PC 1951-1952-6=I~'=,: ' R~SOI~TIO~ ~0.'6-- S~IES 1951-~2
~J~%"f{ ~' ~ ~AS, ~he ~e~ Ci~y Pl~ui~ 0o~ission ~id a~ ~ ~our~ ~e~ar
~ Meet~ on SeD~embor 2~, 19~1~ oo~t a ~%lic Hea~inS sohed~ ~rs~nt to pro-
~:]:: 4 cee~ings in~itut~ ~der a verifie~ potitiou for a Yaria~e, No. 1~1, fil~ Sept.
5 1~, 19~1, by the ~ - 3t. Jo~s, Builders, ~wt~e. 0alifomia, in which it
6 ~az proposal
? ~ ~UI~ ~0T Cv~ 10~ 0R 2~ ~NE3 IN TRA0~ ~0S. 1~28, 1~$29 IED l~l, WITH A
~OTAG~ IN ~%~E ~S 0F 1001 SqU~
8 ~S IN ~IS ~ ~5T CO~I~ NOT ~
9 T~ A~ ~0L~ IS ~E~ BY T~ ~ C~TERY R~NI~G
T~OT NO. 1178 ~ ~0RT~Y FROM STATING ~INT ~ ~%~T SYO~ dT~T~
10 T~OE ~T~,Y ~NG ~ST S~O~ STreET ~ P~CENT~ A~E; T}~NOE
,~NG PLAC~T~ A~ ~ C~T~ LI~ OF ~ A. U. W. C0. ItlGBT-0F-WAY~
:~ 11 T~NO~ WESleY ~ T~ ~OR~T.~U~D~ OF T~CT NO. 1178.
12 W~, sat~ Co.lesion, as a result of'its inspection, inves~igation
1~ stuiies ~s %2 itself ~ in its beh=lf, ~ of testimonie~ offere~
i4 hear~, has established extstance of the followl~
15 1. ~t the ~swers given on the Vari~ce Petition ~ve not been correctly
16 ' '
2. T~t there ~ been ~ ~owi~ of ~hip, .~u~l circ~t~ce~ or
~ 17 ~airness.
18 ~W, ~E~, BE IT ~0LV~ t~t the above Variance No. 1%1 be denied.
19 ~ ~G ~OLUTIO~ was appr~ve~ b~ the A~eim City Pl~ni~ Co~i~elon
20 upon a mo~ion by Commissioner ~uer, ~econded by Oommis~'ioner ~lutcel, ~n~ carried
21 at an ~Journe~ Re. ar ~eoti~ of ~aid Pl~ni~ Commission hel~ on September 2~,
22 1951, t~t ~mri~ce No, !51 be deni~ for the re.sons above s~t forth.
2~ The wte on cat~ mo~ion to %e inco~ormte~ in sai~ Ee,~olutiOn No. 6 - Serios
:~;'~: 24 1951-52, ',~s as follows I
~]~'": 25 AYES: ~MMISSlOL~RS~ G~uer, ~l~ko, ~pgood, Riutoel, ~ch~icher, [;chutte
26 ~0ES ~ ~IISS I0~ ~ None.
NOT VOTINGI Vice-Ohai~ S~ers ooeupyi~ the Chai~ ~t ti~e of voti~,
r~ ~ 29 ~I~ ~I~0 AOTIO~ ~ae t~en at ~
~:,~:.i Pl~ni~ 0ommi~si.n held on the 2~th day of S~tember, 1951.
Secre~ar~ 0i~y Pl~o~sion