Minutes-PC 1990/12/03
,.
ACTION AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
MONDAY, DECEMBER 3, 1990 AT 10:00 A.M.
PRELIMINARY PLAN REVIEW PUBLIC HEARING
(PUBIC TESTIMONY)
10:00 A.M.
1:30 P.M
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: BOYDSTUN, BOUAS, FELDHAUS, HELLYER, HENNINGER,
MESSE, PERAZA
PROCEDURE TO EXPEDITE PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. The proponents in applications which are not contested will have five
minutes to present their evidence. Additional time will be granted upon
request if, in the opinion of the Commission, such additional time will
produce evidence important to the Commission's consideration.
2. In contested applications, the proponents and opponent will each be given
ten minutes to present his case unless additional time is requested and the
complexity of the matter warrants. The Commission's considerations are not
determined by the length of time a participant speaks, but rather by what
he says.
3. Staff Reports are part of the evidence deemed received by the Commission in
each hearing. Copies are available to the public prior to the meeting.
4. The Commission will withhold questions until the public hearing is closed.
5. The Commission reserves the right to deviate from the foregoing if, in its
opinion, the ends of fairness to all concerned will be served.
6. All documents are presented to the Planning Commission for review in
connection with any hearing, including photographs or other acceptable
visual representations of non-documentary evidence, shall be retained by
the Commission for the public record and shall be available for public
inspections
7. At the end of the scheduled hearings, members of the public will be allowed
to speak on items of interest which are within the jurisdiction of the
Planning Commission, and or agenda items. Each speaker will be allotted a
maximum of five (5) minutes to speak.
CA10050E
Page 1
~. ~,
la. CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION Approved
lb. WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT Approved
lc. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 3357 Granted
_°^.:_ :a
OWNER: CHRIS DAGLAS, 15924 Aurora Crest, Whittier, CA 90605
1, ,.~ , ~ ~~
AGENT: CHANGIZ 20MOREDIAN, 705 S. Neptune, Anaheim, CA 92804 --Z,~::~..7•-
~:~ tip; `.
LOCATION: 100 S. Brookhurst Street Units G and H. Property is
approximately 0.41 acre located at the southeast corner of
Lincoln Ave. and Brookhurst Street.
To permit an auto stereo and auto alarm installation store with
waiver of minimum number of parking spaces and minimum structural
setback.
Continued from the November 5, 1990 Planning Commission meeting.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION NO. PC90-270
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
OPPOSITION: None
PETZ7'IONER'S COMMENTS: They are doing installation which is very clean
and neat; will not be heavy automotive and landlord would never allow it;
if they leave the premises they have an agreement with the landlord that
it would convert back to the original store front; they are taking up
parking spaces now for installation and by moving it inside it would
create less parking demand; can move handicapped space over by the donut
shop and ramp can still be used in the evening after they are closed;
everything will be kept very retail looking so if someone should look into
the window it would be neat and clean and if there is a problem they could
tint the window; have spoken to the Fire Department and they need to
reinforce the wall as they need a 2 hr. fire wall so will increase the
thickness of she dry wall; removed signage from windows so they comply
with the 20~; does Commission want them to do bottom portion of the door
to look like the buildings next to them?
COMMISSION COMMENTS: 10 year lease and into it just 1 year; ; traffic
study is adequate, but how about the pa;.king? Considered possibility of a
3-yr time limit, however, would have to come back twice; have a right to
review CUP at any time and would like to see applicant get the 9 yrs; make
bottom portion of door solid to blend in with buildings next to them.
STAFF COMMENTS: Alfred Yalda, Traffic Engineering, stated the existing
use is a retail store and when they exchanged to this use the requirement
for parking remained the same, i.e., 5.5 per 1,000.
Page 2
i~/3/90
~.
=-~ ,
r-~.
ACTION: CEQA Negative Declaration -Approved
_ Waiver of Code Requirement -Approved
(Commissioner Feldhaus voting NO)
' Conditional Uae Permit No. 3357 -Granted for 9 years ';.
(Commissioner Feldhaus voting NO) (y~.`~fJ~:r ii~c~Y~
Add the followina conditions:
~~. -
1. That this be only for installation of auto stereo, radio, alarm and
telephone so it travels with the CUP in case they sell.
2. That if the CUP is to terminate at some time that the roll-up door
be replaced with a normal store front.
VOTE: 6-1 (Commissioner Feldhaus voted NO)
:~
f~
~.
k•
`~
i
~r
k'
7.
a.
S
?i
~i
:~
'1.~
I
~I
Page 3
12/3/90
:c
rTi~t
,/~1
2a• CEOA NEGATrvE DECLARATION
2b. WAIVER OF CODE REO[1IREMENT Approved
2c• CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO, 3359 READVERTISED APProved
Granted
in part
OWNER: BILL TAORM.INA/Ai7AHEIM DISPOSAL, 2761 Whitestar Ave.,
T.naheim, CA 92806
AGENT: WILLIAM WINK/ANAHEIM DISPOSAL, 2761 Whitestar Ave.,
Anaheim, CA 92675
LOCATION: 2751-2781 E. White Star Ave. Property is approximately
1i.5 acres located on the west side of Blue Gum Street,
approximately 37. feet north of the centerline of La Palma
Ave.
To permit the expansion of a. recycling/resource recovery transfer
facility with waiver of minimum number of parking spaces, minimum
landscaped area adjacent to the freeway, maximum fence height and
required improvement of parking areas.
Continued from the November 5, and November 19, 1990, Planning
Commission meetings.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION NO. PC90-271
-------------- _____________
--------------------
FOLLOWING IS A SUM_MARy OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
OPPO_ S_ ITION, 1 .
OPPOSITION CONCERPIS: Neighbor to facility; referenced memo from Code
Enforcement and stated it says there has been only 1 complaint this year;
they have filed numerous complaints with the South Coast Air quality
District; problems with dust generated by vehicle traffic; increase in
volume of trucks make it worse; use to have a street sweeper and afoot
patrol to pick up papers in the neighborhood; odor is a constant problem
and nothing has been effective; grinding wood under a tent with no dust
collector.
PETITIOt7ER'S COMMENTS: Purpose of project is to enlarge an existing
warehouse and recycling sorting facility on their property to accommodate
the increase in recyling programs being implemented throughout the City;
project is in conjunction with a new package that will be before
Commission on 12/17/90 to move their truck parking and maintenance to
another off-site facility to reduce traffic congestion and increase the
availability of parking; the addition of this building will help to
mitigate the dust problem and will provide a sight screen for travel on
La Palma; they purchased a street sweeper about 90 days ago and it runs
everyday; they have a 4-man foot patrol that goes from Kraemer Blvd. to
Sunkist, Miraloma and then back around and is ongoing everyday.
Page 4
12/3/90
' ~
' ; -,~
Attempted to reduce amount of trash to landfill through wood chippin,; '
this is a temporary setup and will be dealt with when this building is
. complete, i.e., they will convert one of the other buildings that is
currently a warehouse and install the wood operation with a bag house and
full dust control; no hazardous materials and waste treatment will not
change, but handled differently once it gets into the facility.
COMMI_. SSiON COMMENTS: Asked staff about the Environmental Impact study;
before construction starts would like to get approval from the South Coast
Air Quality District for the plans that are going to take place; do not
want this to create more of a problem.
STAFF COMMENTS: Environmental staff looked at the initial study and the
information that was provided; determined there would be no additional
impacts from the facility, that basically there was a change in the way it
was being handled rathez• than any increase; expanded initial study
analysis to include not only this project but the proposed off-site truck
parking area which they considered at a later date in the analysis and
with that information staff. determined a negative declaration would be
appropriate; overall concern that some of the site is below grade from the
elevated streets and what method could applicant use to screen that.
Alfred Yalda, Traffic Engineering, stated they had an extensive parking
study for the entire site; they had trucks that are disabled and not
moveable that they park on that site; they propose to remove all of the
disabled trucks, and provide more area for the regular trucks and this
will open up additional area for the employees to park; it will reduce the
overall demand for parking and they will also relocate some of the repairs
off-site.
John Poole, Code Enforcement Manager, stated they have mitigated many
problems that came up and does not see that this will be anything but a
help to the overal]. picture. He stated recycling has caught on and they
should be able to get things squared away.
ACTION: CE_QA Negative Declaration - Approved
Waiver of Code Requirement - Approved in part
Grant Waivers A, B and D
Deny Waiver C
Remove 5-foot fence around the parking area
Conditional Use Permit No. 3357 - Granted
Condition this CUP on the approval of the CUP
involving the moving of the trucks for off-site
parking prior to issuance of a building permit
for this project.
Amend Condition No. 9 to allow for the metal fencing
that currently exists on-site and put a fence
along the freeway; the existing fence is currently 6-foot
high, raise to 8 feet and keep the same type of solid screening.
Nute: Caltrans gave them a permit to redo that.
Pagge 5
i2/3/qo
Ifs
.. ,.,
~ "',
Add condition to have current wood chipping operations
and the bagging facilities on their conveyor belts
in place by June 1, 1991.
There are 2 other stipulations:
1. Continue street sweeping operations daily.
2. Keep 9-man trash collection team that operates daily.
Note: There are no p~-mits for the signs and one of the
conditions of appro~._ is that they are to come back to the
Commission with a Reports and Recommendation item with a
signage program.
VOTE: 6-0 (Commissioner Feldhaus declared a conflict)
Page 6
12/3/90
,, ,
3a. CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION
3b. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1215
.~*.
OWNER: KENNEY GOLF ENTERPRISES INC., 1486 Enderby Way, Sunnyvale,
CA 94087
LOCATION: 3200 Carpenter Ave. Property is approximately 5.89 acres
located on the south side of Carpenter Ave., approximately
55-feet east of thr centerline of Shepard Street.
To permit a 9,804 square-foot addition to an existir:g clubhouse (for
an additional arcade and snack bar area).
Continued from the November 19, 1990 Planning Commission meeting.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
OPPOSITION: None
(1 person spoke in favor representing Dominion Properties
immediately adjacent to Camelot)
PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Family owned business; propose to build a 9,800
sq. ft, addition; built a similar addition in 1984; on Saturday afternoons
and Friday nights, it is very crowded and they need more space; after the
addition they would have 300 parking spaces and that is more than
adequate; currently use 75$ of their parking; have previously contacted
P.D. and asked about hiring off-duty Police Officers and th:.~y were told
they were not allowed to do that.
COMMISSION COMMENTS: Suggest they use off-duty Police Officers if
possible; concern expressed about using only one security guard; parking
appeazs to be adequate,
STAFF COMMENTS: Police Department testified to the amount of cruising in
the area and that it has been cut down considerably; recently changed
their security and they now have someone in a police type uniform;
recommend that they use t:nis type of security out~it and not what they
have had in the past where they wear a Camelot wind breaker; need a
minimum of 2 security guards.
ACTION: CEQA Negative Declaration - Approved
Conditions: Use Permit No. 1215 - (Motion required) Approved
Recommend to ~.ty Council to change the recommendation on page
6 of item no. 4 to state that at least 2 uniformed security
guards shall be resent in the parking lot and strike the word
"private."
VOTE• 7-0
Approved
Page 7
12/3/90
'~• n
4a. CEQA NEGATIVE DECLAR;ITION
4b. WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT
4c. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3336
OWNER: NORWALK INV1'sSTMENTS, C/O STEPHEN WONG, 1020 n. BATAVIA
ST., STE. 8,• ORANGE, CA 9266'7
AGENT: PEDRO GOMEZ, 536 S. ROSE ST., ANAHEIM, CA 92805
LOCATION: 536 South Rose Street. Property is approximately 0.6 acre
located on the east side of Rose Street and approximately
530 feet south of the centerline of Santa Ana Street.
To permit an automobile repair facility with waiver of minimum
number of parking spaces.
Continued from the November 5, 1990 Planning Commission meeting.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION NO.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLAPINING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
OPPOSITION: None
PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Property Manager stated he has made it clear to
Mr. Gomez about the concern as to the outside; have addressed the conce:•n
of stripping out in the front for the parking and have addressed some of
the minor trash maintenance problems in the front; have taken several
steps and stopped by prior to the meeting to look at the 4 properties and
he thought it looked better.
COMMISSION COMMENTS: What about oil and storage in the back that Code
Enforcement shows in their report; does not sound like it is being handled
properly; is back of property asphalt or dirt; should be all asphalt; it
is property management's responsibility to take this back to the owner
that it should be done; do have a Code requirement that the area must be
paved; it is not just Mr. Gomez's activities that are causing these
problems; the property management needs to get the message that the whole
group of uses in that area needed t~ clean up their act and if that is not
accomplished voluntarily then Code Enforcement will be out there; property
manager can set an example and get the tenants to clean up and do their
work inside; they are all there on CUPS and the management could find
themselves with empty buildings; parking along Rose Str=et could be
mitigated by having the owners and employees of the businesses park in the
rear lots where the striped parking is and leave front areas for customer
parkit;g; property manager to get owners and property managers together at
a meeting and get the block cleaned up; anyone who does not cooperate in
the clean up will be brought back before the Commission to look at their
CUP.
Continued
to 2/11/90
Page 8
12/3/90
i
,.~ n
STAFF COMMENTS: Code Enforcement officer stated the back rear lot was
still dirt, there were 5 gallon buckets of oil being stored with discarded
oil and there was oil seeping into the rear property; there was outside
work being done; there did not seem to be room in the rear for additional
parking and she only saw 2 marked parking spaces out in front; John Poole,
Code Enforcement Manager stated it seems like there has been a continual
stream of complaints; they have been out on each one of those properties
on a routine basis; recently Code Enforcement did some sight screening
because just to the east are residential apartment buildings so those
people are directly affected as to what goes on; there is a continual
problem with the tenants working outside performing a variety of work; at
one time all that was paved and apparently over the years something ate up
the pavement; before allowing any other uses, what is there should be
cleaned up; there has been an overall disregard of cleaning up anything
out there and these 4 properties have had more of a share of their
problems than some of the others; each rear yard on plans has parking
shown in it; Code Enforcement would be willing to send an officer to talk
to the property managers and tell them what needs to be done; could get
most of what needs to be done in 30 or 60 days then they could come back
in and Commission could give Mr. Gomez his CUP and they would not
administratively take any action against Mr. Gomez.
ACTION: Continued to 2/11/90; Work with Code Enforcement; turn those in
that do not cooperate and pull them in regarding the revocation of their
CUPS.
Paye 9
12/3/90
~.
5a.
5b.
CEOA NEGATTV~ nECLARATION
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3358 Continued
to 12/17/90.
OW.YER: MOB'2L OIL CORPORATION, 3800 W. Alameda, #2000, Burbank, CA
91505
AGENT: GREER & COMPANY, 2323 W. Lincoln Ave., #127, Anaheim, CA
92801
LOCATION: 1680 West Broadway Property is approximately 0.49 acre
located at the southeast corner of Broadway and Euclid
Street.
To permit a convenience market within an existing service station.
Continued from November 5, and November 19, 1990 Planning Commission
meetings.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION NO.
Page 10
12/3/90
6a. CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION
6b. WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT
6d. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3362
OWNERS ANAHEIM-KOREAN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH, 1408 S.Euclid Street,.
Anaheim, CA 92802
AGENT: HOPE UNIVERSITY-UNICO NATIONAL COLLEGE, P.O. BOX 4818,
ANAHEIM, CA 92803
LOCATION: 1408 South Euclid Street Property is approximately 3
acres, located at the northeast corner of Buena Vista P.ve.
and Euclid Street.
To permit a private fine arts college for gifted persons with mental
retardation, with waiver of minimum number of parking spaces,
required setback for playground, maximum fence height and maximum
structural height adjacent to single-family zoning.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION NO. PC90-272
--------------------------------
FOLLOWTNG IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
OPPOSITION: None
PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Mentally retarded students have been on the
property for the past 3 years; property has been sold to the Anaheim
Korean Presbyterian Church with the provision that they could remain for 5
years while they ra=se a building fund. and move elsewhere; use of property
is not intense and the students do not drive.
Speaker for the Church. Put up sign on Sundays not to park on the dirt
lot; will look into it if it is a problem; do not know of any agreement
with Loara High School to park on their lot; have tried to beautify area
and have painted the shed and put on a new roof, but have no definite
plans; shed currently used as a storage facility, however, can restructure
it or tear it down; do not have any current plans regarding landscaping of
southern portion of property, however, they are open to suggestions; feel
that Hope University is a part of them and that they are doing community
service by providing this facility to them and at the same :ime are
sensitive to the neighborhood.
Approved
Approved
Granted
Page 11
12/3/90
r"1 %-,
COMMISSION COMMENTS: There is no doubt that they have been good
neighbors; there are several things aboue the property that are a problem;
addressed problems relative to the property and not to Hope University;
there is a wooden, hand painted sign on the southern portion that says
"Church Parking" and wanted to know if they were using the dirt lot on
Sundays for parking; sign should come down and there should not be any
parking; is there an agreement with Loara High School to park on their
lot; any plans for the lot; questioned plans for shed on southern portion
of property; shed does not look good; concern about landscaping on the
southern portion of the property; expressed concern about the dumpster
that is sitting out in full view of everyoiae; City Code requires that it
be enclosed in the trash enclosure; Hope University is a great asset to
the church; is there a way they can approve the CUP without the
conditions?
STAFF CGt:.'*.ENTS: Mr. Hastings stated a lot of the conditions can be
deleted, and the ones with the asterisk can be monitored by Code
Enforcement; the only condition that should remain is condition no. 8; the
conditions that pertain to improvements of the right-of-way would have to
be deferred to Engineering and Traffic Engineering.
ACTION: CEQA Negative Declaration - approved
Waiver of Code Requirement - Approved
Conditional Use Permit No. 3362 - Granted
(No time limit)
(Delete conditions, 1,2, and 3).
It was noted that the conditions left are up
to the owner of the property.
VOTE• 7-0
PagE~ 12
t2/3/9U
~ r-.
7a. CEOA MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Approved
7b. WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT Approved
7c. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3363 Granted
3 yrs.
OWNER: CANYON WEST AND VINEYARD MINISTRIES, 333 E. Cerritos Ave.,
CA 92805
AGENT: Phillip R. Schwartze, 27132 Paseo Espada Ste. 1222, San
Juan CA 92675
LOCATION: 5300-5340 E. La Palma: Property is approximately 16.8
acres located approximately 141 feet on the west side of
La Palma Ave. and approximately 141 feet west of the
centerline of Brasher St.
To permit a church facility with waivers of minimum number of
parking spaces atld permitted hours of operation.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION NO. PC90-273
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
OPPOSITION: None
PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: The Anaheim City Code has a provision to allow
churches in the industrial ares; request to move into an existing vacant
office space that has approximately 200,000 square feet; request to
initiate an amendment to Code to be heard at a later time to allow
churches, under certain circumstances, that the City approve this use on a
permanent basis; will invest approximately 20 million dollars in the
acquisition of the property and in addition 2.5 million in renovation;
this will be a complete rehabilitation of the facility and a purchase
acquisition; will also construct a recording and T.V. studio and printing
facility; discussion took place regarding the conditions; CUP applies to
the 2 existing buildings and future expansion into the 2 easterly vacant
lots would be appropriate for a later discussion; church would like to
have a day school; it is not a strong request, but something the church is
very interested in; would be looking at about 120 children, K-12; will be
a total of 4,600 in the 3 services; no bingo.
COMMISSION COMMENTS: Property to the west of driveway that shows vacant
will not be used; would 2 vacant lots be picked up by Vineyard at a later
date; Code says you can only get a CUP for a 3 yr. increment for a total
of 9 yrs. and wanted to know what the plan was; great use of the property,
however, faced with a letter that client wants to purchase the property
and wondered why he would purchase it without any guarantees; if property
is owned and a church wanted to build on it, with a CUP they could go into
any zone; can they go under a permanent CUP because they are going to own
the property; could be a requirement of the Code Amendment; questioned the
proposed use that there will be a day school; was not in the staff report.
Page 13
12/3/9
~~
STAFF COMMENTS: Churches can go into any zone except for the Commercial
Recreational area; CUP for Canyon Industrial Area is the only area in the
City which the CUP is restricted to 3 yrs. and the intent was not to build
churches, but to actually move into industrial buildings until such time
as they are able to find a new location; there is no provision between
ownership and someone who is leasing the building far 3 years; questioned
perking study; if applicant does come back for other uses by way of Code
Amendment it is important that they remember that the accumulated effect
may bring him into more of a mitigated negative declaration or an EIR
Alfred Yalda, Traffic Engineering, stated the site plans shows plenty of
parking; if traffic increases there is plenty of room that they could add
parking without making any changes; will restripe for full size cars; have
one condition regarding alignment of their easterly driveway; i.f intensify
use, they will ask them to realign the ingress and egress on Brasher
Street; traffic signal study should be done and signal installed even
though it would be offset about 140 feet.
ACTION: CEOA Mitigated Negative Declaration - Approved
(Add to mitigation some kind of chart that shows who is
responsible and what the timings will be). Conditions 6 and 7
should be timed prior to final inspection of the property; the
way the mitigation monitoring program is set up is that they
will be incorporated into the conditions of approval; there is
a condition requiring the applicant to meet whatever the
requirements are for the cost of implementation.
Waiver of Code Requirement - Approved
Conditional Use Permit No. 3363 - Granted
1. Limit to 3 years with two 3 yr. renewals
2. Delete condition no. 6
3. Change condition no. 7 to show that a study shall be made
prior to final inspection and that the easterly driveway
will not have to be moved at this time.
4. Change condition no. 12 - exempt national holidays and add
Good Friday; includes day care and school only on Sunday.
In addition the following motion was made:
Commissioner Messe offered at motion, seconded by Commissioner Hellyer and
MOTION CARRIED, that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby
recommend that in a workshop session they discuss the initiation of a Code
Amendment that would permit a permanent use of facilities for church
ownership of land in the Canyon Industrial Area and any other requirements
~ that they deem proper; and to include the concept of a K-12 school
associated with the church and to compare the traffic impacts of a church
versus an office use on the same property.
VOTE: 7-0
12/3g~~014
-~ I ^1
8a. CEQA NEGATIVE DECLARATION
8b. RECLASSIFICATION IQO. 90-91-18
So. WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT
8d. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 3364
OWNER: Dr. MYRON SIMON AND MR. STANLEY, P.O. Box 3182, Anaheim,
CA 92803
AGENT: JOHN O. COTTON, 1408 Third Street Promenade, Third Floor,
Santa Monica, CA 90401
LOCATION: 1334 West La Palma Ave. Property is approximately 0.72
acre located on the south aide of La Palma Ave. and 75
feet at the northerly terminus of Loara Street
approximately 131 feet west of the centerline of Hermosa
Drive.
RS-7200 to RS-A-43,000.
To construct a 55-unit deck type "affordable" senior citizen
apartment building with waivers of minimum lot area and minimum site
area per dwelling unit.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION NO.
RECLASSIFICATION RESOLUTION N0.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
OPPOSITION: 3 opposed and 1 in favor
OPPOSITION CONCERNS: Not necessarily opposed to the type of project, but
to the number of units; traffic impacts; density too intense; La Palma too
busy for senior citizens.
PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Tried to run as an old age home and then tried to
sublease property and it burned down; has been vacant for 15 years; people
have tried to dr.~p things on the property, etc. Went to feasibility study
and came up wi:ii the need for senior citizen's housing which would be
oriented towards a lower rental factor.
COMMISSION COMMENTS: Project too dense; looking at managed growth; should
not be zoned RS-A-43,000; too close to single-family residences; elevators
situated too far away from the entrance; developer should not come in
with something so out of line to see what Planning Commission will do for
them; want to send a strong message to people who would bri~•:g in an overly
dense plan in the hope of negotiating some additional units that the
Commission would not ordinarily give and Commission is nit going to play
that game; need to have a sensitivity to the neighbors; suggest they come
back with a design for condominiums.
ACTION: Continued to 2/11/91 to look at condominium possibilities.
Continued
to 2/11/91
Page 15
12/3/90
~,,,.
~,,
9a. CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION
9b. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3365
OWNER: STANTON MAY, M.D., 1570 E. Glenoak Blvd., Glendale, CA
91206
AGENT: GEORGE SADAGHIANA, 700 N. Harbor Blvd., Anaheim, CA 92805
LOCATION: 1808 North National Street. Property i.s approximately
0.43 acre located approximately 104 feet on the east side
of National Street and approximately 180 feet north of the
centerline of Liberty Ave.
To retain 324 square-foot spray booth.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION NO. PC90-274
---------------------------------------------------------------------
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
OPPOSITION: None
ACT10N: CEQA Negative Declaration - Approved
Conditional Use Permit No. 3365 - Granted
VOTE• 7-0
Approved
Granted
t 2~3/ggo 16
_~
,~
10a. CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION Continued
~ 1G'v. WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT to 1/14/91
lOc. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3367
OWNER: WILLARD LEGG, 1433 East Lincoln Ave.; Anaheim, CA 92805
AGENT; JOHN DALLAH, 17380 Briardale Lane, Yorba Linda, CA 92686
LOCATION: 1433 East Lincoln Ave. Property is approximately 0.16
acre located on the north side of Lincoln Ave. and
approximately 275 feet west of the centerline of Larch
Street.
To permit a real estate office in a residential structure with
living quarters and Waivers of minimum number of parking spaces,
maximum structural height and minimum interior site setback.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION NO.
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
OPPOSITION: None
PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Buying a residential family residence that is
zoned commercial; buying in a mixed zoning area; would utilize house for
office and for living quarters for himself or his caretaker.
COMMISSION COMMENTS: Code allows him to use as a business and living
quarters for hii~~oelf, however, he cannot make the modifications such as
signage; if zoned CL there would not be a problem; prefer the business
owner living in ttie residence and would propose that they limit this to
the business cwner in the suggested Code Amendment.
STAFF COMMENTS: Is currently zoned CO which allows conversion of t..e
house under conditional use permit to an office use. In the CL zone, you
can have a caretaker's quarters in with a converted house to a commercial
use, but in this particular zone there is a provision that does not allow
for the mixture of uses. It is unclear as to whether that means within
the same building or different uses within the same property. It would
depend on Planning Commission's interpretation. Rezoning to CL would
require a General Plan Amendment; currently this is zoned CO and it is
part of the CO zone Code that says no combination of residential and
commercial uses shall be permitted.
Could look at a Code Amendment which would exempt cases where there is a
conversion from a single-family home into an office use to clarify for
future usage; need interpretation from the City Attorney's office;
agendize this for the January 7, 1991 Work Session.
Page 17
12/3/90
..
.r..~Ci
1..:
\ ~1
The Planning Commission made the following request to the City Attorney's
office:
Planning Commission directs the City Attorney's office to determine if a
single-family residence in a CO zone is eligible to apply for and receive
_ a Home Occupation Registration and if not, recommending steps to tak: to
allow the mixed use of commercial ar.~i residential in light of the fact the
CO zone specifically states "no combination of residential and commercial
uses shall be permited.^
ACTION: Continued to 1 •" "
H ~
o
e
o n n c o
~
v, •• o ~
J w ..
~:
3 h 4
ii
y t.:
4 (D a
3 0 X
w u3r•
N ~ E
~ rr O ?
W 0 rr N r•
] w N rt
o ~+ a s O m
~w o z
m ro ~
M~
~ ~ }
°
w o cr '
"
m ~ ~ '`
r
r
~ r
r
~
o m ~ ° .
n
nnu o
~
m ~
w
'•C
N
w ~ o
~ n
0 ~D M H
~ ~ 0 K
~
"
~
x ~
r
r o rt
xm a m z
'
° a ~ G
r
r x
a m 5
a ~
.
m h
m ,c a p n ~
mar• m
`Q
m
m
r
c ~ ~
ro
o "
M m
n n 3 u N
m o 3 N
~ B ~• ~
ro !
N 0 i
rt ~ ~
m
° °
ro ~.
~ °
m a F
m p rt
n p r • e f.
°
~° ro
.
~
aw a
~
~ ''
ro n
w m ~
m a
a
w rr
~`
i
I
i ,
s
PAGE 18 ~;
12/3i 90 f
{~
i ~;~:
~\ /~\
lla. CEOA CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION - CLASS 11
llb. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3369 Continued to-
12/17/90
OWNER: ANAHEIM LAND ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, 450 Newport
Center Drive, #304, Newport Beach, CA 92660
LOCATION: 2420 E. Katella Ave Property is approximately 13.9 acres
and approximately 665 feet on the south aide of Katella
Ave. and approximately 1,470 feet east of the centerline
of State College Blvd.
To permit two freestanding monument signs in the CO (Commercial
Office) Zone.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION NO.
PzI~3/9~
lw~~ ~~~
}~ .
'~. ,--.
12a. CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION Approved
12b. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 14406 (Readvertised) Denied
UWNER: DMP PARTNERSHIP, 1534 Victoria 'Aay, Placentia, CA 9267(1
AGENT: MASSOUD MONSHIZADEH, 1524 Victoria Way, Placentia, CA
92670
LOCATION: 1575 W. Katella Ave. Property is approximately 2.21 acres
located on the north side of F:atella Ave. and
approximately 314 feet east of the centerline of Carnelian
Street.
To establish a 40-unit, RM-2400 (Residential, Multiple-Family) zone
condominium subdivision.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
OPPOSITION: None
PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Approve a tract map which conforms to the site
plan which has been approved by the City for this project; asking that
condition no. 3 on page 5 be modified to prior to certificate of use of
occupancy as it is almost impossible to get those things done to final
map. This project was brought before Council in October with no
recommendation and was brought back to the Planning Commission for some
considerations.
COMMISSION COMMENTS: Most developers meet the deadline for the CC&Rs
prior to certificate of use of occupancy; there have been instances where
they have granted this request and they once granted this to this
petitioner under some very special circumstances.
STAFF COMMENTS: Selma Mann, Deputy City Attorney, stated it is her
understanding that the reason the CC&R requirement has been maintained at
prior to final map approval, is because there is no adequate mechanism for
the trigger at any later point; prior to the final map, it can be
monitored by the Planning Department, but the Building Department
avoarencly does not have a similar procedure set up. She further stated
that the Anaheim City Code requires the Planning Commission to make the
preliminary recommendation to the City Council.
Greg Hastings, Zoning Division Manager, stated there is the problem if a
building permit is issued without a tract map, because basically you are
issuing a permit for apartments because there is no authority to subdivide
the properties.
Page 20
12/3/90
Melanie Adams, Public Wor)cs-Engineering, stated for clarification, the
applicant is asking for a delay of the CC&Rs; she concurs with the Deputy
• City Attorney that this is very difficult to track after final map
approval; previously the cases where the CC&Rs have been delayed were
master CC&Rs developed for some of the ranches and this was incorporated
into their Development Agreement and Specific Plana and there was a
mechanism to follow their projects; this project is very different and it
would cause an added tracking problem.
ACTION: CEQA Negative Declaration - Approved
Tentative Tract Map No. 14406 - Denied
Denied on the basis that it is not physically suitable for the
type of development).
VOTE: 6-1 (Feldhaus voting NO)
^
Page 21
12/3/90
N xL 7e"_.~.I yV'.. .... ..
. ~
,,.,
13a. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO 304 Continued ta'
13b. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 90-91-17 12/17/90
13c. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3356
13d. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 90-02
OWNER: RAR ANAHEIM. L.P., FOUR EMBARCADERO CENTER STE 2600 San
Francisco. CA 94111
LOCATION: 1750 South State Co11eg'e Boulevard• Property is
approximately 11.?9 acres located at the northeast corner
of State College Blvd. and Katella Ave.
Petitioner requests certification of Environmental Impact Report.
ML to CO
To permit two, 200-foot high, 13-story office towers, (289,000
square foot each), one, 3-story, 134-room all-suites (full kitchen)
hotel, a cocktail lounge within a 10,000 square foot restaurant, and
6,000 square feet of specialty service/retail uses including fast
food, in conjunction with one 7-level parking structure and six
freestanding signs with waiver of minimum numk~er of parking spaces.
Petitioner requests approval of Development Agreement.
RECLASSIFICATION RESOLUTION NO.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION NO.
Page 22
12/3/90
;~
r"\
''A~
. - _. ... _... _.. mt7~
14. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
?: ;
A. PROPOSED CODE AMENDMENT PERTAINING TO THE PROHIBITION
ROTATING OR REVOLVING SIGNS - SIGNS - SECTION Approved
18.05.064.060
B. AMENDMENT TO ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 17.06 TO
PROVIDE FOR THE CITY ENGINEER TO APPROVE OR DENY WAIVERS Approved
OF ANY REQUIREMENTS OF THIS CHAPTER
ITEMS OF PUBLIC INTEREST
ADJOURN ENT: Adjourn to work session on December 10, 1990, at
1:00 P.M. in the Planning Department conference room.
s'-
i '.
~:
r
i