PC 1959-1960-18 3LUTION NO. 18 - SERIES 1959-~'
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
REC0MMENDING T0 THE CITY COUNCIL 0F THE CITY 0F ANAHEIM THAT RECLASSIFICATION
NO. F-59-60-6 BE PITIED.
WHEREAS, The City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim has received
a Verified Fetition from the property owner(s) of certain real property situated
in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as follows:
Lots 1-§ inclusive of Tract No. 1948 and further described as being on the east side of
North Magnolia Avenue comprizing four lots north of Greenbrier Avenue and tvm lo~s south of
said street.
~le Applicants, MR. & ~S.MARTIN SORKIN, 1016 Magnolia Avenue, Anaheim, California.
MR. & ~S. CRA HARDAC~R, 1012 Magnolia Avenue, Anaheim, California.
~,~. & MRS. CLIFFORD NF-/~ON, 1006 Magnolia Avenue, Anaheim, California.
MR. a PTIS. ~.~NST. JULIAN, 1000 Magnolia Avenue, ANaheim, California
MR. & MRS. ~. P. ~, 930 Magnolia Avenue, Anaheim~ California.
MR. a ]~RS. G. &eDGERS, 924 Magnolia Avenue, Anaheim, California.
request that the subject properties be reclassified from R-l, SINGLE PA~LY RRSID]~NTIAL to
C-I, NRIGHBORHOOD C~RCIAL.
WHEREAS, The City Planning Commission did hold a Public Hearing at the
City Hall in the City of Anaheim upon said VERIFIED PETITION of RECLA$SIFIOATION
NO. F- 59-60-6 on the 3rd day of August , 1959 , NOTICE of which said
Public Hearing was duly given as required by law and the provisions of the
ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE, Section 9200; and
WHEREAS, Said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and studies
made by itself ~ud in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence
and reports offered a% said Hearings, does find and determine the following facts:
1. This is a comparatively new tract composed entirely of single family residences and in
the opinion of the Commission is still good residential property.
2. A variance w~s granted for an accounting office~n Lot 1 because this adjoined
acre&Se prnperty ,,~o.~ which a C-1 classification h?.d been requested.
3. This would be shoe-stringing zoning which is not warranted at the present time and if
th/s were granted, could extend further down this same street in the same tract.
~ RESOLVED THAT THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
X~ ..... ru--~-_ _THAT RECLASSIFICATION INCLUDH
NO. F-59-60-~ be D~NIRD.
-1-
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 3rd day o£ August, 1959.
,(' ~ J" C~L4IRMAN AISAkEIM CITY PLAN~.IN~C0~MISSION
/
COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, R.W. MUNGALL, SecretarF of the City Planning Commission of the City
of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing RESOLUTION N0.]~ 18,
1959-60 was passed and adopted at a Regular Meeting of the City
Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on the 3:d day of August , 19 $9
by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSI0~NERS: DuBois, Hapgoed, Ma~crha~n, Mozris, Summers, i-nompson,
~ungall.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
SECRETARY ANAHEIM~ PI~.NNING COMMISSION
-2-