Loading...
PC 1960-1961-110,. .. .~; .-. .. . ~ . ~ . ,' . : ~~~ . ... . ~ :'1 . , y ~- ~~ ,,•.:, '; , a , ' ~ ` : ~ _. ~ '-: . ~,:SOLUTION N0. ~ in - SERIES ic~cn~ ' ?`S: .:,. `c~C:.' . . A RE50LUTION OF THE CITY PI,ANNING COMMISSION UF THE CITY OF ANAHEItd RECOMMENDING TO THE C?TY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT RECLASSIFICATION NO . r ~ ..i t~r. Ef~3~ FAftCL~I. Bq B~ ~.~F~i~D ~YHEREAS, The City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim has raeei~ed a Verified Petition from the property owner(s) oP certaia real property situated in t2ie City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described ~s Pollows: E': j ta . "~_......:e~' ---•- ~ P~'.EX, ii~n 7~re AFtarth a4a'.'LCi faet of 2h~ :~a~tttwast ~tanxte~s vf tha~ Sautt~qci ~a:4~.x uf ahe S~a~tetf~a~~ c~otez2er af S~e2Y.an 1~, Tammcf:Sp 4~autP~~ i:ange !0 araa~, ir~ tt~a ~nelia i.as ~::~y.4te~~, GSty af l~nat~e~ca, ~aune;~ af ~rran~e, ~tgte ot !;alitorn;e, as yx~r r~rep rocos~e3 fn ~eNk 51 F's~aa 10 of k~tscali~nrrouffi t~~pa, fra tha a~'f3ce of ~h~ Countp ~iecordca: af s~id ~duaty, FA3S`~a: "Fi" 'fha seuthr~est q~~rt~~ af tt~o 5autt~rss~ ~uart.x uf ~ha P~1L1SI34t8Ct c~uuastEr ef v~ctSan 17, ~axcsnahip ~ 5auth, ~an~o 2t2 a~~nt, i~ the Far~cho t.o~ Cvyotmh~ ~ity v~ Ar~at~rai~, Goess~ty ~s4 Cr~tngw. Stata rf Cal~ ~~sn.to, ~e pxr map recorded .n !~33nak 5I pe5e 2(- ~f ~ESsc~,tlan~ou~ A~pa~ !n Zhe afi.ica a# the Ccun~,y hacorda~r al,~a5a Caunty. ~M~a~P~ liim A;oxth ~ls~'s.QD feat th~rao~. , ,{;,,,,. 3i~L :r~~'~1~'u~e~:t~G~' ~ $~fq~A@~flity Planning Commission did ;iol~ a Public Hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim upon said 4ERIFIED PETITION of RECLASSIP'ICATION Publica~le$~~3~ was duly g~~endas requi~~~c~~y~law~and tll'e provisionsWOfctheaid ANP.H~IM MiTNICIPAL CODE. Section 9?00; and PVHEREAS, Said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and studies made by itself and in its behalf~ and after due consideratiott of all evidence attd reports offered at said Hearings, does Pind and detsrmine the following Yacts: 2. Patfif~aes rec~n~sts ~ real~~~3~P3aatioa froa~ it-A to H.,S oq F'axtal A(Eaa aoaQhOrly Q48 8t. a8 sub~c~ot pso~wrt~) aud 1:•L on ~aroei g~tbc st~ugberly 27~0 ~ft. ot anb,~e~t pr~er~y) to pexa~3t davelop~aeqt ot mniE~4pYa Se~l~iT resi~eatial ead a~elQbborbood om~ereial uses resp~aeivaly. 2, ~e2lt~ooes q~ ~xpa~ing tDe seee arp~ oS do~elap~ot pravio~alq spprovt~i a~Qer ti~cla~afticetiop ~da. ~~54-60~~7g to thefr eaa8orly nroperty i~~e rather tE~aa tba esrii~r propoaud aort~a-aaath streets Aod Iv4, aafi~9ivia~on. ~. ~b,~etL propart~r abwt~ H.1 oA the aort~t, Gt••9 oa 6me •ast, ?rideat Jum,tor Hi~l~ a^u3oo1 0~ thC ti0dth ~SOQS 8fo1]. 12nif~s erid ~t•1 OH ;he N08t sistoeS tCm~,sx)~~ ~ f B#[s p!'e~~LB 60 $att94e- Fnases Ble~abtms~r Scshoal~ St. Jusl3a Wss~ra Elas~eat~ry Sehooli atsd Cluta 6~stmn l~tea~mt~rq Sals~uol. `~• T~d Ad~Ffls~ aua~rci~, devei~p~~~ad~ cro4ut iS utiliacd tor p~ofeau3oaal o4f~aea~ mnuld ~oaesr~4~ add~i3ob61 :..efia m~icb ~mid bs usd~ais~Q~e 4~eease at the prax4nsitq ct a~wtgag ~abooIIae 5. ~onsitoe coo~craia~. devb~o t~aiasto at sgd in cloee- prexiaitY to ~de nea:tsq imterseotlora9 of Baoa~rAnre~t~ Ball &!. ~nd tt~ali,d avo. sud 0a11 t3~. b. Th~ eaD,~ect p:spertq ia isdic~tad as l1-3 ~n s~~ f~ea~ral PYsa. ;, d imttar ~at $~y~osltinn aub~IIttad Aj t~e ~axarewe! T+oreat Cfvi~ ~saoas~tioa ond t~eo petit#on~ ot eypoaitlaa comtai~~ag t~a eiQ~atsrea o~ 6Fi resAdeat,s fa x~e are~ carra ~a~R~B~~~IED TF~.AT THE AP7AHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION HEREBY RECOMMENDS TO THE CITY COUNCIL OI~ THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT RECLA$BIFICATION h0. F- 60-61-~ tor R-3, PA?c~L °'A", 8~ aAPitCr'~m, ,sn~ I~«g PaF~L "R", Ee .A~E~Fti9V,~tDy; seab;act tn the~ f~lloarin~ aand4tiop~a, • -i- 1 t , -~ ,------_ _ --- !~ ~ ' (i1'., .; . .. . . , ~ . ~ _ '' , . t~ ~~~. - . ' -._ _-----'. '.,•+,. ' C w°C• . . . . . ~; . r ~ ~y . . . . . , }X.tS•~~, ! • COlF3 i~fig3~ ~06 i ' ~iaPi o: ~adSaste 5~:. ~4ra~ Cemteri.~a of 1~al2 ~i. (~l;! exiatl ~• ~ ; ..+ ~ ~eliaaP~ ~• fra~ Cemr,~rll.ne aiE i~tco~oil ~2't~i ~cise~ Y~aasz~ etsoot ~~qpYeve~~ ~piaas'aad ta~ts31 ~ll lm~x~tr~aenta i~ aceurdanam ~i~ ~ppao-ed etam@asd pl~c ; o~ tila~ fm atP~ae ~Y GitJ Es,~t~cer...tit~f ~~tA7~t. B~ ANfi 6f[~IS'."'aODi and ~.~ ~a~s ~r ~a.00 per Y'rant tooR foz r¢re~t li~btleg p~rposea o~ p0a'a g,P.~.s; ~~pfl. ~2. lBCi~s4ay tgme 1£m9i.o~ Steqos lCo. Slir:3;-'and 4. 3~ ~S~iasfas of aLandasd Bd~ deed r~mtricZia~~ pdp.A a b83qhY limitatfe~ to a~e stoay. 9~ Sab~issgoa o€ ploa e~a t~i3dfmg pi~ns to City Coa~of2 ior ~aeieer. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is s3giied and App:oved by oe this ., ~th de~y~of Novocbsr~ 1960. CAAIR1dIAN F.NAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: S~CRETAR'f ANqHEIM CIiF P7~ANNING COr~1MISSION STATE OF CAL3FORNIA ) COUNTY Or ORANGE ) ss. CIT`~' t)F ANAHEIM ) I• i Secretary of the City Planning Commission oP the City ~ of Anaheim~~ n~y certify that the foregoing RESOLUTION N0. `2~2-SERIES xq~~r, was passed and adopted at a Regular MeetY~~'e~t~'!}~a ~L~t}~' ~~Y~ Z'Zi~[m~ Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on the day of , by~the following vote of tha members thereof: 7th NPVRabOr 1~6Q i i AYES: COMMISSIONERS: .' . . :~:;'-~-': ~ :;Ai1re~;=: G~uor~ blaraawc, ~orris~ ~dungall~ ~ucrwera. NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NQ16@. ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ~9Qe• Cea~laeioce~r tisppoad aDmtained froa9 voting. IN 4GITNESS WHEREOF, I have herounto set my hand Lhis 7fih day ~f Npvem~aez, 1960. S~CR~SARY ANAH~IM CITY PLANNING C0IAMISSION _2 . ,,;~~, 'SOLUTION NO. 1!0 - SERIES A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PI~.NNING COMMISSION OF TF~E CITY OF ANAHEIM RECOMMENDING T0 THE CITY COUNCIL 0F THE CITY 0F ANAHEIM THAT RECLASSIFICATION NO. ~.C'-~i-~S ~-S. PARgEi. A, ~ APPrOVeD R-3, PARCSL B, EE ADPROVED W}*~,REAS, The City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim has received a Verified Petition from the property owner(s) of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as follows: PARCEL "A" The North 40~.00 feet of the Southwest quarter of ~ae Southres~ quar~e~ o: 'the Southeast quarter of Section 17, T~nship ~ South, Ran? i© West, in the Rancho Los Coyo%es, CLty of Anshelm, County of Orange, St@to of Cal~.orn]a, as per map recorded in Book 51 Page 10 of M£sce!lanoous ~aps, in the office of the County Recorder of sai~ County. PARCHL "B" The Sou±hwest quar%er of the Southwest quarter of the southeas~ quarter of Section 17, Township n South, Range 10 West, in-the Rancho Los Coyotes, City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as Der map recorded in Book 51 page i0 of Miscellaneous Maps, in the offLce of the County Recorder of said County. £XCHPT the North 408.00 feet thereof. nahe~m. California WKE1G~AS, The City ?Znnn~ng Commission did hold a Public Hearing at tho City Hall in ~he City of Anaheim upon sa~d V~I~IED PETITION of RECLASSIFICATION NO. ~-60-61-38 on the 7th day of November , 19 60, NOTICE of which said Public Hearing was duly given as required by law and the provisions of the A~NAHEIMMUNICIPAL CODE, Section 9200; and WHEREAS, Said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and studies made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said Hearings, does find and determine the following facts: ~etitioner requests ~ reclassification from ~-.I to ~-., on ~rcc] .1 (the norther/.- 408 ft. of subjcc~ proper~y) ~nd" ' . ' ~-~ on P~roe! B (~he southerly 22.1 ft. of subj pst 2roper%y) to permit development of multiple family residentio] 3ud ne~uhborhoo,J co.-anercial uses respectively. 2. ?e~i%ioncr is e.~andin~ the same type of development previously approved under Reclassification No. F-59-60~79 to their e~ster!v property linc rnther than the car!idr proposed north-south streets and lot sub'irt, sion. $. Subject property abuts R-1 on the north, ~-3 on the east, Trident Junior Hiuh School on the south across Bal! Road, and R-1 on the west across ~utwood, and is in proximity to Deuito Juarez Elementary School, St. Justin M~rtyr Elementary School, and Clnr;) barton Elementary School. Thc proposed commercial development, even if utilized for professions! offices, 9e additional traffic which would be undesirable because of the proximity of notate existin~ schools. 5. Extensive commercial develonment emists ~t and ~n close proximity t~ the nearby intersections of Brookhurs~d Ball Rd. and Euclid Ave. and Ball Rd. 6. The subject property is indicated as R-$ on thc General Plan. 7. A letter of opposition submitted by the Sherwood Forest Civic Association and t~o petitions cf opposition contoinin9 the signatures of 66 residents in the aren wcrc presented to the Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION HF-/IEBY RECOMMFiIDS TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY 0F ANAKEIM THAT RECLASSIFICATION NO. F-60-61-S$ for R-3, PARCEL "~". , B£ APPROVED, ~nd R-~ PARCSL "B",. E~ APPROWED, suoje~*~ ~:o the follov.'ing conditions: -1- 2ecord subdivision ..:ap; or Dedicate 53' £ror, Centerlinn of Bal_~ Kd. (30' ex,st), dcdicate '32¢ frnm Ce~terlino of Nu~wood (20' exist)~ prepare street improvement ;~lan' and ~nst~i] ~1 improvements in ascordance with approved standard t,l~ns ;;~ Yile in offic~ of City Engincer...ON BO~ BAI.I ROAD AND N~¥OOD. a,,d payment of $2.00 per fron~ foot for street'~ghtxr~g' ' purposes o~ B0~'H BALL ~- l%~;,~.0D.' "~ 2. l~O~ay ti,ne limit.on items No. ], 3'~ and 4. e. Submission of standarda-..," ~ deed restrictions with a height limitation to o~]e story. Submission of plot ~n,] buildinC plans to glty Co,.,nc~l P,r review. .......... bF m-~ this 7th da}, f b~ovember, 1960. TNE FOF~EGOING P~SOLUTION zs sismod rrna ,? ATTEST: S..C~.~_~Y ANANEII~ ~!T~~ STATE 0F C~IF0~IA ) C0~IY 0F 0~{GE ) ss. CITY 0F ~EILI ) I, JEAN PAGH, Sccrctary cf tho City Plaguing Commission of the City ef Anaheim, de hereby certify ~ha~ the foregoing RESOLUTION NO. ~iI0 - S~RIHS 1960-61 was Dassed and adoDted a~ a Regular Neeting of the City ?l~ing Commission ef the City of Anaheim, held on the ?th day ef Nova~ber , by ~he following vo~e of the members thereof: AYES: C0!.9~ISSIONERS: Allred~ Gaucr~ ~iarcoux, ~Iorris, ~,ungall, Summers. NOES: C0NNISSION~-~S: None. ABSENT: C0~IISSIONERS: None. Commissioner Ha?good abstained from voting. IN WITh'ESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 7th day of November, 1960. S,,.CF~E~£ A/iAMEik~ CITY/$L'ANNIHG C0~,:ISSION -2-