PC 1957-1958-74 L1JTIO~ ~Co 74
i
W~S, The City' Planing Commission, of-~he Clay of ~eim has received
a V~rified Pe~i~ion from ~he O~er(s) of a cer~ui4 parcel of real'proper~y situated
In ~he~Ci~y of ~eim, County of'Or.ge, 'S~ate of C~ifornia, described as follows:
~ WaS, The. City Plming C~ission did hold a ~blic Hearing at-~he
City Nall in ~he Cit~ of ~eim,. on ~o~= 7, X$~7, NOTICES of which said '
~blic Ne~ing were duly given as required b~ law a~d the provisions o~ the
~ICIP~ ,CODE, Sec%ion: 92u0; ~d~ .
~S, Said .Co~ission, after due inspection, investigation md s~udies'
made'by i%self ~d in i~S be~lf ~ after due consideration of all evidence
reports offered a~ said He~ing, does'fiud'~d de~e~ine ~he following fac~s:
NOW, T~FO~, BE IT ~SOL~ T~T T~ ~alM CITY ~ING CO~ISSION
2. S'et-~'~ Xatel~ A~: to'~.a'm~ of 20 [eet fr~
D, , ~ d~ed~g to ~h~ ,~: .Off ~ :60 fee~ ffz~~ t~ ~te~l~ of ~te~'Av~ue
T~ F0~GOING ~SOLUTION'is si~od ~d approved,by me ~his
~o'~r, 1957. ;~ -'
0~I~ ~IM CITY ~i~G CO~ISSIO~
ATTEST:
SEC~T~Y ~EIM CITY ~ING CO~ISSION
STATE OF C~I~O~IA )
CO~TY OF O~NGE )
CITY OF ~A~IM )
I, ' Secre~a~ or ;the City. Pl~ing Co~ission of ~he'
'City of ~m,~'~&B~,certify that ~he foregoing :~$OLUTION NO. ~
1R ~ ' ,' was passed ~d adopted b~ a motion duly made, seconded ~d C~ied a~
a ~ ~' . Re~lar Meeting of the Ci~y Plying Co~ission held on the-
day'of. 0~o~=. I~7, '" ". : '* '"
IN WITh~$S ~OF, I have heretic set my h~d ~his . dst of '. ':
19~.': . ·
:,' ...... ,r:..: SEC~T~Y ~IM CITY P~iNG .CO~ISSION
' -' ~oa:he:27 ~g ~a~ l~e ~i to,~t~ el ~ Street, g30.'~O ,re
l~c .,~i t° ~ c~t~I~e'~.of ~ot 'St:eet~''~' ~8,00 ~eet ~ly ~ ~ea~ed
' go: ~a~ 'c~nge:l~e of ~tel~ A~ a~ 60.00'~eet a~t~I7 '~ ~e4
.:~