Loading...
Minutes-PC 1991/05/06 ~? ~../ ~ut~tt MEEi'ING of TfO; ANAi~'IM ~ Pr.Ararn~G Cl~lIS510N MONDAY, MAY 6, 1991 lY!' 10:00 A.M. PRFyII~tII4AFE1' PLAN RSVIB9 HJBLIC HEARING (FCIAL7C TFSR'IrXIVY) 10:00 a.m. 1:30 p.m. C1XNMiSSIQNER'S PRFSII~TP: BOUAS, BOYA51T1N, FEf1lTlAfIS, HEGLYII2, f~i~IIVIl~GER MESSE, PF3tAZA P~CEfX1RE Rte EXPIDITE PLANNNIIVG CL1h4ffSSIQN HIRLIC HEARII4GS 1. The proponents in applications which are not contested will have five minutes to present their evidence. Additional time will be granted upon request if, in the opinion of the Commission, such additional time will produce evidence important to the Commission's consideration. 2. In contested applications, the proponents and opponent will each be given ten minutes to present hie case unleea additional time ie requested and the complexity of the matter warrants. The Commission's considerations are not determined by the length of time a participant speaks, but rather by what he says. 3. Staff Reports are part of the evidence deemed received by the Commission in each hearing. Copies are available to the public prior to the meeting. 4. The Commission will withhold questions until the public hearing is closed. 5. The Commission reserves the right to deviate from the foregoing if, in its opinion, the ends of fairness to all concerned will be served. 6. All documents are presented to the Planning Commission for review in connection with any hearing, including photographs or other acceptable visual representations of non-documentary evidence, shall be retained by the Commission for the public record and shall be available for public inapections 7. At the end of the scheduled hearings, members of the public will be allowed to speak on items of interest which are within the jurisdiction of the Planning Commission, and or agenda items. Each speaker will be allotted a maximum of five (5) minutes to speak. CA10610E 05/06/91 Q Page 1 /~ t `o- p. P /'~ 1a. CEnA MITIGATID NE~'IVE DEOlARAZ70N lb. RECLASSIFICIIR'ION hCJ. 90-91-15 READVF.[~7S® I Apptt7VHd GCaIIted lc. WAIVER OF' C-JDE REI7CiIRE~P Apl~.'os+ed 1d. Q7lVD1TIGrTAL USE PECdN1'P lam. 3353 REAWERI2SF.D Granted UVL~2: CITY OF ANAHEIM, C/0 R. ZUR SCHMIEDE, 300 S. Harbor Blvd. Ste. 900, .~ aheim, CA 52805 I[)CA4'ICN: 4 54 ' side of Sanderson Ave and adrnntomately 400 feet south and west of the centerline of Auto Ginter Drive Reclassification of subject property as follows: Portion As Petitioner requests reclassification of (entire 14.54 acres) property from the ML (Industrial), Limited) zone to the CL (Commercial, , Limited) or a less intense zone. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 3353 (READVERTISED)s Portion B: (northeasterly 8;15 acres) To permit a German Social Club (Phoenix Club) with a reetas;~ant with on-premise sale and consumption of alcoholic beverages, .ems-enclosed restaurant with on-premise Bale and consumption of alcoha;.ic beverages, a dance and assembly hall, picnic area, an air rifle :snd archery shooting area, a manager's living quarters (to include musician living quarters), a private school, amusement rides, a beer garden area, a gift shop area, a soccer field, a 50 foot high maypole and 5 storage containers, with A,,, 14,E waiver of minimum number of parking spaces and maximum fence height. RECL1188IFICATION RESOLUTION N0. PC91-55 ~~ ~~'~ /// CONDITIONAL U8E PERMIT RESOLUTION N0. PC91-56 FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY uF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. OPPOSITIONS None PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Request for development of the Phoenix Club at their new location on Sanderson Ave.t Larry Greer, Greer and Compnny, answered questions regarding Hall Rd. and Sunkist; i. e., what are tha improvements that the arena ie making at that intersection se part of ' their mitigation package; they are improving the intersection at the westbound leg to add a third through lane and a second left-turn lane, ' which along with reetriping on the eastbound approach, will accommodate 3 full lanes in each direction with dual lefter this should accommodate the impacts generated by the arena traffic] the traffic that the Phoenix Club adds is minimal and ie lase than 10 to 15 care during the p.m. peak hours because moat of their activities start later than that= engineering ie drawing up the construction plans for that now. ... ; 1~./ 05/06/91 i Page 2 , Mr. Kline, President of Phoenix Club, stated the total equnre-footage of their existing activities is approximately 25R eq. ft., eo they are adding 2R eq. ft. to make it more comfortable; they do nat expect an increase in ~: the participation of their operations. COMMISSION COMMENTS: Meese - they discussed this mcrninq, the way the parking study addressed the increased square-footage of the Phoenix Club; they had a facili~:y that was about 22k eq. ft., and now they are going to about 27R aq. ft., and the parking ie going to be about the same if they get the parking agreement with Coldwell Banker. Mr. Bennett - The parking demand that they projected was not based on the square-footage, but on the activities and attendance expected at each activity; the Phoenix Club ie telling them, in terms of their attendance levels, the numbers do not vary a whole lot. Meese - With a larger, nicer, structure, would they not be looking for increased attendance? Mr. Bennett - He would have to defer that question to the Phoenix Club. He stated the impression he had ie that some of tha facilities that they had are cramped, eo they are going to be spreading out ae opposed to expanding the amount of activities. Meese - will noise level from band shell impact the horse stables? Mr. Kline - It is the northwesterly direction and will not interfere with /~ the stable. ........ .rr. r._ ~~.~. Rob Zurschmiede - There is a m~tigatiori me`asure' F'eted' in the'tregattve~• •~ declaration that deals with the subject of noise and preparation of a study to address that specific issue; it ie tough to design the acoustics without actually having the working drawings completed and that is something that typically takes place further on in the design process; a specialist needs to be brought on board in order to project the noise away from the surrounding uses that might find the noise objectionable. He added the club would be happy to stipulate to that by adding it to the list of conditions for the conditional use permit. STAFF COMMEN~s Rob ZurSchmiede, Redevelopment, gave a brief overview of the project. He referenced page 3 of the staff report, item 8. He stated it indicates that no further development of the eouthweeteriy 3.39 acres of the Rancho Del Rio Horse Stable property ie proposed at this time and for clarification he added no further development is proposed. On page 8 of the initial study, mitigation no. 1 refers to the music pavilion and in the staff report it refers to the garden pavilion; for clarification, they are one in the same. He clarified that the musician's quarters ie an existing use and not a new use. They are proposing a condition that would allow for additional review of the parking if required and a reciprocal parking arrangement which ie another condition. di., ~: U 105/06/91 Page 3 - R..:.,' Traffic Sngineerinq agrees to all of the condit~.one. Sid Lindmark, (last name not spelled for the record) PBR, gave an overview n of the list of mitigations that are being required. R. ZurSchmiede stated the Planning staff has informed him that all of the ~~ V listed mitigation measures will tie incorporated as conditions to the CUP. He stated the environmental doc.unent did not identify specific mitigation measures for noise impacts, therefore, it would probably be a good idea to indicate that a professional acoustic engineer be retained to advise on the design of the outdoor loudspeaker system when the system is designed. Bruce Freeman, Code Enforcement - The established Bound level ie 60 dbas, (using the A scale) at the property line, 3 feet from any wall or structure and the sound would have to be emitted for a period in excess of 3 minutes. ACTION: CEQA Mitigated Negative Declaration - Approved Reclassification No. 90-91-15 - Granted (Staff has use restrictions on this reclassification and they are part of the motion). Waiver of Code requirement - Approved (Adding parking agreement prior to building permits) ~~nditional Use Permit No. 3353 - Granted (Change Condition No. 4 to read "gr+~* to buildinc oermite") (Add condition no. 4 to the list in condition no. 14) (Change condition no. 15 by eliminating condition no. 9 from the I=ot) (Add the full list of mi*_igations to the conditions for the CUP - to include the condition added regarding the sound acoustics) V0~' gas 7-0 05/06/91 Page 4 ::i~~t.~ .~,T 2s, (!aT'FYY)RT[!A~ F.7fEi~1'IQ'~1 SEL"1'ION 15061 fb13 ~ 2b. WAIVER OF Q7DE RB7AIRZ~T1' 2c. QxIDITIQNAL USE PERMI'P Imo. 3402 CW[~2: CAMPANULA PROPERTIES, INC., ATTNs Jack Stanaland, 1590-10 S. Pacific Coast Highway, Laguna Beach, CA 92657 IpCffi'ICXV: 1400 S. Douglass !d>3d. Property ie approximately 25 scree located on the east aide of Douglass Rd. and approx 1080 feet north of the centerline of Ratella. To retain an existing 236 apace mobilehome park containing 219 coaches with waivers of minimum front yard setback, minimum aide yard setback, minimum rear yard setback, minimum number of parking spaces, maximum fence height and waiver of Council Policy No. 542 Continued from the April 6, 1991 Planning Commission meeting. CONDITIONAL U8E PERMIT RBSOLUTION NO. PC91-57 FOLLOWING ZS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO HE CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. OPPOSITION: None ~,,, PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: This was continued because there was an item t ~ having to do with a second 10-foot wall barrier) the problem has been solved and the condition was eliminated] their main concern ie the parkin variance= since they were here last time, the Planning staff added condition no 4, page 8 of the staff report= they do not have any power over this condition and he dose not represent the legal owner; the Planning Department recommended denial of the waiver regarding tha parkins epacees the Traffic Department is in the policy of recommending denial if there ie not strict compliance to the Codes there is nothing that would indicate there is a parking problem= they submitted a report by DRS Associates and their conclusion is that there is no parking problem and that there is adequate guest parkings in order to strictly comply with the Code, they would have to eliminate some of the mobilehome unite, thereby displacing some of the tenants. There is 33 years left on the land lease so there is a limitation on the lease itself. COMMISSION COMMENTS: Boydetun - has no problem with the parking as 16 of the mobilehomee aro double widee and this would only cause them to be short 3 spaces. Feldhaue - asked staff for a definition of the dedicatio of the utility easement and they could not give him an answers it was suggested that Utilities give their reasons for the dedications Masse, drove by the area at least 6 times over the weekend when you would expect the most parking and there is no parking problem. ~~~i~/ 05/06/91 P~qe 5 t ~i1}(v' JC~ 4 • ~ 4',' ~ ~€^ ~~6 ~. r~ q. ~'~'W 4: ~~~ ~4~~~~ °~~, ,. J y,- ..~. ~.;. N:i+. :: t n~::' ~.YN ~; 3r 1,~ '' h': .j~. Ya , ' Zh aTAFg CONMENTSS Applicant was not available at the IDC meeting and the Utilities Department added the condition. Mr. Haetinge -Spoke with Utility pereonnelr they have asked that condition no. 4 be deleted because the easement would not be necessary until such time ae the undergrounding district ie formed out in the area, and it is questionable as to whether this property would be included in that. ACTION Categorical Exemption section 15061(b) 3 - No action Waiver of Code Requirement -Approved Condit+onal Use Permit No. 3402 -Approved I (Eliminate Condition No. 4) VOTES 7-0 i 05/06/91 Page 6 .,:,~ .a:. i~~~,~~, ~. ~r,~S ~~` '~`~' ' ~. ~~' .,a ~. t~ ;; y 'y+z} ?~',5~. ,.,;~: -,'. 3a. 3b. u ,~ Fr~r s~TF'r~xrrr~nr Nt3. 90'91-18 3c. w ~~ OF (17DE RFXXI.' 3d. ~ rnnmrriwnT. USE PF~~' 3e. V~'~7P4 OF Q7[INCIL FtOIdCY Nb 543 CWI~R: Dr. Myron Simon/Mr. Stanley, P.O. Box 3182, Anaheim, CA 92803 11GQ~lP: JOHN 0. COTTON, 1408 Third Street Promenade, Third Floor, Santa Monica, CA 90401 LOiC1f!'IGYJ: 1334 West IS Palma AVe. Property is r•{,~iroximately 0.72 acre located on the south aide of La alma Ave. and 75 fee on the northerly terminus of Loam S,.reet approximntely 13 feet west of the centerline of Hermosa Drive. RS-7200 to RS-A-43,000. To construct a 55-unit deck type "affordable" senior citizen apartment building with waivers of minimum lot area, maximum structural height and minimum site area per dwelling init. Continued from the December 3, 1990 and February 11, 1991, Planning Commission meetings. '~ ~•~~ EECLASSIFICATION RESOLUTION N0. COIIDITIONAL 178E PERMIT RESOLUTION N0. V iTlttlllled t0 ne 17, 1991 ~` 05/06/91 Page 7 'jr..'. , ~r t~ ~^'., ~.../ ~d 98. 4b. W[4pITI(XJpy USE PERMIT N0. 3381 Cf9[~[it STEWART GREEN AND ASSOCIATES, Attn: Rosalie McCormick, 2180 S. Lincoln Ave., Anaheim, CA 92806 I0C.84'1Lr1: 9tad F Li+~ln Ave Property ie approximately 27.1 acres located at the southeast corner of Lincoln Ave. and State College Blvd. To permit the division of an existing retail unit. Continued from the February 11, 1991 and March 11, 1991, Planning Commission meetings. CONDITIONAL UBE PERMIT RESOLUTION N0. FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE i CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. OPPOSITION• None PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Stuart Green is anxious to get traffic mitigation meseures taken care oft Stuart Green ie bound by the terms of its lease with Ralphe and is required to comply with that leaeet had some difficulty with getting Ralphe to agree to the plane ne drawnt the City expressed eom concerns regarding the medians the plane were redrawn and sent to Ralphet they have been in touch with Ralphe on a regular basset the plane have bee approved verbally and they are awaiting for the written approval of the plane. Would like a continuance for the construction drawings to be prepared and the contracts put in place. ACTION: Continued to 6/3/91 Continued to 6/3/91 ~/~ i 05/06/91 Page 8 .,. ~F~l ,' ~~ ~./ 58. 5b. WA1VF~t OF GYlDE REt7f1IRfl~Nl 5C. CCNDI47CX~IAL USE PF.[d~f[T NC1 3387 ;+;Y ~~``t~ 1.~3(LLO~ Din{ed UV(~2: Lincoln Center Saet, Attn: G. Jabara, L.A.C.T.C., 6045 Slaueon Avenue, Commerce, CA 90040 AGQ~l: Jerome euckmelter and Associates, 23534 Aetna Street, Woodland Hills, CA 91367 ZOCA7'ICk1: 1901 E. QeflteT Street. Property is approximately 0.51 acre located on the northeast corner of Center Street and Coffman Street. To permit a cellular telephone facility including a 60-foot high monopole with waivers of minimum number of parking spaces and required yard setback. Continued from the February 25, 1991 and March 25, 1991, Planning Commission meetings. CONDITIONAL USS PSRNIT RESOLUTION N0. PC91-58 FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO HS CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. OPPOSITIONS None PF.TTTIONER'S COMMENTS: Reduced monopole from 60 feet to 50 feet= there ie a platform upon which cellular antennae would be mounted; it was indicated that the length of that panel ie 11-1/2 feet, however, it ie actually 8 feet] they have looked at other sites. Some of the difficulties regarding a real estate transaction such ae this aces This ie a public utility and their lease agreements are not like regular leases; they are very different from other uses such as an office use; they may require eseemente across eomeonee property and through someone's building to give them the right to fix their equipment if need b~ etc.; they require a 20 year term and it dose restrict the future use of the property, therefore, it ie difficult to find willing landlords to leas apace to them and give them eseemente they may require. Presented a propagation study to the Planning Commission at the last hearing where they showed the reason for this particular site; this Bite i essential at this specific location because it ie a grid point for their system; each site has a very specific location; numerous owners were approached and the only one (the one they are dealing with now) ie the onl one that would allow them to sign a 20-year lease with the necessary easements. V~/~-" r 05/06/91 Page 9 __ -. o...~ .~, It was been brought to their attention that it was zoned CO and, therefore, would require a zoning variance= they were unable to find a piece of property that might be easier from a zoning standpoint eo they went ahead with the zoning variance proceseJ they did approach the Yellow Cab Company because of the existing antennae, but they received a letter saying they were unable to accommodate the request. The electronic switching equipment will qo inside of an existing building on site, eo that will not be visible] the only thing that will be visible evidence of this facility ie the pole= (Photos were passed out to the Commission regarding the balloon study). He supervised the balloon study and it was tethered at 55 feet rather than 50 feet just in case of Windt h~ realizes that the Commission dose not like to have these polar in proximit; to reeidentialt to the south and west is commercial and to the north ie multiple reeidentialJ basically they have commercial on 3 sidest they picked the beet possible site they could that was available] the pole will be a customized pole, tapered and painted a light pastel blue= they need t service the area. COMMISSION COt9~lENTS: Feldhaus - What guarantees are there that there will be no interference to other receivers in the immediate vicinity? Mr. Hare - L.A. Cellular ie governed by the FCC and within those quidelinei they designed their system eo it specifically will not interfere] their frequency ie in the UHF (channel 62) and the signal strength ie very weakt they are using known frequencies and a very low transmit powart they have built over 200 sites and, they have even placed them in places from Beverl, f,,, Hills to Dana Point located in medical buildings with very sensitive X-ray ~Y~ equipments to date they have nothing on record of any interference problems. Meese - From this point what ie the radius that this tower could be located and still give the correct coverage? Mr. Hare - Going to the east "0"= to the west within approximately 1/4 mi. from the existing location] to the north "0" and to the south approximately 1/4 mi. They p-e implementing a new technology, digital cellular technology] they are doing testing now and expect Co go Commercial in December, therefore, being on grid be::omee essential to this new technologyt in Anaheim they do not !:eve as many sites occurring ae frequently ae in the west aide of Loe Angeles. )1CTIONs CEQA Negative Declaration - Approved (House abstained) Waiver of Code Requirement - Denial (House abstained) Conditional Use Permit No. 3387 - Denied (Boydstun NO and House abstained} VOTB: 5-2 (CUP) _i :.; .,~c ,: ~ `./ 05/06/91 Page 10 ',;~' 6H. CAA 1~'IVE DE~LARAR7QN 6b. WA2VII2 OF DUDE RFXJUIRII~Ial' 6C. QJDIDITICNAL USE PEf7AfIT 1Vt3. 3382 CWI~12: HARVEY OWEN, P.O. SOX 1034, Tustin, CA 92680 LfX,~!'I(XJ: 1152 North Rz~emer Blvd. Property is approximately 0.17 acre located on the east side of Kraemer Blvd. approximately 580 feet south of the centerline of Coronado Street. To permit an industrially-related office building with waiver of minimum structural setback. Continued from the February 11, 1991 and March 11, 1991, Planning Commission meetings. COMDITIONAu UBE PERMIT R68OLUTION M0. FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. OPPOSITION: None PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Applicant did not show, however, staff indicated that he knew there was a hearing today. i COMMI38ION C.IMMENT3s Does recommendation still stand for a turn-around? STAFF COMMENTS: Rod Hallock, Maintenance, stated due to the traffic at this location, trash pick up should not be serviced off of the street for 'I its camnercial trash service; they have conditioned an on-site turn-around', or some means of getting in and out without stopping on the street. At the last meeting they were asked to go back and talk to Utilities and look for some means of engreseing and egreseinq the property, however, he has not personally heard from them. There ie an alley or roadway that appartently belongs to Utilities to get into the substation and if he coup access there, it would make it easier for him to have more development on the lot and still be able to pull in one drive and out another rather than try to do it all on the site. All of the other commercial bueineseee in that area have their trash picked up on-site and not on the street. ~1 O',-•, to 05/06/91 Page ii i i .?~; . ,,z,~ ;; Tom Ricker, Electrical Engineering. They discussed this with the owner in the past and told him if he redesigned the building he could build. At th /''~ present time with the footage, he would be in violation of General Order 9 l ~ for overhead safety orders for the State of California. Thay moat maintai i a vertical distance of 12 feet above the highest walking surface on the ~ building or 6 feet horizontally off of the builidng= hie construction i showing the building at 33 feet high, would not give them sufficient clearance. They measured everything and it would require that the propert be undergrounded or that taller poles would have to be in a reconfiguratio for all substation getaways which is very costly. Their position ie that this be denied unless he could build according to the regulations. He mus lower it by approximately 3-1/2 to 4 feet in order to meet the clearance o 12 feet. ACTION: Continued to 5/20/91 (TO be the last continuance) ti.,./ ~.J ~y,;,.,~ r ... - 05/06/91 Page 12 ~r '' -ev; 78. CQ3A MITIGAR'ID NFF~'IVE DEULARARI'QN 7b. WAIVII2 OF ~)DE RECt/IRE~IP!' 7c. QxID1TIQNAL USE PF.FMIT Nb. 3373 Cf1T~i: MITTON JOHNSON et al, 1214 West Ratella Ave., Anaheim, CA 92802 AC~l~I1': K. OSTOWARI, 6263 E. Twin Peak Circle, Anaheim, CA 92807 LOCAZ'ICriT: 521 South Mandfester Ave. Property is approximately 2.1 acres located on the southwest corner of Manchester Ave. and Santa Ana St. To permit an auto dismantling and auto storage yard and a temporary office trailer in conjunction with an existing auto repair facility with waivers of minimum structural setback and required improvement of parking area. CONDITIONAL USS PERMIT R880LUTION N0. ~~ FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. OPPOSITION: 2 OPPOSITION CONCEANSS None Note: 2 interested parties were present and expressed their concerns regarding this matter. Mr. Palai stated he and hie partner leased the property and decided to get a dismantling license; an application was obtained; Me. Westbrook checked the map and told him this place was no good for a dismantling yard, but an impound yard was permitted; his partner took the application to the office and changed "no" to "and"; he hoe the orginal and a copyf now it says it i good fos impound and dismantlingf he took it to the license department and gut a license (he submitted a copy to the Commissioners); hie partner sent h.'~s nephew and the nephew signed in place of hie uncle. PETITIONERS COMMENTS: Rudo oetowari, stated since 1962 this property hoe been auto dismantling, auto wrecking and body repair and related buienees; 1n 1987 the southern portion of the premises was leased with the understanding that there is no land use objection; in 1987 the business wa awarded the Anaheim Beautiful award; in 1990 the buslnese did not renew an the City said that the subject property did not have a land use permit for an auto wreck shop for all of those years; in 1990 they filed for a CUP which was scheduled for April 8th and continued to todayf for 6 months his client could not make any major business decisions because of the uncertainty of the situation. `./ 05/06/91 Page 13 `,{~ Mr. Kent - owns master lease at 500 and 520 S. Wainutl they have been in business at the 500 address since 1962 in th6 capacity of dismantling, towing, etc. Decided to split the property in half and have a separate business entering on Walnut or onto the Manchester aide to alleviate some o: the congestion on Santa Ana Street; a dismantling license eras issued in 19871 they had a dismantling license in the front yard of 500 Walnut since 1962 and since 1987 in the back portion of the property; subsequently the businesses in the back were sold to the 2 Qentlemen who are in conflict an this is a dispute among partnersl put in over 1/2 million dollars into the propertyl was not aware there was n problem with the zoning and then found out as a result of the feud between these 2 partners that there was a 11et of things the City wanted him to comply with. Mr. Elyaszadeh stated at the time they purchased the business from Mr. Ken in April 23, 1987, they had a clause in their contract that within one-yea if tlsey hear about any problems about obtaining a license from the City they would be entitled to get a refund and call the deal off and they waited for one yearl at the end of the one year they renewed the license; the 3rd year they were in dispute. COMMISSION COMMENTS: Mesas - the Commission ie here to decide on land issues. Henninger - would you like to see the wrecking yard use continued there and Mr. Palai indicated he would not and would prefer '-c sell flower and have a nursery, but hie partner prefers a dismantling license; Meese - up until the last 2 years this has always has been a. rather attractive business, however they are not maintaining the same appearance that they did in the early BO~s and that ie because they have allowed too many peopl /'~ to come aboard; too much intensification. Henninger - would like to see ~ DMV documentation regardi~.tg dismantaling. .~ STAFF COMMENTSs Peggy Flannigan, Code Enforcement - ae far ae the records show, she cannot find anything to permit dismantling at that propertyt there is dismantaling occurring at 2 different businesses (Anaheim Motors and W&W Auto Parts). On February 20th Code Enforcement and Zoning staff met with the business owners and gave them a list of Code Enforcement findingel it was her underetarding that they were going to try to take car of everything they could before the hearing and upon follow-up inspection on April 3rd, it was determined that one :sacs had been secured and paints out of the list of correctional they have a total of 17 unperniitted signs; DMV investigator stated there was no dismantaling license for W6F' Auto Parts and the diemantaling license for Anaheim Motors was surrendered. CA TIONs Continued to 6/3/91 (To work with Code Enforcement) ~./ I 05/06/91 Page 14 sa_ ~3; .. sa•CEbA ~~t1~fS .~~ ~ ( '~ '~'' ~ '___ ~ 'yT f^ 8b. WAIVEfi OF GnDF. RE17[IIRFMf'N!' 8c. rrEtnTmTnN~r. rts~ t>~ALiT N0. 3405 (READVF~II'ISIDJ ~y 7 "'_~- CWl~2: GEORGE GAVE, 30001 Crown Valley Pkwy., Laguna Niguel, CA 92677 a~(.aQ~1P: MICHAEL R. JOHNSON, 22305 Rolling Hills Lana, Yorba Linda, 92687 jip~j(x]; Fm E Ozanaetharpe Ave. Property ie approximately 0.8 acre located on the north aide of Orangethorpe Ave. i and approximately 1435 feet west of the centerline of Raymond Ave. To expand an existing 6,500 square foot restaurant by adding a 900 square foot addition with waiver of minimum number of parking spaces and waiver of required dedication. PC91-59 N N0 ~//~ . CONDITIONAL USB PERMIT RESOLUTIO FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO HE CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. OPPOSITION: None ~ PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Proposing a 900 square-foot addition (enclosed patio room) on the west side of the existing buildingt the addition ie necessary in order to stay compatible with the restaurants in the area] presently has BS parkl.ng spaces and will lose 5 spaces due to construction nn the west aide, however, with the reconfiguration of the parking stalls from 9' X 19' to 8'-1/2" X 18', they will have 103 spaces with an increase of 14 spaceet would like to waive the dedication ae outlined in condition no. 7r he does not own the property and in speaking to hie landlord, hie landlord feels he should be compensated for the lose of this propertyi he ie not changing the use of the land and, therefore, there is no reason for the dedication. STAFF COMMENTS: Melanie Adams, Public Works-Engineering, suggested they delete condition no. 7. ACTION: CEQA Mitigated Negative Declarat•.ion - Approved "`* Waiver of Code Requirement - Approved Conditional 'Jae Permit No. 3405 - Granted {Delete condition nc. 7) yam.,: 7-0 05/06/91 Page 15 • i .. ~ , 9a. n 9b. WAIVF32 OF Gt1DE RECXJ~Tl' t 9C. C_L'IQDITICNAL USE PERMIT Imo. 3403 U/I1Q~2: FRANK and SARAH MINISSALE, 111 South Mohler Drive, Anaheim, CA 92807 1Y~11': THOMAS BIEVIET, 100 South Anaheim Boulevard, X310, Anaheim, CA 92807 LOG~YL'ILYV: 111 South MC,hler Drive. Property ie approximately 1.2 acres located at the southwest corner of Santa Ana Canyon Road and Mohler Drive. To permit apre-school for up to 240 children with waiver of minimum landscaped setback. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION NO. PC91-60 FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE :~NING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO S8 CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. OPPOSITIONS 3 1 in favor /"* ~,~; OPPOSITION CONCERNS: Would like property to remain residential and be developed that wayf have concerns over increased traffic because the day care center would mean an additional 500 trigs daily onto Mohler Drivel Resolution No. R-283 approved in June, 1970, assured residents prior to annexation and subsequent to annexation that this area wouJ3 be maintained low-density for residential purposes= this property has b.en denied a zoning change twice previously in 1984 and in 1985. Please uphold the residential zoning. Requested a 2 week continuance in order for area residents to meet with the rep ae plans were e!ot available until late Thursday and very few of them have seen them. (Applicant did not want a continuance). Concerned about child safety ae far ae the traffic is concernea at the intersection of Mohler Dr. and Del Giorgioi request line-of-site drawings be provided from the point of entrance and exit to the project for visibility purposes. u P/,(uJ 05/06/91 Page 16 .: ~::r ~,y~~~ 'a~~, PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: This matter had been continued from the PC meeting 2 weeks ago for the purpose of presenting revised plane that would ~ hopefully mitigate concerns regarding traffic conflict points and driveway access for the proposed child care facility] they have presented fairly significant and substantial evidence that this area would be greatly served by a child care facility at the proposed location in view of the substantial development that will be occurring to the east] according to population and census figures, Anaheim Mille ie below, ae far ae percentages, the amount of child care facilities compared to the rest of the City west of the 55 Freeway] this facility should be in place without any adverse affect on the surrounding properties and will in fact be a welcome addition to the area. ~~ ~` ,~ They have presented 2 alternatives= one is a single driveway alternative that would align the Mohler Drive/Dal Giorgio Road intersection which contains an on-site turn-around area for engreee and agrees off the site off of one drivewayt the second alternative provides for a 2-driveway alternative, again with one driveway aligning opposite Mohler Drive/Dal Giorgio intersection and the other driveway being closer to SACR. The applicant would be willing to perform either alternative. Apparently atop signs at the Mohler, Del Giorgio intersection are not considered adequate and suggested Traffic look at a potential eignal at that intersection as means of alleviating their concerns. COMMISSION COMMENTS: Recognize day care for the area is needed, however, the traffic situation is bad by Mohler and there ie concern for the children's eafetyt a deal ie a deal ae far ae the local homeowners are concerned, and this ie probably the wrong lot. STAFF COMMENTS: Alfred Yalda, Traffic 8ngineerinq, stated the intersection in question will not meet any traffic eignal warrantt they have a set of guidelines by the State of California, Department of Transportation, and based on those guidelines they install 0raffic signals. ACTION: CEQA Negative Declaration - Denied Waiver of Code Requirement - Denied Conditional Use Permit No. 3403 - Denied (Denied based upon the safety facore ae mentioned and the traffic problems, in that they are unable to mitigate the issues). rr vOl'~: 7-0 .. ~.~,t ~S~>:.~y. 05/06/91 Page 17 s , :s,5~,w ~q+KS± 10a. lOb. WAIVFIt OF CODE RFXJUIR~N1' SOC. GYXVDITZCC~11lL USE PEFMI'1' NO. 3407 CW[~2: BAADMORE REALTY INVESTMENT COMPANY LTD, A California Limited Partnership, 721 Santa Monica Blvd., Snnta Monica, CA 90401 AGENTS ROBERT J. SAVAGE AIR, 209 E. 15th Street, Santa Ana, CA 92701 I~OC1~I'I(xT: 270 E. P81ais 187. Property is approximately 4.69 acres located on the south aide of Palaie Road and approximately 710 feet east o the centerline of Anaheim Boulevard. To permit a 20,000 square-foot church facility in an existing industrial building, with waiver of minimwo number of parking spaces. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AISSOLIITION N0. PC91-61 FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THB PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. OPPOSITIONS None ~ ACTION: CEQA Negative Declaration - Approved Waiver of Code Requirgsnent - Approved Conditional Uee Permit No. 3407 - Granted (Delete can~lition no. 4) VOTgs 7-0 ,_;~ ^; kl .~ ~tiw,. ;.•,:,, r~L ay~4 f h `~:' l ~ V ~, [!F2~A ~am~mg_r~nrrv g~g+p CLASS Ir ~, rt~nrnrTrnnrAr. qs~ pip ND. 3408 r : ;~ ~: . ,` ~~:. ,~~~ ~~;~ n ~.; .. ~;~'~; k~! {~• S ]~. ' 1 r ~ ` ` ~. t ~ ~ ly w~ Z'~~ _ i4~TJ~..', ~~~'. ~~. 4; , G ranted arf 2 yrs. GINNER: VERSURG FAMILY TRUST, 145 Jewell Place, Orange, CA 92666 . 1lCFNP: DONALD D. VERSURG, 1460 N. Red Gum Street, Anaheim, CA 92806 IrOCAI'ICN: x460 IVOI't11 Ind Q1m SYz~et. Property is approximately 2.88 acres located on the east side of Red Gum Street and approximately 810 feet north of the centerline of La Jolla Street. To retain a temporary office trailer. D~/~ FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. OPPOSITION: None CT O s CEQA Categorical Exempt Class ZI - No Action Conditional Use Permit No. 3408 -Granted (2 years) VOTEt 7-0 CONDITIONAL UBE PERMIT RESOLUTION NO. PC91-62 THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO B8 I 05/06/91 Page 19 rs:-s ,~, ~: 2 ~~ Tz s. ... ~j ~~ LY~ .: i, J +3 ;.; ~-t~. 12a. C~OA NEGATIVE DECLARATION pproved ~ 12b. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3410 Granted I OWNER: CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT, Attn: John Law, 1065 Pacificenter ~ Drive, f200, Anaheim, CA 92806 I~ATICxI: 1071 North Rlrstin Ave.. #`106 (SAfits F14 PaCifiJ,. Property is approximately 26 acres located at the southwee corner of La Palma Ave. and Tustin Ave. To permit a 1,587 square foot Chinese Restaurant with on-sale beer and wine. CONDITIONAL USE PERItIT RESOLUTION N0. PC91-63 FOLLOWING ZS A SUMMARY O.F THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. OPPOSITIONS None ACTION: CEQA Negative Declaration - Approved Conditional Use Permit t:o, 3410 - Granted VOTgs 7-0 ~- ~~ ~~. at V 05/06/91 Page 20 ,~~;-r' i ~~ r ^~~~ ~} ~4 ~~T " TJ.. ]3a. -~ 13b. ~m PAS l~LAp Nb. 9'--173 13C. VAR7.'ANC'E ND. 4126 CIV[~R: JOSEPH M. MARTELLI AND LISA G. HARTELLI, 791 S. HROORHURSTI AVE., ANAHEIM, CA 92804 AC~I!': DOUG SROWNE, P.O. BOX 18021, ANAHEIM, CA 92817 IaCA4'IdV: 901 North West Stl~~i Property is approximately approximately 0.65 acr~~e located on the west aide of Waet Street and approximatel+ 220 feet south of the centerline of La Entrada Circle. Waivers of required lot frontage, minimum lot area, and minimum lot width to establish a 3-lot subdivision. VARIANCE RESOLUTION NO. FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO HE CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. (~ OPPOSITION: 2 `'"~ OPPOSITION CONCERNS: Lot is now on the market; the requirement ie lOR sq. ft. net per lot and hie own lot has that requirement; it Hounds like we car adjust our lot size by changing the zoning; according to staff report they are going to end up with 6,762 sq. ft. net lot area on one of these homes and a 7,550 eq. ft. net lot area; Planning has granted these variances for minimum lot areas in the past. PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Proposes to produce a Parcel Map which will divide an existing lot on 902 N. West street into 3 parceled minimum lot size is lOR eq. ft.; 2 of the iota are 30R eq. ft. and the remaining lot ie approx 8,675 eq. ft.; iota would be served by a private driveway which would cut across the front 2 lots in order to serve the rear lot; not aware that West Street ie considered an arterial but thought it was a collector street, therefore, the house which now faces Weet Street (parcel 1) should have rear of house facing West Street. He submitted plane shows 2 alternatives; in each case he has elected to us. a 3-car garage instead of a 2-car garage; the front drive sweep was designed eo that a car can back out of the front loading garage onto the easement on a 22-1/2 foot minimum inside radius, execute the turn and head out onto West Street; if they use the front loading garage, then that wool also enable one rear loading garage to load from the aide of the private drive; the reason for the 3-car garage is to keep care off the primate drive ae they will not be allowed to park there according to the City J standards on a 20-foot wide private drive. I o~~~ 05/06/91 Page 21 ,--1 148. CEt7A MITIC~IQID ~ Z~KT.AR.~'L'IGYV 14b. CCY~IDIR'?+'?~LA~ U3~ PF~fIT IAD. 2473 (READVF~'ISmJ FY)R AMIIVdNFNl' 'lb Q7(VDITIONS .. `( :~ ~IJ.IYICJ{i ~ I~ CWNII2t WEST ANAHEIM COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, DBA HUMANA HOSPITAL, Attr John Hanshaw, Exec. Dir., 3033 West Orange, Ave., Anaheim, CA 92804 LOCJ~'I7(x1: 3033 W. Grange Ave. Property ie approximately 9.2 acres located at the north.vest corner of Orange Ave. and Beach Blvd. Request for an amendment to the conditions of approval of Conditio vas Permit No. 2473 pertaining to a reciprocal parking requirement the south aide of Orange Ave. and the requirement to provide additional parking in the event a traffic study so warrants. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION N0. t._.; FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THS PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTSS. OPPOSITION: None PETITIONER'S C04U~NTSS There ie an objection from the Traffic Dept. and they may have misinterpreted what they are requeetingi they approached the Commission to make necessary entitlements to build a structure in the Carbon Creek Channel to allow them to consolidate their parking on-site an! to add to that body of parking, 199 spaces. They neglected one alternativE that in the event there was a need for some temporary parking, under the conditions ae they are written, they could not approach the City because they are very specific. They are asking that an alternative b~ allowed fos temporary parking. He added they do not expect to need temporary parking eo this ie a contingency plan only. He is requesting that they provide the third alternative and delegate it t< the Traffic Engineer. SIGN COMMENTS: Henninger - if need alternative parking, where would V it be located are they fully bonded for parking over the Flood Control Channel? Petitioner - Not bonded because it ie not a public improvement= they will just build itf bid packages are out now. Meese - Hae County said 1009 yes for plane to cover the channel? Petitioner - yes, otherwise it would not be out to bid. i 05/06/91 Page 23 i, ~ Petitioner - Yee. n STAFF COt9~IENTS: Alfred Yalda, Traffic Engineering, stated the applicant does not even know where he ie going to provide for this and how he is going to do itt he ie talking about 7-days a week, 24 hrs. a day with an emergency operation] Traffic cannot see how they can supply parking 2 mil away and have them ehuttledt Traffic recommends that they keep the site until he is finished with the parking and then move the parking from one side of the street to the other aide of the street. Traffic dose not see this as a viable request and, therefore, recommends denial. If applicant has an alternative plan, then have applicant submit it to th and let them present it to the Commission, however, the applicant wants t PC to approve it, then if it becomes necessary, qo and provide the information to them. Do not have the mechanism to enforce a shuttle. CTIO s Continued to 5/20/91 (Applicant to meet with Traffic to come up with a solution). 1.J ;p ~A 1 05/06/91 Page 24 s; y` ._ 15. jLFR')RT AND RFX27bA41~TDAT20NS A. RIPIDITICh1AL USE PF~fIT Nil 3244 - REX'[~'!' FUR ,RE'!'R2ALR'IVC~E ~ ' w ".~.":S'y'"7 OF TII~ '!h QX'1PLY W.Pl'H CL7NDIR'I~VS OF APPIrX~AL: T E.Y.~~iPE Endowment Realty Investors, INC., requests for extension of 3 -~p~! Z time to comply with conditions of approval. Property ie located at 5550 Eset Santa Ana Canyon Rd. ~~ B. R~nSS'~'T'CATZON Ni3 89-90-46 ADID C17NDimraNAL USE PEI~lIT NCI. 3262 Apj1tC~VBCd nFn~rrsnnrn>F EXTFIJSIOM OF TIME '!n CL'N1Pl~ k^iE CbNDITIONS QF' APPA'JVAT :- ~o EXP/2 E Mark Yorita, requests for extension of time to comply with conditions of approval. Property ie located on the northwest corner of y -~ 3- z Monte Vista Road and Weir Canyon Road VV~I C, m~mrrrntazr -JcF p~ Nb 3146 ~'~'~ pF. r~ ~I,y p1,~ QXVDITIONS OF APPId7VAL Jerry Erickson, T-~ ~XP/~E (Trinity Lutheran requests a retroactive extension of time to comply with conditions of approval. Property is located at the northeast ~ ~~ -~ Z corner of Nohl Ranch Road and Nohl Canyon Road. x/-N,/) I D, PR~FLISED A~/RESIDE~1!'IAL MIXED USE Continued from the Approved ~,, meetings of March 25, April 8, and May 6, 1991 Planning Commission. ~,_ / $Q,JOUA~NT s There being no further business, the Planning Commission adjourned at 6s45 p.m. to the Planning Commission Work Session to be held on Monday, May 13, 1991, in the Planning Department conference room no. 156. AY h 1 I ~ ~; 05/06/91 Page 25 _. ,.,. ,.