PC 1954-1955-62 ~_~OL~TION NO, 62 -- ~ ' '~-55
A ~LUTiON OF THE CA"fY ~-~':~.~2~G C~t~.ISSION 0F ~ C~ 0F
~ ~~G T0 ~ C~ C~ OF ~ C~ OF
~T ~T~iFICATiUN NO, F-5~5~6 BE ~,
'~, ~e City ~--n~ng C~ssio~ of ~e Ci~- of ~e~ has receiv~ a
1~ Ue~ified Petition ~ ~e p~y ~e~s of ~in re~ p~pe~y sit~ ~
Z
~e No~ 2~ feet of the Weste~!y H-I* of the No~ly H~f of the ~t-
5 er~ F-~ of ~t 9, ~e~ ~nslon, ~ sh~ on ~p m~e ~ ~. H~el on
f~e Ln ~e ~er~s Office of ~s ;knees C~ty~ C~ifo~a (~e ~st
4 H a]~ of said a~e refe~ Ici ~in~ des~ ~ be~rminS at the No.h-
east ~er of ~t 9~ ~nin~ .'.hence ~th ~ ~e s~th~t co.er of said
5 lot; ~ence :~esterly ~onE the s~th line of said lot, S chains; ~en~ at
ri~t ~es No~erly 25 chins ~ ~e no~h ]~ne of said lot; then~ eas~'
6 er~ 8 chai~ to the point of beginning, ~cepting there~ ~e West 165
f~t
~e ~ers~ JC~ Y ~EZ --~ l~ ~ 15~ ~st Center Street, ~est
8 ~t ~e a~-= pro~y be re~assifi~ ~ P~,
~ O-l, :~I~0~D C~TA~., ~ ,~ ~e ~esent dwelling on the p~perv
9 ty +~ be ~ ~ a Medi~ Center.
10 1~, ~e City ]~,nn~n~ C~ssion ~d hold a ~blic He~g at ~e City
H~ in the City of ~e~ upon ~id Ve~fi~ Petition of ~SIF~TiON ~.
11 F-54--5~16 on the 6th day of Dec~r, 1~4 ~ conti~ed on De~eber 20,
N~I~ of whi~ s~d ~blio He~ing ~ ~ ~ven ~s ~red ~ la-~ ~d t~ pro-
12 visions of the ~D( ~CiP~ C~, Se~ion 92~; ~d
1~ ~, S~d ~.-.~ssion, ~ due inspection, investi~tion ~d s~dies
m~e ~ itse~ ~ in its beh~, ~d ~er due co, ideation of ~ ~iden~ ~
14 ~s offe~ at said He~in~, does f~ ~ dete~ne ~be fo~owi~ facts:
15 I. ~ere ~ no medical fac~ities in the ~e~a~ vicinity.
16
2. Wi~ ~te off-strut ~,= available, it w~d a~e~- thzt
~ ~ a ~ble lo~on for ~ a use.
17
3. ~s is a heav~y trave~ ~~e not ~ble for ~e.~: ~ ~--
18 dw-11 ~ ng ~es.
A~ 4- A M~ Cen~r w~d n~ ~ de~~ ~ ~e pro~ies ~ the
20 ~, ~~,~ ~ ~0L~ ~T ~ ~ C~ ~ING C~I~!ON ~Y
~S T0 ~ C~ C0~0~ OF ~ C~ 0F ~ ~T ~L~S~C~ION N0.
21 F-5~5~16 ~ ~.
22 ~ ~~G ~L~ION i~ si~ ~ a~ ~ me t~s 2~ d~ of
2~ ~' 1~
25 ' R. S. S~PS, ~ha~
26
~ OF C~~ )
29 O~Y ~ 0~ ) ss.
I, G. E. HOLY~, Se=e~ ~-T~ of the City Pl-,~ing C~,~sion of the
~1 City of ~e~, do he~ ~i~ +~,t ~e for~g ~ION N0. ~ - ~
1~55 w~ ~t~c~ ~ vo~ u~ ~ ~p~%ve ~S~I~ION N0. 16 mt ~
52 ~j~ ~= Me~ing of ~e Ct~ ~---~-~ C~lssion of ~e City of
he~ on ~.e ~ day of De~, 195&' ~ ~e fo~owl~g ~te of ~e ~rs thcre, f:
I ~_v~: C(~SSIONE~S: Rin%cel, Schumacher, S~%te, S---~-s and Th~pson.
~$OES: C~e~~: ~aner.
~ ABSEBT: O(~SIOl~: A~:st, .=.apgoo~ and
C~--~-si~ner Hapgood ente=~ the meeting ~ it was voted to reconsider the
~eclassificati~n. The orig~-~ motion was ag~-~ ~-~tted by the C~.issfon
4 ~e second vote on __~/~2TION ~0. 62 - SERIES 195~-55 was as follows:
5 A~S: C~rr._~qiONERS: Rlntc~l, Scb~-~er, Schutte, ~ ...... ~rs and Thompson.
NOES: C~3S1D]~S: Gauer and Hapgood.
? The motion was ~ lost be~e of the lack of the twc-thi.-ds majority of
~e en'~ire C~mission; therefore EE~0LUTION MO. 62 - S~T~ 1954-55 is to deny ,
8 ~LASSI~ICATION ~0. F-54-5~16.
~: 9 IN WITNESS WHEKEOF, I have hereunto set my hamd +~- 2Otb ~a~ of December, 19~J~
15