Minutes-PC 1990/04/23ACTION
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
MONDAY, APRIL 23, 1990, AT 10:00 A.M.
PRELIMINARY PLAN REVIEW
PUBLIC HEARING
(PUBLIC TESTIMONY)
9:00 A.M. - 10:00 A.M. - Continuation of CR Work Session
of April 10, 1990.
10:00 A.M.
1:30 P.M.
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: BGUAS, BOYDSTUN, FELDHAUS, HERBST, MC BURNEY
MESSE
COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: HELLY':.R
Minutes approved: February 12, 1990, February 26, 199n and
March 26, 1990
PROCEDURE TO EXPEDITE PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. The proponents in applications which are not contested will have five
minutes to present their evidence. Additional time will be granted upon
,,-.. .request if, in the opinion of the Commission, such additional time will
V produce evidence important to the Commission's consideration.
2. In contested applications, the proponents and opponent will each be given
ten minutes to present his case unless additional time is requested and
the complexity of the matter warrants. The Commission's considerations
are not determined by the length of. time a participant speaks, but rather
by what he says.
3. Staff Reports are part of the evidence deemed received by the Commission
in each hearing. Copies are available to the public prior to the meeting.
4. The Commission will withhold questions until the public hearing is closed.
5. The Commission reserves the right to deviate from the foregoing if, in
its opinion, the ends of. fairness to all concerned will be served.
6. All documents are presented to the Planning Commission for review in
connection with any hearing, including photographs or other acceptable
visual representations of non-documentary evidence, shall be retained by
the Commission for the public record and shall be available for public
inspections.
7. At the end of the scheduled hearings, members of the public will be
allowed to speak on items of interest which are within the jurisdiction
of the Planning Commission, and/or agenda items. Each speaker will be
allotted a maximum of five (5) minutes to speak.
~~
0764b
Page 1
i":?i<fy
,y;
la. CEOA NEC,ATIVE DECLARATION
lb. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO 297 (READVERTISED)
lc. RECLASSIFICATION NO 89-QO 50 (READVERTISED)
ld. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 3252 (READVERTISED)
S4
OWNER: JEROME MARKS TRUST, SiiERRIE ROBERT MARKS TRUST 1080 Park
Newport, Newport Beach, CA 92660
LOCATION: 2144 W. Lincoln Avenue. Property is approximately 5.76
acres located on the south side of Lincoln Avenue
approximately 102 feet west of the centerline of Empire
Street.
Request for amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan
proposing a redesignation of the northerly 1.21 acres of subjeci:
property having frontage on Lincoln Avenue (Portion A) and the
southerly 4.55 acres of subject property (Portion B) from the
respective existing General Commercial and Low-Medium Density
Residential designations to the Medium Density Residential
designation.
(Portion A) CL to RM-1200 or a less intense zone and (Portion B) PD-~
to RM-1200 or a less intense zone.
To permit a 3-story, 202-unit deck-type housing apartment complex
Continued from the March 26, 1990, Planning Commission meeting.
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMEiT RESOLUTION N0.
RECLASSIFICATION RESOLUTION N0.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0.
~...~
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY CF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MIIv'UTES.
ACTION: Continued to 6/18/90 - to be readvertised
VOTE: 5 yes - (Commissioners Bouas and Hellyer absent)
~~s1r;;::,;, -:
ontinued to
/18/90 to be
eadvertised
~; t~';J
,1~ ~
j 1.1..(i
4/23%90
Page No. 2
I
2a. CEQA MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATIOid
2b. WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT
r"~ 2C. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 3258
OWNER: CONESTOGA PARTNERS, 1240 S. Walnut Street, Anaheim, CA
92121
AGENT: PHILLIP R. SCHWARTZE, 14841 Yorba, #203, Tustin, CA 92680
LOCATION: 1240 South Walnut Street. Property is approximately 6.4
acres located on the south side of Ball Road and on the
east side of Walnut Street, approximately 340 feet east
and 345 feet south of the intersection of Ball Road and
Walnut Street.
To permit a vacation ownership resort with waiver of minimum number
of parking spaces.
Continued from the April 9, 1990 Planning Commission meeting.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION N0. _ PC90-93
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
r-~, OPPOSITION: 5
OPPOSITION CONCERNS: Not opposed to project but opposed to shortfall in
parking and traffic. Buses to LAX start at 4:OOa.m. and the buses brake
in front of their homes. Have concerns over responses to initial EIR.
Parking is generally not a problem because most people will not have cars.
PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: They meet all new and existing Codes; this will
be upgraded to a class A hotel; asked for a reduction in the Transient
Occupancy tax from 309, to 209,; could have an ordinance to preclude buses
from parking along Walnut. Would like to have more landscaping then what
Code requires and 14 fewer parking spaces.
COMMISSION COMMENTS: Try to eliminate noise from buses in the morning;
should not allow buses to stage on Walnut Street; problem with buses
pulling in under the Porte cochere and loading and unloading in the
mornings. Four to 5-foot berm should be installed along Walnut street;
air pollution should be solved by new ordinance.
STAFF COMMENTS: Paul Singer, City Traffic Engineer, stated by relocating
the lobby to Ball Road, some reduction of to~:.r buses may be anticipated.
The actual destination of the tour buses is the CR area; they will most
likely travel westbound on Ball Road and try to make a left-turn into the
project and this is not practical; they will enter Walnut Street and
enter the project on the northern driveway on Walnut Street and pick-up
passengers at the L-shaped driveway and then exit on Ball Road. The pork
chop island on the southerly driveway on Walnut Street will not be very
effective.
Approved
Approved
Granted
4/23/90
Page No. 3
Nancy Ferguson, Planning, stated their impression was that air pollution
and noise came from the staging problem off-site. The applicant assured
`"' them the number of buses that would be pulling into the Conestoga as a
time share would be significantly reduced to about 6 a day because they
were not going to have tour buses and therefore, did not require further
analysis of the noise.
Selma Mann, Deputy City Attorney, clarified there is no EIR on this
project, but that they are working with a Mitigated Negative
Declaration. The CEQA findings as presented includes certain mitigated
measures which reduce EIR impacts to a level of insignificance. If, as a
result of public comments, there are additional impacts that are present,
the Planning Commission can place additional mitigation measures to
reduce impacts to a level of insignificance.
ACTION: CEOA Mitiaated Native Declaration - Approved
Must provide a 4 to 5-foot berm along Walnut Street (petitioner
asked for this flexibility). This is subject to the City
Traffic Engineer's approval for visibility.
Circulation improvement for exit on Ball Road to be done within
90-days from date parcel is secured.
Waiver of Code Requirement - Approved
If parking is not sufficient after build-out, petitioner to
stipulate they will increase parking 14 spaces. (It is
_ petitioner's prerogative to use the excess landscaping if he so
desires).
Conditional Use Permit No. 3258 - Granted
Subject to the Transient Occupancy Taxes collected for the
Vacation Ownership 'Jr.its be reduced to 25~ as opposed to 30~ as
stated in condition no. 28 on page 20 of staff report.
Add condition that petitioner to stipulate to pay fair share of
undergounding utilities on their property.
The Planning Commission took the following action, after their
discussion on this item.
Cor~tmissioner cierbst offered a motion seconded by Commissioner
Bouas and MOTION CARRIED (Commissioner Hellyer absent) for
staff to draft an ordinance for approval by City Council to
eliminate buses parking, standing at the curb and/or staging on
Walnut Street and that this be expedited.
VOTE: 6 yes - Commissioner Hellyer absent)
`J
4/23/S
Page No.
3a. ADDENDUM TO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT N0. 256 (PREY. CERT.)
3b. RECLASSIFICATION N0. 89-90-46
~`"` 3C. WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT
3d. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3262
OWNER: BEDFORD DEVELOPMENT CO., 3002 Dow Ave., Ste. 502, Tustin,
CA 92680
AGENT: ROBERT D. MICHELSON, 328 N. Glassell, Orange, CA 92660
LOCATION: Proper is approximately 2 25 acres located at the
northwest corner of Monte Vista Road and Weir Canyon Road.
CO (SC) to CL (SC)
To permit a commercial retail center and carwash facility with
gasoline sales with waivers of setback adjacent to a scenic
exprassway and a secondary arterial highway.
Continued from the March 26, and April 9, 1990, Planning Commission
meeting.
RECLASSIFICATION RESOLUTION N0. PC 90-94
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION N0. PC 90-95_
'~~j FOLLOWII7G IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
OPPOSITION: None
PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Presented revised plans, eliminating 5 parking
spaces.
COhLtifISSION COMMENTS: Revised plans much better.
STAFF COMMENTS: Engineering - Move Condition No. 1 relating to
deceleration lane from Reclassification to CUP.
ACTION: Approved Addendum to EIR 256 (with monitoring program)
Granted Reclassification
Granted Waivers
Granted CUP (revised plans)
VOTE: 6 yes votes
(Hellyer absent)
Approved
Granted
Approved
Granted
/:!~
4/23/90
Page No. 5
_~ 4a. CEQA NEGATIVE DECLARATION
4b. WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT
~"~° 4c. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 3270 ~i
OWNER: David D'URSO, 4808 Sunrise Beach Road, Olympia, WA 98502
AGENT: PEGGY A. LEFEBURE, 3569 Enterprise Drive, Anaheim, CA 92807
LOCATION: 1547 E. La Palma Avenue. Property is approximately 0.18
acre on the north side of La Palma Avenue approximately 850
feet east of the centerline of Acacia Street.
To permit commercial use of a residential structure with waiver of
vehicle parking limitations.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION N0.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
ACTION: Continued to 5/7/90
VOTE: 6 yes votes (Hellyer absent)
~`,
~,,
Continued to
5-7-90
~~~
;,~:.-
;,: i
4/23/90
Page No. 6
1
5a. CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION
5b. RECLASSIFICATION NO 89 90 49
~'"''~ 5c. VARIANCE N0. 4042
OWNER: SCROEDER-GRIM ORANGE ASSOCIATES, Attn: William Rice, 2411
E. Coast i3wy., #300, Corona Del Mar, CA 92625
AGENT: FARANO AND KIEVIET, 100 S. Anaheim Blvd. #340, Anaheim, CA
92805
LOCATION: 2518 2520 2532 and 2540 West Oran a Avenue. Pro ert is
approximately 2.03 acres located at the southeast corner of
Orange Avenue and Velare Street
RS-A-43,000 to RM-3000 or a less intense zone
To construct a 2-story, 20-(revised to 18)-unit RM-3000 residential
condominium complex with waivers of minimum parking space dimensions,
permitted residential structures and parking access requirement.
RECLASSIFICATION RESOLUTION N0.
VARIANCE RESOLUTION N0.
-----------------------
--------------------------------
_--., FOLLuWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
OPPOSITION: 36 people present
OPPOSITION CONCERNS: Traffic, two accesses to Orange, private street
proposed, parking, Orange is a 2-lane street, no quest parking, felt
developer had not followed Council direction for 10 to 15 single family
homes; would not like to see more than 10 homes; day car center &
schools in the area, proximity to high school, traffic on Valare,
requested stop sign at Hefron & Valare, Valare is drag strip, numerous
traffic accidents already, crime, drug problems, proposed lofts could be
used as bedroom, pushing single-family residences out of neighborhood,
some neighbors not notified.
PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Will be one family residences detached, 1700 &
1900 sq. ft., 3-bedrooms + loft and 2-bedrooms +loft, would revise plans
so loft could not become bedroom, lot of traffic from high school,
traffic is bad, but no records of accidents, would be Planned Unit
Development, controlled by CC&Rs, no bo~~, trailer or camper parking,
landscaping maintained by association, selling price low $300,000,
~~MMISSION COMMENTS: 48 bedrooms, no guest parking, tandem parking on
15-f t. driveway would cause vehicles to overhang sidewalk, 28-foot wide
private street, trash pick up on Orange, reclassification would permit
condominium development if this project not built, should be redesigned
with only one access to Orange, with guest parking provided, possibly
~ for I4 units.
Continued to
5-21-90
Public Hear-
ing Reopened
1,:;.
4/23/90
Page No. 7
STAFF COMMENTS: Traffic - project would generate 204 daily trips, would
investigate whole street and see if stop sign is warranted, includes
"'~ number of accidents, number of cars, schools, number of bedrooms, etc.
ACTION: Continued to 5-21-90
In order for applicant to consider revised plans with only one
access onto Orange and providing parking.
6a. CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION CLASS 4
6b. WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT
6c. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3267
OWNER: GEORGE AND SUSAN TAUS, 29000 S. Western Ave., #305,
Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90735
~,
~~,
AGENT: COURTNEY - READICK, Attn: Chris Courtney, 4605 Lankershim
Blvd., #802, North Hollywood, CA 91602
LOCATION: Property is approximately 1.41 acres located at the
southeast corner of Niobe Street and Brookhurst Street.
To permit a temporary medical office trailer at an existing medical
complex with waiver of minimum number of parking spaces.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION N0. PC 90-96
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
OPPOSITION: None
PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Have complied with conditions and during past
six month„ no problems with neighbors complaining about noise, etc.
ACTION: Granted
VOTE: 6 yes votes
(Hellyer absent)
,~
Granted
Granted
~~= zJ
4/23/90
Page No. 8
7a. CFOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION
,.,. 7b. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3269
OWNER: RYU-HO YUN, 4982 Bixby Circle, Villa Park, CA 92667
LOCATION: 501 - 509 South Brookhurst Street. Property is
approximately 1.1 acres on the west side of Brookhurst
Street approximately 260 feet north of the centerline of
Orange Avenue.
To permit a public dance hall with on-sale of liquor within a
proposed restaurant.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION N0. PC 90-97
----------------------------------------------------------------------
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
OPPOSITION: 7 people present
OPPOSITION CONCERNS: Noise from music is loud bass (boom, boom, boom)
sounds, area south of Broadway to below Ball between Broadway and Orange
is horrible blight; some nice beautiful homes on large lots, noise is a
problem coming from Brookhurst, and it i.s from the Ritz; fights,
yelling, police sirens and helicopters are constant; noise of people
~,..,\ yelling in parking lot at closing time, noise of cars leaving, etc.,
i building was not constructed for dancing and a bar, insulation does not
;~~"~ buffer noise; within .3 mile there is an elementary school and 30 places
which sell alcohol within .8 miles including 4 bars, 5 liquor stores;
concerned about safety; lights shine into neighbor's homes, concerned
that young people would be allowed to go there if there is no age
restriction.
PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Ritz been there 6 years, and there have been no
problems, have upgraded property, building permits approved for
increased floor area, and currently working with Health Dept. & ABC;
several bars in this area, could take measures to mitigate noise, 9
security personnel, entire parking area available, reciprocal parking
agreements, open 3 nights (Fri. Sat & Sun 9 p.m. to 1:30 a.m.); and
there is an age restriction and security does check identifications.
COMMISSION COMMENTS: Restaurant is not really a full restaurant, just
serves fast foods; staff report indicates hours of operation 7 days a
week; original permit for only 3 nights a week, but they have had
dancing on Thursday nights; have expanded without benefit of permits;
landscaping has not been put in; not in favor of dance hall that serves
alcohol, detrimental to neighbors; with noise problems neighbors are
having now, should not be expanded; suggested use should be operated
under original conditions and not expanded; wrong place for dance hall
backing up to residences; should do acoustical treatment in order to
continue operating under old CUP .
''~ J
Denied
Denied
r' ;,
'~ ...~,~C~~~
4/23/90
Page No. 9
I
.::~:.
;. _
STAFF COMMENTS: Code Enforcement - that center has had a lot of
j''~1 complaints about trash, transients, graffiti, but officers have not
°'~' found them open and having dancing on Thursday nights; had a violation
with ABC when they eliminated kitchen.
ACTION: Denied
(use can continued to operate under conditions of original
conditional use permit, if conditions are met)
VOTE: 6 yes votes
(Hellyer absent)
8a. CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION
8b. WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT
8c. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 206]. (READVERTISED)
~~.
'~,_: ;
OWNER: SLYVIA SCOTT, 4081 San Rafael Ave., Los Angeles, CA 90065
AGENT: MARK CORRADINI, 714 N. Anaheim Blvd., Anaheim, CA 92805
LOCATION: Property is approximately 0.18 acre located on the east
side of Anaheim Boulevard approximately 180 feet north of
the centerline of Wilhelmina Street. 7ic~ ~/! /~~,,~c.~~L.,-~~ ~L.
To permit an expansion of an existing alcoholic and drug
rehabilitation center with waivers of minimum number of parking
spaces and permitted location of parking spaces.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION N0. PC 90-98
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
OPPOSITION: None
PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Long term resident substance abuse program for
young people, need parking waiver, State Dept. Drug & Alcohol inspects
and funds program, square footage per person will actually increase with
expansion.
COMMISSION COMMENTS: Maximum of 40 residents.
ACTION: Granted
Deleted Condition No. 13
VOTE: 4 yes votes
(Hellyer, Herbst absent)
(Boydstun - conflict of interest)
~„~,~
Approved
Approved
Granted
,.,,
~J r~~'
4/23/90
Page No. 10
9a. CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION CLASS 3
+:• 9b. VARIANCE N0. 4040
~t ;iJ
OiVNER: TOBY F. AND KATHLEEN WEISSER, PETER M. WEISSER, 25811
Prairie Stone Drive, Laguna Hills, CA 92653
LOCATION: 874 South Claudina Street. Property is approximately
0.16 acre located on the east side of Claudina Street
approximately 260 feet south of the centerline of Valencia
Avenue.
Waivers of the following to construct two ~-bedroom apartment units
in addition to an existing single-family dwelling.
(a) minimum width of pedestrian accessway (granted)
(b) minimum building site area per dwelling unit (granted)
(c) vehicle access requirements (granted)
(d) minimum number of parking spaces (deleted)
VARIANCE RESOLUTION N0. PC 90-99
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. TIOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
OPPOSITION: None
ACTION: Granted, in part
~~• (waivers a, b & c granted
``,:.J waiver d deleted)
VOTE: 4 yes votes
(Hellyer & Herbst absent)
(Boydstun - conflict of interest)
Granted
In part
4-r~ C~•.(.~
4/23/90
Page No. 11
k
10a. CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION Approved
1,nera
lOb. VARIANCE N0. 4041 Granted
1P OWNER: INTERVIVOS TRUST AGREEMENT, JACK AND NELLIE LEVINE,
320 Pine Ave., Long Beach, CA 90802
AGENT: GREENBERG FARROW ARCHITECTURAL INC., 17671 Irvine Blvd.,
#220, Tustin, CA 92680
LOCATION: 2300 West Lincoln Ave. Property is approx?mately 9.1 acres
located on the south side of Lincoln Avenue approximately
655 feet east of the centerline of Gilbert Street.
Waiver of minimum number of parking spaces and limitations to
permitted uses and structures to construct a 90,000-square foot home
improvement center with 16,150 square foot outdoor garden center. -~~
r
VARIANCE RESOLUTION N0. PC 90-100 ~~!/~:`~~
r'
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
OPPOSITION: 4 people present
OPPOSITION CONCERNS: Not opposed to project, but there is a drainage
problem at the end of Transit where thp:.•e is a wall and drainage ditch
and there is an opening in the wall and water constantly drains, and
~~•~' they do not know where the water comes from; would like wall to be all
same height; residential grade lower than subject property.
PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Questioned whether he is required to build a new
wall on the south; agreed to add to the lower section of the wall so it
is all the same height; agreed to work with Engineering regarding
drainage prior to regrading and be sure drainage problem is resolved,
agreed air conditional equipment on roof would be hidden with parapet.
ACTION: Granted
Construct or repair 6-foot wall
Resolve Drainage issue
(Condition #20 deleted)
air conditioning equipment screened
VOTE: 5 yes votes
(Commissioners Hellyer & Herbst absent)
`~~'
4/23/90
Page No. 12
lla. CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION
11b. WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT
s,~:;, ilc. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 3271
OWNER: ORANGE CREST DEVELOPMENT, Attn: Ken Manor, 310 South
Maple Street, Ste. "C", Corona, CA 91720
AGENT: HILL WILLIAMS DEVELOPMENT CORP., Attn: Sam McCann, 175
Riverview Drive, Anaheim, CA 92808
LOCATION: 8205 East Santa Ana Canyon Road. Property is
approximately 3.34 acres on the north side of Santa Ana
Canyon Road approximately 1,050 feet west of the
centerline of Weir Canyon Road.
To permit a commercial retail center with waivers of minimum
setback along freeway, permitted freestanding sign, and permitted
wall signs.
CONDTTI~NAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION N0.
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
OPPOSITION: 1 person present
~ 1` OPPOSITION CONCERNS: Would be detrimental to commercial center across
~~~~~ street, traffic meeting with property owners, discrepancies from people
they purchased property from and subject property was to be a hotel site.
PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Requested waivers becatse of slopes & location
and irregular shape of property; wanted larger and 2 additional signs in
order to get anchor tenants; they were not included in integrated
signage for entire center; and did not think this is sign proliferation;
and signs have been granted to other tenants; indicated they did not
agree to complete the balance of the required parking in conjunction
with the development of the remaining parcels as shown in Paragraph 23,
page 8 of the staff report; agreed curb would be painted red; doctor
present who very likely will acquire one of t:4e buildings and be an
owner/occupant; wanted to split parcel for Building E in the future, but
staff report indicates there was an agreement there would be no further
parcelization; that there will be air conditioning equipment on the
roof. Felt competition is good. Cannot compete with the other center's
rents.
COMMISSION COMMENTS: Clarified two additional signs are being requested
and identification of same two tenants on the monument sign. Did not
think this is an integrated center.
STAFF COMMENTS: Felt matter should be continued so unanswered issues
can be addressed, information about a meeting held with property owners
and agreements met and there are discrepancies, some of the property
~,.,.~ owners had left meeting early an~i should be present. Exhibit shows a
:ontinued to
i-7-90
~/~~,~1
4/23/90
Page No. 13
rr,:
multitude of signs and they have changed their request. Plans in file
show this is site for hotel; problems with parking and narrow streets,
and red curb could affect other properties. Engineering - only one
driveway is on this property. Parking was originally analysed for
entire center and did not see continued parcelization of the site.
ACTION: Continued to 5-7-90
VOTE: 4 yes votes
(Commissioners Hellyer & Herbst absent)
(Commissioner McBurney - conflict of interest)
4/23/90
Page No. 14
~n~
12 a. CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION
~,xf 12b. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT N0. 302
12c. RECLASSIFICATION N0. 89-90-5~
INITIATED BY THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, 200 S. Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim,
CA 925.3
LOCATION: Property is approximately 16.4 acres generally bounded by
Water Street to the north, Olive Street to the east, South
Street to the south and the alley east of Anaheim Boulevard
to the west. Also including the area generally bounded by
Santa Ana Street to the north, Olive Street to the east,
Water Street to the south and Claudina Street to the west.
Excepting the northerly 360 feet and the easterly 140 feet
north of Water Street.
A City-initiated amendment to the Land Use Element of the General
Plan redesignating subject area from the Medium Density Residential
designation to the Low-Medium Density Residential designation.
A City-initiated reclassification of subject area from the RM-1300,
RM-2400 and RS-7200 Zones to the RS-5000 or a less intense zone.
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT RESOLUTION NO. PC 90-101
RECLASSIFICATION RESOLUTION N0. PC 90-102
---------------------------------------
----------------------------------
*~'~" FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
OPPOSITION: 1 person present in opposition
1 person present in favor
(petition submitted with 13 signatures in favor)
OPPOSITION CONCERNS: Felt this would decrease property value of those
who have not already developed with multiple-family units.
ACTION: Approved
VOTE: 5 yes votes
(Commissioners Hellyer & Herbst absent)
approved
;ranted
;ranted
,°
I,.
~{~1~,
,~ ,.N
4/23/90
Page No. 15
_c<
13 a. CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION
13b. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 303
~„
INITIATED BY THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, 200 S. Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim,
CA 92803
LOCATION: Property is approximately 6.5 acres generally bounded by
Cypress Street to the north, Rose Street to the east, the
alley north of Lincoln Avenue to the south, and the alley
west of Vine Street to the west, also including those 10
parcels fronting on the east side of Rose Street between
Cypress Street to the north and Lincoln Avenue to the south.
A City-initiated amendment to the Land Use Element of the General
Plan redesignating subject area from the Medium Density Residential
designation to the Low Density Residential destination.
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT RESOLUTION N0. PL 90-103
~~~
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOLLOWTNG IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
OPPOSITION: 5 people present in favor
ACTION: Approved
VOTE: 5 yes votes
(Commissioners Hellyer & Herbst absent}
Approved
Approved
4/23/90
Page No. 16
',~;r
p^'^,
~,~;
`.~~?
14. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS:
A. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 3175 - REQUEST FOR RETROACTIVE
EXTENSION OF TIME TO COMPLY WITH CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: Joey
Messina, requestor for property located at 1319 N. Cozyy Terrace.
~p~cVed- Sv2 ccu,P~1 9U~ - To E~~A/2~- 'I15/Rv
B. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT0N0. 2917 - REQUEST FOR RETROACTIVE
EXTENSION OF TIME IN ORDER TO COMPLY WITH CONDITIONS OF
APPROVAL: David Sito (Architecture Plus, Inc.) requestor
for[~property located at 128 West 'B~r~o"adwa ` r
i ~ ~~ C U ~C~ ~C.~ R UYI~ ~ ~r (J l'1[,6~ S -~ C x ~ /Y~. C- (0 1 ~L/~ O
!1
C. PROPOSED CODE AMENDMENT PERTAINING TO GROUND MOUNTED
ANTENNAS IN THE COMMERCIAL SCENIC CORRIDOR OVERLAY ZONE.
D. REQUEST OF A WAIVER •r'OR GRADING PLAN N0. 1248 REVISION 2, PER ~
SECTION 17 06 29 OF THE REQUIREMENT OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
HILLSIDE RADING ORDINANCE AS IT RELATES TO THE LOCATION OF LOTt~
LINES ADJACENT TO SLOPES. SECTIOPJ 17.06.120.04 AND TABLE 17-A
E. ORANGE COUNTY GENERAL SERVICES AGENCY - REQUEST TO DETERMINE
CONFORMANCE WITH THE GENERAL PLAN - Proaer_y is located at 1601
East Orangewood Avenue.
F. ORANGE COUNTY GENERAL SERVICES AGENCY - REQUEST TO DETERMINE
CONFORMANCE WITH THE GENERAL PLAN - Property is located
at 503 North Anaheim Boulevard.
15. OTHER DI:iCUSSION:
DISCIJSSION OF CR SIGNAGE - (Continued from
April 18th Work Session)
ADJOURNED: 8:20 p.m.
Approved
to 7-5-90.
~~ / a,J
Approved
to 6-22-•90.
;" /:~~I t
Rec. Council
Adoption
Denied
Approved
Approved
Continued to
4/30/90 -
3:00 p.m.
4/23/90
Page No. 17