 16 12/4/89 ~, ~'~ ~ ~ + s,. 13 a. CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION _ 13b. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT N0. 274-1 2. Approved 13 c. RECLASSIFICATION NO 89-90 27 3 AND 4 ~~ ;,u••,1^~:.n,ti:,(Le: e'-Appro 13 d. REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL REVIEW OF 3c Granted a,.........., a INITIATED BY THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, 200 S. Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, CA 92805 GPA 274-1: LOCATION: Property is approximately i.38 acres generally bounded by South Street to the north, Anaheim Boulevard to the east, Valencia Avenue to the south and Lemon Street to the east, excepting the northerly 330 feet and the easterly 160 feet. RE UEST: A City initiated amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan redesignating subject area from the Medium Density Residential designation to the Low-Medium Density Residential designation. GPA 274-2: LOCATION: Property is approximately 2.7 acres generally bounded by Valencia Avenue to the north, Anaheim Boulevard to the east, Vermont Avenue to the south and Lemon Street to the west, excepting the easterly 160 feet and the southerly 230 feet. REQUEST: A City initiated amendment to the Land Use Element of the ~'~ General Plan redesignating subject area from the Medium Density '""~ Residential designation to the Low-Medium Density Residential designation. GPA 274-3: LOCATION: Property is approximately 10.7 acres generally bounded by Valencia Avenue to the north, Olive Street to the east, Vermont Avenue to the south and the alley east of AnaY.~eim Boulevard to the west. REQUEST: A City initiated amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Pla:i redesignating subject area from the Medium Density Residential designation to the Low-Medium Density Residential designation. GPA 274-4: LOCATION: Property is approximately 21.3 acres generally bounded by Vermont Avenue to the north, Olive Street to the east, Clifton Avenue to the south and Anaheim Boulevard to the west, excluding those properties which front on Anaheim Boulevard or Clifton Avenge. Also excluding those 2 parcels of land having a combined frontage of approximately 203 feet on th east side of Philadelphia Street, a maximum depth of approximately 99 feet and located approximately 122 feet south of the centei•li,:e of Charlotte Avenue. REQUEST: A City initiated amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan redesignating subject area from the Medium Density `~' Residential designation to the Low Density Residential designation. Page 17 12/4/89 ;: -, ,~ RECLASSIFICATION N0. 89-90-27: The area generally bounded by Valencia Avenue to the north, Olive Street to the east, Vermont Avenue to the south and the alley west of Philadelphia street to the west. Also including that parcel of land having a frontage of approximately 50 feet on the east side of Lemon Street, having a maximum depth of approximately 243 feet and located approxima~~ly 165 feet north of the centerline of Valencia Avenue. RECLASSIFICATION N0. 89-90-27: A City initiated reclassification of properties from the nM-1200 (Residential, Multiple-Family) Zore to the RM-2400 (Residential., Multiple-Family) or a less intense Zone. ~ %~ GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 'CVO. 274-1 RESOLUTION N0. PC89-309 • , vv ~~'~! GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT N0. 274-2 RESOLUTION N0. PC89-310 ~ '~~'-'~-`' GENERAL PLAN AMENDI`fENT N0. 274-3 RESOLUTION NO. PC89-311 tl ',.:,1•At- , ~~ GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT N0. 274-4 RESOLUTION N0. PC89-312 ~(=-!~L- RECLASSIFICATION RESOLUTION N0. PC89-313 ~~ ~~ FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF T1:iE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. I,,:sy OPPOSITION: 1 person present, in opposition and 1 person present in _,, favor. OPPOSITION CONCERNS: Affects property values, felt area at Claudina and Philadelphia should remain a high density area. SUPPORT COMMENTS: Felt single-family neighborhoods should be preserved. STAFF COMMENTS: Some properties to the north on Valencia are zoned RM 1200. Will be included in future hearing. ACTION: Recommended Approval of GPA 274-1, 2, 3 & 4 Granted Reclas~.ification Recommended City Council Review of Reclassification. VOTE: (6 yes votes) (Boydstun - conflict of interest). 4 Page 18 12/4/89 F"^I 14a. CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION 14b. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT N0. 275 S 5 INITIATED BY THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, 200 S. Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, CA 92805 LOCATION: Property is approximately 2 acres, consisting of those 9 parcels fronting or. the east and west sides of Dwyer Place. Also including 2 parcels beginning on the northeast corcer of Pearl Street and Dwyer Place, having combined approximate frontages of 136 feet on the north side of Pearl Street and 90 feet on the east side of Dwyer Street. A City initiated amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan redesignating subject area from the Medium Density Residential designation to the Low-Medium Density designation. ~/~ GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT i2ESOLUTION N0. PC89-314 i'" l~ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. OPPOSITION: None SUPPORT: 1 person present ACTION: Approved Negative Declaration Recommended Approval of GPA 275 VOTE: 7 yes votes "~?'~FS~ approved tee. Approval 'sxhibit A Page 19 12/4/89 '~ r-` 15. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: ~~ ~w.,l A. VARIANCE NO 3782 - REQUEST FOR RETROACTIVE EXTENSION OF TIME TO COMPLY WITH CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: Farzad Yaganeh, requests a retroactive extension of time for property located at the southeast corner of La Palma Avenue and Anna Drive. ~- ~-~`!~ ~ ~X~~if~e B. PROPOSAL FOR B.I.A. - ADMINISTERED UNIFORM DIRECTIONAL SIGN PROGRAM. C. ORANGE COUNTY GENERAL SERVICES AGENCY - REQUEST TO DETERMINE CONFORMANCE WITH THE GENERAT, PLAN: Property is located at 280 East Lincoln Avenue (Anaheim Senior Center). D. ORANGE COUNTY GENERAL SERVICES AGEI7CY - REQUEST TO DETERMINE CONFORMANCE WITH THE GENERAL PLAN: Property is located at 1800 West Ball Road (West Anaheim Senior Center). E. ORANGE COUNTY GENERAL SERVICES AGENCY - REQUEST TO DETERMINE CONFORMANCE WITH THE GENERAL PLAN: Property is located at 1601 East Orangewood Avenue. F. REQUEST FROM ORANGE OUNTY FOR A DETERMINATIOIJ THAT THE PROPOSED ItdPROVEMENT OF THE PLACENTIA RETARDING BASIN FACILITY BO1B04) IS IN CONFORMITY WITH THE ADOPTED G~'NERAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM. ` ~/ ~,e,~, rt_,,, c ~ OTHER ACTIONS: I .I i s 1 ,~ 1 J r. Instructed staff to request a joint meeting with the City Council, Public Utilities Commission and Planning Commission to discuss conversion of overhead to underground utilities. Page 20 12/4/89 approved tea; t I.,i r~ ~U../ Rec. Approval to permit 12 signs, subj. to approval Traffic Eng. Eliminating #s 2, 5, & 7. Approved . Approved Approved Approved ~~ _:~~ 'i.'~. 3. FGe:v. _':: ~ .. /~ ADJOURNMENT TO MEETING OF DECEMBER 13 1989 TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING: ~~ la. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT N0. 299 lb. RECLASSIFICATION N0. 89-90-29 lc. WAIVFR OF CODE REQUIREMENT ld. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 3224 le. REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL REVIEW OWNERS: ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT, PAUL LAWRENCE AND KAREN J. ROOT, CLAYTON GRAY AND GRACE AMANDA SCARBROUGH, 400 Civic Center Drive West, Santa Ana, CA 92701 PAUL LAWRENCE AND KAREN J. ROOT, 1210 Polaris Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 PHOENIX CLUB GERMAN ASSOCIATION OF ORANGE COUNTY, A CORPORATION, 1566 S. Douglass Road, Anaheim, CA 92806 LOCATION: Propertv is a,~proximate_y 26 acres located north and east of the northeast corner of Katella Avenue and Douglass Road. RS-A-43,000, RS-A-43,000(FP), ML and ML(FP) to PR & PR(FP) on the westerly approximately 9 acres. To permit a parking area to be accessory to a multi-purpose sports facili*_y with waiver of maximum fence height on the easterly approximately 17 acres. RECLASSIFICATION RESOLUTION N0. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION N0. i ~~ Page 21 ".~ ~'~ 12/4/89 ~i ~. / y djourned to eeting of 2/13/89 at :30 p.m. • `~:.