Minutes-PC 1996/04/01~~
SUMMARY ACTION AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING OF THE ANAHE@M CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
MONDAY, APRIL 1, 1996
'~
11:00 A.M. WORKSHOP PERTAINING 0 FINDINGS
~ 1;30 p,M. PUBLIC HEFuRiNGS BEGIN (PUBLIC TESTIMONY)
a~ per; eosrwlCf~ eoYDSTUN, r3wsTd.. ffeaNtac>~, A~ESSE. ~~-
COMMISSIOt~iS ABSBdr: fiMYER
STAFF ppESgQT: Selma Mann
Grog Hastings
Cheryl Flores
Deus Hemck
Sean Gerber
Alfred Yalda
Natalie Meeks
Edith Harris
Margarita Sfllorio
Elly Fernandes
Deputy ^,ity Attorney
Zoning Manager
Associate Planner
Aasodate Planner
Aasodate planner
fkindpal Transportation Planner
Civil Engineer
Planning Commission Support Supervisor
Senior Secretary
Senior Wont Processing Operator
PROCEDURE TO D~f TE PI.AG ~ ~~ HEAf~N(~
1. time will ben granted ppontirequest if, ii the opi~nioneof the ICommisafan, such addiptional tlmeiwill~produce evidence
important to the Commission's consideration.
2. In contested applications, the proponents and opponent will each be gPren ten minutes to present their case unless
additional time is requested and the complexity of aka, but rathe~what is sold. mission's considerations are not
determined by the length of time a partidpant spe Y
3, Staff Reports are part of the evidence deemed received by the Con~misslon in each hearing. Copies are available to
the public prior to the meeting.
4. The Commission will withho{d questions until the public hearing is dosed.
5. The Commission roserves the right to deviate from the foregoing h, in its opinion, the ends of fairness to all concerned
will be served.
6, c I docu aa~ptable vlaualtreprosentationso non~ocumentary evidece shall be retained by the Commission for theh,~
public record and shall be available for public inspections.
7. within the J~isdi son ofuthe Manning Commisalon, aned/oblagendaeftsmos~Each epeaksr will be allotted a mezimurn of
five (5) minutes to speak.
MIf160M1O1.WP
04-01-96
Page 1
APRIL 1, 1996
~ ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION - SUMMARY ACTION AGENDA
,\
1. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS:
A. a. ~E(iA EXEMPTION SECTION 15061 Ib1 (3)
t+. rODE AMENDMENT NO„~¢9~ -City Initiated, City of
Anaheim, Planning Department, 200 S. Anaheim Boulevard,
Anaheim, CA 9803. Request to amend Chapters 18.04,
18.21, 18.22, 18.23, 18.24, 18.25, 18.28, 18.27, 18.31, 18.32,
18.34 and 18.35 of Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code
pertaining to a new procedure for registration of Large Family
Day Care Homes.
A I Commissioner Henninger offered a motion, seconded by
Commissioner Peraza (Chairwoman Mayer absens) and MOTION
CARRIED that tha Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby
accept staffs dete:minatipn ~totne poroject i~ which have the
general rule that CEQA appl Y P I
potential for causing a significant effect on the environment.
f;ornmissioner Henninger offered a motion, seco~ tehatthe
Commissioner Peraza (Chai-woman Mayer abse )
Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby recommend to
the City CoancN the adoption of the draft ordinance attached to
staff report dated AprN 1, 1996•
Planning Commission requested that the fdlowing changes be
made to the Large Family Day Care Home (LFDCH) F9gistratbn
form:
A. Add property owner's name; and
B. Modify Subseetbn .080 to read as fellows:
.080 The applicant shall obtain a City business license for a
Largo Family Day Care Home, sl~~all provide a ropy of
the State of Calffomia Day Care license to the City
Planning Department and s'~.ali register said home with
the City Planning Department on this form as approved
by the City of Anaheim Planning Cammisslcn.
Concurred w/staff
Recommended
adoption of the
draft orlina.~ce to
the City CouncN
Delia Her, ick, Assistant Planner. She referred to the staff report and seated t~ proposes woe
Amendment is for Large Famiy Day Care Home(s) (EPOCH). She stated the current process for a
iFDCH is that they regr,;,-o the applicar>< to apply for a permit, f~'owing the request staff will maN
letters to people within 300 felt of the property. The letter Informs people tf they find ore (1) of six
(li) different things that they can then oppose the requested LFDCH.
X4-01-96
Page 2
ANAHEI:IA CITY PLANNING COMMISSION - SUMMARY ACTION AGENDA
APRIL 1, 1996
She stated that many times the LFDCH has already been In le b ythe City. Staff bthen spends a
which people don't realize until they receh-e the notifk~tion
;ot of time going over issues which the City has no jurisdiction over
She stated the puracse of the amendment is to make the rrocess better for large family day care
operators and for City staff. C1nly one (1) form wou o~need to be fil~~ it was indicated by~Code
more information and it would also address many p
Enforcement that they haven't had any complaints on She operation of a L.FDCH.
Verla Miller, representing Large Family Day Care Homes. a ~~H tShehexplained bY~state laws
Enforcement has ever boon out on a complaint regard ng
LFD~H have to have a low profile and cannot have any signs Indicating the subject use on their
property.
She asked about the reference which pertains to 'not having any other sinflar facilities within
~e 22) did requirek600 fee but they~reduced it to 300 feet. She noted the state regulations
R
but staff has discussed it and
Della Herrick responded that 600 feet was ftom an dd ordinance,
recommends it remain 600 feet. She explained that they don't waM day care facilities next door to
~ ulatehthat portion of the regulat on and the statelwouldtnot takte precuedence over he Ck~s to
eg
Ordlrl?.i1Ce.
Chalmian Messe stated he though 600 feet was reasonable because it's a more intense use for
neighbofioods. Commissioner Peraza agreed.
Debbie Goodwin, 1730 S. Stoneman Street, Anaheim, CA 92802• Stated she called other cfties to
find out what their requirements were and she found that Buena Park has no regulation; Garden
Grove has no regu~al~^: Fullerton -300 feet; Brea -300 feet; Irvine - no regulation (conform with
state); and Santa Ana - no regulation (conform with state).
Commissioner Bostwick asked ff the City is silent, would it go back to stare regulations?
Della Herrick responded "yes'.
04-01-96
Page 3
APRIL 1, 1996
~IANAHEtM CITY PLANf!iING COMMISSION - SUMMARY ACTION AGENDA
J
B. a. "DDENDUM TO EIR N0.266 (PREVIOUSLY CERTIFlED) Approved
b. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 2651 -RETROACTIVE APP~~
x t ION OF TIME TO COMPLY WITH CONDITIONS_~F (To expire 2-26-97)
AP R V L: Anaheim Land Associates, 450 Newport Center
DrNe, Suite 304, Newport Beach, CA 92660-7640, requests a
retroacWe extension of time to expire Febniary 26,1997 for
Conditional Use Permit No. 2651 (to perrnft an 11-story, 128
foot high hotel with on-sale alcoholic beverages and acx;essory
uses and a 12 and 15-story, 182 foot and 220 foot, 6 inch high
commercial office complex). This petition was originally
approved on Febniary 26, 1985• Property is located at 2400 E.
Katella Avenue.
ACTION: Commissioner Henninger offered a motion,
seconded by Commissioner Boydstun (Chairwoman Mayer
absent) and MOTION CARRIED that the ~ dog hereby fln.~i g
Commission has reviewed the proposal
that the previously certified Addendum to EIR No. 266 is
adequate to serve as the required environmental
documentation for CondRbnal Use Permit No. 2651.
Commissioner Henninger offered a motion, seconded by
Commissioner Bristd (Chaiwoman Mayer absent) and
MOTION CARRIED that the Anaheim City Planning
Commission does hereby approve aone-year extension of
time (to expire February 26, 1997) for Conditional Use Permit
No. 2651 subject to the fdlowing provisions:
(a) That all new parking spaces shall comply with the
minimum parking space dimension requirements in effect
on the date of building permit issuance.
(b) That tio^; ten (10) or feWe ~contia eas shallkbe separated
located in the new open pa g
by a minimum forty eight (48) square foot landscaped
planter, having a minimum five (5) foot dimensions and
containing at least one (1) tree per planter.
(c) That all roof-mounted equipment, ground-mounted
antennas and mechanicalJutiliry equipment are required
to be screened per Ordinance No. 5391 adopted on
October 12, 1993.
04-01-96
Page 4
APRIL 1, 1996
ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION - SUMMARY ACTION AGENDA
~_ ~.
rONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 1978 -PLANNING I Grarded
C.
COMMISSION SECRETARY REQUESTS NUNC PRO TUNC ~
RESOLUTION: Request, due to derkx~l error to correct the
meeting is located at 4426 So~ut Beach Boulevard (paclfl~c lnn
Property
Motel).
NUNC PRO TUNC RESOLUTION N0. PC~-
04-01-96
Page 5
APRIL 1, 1996
( ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION - $IUMMARY ACTION AGENDA
\_
2a. CFOA NEGATIVE DECLARAT1QN
2b WAIVER OF ~nnF aFnUiREMENT
2c. COONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0.3616 (READVERTI5ED)
OWNER: ROBERT DALE ZANTOS & ANITA MARIE ZANTOS,
3100 E. Coronado St., Anaheim, CA 92806
AGENT: MARTIN FRAZIER, 2100 Southeast Main Street #100,
Irvine, CA 92714
LOCATION: 1190 North Kraemer Boulevard. Property is
approximately 1.94 acres located at the southeast comer
of Coronado Street and Kraemer Boulevard, hav(ng
approximate frontages of 310 feet on the south side of
Coronado Street and 215 feet on the east side of Kraemer
Boulevard.
To pemtit accessory service and outdoor display of marine vehicles and
to construct a 2,100 square foot mezzanine in conjunction with a
previously approved marine vehicle manufacturing and retail sales facility
wfth waNer of permitted encroachments Into a required setback area.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION N0. pC9f~33
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION.
OPPOSITION: None
OWNER'S STATEMENT:
Approved
Approved
Approved request,
as readvertised,
for 2 years
(To expire 41-98)
Bob Zantos, 3100 E. Coronado Street, Anaheim. He explained that three (3) years ago they
bought property at 1190 N. Kraemer Boulevard which they have since rehabNitated. The subject
request is for a condftionel use permft to service ~ for~sen-icing water raft vehicles. ~e~ He
explained that the space would be a temporary
He explained that they can store about sbcteen (16) vehicles in four spaces as the watercrafts are
about 3-1 /2' x 8'. He stated they are planning to move across the street in hopes to resolve the
space Issue.
Mr. Zantos stated people from all over Southern California, including Orange County, have come
to the subject facility to buy personal watercrafts. He explained that the subject business is
generating money for the City, as the average cost for a watercraft veh~doe~lsl a4p~proxlmately
$7,000, Last year, they sdd 300 watercrafts and this year they expect
THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED.
04-Ot-96
Page 6
APRIL 1, 1996
ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION - SUMMARY ACTION AGENDA
~'
STAFF'S COMMENTS:
Cheryl Flores, Associate Planner. Stated ff the subject hem is approved, staff would request to
include Conditions Nos. 1, 2 and 3 from prfor Resdution No. PC9.~-88 thereby having all
corxiftlons pertaining to the subject property under one resolution.
Commissioner Bristd asked for darffication relative to staff s requests regarding
Condition No. 2.
Cheryl Flores, Associate Planner. Stated the conditlon under the prior resolution is for outdoor
display of marine vehides and that the requested space is only for a service area wh~ernet toebye~n
park vehides that are there for service. She stated K is not considered by the appl
outdoor display area.
Chairman Meese stated he was by the she on Saturday and it dkJ not app rfoeclarificatio~t
were parked in the spaces were there for service and he asked the appl
Mr. Zantos stated the vehides parked in the spaces are not there for sale, but for service. He
explained when a new watercraft vehide is sold, the buyer has a free ten (10) hour check-up,
where they can bring the vehide back at a taotebretibme ands n~ Thervehides that are for sale are
Therefore, some of the vehides wUl appea
under the covered area and also are located inskie the facility.
Chairman Mel sstece areatl He asked if the customersecould bring thle veh c es for service
- requested pa 9 Pa
directly to the other skis of the building?
Mr. Zantos responded they have large trucks and forMiKs on the other skis of the binding
in tF~iat areathHe stated he~ ealipzesiit isnt thebperfect sdution but it ids temporary until theye able
to move across the street.
Commissioner Bostwick referred to Item No. 1 on the preceding conditional use permft and asked
ofr'jet skis tthat aret beingtbuil~ for fouir(4) passengers would be described as aed~e new type
Mr. Zantos explained the product 11ne they sell is manufactured by a company who doesn't make
andftwatercraftssand stated,Pnrhis op nionr the wording oathe~proeposedecondiNon s acceptable.
ACTION: Approved Negative Declaration
Approved Waiver of Code Requirement
Approved CUP 3616, as readvertised.
Added the fdlowing conditions from Resolution No. PC93-8f3 in order to have
a complete set of conditions in the newly adopted resolution:
1. That the retak sales activities associated wfth subject use shall be
inckiental to the manufacturing of marine vehide accessories, and the
sale of marine vehides shall be limited to 'Jet ski" type vehides only
and shall ~ include boats.
04-01-96
'Pa'ge 7
ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION - SUMMARY ACTION AGENDA APRIL ~~ ~~
~_..
2. That there shall be no outdoor display of marine vehicles and/or
accessories at any time unless such items are under a roof; and, ff so-
displayed under a roof, not more than two (2) vehicles shall be displayed
unless the Zoning Code is amended to specffically permit othen+vise.
That the storage, use or dispensing of hazardous materials In quantities in
excess of those specffled in Unfform BuUding Code, Tables 9-A and 9B, shall
comply wfth Unfform Fire Code, Article 80.
VOTE: 6-0 (Chairwoman Mayer absent)
DISCUSSION TiME: 12 Minutes
Selma Mann, Deputy City Attorney, presented the 22-day appeal rights.
04-01-96
Page S
APRIL 1, 1996
( ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION - SUMMARY ACTION AGENDA
\__ .
~EQ_e NEGATIVE DECLARATION Approved
3a. ed
3b. WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT ~rant~ed
3c. ,¢QNDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0.3836
OWNER: 3130 MIRALOMA AVENUE, INC., A CALIFORNIA
CORPORATION, c/o Mark R. Poochigian, D.0.
Management, 5000 Birch Street, East, Bugding #510,
Newport Beach, CA 92660
AGENT: MARTIN FRAZIER, 2100 Southeast Main St.•eet #100,
Irvine, CA 92714
LOCATION: Property is approximately 1.5 acres located at the
nortlmeast comer of Coronado Street and Kraemer
Boulevard.
To permit a 22,861 square foot buUding induding a 1,568 square foot
mezzanine for retail sales/service and warehouse storage of marine
vehides, trailers, parts and accessories with outdoor display with waiver
of minimum structural setback and yard requirements.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION N0. PC96-34
FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION.
OPPOSITION: None
APPLICANTS STATEMENT:
Bob Zantos, owner of the subject property. He gave background information relative to the
subJecK business and stated the firm was founded in 1978. They have had several different
locations being Santa Ana, Anaheim, back to SF~nta Ana, and Orange. For the past three (3) years
they've been located in Anaheim, when they moved to Anaheim they had 64 employees and
currently them are 160 employees.
He stated the purpose of the expansion is because they need more manufacturing space, the
customers are demanding more parts per day and their sales have expanded. Also, they need a
larger showroom for Sea Doo West.
Chaimman MAsse asked ff they're going to take parts across Coronado Street?
Mr. Zantos responded they wculd not be shipping parts bacme hafn~dise ~ rts anted i~ a very strnhaell
shipping department is basically for purchase of accessary /Pa
part of their business.
04-01-96
Page 9
APRIL 1, 1996
ANAHEIM CITY pLANNINfa COMMISSION - SUMMARY ACTION AGENDA
~• -
THE PUBLIC : JEARING WAS CLOSED.
STAFF'S COMMENTS:
Gay Forbes, Community Development Department, Economic Development Manager. She stated
the subject business is the type of business they're trying to attract to the City of Anaheim. She
~ to ~ g~ ul be doser. toi$25 million a year than 320 mplkxry bring to the City and she
Pl
Greg Hastings, Zoning Divisbn Manager. He referred to the staff report and indicated staff would
recommend a change to Conditkm Nos. 6 and 7. It Indicates that the saki conditions be in
'Arior~to flnalPnsrpection' because h pertai si to he skewalk and driveway nstalla fon.~ to read
P
Ralph Hastings, Architect. He referred to the staff report, Condi~in Nsotalls foe he to the outdoor
storage area and he darffied that they will be using eight (8) pa 9
outdoor/screened storage of watercrafts, twt the staff report indicates 'a maximum of eight (8)
vehides to be stored'.
Commissioner Messe asked ff he is referring to the property behind the fence? Ralph Hasting
responded "yes'.
Greg Hastings stated he believos K was staffs original Intent to read 'eight (8) parking stalls' and
he agreed with the requested change.
ACTION: Approved Negative Declaration
Approved WaNer of Code Requirement
Granted Conditional llse Permit No. 3838 with the fdlowing changes to
conditions:
Modified Condftion Nos. 2, 6, 23 and 25 to read as fellows:
. That outdoor watercraft display shall be limited to a maximum of
six (6) vehldes ad~acgnt to the main entrance and a maximum of
eight (8) parking stalls for outdoor/screened storage of marine
vehldes along the north building elevation as shown on Exhibit No.
1. Outdoor display or storage of marine vehldes shall not be
permitted in the drop-otf lanes on the south skJe of Building 'B'.
6. That prbr to building and zoning inspections, sidewalk and
driveway approach Improvements shall be constructed per Cfty
Standard.
23. That prkx to issuance of a building perrnft, or within a period of
one (1) year from the date of this resolution, whichever occurs first,
Conditbn Nos. 9, 16, 17, 19, _and 20 above-mentioned, shall be
04-01-96
Page 10
APRIL 1, 1996
ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION - SUMMARY ACTION AGENDA
~~s
complied with. E;ctensions for further time to complete said
conditions may be granted in accordance with Secticn 18.03.080 of
the Anaheim Municipal Code.
25. That prior to final building and zoning inspections, Condition
Nos. 3, 6, 7, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 22 and 24, above-mentioned, shall
be complied with.
VOTE: 6-0 (Chairwoman Mayer absent)
DISCUSSION TIME: 9 Minutes
Selma Mann, Deputy City Attorney, presented the 22-day appeal rights.
MEETING ADJOURNED AT 2:10 P.M., TO MONDAY, APR" 15, 1995 AT 10:30 A.M., FOR A
PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP PERTAINING TO REVIEW OF PLANNING COMMISSION
OPERATIONS AND PROCEDURES
Respectfully submitted,
~~
EII Fernandes, Senior Word Processing Operator
Y
Planning Department
04-01-96
Page 11