Minutes-PC 1990/11/19 (2)~n7~'Lt .. ~.M>t:::uz =.w+.w ..i- ° ..F~'S~y~...k °5~:1 I
, ,.
" .J
, a ~ ,~~. C
~7~i ~ 1 o r~
`~ 1~
N -:r °.:.
~. , :. - !a
~ ~" t~ ~' ,, ACTION AGENDA o .
i ~ .- u '. _, ~ U ~\f ~~, ii ~-rib
ME
~ ~ ETING OF THE ANAHEIM CITY. PLANNING COMMISSIONy
.,,. ;: .
MONDA
Y, NOVEMBER 19 1'990
~:. - .. y-
~~ Ji
~ i' PRELIMINARY PLAN REVIEW ~ ~~ `'
~ ~(
"~~ PUBLIC HEARING
~~ ~ `~ "" ~ -~ (PUBIC TESTIMONY)
' t 10:00 A.M. 1:30 P.M. o ~ .~.
~ '~t
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT:. BOUAS, BOYDSTUN, FELDHAUS, HENNINGER, HELLYER,
MESSE, PERAZA
PROCEDURE TO EXPEDITE PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARINGS
~. ,:' ,
1. The proponents in'applications which are not contested will have five
minutes to present their evidence. Additional time will be granted upon
reque3t if, in the opinion of the Commission, such additional time will
produce evidences important to the Commission's consideration.
2• In contested appl:.cations, the proponents and opponent will each be given I~~
ten minutes to present his case unless additional time is requested and the
complexity of the matter warrants. The Commission's considerations are not
determined by the length of time a participant speaks, but rather by what
!:e says.
3. Staff Reports are part of the evidence deemed received by the Commission in
each hearing. Copies are available to the public prior to the meeting.
4. The Commission will withhold questions until the public hearing ie closed.
5. The Commission reserves the right to deviate from the foregoing if, in its
opinion, the ends of fairness to all concerned will be served.
b• All documents are presented to the Planning Commissian for review in
connection with any hearing, including photographs or other acceptable
visual representations of ron-documentary evidence, shall be retained by
the Commission for the public record and shall Y,~ available for public
insF:ections.
7• At the end of the scheduled hearings, members of the public will be allowed
to speak on items of interest which are within the jurisdiction of the
Planning Commission, and or agenda items. Each speaker will be allotted a
maximum of five (5) minutes to speak.
CA1004OE
Paqe 1
?`~ ' ~
_ ,:
,._
Ll~ ~~
~~ ~
' f J
~
la ~ CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION ~-'~i•
~ `'
~ C
t lb `RECLASSr:rrrzmION NO 90 9~ 19 ~ ,:'~~ Removed {~~
'
, 1c;~~WAIVER' OF- CODE° REOUIREt~NT ~~K from `'
.~
, ld. ~ONDITIOD~~ USE PERMIT'NO 3353 ,~: n agenda,,
,
,~ a~~„ ~,: ~. ..
~, l
-, ~ ~ -
l
~ to be .. :rw
., p'
r" ~
f
, ~,
~/,,r
~. ANAHEIM
o OWNER:
~: CITY OF
~
~ readvertiaedti
~
`
C,/O Z
UR,
r SCHHIE
DE,~~30
S..-HARBOR BLVD.
' ° STE ,~:
,
. 500, ANAHEIM, CA 92805
C
~ ~~ o
~. ~i ~ ' f
~~:.
~ LOCATION:; ro rt is a roximatelv'14.54 acres f8.15 acres of 14
54
e`
.
acr
s under Co ditional Uae Permit No 3353 oniv~ havino a
~:
F- frontaoe o annroximately 360 feet on the
south aide of
Sanderson Ave
h ~ '
~„
~ nue,
avino a maximum de th of aDnroximately
~> 750 feet and bein
l
g
ocated aouroximately 400 feet south
and west of the centerline
f A
o
uto Center Drive ~':.)
_ ` To permit a German Social Club (Phoenix Club) with a restaurant with
on-vale alco1:olic beverages
a
i
,
sem
-enclosed restaurant with on-sale
°alcoholic beverages, a dance and ae(Sembl
h
ll
-~'~',
y
a
, a picnic area, an
air rifle and archery shooting ayes
a ma
'
,
nager
s living quarters to
include musician living quarters
a privat
,
e school, am'~sement rides
.including hot air balloon rides and fireworks displa
s
a b
~' y
,
eer
garden area, a soccer field, a 50 foot high clock tower, a 4G foot
high maypole a
d 4
n
storage containers, with waiver of minimum number
of parking spaces and maximum fe j
nce height.
i
Petitioner requests reclaesificatiom>of subject
ro
t ~~
'~
p
per
y from the
ML(Industrial Limited) zone to the CL(Co-nmercial
Limit
d
i
~ i
~I
,
e
) or a lase
ntense zone. i
Continued from the November 5, Planning Commission meeting.
RECLASSIFIG_ATION RESOLUTIO4 NO.
OONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION NO.
11/15/90
Page 2
~,
®~
. ,~j-.
- ~.,.1;~,
G:y
: :5
~i.ua ra d/ .eruy rk« i ..f ~ '3
'~
;~ yrx~ ~
~ j
~
, J
,,
+
~'
~
~ `~
~` ^ ~ r
'/
2a
CEOA `NEGATIVE DECLARATION
1'
~~° C
tin
.
~ on
uen
~ ~~
r to 12/3/90 ^~~
-
_• ~
.~~, ~
NO. 3359 Readve
2c. rCONDITIONAI, USEPERMIT
rtieed
?~
., OWNER:' WII:LIAM C.~ TAORMINA AND `VINCENT C. TAORMINA, P.O. ~~~OX 303 ~;
ANA;,IEIM, CA 92815-0309 ~~ , , ~ `fi
r
AGENT: RICHARD•WINN/TOM VOGT, P,. O. ,,BOX 309, ANAHEIM, CA c
92815-0309
~
_
' ~~
LOCATION2:` 2761-2781 E. WHITE STAR AVE. Property is approximately c ,
`'11.5 scree located at the west side of Blue Gum Street and
~, `approximately 32 feet on the north of the centerline of La
+~ Palma'':Ave.
To permit the'expaneion of a recycling/resource recovery transfer-
facility~~;wit!+~aa~iver of~~ minimum number of parking spaces.
`- Continued from the November 5, 1990, Planning Commission meeting.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION N0.
3a. CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION Continued
3b.r WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT to 12/3/90
3c.' CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3336
OWNER: NORWALK INVESTMENTS, C/O STEPHEN WONG, 1020 n. BATAVZA
ST., STE. B, ORANGE, CA 92667
AGENT: PEDRO GOMEZ, 536 S. ROSE ST., ANAHEIM, CA 92805
LOCATION: 536 SOUTH ROSE STREET. Property is approximately 0.6 ac_e
located on the east aide of Rose Street and approximately
530 feet south ~f the centerline of San:p Ana Street.
To permit an automobile repair facility with waiver of minimum
number of parking spaces.
Continued from the November 5, 1990 Planning Commission meeting.
CONDITIONAL USE-PERMIT RESOLUTION NO.
FOLLOWINC IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
~,OMMISSION COMMENT'J: Property Manager meet be present at hearing, not
just the ag®nt= nek®d staff to notify the !roperty Manager that item has
be®n continued for two weeks and that he must be present.
& TION: Continued to 12/3/40
11/19/90
Page 3
<'T~ ~ ~ , `
s°' s~ .4a. ~QA NEGATIVES' DECLARATION
'
, 1~4b WAIVER`OF CODE'REOUIREMENT
,
-~; 4c CONDITION AL' USE PERMIT N0.~~3355
,
~'"~
i
~' - ~
; ,
~
*'~ ~ _ ~
h,. ~. • `~OWNER:~~ ~ASBESTEL -APPLIED, 214 COOPER CENTER, PENNSAUKEN,, NJ
,~. n
`08109
~.
o- AGENT: MEL BULLINGER,~520 W. WHITTIER BLVD., MONTEBELLO, CA
"
t`
~;~ ~ 90640 ( <:?
l ,
..
:,, . . ~, ~
~ ~ LOCATION: 1295 North Kraemer Blvd. Property is approximately 0..48-
acre located at the southwest corner of Miraloma Ave. and
Kraemer Blvd.
To"permit a retail and wholesale carpet business with waiver of
minimum number of parking spaces.
~,
Continued from thc;November 5, 1990 Planning Commission meating.
~'~ CONDITIONAL JSE PERMIT RESOLUTION NO. PC90-261
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AE`TION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIPL MINUTES.
OPPOSITION: None
COMMISSION COMMENTS: None
C ON: CEQA Negative Declaration -Approved
Waiver of Code :tequirement -Approved
Conditional Use Permit No. 3355 -Granted
VOTE• 7-0
11/15/90
Page 4
'; ~ ..
-r, ~,
~.
{C x
d. ~ 1. ... ~ ~ ,, ~ ' ~V ~ -
~1 'H' .. .,. ' i~•
~;~` ba ; CEOA NEGATIVE' DECLARATION' Continued`;"
c
tr:,: 5b 'CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 3358 {i to 12/3/90.
~~ -OWNER: MOBIL OIL CORPORATd-OJN~?800 W r_A,lameda, #2000, Burbank, GA
~. _
91505 ~~ ~~ ~; ~ ~
,. , : ..;
`~'
~ AGENT: JGREER & COMPANY, 2323 W. Lincoln Ave., #127, :Anaheim, CA s^
" ~ 92801
LOCATION:_~],680 West Broadwav., Property is approximately 0.49 acre
~ located at the southeast corner of Broadway and Euclid`
Street.
J I l i
~° y,_ To perr,-it a convenience market within an existing service station.
F Contin~ed from November 5, 1990 Planning Commission\meeting.
/ '' ';,
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION NO.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
~,
PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Asked for a continuance to 12/3/90; had a concern
regarding item no. 4, page 8,qf the conditions; has a meeting scheduled
for Tueeday, November 20, 1990, with the TrR:fic Engineer.
COMMISSION COMMENTS: Concern that there was rathing mentioned regarding
separate mRne and womene restrooms.
C O Aontinued to 12/3/90
12/19/90
Page 5
~''nn
~ ' I t
k
~~ Y
:1
~
2~y?y7..
~
~ i~,
~~
~i ~
r~ _ YOU
'X
,. ~
V-
4+-yt-•
..
. ,_ • b
a
.
~ 6a: r ;:
CEQAY NEGA .
TIVE DECLARATION
Continued,
,~ <,-_ 6b: RRet•aSSIFICATION N0: 90-91=14 _ ~ to 12/17/90,:,,
5c. ~'9NDITION f "'USE PERMIT NO.` 3354
` ~ F
~- `1 ~ ~+
~
`
OWNER: Ei, 3305 MONTEREY DRIVE, ''SAN
FIASSAN .AND DIXIE 'MOHAGHE
,, n .
{
.. q
MARINO, CA .91108 +~
G 1
v"^ Ci~ , AGENT: A R: MOHAGHEGH, 12652 HUST1`N ST.~ NORTH HOLLYWOOD, CA
':
~~ 91607
; u
~r: ~
~,_ ~~ LOCATION: 1242'West Lincoln Ave: Subjtect property consists of two
parcels with the following descriptions: Parcel (A) is an
irregularly shaped parcel of hand consisting of
approximately 0.18 acre located on the northwest corner of
Center Street and Villa Place,`~having approximate •
frontages of 6 feet on the north side of Center Street and
,i~ 140 feet an the west side of Villa Place. Parcel (B) is a
,,
rectangularly shaped narce~,,of land consisting of
approximately 0.67 acre located on the southeast corner of
Lincoln Avenue and Villa Place hading approximate
frontages of 103 feet on the south aide Lincoln Ave. and
285 feet on the east side of Villa Place. - i
Portion A frorl CG to CL and Portion B from CG to CL.
To permit an 8,981 square foot commercial retail center.
Continued from the November 5, 1990 Planning Commission meeting.
RECLASSIFICATION PERMIT NO.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION N0.
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
ACTION: Applicant not present at hearing; staff unable to locate
applicant; recommended a 4 week continuance to 12/17/90.
11/19/90
Page 6
,r 1i 'iF t•_ ~
~/' J ^ ,_ ~ .~ ,r~. / ~
4 '~-
'
. ,. ems
...,
7a. ~ NEGATIVE DECLARATION „
7b. FIANCE NO. 4093" Approved Vl
x
~ Denied ='
~
"
Sys
-~.~ . ~
OWNER:. RICHARD LEWIS,"855 S. Claudina Street, Anaheim, CA 92805
li .
~
~L~;
-.
AGENT: SAM H. ISY~K,. 1240 N. Van Buren, , #113, Anaheim, CA 92"807 ~J' .;
J ,,
"
~'
" ~
LOCATION:. 855 South Claudina Street. Property's approximately 0.16
,~
~" acre located at the southwest corner of Valencia Street ~,
and Claudina Street. ,
Waivers of minimum building site area per dwelling unit, minimum '
structural setback, minimum required yard, minimum number of parking
spaces,>required vehicle access and permitted encroachment
into - U'
,
required ;{ards to conetruc_t_ a 2-unit apartment building in ~~
conjunction with an existing single-family residence.
Continued fram the November 5, 1990 Blanninq Commission meeting.
' VARIANCE RESOLUTION N0. PC90-262
-------------------------------------
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
OPPOSITION: None
(one interested person spoke)
PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Trying to extend driveway from 22 feet to 25 feet;
will be used for a turn-arocnd.
COMMISSION COMMENTS: Ovef:• improvement of the parcel; too much density on
such a small piece of property; come back with a better plan.
C ON: CEQA Negative Delcaratian - Approved
Variance No. 4093 - Denied
VOTE: 6-0 (commissioner eoydetun abstained)
1/19/90
Page 7
a
w
1 ~
/~~
~, ,.~
,. ,
~ ~ ~ CSOA NEGATIVE r ": ; r , _
r - 8b. ~`' ~. N~(Previously Approved)..
' Sa• VARIANCE NO. '2194AReadvertieedl TIME EXTENSION - Public Hearing-
..
"e ..
r,
S, - _.
~~'. OWNER:,, ETHEL MYERS, 529 Victoria Ave., Venice, CA 90291
~,,f.
h~
,,,, AGENT: RICKS PALLET REPAIR SERVICES, P.O.:BOX 4161, Garden Grove,
CA 92642
~`'~' LOCATION: 1521 N. Miller St. Property ie~approximately 2 acres
located on'the west aide of Miller Street approximately
563 feet south of the centerline of Orangethorpe Ave.
Request for an extension of time for w:.iver of maximum fence height
to retain outdoor storage of pallets.
Continued from the August 27, 1990, September 24, 1990, and November
5, 1990 Planning Commission meetings.
VARIANCE RESOLUTION N0. PC90-263
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOLLO~r1ING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
OPPOSITION• 1
OPPOSITION CONCERNS: It was their understanding that pallets would not be
any higher than 6 feet, however, they are stacked 8 feet high] dose
trailer have toilet facilities?
PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Have cleaned up area; repaired broken windows;
have done everything they could to bring this up to conformances have
cooperated with Code Enforcement; offer no problems to the City ar the
environment; went over Code Enforcement's memo dated 9/20/90 by Peggy
Flanagan; will stripe parking stalls; addressed drt~p cords; could not
obtain a permit until they got a CUP, however, went over electrical with
electrical engineer] electrical being supplied through temporary power
pole; new cover put on panel box in trailer; inside the office there ie a
bathroom with a toilet and a sink; outside there ie a toilet inside a wood
enclosure attached to the sewer; only thing they lack again is a psrmit;
no sewage leak, it was a water faucet that was leaking and it has been
repaired; no vehic:ee ware parked in the front area; spoke with Traffic
Engineer and plane show that it ie paved in front of the fence] probably
only room for 2 parking spaces; owner would like to park there and also
visitors so they do not have to drive in the yard; does have landscaping;
there was someone staring heavy equipment, hawever, he has been asked to
leave and he indicated he would leave by the end of the month.
11/19/90
Page 8
W 1 ! '~~.:.. .t ...
~~f ~ ~-.
_.
C`
1~2•_ v
.~a~ ~
,~ `t' ~S~MMISSION COt4SENTS:C Pouring oil on ground;" allowing oil to seep into .the
s4,~tZ r water ,basin below; :,allowing people to wozk.on their cars:.on the weekends;
,;~ need to-asphalt the area in order to keep the water/oil from seeping into
,,
,~. ~ the°.ground. ,,No gravel was empaeized.
3~ STAFF~NTS: Alfred Yalda, clarified Standards 436 and.602 is
r~ regarding striping ,for the handicapped and regular parking stalls;
~ Peggy;.R'lanagan', Code„Enforcement Officer,;. went over the list of
~~~~
;~ -> violations attached to subject staff report. `
c
ON: CEQA Negative Declaration (Prey. Approved) - Approved
Variance No. 2194 - (Read.) Time Extension - Granted
(To expire 8/20/92)
1. Asphalt area within 90 days in order to keep
ground water from seeping through ground.
2. Have 90 days to install sprinklers in trailer rather
than one year
3. Owners agreed to enter into an agreement with Redevelopment
and agrees to all other conditions and stipulations.
VOTE: 7-0
11J19/90
Paga 9
ti r.,.ro r
~~ .. _
(iii ~
(1 !~Lf M
"~
°- o
cNo Action
Granted fore
~ _ ~ 2 years
~ _. , ,. (To;' expire
~~ ~ ~ ~ 820%92 )~"
_ ,, -~~
OWNER: MICHAEL D. MYE'RS ET AL, 4002 Morningstar Dr.,'Huntington ,y
~~. ~~ Beach, CA 92649,
] .,~.
i __ ~ ~r
r: AGENTS ;ALLEN R.'LOISELLE, P.V. BOX 4161, Garden Grove, CA 92670
. LOCATION: 1521 Narth Miller Stree*. Property is approximately 2.0
- acres located on the west ®ide of Miller Street and ~;
,~
approximately 563 feet south of the centerline of -
Orangethorpe Ave.
To retain a temporary office trailer.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION N0. PC90-264
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMAP.Y OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
Note: Both items 8 and 9 were heard together, although voted on
separately)
PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Clarified there are 2 pr.opertiea involved and this
one ie the southern portion; one tenant resides on both pieces of
property; did meet with Redevelopment last Wed. and 4~ent over some of the
problems; she clarified the office would be in the trailer.
COMMISSION COMMENTS: Refer to comments for item no. 8.
SiT$}~F COMMENTS: p~ggy Flanagan, Code Enforcement Officer, went over
the "Follow-up Inspections" sheet.
ACTION: CEQA Catogorical Exemption - Class 3 (No Action)
Conditional Use Permit No. 3361 - Granted
(To expire in 2 years on 8/20/92)
(Refer to comments for item no 8)
VOTE: 7-0
11/19/90
Page 10
iC N 1'1''3 CCY~
~~
r~ ' ... i,
r~ _~ y r '.' S'.
"~
~
, ~.
. - ~,,:
l0 AT
A
I "
C
~
~
a C
EGOR
C, EXEMPT
LASS - 11 ~~
.,
h
~
' ~ No Action
~
G u . lOb.
h ' VNtIANCE` N O: 4096
`
`~ Granted.':
} .. v - J
~.~
~ OWNER: STERIK CO., 828 Moraga Drive, Bel Air, CA 90049`
l ~_~
'~,
~ Ci.
'
_
~' AGENT...., SIRIANNI ENTERPRISE, 430 Lexington St. ,; Auburndale, MA
~
s 02166; HEATH CO. 3225 Lacy St., Loa Angeles, CA 90031 =~ ~ q,
~
,
~ ,~ f
~', LfiCATION: 88 East Oranaethorpe Ave. Property is approximately"10.1 '
acres located at the southeast corner of Lemon Street and
-- Orangethorpe Ave.
Waiver of maximum area of freestanding signs to add a 68 square-foot
cabinetl~to an existing 340 square foot pole sign.
a V • ~
VARIANCE RESOLUTION N0. PC90-265
FOLLOWING TS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
OPPOSITION: None ``
PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Request to add a 68 eq. ft. sign to an existing
340 sq. ft. pole sign to advertise one existing major tenant.
COMMISSION COMMENTS: Have a naw policy requiring new freestanding
signage to be limited to an 8-foot high monument type; sign is moat
dominating sign in immediate area.
A ON: CEQA Categorical Exemption - Class 11 (No Action)
Variance No. 4096 - Granted
VOTE: 4-3 (Commiseiongra Hellyer, Henninger and Meese voting NO}
The following motion was made:
Commissioner Melee offered a motion, seconded by Commissioner Bouas and
MOTION CARRIED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby
direct staff to initiate reclassification proceedings to rezone subject
property tc the CL Zone.
11/19/90
Page 11
u f ... ..
li +t - tl ~ ~ i :: I
~~~ ~i, .~ .. c ~~'
~ + ~~ V
/i ~ o
;.. _, h
~.
~~~ -. c. ~~ ~J a ,.. if:
..
CEOA
~ *~" ila NEGATIVE LECLARATION,.
~~' ~llb _CANDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 1215 READVERTISED ~ ~ ~~
t ~ ,,
OWNER: ICENNEY GOLF ENTERPRISES INC., 3486 Enderby Way, Sunnyvale,
CA 94087_ ~ ~ (~.... „
~ -
~ ~ ~ LOCATION:, 3200 Carpenter Ave. Property is approximately 5.89, acres,.
located on the south aide of Carpenter Ave., approximately
''= ,. 55-feet east of the centerline of Shepard Street. ;,
~ _ Ta permit a 9,804 square foot addition tc an existing clubhouse (for
an additicnal arcade and snack bar areaj.,
~~ ~;
CONDITIONAL:USE PERMIT RESOLUTION NO.
I
I,
11/19/90
Page 12
J Y.M ~ ~ ! :. _ .. . ...
yl; o
t. '.
d. `~~i,
sr< 12a. CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION Previously Approved
~ ~ ~ `'12b. CONDITIONAI; USE PERMIT N0 3287 -
t. ~. _
4 +,
+, OWNER: PLOTKIN-ROSEN DEVELOPMENT, Attn: ;Jeff Rosen, 19772 Mac
~ Arthur Blvd., #201, Ixvine, CA 92715
~~ ~~;
-- AGENT: GRIMMWAY DEVELOPMENT, Attn: JUNE RALLY, 2411 E: Pacific
- Coast Hwy., #300, Corona Del Mar, CA 92625
LOCATION: 810 North Euclid Street. Property ie approximately 0.46
+, acres located on the east side of Euclid Street and
„~:, approximately 240 feet south of the centerline of Catalpa
`~° Drive.
i. To delete a condition of a royal \
pp pertaining to vehicular access
rights.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION NO. PC90-266
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMAR:I OF THE .PLANNYNG COMMISSION ACTION. t70T TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINtjTES.
OPPOSITION: 1
OPPOSITION CONCERNS: Owns adjacent property; concern regarding
installation of the median.
P'ETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Rsk that condition no. 5 be deleted; ;lave redrawn
plane and have submitted them to Alfred Yalda, Traffic Engineering;
suggest putting median further back out of way of MacDonaid's restauraktt.
COMMISSION COMMENTS: Add a right turn in and right turn out only; left
turn is undesirable; delete condition no. 5
CT ON: CEQA Nsgative Declaration (Prey. Approved) - Approved
Conditional Use Permit No. 3287 (Read.) - Granted
(1. Remove condition no. 5.)
(2. Add a right-turn in and right-turn out only
from subject property or:ta Euclid)
VO2,E: 7-0
11(19/90
Page 13
L t ~ ... f ~~ ~ ,~. .
,#~.~' TO _BE .su "AP'TFA 6°:~00 P.M.. i ~i`,
~,i. ry
r ~( _ ~ ,
r~ 13a. " CEQA N80ATIVE DECL_ntrnTrny ° ~'r J '
~; 13b. SSIFICATION'NO90-91 to ~ ~~
. I.. o ~~
0:9NER:, INITIATED ~Y THE CITY 'OF ANAI~IM, 200 SOUTH ANAHEIM BLVD.,
` ANAHSIlI, CA 92803
,~
.~'.:
Approved -
Granted
LOCATION: Property ie approximately 96 acres generally bounded by La
Palma Ave. to the north, thee Union Pacific Railroad
right-of-way to the east, Cy~.~ress Street to the south and
Anaheim Blvd. to the west, excluding those properties which
front: on Anaheim Fslvd. or La Palma Ave., and further
excluding the area generally bounded by Wilhelmina Street to
the north, the Union Pacific Railroad right-of-way to the
east, Sycamore Street to the south and Sabina Street to the
west.
A City-initiated reclassification of subject area from the RM-2400
(Residential, Multiple-Family) and PD-C/RM-2400 (Parking
District-Commercial/RM-2400) Zones to the RS-5000 (Residential,
Single-Family) Zone.
Continued from the November 5, 1990 Planning Commission meeting.
RECLASSIFICATION RESOLUTION NO. PC 90-267
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. C`
OPPOSITION: Approximately 15 people present in oppoeti.on
Approximately 35 people present in favor
OPPOSITION CONCERNS: ~'~ -
~
1. Decreased ro
p perty value for, those who intend to develop their
Property with multiple-family units.
, 2. Existing multiple-family-units could not be replaced if
destroyed more than 50$ by fire or earthquake; more difficult
to sell
l
d
- 3 ;
en
ers would not finance non-conforming unite
Uthe
. r properties have already been developed with
multiple-family units and downzoning would be denying that
4 privilege to those who purchased with intent of adding units
-
~ .
Asked for additional survey (in Spanish & English) to
5 determine if majority of pro
p
a
d
ng
. Felt Code ,Enforcement should
enforce codes
and
reeolve
overcrowding, parking, etc, problems
6.
` Questioned the 50$'lose portion of ordinance and whether that
i
s 50$ of the volume or value, and who would make the
determination (Fire Department, Code Enforcement, Building
Department, insurance company,)
7. .Presented map o£. their own survey of the area which differed `
-
y' from the exhibit presented by staff; 'their survey done by
'
' ,
visual inspection-from drivin ast
~, 9 P properties and counting
a
~ g
rages which had antennas or. curtains on assumption that '`
~
~ ~ somebody ,was livin~~, there, and-indicated their survey reflects
`r
°,,,
~~
{1 that ma orit of
j Y ,properties already have multi le units
' P
.~ ~~
it
~,
~ _ ~~ ..
o .- li/19/90
'.
'
-~
~ ~
-
ac a "
k .
. C o
y~ u
o n
° ~ ~
- - _ - .. ~ Zi ~ ...
=.~
1
a
0
~ , ~;
~_. .1 .:ur8 is
~; ~ ii _ „~
hrees~nermftA ,ha'vn ~; ~";ii:~'~'~rf~'~"~i'x1
~.t y ~ rm~. ,~y. +u L•.+a1 ~~recreaLion"bueineHBQS '~~+,~ ~' ~' ~~ ^ "~ "~~`'~
~ ~ ~ 11 r NCB ~Y@Vid@I11t~hd g ~~R..~X~r S' ~ ~ r37r*~~rrfe~'~~-`~7 ~!7°~'s3 4SStt.~,r= w~' `~ ' t~~~~'
~' ,r„y,~,,,^~ ~ partmdnt dwellers, are, causin ~
~"~ `~ 12 Suggested rdeei yn ~ 4 3~~;7 r±p-r ~ ~i r;f.,U s~x.:r~r, g wCr e-~ ~ "'~1 ~,
~• a ~ s ~~~~,~~g k review.; c ~x.,, ~•.,1, ~ ,"~
ommittee for•control of`the look and ~ ~ ~'
~,~. ~~ way structureee are built ~' ~-" ~ ~ ~~~ tl
j ~ ` `r ' ~a'* ~ 1~i~~ ;
;,. ~~13: Suggest incentives to owners 'to build owner/occupied housing; ~ '~,
:~ti - ,
no evidence.eubmitted that eing'le-family;tomee existing are
~ ~' ,,owner =occupied ,'. ';fz
~` 14• High quality developments enhance values in the zei~hborhood` `
k ~ -~
~ ~ '
15. - Not true;denaity affects crime in the neighborhot~d ,but
^~
1~
ProPertY'valuss do affect crime, _ ~
~~ ~i,
16. Suggested,,mectianiem for both aides o~'
.''dialogue to come up with wa s t \ issue-to engage in
< o `
~,. c
17 .
`~
~'
19.
Y resolve ~\problems and
guarantee that property values continue to go titp
~~!
Downzoning would create nightmares for owners who want to`
`finance; refinance, build, etc. and could reverse the current ~
trend of upgrading the area. ;,
Housing needs in five years (8232 units - 438, or 3533='unite`
for very low income households-and 578 for moderate to upper
income households) cannot be met, with no vacant land left on J
which to build housing units; and downzoning takes 300 .units
out of circulation; recycling of land is important ,
People want to live near employment and traffic is already
problem
PROPONENT'S COMMENTS:
1• Downzoning is needed to reduce density in the area which is
causing the following:
A. Overcrowding, people living in garagea,~mare than ore
family living in single-family units
~' S. Parking problems
C. Traffic problems
D. Crime increase
E. Graffiti
F. Gang Activities
G. No play area for children
2• High density apartments affects their quality of life
3• Many elderly people live in area
4: Concerned that with RM-2400 zoning, somebody could assemble
properties ana build a massive project
5• Two-story structures next to single-story homes take away
,::.privacy and affect property values of single-family
6• High density developments put strain on city services and
utilities
7• Single-family `homes are being purchased and refurbished and
tti~re is pride of ownership in the area
8•` This i"s a policy decision `whether we want to maintain the`
zoning which will.put 4 or 5 times the number o~ people into
an area which is already a-'strain on the infrastructure, etc.
~l
;~
11/19/90
Page 15
i
,i~.
;1: ~'
f
r ~~ ~ ~ ; ~
s ~ tv v
~ ~{,~` .~!,~r`F $t "~2 is .S~Sj 1 r`f~ Y` t e.~~~ .
9 i n.
s w cd'~., .ra ~tk~l~' ~.,~'.~'~ ~' ~ ~ r`~~'~S'1 n5`y. ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~`'
9 ~ City st ff needsto checkpermits,~and}inepect,auildinge4j ~
10: ~ Felt propert valuee,~of,~e ~g a fatmily :homee?~~ oul~~" b`e~ratai~ned~ ~~j ,~`:"
'~ w .h dOhTn n ~'~~~ ~ ~ ~..'~' '~. .. b ,'..~ ~ ,~~z.:5~~v~' ~rn~~~. 3 . ~r~ z ,<i°~y,
11 C y ie encouraging3l~firat;,;time buyers 'with inc9nt"iver loansa for: f.;v~
:down a n s e c s. },,, ~}~. ~. ,.. ~,
~~SkYPr~T'4~ :mot r 4 7, lJa} ~i1f,"Y.tt'45'tri~'~~i! y~~ I7v~t Y
~}Zon n 'e undat o for:,dew~elopment and impleme~tat~ion~.of ,; ~'
~~ F W A,hel] t r°N" it krw5' !Jy 4f~7c 9 i ~
~~, programs, Houeing~-&~Community Development has ihcentive - ~~
programs, Haig orhood preservation, etc
+~"a P''''r-a'ax°'k ;"'tC'~'+,. "~'~w:-~'~"` M ~~ Nth ', , ~: ` '~u~.
Y3'~,~s~A=sae with hi heat "incidents of crime ~ ~~
~~~~tr ~:9 ~ , ~wm~ ~ ~; ~ graffiti,; etc are
those areas where highest'deneity projectie are developed ,~
14 People who live in~the area want low density. to re-ea~akilish ~'~ ~~~`~i
h'igh' quality,. low density neighborhood. ~~~$~ r'~1 };
15 ~ Direction~'of ~iow .this ,area is going to ,,go will be determined ~' ~~ 'Y
~ , Dy this` decieion~', ~ ~~ ~~
C i(,~
ON CO2SFIENTS • ~ . ~ o ,_
er =.Clarified this area °ibt~the moat active part of `'the Central
ea` Asked if ~traff,~~,4was considered in ~ va~luatian for Housing ~ ~s
recommendations. Planning Commission is not a polling body;
cally appointed and asked to look at planning issues and ,come to ~.
est decision with regard to land use issues; specifically not to be ~ ,}~?
ed about pxoperty values and are to look at the land uses in `'
nehip to transportation facilities, and balance between employment
Bing, etc.; lived in an area more dense than this area would be;
ids density and compact development; well planned density is not
slides showed the unique character of this neighborhood and some ''r
sigh density developments did not go with the character of the ~"
~ neighborhood. Anaheim has a serious interest in preserving
~ ileighborhoode, many neighborhoods are at a critical stage and at
where they need a good deal of maintenance; Commission can send
that they should cease maintaining their homes and think in terms
atment or send the message they should continue to think of them as
id the city encourage them to invest in rehabilitation and perhaps _~
sport that with loans, etc. and spending its money on services and
as, etc.
a - Gommunitiee are formed 'because people congregate together and
>uteiders coming in and breaching their quality of life strictly
~ofit mok_ive; good planning involves more than just a place for
:o live; there is no open space or park in that area; felt it is
grant the downzoning to RS-5000 and come up with an overlay zone.
Disagreed that density ie not a problem, high density in a low
:ommunity is raucki-different than high density ir. a higher income
creed with downzoning and `overlay zone so people could rebuild ~~'?~ '
~ they have now.
- Suggested with an overlay zone, someone could bring a project in
~d their. case, depending on how the overlay zone is worded.
.on has.. larger charge than individual interests and has to be
rd with growth management and felt downzoning with an overlay zone
,low builders to identify those lots which should be developed with
unite in balance with density.
11/19/90
Page 16
L VOii LCVVNY110!!V
~
"E6y @ Y.. ~~ai~t~( a rf!'~' ? ~,R4~'itt'~M8'rY ru s~~M,~+Ys~• ~ i
e area for RS 5000 zoning, recognizes it as.a housing resource of "
'
~`1
- `
'
~
' '~
~ ti~ ~'
~• x~~
, k
R
b
~ d~~47~ ~`>~1°'°{A~
rT3ir hJ
1~ '~r
.3nk An.'4-t MrG1~~ t 1^"~Lh°P!&
S~ax
gle fam ly homes;~^~etsiving to locate 'apnrtments on larger parcels
~~~'~ b M ~~~Ltii4'yi~~f f~;Y~'E+~ r..5 r .~ d ~nll wrmY.i,+4 ~ ri^"` ri r a ~+ ~ a~ ~' ~ tt~'rt'- •"il ,
000~~e
f
r
th
a
l _,'r ~:~r
~r;~
~
y
,
q ~
o
more);
ere
re severa
programs which focus ,on
-.
`"e
~
!
~
1
k
~
'
+
ti
-
- ~~-
_
sx+
dry»
.a ~ y, at ,
11
0
p
+f
M
+~
~s~•
it F>•
+tT
~ ,r .•.
eownership; and~'they'want to preserve the single-famly
homee~ in th~a +
.
gh
b
orhood; tha~ this area, plus
eoome additional-properti.ee along
Lemon
~
~
{
,
set are discussed .on page '47" of the Housing' Eleme'n`t j that the ..'
nzoni~ng ie.in conformance :with the Houeinq Element '`
.;~ `,
nning Staff - Explained approixmately 10 buildingpermits have been `,
ued since the previous downzoninq t
o RM 2400 to increase the number .of -
_
ts , is
~
_
<:,
ION: Approved Negative Declaration ="n
Granted Reclassification to RS 5000 -+
E: 6 yes vote
(Boydstun - Conflict of Interest)
trotted staff to initiate a study (tentatively scheduled to be
cussed at a December 10, 1990, Commission workshop) bringing forth a
posal for an overlay zone which would:
1. Provide by CUP the ability to allow rebuilding of exie~tinq
structures that were destroyed by fire o'r other natural disaster
2. Provide by CUP the ability to build a second unit, where
appropriate, provided the second unit was proposed in conjunction
with substantial renovation and preservation of an existing unit on
that lot. Where appropriate should be things like alley access,
density, size (maybe 3,000 sq. ft. per unit); rind consider the
concept of architectural conformity.
3. Provide for special code enforcement efforts. f
sal Findings for granting of Reclassification: ;~,r1
~-
,~
A. Housing Element r J;a special emphasis on the preservation of '' ~=
existing housing stock and points out this neighborhood is good '%
opportunity and a better way to provide affordable housing
B. Community character is such that some of the existing multiple ~
is
family developments have been out of character and has created
disincentive for existing homeowners to preserve their property and
would like to stop that. Community character needs to remain;
there are a number of homes in this area which are listed in the
National Register of Historic Places and those are special findingF
made by the USA.
C. Traffic and transportation facilities in this aLC~ are somewhat,'
impacted and allowing continued increased density would cause more
impacts.
11/19/90
Page 17 4
} T
~~ - ' ~
y lf'~4s9~ J 3~'ak1~ .af'~.Mf~'k~'"'icz `f .~ ~ r ~ i _._'n e i 't%a
~ ~1 r A ~,~ /CO~ITION~~ USE PERM22r'~~~ '-b .e r h~i.~' ~tlQ
N0~3096 REOLn+'ST OR A_N EXTEN~r Approved
a~
y~ :~"~'~OF~TiME'~TO'~ceMVrv~.WITH~COND S~OF APPROV r,; ~~~;~'j"" ~,~
jY,,,. 1 ^•+.Aro/rA 1V+Y ,{prp MF.R~ ~1f.a'ud A+'1'-.IT.R'Ce .uwM~f~*x '91Cr"Ml~tltltWµ~ ~ ' ' ~.
J i,~~ ; James Righeimer re - ~~~
,~ ~ ~", u~~~~k y - ~xn~r~e ~A r a„~yon~e jj ye~r~exte~n~sio Hof time for ~A,, ~
Conditional Uee~P~ermit No 3096 Property ie~vlocaL d ~~, '
~,~,/ 3601 West •9a11~ Rd. ~~ r <.
H~7'M~ '~ ~` B~• VARIANCE"' N0 3737 - REOLrmcT :rno TFRMrxrm -r Joh ~ ~''~ ~ ~ ~'F~~,
', , . ,.., _ . -;, ~N ~ . . n ,D Dye ~rantedf
~-' -~ DMST Development re '~ , r<, 4,„
., ~ ''. .. , .guests"termination of~Variance No. 3737.
~. , . ,
F ,: ;,%' ~' Property is .located. at 207, 211,- 217, and 223 Coffman Street.
r ~7-
RESOLUTION N0. _PC90-268`` '~`~~
~`~~ ~ C. ~ ~ ~S ~F C - r. ~ b~,
UCLA SI i ATION N0: 88-89-54` - Nunc dro tune esolut ~~ ` to Granted:; K~
emend leoal d~$criotion contained in Resolution No PC89 111 „'~"~~
` Property located on the west side'of Anaheim Hills Road betwee ~"~4
~ Santa Ana Canyon Road and a point approximately 650 feet north "J1
L of the centerline of Noh1 Ranch Road.
):' '
`' RESOLUTION N0. PC90-269
D. CODE AMENDMENT PERTAINING TO LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS FOR DECK
TYPE HOUSING DEVELOPMENTS
Vote: 6-1 (Feldhaus voting NO)
E. ORANGE COUNTY SOCIAL SERVICES AGNECY REQUEST TO DETERMINE
CONFORMANCE WITH THE GENERAL PLAN PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT
1535 EAST ORANGEWOOD A•JENUE
ITEMS OF PUBLIC INTEREST
ADJOURNMENT•
\; ~
11/19/90
Page 18
Approved :':
(Approved
"^`