PC 1958-1959-213 R~SOLUTION NO. 213 - S~RIES ~58-59
A R~SOLUTION OF TH~ CITY PLANNING COt~LISSION OF TH~ CITY OF ANAHEIM RECOMMENDING
TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE cr~ OF AMA~IM That the Parking Restrictions
imposed in Reclassification Mo. F-5a-55-5 b~.. chan~ed.
WHEREAS the City Council of the City of Anaheim did forward to the City Planning
Commission of the City of Anaheim Reclasstficatien Ne. F-5~-55-5 for a consideration of the
Parking Requirements as established hy Ordinance 1035 - Condition 5 whereby 75~ of the
property must he reserved for ®fl-street parking~ and
WHaRF. AS, the property under c®nsideration is described as being located appro, tmetely
150 ft. north of Katella Avenue ®n the west side of Harbor Blvd. and having 55 ft. frontage
en Harbor Blvd. and a depth of 135 ft; and,
WHEREAS the City Planning Co,,nission did hold a ~lblic Hearing at the City Hall
in the City ef Anaheim upon said oondition Mo. 5 in Ordinance No. 1035 as established in
Reclassificatien Mo. I~ F-54-55-5 on the 27th day of April, 1959, Notice of which said
P~hlic Hearing was duly given as required hy law and the ~x~, provisions of the
Anaheim Municipal Code, Section 9200, and
WHEREAS, Said Commission after due inspecti®n investigatien made by itself and
in its behalf and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said
Hearing, does find and determine the following facts~
1. This area was originally 10 acres and was zened C-1 to he develeped as a
Shopping Center.
2. Suheequently with the advent of Disneyland a Service Station and Metels were
permitted to he established on this property leaving presently ®ne parcel 55 ft.
x 135 ft. zoned as C-1.
3. The preperty is now in escrow to a new owner, who ~naa~× propeses to develop
samo with C-1 Uses.
4. With the 75% requirement for parking it would he impossible to develop same,
and even with the size of store pre~osed for the property, ~t ~!d not
be posslble to provide 50 ~ parking in view of the set-back and landscaping X
requirements of the City's representative on the architectural Committee.
5. The applicant, however, stated that he had arranged with the Union Oil Co.
tc obtain 10 parking spaces directly seuth of the subject property.
6. This agreement with the Union Oil Co. carries an clause that eitho: party can
cancel the agreement upon 90 days notice.
7. There is a permanent 20 ft. easement across the Union Oil Co. property for
access to the subject property.
Now, Therefore, Be it Resolved that the Anaheim City Planning Commission thereby Recommends
~~-~__ ~ ~ to ~he City C6bncil of the City of Anaheim
that in Ordinance No. 1035 condition No. 5 be changed to 50~ off street parking to
conform with the present C-1 requirements of the Mrmnicipal Code.
THE FOI~GOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 27th day of April, 1959.
STATE OF C~IFO~IA )
CO~TY O~ O~GE ) ss.
CITY OF ~IM )
I, ~. W. ~, Secreta~ of %he City P18~XnE Co~ssion
of ~eXm, do hereby certify tha~ the foregoing ~SOLUTION NO.
19~-59 was passed ~d adopted at ~ Adjourned Kevlar Meetin~ of the City
Plying Co~ssion of the CXtF of ~eim, held on the 27%hday of A~il , 1959
by the follow,ns vote cf the member~
A~S: CO~ISSIO~S: ~, ~IS~ ~RS~ T~ON.
NOES: C0~ISSI0~S~ NO~S, ~.
~S~: C0~SSI0~S: ~, ~, ~~.
IN WITNESS WI~OF, I have hereunto set ~ hand th~s ~Tth day of A~rtl, 1959.
rC.- CO~ISSION
A