Loading...
PC 1960-1961-40k ~ ;. ~ FSOLUTION N0. -0t~ - SERIFsS #.9b '~2 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAIiEiM RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIJd THAT RECLASSIFICATION NO PrlSQ 6d ~ ~-A:a~i~{D~."„~ I WHEREAS, The City Planning Commission of the City of Anahaim has received A Verified Petition from the property owner(s) of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County oP Orange, State of California, described as Yollows: F.o4 1~9;;of 'Frae~E h^o. 2799. ia the t`lty of AaaheiA+. ~ovnty of qzapge. 5tate raf GaliEdTnia. as pes~mwaP =ecordod in book 93~ pages 33. S&. ~?, 38, 39 arui ~`of 5iisc811savoits Atap~. ix~ the offic~~of tt~~ caunty rccorctes of aaid caraa~y. • Ti~e Apglie8ttt~ FAYWE~@D S~'~ IS92 FZeaco~ AFraue Aa~aE~eie+, CoAifosai.$. I ~~F WHEREAS, The City Planning Commission did hold a Public Hearing at the ~ City Hall in the City of Anaheim upon said VERiFIED PETITION oP RECLASSIFICATION N0. F- on the day of , 19 , NOTICE of which said ~ ~ Public~~tr~ng was dulyx~~ven as req~~~~~~by law attd ~~e provisions of the ;y ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE, Section 9200; and ~ i 1 WHERr,l1S, Said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and studtes ~ made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evide~ce and reports offered at said Hearings, does find and determine the following Pacts: i. T"af.s iot tog~ther w3th 2~ to the nazth werc reccntiy coaaidnresd by th8 Fianm~g Co~rniadon for &-3 at[d reco~seaaded foz a~pis~'arraY. 2. Tha dati.riation of ~~iugle lo#, us~clatcd to ot4r~r camccarciai di~txicts eioulcS ~ eor~~t3tu@e spat ~owla~ acrl casid liuve m 4eDrec~nt3ng mff~cfi oA abatitin~ proper,ttQe. ~ I .~ .i ~ ,. `~ i i '_ '~i p~pw~ TAF.RF.Ff1RF.~ gg rT RESOLVED THAT THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COM?dISSION _' "` ~ HEREBY RECOMMENDS TO THE CITY COUNCII, OF TFIE CIiY OF ANAHEIM THA'1' ~L'i,i-SSIFICATICici ~ N0. B- ` 60-6Y-4 8H DffiOIED. ~ C•1. liElf~i60RF~ ~C~~BERCIAL. (~emtzisted !a i'sofc~sionai ~ officam). , . -1- -` i g F -~~J'1~w~M ~ :~ •~ ' ,~ ;~ : ' 4~ e THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this labt day qf Attgtist. 1960. ATTEST: CHAIRhiAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ,w t,~ `~,..`...~ ; I ~:` SECR~TARY ANAHEIM CITY P NING COMMISSION i ~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY Or ORANGE ) ss. ~ CITY OF ANAHr~IM ) ~ , I I, ~YCN4g~y tt Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City i of Anaheim, ~i~~ere~certify that the foregoing RESOLUTION N0. ~Q qp , C was passed and adopted at a Regular Meet3'ng~ C3~ S,E~txBS ~ P~3,$~~~ Commission of the City oP Anaheim, hald on the day of , 19 by the following vote oY the members thereof: ~4 ApguBt 60 I AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ~ Allred, DuBof~. Gauar~ Mascoux, A9~ner4aa, Muagal2 nnfl 3ua~ess ~ ~ NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ~ Nlone. ~ l I ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ~ HBD$OOd gi24 A70CT~l1. i ~ IN 49ITNESS YVHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this ~ lat dRq of Auguat, 1960. I - . .. _ ~ ~ ...~::~.:.,,~ . _. SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNIN~G~CO tISS ON ~~ _2_ ,.,•, Fy ;~. 1 t,' ''. NO. - SERIES A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF T['}E CITY OF ANAHEIM RECOMMENDING T0 THE CITY COUNCIL 0F THE CITY 0F ANANEII.'.. THAT ~CLASSIFICATION WHEREAS. The City Planning CommiSsion of the City of Anaheim has received a Verified Petition from the property owner(s) of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as follows: Lot lB9 of Tract No. 2779, in ~he City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State o£ California, as perl~.map recorded in book 92, pages 35, 36, 37, 38, 39 and 40 of Miscellaneous Maps, in the office of the county recorder of said county. The Appiicant~ RAYMOND SPEHAR 1532 Beacon Avenue Anaheim, California. WHEREAS, The City Planning Commission. did hold a Public Hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim upon said VERIFIED PETITION of RECLASSIFIOATION NO. F-6~61-9 on the 1st day of' August , 19 60, NOTICE of which said Public Hearing was duly given as required by law and %he provisions of tho ANAHEIM ~HJNICIP~b% CODE, Section 9200; and WHEREAS, Said Commission, afte~ due inspection, investigation and studies · made by itself and in its .behalf, and~after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said Hearings, does find. and determine the following facts: ~ 1. This lot together with lc~ to the north were recently considered by the Planning Commis~on for R-3 and recommended for approval!. 2. The deIin~tion of a single lot, unrelated to Other commercial districts would -condtitute spot' zoning and 'could~have a depreciating zffect on abutting' proper,~ies. NOW, THEREFORE, 'BE IT RESOLVED THAT1 THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSIOB HEREBY RECOM~ENDS TO THE CITY C,0UNCIL OF THE CITY OF~ ANAHEIM THA~ RECLASSIFICATION NO. F-60-61-9 B~ D~NI]~D, PORC 1, NEIGHBORHOOD CON~4~RCIAL~' ( Restricted to Professional offices) .. -1- THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 1st day of August, 1960. CHAIR}~N ANAHEIM CITY PL~NNING-C~MI~.~ ~.~ ATTEST: SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY P~M~NI~G STATE OF C~LLIFORNIA ) COUNTY 0F ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, RICH~ ~w.~SR Secretary of the City Planning Commission of ~he City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing RESOLUTION NO. ~ 40, S~IBS 1960-61 .was passed and adopted at a Regular Meeting of the City .............. Planning Commission of .the City of Anaheim, held on the 1st day of August , 19 60 by the following vote of the members thereof: ~ ~ 'AYES': COM~IISS!ONERS: ~lred, DuBois, Gauer, ~arcoux, Ma~erhan, ~ungall and Summers ~~ ,j~ NOES: CO~ISSIONERS: None. ' . ,IN WITNESS WHE~F, I have hereunto ses my hand tl~ts 1st da~ of August, 1960. oECNETARY ANAHEIM CI~Y~ PLA~NIN~-~0~3~ISSION --