Minutes-PC 1992/02/24 (2)t~`°°`
ACTION AGENDA
MEETING OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING
MONDAY, FEBRUARY ::4, 1992 AT 10:00 A.M.
REGULAR PRELIMINARY PLAN REVIEW PUBLIC HEARING
(PUBLIC TESTIMONY)
10:00 A.M. 1:30 P.M.
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: BOUAS, BRISTOL, HENNINGER, HELLYER, MESSE,
PERAZA, ZEMEL
I
PROCEDURE TO EXPEDITE PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING^u
1. The proponents in applications which are not contested will have five
minutes to present their evidence. Additional time will be granted upon
request if, in the opinion of the Commission, such additional time will
produce evidence important to the Commission's consideration. ~I
i
2. In contested applications, the proponents and opponent will each be given 4
ten minutes to present hie case unless additional time is requested and the },
complexity of the matter warrants. The Commission's considerations are not
determined by the length of time a participant speaks, but rather by what
he Bays.
3. Staff Reports are part of the evidence deemed received by the Commission in
each hearing. Copies are available to the public prior to the meeting.
4. The Commission will withhold questions until the public hearing is closed.
5. The Commission reserves the right to deviate from the foregoing if, in its
opinion, the ends of fairness to all concerned will be served.
6. All documents are presented to the Planning Commission for review in
connection with any hearing, including photographs or other acceptable
visual representations of non-documentary evidence, shall be retained by !
the Commission for the public record and shall be available for public
inspections.
7. At the end of the scheduiad hearings, members of the public will be allowed ,
to speak on items of interest which are within the jurisdiction of the
Planning Commission, and/or agenda items. Each speaker will be allotted a
maximum of five (5) minutes to speak.
~-~ PC920224
2/24/92
Page 1
1a. CECIA MITIC,ATID NEGATIVE DFxLARATION
lb. VARIANCE NO. 4136 (WI'I'1IDRAWN) ~
lc. Tr1V1'ATIVE TRACT' MAP IVO. 14429
ld. SPECIMIIV TREE RETYKIVAL PERMIT NO. 91-07
.~
(SyNERS: ED STERN, LINDA STERN, MANFRED A GLASTETTER, CHRISTA Approved
GLASTETTER, GARY F. LYONS, DONNA LEE LYONS, RAYMOND Approved
W. PEARSON, PAMELA J. PEARSON, CURTIS B. PEARSON, Approved
'
REITA BETH PEARSON, FAED GLASTETTER AND LORI Approved
GLASTETTER
AC;E1V4': FRED GLASTETTER, 25012 Via Del Rio, El Toro, CA
92630
LOCATION; Pro is approximately_8.4 acres located on the
west side of Henning Wav approximately 350 feet south
of the o=nterline of puintana Drive. ~
Waiver of minimum lot width to establish a 7-lot (plus a common
lot, RS-HS-22,000(SC), single-family eubdi.vision.
To remove fifty-eight (6E) specimen trees.
Continued from the August 26, October 7, October 21, November 4,
1491 and January 27, 1992 Planning Commission meetings.
VARIANCB RESOLUTION N0. (Withdrawnl
FOLLOWING IS A SUMDUIRY GF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO SE i
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
OPPOSITION• 7
•
~
PETITIONER'S COMMENT: They were asked at the previous meeting to ~
~,
meet with th3 neighbors and address certain concerns. Access was a
issue; he met with c+wnera of the two adjoining lots and Henning Way
access was ^ddreseed; they are willing to put in a 20-foot wide
roadway; any~hing more than that would affect trees, shrubs, water
meters, gas meters, etc.
The Fire Department indicated in their memo to the Planning
Department that the existing Henning Way 12-foot roadway is adequate. I
They met with Canyon Acres Residential Center and they have come to i
an agreement on several points; one is that a 3U" block wall top with
wrought iron is to be built and maintained at the back end of the 5
approved tract property pads that directly overlook Canyon scree;
they would add to that, that at the time of the building
construction, they would agree with that condition.
~ i
2/24/92 f
Page 2
They asked that trees designated for the hillside adjacent to their
property would be planted mid-range and at staggered distances; they
presented a plan and a request was made to vary the type of trees;
,we, they did that and sent back a new plan and presumed that was
i satisfactory.
A new chain link fence will be installed to replace existing fence on
the property :ins between their sites.
That the development's association will assume the full financial
responsibility for the maintenance of the storm drain on Canyon Acres
property; it catches the runoff from their property; they agree
except for one provision and that is the responsibility will
terminate on sale of the property.
Future homeowners would be required to participate in the current
private road agreement in the neighborhood.
They would not agree to a 25-foot building setback from the rear of
the pads as that would be too restrictive.
They could not agree to hillside slopes to be uniformly maintained by
the homeowners maintenance association; slopes will be planted as
approved by the Engineering and Planning Department; do not want to
restrict that to the homeowners association because it would take
away the freedom from the homeowners.
Did not feel that a hillside bench drain across the lower hillside
was necessary because there ie already a bench drain on the other
side of the fence.
There was a request that nothing be built on the slopes and they do
agree with that as long as Canyon Acres occupies the site; that
condition would terminate on vacation of Canyon Acres.
Everyone is opposed tc ti,. hiking trail; visual intrusion involving
privacy and safety are of major concern to residents. No reason to
put it there in the first place; when a lot of these trails were put
on a map there was no consideration given to topography or to
adjoining lots or to how they may affect the visual i:trusion of the
owners.
Originally submitted an application for a Genera Plan Amendment;
Mr. Mayer (Parka and Recreation Department) had agreed with them at
the time and then he change3 his mind. He stated they would be
willing to do so again at the direction of the Planning Commission.
2/24/92
Page 3
PUBLIC INPUT: The major opposition was the hiking trail. Much of
the same typa of testimony has been heard at previous meeti:;a and
will not be reiterated here.
('~' It was also noted that potential buyers should be wade aware that
this is zoned for horses.
They hope if the property ie sold at some future time, whoever would
pick up the property would be held to the same standards of
agreements that were made here. They would like tha word put in
place so they would like to avoid future conflicts with the
developer.
The reason they were asking for a 26-foot property setback is that
there be some distance on those pads eo someone cannot build on the
end.
Concern was expressed regarding the bench drain; suggested
constructing a 5-foot storm drain to avoid erosion.
Discussion took place with the Commission and Mr. Mayer, Parks and
Recreation Department, regarding his position on keeping the hiking
trail while referencing the map.
Selma Mann, Deputy City Attorney, stated they need to look at the
application and the tentative map that is before them and remain
cognizant that they will need to make a finding if they should decide
to approve a tentative map that is presently in conformance with the
General Plan as conditioned.
Melanie Adams, Public Works-Engineering. She stated the elope has to
be landscaped se one unit and she would like to see the integrity of
that landscaping held in tact rather than individual homeowners
coming in later and leave a slope bare. She added they would like to
see that under the homeowners association.
Selma Mann - May want to request a reports and recommendation item
to be sure that they see the final easement configuration if there is
a General Plan Amendment.
ACTION: CEQA Mitigated Negative Declaration - Approved
Variance No. 4136 - Request for withdrawal approved
Tentative Tract Mao No. 14429 - Approved
1. On condition no. 1 add "or ae may be necessary to conform
to a future amendment to the trail plan."
2. Strengthen language on item no. 7 to make sure it is clear
that they are going to have a consistent plan for the
planting of the slopes and that the consistent plan will
remain in effect. Any revisions to the landscape F'lana
would have to be approved by the Planning Commission.
CC&Rs should specify that there is going to be no
~..~ development on the slopes.
2/24/92
Page 4
3. Add condition that all habitable structures are to be '~
setback from top of elope 15 feet. ~
4. Condition no. 9 - Henn?.ng Way should be 20 feet.
Melanie Adams - Modify condition no. 7, item 8 and specify which
slopes would be maintained by the homeowner's association. i
She further stated in reference to condition no. 9 concerning the
widening of Henning Way, that 20-feet would provide a safe roadway
and would be acceptable to them. She stated she would add one
additional sentence concerning drainage along Henning Way.
5. After the first sentence add: "That the widening shall I~
include the relocation and upgrade of existing drainage
facilities along Henning Way."
6. Add time limit to condition no. 16. Add language: "or '
within 6 months after the completion of rough grading,
whichever occurs first."
7. Add condition that they will bring back landscaped plane
for the retaining wall as shown on Lot 1.
Hellyer - They are including those issues that the
applicant stipulated to that they were in agreement with
ss stated in a letter to the Commission by Mr. McQuaid ',
dated February 15th. ~
~ecimen Tree Removal Permit No. 91-07 - Approved i
Add following condition ae suggested by staff: ~
"That the removal and replacement of specimen tree shall be ~
substantially in conformance with plans and specifications
submitted to the City of Anaheim by the petitioner and whlch
plane are on file with the Planning Department marked
Revision No. 2 of Exhibit nos. 1 and 2 and all specimen trees
shall be replaced on a 2 to 1 basis."
II
1
~,~ 2/24/92 ~,
Page 5 j
2a. CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION
2b. WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT
2c. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 3484
OWNER: FRANK H. GREINKE, P.0 Box 4159, Orange, CA 92613
AGENT: SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO., P.0. SOX 4159, Orange, CA
92613
LOCATION: 1431 North Ravmond Ave. Property is approximately
0.61 acre located at the southwest corner of
Orangefair Lane and Raymond Avenue.
To permit an automobile service station with waiver of minimum
structural setback.
Continued from the January 13, and February 10, 1992 Planning
Commission meetings.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. PC92-16
~~
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
OPPOSITION: None
PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: At last PC meeting, the Commission suggested
some revisions to their plans which they made; there was some issues
that were raised by their neighbors that they have addressed.
Concern was expressed regarding the planting of trees along aide of
their mutual property line with the respect of roots growing under
the foundation and foliage scraping the paint on their building;
request those trees be eliminated.
STAFF COMMENTS: Jonathan Borrego, Senior Planner, explained the
removal of trees would require further readvertiaing.
Selma Mann, Deputy City Attorney, stated with regard to condition no.
2 on the unsubordinated agreement that needs to be recorded to remove
the facilities--just to _~revent any misunderstanding on what they
will require on that agreement, the removal of the service station
structure is going to include below ground structures.
Approved
Approved
Granted
2/24/92
Page 6
ACTION: CEQA Negative Declaration - Approved
Waiver of Code Requirement - Approved
Conditional Use Permit No. 3484 - Granted
Add condition malting it clear what is on the plans
regarding the signs.
Added language on condition no. 2 noting that this removal
includes the station plus its associated subterranean
facilities.
Per Jonathan Borrego - Add condition requiring the removal
of the existing freeway sign and that the replacement sign
be limited to an 8-foot high monument sign. It was noted
they have shown this on the plane, but prefers to have
that as a condition of approval.
VOTE• 7-0
~ 2/24/92
Page 7
3a. CEOA MITIGATID NEXiATIVE DECLARATION
3b. WAIVER OF CDDE REOUIRII4ECF['
3C. lXXVDI'I70NAL USE PERMIT NO. 3987
Ct9NER: HABITAT I, 1875 Century Park East, Suite 1880, L.A.,
CA 90067
AGIIV4': FARANO AND KIEVET, 100 S. Anaheim Blvd., Ste. #340,
Anaheim, CA 92805
ZOCATION: 1925 West Lincnlr. Ave. Property is approximately
5.7 acres located at the northwest corner of Lincoln
Avenue and Muller Street.
To permit a "mixed use" project consisting of a 3 and 4-story,
184-unit, "deck type" apartment complex and 10,000 square feet
of ground floor commercial uses with waiver of minimum number of
parking spaces, minimum distance between buildings and required
distance to elevators.
Continued from the January 27, 1992 Planning Commission meeting.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION N0. PC92-17
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
OPl~OSITION• 22
OPPOSITION CONCERNS: Parking is an issue; did not feel that the
developer completely addressed that in light of the tenants, but in
the light of hie property; the shared parking idea violates the
requirements for separate access for commercial and residential
access to the property; the intended hours of operation from 6:OOa.m.
to 10:00p.m. does not seem consistent in sharing the parking witt: the
residents and shoppers at the retail unit; the big concern was
controlled access in and out of the residential tract; ubjection to
mixed use in this site.
Dan Parker, representing the City School District and the Union High
School District; they support staff's recommendation for denial of
the project.; new CEQA documentation is necessary should the
Commission be inclined to e~pprove this project.
.,./
Approved 1
Denied
Denied
r
2/24/92
Page 8
PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: The developer is unable to make the changes
which was previously suggested so they are bringing back the same
project for a vote from the Commission. He explained the Planning
Commission wanted to see some ownership condos and townhomes,
however, after their review of the Zoning standards and amount of
development, expenses and time that has gone into this, the developer
is unable to make those changes; he did not think that anyone would
expect the developer to came back and amend his project, which he
already has existing Zoning entitlements on, to a severe financial
prejudice.
COMMISSIOIN COMMENTS:
Messe - Concern regarding parking; this ie a mixed use; there is a
problem with guest parking which r'ans along the west aide of the
property and it could carry parking for the retail use out to 75' or
100 feet] people will park along D'.ane Way because it is closer and
did not feel he could vote for any parking waiver.
Bristol - Nothinq has changes from the time this was before us; he
has a problem with the parking; more commercial in that area will
only add to the problem, therefore, will not go with it either.
ACTION: CEQA Negative Declaration - Approved 4-3
(Commissioners Bristol, Hellyer and Zemel voting No)
Waiver of Code Requirement - Denied (5-2)
(Commissioners Messe and Bouas voting NO)
~~ Conditional Use Permit No. 3487 - Denied
VOTE: 6-1 (Commissioner Messe voting NO on CUP)
`~ i
2/24/92
Page 9
4a. CFI~A MI'l7GATED NF~APIVE DEQARATION
4b. WAIVER OF CtODE REgITIRF74F1J'P Denied
4C. Gt~NDIT20NAL USE PERh1IT N0. 3431 Denied
Denied
CWNERS: MILTON JOHNSON, CARLA BEATRICE JOHNSON, MILTON E.
JOHNSON, JR., HAZEL C. JOHNSON, 1214 W. Ratella Ave.
Anaheim, CA 92802 ~
I
IACATION: 511 - 521 South Manchester Ave.; 500 - 520 South
Walnut Street. Property is approximately 2.1 acres
located at the southwest corner of Manchester Avenue '
~I
and Santa Ana Street.
To rcatain an auto repair, towing and dismantling facility
(including the storage and retail sale of used auto parts) and a '
temporary office trailer with waiver of required improvement of
parking and outdoor storage area, minimum structural setback and I
improvement of setback areas.
Continued from the October 7, November 18, 1991 and January 13,
1992 Planning Commission meetings.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. PC92-18 _
--------------------------------------------------------------------- I
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
OPPOSITION: None
PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Explained he heard rumor that Caltrans would
be taking this property for I-5 widening. (Traffic Engineering
explained this property would not be affected by freeway widening; '
and also indicated plan not acceptable as submitted.)
I
COMMISSION COMMENTS: Soils report indicates soil contaminates over
acceptable limits. Concerned about safety, pointed out there is a
school nearby.
STAFF COMMENTS: Fire Department not ready to support anything on
this site due to need for environmental assessment; Bruce Freeman, ~,
Code Enforcement, stated he forwarded a memo to the Planning !
Department and the property ie still in violation. He recommended
denial of the project.
i
ACTION: CEQA Negative Declaration - (Denied on thn basis that the !
information needed to make the CEQA findings is not
available).
Waiver of Code Requirement - Denied
Conditional Uae Permit No. 3451 - Denied
~ VOTE• 7-0
li
2/24/92 ~
Page 10
s
5a. C~UA NEGATIVE DEY.T,ARATION Approved
y,~ Sb. WAIVER dF WDE REKXIIRII4ETIT Approved
`
Sc. LUNDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3493 Granted
2 years
CiVNER: ASKLEPLOS HOSPITAL CORPORATION, 249 E. Ocean Blvd.,
Ste. 600, Long Beach, CA y0802
AGQPl: RICHARD GOLD, 3350 W. Hall Road, Anaheim, CA 92804
I
ILL^APION: 3350 West Ba11 Road. Property is approximately i
i.69 acres located on the south side of Ball Road and ~
approximately 1,068 feet east of the centerline of
Knott Ave.
s
To permit a mobile medical unit (trailer) with waiver of minimum
number of parking spaces. i
I
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. PC92-19
FOLLOWING IS A SUMM?~RY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSZDEFtED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
OPPOSITION: 4 (12 people were present earlier, but left the meeting) i
l OPPOSITION CONCERNS: Noise, smell of diesel generator, safety issues
and electro magnetic levels were of concern. '
PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Did not want to halt operation for 60 days;
important to health and safety of patients; will eliminate generator;
can baffle air condition unit; relocate unit closer to railroad
track; no radiation but property is posted because it could cause
pacemaker to malfunction; machines not shut off because of damage and
time to get back in operation.
STAFF COMMENTS: Code Enforcement stated sound level tests showed
noise is within minimum acceptable level.
ACTION: CEQA Negative Declaration - Approved
Waiver of Code Requirement - Approved
i
Conditional Use Permit No. 3493 - Granted
1. Granted for 2 years; limited to operation 2 days a
week and one night;
2. No delivery of unit after 7:OOp.m. or before
7:OOa.m., and Condition No. 3 amended to reflect that
change
3. Build pad for temporary unit within 30 days,
relocated towards center of property at edge of
paving.
4. Baffle air conditioning unit immediately ~o maximum
~"~ extent feasible.
VOTE• 7-0
2/24/92
6d. CEbA NEGATIVE DECLARATION i
i
Approved '
6b. WAIVER OF CODE REtZTJIRII+mV'l
te''
' Approved
Granted
a
P NO. 3490
6c. CONDITIONAL USE PE~II
UilnVFd2: WEIR PARTNERS, LTD., 10 Corporate Park, Ste. 220,
Irvine, CA 92714
i
ICX.APION: 701 Weir Canyon Road (Ste. 19). Property is
approximately 11.9 acres located at the southwest
corner of rleir Canyon Road and Serrano Avenue.
To permit on-premise sale and consumption of alcoholic beverages i
in conjunction with a semi-enclosed restaurant with waiver of
minimum landscaped setback adjacent to a scenic highway.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. PC92-20 I
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
O~PCSiTION: None
I
PETITIONER'S COMMENSS: Explained there is a 6-foot high decorative
wall along the boundary next to condos, and they will be putting in a
number of large trees, patio is to be 2 feet below ground level;
would like to keap it open until 10 or 11 p.m. on Friday and
Saturday.
ACTION: CEQA Negative Declaration - Approved
Waiver of Code Requirement - Approved
Conditional Use Permit No. 3490 - Granted
1. To close at 9:OOp.m Sunday through Thursday and 10:00p.m.
Friday and Saturday
2. That there shall be no bar or lunge area maintained for
the purpose of sale, service or consumption of alcoholic
beverages diroctly to patrons for consumption.
3. That food service with an available meal shall be
available until closing on each day of operation.
4. That there shall be no amplified live entertainment or
dancing permitted on the premises at any time.
5. That entertainment provided shall not be audible beyond
the area under the control of this business.
6. That there shall be no pool tables or coin-operated games
maintained upon the premises at any time.
VOTE• 7-0
2/24/92
~,,,/ Page 12
7a. C A TIVE DEY.7~ARATION Continued
7b. WAIVER OF DUDE RECXIIRF~•1rNT to 3/23/92
~~` 7c. GUNDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 3492
7d. DEVEG7PMFIV'l AREA 5 OF SPECIFIC PLAN N0. 88-I
QVNER: WOODCREST DEVELOPMENT INC., 23046 Avenita Carlotta,
Ste. 250, Laguna Hills, CA 92653
AGE[~l1': MCG ARCHITECTS, 18201 Von Karmen Ave., Ste 250, i
Trvine, CA 92715
LOCATION: Property is approximately 3.9 acres located at the
northeast cUrner ~f Weir Canon Road and Canyon Vis-a_
ive
i
To permit a commercial retail center consisting of a 1,825
square foot car wash with gasoline sales, 14,232 square feet of
automobile repair uses and 11,665 square feet of reta~~ shops
with waiver of minimum landscaped setback adjacent to a scenic
highway.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. --
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NCT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
OPPOSITI(.:i: 4 people present, petition with 90 signatures presented
and 40 letters indicated opposition.
OPPOSITION CONCE_.irS: Increased traffic, noise from air compr~ssora
and tools, gasoline fumes, adverse impact on property values, should
not have approved this use originally before homeowners lived there;
did not want alcohol sales, felt there are ample eating
establishments in the area, concern about safety of children; felt
open space should be natural, people paid premiums to have view and
would be looking right down onto this development; concerned that
they would oiork on vehicles on weekends, bus a~op at corner where
school children are picked up and felt it would be hazardous;
concerned about hours of operation to midnight; dangerous due to
steep grade of street and due to curves; location of sign and felt
light would shine into bedroom windows; not informed about proposed
use of this property when they purchased their property; immense
noise from mechanical repairs with doors open during day and work
being done on concrete floors.
2/24/92
~ Page 13
PETITIONER'S COMMENTS: Have approval for this use and are prepared
to forward if this revised plan is not approved. This project is
better with site coverage at 168, car wash was larger on original
plane and will be raduced to 1825 sq. ft., number of gasoline pumps
raduced from 6 to 2, and 24-hour mini-mart has been eliminated,
lowering building elevation by 15 feet, hours of operation can be
negotiated, car wash would only be open until 6 or 7 p.m. and
eating establishment until maybe midnight; would adhere to AQMD
regulations pertaining to gasoline fumes, will recycle water so there
would be little water runoff, not relying on business from freeway
traffic, but from people who are already in the area. Larger car
wash would not work until Weir Canyon Road goes on through to
Jamboree Road. Explained there are materials available that would
dampen the noise of the concrete floor.
COMMISSION COMMENTS: Hellyer - Noted there are four car washes in
the area; Meese - pointed out alcohol sales were not allowed;
Henninger - felt the matter should be continued so they meet with the
neighbors and develop a revised plan to address the noise concern,
ours of operation, air q~.ality, etc.
STAFF COMMENTS: Suggested the developer meet with staff, due to
extensive testimony heard today, to work out mitigation measures for
the noise and visual intrusion; pointed out on latest revised plans,
trash enclosure ie shown within the 100-foot setback and be removed.
COMMISSION COMMENTS: Explained there is an existing approved
conditional use permit for a use like this and this a revision and
the developer has the right to develop that original plan.
ACTION: Continued to Marc: 23, 1992.
~,~ 2/24/92
Page 14
88. ChI~A NFS~'IVE DE~GARATION Approved
8b. WAIVER OF CUDE REt7ULRII~V'1' Approved
e~
Y , 8C. GtxIDITIONAL USE PERbiI'1' NO. 3491 Granted
Lz9NER: FRANCHISE REALTY CORPORATION, ONE M:: DONALDS PLAZA,
OAKBAOOY., ILLINOIS 60521
AGE1~ll': JIM FRISBIE, 1060 A. Ortega Way, Placentia, CA 92670
LOCATION: 2411 West Ball Raid. Property is approximately 0.5
acre located on the north side of Ball Road and
approximately 150 feet west of the centerline of
Gilbert Street.
To permit a semi-enclosed restaurant and children's play area
with waiver of minimum number of parking spaces.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION N0. PC92-21
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
OPPOSITION: None
ACTION: CEQA Negative Declaration - Approved
Waiver of Code Requirement - Approved
Conditional Use Permit No. 3491 - Granted
VOTE• 7-0
2/24/92
~~ Page 15
.r,
9a. CAA NEX:ATIVE DFX:LARA470N
9b. RECl,ASSIF7CATION NO. 91-92-11
QIIIVERS: KENNEY GOLF ENTERPRISES, INC., 3200 East Carpenter
Ave., Anaheim, CA 92806
7ACATION: 3200 East C~penter Avenue Property is
approximately 5.9 acres located on the south side of
Carpenter Avenue approximately 80 feet east cf the
centerline of Shepard Street.
RS-A-43,000 to the ML Zone.
RECLASSIFICATION RESOLUTION N0. PC92-22
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
OPPOSITION: None
ACTION: CEQA Negative Declaration - Approved
Reclaesif.'.cation No. 91-92-11 - Granted
(Delete condition No. 1)
VOTE• 7-0
Approved
Granted ~~
i
2/24/92
Page 16
10a. CEnA NFX~ATIVE DEL^GARATION (PREVIOUSLY APP%7VID) Approved
~y IOb. WAIVER OF GLIDE REGYIIRD~TAl (READVERI7SID)
d'ISID
W
` Approved
d
G
t
ET
)
lOC. CONDITIONAL USE PERhfIT NO. 3392 (REA
~ ran
e
CX9NER: DAVID CHAVEZ, 4420 E. LA PALMA AVE., ANAHEIM, CA
92807
LJC~Y!'ION: 9420 E. La Palma Avenue. Property is approximately
1.8 acres located at the south aide of La Palma
Avenue and approximately 300 feet west of the
canterline of Lakeview Avenue.
To permit a cellular telephone facility and 85-foot high tower
(previously 60-foot high) with waiver of maximum structural
height, minimum aide yard setback and minimum rear yard setback.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION N0. PC92-23
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO HE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
OPPOSITION: None
CA TION: CEQA Negative Declaration - Approved
Waiver of Code Requirement - Approved
Conditional Uae Permit No. 3392 - Granted
VOTE• 7-0
2/24/92
~-./ Page 17
,-,
17.. RER0RI5 ARID REDATIONS: ~
A. Ct7NDI'I'IONAL USE PEFiM1tIT NO. 1660 - RFI0UES1' FOR Granted
TERMINATION: Lewis Miehveki, requests termination of
Conditional Use Permit No. 1660
i
TERMINATION RESOLUTION N0. PC92-24 E
i
VARIANCE NO 4035 - RFXXIFST FtOR EXTENSION OF TIME 110 Q7MPLY Approved
WITFI CtONDI'I'IONS OF APPR7VAL: Lewis Mishreki requests To expire
extension of time for property located at 1001 N. West 3-12-93
Street.
B. Ct7NDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 3449 - RE20C>Sl' FtOR EXTENSION OF Approved
TIME 1t0 (17,`fp],Y WI'l7f CnNDI'1'IONS OF APP%1VAL: Stephen A. To expire ~
Quartararo, requests extension of time for property located 4-7-92
at 1360 S. Anaheim Blvd.
C. RFX.GASSIFICATIOP? NO. 84-85-04 AND GYJNDI'I70NAL USE PERMI'!' NO. Granted
2605 - REQUEST FOR TERMINATION: Daniel Lee requests
termination of Reclassification No. 84-85-04 and Conditional
Use Permit No. 2605 for property located at the northwest
corner of La Palma and Imperial Highway.
TERMINATION RESOLUTION N0. PC92-25
12. DISCDSSION:
None
ADJOURNMENT•
The Planning Commission adjourned at 7:OSp.m. to the Planning
Commission Work Session to be held on March 2, 1992, at
3:OOp.m. in the City of Anaheim Council Chambers.
2/24/92
Page 18
1,,,/