PC 1957-1958-96 A ~SOLUTION 0~ T~ CITY ~G ~0~SSION
~C0~G T0 T~ CITY C0~C~ 0F T~ CITY 0~ ~ T~ ~C~$~I~ION
N0. ~57-58-5 ~ ~Q~D_
W~tEREAS, The City Pi~ing Commission of the City of ~n~beim has received
a Verified Petition fro~, the property owner(s) of certes.in real property situated
in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as follows:
l>~rcel I: VP-~TING: Nicholas J. Dovalis and Lill~-~ Dov~lis. That portion of the SW
~of the SW~ of Section 18, in T4S, RiOW, S.B.B. & M., described as follows: Begin-
nih§ at a point in the West line of said ~ection 15, distant Thereon 159.00 feet ~orth
of the SW corner thereof, and r,,n~ing thence North along said West line, 129.00 feet;
thence ~-ast p~rallel with the South line of said Section, 294.00 feet; thence South
p~rallel with the West line of said Section, 129.00 feet; thence West, p~rallel with
the South line of said Section, 294.00 feet to the point of beg{~ing. Parcel 2:
WSrING: James G. Gantes and Madeline J. Gantes. That portion of the SW} of the SW~ of
Section 15, in T4S, K10W, S.B.B. & M., described as follows: Beginning at = point i'4-
the West line Of said Section 18, distant 288.00 feet North ~f the SW corner
and r,,~ing thence North along said West line, 144.00 feet; thence East, parallel with
the South line of said Section 18, 294.00 feet, thence South p~rallel with said West
line of Section 18, 144.00 feet; thence West parallel with the South line of said
Section, 294.00 feet to the point of beginning.
Nichola~ J. Dovalisand James G. Gantes, 9946 Magnolia Avenue, Anaheim, California, as
Owners, request that the subj~et property be reclassified from R-A, R~SIDEATIAL A6~II-
· CULTURAL, to C-l, NEIGHBORHOOD CON~C/AL. Due to an error, Parcel 1 was not
advertised in the original publication of the Legal Notice.
WF~EAS, The City Planning Commission did hold a Public Hearing at the
City Hall in the City of Anaheim upon said VERLF?~ PETITION of RECLASSIFICATION
NO. F- 57-58-5 on the 21st day of October ,'19 57 , NOTICE of ~b/ch said
Public Hearing was duly given as required by law and the provisions of the
AN~w~.vu MUNICIPA5 CODE, Section 9200; and
W~REAS, Said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and studies
made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence
and reports offered at said ~earings., does find and determine the following facts:
1. The subject property is located on Magnolia Avenue neam B~ll Road,
the intersection of two major streets.
2. The proposed installations will be in the natuze of sezvice businesses.
NOW, THER~0~, BE IT P~E$0LVED THAT TF~ ANA~IM CITY PLANNING CONDIISSION
h~BY REC03~/~DS TO THE CITY COUNCIL 0~ THE CITY 0~ ANAI~IM THAT RECLASSI~IOA~ION
NO. ~- 57-58-5 B~ A/~ROVRD SUB3~CT TO:
1. The deeding to ~he C£±y of Anahein of 20 feet along ~agnol~a Avenue for
street wfilen&ng.
2o The erec~£on of a 6 foot cone=ere block wall aIong the no~th an~ east property
lines where the sub3e:t p=operty abuts residential pzoperty.
3. The filing of C-l, Deed Restrictions as standard by the City of Anaheim.
4. -~ngiueerin§ Requirements.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me ~his 21st day of
October, 1957.
CHAIRMAN ANAREIM CITY FLANNING COMMISSION
I, R.W. MUNCdLLL, Secre~ry of the City Planning Commission of the City
of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing RESOLUTION NO. ~_-SERIES
1957--58 was passed and adopted a% a n Adjourned Regular Meeting of ~he City
Planning Commission of tho City of Anaheim, held on the 21st day of October , 1957
bF Lhe following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, DuBois, Hapgood, Mauerbzn, Morris, S,~ers,
Thompson, and ~unga~l.
NOES: C0__~u!SSIONERS: None
ABSENT: C0~wISSIONERS: None
IN WITNESS W~r~REOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 21st day of October, 1957.