Loading...
PC 1957-1958-56 ~RF~LUTION NO. 56 - SERIES A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING C0A~ISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM C~ANTING VAPJANC~ NO. 824. WHEREAS, The City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim has received a Verified Petition from the Owner(s) of a certain parcel of real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State o£ California, described as follows: Lot 36 through 39 of Tract 97, and further described as 1129 N. Lemon Street, Ana- heim, California. Petitioner: 30~ A. CANO and V~RGIL ZARLING~, 937 N. Claudina Street, Anaheim. WHEREAS, The City Planning Commission did hold a Public Nearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim, on September 16, 1957,NOTICES of which said Public Nearing were duly given as required by law and the provisions of the ANAHEIM A~JNICIPAL CODE, Section 9200; and WHEREAS, Said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and studies made by itself and in its behalf and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said Hearing, does find and determine the following fac%s: 1. The subject property is located across the street from property classified as M-2, Heavy Manufacturing. 2. It is requested than an M-1 use, wood working, in the form of pattern m~king, be permitted in tile applicant's building, which was moved to ~n~ location on account of the new Riverside Freeway construction. (Items 3 and 4 on attached page) NOW, TMEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COAS~ISSION HEREBY GRAATS VARIJkNCE NO. 824. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 16th day of September, 1957. SEcREtARY ANAHEIM C~LANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY 0FANAHEIN ) I, R. W. ~UNGALL, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing RESOLUTION NO. 56 - SERIES 1957-58, was passed and adopted by a motion duly made, seconded and carried at a n Adjourned Regular Meeting of the City Planning Commission held on the 16th day of September, 1957. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have h=reunto se~his 16th day of Septtm- bet, 1957. s cm TAHY A A IM cIT iN 3. These patterns for the most part will be made for ~iectra Motors located across the street. 4. The granting of this variance will not be detrimental ~o other properties in the area.