Loading...
PC 1957-1958-131 R__~' 'LUTION NO. 131 - SERIES 1957.-.5~ A RESOLUTION OF TF~ CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF A~A~IM RECOMMENDLNG TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF T~R CItY OF A~P~.IM THAT RECLASSLFICATION NO. F--57-58-25 B~ AFPROV~D. WHEREAS, The City Pl~n~ug Commission of the City of Anaheim has received a Verified Petition from the property owner(s) of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as follows: Lots I and 2 of the Kellogg Homestead Tzact, in the City of Anaheim, County of Oran§e~ State of california, as per Map therec, f recorded in Book $, Page 51, Mis- cellaneous Maps, records of said county. Exc~'pting therefrom the East 3 ~cres of said Lot 1. A/so excepting therefrom the south 277 feet thereof. The East line of Lot 1 is the centerline of the 60 foot street known as Euclid Avenue. The applicants, Raymond Speh~r ~nd R~.vmond Perrier, 8871 Katella Avenue, A~eim, California~ request that the above property be reclassified from R-A, Residential Agricultural to C-2: General Com~aercial. WHEREAS, The City Pl~ing Commission did hold a Public Hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim upon said VERIFIED PETITION of RECLASSITIOATION NO. F- 57-58-23 on the 2nd,' day of December , 19 57, NOTICE of which said Public Hearing was duly given as required by law and the provisions of the ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE, Section 9200; and WN~REAS, Said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and studies made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of ail evidence and reports offered at said Hearings, does find and determine the following fac%s: 1. The applicant stip,~lated that he wo~ld be willing to accept C-I, Neighborhood Commercial instead of C-2, ~neral Commercial as originally requested. 2. The applicant offeredto deed land required for the widening of Ball Road. $. There is commercial zoning on the other three corners at this major intersection. 4. T~e l~n4 is not suitable for residential use. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE ANAF~IM CITY PLA~ING C0MMIgSION P~REBY RECOMMENDS TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAPrgIM THAT RECLASSIFICATION N0. F- 57-58-23 BE 32~PROV~D. T~E FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 2nd day of December, 1957. SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY ~ING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANA~RIM ) I, R. W. MUNGAII~ Secretary of the City P18nning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing RESOLUTION NO. ~131, S~RIES ...... 1957--58 was passed ~4 adopted a% a Re~l~ Meeting of ~he City Planning Commission of %he City of ~eim, held on the 2nd day of December , by the following vo~e of ~he members thereof: ,. A~S: 00~$$I0~: ~ed, D~o~, Gauer, Hapgood, Mauerh~, Morris, S~ers, Thompson, ~d M~gall. NOES: CO~SSI0~S: None. ..... $i05~ :' IN WITNESS WF~REOF, I ~ve heretic set ~ h~d this 2nd ~y of December, 19~. : SEC~T~Y ~l CIT~ING C0~ISSION