Minutes-PC 1993/11/01.~
REGULAR MEETING OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
MONDAY, NOVEMBER 1, 1993, AT 11:00 A.M.
PRELIMINARY PLAN REVIEW PUBLIC HEARING
(PUBLIC TESTIMONY)
11:00 A.M. 1:30 P.M.
10:00 A.M. TOUR OF THE CANYON AREA RELATIVE TO DIRECTIONAL SIGNS AND A TOUR
OF THE AUTO CENTER LOCATED IN THE VICINITY OF BALL ROAD AND THE 57
FREEWAY.
ACTION AGENDA
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: BOYDSTUN, CALDWELL, HENNINGER, MAYER, PERAZA, TAIT
COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: MESSE
STAFF PRESENT: Selma Mann, Deputy CityAttomey, Jonathan Borrego, Senior Planner, Greg
Hastings, Zoning Division Manager, Alfred Yaida, Melanie Adams, Richard
Bruckner, Peggy Flanagan, Code Enforcement
PROCEDURE TO EXPEDITE PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARINGS
,_ 1. The proponents in applications which are not contested will have five minutes to present their
~ evidence. Additional time will be granted upon request ff, in the opinion of the Commission,
such additional time will produce evidence Important to the Commission's consideration.
2. In contested applications, the proponents and opponent will each be given ten minutes to
present their case unless additional time is requested and the complexity of the matter
warrants. The Commission's considerations are not determined by the length of time a
participant speaks, but rather by what is said.
3. Staff Reports are part of the evidence deemed received by the Commission in each hearing.
Copies are available to the public prior to the meeting.
4. The Commission will withhold questions until the public hearing Is closed.
5. The Commission reserves the right to deviate from the foregoing ff, fn its opinion, the ends of
fairness to all concerned will be served.
6. All documents presented to the Planning Commission for review (n connection with any
hearing, including photographs or other acceptable visual representations or non~documentary
evidence, shall be retained by the Commission for the public record and shall be available for
public inspections.
7. At the end of the scheduled hearings, members of the public will be allowed to speak on items
of Interest which are within the Jurisdiction of the Planning Commission, and/or agenda items.
Each speaker will be allotted a maximum of five (5) minutes to speak.
~-' AC110193.WP
ia. CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION Previously Approved Approved
ib. WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT Approved, in part
1c. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0.3278 Readvertised Grafted, in part
OWNER: EL VEE, INC., ATiN: Paui Bostwick, 200 NJ. Midway Dr.,
Anaheim, CA 92805
LOCATION: 200 West Midwa Dv rive. Property is approximately 6.65
acres located on the southwest comer of Midway Drive and
Zeyn Street.
To permit a 5-space expansion to an existing mobile home/trailer park for
an ultimate total of 189 mobile home/recreational traiier spaces wfth waiver
of minimum front yard setback, minimum side yard setback and minimum
rear yard setback.
Continued from the October 18, 1993 Planni~~g Commission meeting.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION N0. PC93-117 SR5097KB.WP
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
OPPOSITION: None
Paul Bostwick, applicant, explained the request Is to expand the existing mobilehome/
recreational vehicle park by 5 spaces; that there is no way to redesign the project enabling
traffic circulation off the street; that this is a long-term residency park and guests usually
stay 6 months or longer, with very few overnight guests.
PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Caldwell - No hardship was shown for granting waiver. Asked ff landscaping setback
requirement on Midway could be met; noting the desire to up~3rade the aesthetic appeal of
the City and wanted to have as much landscaping as possible. (Applicant explained they ~
have plans to landscape between the mobilehomes; and that there is no way to redesign the
project to meet Code requirements).
Tait -Questioned the length of guests stay and agreed there is no justification for granting
the waiver.
11/01/93
Page 2
`~
Foydstun -Pointed out these five lots are larger than existing spaces. Asked ff addftional
landscaping could be added all along Midway. Pointed out the proposal is consistent with
what Is in the area.
Henninger -Would feel more comfortable with approval since this is a long-term residency
park and would be more comfortable ff there was a way to add a condkion regarding the
length of stay; and that this Is a minor addftion to an existing park.
STAFF COMMENTS:
Alfred Yalda, Traffic Engineering, recommended traffic circulation should be on site, and not
or the city street. (Mr. Bostwick explained this Is the same access situation as the one at
the west end of Midway and ft works well.)
Jonathan Borrego -Planning -Might be possible to reailgn the three spaces which are
perpendicular to Midway Drive so they were parallel wfth Midway DrNe, allowing more space
for landscaping, but that would result in elimination of one spy ~~. (Applicant responded
eliminating a space would present a financial hardship.)
ACTION:
CEQA NEGAT;VE DECLARATION (APPROVED)
VOTE: 6.0 (Messe absent)
Caldwell -offered motion for denial of waiver of landscaping along Midway. (No one
seconded the motion)
Tait - suggested a continuance so the applicant could review & possibly revise the plan.
Henninger - stated a little bit of extra landscaping on this one site doesn't do that much
good, but trees planted along the entire frontage on Midway would be an improvement.
(Mr. Bostwick agreed to planting frees along the entire frontage on Midway) (Engineering -
explained the trees should be planted on private property.)
Henninger -felt the trees should be minimum 15-gallon canopy type trees and the species
and spacing should conform to the Parks Department requirements.
ACTIOY: 1. Approved CEQA Negative Declaration
2. Approved Waiver of Code Requirement, In part: Approved waivers (a) and
(b) and denied waver (c) be:ause it is not required since the rear lot line
wilt be eliminated by a Int Tine adJustment.
3. Granted Conditional Use Permit No. 3276 as readvertised and added the
following condftion of approval:
"That the petitioner shall plant minimum fifteen (15) gallon canopy trees
along the entire frontage of Midway Drive.'
VOTE: 6.0 (Commissioner Messe absent)
11/01/93
Page 3
2a. CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION I Approved
2b. WAIVER OF CyDE REQUIREAAENT Approved
2c. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3642 Granted
OWNER: DORIS K RICHTER, 5505 Garden Grove Blvd., #150,
Westminster, CA 92663
AGENT: JAVIER AND OFELLIA CASTELLANOS, 1086 N. State College
Blvd., Anaheim, CA 92806
LOCATION: 1086 N State College Boutevarcl. Property Is approximately
9.07 acres located north and east of the northeast comer of
La Palma Avenue and State College Boulevard.
To retain arestaurant/night club addition including a public dance hall ~~~kh
on•premise sales and consumption of alcoholic beverages with waiver of
minimum number of parking spaces.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION N0. PC93-11
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
OPPOSITION: None
Javiar Castellanos,agent, explained they wish to expand the existing restaurnt/nightclub to
Include a public dance hall wfth on-premises sales and consumption of alcoholic beverages
and a waiver of minimum number of parking spaces.
PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Boydstun -Pointed gut Item K of the conditions should be corrected to read "pool tables";
and thrR the hours of operation should be 6 to 2 a.m.
Henninger -Police Department has added a variety of conditions and asked if the petitioner
had read all those conditions. (Mr. Castellanos responded he had read the condtions and
agreed to comply,}
11/01/93
Page 4
`..
':i'
i
ACTION: Approved CEQA NegatNe Declaration
Approved WaNer of Code fiequlrement
~ Granted Condftionai Use Permit No. 3642 and modified the following conditions
of approval to read as follows:
6-k. There shall be no pool tables arcnin-operated games maintained upon
the premises at any t(me.
6-m. The restaurant expansion shall only be utilized and offer entertainment
and or dancing on Friday, Saturday and Sunday nights from 6 p.m. to 2
a.m.
VOTE: 6.0 (Commissioner Messe absent)
':;..~.
11/01/93
Page 5
~-
3a. CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION Approved
3b. WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT Approved, in part
3c. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 3840 Granted, in part
OWNER: PYRAMID INVESTMENT CORP., 600 Montgomery Street,
San Francisco, CA 94111
AGENT: P/A ARCHITECTS INC, 856 Production Place, Newport
Beach, CA 92663
LOCATION: 1701 West Medical Center Drive (Emerald Court .
Property Is approximately 7.0 acres located on the north
side of Medical Center Dfire and approximately 585 feet
west of the centerline of Euclid Street.
To permit a 16-unk (16-bed) addftlon to an existing 179-unft (206 bed)
senior citizen's retirement facility with waiver of required parking lot
landscaping and minimum number of parking spaces.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION N0. PC93-119
SR5080KB.wp
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
OPPOSITION: None
Thomas Pokorski, Transamerica Realty Services, 600 Montgomery Street, San Francisco,
presented a brochure describing this facility and explained this is a congregate care housing
facility, designed as an independent living facility for seniors who want a little more
assistance but are very Independent; that they are generally in their 70's; that the project
was developed in 1986 and they got approval of the conditional use permit and met all the
City's requirements for parking and setbacks at that time; that those requirements have
since changed, prompting this request. He explained the congregate care/independent
living has changed and as the seniors get older, they do not like to move and that generates
'aging in place" and they need "assisted living" which is more than congregate care services
such as housekeeping, transportation, meals, etc.
He explained In 1990 they modified some of the existing units to serve as assisted living
units which included fire alarms, building separations for fire walls and exiting requirements:
that when the modifications were made, they had to eliminate some of the parking spaces
due to the separation requirements; and that those spaces were locked and used for
storage. He added they would like to convert those spaces to assisted living units, meeting
the requirements of the State Social Services Department.
11/01/93
Page 6
He stated Code requires that the parking would have to be increased but they have done
some studies and found currently t'r~ey use about 5096 of the parking provkled which is a
- total of 165 spaces and are proposing to add 8 spaces for a total of 173 spaces, but need
far less.
Bruce Hogan, General Manager, Emerald Court, 25002 Wandering Lane, Lake Forest, CA
92630, explained wfth assisted living, they provide assistance with bathing, dressing,
grooming, monitor!ng their medications, taking them to and from the dining room, etc.; that
the average age of the reskfent is 84 years old; that very few drive and currently only 1196 of
their assisted living residents have cars in the lot; that they have a 26-passenger bus and an
8-passenger van which provides transportation 7 days a week.
He responded to Chairman Persza that they currently have i95 residents and about 28 are
assisted living residents and they would like to add 16.
PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Caldwell -Convinced our parking standards are too stringent for the use of the property as h
is now and would be in favor of the expansion, but would like for landscaping to be included
in the parking lot. Felt reducing the parking by 8 spaces and having 22 trees instead would
be a fair tradeoff. (Applicant responded he would not object to landscaping, but that it
would eliminate 8 parking spaces); that the property has ample landscaping now and the
additional landscaping would be at the rear of the property and not on the street frontage
and that they are surrounded by retell uses, a freeway, and a mobllehome park.
STAFF COMMENTS:
Jonathan Borrego, Senior Planner, stated after hearing the more detailed explanation of the
use and after discussion wfth the Engineering Division, staff has come to the conclusion that
a different parking standard should probably be applied to this type of use and referred to
Code Section 18.06.050.0269 which is the parking standard for congregate care/senior
citizen's apartment project which requires .8 space per bed, requiring a total of 178 spaces
for this use including the expansion, which is 5 less than proposed, and that significantly
reduces the waiver. He referred to a future phase proposed and stated that project should
conform to Code, but did not think there would be a problem. He added ff a problem
developed, one of these conditional use permits could be set for public hearing to address
the problem.
STAFF COMMENTS: Made a correction to the staff report. The Congregate
Care/Senior Citizen's Apartment Complex Parking Standard (Code
Section 18.06.050.0269) is the standard applicable to this type of
use. It parks this protect at .8 of a space per bed and requires a
total of 178 parking spaces.
11/01/93
Page 7
ACTION: 1. Approved CEQA Negative Declaration
2. Approved Waiver of Code Requirement, in part: the applicant withdrew
~ request for waiver (a) pertaining to landscaping and Commission approved
waiver (b) requiring a minimum of 185 parking spaces.
3. Granted Condftional Use Permft No. 3640, in part.
VOTE: 6-0 (Commissioner Messe absent)
,;,v~s
11/01/93
Page 8
4a. ~EQA NEGATIVE DECLARATION Previously Approved Approved
4b. VARIANCE NO.4053 'Granted for
2 years (to
OWNER: DON V. EDMONDS and GARNET A. EDMONDS, POST expire 11-1-95)
OFFICE BOX 42, Pistal RNer, Oregon 97444
AGENT: P.NAHEIM DODGE, 1120-1126 S. Anaheim Blvd., Anahelm, CA
92805
LOCATION: 1381 Auto Center Drive. Property is approximately 2.34
acres located on the north side of Auto Center Drhre and
located approximately 720 feet west of the centerline of
Phoenix Club Drive.
Waivsr of maximum sign area to construct a 39-square foot addftlon to an
existing 923-square foot freestanding sign.
VARIANCE RESOLUTION N0. PC93-120
SR5067KH.wp
------------------------------------------------------------
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
OPPOSITION: None
Robert McDonald, Chrysler Corporation, agent, explained the need for the sign is the
economy and the need for exposure.
PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED.
COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Boydstun - Asked ff the portion around the sign at the bottom could be lowered and the
Dodge sign adderi between that and what is there so k doesn't appear to be something
added to the bottom. (Applicant responded that is a structural part of the sign; that there
will be two or three addffional dealers and maybe they could change the whole structure at
that time.)
Caldwell -suggested the sign be designed to Include the two future dealers now.
Applicant responded that would create a financial hardship for the applicant.
Henninger - Agreed a sign is needed, and would agree to approval for a period of one or
two years and allow the dealers to submit a revised sign that would address the needs of all
11/01/93
Page 9
~~
the dealers. He added there is a "dealer assoclation' and he felt staff should Inform the
association that it is the consensus of the Commission that there will not be any additional
add-ens to this sign.
Mayer -Agreed and asked that a condition be included that this is a temporary addition and
no others can go below h. She asked H the lettering will conform to the existing sign.
(Appilcant responded K will conform.)
Boydstun -Felt they do need the exposure.
STAFF COMMENTS:
Jonathan Bortego, Senior Planner, explained the original sign was approvoed for 780 sq. ft.
but was constructed at 962 sq. feet, minus this 39 square feet, so the approval would be for
962 square feet and that would include the existing sign and this request. He explained this
property is in the ML Zone and this sign is actually within the setback area and they are
limited to 100 square feet.
Henninger -Could approve it for a maximum sign of 962 sq. ft. including this request for 39
sq. ft. for a period of 2 years; due to the unique use of the property as an auto mall, and
denial would be denying a privilege granted to others.
Mayer -Wanted it to be designated as a temporary sign.
Caldwell -Asked iF staff has reviewed the need for signs at this auto mall, comparing it to the
sign code, and suggested possibly a separate sign program because of the unique needs.
He suggested maybe Redevelopment and Planning staff should work together.
Tait -Would like to see some imagination used in the overall sign program.
Mr. Borrego responded Redevelopment has been working with the dealers and did get
agreement on the original sign.
11/01/93
Page 10
ACTION: Approved CEOA Negative Declaration
Granted Variance No. 4053 for to two years, to expire on November 1, 1995.
MOTION: Commissioner Henninger offered a Motion seconded by
Commissioner Caldwell and MOTION CARRIED (Commissioner Messe absent)
that the Anaheim Cky °lanning Commission does horeby direct staff to
communicate to the Auto Dealer's Association that this is the last addkion they
anticipate making to the existing sign and that the Association shall address the
sign issue and come back to the Planning Commission wkhin eighteen (18)
months from the date of this motion wkh a detailed sign program for the full
build-out of the auto mall.
VOTE: 6-0 (Commissioner Messe absent)
RIGFIT OF APPEAL
Selma Mann -pointed out this variance Is for this 39 square feet but k also includes the
violation of the previous sign, and the variance for the entire sign will expire fn two years, so
all the owners will have an interest seeing the matter resolved.
`L~
11/01/93
Page 11
CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION Previously Approved Approved
Granted for
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0.310f Readvertfsed 5 years
OWNER: SMOOKE and SONS INVESTMENT CO., P.O. Box 1311, , rn
ir
't219p
Attn: R. Smooke, Los Angelas, CA 90053-1311 a
g
LOCATION: 800 East Katella Avenue. Property is approximately 2.4
acres located on the south side of f:atelia Avenue and
approximately 590 feet west of the centerline of Lewis Street.
Amendment or deletion to a condffion of approval pertaining to the time
limitation of a previously approved truck sales and service agency.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION N0. PC93-121
-----------------------------------------------------
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. NOT TO BE
CONSIDERED OFFICIAL MINUTES.
OPPOSITION: None
Richard Smooke, 405 Mateo Street, Los Angeles, 90013, requested a 5-year extension (rather
than 3 years as recommended in the staff report) since the property has been used similarly
since 1968, that the property is being considered for possible partial, full or no taking by
Caltrans for widening I.5 freeway but they still don't know for sure what Caltrans plans are.
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED.
Responding to Commissioner Taft, the applicant explained the tenant likes being in Anaheim
and would like to stay at that location; that the lease expires in 1995, and the tenant is willing
to sign an extension ff they know Caltrans Is not going to take the property. ~
Alfred Yalda, Traffic Engineering, explained there is a counter on the 2nd floor where the
public can get Information regarding the I-5 widening and Mr. Smooke may be able to get
more detailed Information there regarding the widening.
ACTION: Approved CEQA Negative Declaration
Granted Conditional Use Permit No. 3101 for 5 years, to expire on 12-19-98.
VOTE: 6-0 (Commissioner Messe absent)
11/01/93
Page 12
;~
6. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
A. CONDITIONAL USE' PERMIT NO 2905 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Set all 3 CUPS for public
-. N0.3253 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0.3414: infffated by the hearing for possible ~
A,nahelm Planning Commission. Informational for the Planning Commission revocation or changes ,
pertaining to the status of on-she and off-site parking, number of theater seats, to condffions of approval
construction of the Cinemapolis theater parking structure and the development
of Imperial Promenade shopping center.
Continued from the May 17, 1993 Planning Commission meeting.
Bill Steele, one of three property owners of Anaheim Hills Village, retail property
directly on the south side of La Palma at Imperial, stated staff's
recommendations deal with two Issues, the installation of a separate traffic
signal and review of a series of parking conditions and other conditions relating
to the theater and Imperial Promenade developments. He stated in view of the
significant and serious traffic congestion and numerous accidents which have
and continuo to occur, he would request that the Commission segregate these
into'Wo actions and vote separately on the signalizatfon.
He stated on behalf of Anaheim HIIis Village, they have a tatter signed by all
the property owners indicating a willingness to pay 25%, up to $31,250, of the
cost of the proposed signalization; that they understand that a writte,t
agreement between the theater, Imperial Promenade, and the owner of the
bank property, has been previously entered into and recorded which obligates
those parties to pay 50% of the cost of the signalization and through
discussions with the Redevelopment Agency, they understand Mr. Richard
Bruckner will recommend that the Redevelopment Agency pick up the balance.
Bruce Sanborn, representing Cinemapolis, stated they agree wffh what Mr.
Steele has said and are looking forward to approval and a speedy installation
of the signal.
Commissioner Henninger asked ff the issue regarding the traffic signal was
included as information or does the Commission have to take any action.
Alfred Yalda, Assistant Traffic Engineer, stated the estimated cost for the signai
is $270,000 and the City would have to have the money deposited to a City
account before the installation is started. He added the cost is only $270,000 ff
the cable is already there and ff the cost is less, the money would be refunded.
He stated no addffionai improvements would be made and it will be connected
to the most westerly signal. He responded to Commissioner Henninger that ff
the cost is more than $270,000, the City would request the addfflonal money,
but that is not likely.
Henninger -asked the status of the traffic study. (Mr. Yaida responded staff
has met several times wfth the property owners and has put together a
proposal to send to a consultant to come up wfth a report as to what the
parking demand is for Cinemapolis and Imperial Promenade and some
11/01/93
Page 13
L./
suggested solutions; and that the cost of that study is approximately $12,000
and that should be shared 50/50 by Promenade and Cinemapolis; that
Cinemapolis inklally indicated they were willing to pay for ft, but then came
back wfth the old condiions for approval, but the Promenade representative
indicated they were not willing to pay for any parking study.)
Mr. Sanbom stated they do not feel the traffic signal Issue is resolved.
Henninger -Responded the Issue is not resolved, but the Commission does not
have to take any action on it and staff wil! continue to work with them to get
some financial agreements in place to Install the traffic signal.
Mr. Sanbom stated the signal is 100% paid for and ft doesn't matter what the
cost is; that Redevelopment is going to pay the difference and they have been
working with staff for over two years and hoped the Commission would give
staff direction today to do k wfth due diligence.
Henninger -responded all property owners need to get the financial
agreements signed and money in escrow to get the signal installed.
ACTION:
Henninger -Moved to set Condklonal Use Pemft Nos. 2905, 3414 and 3253 for
rehearing for possible revocation or possible changes to the conditions of
approval. Motion seconded by Tait and MOTION CARRIED (Commissioner
Masse absont).
Mayer -Referred to letter submitted by Mr.Debeikes and asked ff this includes
his property and if he would have to attend and be a part of the discussion.
Henninger responded it does Include that property.
Mr. Steele stated regarding the signal, that this is a very dangerous skuation
and has existed for quite some time and they have been working with staff for
a long time and it has been exacerbated by the increase in the parking and the
variances that have been approved across the street; and asked for direction
from the Commission on how to move forward; that they have been responsive
as owners to staff inquiries and requests and have agreed to pay their share.
(Commissioner Henninger suggested Mr. Steele bring their check to the City
for deposit and then tell the other property owners that he has paid their share
and asked them to pay their share.
Mr. Bruckner stated he was Informed recently that there isn't a full agreement
on the cost sharing and that the owners of Imperial Promenade are not
prepared to participate, but that Redevelopment has always agreed to be a full
partner in this and once that agreement is reached, Redevelopment will be
ready to proceed.
Commissioner Henninger clarified the Commission is not involved in that issue
and that the Traff(c Engineer will continue to work with the property owners.
11/01/93
Page 14
Mr. Steele stated the cost estimate results in an anticipated shortfall according
to Mr. Yalda and he understood there is a $100,000 increment of that cost Just
recently added and people familiar with the exact Improvements which are in
plane are prepared to say that component is not necessary at a;l which would
allow the existing dollars to be adequate.
Mr. Yalda responded that is not correct; that at the last meeting the estimate
was presented and they will stand by that estimate; that Mr. Paul Singer
suggested that them Is existing cable which could be used and the Ciry's
technician checked shat cable and K is ffffeen years old and the Iffe expectancy
of that cable is fifteen years and h is not known ff that cable will work and the
Cky cannot start installation of a signal ff there is not enough money in the
budget for it.
Commissioner Henninger stated the Commission should not argue this area of
detail at this meeting and has instructed staff to get this resolved as quickly as
possible
Commissioner Mayer stated she thought the Commissioners all realize this is a
dangerous sRuation and hope that the owners are all working to make sure the
money gets In place and Shat this is taken care of as quicky as possible.
Chairman Peraza clarffled the rehearings would probably take place on January
10, 1994.
Paul Singer asked to speak and Chairman Peraza asked that he discuss the
matter with the Trafflc Engineering Department.
B. PROPOSAL FOR DIRECTIONAL SIGN PROGRAM IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT Recommended approval
OF-WAY: Requested by Mike Wilson, Temeka Advertising. of directional s(gn
program submitted by
Continued from the September 20 and October 4, 1993 Planning Commisslon Temeka Advertising to
meetings. City Counci:
(3-2; Commissioners
ACTION CONTINUED: They further recommended that the Anaheim Municipal Peraza and Tait No)
Code be amended to authorize the selected sign company to remove illegal
signs within the pubUc right of way. If this program gets adopted by Clty
Council, it shall come back to the Planning Commisslon for review and
approval of sign designs and locations.
C. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 3593 REQUEST FOR PLANNING Found revised door plans
COMMISSION DETERMINATION OF SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE: to be in substantial
Allen Ornstein requests Planning Commission review of revised plans for conformance with
substantial conformance determination regarding Condftional Use Permit No. praviously approved
3593 (to permit the on-premise sale and consumption of alcoholic beverages exhibits
In conjunction with arestaurant/billiard center). Property is located at 314 N.
Beach Blvd.
11/01/93
Page 15
~~
D PROPOSED CODE ,AMENDMENT PERTAINING TO FLAGS. BANNERS Recommended adoption
. AND SPECIAL EVENT PERMITS: Requested by Planning Department Staff. to the City Council
E. REQUEST FOR BOUNDARY CHANGE TO THE
COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA: Granted
m
B
dst
Requested by Anaheim Redevelopment Staff. Messe and
n
o
p ryaza absent)
RESOLUTION NO. PC93.122
F. RE LA ; IFICATION NO 92 93-01 AND VARIANCE NO 4194 - REQUEST
NS F Approved
(to expire on 9-9.94)
~R EXTENSION OF TIME TO COMPLY WITH CONDITI
pPPR VALi Charles E. Gamble requests extension of limn to comply with
conditions of approval for ReclassiFlcation No. 92-93.01 (re~~lassiflcation from
the RS-A-43,000 to the RS-7200 Zone) and Variance No. 4134 (waiver of
minimum lot area, minimum front yard setback and required lot frontage to
construct 5-single-family residences). Property is located at 2001 W. Folsom
Street.
G. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 3262 -FOR REVIEW OF REVISED Determined revised plans
to be In substantial
PLANS FOF SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE DETERMINATION TO
PERMI', A SERVI^-~ STATION/CARWASH FACILITY: Bob Nickelson conformance wft~i
requests Planning Commission review of revised plans for substantial previously approved
conformance determination regarding Conditional Use Permit No. 3262 (to plans
permit a service station/carwash facility). Property is located at northwest
comer of Weir Canyon Road and Monte Vista Road.
H CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 3460 REQUEST FOR AONE-YEAR Approved
. RETROACTIVE EXTENSION OF TIME TO COMPLY WITH CONDITIONS (to expire 11-4-94)
OF APPROVAL: Song-Shyong Hsu of KOK Investment Co., requests aone-
ar retroactNe extension of time to comply with condftions of approval for
ye
Condtional Use Permit No. 3460 (to permit a 4-unk, 3,200-square foot
expansion to an existing commercial retail center) to expire on November 4,
1994. Property is located at 2656 W. la Paima Avenua.
I. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 3206 - REQUEST FOR TERMINATION:
206 FO vic~s~Nerminated
( Y 1
K-Mart Corporetion requests termination of .cndftlonal Use Permit No. 3
(to permit a commercial retail center}. Property is located at 1001-1100
Pullman Street.
J. T~ CONSIDER PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO TITLES 4 "BUSINESS Recommended adoption
REGULATION AND 18'20NING' PERTAINING TO AMUSEMENT DEVICE to the City Council
ARCADES: Requested by Planning Department Staff.
11/01/93
Page 16
K REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION RECEIPT OF PROPOSED ReceNed the proposed
• REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL Redevelopment Plan
~ REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA: Requested by Anahelm
Redevelopment staff.
L REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION RECEIPT OF PROPOSED ReceNed the proposed
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE BROOKHURST COM~~ERCIAL Redevelopment Plan
~QRRIDOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA: Requested by Anaheim
Redevelopment staff. I
J.DJOURNMENT: 3:30 P.M.
11/01/93
Page 17
L
i
,~