PC 1955-1956-140 R_ESOLUTION NO. 1;40 - SERIF~...!955.56
A Rg~OLUTION OF Tim CITY P~Z~ C~SIOt~ O~ Tim CITY OF
,~HER~;RS, Th~ City Pl~nln9 Co~ission o% ghe City of Ana~eim has rcceived
a Verified Pegi'gton from Fr~TON DE~LO~ENT CO., I~.~ 756 South Broadway, Los
2 Angeles 1~, California, as o~ers, SC~P~O and ~,~, 756 South Broadw~, Los
Angel~s ll~, California, as Authorized Ag~n~s, or a certain p~c~l of real prop-
~ erty si~umged ~n the City of Anaheim~ County of Or,ge, State of California, des-
cribed as ~ollous:
4
Lo~s 1~ ~-1]~ 18-2l~ ~d 30-JJ inclusive of Tract ~o. 1~ locabed
5 on ~he east side of Euclid Avenue between C~rrito; ~venu¢ ~d
~' Ball Road.
The appllc~ re~ests a ~;A~ of 5he 70 foot frontage retirements
". ~ on the ~ove described lots.
.~ 8 ~R~ The City Pl~.in~ Co~ission did hold a P~lic He~ing at th~
~ ]ity }{all in the Cit~ of Anah¢~ on March 5~ 1956, NOT~F~ of which said P~lic
] 9 {~ins w~re duly 91v~'n a's. re~ire~ b3 law'Rnd the provisions of the
~ ~NIC~AL C~S~ Sectioh 920o~ ~d'
,, 10 ' '
~'~ Said. Co;~isgion, ~er due inspect;,~n~ investigation ~d studies
11 made by itself ~ in i~s b~.haif ~d ~ter du~ 'cdnsideration of roll evidence
lZ ~reports offered at said H~a~ing~ does find '~d de~e~'ine th~ followin9 fmcts:
1. This tract was stated when in the Co,~ty which allows 60 foot
1~ frontages.
2. All lots contain ~ m~nim~ of ?200 sgu~e feet or
14 3. Othcr v~i~ces have bee'n 9r~tcd for tracts under
conditions.
15
17 TP~ F~6OIN~ R~UTIO~ ~s signed ~d approved by me this 5th day of
~ch, 1~56.
18
~ .TT~T ~ '
~TATE ~ ~L~ORN~ )
)
I~ K. W. ~&LL~ Sec~¢~3 of the Cit3 Pl~nin9 Co~ission of the Cit~ of
~6 ~¢im~ do hereby ¢e~tifM that the fo~egoin9 R~OLOTION ~. lkO - SER~S
~as passed ~d adopted by a motion duly m~d¢~ seconded ~d ¢~ried a~ ¢ Regul~
87 ;~eeting of the City Planing Co~ission of thc Cit3 of A~heim, held on the ~th
28 ~ of ~ch~ 1956.
~ 29 I~ ~IT~S ;~E~ I have hereunto set my h~h d~ of
~0
'