Minutes-PC 1991/01/14 (2)~~~
~l ACTION AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
MONDAY, JANUARY 14, 1991 AT 10:00 A.M.
PRELIMINARY PLAN REVIEW PUBLIC HEARING
(PUBLIC TESTIMONY)
10:00 A.M. 1:30 P.M.
COMMISSIONERS PRESSNT: BOUAS, BOYDSTUN, FELDHAUS MELLYER, MENNZNGER,
MESSE, PERA2A
MINUTES APPROVED: May 21, 1990
PROCEDURE TO EXPEDITE PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. The proponents in applications which are not contested will have five
minutes to present their evidence. Additional time will be granted upon
request if, in the opinion of the Commission, such additional time will
produce evidence important to the Commission's consideration.
2. in contested applications, the proponents and opponent will each be given
ten minutes to present hie case unless additional time is requested and the
complexity of the matter warrants. The Commission's considerations are not
determined by the length of time a participant speaks, but rather by what
he says.
3. Staff Reports are part of the evidence deemed received by the Commission in
each hearing. Copies are available to the public prior to the meeting.
4. The Commission will withhold cr!s~etione until the public hearing is closed.
5. The Commission reserves the right to deviate from the foregoing if, in its
opinion, the ends of fairness to ail concerned will be nerved.
6. All documents are presented to the Planning Commission for review in
connection with any hearing, including photographs or other acceptable
visual representations of non-documentary evidence, shall be retained by
the Commission for the public record and shall be available for public
inspections
7. At the end of the scheduled hearings, members of the public will be allowed
to speak on l.tems of interest which are within the jurisdiction of the
Planning commission, and or agenda items. Each speaker will be allotted a
°^S maximum of five (5) minutes to speak.
i
CA10160F 01/14/91
~.1i4:
is
.: 4~!
%iUf.:. '
`4,
' ~L.
~:}~„
~..
la. CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION Continued to
lb. WAIVER OF CODE REOUII{~MENT 4-22-91
lc. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3367
OWNER: WILLARD LEGG, 1433 Eaet Lincoln Ave., Anaheim, CA 92805
AGENTS JOHN DALLAH, 17380 eriardale Lane, Yorba Linda, CA 92686
LOCATION: 1433 Eaet Lincoln Ave. Property is approximately 0.16
acre located on the north aide of Lincoln Ave. and
approximately 275 feet west of the centerline of Larch
Street.
To permit areal estate office in a residential structure with
living quarters and Waivers of minimum number of parking spaces,
maximum structural height and minimum interior site setback.
Continued from the December 3, 1990, Planning Commission meeting.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION NO.
FOLLOWING ZS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
OPPOSITION: None
PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Requested deletion of Condition No. 6 requiring
5-foot utility easement. Use could be handled with Home Occupation
Permit, but no signs are allowed. Zf waiver for sign was granted, would
be able to request Homa occupation Permit and would live on property after
house ie remodeled.
COMMISSION COMMENTS: With Home Occupation Permit, could not be rented to
anyone else. No mixed use on commercially zoned property, eo could not
live there. Suggested applicant meet with staff to determine all the
implications of a Home Occupaction Permit, etc.
ACTION: Continued to 4-22-91
At request of petitioner to work with staff to determine
implications.
~~
i
1
,.-.1 01/14/91
V Page 2
2a. CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION
/. 2b. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 11780-REVISION !1
- \
1
OWNERS BORTIS ET AL, C/0 Stefan Wambach, 1482 E. Lincoln Ave.,
Anaheim, CA 9280
LOCATION: Property is approximately 4.47 acres with a frontage of
approximately 85 feet on the south aide of Rio Grande Drive
and located approximately 306 feet east of the centerline
of Quintana Drive.
To re-establish an expired 7-lot (plus one lot for a private roadway)
RS-HS-22,000 (SC) Zone, single-family residential subdivision.
Continued from the December 17, 1990, Planning Commission meeting.
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
OPPOSITION: 9 people present
OPPOSITION CONCERNS: Grading, drainage, elope erosion and slippage, view
obstruction and referred to previously recorded view easement; property
values, and unstable soil and felt all their homes would be endangered when
thin is graded. Riding trail would be widened and one property owner was
concerned about drainage pipes under hie property; another neighbor was
concerned about a 28-foot high crib wall behind their property; one
neighbor was concerned about drainage across their property.
PETITIONER'S COMMENTSs Crib wall designed based on soil configuration and
would be professionally landscaped and would be an enhancement to the area
to protect property values; when property ie developed, property values all
around it are increased, plus these would be custom built homes; soil and
elopes would be etablized and be better than it ie right now. Tract
approved in 1987 based on soils testa, and that is still valid in 1991.
COMMISSION COMMENTS: 8ouae - asked if they would be willing to grade all
the property at the same time; wants+d to see landscape plane for crib
walla..
Hellyer - drainage for Lota 6 and 7 appears to be towards existing
residences, noted drainage can not be onto someone else's property
(Applicant responded drainage would be into a central drainage System,
along the new street). Wanted to see if condition could be included in
CC6Rs informing buyers that views above would be intruded. Wanted
geotechnical information on the pads.
Continued to
2-11-91
Qa~
r~.,1 01/14/91
~J Page 3
l~yi.
y ,ya„
Henninger - Not comfortable with grading and wanted more details and
information; was not sure adequate building sites could be graded on these
7 lots without additional crib walls, and felt Commission should have final
• grading plane. Did not think existing view easement wauld help these
neighbors; wanted more information on what Parke Departments wants=
Mesas - Agreed more information needed on grading; wanted to be assured
Commission would have opportunity to review plane of what ie proposed in
specific locations.
STAFF COMMENTS: Engineering - Drainage onto adjacent property would
require agreement with property owner; grading plane would not be approved
if adjacent owners do not agree to accept it; applicant is indicating
drainage primarily to the private street and then along the equestrian
trail and then tie into the 24^ storm drain. Drainage ae designed now dose
not have adequate capacity to carry the flow; requested drainage
information with regard to adjacent properties which have experienced slope
elides; geotechnical report required by code prior to issuance of grading
permit; grading and drainage reviewed by City Engineer] would be looking
for substantial conformance with pad locations and pad elevations and all
pads to be graded at the same time. Soils taste submitted were reviewed,
but did not address elide areas. Requested owner to meet with property
owners who experienced elide problems and to submit a updated drainage
report and geotgechnical report.
Planning - explained 18-foot equestrian trail ie shown on plane before the
Commission; however, Parke Department feels 9 feet along the westerly
boundary is sufficient, but 10 feet along Rim Court Drive. ~
ACTION: Continued to 2-11-91 in order for applicant to submit additional
studies and information on drainage, grading, equestrian trail; and
landscape plane, including crab walla.
VOTE: 7-0
I
`y~~.
t
01/14/91
r~
~~.J Page 4
3a. CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION ~,
Approved
3b. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 90-91-19 (READVERTSSEDI Granted, ae
Modified to
RM-3000
OWNERS CITY INITIATED, 200 S. ANAHEIM BLVD., ANAHE?M, CA 92805
LOCATION: 2625 West Lincoln Ave. Property is approximately 1.04 /~~
scree on the north aide of Lincoln Avenue approximately
270 feet west of the centerline of Magnolia Avenue. ~
AM-1200 to AM-2400 or lase intense zone.
I
ontinued from the December 17 1990, Plannin Commission meeting.
C . 9 I
RECLASSIFICATION RESOLUTION NO. PC 91-01
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
OPPOSITION: 1 person present in opposition
25 people present in favor of reclassification
OPPOSITION CONCERNS: Loss of property value) access to property through
Lincoln which is commercial, not economically conducive to low density
' multiple-family development; would propose to develop 28 unite.
PROPONENT'S COMMENTS: Owners of condominium unite adjacent to the north
did not want apartments developed on this site due to existing traffic and
high density in the area creating crime and safety concerns, loos of
privacy, increased exhaust fumes and additional costa to the City for
Police and Code Enforcement. Felt apartments would decrease their property
values. Have not heard from developer and have not seen a plan with access
through their condo project, but willing to meet with developer; too many
apartments on that street now causing overcrowding and overflow parking,
lose of privacy, increased noise and congestion. Wanted to see rezoning to
commercial and a commercial development, rather than apartments. Did not
want existing large trees removed.
COMMISSION COMMENTS: Boydetun - pointed out this downzoning was initiated
by Planning Commission to reduce density.
Suggested condominium project consistent with condo project (Carbon Creek)
adjacent to the north, with possible access through their project and with
them being a part of their association.
Henninger - explained this reclassification was not initiated by Commission
because of general concern for the City, but after owner of property
proposed apartments at RM-1200, then withdrawing that request and agreeing
to meet with adjacent condo owners to work out some plan that would be
compatible, and that was not done. This reclassification ie to .Low-medium
density, not. low density and ie a problem of land use and trying to
maintain the health, safety and welfare of the community.
01/14/91
~~ Page 5
i
Meese - Felt it is unfortunate developer did not meet with neighboring
homeowners' association and unfortunate homeowner's assn. not willing to
~., consider access for a condo project compatible with theirs. Would consider
reclassification to RM-2400 since they did not reach agreement. Would
consider reclaee to RM-3000 if they reach agreement or CG.
Peraza -supports lower density, noted a lot of good people live in
apartments and do not buy homes.
Feldhaue - would like to see rezoning to commercial or lowest possible
residential density. Asked if developer had discussed with owner the
possibility of condo project with access through adjacent condo to north.
ACTION: Approved Negative Declaration
Granted Reclassification to RM-3000
VOTES 5-2
(Commissioners Bouae and Meese voted no)
(wanted access agreement with adjacent property owners to the north
for access through their existing condominium project eo a similar
condo project could be developed on this site.)
4a. CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION Approved
4b. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3368 GrantedY/c~~tJJ
OWNER: CATTELUS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, 3230 E. Imperial, #100, ~~/
Brea, CA 92621
AGENTS LAY RHUN SY, 2500 E. Imperial Hwy., #104, Brea, CA 92621
LOCATION: P ooerty ie avoroximately 26 scree located at the
southwest corner of La Palma Avenue and Tustin Avenue.
To permit a 1,008 square foot doughnut shop.
CONDITIONAL USE PEAMZT RESOLUTION N0. PC 91-02
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
OPPOSITION: None
ACTION: Approved Negative
Granted CUP
VOTE: 7-0
,.., 01/14/91
~,~ Page 6
,~_,~
5
`\
Sa. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 280 (Previously Certified)
88-31 Approved
roved
A
Sb. AMENDMENT NO 1 TO SANTA FE PACIFIC PLAZA SPECIFIC PLAN fSP pp
Approved
~' 5c. REVISED SITE PLAN
OWNER: CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT, 3230 E. Imperial, #100, ~n/'/,, -•
~
Brea, CA 92621 ~ V
~ // .
~~'~''""
AGENT: PHILLIP R. SCHWAATZE, 27132-B PASEO ESPADA, STE. 1222,
San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675
LOCATION: Proae-`•' ie avoroximately 26 acres located at the
southwest corner of La Palma Avenue and Tustin Avenue.
To permit the addition of "warehouse and distribution facility in
support of permitted on-site office uses" and "indoor physical
"
recreational facilities in support of permitted on-site office uses
as accessory uses and structures for Development Area 1.
RESOLUTION N0. PC 91-03
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
OPPOSITION: None
PETITIONER'S COMMENTSs Storage area for the storage old files, etc.; and
on-site, low-density, indoor physical recreation facility for the office
uses, and will not generate traffic. Prima tenant would be using the
facilities.
COMMISSION COMMENTS: Questioned 1E recreation facility would be just for
tenants of this complex; and noted there are a lot of restroome;
(Applicant responded would be tenants of office building and not
hotel)
Bouas - asked about the assembly area and whether that would be a place
for assembly of products or where people would assemble; (Applicant
responded he thought that area is where they would bring the materials to
be stored, and did not think it was proposed as a meeting room and stated
there would be no bingo, church or meetings). Explained site is
parcelized for financing purposes.
ACTION: Approved
Approved revised site plane.
VOTE: 7-0
01/14!91
,.J Page 7
<'~ir
K
,;;,
r t;1:
O
6a. CATEGORICAL EXEMPT-CLASS 11
6b. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3375 Granted
OWNER: ANAHEIM MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, 1111 W. La Palma Ave., Anaheim,
CA 92803
AGENT: SIGN DESIGNERS, 322 S. San Gabriel Slvd., San Gabriel, CA ,I~,~., /
91776 l~j W
LOCATION: Prooerty ie aooroximately 11.0 acres located at the
northwest corner of La Palma Avenue and Weet Street.
To permit two monument signs.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION NO. PC 91-04
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
OPPOSITION: None
PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Explained will be removing the existing pole sign
at the main entrance.
ACTION: Granted
~ VOTE: 6-0
(Souse - conflict of interest)
01/14/91
+.,~ Page 8
+w(+~n4xF"~
r.,
9. REPORTS AID RECOMMENDATIONS
A. TENT:4TIVE TRACT MAP NO. 13716 - REVIEW OF LANDSCAPE PLANS
Hill Williams, applicant, requests approval of landscape
plane on property located on the east aide of Fairmont
Boulevard, approximately 1,120 feet southeast of the
centerline of Santa Ana Canyon Road.
Approved, ~;-t
subj. to ivy
planted on
wall bo pre-
vent graffiti
B. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 89-90-51 - Nunc pro tunc resolution to Approved
correct legal description contained in Resolution No. ~i~~
J.
PC9C-105 granted in connection with Reclassification
No. 89-90-51. Property located on the west side of
Magnolia Avenue and south side of Yale.
RESOLUTION NO. PC 91-06
C. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3352 - Nunc pro tunc resolution Approved
to runend legal description contained in Resolution No. ~.•~~~
PC !)0-259. Property is located at 324 s. Brookhurst street.
RESOLUTION NO. PC 91-07
D. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 3204 - REQUEST FOR A RETROACTIV° Approved ,~~
/~'
EXTENSION OF TIME TO COMPLY WITH CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL -
Greg Hammill, agent, requests approval for a one-year ;~
.r. - - r-'~ ~.._~.,r..r~Cn8~6P1-l1lb4111MM ~ co ....
E, VARIANCE NO 3527 - REQUEST FOR A RETROACTIVE_EXTENSION Continued tr
OF TIME TO COMPLY WITH CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - Gerald R. 1-28-91, in
Bushore, owner, requests a retroactive approval for a ~~1,~%order for
one-year extension of time. Property located at 381 ~~/''~ applicant to
South Henning Way. be present
F. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 2269 - REQUEST FOR REVIEW AND Denied
~'ERMINATION OF SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE WITH PREVIOUSLY ,~/ ~/
$PPROVED PLANS. - Paul Norris, Vice President of LA Fitneea D//
Center, requests review and approval of revised Plane to
pes.'mit a hair salon within a previously approved physical
fit:nees center. Property located at 2560 E. Katella Ave.
G, RECLASSIFICATION NO. 89-90-24 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Denied ~~)~
NO.. 3210 - Request for a retroactive time extension to ~
comply with conditions of approval. Property located at d~1/"
1176 West Katella Ave. (Space Age Lodge). //''
,~
'i~
4
10. ITEMS O:~PU3LIC INTEREST,
NONE 01/14/91
Page 11
r;
~~~~
V Y }' ,
~ ;
Fk
t
t~ '
,`~r.
',`t!.
~~.
~;7
i ~'~
~!„^~+~
.. ( :~11-k~.
...:
~~~yye~;~~p
11. TTFMC FAR nTSCUSSION AS REQUESTED BY THE PLANNING
CONMISSION•
i
a. Consideration of Code Amendment to clarify mixed-use
(commercial/residential) in the CO-tone.
b. Consideration of Code Amendment allowing Home
Occupation Activity in single-family residences in
non-residential zones.
ADJOURNMENT•
Adjourned to 2-4-91, 3s00 , Work Session.
Adjourned at 4s40 p.m.
01/14/91 i
Page 12
i
({"
n~~
rT ~•
)~
., , ,.:>
7a. CE A NEGATIVE DECLARATION Approved
7b. WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT Granted
7c. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 3377 Granted
~\
OWNER: CENTRAL CHURCH OF C!IRIST, 1590 W. Hall Rd., Anaheim, CA
92802 //{~
AGENT: DAVID E. LEWIS, Deacon, P.O. 1098, Weetmineter, CA 92683 V/~
LOCATION: Pro rt is a roximatel 1.76 acres on the south aide of
Ball Road a roximatel 170 feet east of the centerline of
Loara Street.
To permit 4,436 square feet of modular classrooms for pre-school and
day care with waiver of a) maximum structural height b) minimum
number of parking spaces and c) setbacks for institutional uses.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION NO. PC 91-05
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. I ~
OPPOSITION: None (1 interested person present) I '
OPPOSITION CONC~3NS: Concerned about location of children's playground j
and noise and asked if they would play on the parking lot.
PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Explained playground will be located in the turfed
area on the south; explained they do intend to have some hardscape play on
the parking lot; ch.tldren are only outside for recess and lunch break.
Children ages from 2 to 5 years old; and would drive their little care on
the parking lot.
COMMISSION COMMENTSs Boydstun - requested trees be planted along the west
wall. (Applicant agreed).
Meese - questioned hours of operation (Applicant agreed to 6:30 a.m. to
6:30 p.m.)i suggested having some hardscape on the south aide in the
turfed area, with a iandecaped hedge, rather than having them play on the
parking lot. (Appl~aant agreed to keep the children within that one
area, with no play permitted on the parking lot).
STAFF COMMENTSS Code requires that playground area and parking lot area
be set back and advertisement of waiver for the church parking allows them
to encroach into area which ie not ncrmally allowed for a playground. ~`~~~,,,
ACTION: Approved Negative Declaration
Granted waivers ~
Approved CUP, subject to location of playground being .Limited to
south aide, and with a landscape hedge planted; and hours of operation `~
being limited to 6:30 a.m.to 6:30 p.m.
VOTE: 7-0 ~
01/14/91
Page 9
8a. CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATIC..i
8b. CONDI TES'+AL US8 PERMIT NO. 3081 fREADVERTISEDI
~) OWNERS BYUNG HWAN PARK, 2712 Wyckereham Place, Fullerton, CA
- 92633
AGENTS RING DELIGHT INC.,12692 Gardsn Grove Blvd., Garden Grove,
CA 92643
ALAIN BALLY ASSOCIATES, 511 W. Glenoaks Blvd., Ste. 334,
Glendale, CA 91202
LOCATION: i~roperty ie approximately 0.3? acre located at the
northeast corner of Katella Avenue and Bayless Street.
An amendm..nt to conditions of approval pertaining to hours of
operation for a 5,184 square foot restaurant located in a 7,160
square foot, 2-unit (previously 6 unit) commercial retail center.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION N0.
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO HE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
ACTION: Withdrawn by applicant.
Withdrawn
a/~C~