Loading...
Minutes-PC 1991/06/03i '! 1 r, l..J 1L11V1Y L1lCiY/A RA?ILAR MEEPING OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING Q719NISSION MANDAY, JUNE 3, 1991 AT 10:00 A.M. Fl~~-'~~ARf' PLAN REV.IBt~ AJ9LIC FIEARIIVG (FUELIC TESTIMONY) 10:00 a.m. 1:30 p.m. GYk9~lISSIONECrS PRESIIV'T: BOUAS, BOYASlT1N, FET~DHIYIS, HELLYER, HENNIIVGER, MESSE, PERAZA OJMMISSIONFdZS ABSENT': NONE PI~IDfJRE 2b EXPEDITE PLANN.IIVG Q7APfISSION PJBLIC HEARINGS 1. The proponents in applications which are not contented will have five minutes to present their evidence. Additional time will be granted upon request if, in the opinion of the Commission, such additional time will produce evidence important to the Commission's consideration. 2. In contested applications, the proponents and opponent will each be given ten minutes to present hie case unless additional time is requested and the complexity of the matter warrants. The Commission's considerations are not determined by the length of time a participant speaks, but rather by whati is said. 3. Staff Reports are part of the evidence deemed received by the Commission in each hearing. Copies are available to the public prior to the meeting. 4. The Commission will withhold questions until the public hearing is closed. 5. The Commission reserves the right to deviate from the foregoing if, in its opinion, the ends of fairness to all concerned will be nerved. 6. All documents are presented to the Planning Commission for review in connection with any hearing, including photographs or other acceptable visual representations of non-documentary evidence, shall be retained by the Commission for the public record and shall be available for public inspections. 7. At the end of the scheduled hearings, members of the public will be allowed to speak on items of interest which are within the jurisdiction of the Planning Commission, and or agenda items. Each speaker will be allotted a maximum of five (5) minutes to speak. PC910603 `~ 06/03/91 Page 1 ~ ,~'' 1 i ~~l~W :,~~;°. ~. la. CQ~A NEGA'PIVE DECLARATION Continued to lb. GDNDITIONAL USE PERMI'T' N0. 3381 June 17,1991 Cf1~NER: STEWART GREEN AND ASSOCIATES, Attn: Rosalie McCormick, 2180 E. Lincoln Ave., Anaheim, CA 92806 IACATION: 2134 E. l.incroln Ave. Property ie approximately 27.1 acres located at the southeast corner of Lincoln Ave, and State College Blvd. To permit the division of an existing retail unit. Continued from the February 11, March 11, and May 6, 1991 Planning Commission meetings. CONDITIONAL USS PERMIT RESOLUTION N0. FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. OPPOSITION: None PETITIONER'S CONCERNS: .On May 23rd their client met with the Traffic Dept. regarding the proposed plane for the installation of a median on State College Blvd. Mr. Daw, Public Works-Engineering, has raised some questions regarding the grading and consequently plans are currently being redrafted to accommodate Mr. Dew's concerns. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS: Commissioner Mesas asked that staff and the applicant work as hard as they could to get this resolved because they will come to a vote at the next meeting. STAFF COMMENTS: Mr. Hastings, Zoning Division Manager, stated that there ie a 6 month time period where the Commission will have to take an action or else it will bm deemed approved. ACTION: Continued to 7/1/91 ~rL; ~.~.,; '~ 1 ~/ ~s ~~. ;~. s 2a. CAA MPlIGATED NEGATIVE DE~GARATION 2b. WAIVER OF Gt7DE REt7f1IRII~NP ~ 2c. (ANDITIONAL USE PEliN1IT NO. 3373 CWNER: MITTON JOHNSON et al, 1214 West Katella Ave., Anaheim, CA 92802 AGIIV•l: K. OSTOWARi, 6263 E. Twin Peak Circle, An~.heim, CA 92807 I~0CA4'I0N: 521 South Manchester Ave. Property is approximately 2.1 acres located on the southwest corner of Manchester Ave. and Santa Ana St. To permit an auto dismantling and auto storage yard and a temporary office trailer in conjunction with an existing auto repair facility with waivers of minimum structural setback and required improvement of parking area. Continued from the May 6, 1991 Planning Commission meeting. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION N0. PC91-72 ~ .~~~~. Denied Denied Denied FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. OPPOSITION: 1 person PETITIONER'S CONCERNS: Khoda Ostowari, representative for the owner. He stated Code Enforcement asked them to resolve some of their concerns regarding signs and permits for those signs; also there was some confusion regarding the old permits which had been permitted by the City of Anaheim. They obtained the documents they could get and Code Enforcement was going to contact DMV and get more information in order for the Planning Commission to make a decision. Robert Kent, owner of master lease. He stated he owns the business located in the front area, i.e., W&W. He stated this was the business in question and when they left the last meeting he was given a list of things that they should have complied with. There were a couple of signs that they did not have permits on and have since been taken care c`; had some pictures and has copies of recent licensee issued by the State on both businesses ae well ae the City; could probably go back into hie archives and find licensee that were issued back in the early 60's for the same type of business. 06/03/91 Page 3 t owns master lease which includes W&W, JD Auto Repair and also Anaheim Motors. Bojack is his corporation and it owns W&W Auto Porte. The partners .involved with-Anaheim Motors are in conflict. Originally there was one dismantling yard in the early 60's; was going to open another yard in the back portion of the property and went through the ~ process of doing that and that was issued to him. It was W&W Auto salvage in the rear and W&W Auto Parts in the Front. Subsequently, he sold WflW Auto Salvage, (the back portion) to Mr. Ali and his partners. There were 2 dismantlers an that same piece of property and that is how it ie today. Mr. Kent indicated that Mr. Ali has presented the City Attorney with a restraining order against hie partner who ie present today. He indicated he did not want to get into their feud and that they are here for a decision regarding the CUP. Mohammad Talai, one of the partners of the back portion of the property stated the City gave to him, in his name alone, a diamantlinq salvage license. After a while the City found out that this was given to him by mistake and he did not know why. He came to the City and cancelled the license and then went to the DMV and cancelled the license because he would like to have an impound yard or a towing company, etc.; hie partners tried to get the license by themselves; they came to the City and the City told them diamantlinq was not a permitted use; hie partner changed the word "no" tc "and" and he got hie license from the City. Ali Elyaszadeh. Within the past 2 meetings the other gentlemen wants to prevent him from getting his license and going on with his life; ~~ has been fighting with this person for the past 2 years; his claims ~..~ are all false; there were 4 gartnero together; hoe 2 letters showing where he sold his share to his eon; a year ago he sold his share to his nephew for a substantial amount of money. Chairwoman eoydatun made it clear that they were only concerned with the CUP and not partnerships or monetary value. Commissioner Hellyer asked Mr. Elyaszadeh why he felt they should be able to have a diamantlinq yard on this site? Mr. Elyaszadeh stated he has been in buslnees for 4 years and this property. Yaa been in the auto dismantling business for the past 25 yaare; they have been doing a lot of improvements and it is in better condition than 988 of all other diamantlinq yards in the state. Have nOt been able to build an office because the CUP was not in place; now he is operating out of a trailer and the City dose not like it. i 06/03/91 Page 4 io *~; Y'Y.; Has not been able to improve the condition of the fence because they dig] not have the conditional use permit, and in the past year he has been fighting with the City and the DMV; it has changed from the th h~ 4.:.:., ~ beginning and he ie responsible for all of e c ..ngea. Peggy Flanagan, Code Enforcement. She stated there is no permit for dismantling or auto wrecking; she referenced the resolution that was passed by the Commission and adopted by the City Council in 1973; under condition 3, it says that the petitioner stipulated that there would be no dismantling of vehicles, nor would the premises be operated as a wrecking yard and that it would be operated as an impound yard in which some of the vehicles were wrecked and impounded awaiting disposition by the insurance companies before removal. She also contacted the DMV and found out there is a dismantling license for W&W Auto Wrecking although their business license is for WW Auto Parts; there has been no CUP issued in regard to the dismantling business at 500 S. Walnut; ae far as Anaheim Motors at 521 S. Manchester, there is no state dismantling license. Jerry Johnson, Senior Special Investigator for the DMV was present. Commissioner Hellyer asked if he had information regarding the history of this applicant and Mr. Johnson stated in December of 1990, a team of investigators including himself did go to that location regarding a complaint of a possible unlicensed dismantling activity; they did conduct a formal inspection of the yard and determined there was unlicensed dismantling going on at which time the owner was cited; last week there was a trial in which he was convicted of ;~ violation of Section 11500 of the Vehicle Code. Commissioner Hellyer asked for clarification as to which operator they cited and Mr. Johnson stated Mr. Ali. Commissioner Meese asked when they cite someone do they give them the opportunity of then going ahead and getting that license and Mr. Johnson explained they can always apply for a license and Sacramento will then make a final determination if they are entitled to have one. Marietta Ornelas, Licensing Inspector for the CMV in Fullerton. Commissioner Hellyer asked what is the process for an applicant that wants a license from the DMV, i.e., do they require any sort of blesei.ng from the City. 06/03/91 Page 5 ~,Y • ~~~M1~' ~~~t4ki ;,:V: K~~ L ~:T:..~ANOi Me. Ornelae explained they have a form that they take to the City and Zoning is suppose to sign it saying it does have the proper zoning; she submitted a copy of the form to the Commission. She further explained there was a dismantling license issued to Mohammad Talai, ~ l however, he surrendered that license in July of 1990. When he applied for the license he submitted that farm signed by the City of Anaheim. She clarified that he surrendered the license voluntarily because it was his understanding that the area was no longer zoned for dismantling. • Commissioner Hellyer asked if it was possible that someone could have been confused as to what they needed in order to have a dismantling operation and Me. Ornelae sated they would not give any kind of temporary license without the application being complete. Commissioner Bouae - How many CUPa needed on this property? Mr. Hastings stated they could all be under one CUP. Commissioner Meese asked about the sales of used care and Mr. Hastings explained that was not advertised as part of Chia application, however, it could be inclu~sd pending a readvertiaement. Commissioner Bouas asked for clarification as to how many things would be under this CUP? Mr. Hastings stated it would have to include any dismantling and auto sales on the property. He deferred to Code Enforcement for their comments. ~ ~ Ma. Flanagan stated it would include Anaheim Collision Craft at i -' 520 S. Walnut which ie an auto body shop and that would require a CUP also. Commissioner Bouas asked if that included the spray booth and Ma. Flanagan indicated that was correct. Ms. Flanagan listed the following current business licenses. 1. Anaheim Motors, 521 S. Manchester although business license was taken out under 520 S. Walnut. 2. Anaheim Motors showing a location of 521 S. Manchester Avenue. 3. Anaheim Collision Craft, 520 S. Walnut for auto body repair and painting. 4. WW Auta Parts, 500 to 520 S. Walnut. I 5. J&D Auto and Body Repair, 511 S. Manchester Avenue. ~~ 1 During the course of her investigation she had a telephone message ~ for a business called Mercedes and BMW Service Center at 502 S. Walnut, however, she is unable to find a b!~siness license for that. 06/03/91 1 Page 6 I i s ~~~ ~`~: u ~ • • ",~ Commissioner Hellyer asked if she would identify those urea on the property that do not have permits. Ma. Flanagan stated they do not have a CUP on file for Auto Body Repair and Painting which is required in that zone; no CUP on file for used auto car salsa which 3.s occurring at 500 S. Walnut; no CUP on file for the dismantling business at 500 S. Walnut. ' Commissioner Bouas asked for clarification if there were any permits ~, at all for dismantling and Me. Flanagan stated no CUP. Commissioner Feldhaus stated they do have a business license which expired on 1/31/J1. Me. Flanagan stated there is no CUP on file for either dismantling business which was strictly prohibited under the resolution she mentioned earlier. Mr. Kent explained ae an auto dismantler they can sell vehicles wholesale to other dismantlers, eo there ie no retail auto salsa going on the premises. Commissioner Hellyer asked for clarification as to why Ms. Flanagan thought they were doing used car sales there and Me. Flanagan explained they have a .large sign up that sa}•s USED CARS FOR SALE. Mr. Johnson stated if the}• are advertising USED CAR5 FOR SALE that would indicate salsa to the general public; if a dismantler is selling back anti forth to each other, he has never seen them ~~'•1 advertise on the street. •~./ Bruce Freeman, Code Enforcement, stated a number of the vehicles have FOR SALE signs in the windows of the vehicles which is another indicator that the vehicles are being Bold to the general public. Mr. Kent explained the sign, FOR SALE, faces inside the yard and it is a section only for dismantlers that is roped off for visitors that come in and visit the Mercedes and BMW Wrecking Yard; they do not sell to the public. Commissioner Hellyer asked for clarification if someone came in off j of the street, or they wanted to buy pares, and they noticed the j signs in the cars and they wanted to buy a car, would you sell it to ~ them? Mr. Kent stated he was sure it has been done, however, they do not practice that. ACTION: CEQA Mitigated Negative Declaration - Denied Waiver of Code Requirement - Denied Conditional Use Permit - Denied VOTE• 7-0 ~' 06/03/91 Page 7 .~,~~ ~, !'1 ~x ~ t ~`...~. `../ 3a. IIVPI13V1'AL IMPAL'1' REE23RT N0. 308 June 17, 1991 3b. GII4EfiAL PLAN Ah1ISVDMFSl1' NO. 320 3C. RE~L~ISSIFI'CA770N N0. 90-91 26 i 3d. WAIVII2 OF CLYDE RIIXIIRE~P , 3e. Q7NDITIONAL USE PERMI'P N~. 3415 CI~VNII2: IDM Corporation, 5150 E. Pacific Coast Hwy., Long i Beach, CA 90804 , LaCATION: Property is approxi»tely 7.5 acres located at the northeast garner of Brookhulst Street and GYameitiy Avenue. To amend the Land Use Element of the General Plan to redesignate subject property from the existing General Industrial designation to the Medium Density Residential designation. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 90-91-26: To reclassify subject property from the ML (Limited Industrial) zone to RM-1200 (Residential, Multiple-Family) or a less intense zone. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3415: To permit a 338 unit, 3 and 4 story deck-type "affordable" housing apartment complex with waivers of minimum building site area and permitted identification eignage. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT RESOLUTION N0. I RECLASSIFICATION RESOLUTION NO. CONDITIONAL USB PERMIT RESOLUTION NO. st .:~., .., ...., .. .. ,_ .... ... ...,.:.,. .. _.,..~._ -. r, , , 06/03/91 Page 8 ~: ~~; ~: ~-~, . , ~~,,~. _ ~ ~Y^: r•c a ~~ .. .? tiuA~l ~t:, ~: VC 'V2`I; ~i ~f' ~ ~ uNr}Vlw') 5~~. FI 4a. CEC~A HIXsA'['IVE D~.ARA'I'ION Continued to 4b. WAIVER OF Ct~DE REK70IRIIHFIV'P June 17, 1991 4c. Gt~NDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3414 CfVNER: University Cinema, A California Limited Partnership, Attn: Hruce Sanborn, 13 Corporate Plaza, Newport Beach, CA 92660 ~ LOCATION: 5635 East Ia Palma Avenue. Property .ls aY»tely 5.54 acres located on the north side of La Palma Avenue and appxnxitnately 300 feet west of the anterlane of .imperial Highway. To permit the expansion of amulti-screen indoor theatre complex and to construct a 29-foot high parking structure (160 spaces) with waiver of minimum number of parking spaces, prohibited roof mounted equipment and minimum landscaped setback adjacent to railroad right-of-way. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION N0. FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. PETITIONERS COMMENTS: City did not mail out notice to his neighbor C and therefore, his neighbor was requesting a continuance of this item. ACTION: Continued to 6/17/91 ~.r,., ~~ I 06/03/91 Page 9 ;• i ;~. <;. -„ ~ ,.~ 5a. CQ~A NFX,A'L'IVE DECLARATION Sb. VARIANCE NO. 4130 ,~ 5C. TF~1'!'ATIVE TIiAGR' MAP N0. 14512 CY7NER: CONESTOGA PARTNERS, 1240 S. Walnut Street, Anaheim, CA. AGENT: Phil Schwartze, 27132-B Paseo Eepada, Ste. 1222, San Juan Capistrano, CA 926?5 IACATION: ]240 South Walnut Street. Property is approximately 6.4 acres located on the south aide of Ball Road and the east side of Walnut Street. Waivers of lot required frontage and required structural setback to pernit a 5-lot condominium subdivision. VARIANCE RESOLUTION NO. PC91-73 FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. OPPOSITION: one concerned individual spoke who was previously in opposition; there had been an ongoing serious problem with the residents in the area having to do with tour buses, charter buses and r airport buses that service the Conestoga; the concerns have now been l mitigated. PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Are filing a parcel map on the property to divide the buildings up for later. purposes on the condominium; they have not changed the site plan whatsoever from the approvals that the Commission gave them some time ago. STAFF COMMENTS: Melanie Adams, Public Works-Engineering, stated there is concern regarding fire trucks; during the IDC meeting the Fire Department raised a concern regarding the distance of buildings F and G from the east property line; they need a minimum of 26 feet and 24 feet ie currently provided; normally a 2-foot difference would not be such an important issue, however, this ie a very tight site and any movement: of this building may encroach into the parking isle and the drive isle for the buses; a critical part of this project ie to keep the buses moving through. Mr. Schwartze stated they have been working with the Fire Department; the Fire Department ie interested in additional space and they have promised to work faithfully with them in order to accomplish that. ACTION: CEQA Negative Declaration - Approved Variance No. 4130 - Granted Tentative Tract Map Na. 14512 - Approved Approved Granted Approved I VOTE• 7-0 I ~ 06/03/91 Page 10 ____ .:, a a a~. -'s .,` tj;~ ,. Sa. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION Withdrawn 6b. G17NDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3416 /~ V ; CWNER: Roger Nigogosyan, 8235 Zitola Terrace, Playa Del Rey, CA 90293 A~IP: Kenneth Dinsmore, 16892 Green Street, ~1, Huntington Hoach, CA 92649 IACATION: 1895 West Ratella Ave. Property ie approximately ~ 0.45 acre located at the northeast corner of Katella Avenue and Nutwood Street. To permit on premise Bale and consumption of beer in a pool hall. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION N0. FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION A:TION. NOT TO HE ! CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. OPPOSITION• 2 OPPOSITION CONCERNS: ~cncerned with the loitering and drinking problem in the back of this business, the increase of traffic, and graffiti all over the walla. The police have had problems in the .-, t area at night with shootings, gangs and cruising drunks, also f residents have experienced trash thrown in their backyards. They are concerned for the children coming home from school and passing by the other surrounding businesses that currently sell liquor. Opposition submitted a petition signed by residents in the area against the project. Opposition feels they don't need another pool hall to worsen the areas current problems. PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: This application is a service to people that want to go into a nice clean establishment and play billiards. He doesn't see that there is a traffic problem. Petitioner believes that having the building vacant creates more of a loitering problem for residents and having it occupied is more of an assurance of a reduction of loitering, etc. If the opposition's sole objection is the beer license then he would be willing to withdraw this request since beer ie not the business he is in, rather it is to provide the ` service of playing billiard. '~. COMMISSION COMMENTS: Hoydstun clarified with petitioner that he said he would withdraw the on-sale beer license. Melee indicated that if applicant would verbally state that he would like the application ~ withdrawn, then submit it in writing to the Department and the Commission could approve the withdrawal today. l- `,,,,' 06/03/91 Page 11 :.Yr ,, Y' ~,. r~; ~` , ,.+ .~ ~~. k ti .r . "`. .. ~. i, ' i s D~, 4 i, i.~y; `'~` L ~%f`Yi~ ~.~ ,'~ ~. _ ~ ` f~ry~`. ,~~, .. ^~ '` ' ~~ ~. I ;.~~ ;I "1 ~.J STAFF COMMENTS: Greg Hastings commented that the subject before them today is only for the on-sale beer license. The pool hall is a permitted use in this zone, however, the pool table permit will be considered before the City Council on June 11, 19917 the opposition present may wish to attend the City Council meeting. He stated if ~ the applicant withdrawn the request for on-sale of beer, then that would be withdrawing the entire application. He suggested that the petitioner submit the withdrawal in writing. ACTION: Petition ho permit on-premise sale and consumption of beer in a pool hall was withdrawn by the applicant. ._ ~ Vii:.. 06/03/91 Page 12 _ .........~. :~~5 .3?r ~t* _~`VfJ('.9~NSP /C'~4~S~L.. 1 ~{.' ' .. .. ri . F,+.~'f A 7a. CE~A NEX;A4'IVE DECLARATION Approved WAIVER OF CUDE RECXIIRE~NP 7b Granted . 7c. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3417 Granted for 1 year CWNhR: A. G. Cassia, 413 Sharon Road, Arcadia, CA 91007 AGETr!': Sim Hoffman, M.D., 585 S. Knott Street, Anaheim, CA 92804 LOCATION: 545-595 S. RnOtt Street. Property is approximately 0.68 acre located at the northwest corner of Knott Street and Orange Avenue. To permit a temporary medical office trailer at an existing medical complex (commercial center) with waiver of minimum number of parking spaces. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION N0. PC91-74 FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. OPPOSITION: None PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: There was a problem with generator noise from the previous vendor but it appears that since the new vendor was contracted the noise problem has been corrected. The trailers ~' currently meet the AQMD standards. The employees are carpooling on , the day the trailers are there and have made arrangements to park outside by the church, therefore, leaving those spaces available for the rest of the people that come in during the day. The complaint about the noise hoe been addressed by making it clear to their employees that this site will not be approached unless it is before 9:00 p.m. the evening prior or until 7:01 a.m. the following morning, and anyone who dose not obey will be terminated. COMMISSION COMMENTS: Hellyer suggested that the driver have an assistant to help in the backup. Bouae suggested to set a time limit so that if there are persistent complaints then they would be in jeopardy of loosing their CUP. 06/03/91 Page 13 .;, rF;.. ~, 'iWrr ,~':~.- ~~ ~'~:§i ! M j y ~;~ ~ ~~.` won, . lf~ t ~ ~; ' ^. ,~~ ~~~+, N~ ~` ~1 7Ji yf_ r ~Fl•: ~~' , u~ 1 ~..~ ~.J STAFF COMMENTS: Bruce Freeman, Code Enforcement Supervisor, stated they received a complaint in writing oa April 9, 1991. They also received a letter from one of the tenants who lives in the adjacent apartment complex complaining about the noise and that they thought this item had been resolved in January. On May 30th Code Enforcement staff conducted a survey of 12 tenants in the building directly north of this location. Six of the tenants were at home and they all j complained of the noise the trucks made; the air brakes, the constant running of the electrical air conditioning unit and the unhooking and hooking of the vehicle itself to the trailer. I ACTION: Negative Declaration - Approved Waiver of Code Requirement - Granted Granted Conditional Use Permit - Granted The following conditions were added: 1) That the trailer shall be delivered to the Bite no earlier than 7:00 a.m. on the day of operation and shall be removed no later than 9:00 p.m. on the day of operation. 2) That an agreement to carpool or otherwise reduce the number of parking spaces used by employees shall be made by ~ , the employees and/or adequate off-site parking shall be obtained for the one (1) day per week subject trailer is on the site. VOTE: 6-0 (Commissioner Peraza absent) ,. ~ _ -_ i ~ 06/03/91 Page 14 ~'-> t...: ~, ~' 8a CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION Approved 8b. RECLASSIFICATION N0. 90-91-27 Granted Bc. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3418 Granted 8d. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 91-118 Approved i OWNER: BUGANKO, A California General Partnership, 3855 East I La Palma Avenue, Ste. 101, Anaheim, CA 92807 Ar l: Charisma Group, A California Corporation, 3855 E. La Palma Avenue, St~9. 101, Anaheim, CA 92807 I~QCA4'ION: Property is approximately 0.142 acres located on the I west side of Bubach Street and approximately 730 feet north of the interline of OrarxJetharpe Avenue. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 90-91-27: To reclassify 2,250 square foot portion of subject property from RS-A-43,000(0) (Residential, Agricultural (oil, Production Overlay)) zone to the RS-5,000(0) (Residential, Single-Family (011 Production Overlay)) or a lase intense zone to correspond with the RS-5000(0) zoning for the remainder of the subject parcel. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3418: To permit a dwelling in a designated Floodplain Overlay Zone. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 91-118: To establish a 1-lot subdivision. RECLASSIFICATION RE80LUTION NO. PC91-75 _,_ CONDITIONAL USS PERMIT £ESOLUTION NO. PC91-76 FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. OPPOSITION: None PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: COMMISSION COMMENTS: STAFF COMMENTS: Per Melanie Adams, Public Works-Engineering. Make following changes to conditions: 1. Under CUP, page 6, condition no. 3, first line: add the word "map" after parcel. 2. Under Tentative Tract, page 7, condition no. 2: Requests this be moved from the tentative parcel map to the conditional use permit and be tied to issuance of a building permit rather than approval of the final parcel map. 06/03/91 ~ Page 15 _. _. ?~, ~~. sue: ~~ ~it,ps,'~.' try ~~ p~,6-. .t ,. r ~~ •t,' :,a 1~ `~ ,; ~ w 1 y~~ - Nr~} fi ~ !7 ~l tFi~" ~~ ~.(,~ • . ~lnr }'~~Y, {,~ ~. -6q ' ~.` y,y: ? rl ~, O ACTION: CEQA Negative Declaration -Approved ? Reclassification No. 90-91-27 -Granted `.,~~; Conditional Use Permit No. 3418 -Granted ~ - .c (With change as mentioned above) ~ I i Tentative Parcel Man No. 91-118 -Approved ' (With change as mentioned above) ~ VOTE: 6-0 (Commissioner Peraza absent) !'! , 4,` ;~r:,' ;':1~:., ~a ~j ~, ~~' ~ ~ - ~~~ . vR~ 06/03/91 Page 16 "'~' 1..~ . ' ... ~ti ~; . ~ ~ + t~ ~ *~~ i 1I N 1. 5c. };y'~ ~ kf. 9d ~~_ ti~tx~,n WY:. ~,1~d% ~'i L~, °iu» !~,ry",~~'ktk!"~i`l''~+.' .ate: ~~. v~t. ~... µt(~y •~k rM1 (, '. t~"1 V 9a. CEnA NEGATIVE DEL^GARATION continued to 9b. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 3419 July 1, 1991 i ` OWNER: JACK HEINRICH, 12836 E. Alondra Blvd., Cerritos, CA 90701 .:ii ~ a, AGETIP: SAM E. ARBUTHNOT, 6631 N. Cherry Ave., Long Beach, CA 90805 7.00ATI0N: 535 S. Anaheim Blvd. Property is approximately 0.66 acre located on the west Bide of Anaheim Boulevard and approximately 330 feet north of the centerline of Water Street. To permit a car wash. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION N0. ~~,:, .£ l K ^'~ . ~.,+ ;/. ~, ~.' LOCATION: 125 East Ellsworth Street. Property is approximately 0.13 acre located at the northwest corner of Ellsworth Avenue and Claudina Street. Waivers of minimum structural setback, minimum yard required, minimum recreational leisure area, permitted encroachments, and ' required vehicle access to construct a second dwelling unit. VARIANCE RESOLUTION N0. PC91-77 10a. ~A NEGATIVE DECLARATION Approved lOb. VAR?ANCE NO. 4131 Danied CtVNER: R.H. FIELD, P.O. Box 8, Anaheim, CA 92815 AGENT: S.G. Toth, 200 S. Norman Avenue, Fullorton, CA 92631 ~ FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. OPPOSITION: None PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Commented that he wanted to make this dwelling secure with a concreti.laln-'= """ '`''"' "" f--"~-that ,there , _ are 2 large power poles that are right in the parkway. COMMISSION COMMENTS: Hellyer indicated that he had a problem with all the waivers. Boydetun indicated the parking apace off of Ellewo:_th is making an encroachment. Hesse indicated that he is concerned the petitioner ie building high density in a very small lot. STAFF COMMENTS: Greg Hastings indicated the spaces on the aide of Claudina would be available for parking. Alfred Yalda stated the petitioner needs a 4 foot clearance. ACTION: CEQr, Negative Declaration - Approved Variance No. 4131 - Denied VOTE: 5-1 (Commissioner Peraza absent) (Commissioner Boydstun voted No) ~1!•~. ' i 06/03/91 Page 18 _( '' y..P . ~,i~ a Y ~ ~. a Yw.nJ.i ~~~,~~. n~yd ~ ;: ~r , l '~ r ~, ri~~, ~ t C._ c, *~+ .~, ~M1 ,~ '~~ sir. ~~ ~. ~.~~'Eal ~jq y~/~~. ! WS~~ pl. .. ~ 6 ;i1 ~~ ti ~-;'1' 11a. CE~A CATA;~RICAT+,~ 11 Continued to llb. VAnrtu~~ NU. 4134 July 1, 1991 ~ti~ {; e C1{'NERJ CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT, 1065 Pacificenter Drive, X200, ~; ~~.' Anaheim, CA 92806 IL)CATION: °.aflt8 Fe Pacific~nter Property ie approximately 26 acres located at the southwest cornor of La Palma and i Tustin Avenue. ~ Waiver of maximum number of freestanding signs and minimum I - dietance between freestanding signs to construct a 91- equate foot monument sign. VARIANC$ R$SOLUTION NO. r~ ~S~Gk~i l../ 06/03/91 Page 19 l Y 12a. CEYJA NEGATIVE DFY~nunmrpN (PREVIOUSLY APPA7VID) Approved 12b. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3318 (REAUVEEa'ISED) Granted CtVNER: Phan Nhubui, 14141 Riverton, Westminster, CA 92683 11GIIV'I': Tue Tong, ].4141 Riverton, Westminster, CA 92683 ILLATION: 3203 West Ba11 F~Jc'id. Property is approximately 0.21 acre located at the northwest corner of Ball Road and Western Avenue. Amendment to conditions of approval pertaining to a limitations of uses. To permit a real estate office in CONJUNCTION with a beauty salon. CONDITIONAL USS PERMIT RESOLUTION N0. PC91-78 FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. OPPOSITION: None PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: On July 30, 1990 a conditional uee permit was granted by the Commission; Condition No. 9 of Resolution No. PC90-196 was adopted in conjunction with CUP 3318, limiting the uee to a beauty salon only. Now he is requesting that the use be amended to permit the bueineae office (such as for real estate, tax preparation, insurance) because of the fluctuating demand for these type of businesses. The traffic generated by this office will not cause a problem to the area. COMMISSION COMMENTS: Hellyer suggested using item no. 6-C, page 2 which includes business offices, accounting, bookkeeping, i~:eurance, law or legal services, real estate or public utilities consultants and other similar offices. Meese suggested to include beauty salon and item no. 6-C. STAFF COMMENTS: Greg Hastings suggested that Commission might want to define the use in the resolution for clarity. ACTION: CEQA Negative Declaration - Approved Conditional Use Permit No. 3318 (Readvertieeu) - Approved Limiting it to bueineae offices as defined on page 2 of the staff report, item no. 6, paragraph C. VOTE: 6-0 (Commissioner Peraza absent) 06/03/91 Page 20 - -. :~ a "` ~~„ iw 13a. CQ?A NEGATIVE DEl'~13RATION (PREVIWSLY APPRdVID) 13b. VARIANCE NO. 3631 (REAtiVF.F2~'ISID) CLVNER: KENSKI PROPERTIES, 3001 Redhill Ave., Bldg. 5, Ste. 201, Costa Mesa, CA 92626 IiOCATION: 2405 2415 West I.incnl.n Ave. Property is approximately 1.1 acres located north and west of the northwest corner of Lincoln Avenue and Gilbert Street. An amendment to the conditions of approval pertaining to fast-food facilities with waiver of minimum number of parking spaces to establish an additional 1,056 square feet of fast food uses. VARIANCE RESOLUTION NO. PC91-79 FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. OPPOSITION: 1 in opposition 1 in favor OPPOSITION CONCERNS: Russell Mangold who has a business at 2450 W. Lincoln, Units C&D, recommended the following options: 1) Cutback on the beauty shop and make them comply with what Commission originally approved, i.e., either do away with the beauty shop altogether or at least cut it down in half. That would not solve the current parking problem but would help somewhat. 2) If there is an agreement to keep the restaurant closed in the daytime and loose the 4 hours worth of business then make sure there is a 25~ reduction in the rent since he ie not able to use the parking lot between 10:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m. 3) The owners of this lot in question also own the lot next door to the laundromat. He does not know what the plan is for that lot but there is enough space there to convert it as a parking lot for an approximate additional 25 to 30 more parking spaces. It measures 124 ft. deep and approximately 79 ft. wide. 4) Make them provide the 48 spaces for restaurant apace as it was designed. Art Cano owns the Mexican restaurant in question. It ie a fast food take-out. He has not had any problems with the parking. Hie neighbor, Dee, who owns the Thai food restaurant has never complained. He would be the moat affected because ha was the last tenant to come into the business property and he would have to close his doors if the tables were no longer allowed. V Approved Denied ~.:~° ~`~~'. ~, ~~~,. ~~, PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: They are not asking for additional square footage which is 944 square feet over what was approved. The original leases ie complaining that there ie not enough parking at lunch time although petitioner has made some visits during the lunch hours and did not find parking to be a problem. There are future t J' plans for the side lot and there ie a residential home now that ie leased out. STAFF COMMENTS: Greg Hastings stated a resident contacted the office to voice their opposition an this item. Alfred Yalda, Traffic Engineering, clarified in their parking studies they counted every apace as being leased which takes into consideration any vacant unite and that studies are done at varied times of the day. ACTION: CEQA Negative Declaration (previously approved) - Approved Conditional Use Permit No. 3631 (readvertieed) - Denied VOTE: 4-2 (Commissioners Bouas and Henninger voted NO) V 1 06/03/91 Page 22 *°~x'j^' T~3 ''~R~%.. ~~~ ~: ~~~ ~~~x~,~. F~' .rr ~~'~ +'•;~ ~~~" i~(. 1y:. Lw ~' 14a. A 1~'IVE DEL^GARAR70N PREVI0f1SLY APP%J~7ID) I Continued to CED 14b. CL7NDITI0NAL USE PERMIR' NO. 3299 (REAdVECd7SED) ,-~ 14c. TENR'ATIVE TRACP MAP No. 14406 (READVEIa'ISID) i GINNER: Q.M.P. PARTNERSHIP, Attn: Maesoud Monehizadehi, 157: W. Katella Ave., Anaheim,CA 92802 IOCATIQN: 1575 West Katella Avenue. Property is approximately 2.21 acres located on the north aide o: Katella Avenue and approximately 314 feet east of the centerline of Carnelian Street. An amendment to condition of approval pertaining to recordatioi of CC&R's (Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions). CONDITIONAL USS PERMIT RESOLUTION N0. FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES. PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Requested continuance to July 1, 1991, in order to work with the City Attorney and Traffic Engineering. ~..J July 1, 1991 ;~ 06/03/91 Page 23 15. REROR!' AND RA~4ffi~TDATIONS A. OaNDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3165 - EXTIIASION OF TIME: Dwight R. Belden (Hillman Properties West Inc.) .requests far a retroactive extension of time to Damply with conditions of approval. Property is located at 2430 E. Ratella Ave. B. VARIANCE NO. 4052 - EX~23VSION OF TIME: C+earge Hansen, Almaion Corp., requests for a retroactive extension of time to amply with a~ndi.tions of approval. Property is located at 828 ~ ~~Q ~~ /~~~ •~~,Zp~yt-~ C. INTERPRETATION OF "FAST FgOD DEFINITION FC)R O~NDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3055: Khoda oetowari, requests interpretation of "fast food" definition for Conditional Uae Permit No. 3055. Property ie located at 513 W. Chapman Avenue. RESOLUTION N0. _, PC91-BO l`~ `.J D. TFAITATIVE TRACT MAP NOS 13511 13513. 13515, 13516, 13517 13518 13533 13534, 13540. 13541 AND 13987 - EXTEIVSION OF TIME: The Baldwin Company requests for extension of time for/Veetin~ Tentative Tro~t Map Nos. 13511, °}3513, 3515, `13516, /13517, X3518, Q3533, x:3534, X13540, 13541 and~13987. Property located at The Summit of Anaheim Hills Specific Plan (SP88-2) Development Area Noe. 101 and 105. The meeting recessed at 5:20 p.m. to the 6:00 p.m. public hearing. u Approved TO EX P//IE 6- s-9z P~~ Approved TU EXT~/.2E' ~-~-9~~Ftu- Granted //~"" Approved ?~ ~'~i2 E ~-/9-9~. ~~/,~- .J,Y _ ~i:7~~aeY;' a° ti - ~;:ti+~,,:: .. ~a ~' THE F0~',UC1iIt~%i PUBLIC ~PIId, NOT BE HEARD BLUE 6:00 P.M. :r, m ~ ~: 16a. ENVIId3Nl~1PAL .IMPACT REEbRT NO. 302 Continued to 16b. GIIVERAL PLAN AhiQVDMIIVl' NO. 318 June 17, 1991 16C. M~fIN!'AIN PARR SPELIFIC PLAN NO. 90-4 DESIIN ATIPE(d~1ATIVE (INCCIIDIIVG A PUBLIC FACILITIES PLANT 16d. MO[IIV'fAIN PARR SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 90-4 ZONING AND DEVEGOPMENl' STANDARDS Gi'VNF~2: THE IRVINE COMPANY, P.O. SOX 1,550 NEWPORT CNTR. DR., Newport Beach, Newport Beach, CA 92658-8904, ATTN: Jay Pierce, Foothill Community Builder LOCA4'ION: Subiect property which is described as the 3 179 acre Gvpeum Canyon property is unincor- porated land located within the County of Orange in the City of Anaheim's sphere-of-influence, and ~ generally bordered on the north by the Riverside Freeway (SR-911 and the Gvpaum Canyon Road inter- ~ chance on the west by The Summit of Anaheim Hills and Sycamore Canyon developments in the City of Anaheim on the south by unin^orporated property within the County of Orange in the City of Orange's sphere-of-influence and on the east by unincorporated property within the City of Anaheim's sphere-of-influence. Request for an amendment to the Land Uae, Environmental Resource and Management and Circulation Elements of the Anaheim General Plan and adoption of the Mountain Park Specific Plan to serve ae preannexation zoning and subsequently regulate the development of the site. A Fiscal Impact Report hoe also been submitted ae part of the project application. ~~ ~./ it i 06/03/91 Page 25 --`-~-^ -ra` dy.ii w~. w'~ ~4. The General Plan Amendment request includes, but ie not limited to, gxopoeals which would amend the existing Land Use Map to establish revieed boundaries and acreages for Hillsiark and ~ Low-Medium and Medium Density Residential, school, p open apace land use designations, delete the Hillside Estate and Hillside Low Density Residential land use designations, increase residential densities to allow for a maximum of 7,966 dwelling unite, and increase General Commercial acreage from 11 to 179 acres; amend the existing Circulation Map to establish revieed alignments and road classifications for Gypsum Canyon oad Weir Can on Road/Jamboree Road, Oak Canyon Drive and R , Y Santa Ana Canyon Road, add new secondary and collector roadways, and delete Coal Canyon Road within the project area, amend existing bikeway and riding and hiking trail plans to establish revieed alignments and classifications; and, amend the existing Environmental Resource and Management Map to establish revised boundaries for open space, sand and gravel operations and agricultural preserves. The proposed Mountain Park Specific Plan (including Zoning and Development Standards and a Public Facilities Plan) would provide for the development of up to 7,966 residential dwelling unite, 179 acres of commercial uses, interim sand and gravel mineral extraction, three elementary schools, a middle school, a high school, a City maintenance yard and facility, s potential fire station site, a potential electrical sub-station site, three neighborhood parks, two community parka, a community center and open space. ~°''+ Related actions will include the Local Agency Formation -~' Commission's (LAFCO) consideration of an application to annex the project area to the City of Anaheim, requests to the County of Orange for consideration of amending the Master Plan of Arterial Highways and Master Plan of Bikeways components of the County of Orange's General Plan Transportation Element, cancellation of Agricultural Preserve Contracts, request for a Development Agreement between the City of Anaheim and Foothill Community Builders (the project applicant), infrastructure financing programs, subdivision plans, grading permits, and other actions related to the proposed development of the Mountain Park Specific Plan community. GENERAL PLAN Al~NDNENT RESOLUTION NO. ~ SPECIFIC PLAN RESOLUTION N0. i SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING AND ~ {`;~~ DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS RESOLUTION NO. i I ADJOURNEMENT• j Adjourned at 8:35 p.m. to the Planning Commission Work Session on June 10, 1991, at 3:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. I V 06/03/91 Page 26