PC 1960-1961-104 .:~SOLUTION NO, 104 - S. ERIES .1960I~.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY ~ O0~ISSI0~ 0~ THE C~Y 0~ ~AHEI~ ~I~; ';~.~ NO. 1307
W~S, The Ott~ Plying 0o~tsston of tho City of ~oim has received
a Vorifiofl Poti~ion from tho ~nor{s} of a oert~n parcel of real propert~ situated
in the 0it~ of ~aheim, Count~ of Orange, Sta~o'.o~' ~alt.fornia, describe~ as ~ollows:
.... ..~
'.
~e north one-half of the south one-half of ~he southwest quarter of the fi~'~heast quarter of
Section 12, T6~ship 4 Sough~ R~nge 10 ~esg, in ~he R~cho San Juan Ca3on de Sanga ~a,
City of ~nahe~m, County of Orange~ 8gage of Califor~a~ ~s per map recorded in book 5~
page 10 of ~scellaneous Maps~ in ghe office of ghe county recorder of said
~e Appiicang ~
SUNKIST HO~S
g~'i Lincoln Ave.
Anaheim, Calif.
WHEREAS, The City Planning Co~mission did hold a Public Hearing at the
0it¥ Hall in the City of Anaheim, on October 17, 1960 NOTICES of which said
Public Hearing were duly given as required by law and the provisions of the ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE, Section 9200; and
~1--
WHEREAS, Said C~..~ission, after due inspection,~estigation and studies
made by itself and in i~behalf and after due considerat~ of all evidence and
reports offered at said Hearing, does find and determine the following facts:
1. Althoagh the homes west of Sunkist St. have a minimum floor area of 1525 sq. ft., the
Council resolution approving this Tract No. 2767 stipulated a minimum of 1350 sq. ft.
of floor area.
2. Requested yard waiver appears to be most critical on the No. 6062 floor plan which has
a S bedroom, 3 garage layout around a central patio. In some of these cases, the pro-
posed rear yard is only 17 ft. However, they have one 20 to 25 ft. side yard which would
compensate for the sHA'li09 ~ear!yard.
S. Although the request constitt~s a:wAive~ .on practically the entire tract, the over
all development appears to be a goo~ one and the .f2ontl Mards. which, ve~y from iS feet
to 22 feet appear to be necessary in all but a £ew cases','bacause of the:proposed floor
plans.
~, Lot No. SS and No. 63 did not meet the minimum side yard requirement on a reverse
lot. Ample room is available, however, to make the necessary adjustments.
$. No one appeared in opposition to the petition.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
HEREBY GRANT~ VA~tIANC~ NO. 1307 POR A WAIV]E OP PROI~Ff~2ND P~ YARD SETBACK RRQUIP~NTS
ON T~ACT NO. 2767, subject to the following conditions:
1. The completion of all improvements provided by final T~act No. 2767.
2. The provision of adequate side yards on Lots 58 and 63.
S. Development in accordance with plans presented.
~ ~OP~GOING CONDITIONS are found to be a necessary prerequisite to the use of the
property in order to preserve the safety and welfare of the gitizens of .Anaheim.
On roll acll the foregoing resolu'~ion was passed by the following vote:
AYBS: CO~ISSION]~S: Gauer, Marcoux, Morris, Mungall, Summers, Hapgood.
NORS: COmmISSIONeRS: None.
ABSRNT: COMMISSIONBXS: Allred.
THE FOREGOING RESOLU2ION is signed and approved by me this17th day of October,1960.
CHAIm~N-A~NAHEIM CITY PLABNIN~ C0~0N
ATTEST.L~'
STATE 0F C~IF0~IA )
COUNTY 0F 0~E )
CITY 0F ~EIM )
I, RI~ R~B, S~cretarM of the City Pla~ing Co~issio;~ of the
City of Anaheim, do hereby certif~ that the foregoing ~SOLUTION N0. 104 - S~IESl~50-'61
19 - , was passed and adopted bM a motion duly made, seconded'and carried at
a Regular Meeting of the City Pla~ing Commission held on the 17th
daf of October, 1~60.
IN WITNESS W~EEOF, I have hereunto set mM hand this 17th dam of October, 1760.
SE0~TARY ~IM CITY PL~NIN~