PC 1959-1960-153 A EESOAUTION 0F ~ C~Y i'LA_~XN~ C0~$$I0! 0F ~ CITY 0F A~m~r~
RECOM~E~DIN6 TO ~ CITY COUNCIL OF ~HE CI~Y 0F A~Aw~r~ THAI I~Z~SSIFICATXON
w-,~AS, ~he City Flanning C~-~ssion of the Ci%~y of Anaheim ~ received
a Veriffied Petition from v. he property o~ner(s) of cert~ real property situated
in %he City of ~-~eim, County of Orange, S%a~e of _~ox-nia, described as follows:
All =.ha2 cer~ain land si~uated in ~.e Sta~e of Calif.: C~.,ty'of Orange, Cit-/ of,
Ana,hei~ con. cistinc~ of ~o.._ -2as%er!¥. . 115.7~ ft. of the "~¢'~
no--'~herly 165.00 ft. of the ~ cf the .~P~ of +~he 5~-~- of Seci. ion 17, T~S, RiC~,
S. B. B. &~.
~--~,e applicants, AN~ and JAMES ~O.~qIS, ~2~ ~ailace Ave., Fulle~on, Calif.,
re~es~ ~at tS~ subje~ pro~' ~ reclasslf~ed fr~ ~-A, ~I~ A~.~,
to C-i, ~i~H~ ~RCi~.
W~AS, The City Plmmming Comml~sion did hold a I~blic Heariug at
City H~ll in ~e City of ~beim upon ~d ~ ~TION of ~~0N
N0. F-5g-~0-70 on ~e 18th ~ay of Jan~ , ~0 , ~TI~ of w~ch ~d
~blic H~ ~s d~y ~ven as re~d by ~-w ~d ~e p~visio~ of
~ ~IC~ ~DE, Sec~i~ 9~; ~
w~,~u~.S, Said Commission, after ~e inspection, investigation an~ stu~ies
reports offered at said Hear~$, does fiz~ az~ determine the foll~wing facts:
1. T'he applicant proposes to erect a modern office buildin9 on the subject property
conr~ininc 6
2. The property doe~ ~ide on R-I, SINCX~ FAMILY R~SID~MTIAL, but there is a
6 ft. masonr)- wall separating the t~o uses.
3. No objections were raised by the residents of the Sin$1e Family Tract at
the Commission hearing.
NOW, ~0~, ~ IT RESOLVED THAT THE AN~.IM CIT~ PLAN~XNg COMMISSION
HI~EBY ~EC0~2~DS TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF T~E CITY OF A~w~.~M THAI HECLASSXFXCATION
NO. F-~,u-~O-Ta .~o.. rec!~_ssified from_ ~-A, P--=SID~.~!.!)--r A~-=T~"~''~, '~0 C-l,
NEIGHBORI:OOD COMA~RCIAL~ subJe:t to:
-1-
!. The._ filing of C-t Deed Re_~i~ions aD,roved by the City A~.-to_-ney~ l=~-'-nln? the uses
to ~-rofessional of.£i~es o~2y.
2. That the building be erected essentially as sho~n on the Plot Plan and rendering
presented.
3- That there he a dedication of 32 ft. to t.he City of ~.nahei~ on Or_an_ce Ave.
Standard App.-oved Plans on file in the Office of the City Fngineer.
5. That there he a payment of $2.00 per front ft. on Qrange Ave. for Street
6. T~mt there be a 90 day .'~..~e limit for the_ accomplishment of ¢ondi~.ons 1~ 3~ ~ and 5.
~ FOEEGOING KESOLUTION is si~r~d and a~Dr~ved ~ me *w~$ i£Lh day of Jan,,
STATE OF CALIFOI:~Fr_A
CO~l"/ OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF
IN WI2~ESS WHEreOF, ! have hereunz~ se% mF hau~ ~s 1S~ day ~ Jan., 1~0.