PC 1958-1959-226 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANI~II~G COMMISSi01~. OF THE CItY 0F
~S, The C~ty Pi~n~ Co~iss~on of the Cit~ of ~etm ~s received
a Verified Petition from the Owner(s) of a certain parcel of real pr0pert~ situated
in the City of ~eim, Cowry of 0r~ge, State of California, described as follows:
Lot No. 51 of T~act No. 1~40.
WHSI~S, The City Pla~ing Commission did hold a Public Hearing at the
City Hall in the City of Anaheim, .on May 18, 1959 I~0TICES of which said
Public Hearing were duly given as required by law and the provisions of the A~AHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE; Section 9200; and'
made by itself m~d in its ~rehalf and after due eonsideratio~of.
and
reports offered at said Hearing, does find and determine 'the following facts:
1.' ~is wall wiS1 ex,'end 6t6" into the fron~ yard.
2. This dweliing has a s~andard 25 foot front yard setbacA(.
3. This wall loca?ion was discussed wi~h 'the Building Dept. who would not grant this
encroach.hr, however, ~hrougH some error ~he wall ~s built and is nOW in place.
4. ~Ae neighbors agreed tha~ the presen~ location would be ~greeable to them.
5. It will pro~ec~ the safety of the children in the area.
6. Ir'would appear ~ha~ ~here should be some consideration given to establishing where.
swim~ng pools shoula be located where ~heir location in a side yard requires
fence encroac~en~ in the fron~ y~rd.
NOW, T~EFO~, BE IT ~SOLVED THAT THE ~AHEiM CITY P~NIN~ C0~ISSIO~
STATE OF C~iF0~IA )
COUNTY OF O~N~E )
I, R, ~MUNG~L, SeoretarF of the'City Planning Co.lesion of the
CitF of ~eim, do hereb~ certify that the foregoing ~SOLUTION' N0. 226 - S~IES
195~S9, was passed ~d adopted b~ a motion dul~ made,' seconded and ~arried
an Adjourned Re~lar MeeZing of the CltF Pl-nning Co.lesion held on 'the 18th
da~ of May, 1959.
IN WIT~ESS W~0F, I have' heretic set.~..-h~d this 18th da~ of May,