PC 1958-1959-94_[
OLUTION NO. 94 - SERIES
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY. OF ANAREIM
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT RECLASSIFICATION
NO. ~__~.~o_~n ~, a.~.~',~,~.
WHEREAS. The City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim has received
a Verified Petition from the property owner(s) of certain real property situated
in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as follows.'
That portion of the North:Jest quarter of tho Northwest quarter of Section 12,
T4S, RiOW, in the Rancho 5an Juan CaJon de Santa Ana,.City of Anaheim,, County of
Orange, State of Californi~ as said section is shown on a map recorded in Book 51,
page 10 of M. iscellaneous ~ps, in the o~fica of the county recor.~mr of saia county,
described as follows, .Beginning at a pOint on the ~est line of said section,
South 1.~.2~ feet from the Northwest corner of the south half of the Northwest quarter
of' the Northwest quarter of said sectioni thence South 85.00 feet along ~aid West
lanai thence East 150.00 feet; thence North 65.00 feet parallel with said West
lanai thence Wast 150.00 feet to the point of beginning, an~ further .:iescribed as
414 North Placentas Avenue. The p~operty is presently classified R-A, P~ESIDENTIAL
AGRICULTURAL,
The applicant, Lewis L. Sinor, 916 W. North St. Anaheim, California, as
~equests that the above property he reclassified fro~ R-A~ RE$IDt~rrlAL AGRICULTURAL
to C-i, N~ICQ~BOR~I~O0 C~I~RCtAL for a Real Estate O~fice.
WHEREAS, The City Planning Commission did hold a Public Hearing at the
City Hall in the City of Anaheim upon said VERIFIED PETITION of RECLASSIFICATION
NO. ~- on the ~iday of , 19 , NOTICE of which said
Public~g~f~ was dUly g~ven as req~r~ law end'he previsions of the
ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE, Section 9200; and
WHEREAS, Said Commission, after due inspection, Investigation and studies
made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence
and reports offered at said Hearings, does find and determine the following facts:
1. The applicant p~evtousl¥ repasted permission b~Variance ~or a
Real £state O~{ice, but said variance was re~erzed back to the
Plannin~ Co~ission
a~lied for,
2. The ~o~rty Is not de~reable for residential put.see on accou~
of fronting on a State ~g~ay.
3. T~ ~o~y m~ ~ co~tside~ed as ~g~y C~rcial ~de~ the new
proposed
NOW, THEREFORE, :BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE'ANAPLEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
HEREBY RECOMMENDS TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT RECLA!'SIFICATION
NO. F-58.59..~ be Approved for C-l, NEI~tBORiiOOD C(~I~EECliAL, subject
1. The fil&~g of G-I, Deed ~est~i=tion$ a~ a~p~oved ~ the City Att~zne¥
2, ~e dedication of 53 fee% f=~ the ~nter line of Pla~ehtia Ave.
3. ~ze ~t~t' lm~e~n~ plans and install afl ~pr:ove~n~s in accordance with
s~and~ plus on file in ~he office of ~he City ~ginee~.
4. The ~nt of S2.00 ~r ft. for street lfgh~ing put.sea.
5. A ~-d~y t[~ ltmi~ for the c~Pletton of the a~e
6. ~ectlon of ~he build[rig tn confo~ty with zende~tng su~ttted,
7. ~e buEldtng [1ne set back to be 6 Eeet ba~k of th~ p~rty itne an~ nothing
~tte~ ~ ~his a~a except landscaping.
.'[ THE ~O~GOING ~SOLUTION is signed ~d approved by me this
November,
STATE 0F C~IF0~IA ) ~'/
COUNTY 0F 0~N~E ) ss.
CITY 0F ~M
I, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City
of Anaheim,R~i~~~tif7 that the foregoing RESOT,UTION NO. ~~ gH Series
was passed and adopted at a Regular Meeting of the City
I~EEni'rrg Commission of the Ci%7 of Anaheim, held on the 3rd da7 of November ' 1958
b7 the following vote of the members there,f..'.
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
Allred, r~Boia, Gauer, Hapgood, Mauerhan, ~orris,
b~mmers, Thom~.t~n, ~ngall,
NOES: COMMISSIONERS .'
N~ne
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS =
None
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set mY__~.tl~han
f [-~ ~3rc/, day of ,ovembe.r, 1958.
SEC~'~TARY ANAHEIM ClT/~ P~NNIN~ COMMISSION