PC 1960-1961-119------- --. . - _.. ,. :.. , . ~~ ~~~~~., ,
. , i~S i ~}
~ ' fi'~)LUTION N0. S i D- SERIES 1W&n-s~' t• i~ L y
',~ ' - . , 3~?"t~,-.:~,`,.; ,
:; ,.
~ ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CIiX~P7~ANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEI1d
;i. RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OE THE CITY OF ANAi~IM THAT RECLASSIFICATION
No. ~{,a_,a ~ r~ ~a~n~+~n.
VIHEREAS, The City Planniag Commission oP the City of Anaheim has reoeived
a Verified Petition from the property owner(s) of certain real property situated
in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as Yollows:
Lot 31 af •~i~a Anaheia; Hac~e Trezt, Git~ af ~nahetms County af l~rango~ ~atate of
Cal~.f~rniu.
~tis
HAGF~t'L VAL~.~iZ~SL.A
~?0 ~I . CS tran
Arl~th~la~~ t;alii`orssia
A(~e~t~1T i
i~~IL~P H~ 5~t12ih ~
138p h. L~aa ~ingexes ~t.
An~h~eSu~, Calf farr+3o
WHEREAS, The City Planning Commission did hold a Public Hearing at the
City Hall in the City of Anaheim upon said VERIFIED PETITION of RECLASSIFICATION
N0. F' ~SttaFing~was duly givendas require~Q~y~~aw~and ~he provisiottsWOfc heflid
Public H8
ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE, Section 9200; and
WHEREAS, Said Commission, after due inspection, investigatioa and studies
msde by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence
and reports offered at said Hearings, does find and determine Lhe followiag faats:
1. Petitionar reqaeeta rmalassiffa~~io~ ct ~nb,~~a~ paoper3y Yrnffi it-S te- C-~ ia
ardor oa aassLsuat.otfl~~a £os l~gd3 serviaes.
2. ~~eaola~ioo o! I~tcmtc toa rsclss~lYLaatiao to Csl is pondt~ ou t6e ~rnpmrty
oae l02 zmrtb oF tbo ~uD~oat pgc-perty.
9. ~,~oa~~ ~POparty ebntts Go~C T~onao su~ogs Honter 5trxeL on tb~ rrest, ~-g an
tbe ao;cLh~ h•1 m~z4 C•2 aazdee S~a St. o» tho eaSL emI co~esei~l os~ 6Ra s~pt34.
Q. i~ a~a ep,~a~red in oppualcfo~ to t~e ~etiti~~.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE ANAi~IM CITY PyAiJP1ING COMMISSI~ft
HEREBY RECOMMENDS TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT RECLASSIFICATION
N0. F-
b0-b1-40. #cc C-1~ t~EI~lfflti~i~L~D Ct~~~iCIAE., L+~ =A~!P.qG'!~L`~ subj~ra4 to t;Ae
i4tlowf~~ ~cpd,tFons=
-1-
~ :,;
' ~':.:
; - a _ ~ ;.
f,- -- - '„ .. ~ ~ '~'~ ~ i 5'da~' ~~ e1 I1rl~~.°'.n ~,1~5'1a.ilH,^.rY!~1$S~'~iWtY'~+X >;e.;,r x, .a~~/~.'.~. _. ._---- -- -
~ . ~ . . , . . }:t~~ ~ ~ ~ . .
!• At. •. . .Y 1~ . ~ . .~,' 1. 7 . .. .. .~.:~ .,.' ~ ... .. . . ~~ ... ~ .
,; 1 ' 0evega~a~ ~e~W-~tlelt~ ~tn .aa~r~saiae_ai~ t5a pAa~ pl.~s~ca ' ~, ,.~°,~
r ~, ~~a~tt~q et8ae tltl~e t~ t6s orerr~tm~rlg iimif ot ~m ~. i~~- is ~1 ~t. ~p wtdt-~
r , tr~ °~ ~~~°~~~ ~: +5~~ ~tzz~~.;F.o 66a~ ~sR ~t ~e!~
,. . ~: D6dl$OOt~~n ot .82 is. fi~, ~t0r~i~tw Af ~aaY` ~~~~OL.
_~ '~. ~~ma~t ~t ~.t~- pmr ireaa ~oot fo~ ao~et i~q~~l~0 p~spoao~ tor bot~ s~ ~ad
~' . d~s '.~re~=~. .
`~ ~. Ps~pa.s~tiori; a~ 8i~~ i~yrnv~a~t plea~ amd. f;~6a11~~len a~' ait io~sote~uta !A ~
~ ~xd~a- ~ith t~1e
*ppsosad ataadtxA plau~ o~ tEi~ is t~e etiiae og t~s ~ity
: ` - 6apl~r:
s: 6. 94 day tl~oe l.~fitut~le¢ oa Ita~ ~ tArosqh S: .
~: ~ ,
,
~ .
' ~ THE FOREGOING RESOLUTEOI~ is signod and approvo@ by mo this ~,~~ ~ay +~t ~I01~,e74bor~ ,~~?~
i ' ~
i';
CHAIP~rtAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
.. . ~.
i
~ ATTEST: •
E
SECItETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNIi.C COhUdISSION ,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
~ COUNTY OF ORAN4E ).ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
~
I, ~iReu Saoretary of the City Planning Commission of the City
oY Anaheim, ~'0"Tie~*oertify that the foregoing RESOLUI'ION N0. ~ ~~~
was passed and adopted at a Regular Meet~~~~'i~~ C~~~ ~•
~~g Commission oP'the City of An~heim, held on the 7#h day of ~Qyc~~ , 19 ~;.;
by the Yollowing vote of the members there~f:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ~iYred, 6aner9ti~p~oa~; f~+~o'~h~.~as~lay, iil~pe~~~~d..-Sla~sa.
NOES: COM1dISSIONERS: , ' ~. ~
l~~aW.
ASSENT:. COMMISSIONERS:
1VOt1@. •
IN wITNESS WHEREOF, I huve hereunto sot my hand this ~tk dsy ci Nava~aar,.19b0.
SECftETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
i
• ~
i
i. 2 ~1'
[
RESOLUTION NO. ]t9 - SERIES !g' '~1
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
RECOMMENDING TO TRE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT RECLASSIFICATION
NO. 60-§i-~0 BE APPROYED.
WHEREAS, The City ?l~nning Commission of the City of Anaheim has received
a Verified Petition from the property owner(s) of certain real property situated
in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as follows:
LOt $1 of the Anaheim Home Tracz~ City of Anaheim, County of Orange~ State of
California
OWNER:
RAC~L VATFNZUELA
220 N. Citron
Anaheim, California
AC~NT:
Walter E. Smith
1180 N. Los Angeles St.
Anaheim, California
W~EAS, The City Planning Commission did hold a Public Hearing at the
City Hall in the City of Anaheim upon said VERIFIED PETITION of RECLASSIFICATION
NO. F- 60-61-40 on the 7th day of November , 19 60, NOTICE of which said
Public Hearing was duly given as required by law and the provisions of the
ANANEIMMUNICIPAL CODE, Section 9200; and
WHEREAS, Said Commission, after due inspection, inves%igationand studies
made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence
and reports offered at said Hearings, does find and determine the following facts:
i. Petitioner requests reclassification of subject property from ~-~° to C-I in
order to construct offices for leoal services.
2. A Resolution of intent for reclassification to C-1 is pending on thc property
one lot north of the subject property.
3. Subject property sbutts Court House ~cross Homer Street on the wcst, ~-3 un
the north, P-~ and C-2 across Swan St. on the cast and commercial on th~ so~th.
d. No one appeared in opposition to thepeti~ion.
NOW, TNEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
HEREBY RECOMMENDS TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAKEIM THAT RECLASSIFICATION
NO, F-60-61-~0 for C-l, NEIGHBORHOOD C0~RCIAL, be ,~g~ROV5D, suoject %o the
following conditions:
-1-
I. Develops. eat subst.,.,...allv in accordance with the i)Io~ ;)Inns Fresented.
2. Gran~i~u of Zee ~it!e to ~he westerly half of Swan St. ~ic~ is 20 ft. in width
fro~ the centerline or the street to the City of Anaheim.
3. Dedication of 32 Ct. from centerli~e of }~ome~ Street.
· ff. [~ny~ent of $2.00 per fron~ foot for street lightln9 ~'urpescs for bo~h Swat~ and
Homer Streets.
5. Preparation of Stree~ ~mprovement plans and installation of 811 improve~ents in
~ccordance wigh the npt.,roved standar( Fl~ns o~ file in the office of the City
Engineer.
6. 90 day time limitation on Items 2 through 5.
~HE FOF~EGOII~.G P, MSOLUTigN is sisn'.;d c.n.i sp~:'ovc:~ by mo %his 7th day of November, 1~60.
I, JEAN PAGE, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City
of ~n~eim, do hereby certify that the foregoing RESOLUZION N0. ~D~~ 119 - SERIES
1960-61 was passed and adopted at a Regular Meeting of the City
Planning Commission of the City of iuaheim, held on the 7th day of November , 19 60
by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: C0~/ISSIONERS: Mired, Gauer, Hapgood,, Narcou~, ~orris, ~iun~al] am/ Summers.
NOES: C0~9~ISSI0r~ERS: None.
AESE!,;~: C0~-9,[ISSi0~'~"ERS: None.
IN WITNESS WHF~XEOF. i have hereunto sot ~-y h.~nd this 7th day of November, 1960.
~' ."~..~R~ ;..:;AHEi.:~ CI~PLI'M'~NI,_'iG C0~ilSSION
-2-