Loading...
Minutes-PC 1996/02/21SUMMARY ACTION AGENDA REGULAR MEETING OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 21, 1996 11:00 A.M. PRELIMINARY PLAN REVIEW 1:30 P.M. PUBLIC HEARINGS BEGIN (PUBLIC TESTIMONY) BOSiVVICK BOYDSTUN, BFiISTOI, FIFJdMNG~. t~IAYER, MGSSE AND Pf3iAZA COMMISSIONERS PRESFJQI': NONE COMMISSIONERS ABSETff: STAFF PRESENT: Selma Mann Greg Hastings Cheryl Flores Mary McGoskey Sean Gerber Bruce Freeman Alfred Yalda Tom Engle Margarita Solorio fly Fernandes Deputy City Attorney Zoning Division Manager Associate Planner Deputy Planning Director Assocate Planner Code Enforcement Supervisor Principal Transportation Planner vice Detail Senior Secretary Senior Word Processing Operator pROCEpl1RE TO EXPEDITE pUWNING COMMRSSION PUBIJC HEARINGS 1. The proponents In applicatinns which are not contested will have Live minutes to present their evidence. Additional time will be granted upon request if, in the opinion of the Commission, such additional time will produa+ evidence important to the Commission's consideration. 2. In contested applications, the proponents and opponent will each be given ten minutes to present their case unless deterimined by thelength of time a participlanl speaks, but tithe by whatlis said. mission's considerations are not 3. Staff Reports are part of the evidence deemed received by the Commission in each hearing. Copies are available to the public prior to the meeting. 4. The Commission will withhold questions until the public hearing is dosed. 5. The Commission reserves the right to deviate from the foregoing ff, in its opinion, the ends of fairness to all concerned will be served. 5, AIi documents presented to the Planning Commission fay review in connection with any hearing, Including photographs or other axeptabte visual representations or non~documentary evidenco, shall be retained by the Commission for the public record and shall be available for public Inspections. ~ within the Jurisdictioneof the Planning Commission, and/oriagenida kemoaw. Each speaker wail be alliotted a mhaximum of five (5) minutes to speak. MIgg02~1.WP 02-21-96 Page 1 nueucnu riTV pr eNNING COMMISSION - SUMMARY ACTION AGENDA FEBRUARY 21, 1996 1. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO 268 (PREVIOUSLY-CERTIFIED? A a Determined that . . CONDITIONAL USE PERMIY NO 2713 -REQUEST FOR A RETROACTIVE b EIR 2681s not . EXTENSION OF TIME TO COMPLY WITH CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: adequate to serve as the Louis Drapac, 201 E. Sandpolnte, Suite 450, Santa Ana, CA 92707-5750, requests a retroactive extension of time to expire December 17, 196 for ernironmental Conditional Use Permit No. 2713 (to permit a commercial office complex with documentation waiver of minimum number of parking spaces, maximum structural height and for subject minimum landscaped setback). This petftlon was originally approved by the request and, City Council on December 17, 1985 following Planning Commission approval. further, denied Property is located at the northwest comer of State College Boulevard and Orangewood Avenue. extension of time Continued from the January 8 and 22, 1996 Planning Commission meetings. A TI N: Commissioner Henninger offered a motion, seconded by Commissioner Messe and MOTION CARRIED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby determine that the previously certified EIR 268 Is not adequate to serve as the environmental documentation for this time extension request. Commissioner Henninger offered a motion, seconded by Commissioner Messe and MOTION CARRIED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby deny the request for an extension of time for Condftional Use Permit No. 2713 on the basis that a "good cause" was not shown. The item was trailed until after the last item on the agenda. Cheryl Flores, Associate Planner. Slated staff contacted the applicant yesterday, and the applicant requested the staff report be faxed to him, which they did. Staff Just tried contacting the applicant, but was unable to reach him. Commissioner Messe stated they now have tiro choices, they could either continue or take action on the item. Mary McCloskey, Deputy Planning Director. She explained the item has been continued twice in order for the petitioner to meet with staff. Staff did have a meeting with the petiticner where approximately an hour was spent in discussing the project and it was explained to the applicant why staff was requesting doniai of the subject request. She stated the petitioner clearly understands the sftuation. G2-21-96 Page 2 erueHE~1u CITY PLANNING COMMISSION - SUMMARY ACTION AGENDA FEBRUARY 21, 1996 B. a. CEOA EXEMPTION SECTION 15061 (b1131 b. CODE AMENDMENT N0.9~ - City-Initiated, City of Anaheim, Planning Department, 200 S. Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, CA 92803 requests an amendment to Chapter 18.06 (Vehicle Parking and Loading Requirements) of Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to parking for self-storage facilities. ACTION: Commissioner Henninger offered a motion, seconded by Commissioner Boydstun and MOTION CARRIED that Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby concur with staff that subject request is exempt ftom CEQA. Concurred w/staff Recommended adoption of the ordinance to the City Council, as amended Commissioner Henninger offered a motion, secc:~::gd by Commissioner Peraza and MOTION CARRIED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council the adoption of the proposod ordinance with the following added language to subsection .028 (before the period and after the word "number"): "~ ~ ~s adequate loading and unloading areas, as required by the City Traffic and Transportation Manage' 02-21-96 Page 3 ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION - SUMMARY ACTION AGENDA FEBRUARY 21, 1996 -% C. a. CEQA NEGATIVE DECLARATION (PREVIOUSLY APPROVED) Approved b. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 3898 -REQUEST FORA PP RETROACTIVE EXTENSION OF TIME TO COMPLY WITH ~o expire 7-25-96) CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: A & S ENGINEERING CO., 207 W. Alameda, #203, Burbank, CA 91502 requests a retroactive extension of time to expire July 24, 1996 for Conditional Use Permft No. 3698 (to permit a service station with carwash and convenience market facilities). This petition was originally approved on July 25, 1994 by the Planning Commission. Property is located at 1200 N. Eudid Street. A~"~:'~': Commissioner Messe offered a motion, seconded by Commissioner Henninger and MOTION CAR?!ED, that the Anaheim Planning Commission has reviewed the proposal an!f does hereby find that the Negative Declaration previously approved in connection with Conditional Use Permit No. 3698 is adequate to serve as the required environmental documentation in connection with this request upon finding that the declaration reflects the independent judgement of the lead agency and that it has considered the previously approved Negative Declaration together with any comments received during the pubUc review process and further finding on the basis of the initial study and any comments received that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a signffica~~t effect on the environment. Commissioner Messe offered a motion, seconded by Co:ri;nis~(oner `v Henninger and MOTION CARRIED, that the Anaheim Planning Commission does hereby approve a one (1) year retroactive time extension for Conditional Use Permit No. 3698 (to expire on July 25, 1996), based on the following: (a) The proposed service station with car wash facility is an authorized use subject to the approval of a conditional use permit. (b) There have been no new code amendments which pertain to the development of the subject property. (c) That the petitioner has complied with all conditions of approval to be met "prior to the issuance of building permts'. (d) That tl~e requested extension of time will allow for the petitioner to obtain building permits to develop the subject property as previously approved by the Planning Commission. Commissioner Messe asked if the applicant is in the process of pulling their building permits? Juan Sandival, A & S Engineering, he responded 'yes", however, they might have to go through plan check again because the plan has expired and the code has changed. 02-21-96 Page 4 t ~.. ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION - SUMMP;AY ACTION AGENDA FEBRUARY 21, 1996 Selma Mann, Deputy City Attomey. She asked the Commission to make a determination relatNe to the finding that the negative declarilon that was previously approved for the project is adequate to serve as the environmental documentation for the time extension. The Planning Commission approved, the subject request in conjunction with the wording made by Deputy City Attorney Selma Mann. D. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 3149 REQUEST FOR TERMINATION: Terminated Morcos Khalil, 10830 Firestone Boulevard, Norwalk, CA 90654 requests termination of Conditional Use Permit No. 3149 (to pennk a self-serve gas station with a convenience market). Property is located 2791 East Lincoln Avenue. TERMINATION RESOLUTION N0. PC98.20 E. a. CEQA EXEMPTION SECTION 15061 (b)_131 Concurred w/staff b. CODE AMENDMENT N0.96-03 - Barbara Ward (representing Lucy Recommended Kim, property owner of 715 South Harbor Boulevard) requests an adoption of the '~-- amendment to various sections of Chapters 18.41, 18.44, 18.45 and C i Council the 18.46 of Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to kY reconstruction of single family residences and home occupation registrations in commercial zones. Greg Hastings, Zoning DNision Manager. He referred to a letter dated November 22, 1995, submitted to the Planning Commission and City Council from Barbara Ward. He noted if the subject request is approved ft would allow home occupations in commercial zones where they have single-family residences. Also, R would allow reconstruction of a single-family home in a commercial zone within a period of two Years from the destruction of the single-family home. F. a. CEQA EXEMPTION SECTION 15081 (bl_(31 Continued to b CODE AMENDMENT NO.98-04 -City Initiated, City of Anahelm, 3-4-96 Planning Department, 200 S. Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, CA 92803 requests amendments to Chapter 18.03 (Zoning Procedures) and Chapter 18.93 (Specific Plans) of Tfde 18 of the Ana ~c P annicfpa! Code pertaining to General Plan Amendments, Spec Amendments, and Specific Plan Adjustments. 02-21-96 Page 5 FEBRUARY ?,1, 1996 ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION - SUMMARY ACTION AGENDA ~, G, ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORr un a~a ~PRE1/-CERTLFIED APP~~ FINAL SITE PLAN REVIEW NO.95-4~ JWDA Architects, C/0 Wenna Approved Chen, 430 S. Garfield Avenue, Ste. 400, Alhambra, CA 91801, request review and approval of final site plan, floor plans, elevation plans, and landscape plans to construct a new 5-story, 74 room hotel. Property is located at 505 West Katella Avenue. information needed for the subject Mary McCloskey, Deputy Planning Director. She stated the necessary item has been included in the staff o~ ~Ve allobeen satisfied. theaeforems~he believes no~other issues would with prior to the final she plan app need to be addressed at this time. Commissioner Mtal documtentationClsoin cosnfonmiance ithffhe specific plane plans and are In agreement that the environmen t 02-21-96 Page 6 ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSIO'+ - SUMMARY ACTION AGENDA FEBRUARY 21, 1986 ~; 2a. CECiA NEGATIVE DECLARATION (PREVIOUSLY APPROVED) C~nti~nued to 2b. CONDITIONAL t)zSE PERMIT p10.3731 (READVERTISED) OWNER: DONG S. IaM, 969 La Paz Rd., Placentia, CA 92670 AGENT: JUAN B. CARBAJAL, 1652 W. Lincoln Ave., Anaheim, CA 92805 LOCATION: 1652 West Uncoln Avenue (EI Oio De Actual. Property is approximately 1.3 acres located on the south side of Lincoln Avenue and approximately 440 feet east of the centerline of Eucl(d Street. Petitioner requests deletion or modification of a condition of approval pertaining to a time limitation to retain the on-premise sale and consumption of alcoholic beverage within a restaurant. Continued from the January 8, 1996 Planning Commission meeting. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION N0. _ _ FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. OPPOSITION: None The applicant was not present. Commissioner Henninger stated ft is staff' innate documents.e the ftem until March 4, 1996, which would allow time for the applicant to submit app op ACTION: Continued subject request to the March 4, 1996 Planrn.~g Commission meeting in order for the applicant to submit documentation pertaining to gross quarterly sales of food and alcohd, and for the applicant to attend the public hearing. VOTE: 7-0 02-21-96 Page 7 ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION - SUMMARY ACTION AGENDA FEBRUARY 21, 1996 l_ 3a. CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION Continued to 3b. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0.3812 3-96 OWNER: T.W. IrnestmeM Corp; I. S. Investment Corp; Max Cukier & Miriam Cukier, Trustees Cukier Family Trust; KNa Idetzel, Trustee fdetzel, Inervivos Trusts, C/0 KAPE PROPERTIES, P.O. BOX 6474, Beverly Hills, CA 90212 AGENT: M.B. TECHNICAL SERVICES, Attn: Michael Bates, 1539 W. Spring Street, Long Beach, CA 90810 LOCATION: t325-1341 North Blue Gum Street. Property :,, approximately 9.7 acres located at the northwest comer of Miraloma Avenue and Blue Gum Street. To permit an sutomot'Ne van conversion and modification facility in an existing industrial business park. Continued from the January 22, 1996 Planning Commission meeting. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION N0. '`'" FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. OPPOSITION: None ACTION: Continued subject request to the March 4, 1996 Planning Commission meeting in order to give staff ample opportunity to review the revised submitted plans. VOTE: 7-0 02-21-96 Page 8 FEBRUARY 21, 1996 ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION - SUMMARY ACTION AGENDA Approved qa. ^En,A NEGATIVE DEr-ORATION Granted for 1 year 4b. coNDITIONAL r~SE PERMIT N0.38~ ((o expire 2-21-97) OWNER: ARION INC., C/0 MARTA AIJCIA SPAMPIUATO, 20690 Via Augusto, Yorba Linda, CA 92687 AGENT: FRED GOODWIN, 920 E. Arlee Place, Anaheim, CA 92805 LOCATION: 920.922 East Arlee Place. Property is approximately 0.38 u i~telatgU feet west of the ceM ~e ~ce~a~ app Y Street. To retain an automobile body work and repair facility. Continued from the February 5, 1996 Planning Commission meeting. pC96-21 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION NO. ~- FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. OPPOSITION: None APPLICANT'S STATEMENT: Fred Goodwin, 920-922 E. Arlee Place. He stated he is repr He eixpialned the facility will not be requesting a condftional use permit for a body repair shop. available to the general public and that automobiles will be picked up ftom dealerships or vehicle intin at the subject facility. wholesalers. He stated there will be no pa 9 He noted a reciprocal eas was filed in 19781 which alirnnr she bulildfngileast of them to uti~e 15tfeet of easement that na~v axis workin on the reciprocal easement. their lot. He explained that their lavryer is currently 9 He stated after they purchased the building they discovered the west portion of the building which appears to be a room location and ft never had a building permit, therefore, they need to proceed with obtaining a building permit and/or to check with staff ff it meets code. He stated he doesn't feel they will be able to comply within the 90-day period relatNe to the conditions in the staff report. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. 02-21-96 Page 9 ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION - SUMMARY ACTION AGENDA FEBRUARY 21, 1896 ~-- STAFF'S COMMENTS: Commissioner Messe referred to Condition No. 4 in the staff report and asked Mr. Goodwin ff he read the condition. Fred Goodwin stated yes', but they didn't qufte understand the wording. He stated he assumed ft meant a review of the item and then a renewal. Commissioner Messe asked staff why Condition No. 4 was recommended for a year'? Cheryl Flores, Associate Planner. She stated they were concerned about the outdoor storage and staff would like to re-evaluate ff in a year. At that time, the subject use could be readvertlsed to modify or delete the condition of approval. Fred Goodwin stated he has a concern with Condition No. 6 pertaining to the perimeter chainlink fencing. He indicated on the west skis perimeter the auto parts warehouse property has installed a modem barb-wire device on top of their wall. The barb-wire would have to be removed, temporarily, (n order for them to install the requested screening material on the west sloe perimeter. Commissioner Boydstun asked ff the west side could be exduded since it backs up to a supply yard and is not on a public street where it can be seen? Cheryl Flores stated she doesn't believe the area is visible ftorr~ the street, but the code states the storage must be screened ftom view. Commissioner Boydstun asked for clarification ff the west skis is visible from the street? Fred Goodwin responded the west side is a very large parking lot for their facility, but not too many cars utilize the parking lot. Commissioner Boydstun suggested to install a net screening (green vinyl tarp) in the west side area which would obstruct the view. Fred Goodwin stated they do not have any objection. Cheryl Flores indicated it has been an acceptable screening method in the past. Commissioner Boydstun spoke relative to Condition No. 4 and asked ff ft's necessary for the applicant to apply for a conditional use permit, again, could the subject use come back for a one-year review? Selma Mann stated 'ft is deliberately worded this way in situations where staff and/or the Commission wishes to have another look at a business. If a one-year review is made, ft completely shifts the burden of proof around so that the burden is upon the City to proof a case." Commissioner Boydstun asked ff the applicant would need to pay, again, for a condftional use permit? Cheryl Flores responded at that time a fee would not be irndved, but staff would re-evaluate the initial study. 02-21-96 Page 10 ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION - SUMMARY ACTION AGENDA FEBRUARY 21, 1896 Commissioner Messe asked for clarffication relative to the condtional use permit fee being charged again. Cheryl Flores responded $3301s the current fee for a conditional use permit, and that fee would not be charged at the re-evaluation of the initial study. Commissioner Peraza commented he understands the applicant has indicated that there would be no painting services at the subject facility, but he would suggest a condition be added stating that "in case painting services are provided that the applicant would need to conform wfth Air Quality Management District (AOMD).' Commissioner Henninger suggested the added condftion to read "in case painting services are provided, that the applicant would conform with all of the regulations pertaining to paint booths'. Fred Goodwin stated they are aware of the regulations they would have to comply with and he stated they have no objection to the added condition. Commissioner Bostwick asked the applicant ff he would like Condtion No.1 to be extended to 120 days. Fred Goodwin responded yes'. ACTION: Approved Negative Declaration Granted Conditional Use Permit No. 3818, for one year, with the following changes to conditions: ^`'~ Modffied Condtion fdos. 1, 6, 7 and 9 to read as follows: 1. That building permits shall be obtained for the existing metal canopy enclosure ac 920 East Arlee Place within one hundred twenty (120) days from the date of this resolution or the unpemtitted canopy enclosure shall be removed. 6. That the petitioner shall utilize and maintain in good conditlon, redwood cedar or PVC slats on the north, east and south perimeter chainlink fencing. The west skis perimeter chainlink fencing shall be fully screened with poly vinyl material. 7. That Condition Nos. 3 and 6above-mentioned, shall be completed wthin a period of ninety (90) days from the date of this resolution. 9. That Condition Nos. land Sabove-mentioned, shall be completed within a period of one hundred twenty (120) days ftom the date of this resolution. Added the following condition: That in the event painting services are provided at subject facility, they shall fully comply with all regulations pertaining to paint booths. VOTE: 7-0 Selma Mann, Deputy City Attorney, presented the 22-day appeal rights. ~_ 02-21-96 Page 11 ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION - SUMMARY ACTION AGENDA FEBRUARY 21, 1996 ~- ~ Approved 5a. CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION Approved 5b. WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT Granted 5c. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0.3821 OWNER: ~ DMANFAND WALTER A. FRIEDMANDEtit10 W BKatella Avenue, Orange, CA 92667 AGENT: DAVID AMESTOY, 1125 E. Whfting Avenue, Fullerton, CA 92631 LOCATION: 2801 East Uncoln Avenue (Del Tacol. Property is approximately 0.36 acres located at the northeast comer of Lincoln Avenue and Rio Vista Street. To permft a 610-square foot outdoor dining area in conjunction wfth an existing drive-through restaurant wfth waiver of minimum number of parking spaces. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION N0. PC96-22 FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. .~ OPPOSITION: None APPLICANT'S STATEMENT: Dave Amestoy, Archftect, 1125 E. Whfting Avenue, Fullerton. Stated he is the representative for the tenant (Del Taco) of the subject facility. He indicated they are requesting addftional seating to be installed in an existing patio area. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. STAFF'S COMMENTS: Commissioner Bristol asked if there has been any activfty reported fn the last 12 months. Investigator Tom Engle, Vice Detail, Police Department. He responded "yes', and explained the activities reported have occurred from January 19, 1995 to present. He stated there have been twenty-stx (26) reported calls for service at the subject location: 1. Ten (10) disturba:~ce of peace and fighting 2. A person with a firearm 3. A malicious mischief 4. Suspicious person 02-21-96 Page 12 eunuoi~~ e~TV DI ANNING COMMISSION - SUMMARY ACTION AGENDA FEBRUARY 21, 1996 5. Drunk in public 6. A Code Enforcement incident 7. Eleven (11) abandoned vehicles on the property Commissioner Masse Indicated ff the eleven (11) abandoned vehicle calls were eliminated, there would then be fffteen (15) reported calls for service. He asked for clarification relative to the time period of the calls. Investigator Tom Engle responded the calls received are En an approximate one-year period. Commissioner Bristol asked Mr. Amestoy 'rf he fs aware of the hours of operation at the subject facility. Mr. Amestoy responded he believes it is a 24hour operation. Commissioner Boydstun asked ff the police report stages what time of day the calls were -ecefved? Investigator Tom Engle responded the calls received are at all hours of the day, but most of the calls are in early morning. The disturbance calls appear to be at 1:00 a.m. - 3:00 a.m. Commissioner Masse asked what staffing is availabl$ at 1:00 a.m. - 5:00 a.m. Mr. Amestoy responded "ha is the architect for the project and he is not very familiar with the entire staffing of the subject operation." '.,~~ Commissioner Bristol asked ffwalk-in customers are attended to after 12:00 p.m., or is it strictly drive-through? Mr. Amestoy stated, he believes, the subject facility is open 24 hours for walk-in and drive-through customers. Commissioner Bodystun suggested that the item be continued for the applicant to provide additional information relative to the operation of the facility and she indicated a security guard may be needed. Commissioner Henninger suggested a condition be added stating that 'the applicant will provide one licensed securely guard ff deemed necessary by the Anaheim Police Department. Further discussion took place between staff and Commissioners relative to the procedures that need to be taken after the Planning Commission recommends for the Pdice Department to determine the amount of security guards needed at a location. ACTION: Approved Negative Declaration Approved Waiver of Code Requirement Granted Conditional Use Permit No. 3821 with the fdlowing added conditions: That within a period of ninety (90) days or prior to use of the outdoor dining area, whichever occurs first, the petitioner shall meet wfth the Anaheim Pdice Department to determine the need for a private security guard at subject facility. 02-21-96 Page 13 ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION - SUMMARY ACTION AGENDA FEBRUARY 21, 1996 `'-~ ~ A maximum of one licensed security guard shall be provided ff deemed necessary by the Anaheim Police Department. The Planning Commission requested to be informed regarding the outcome of the security guard recommendation of the Anaheim Pdice Department for subject facility. VOTE: 7-0 Selma Mann, Deputy City Attorney, presented the 22-day appeal rights. 02-21-96 Page 14 ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION - SUMMARY ACTION AGENDA FEBRUARY 21, 1996 Approved 6a. CE(r1AA NEGATIVE DECLARATION Approvedi 6b. WAIVER OF CODE RECUIREMLNT Granted 6c. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0.3822 OWNER: MARC ANANN HALL!GANES6937 A enkJa De Santiago, Anaheim, CA 92807 ~ AGENT: RICHARD L ANDERSON, 128 S. Glassell Avenue, Orange, CA 92666 LOCATION: 5799E La Palma Avenue. Property is approximately 9.9 acres located north and east of the northeast comer of Imperial Highway and La Palma Avenue. To permit the conversion of an approximate 6,000-square foot building to adrive-through restaurant with waiver of minimum number of parking spaces. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION N0. PC9Ei-23 FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. OPPOSITION: None APPLICANTS STATEMENT: Rick Anderson, 128 S. Glassell Avenue, Orange. He stated they are proposing a Burger King Restaurant in an existing facility. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. STAFF'S COMMENTS: Commissioner Henninger re~erred to the plans and asked ff amen ~amerrts will be made to the planter areas? drivethrough lanetandha a proposingsto enhanceffthe outside median st perwith tai~osving the Commissioner Messe referred to the plans pertaining to the dfireway entrance ftom La Palma Avenue and he asked ff a portion of the landscape area is being eliminated? 02-21-96 Page 15 ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION - SUMMARY ACTION AGENDA FEBRUARY 21, 1996 ~- •I Rick Anderson responded 'yes', they will be eliminating a small portion of landscaping so they could accommodate a couple of parking spaces and to keep within the requirements of allowing back-up space for the drive-through lane. Commissioner Messe noted if they will also be cutting into the landscape area to get doser 6,' La Palma Avenue•thei landsca~osetback area t also be modfBed? Rick Anderson stated tt eretaee are proposing for Pe a couple of spaces that do encroach into the existing landscape area. Commissioner Henninger stated he believes staff was unaware of the landscape setback area being modified, therefore, he indicated a waiver may have to be advertised. Commissioner Henninger asked staff ff the spaces do encroach into the required landscape setback? Greg Hastings, Zoning Division Manager. Stated there is a 14-foot required landscape setback, but in the past'he street was widened and he believes currently the setback is not even 14 feet. Therefore, the existing landscaping could not be reduced down ftom iGs present wkith without a landscape waiver. Commissioner Henninger asked staff if the parking spaces need to be moved to provide back-up space for the drive-through lane? Alfred Yalda, Principal Transportation Planner. He concurred with Mr. Anderson's comments relative to making the necessary changes in keeping within the requiremonts. Further discussion followed between staff and Commissioners relative to the parking and landscaping issue in accommodating for the back-up space. Rick Anderson stated they concur with all conditions, except for Cond~ooeS ~~a elan employeeing a unfformed security guard. He explained that Burger King Compa y every hour to check the premises. Planning Commissioners agreed to change the wording in Condition No. 8, adding "that a uniformed security guard shall be provided if deemed necessary by the Anaheim Pdice Department. Rick Anderson stated they were in agreement relative to the wording change in Condition No. 8. Cheryl Flores, Associate Planner. She suggested Condition No. 8 to be eliminated ftom Condition No. 12 since a security guard may not be requirsd. Selma Mann, Deputy City Attorney. She asked for a darif(cation to be made on the ftont page of the staff report, under rzauest section, which pertains to the minimum number of parking spaces and she explained the way ft is written is confusing. She also stated it should Indicate the code required parking is 704 spaces. Commissioner Messe stated 418 spaces was a result of the parking study and he agreed the wording is confusing. 02-21-96 Page t E FEBRUARY 21, 1996 ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION - SUIIIIMARY ACTION AGENbA ~~' ACTION: Approved Negative Declaration Approved Waiver of Code Requirement Granted Conditional Use Permit No. 3822 with the fdlowing changes to conditions: Modified Condition Nos. 8 and 9 to read as fellows: 8, That a uniformed security guard shall be provided to monitor the premises to discourage loftering ftom dusk to dosing as directed by the Anaheim Police Department. g, That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the petitioner and which plans are on file wfth the Planning Department mark F~°itthe Nos. 1, 2 and 3; Prosetback alongerLa Palma Avenue shal/fbe eliminated. required landscape VOTE: 7-0 Selma Mann, Deputy City Attorney, presented the 22-day appeal rights. 02-21-96 Page 17 ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION - SUMMARY ACTION AGENDA FEBRUARY 21, 1996 rncrucst9N ITEM: CONTINUATION OF A DISCUSSION RELATIVE TO "GOOGIE ~uncil that "googie s gns' SIGNS' LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY OF ANAHEIF.7. located within the City of Anaheim be properly documented Into the historical archNes Commissioner Henninger stated the sub-committee recommends that the 'googie signs" that are being removed within the City of Anaheim to be documented and he asked if Bret Cdscn, Anaheim Public Information Manager, has the ability to do the documentation. Mary McCloskey, Deputy Planning Director. She Informed the Commission that Bret Colson has the ability to take pictures as a base photography, but not to do a full documentation as far as the history or verbal text. Commissioner Henninger indicated there are not too many "googie signs' and he stated with Bret Colson's offer and in conjunction with additional time made by the Planning Department that he feels the documentation could be made in a reasonable way, for a very minor cost. Chairwoman Mayer stated through the course of putting in new signs could the submitted9o staffnt made that if there's background information available on the oid signs that a copy J Mary McCloskey stated most of the property owners staff has worked with in the resort area do have pictures from when the signs have changed. They don't have all the historical signs, but the owners who have had the property for 25-30 years have background information and she stated she is certain staff would be able to obtain the necessary copies. She stated she is concerned whim Planning Department staff having the time or the direction to prepare the rdesources that wowed be dev ted ff anything more is required ftomnstaff than Just taking lpicturesning to She noted staff agrees that the documentation of the "googie signs" is the right thing to do, but staff is not sure who would be responsible to do the documentation. Commissioner Henninger indicated there were not too many "googie signs" in the CR Zrme area, and in his woluld be involved in documenting Itmae signs. Heeasked that aeecommendation be made to do theft documentation. Mary McCloskey asked ff he is referring to the Anaheim Resort "googie signs' or all the "googie signs` in the City? Commissioner Henninger responded he is referring to the Anaheim Resort "googie signs' that the City is responsible for taking down due to the sign upgrade program. 02-21-96 Page 18 ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION - SUMMARY ACTION AGENDA FEBRUARY 21, 1896 `-- Commissioner Messe asked ff he had any intentions relative to the rest of the 'googie signs' ? Commissioner Henninger stated he would Uke to see the other'goog!e signs' Photographed and documented, but the extensive documentation should be made to the'googie signs' the City is responsible for removing. irrformation~ but did no haveithe staffsources avai able in orcie~r t doathe researche~ffory ~ the Chairwoman Mayer stated it is important to have the proper documentation go Into historical archives at the the research and that ma/yrbe the p oper avenue but they would need the~esources, t~hlerefgore, she feelsda recommendation should be made to Clty Council. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 2:25 P.M., TO THE REGULARLY SCHEDULED PLANNING COMMISSION MORNING WORK SESSION OF MARCH 4, 1996 AT 11:00 A.M. Respectfully submitted, ~~~~ G~1~ EII Ferran es, Senior Word Processing Operator Y Planning Department 02-21-96 Page 19 1 Y t ~~. ff. _, .,