PC 1960-1961-118~ gEg~ 'dTION N0. ~~ - SERIES tc~Kt~._+4i ~'"~ "~~t ~i
,t" . f+ a~.f!+~'^7+~5.::~. . .
~L.. .. . ,,. . . . .
~'~ A RE50LUTION OF THE CITY PI,ANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
~'' fiaC3MMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT RECLASSIFICATION
f NO t.e~, ~.t~x~ ~~' r~NL~. -
r
, f
` ~ WHEREAS, The City Plaaziing Commission of the City of Anaheim has received
f
l a Verified Petition from the property owner(s) of certain real property situated
, in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as follows:
~.OL ;i0, 3~ ~ZSGS. ~2~~
I Cvi^k~lij
i~dF. tCC2AKER
S+'~35 L"ar-Sg L:or~ica
~ IIsst~rly iii11~~ C~1if.
..
d,Cr~~'7i
Dx. Car1 Y~. E;eut~ISn
2pT ~. ktaAn
~gnt8 ~n~. Cr~ 21 f .
WHEREAS, The City Planning Comtnission did hold a Public Hearing at the
City Hall in the City of Anaheim upon said VFRIFIED PETITION of RECI~ASSIFICATION
Public ~'~'r~z~~was duly ~i~}endas requ~~~~~law~and ~e provisionsWOfCtheaid
ANAHEIM MUNICIPAI, CODE, Section 9200; and
WHEREAS, Said Conmission, aPter due inspection, investigation and studies
made by itself and in its behalf, and after due cottsideration of all evidenca
and reports o~Pfered at said Hearings, does find and determine the following facts:
3. ?et3Cioaax saq~b$4~ aeoiasa~iiaatfote af ~~jac4 psapeatq 8'rom ~-1 io G-1, li~itad
2a pau~s+sgto~asP o8Slc~ a~~, S~ ard~r ta mti34se e~~t~ng aesi~en~¢cr ~or p~ro4esaio~~1 .
af fl ce~.
2. 3'hss y-!saat~ticg of sta~-,~ast pot~8iwd meawld eG~~rti~a~tQ as enaxosaAxaaaat af ~•2 ~~Ae ~-1
~B~W~~~i~~ B~Qa . - .
3. +1 latiqs Qf oysp+a+~iif~~a togeeh+ar mri[tD: vurbal opp4sitioa, ~ss recordac4 ar~al~st the
~uh~e~t pasitioa for reel~~att;isaLian.
4. I~ acaoxdsneo ai4,~t ~do daaSel of ~sris~eca t~a. b71~, ,9~e6ciutxoa 3fi70, oa flea. il, 1+~6~
tha su~c~ poti~lu~ tor retao~s.tfiCaei~n Sg ~3@~aS poteat3a~lly doSrfanea~aa Qo tb~e
aarranttdia~ res4d~s4qa~ aYe.a.
{
~. . ~~
~ -- -
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RiSOI,VED THAT THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
HEP,EBY RECOMM~NDS TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT RECT,ASSIFICATION
NO. F- ' • -
60~6i-3$ ~'t~r; .G-2~ : trl~Ei~~H7L'~ta CCahLt~l3GTAL, ba ~k"HIE~.
-1-
.,\ __ , -_~__'. __. ~T.'
'
/ ~ ' '
.~
THE P'OREGOING RESOI,UTION is signod and approved Uy me this 7~h day Of t~OV8~170s~ Z$b0. ~
CHAIRMAN ANAHEI64 CITY PLANNINQ COMMISSION
ATTEST:
SECRETARY AN9HEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City
of Anaheim,~~~h~~~~ certify that the foresoing fiESOLUTION N0. 2~~;~ ~y~ SM~iIE53
was passed and adopted at a Regular Mee
~r~ Commission of the City of Anaheim, hold on the ,~~~ day of ~e~~~r , 19~
by the following vote of the members thereoP:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ' r ' , ` ..~,t.
Allred, G~er, ~taASWud'; ~iaraoux, ~ :~orris,"'~augail, •'snd ~ 5aa~era
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOAb.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ~~0'
IN iNITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto sot my hand this pth day af tdQVOmB~er, 1460.
S~CRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING C01~t~SISSION
-2-
~;',:`.
f. ,.
!
l
F '9T,UTION NO. ~,~: - SERIES
A RESOLUTION OF TNE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIH
RECOMNENDING TO TME CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM TNAT RECLASSIFICATION
NO. 60-61-39- BE DENIED.
WNEREAS, The City Plmmning Commission of the City of Anaheim has received
a Verified Petition from the property owner(s) of certain real property situated
in the City of Anmheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as follows:
Lot No. 31 Tract 2299.
OWNER:
WM. KRAKER
9935 Santa Moni~a
Beverly Hills, Calif.
AGENT:
Dr. Carl E. Rome!in
207 S. Main
Santa Aha, Calif.
WHEREAS, The City Planning Commission did hold a Public Nearing at the
City Hall in the City of Anaheim upon said ¥~IFIED PETITION of RECLAS$IFICA2ION
NO. F- 60-61-39 on the 7th day of Novem£,er , 19 60, NOTICE of which said
Public Hearing was duly given as required by law and ~he provisions of the
ANANEIM MUNICIPAL CODE, Section 9200; and
WHEREAS, Said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and studies
made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence
and reports offered at said Nearings, does find and determine the following facts:
I. Petitioner requests reclassification of subject property from R-; ~o C-l, limited
to professional office use, in order to utilize existing residence for professiona;
offices.
2. The 9ranting of subject petition would constitute 8n encroachment of C-I into ~-]
residential area.
$. A letter of opposiZion, together with verbal opposition, was recorded ~uainst the
subject petition for reclassification.
4. In accordance with the denial of Variance No. 671, Resolution 3670, nn Dec. Il, lO56,
the su~ect petition for reclassification is deemed potentially detrimental to the
surro~'ndinu residential area.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT TREANANEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
HEREBY RECOMIF~.NDS TO TRE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT RECLASSIFICATION
NO. F- 60-61-39 for CUl, NEIG}~ORHOOD COMMERCIAL~ be DENIED.
-1-
TF~ FOEEGOI~:G RESOSUTIOH is signed and aDorove& ty m~ this 7th day of November, 1960~
C:I.Ii~L~2~ A~:AHEI~'~ CITY PL;-NNING
AiIEST:
SECF~ETARY AE~LqEI.q CITY P=ALJI:-C
STATE OF CALIFOP~NIA )
COUN~Y OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANANEI:,! )
I, JH~N PAC~, Secretary of tho City P!mn~ing Commission of the City
of Aris_helm, do hereby certify that tho foregoing RESOLUTION N0. ~ 118 - SHRI~$
1980-61 was Dassed and adopted at a Regular Meeting of ~he City
Planning Commission of %he City of Anaheim, held on the 7th day of November , 1960
by the following vote of %he members thereof:
AYES: CO~.~ISSI0!,"ERS: Allred, Gauer, H~pgeod~ ~rcoux, ~orri~,'~,~]l, ~n~ S,:mm.,ers.
NOES: C01~NISSlONERS: None.
ABSF2,~T: C0!,94ISSI01fERS: Nonc.
IN WITNESS %7~--aEOF. I have hereunto sot my hand this 7th day of' November, 1960.
S~P~E!~12t~3{Ei.V~ CITY~/ZAIii,:iNG CO.V2~ISSION
-2-