PC 1960-1961-2331 ~~
~ ~ I l lt ~r
,' ~ ~ ~ ,' ~ . . ~~ ~ ~ ~ /4 .: ,.
~ 5" 3 ~
I 4
i ~ ' ;i.
~i. #1~' ~ i ~ i `., , )
RBSOLUTION NO 233, SHRIES 1960-E1
A RESOLUTION OP TF~ CITY PIANNING C0~lISSION OP THB CITY OP ANAHBIN
RHCQbQ~!ffiQDING TO THH CITY CffsJNCIL OP Tf~ ~ITY OP ANAN.BIlA THAT
PBTITION POR RBCIASSIPICATION N0. 60-61-81 BE~ GRAIdTAD,
~BAS, tYie City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive u verif3ed
Petition for Reclassification from Earl J, and Co:al H. Trasl:, 2258 Colechester, Apt. "A",
~ Anaheim, California, ~hvners; Kirk-Utterback Realty, Inc., ~21 ~outh Brookhurst Street,
Anaheim, California, Agent, ~roposing reclassification of the following described property:
I The north half of the north 198 feet of the south 483 feet of the south half of the
east half of the noriheast qvarter of the northwest quarter of Section .14, in Township
I 4.South, Range 11 West, in the Rancho Los Coyotes, City of Anaheim, as shown on a map thereof
recorded in book 51, page 11 of Miscellaneous Maps, records of said Orange County.
; and
WHgRBpS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the 2ity Hail in
the City of Anaheim on April 17, 1961 at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said
public hearing having been duly given as requ3red by]aw and in accordance xith the provi-
sions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.72, to hea= aad consider evidence for and
against said proposed reclassificatioa ana to iavestigate and make findings an1 recoamen-
dations in connection therewith; and
WHBRHA3, said Commission, after due inapection,invesLigation, and study made by it-
self and in its behalf, and after due c~~siderati.on of ail evidencF aad reporta offered
at said hearing, does find vnd determine the following facts:
' 1. That the peti•kioner propnses ~ reclassification of the above dQSCribed pro-
perty from the R-A, RBSIDHNTIAL AGRICULTURAL, ZONE to the R-3, MULTIPLB FAMILY RESIDHIvTIAL,
j ZONB. ,
! 2. That the proposed reclassification of subject property ~_ necesaar~ or
~ desirable for the orderly and proper development of the com~unity.
3, That the proposed reclassification of sub3ect property does properly
relate to the zones and their permitted uses locaily establiehed in close proxiaity to
subject progerty and to the zoaes and 4heir permitted uses genesr..lly eatabliahed lhrough-
out the community.
4. That the proposed reclassi.fication of subject property does requisE
'i dedication for and standard improvement of abutting stseeta becauae said propertq
~ does relate to and abut upon streets and b.ighways which are proposed to cazr~ the
i type and quant3ty of traffic, which will be generated by the peraitted uaea, in accord-
, ance with the circulation element of the Generai Plan.
5. That no one appeared in opposition to subject peti~ion.
R-1 -1
~
~
. .. ~
.
a ;
4 j
i ~ . ~
t z` .1 r~ ~
'. ' }
~ ~
' ` .~c t
- t
sr ' C
~ ~ti /~~ rr '"~`,
r f n . r ~
' ~~ ~ ~~f ~t ,f 1,}, J ;y~.
~
=~ ` 1 '
:.~§ 4~/.~..
;
1J ~
,l ~
`~ i
; i
I
I
~~ i
, ~i
~ ,
1
;
;~
-I
_J •
~~
NCIW, THBRHFORB, BE IT 1tESOLVBD that the Anaheim City Planszing Commission hereby
recommends to the City Council of the City of Anaheim that Petition for Reclassificat'on
No, 60-61-81 be approved and, by so doing, that Title 18-Zoning of the Anaheim
Municipal Code be amended to exclude the above described properfy from the R-A, RHSIDENZ:.9L
AGRICULTURAL zone and to incorporate said described Froperty in the ~-3, MULTlPi.B FAMILY
RESIDBNTIAL zone, upon the following conditions which are hereby found to be a neces-
sary prerequisite to the prcposed use of the subject property in order to preserve the
safety and general welfare of the Citizens of Anaheim;
1. Dedication of 45 feet from the mon~mented centerline o: Western Avenue C2b feet existing).
2. Preparation of street improvement plans artd izst311ation oi all improvements in
accordance with approved standard plaris on file in the office of the City Bngineer.
3, Payment of $2.00 per front foot for stree: lighting purposes.
4. Payment of $25.00 per dwelling unit Park and Recreation fee to be collected as part
of Building Permit.
5. Time limitation of 90 days for tlie accomplishment of 3tems No. 1, 2, 3 and 4.
6. Development substantially in accordance with plans submitted and dated April 17, 1961,
THS FORBGQING RBSOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 17th day of April, 1961.
,~r„~ ~° _'_`
CHAI ANAHHIM CITY PIANNZNG C0~9~fI "Y03~
{ AT7BST:
1
,
i
:,
, i
~
i
i
I
,~
.1
;
~
"i
~
- ~ I
" i I
!
i
i
i; ; i
~ ~
R 2-A -2"
, - - . - - -- __, 1'
~ w
SE TARY ANAHSIM C TY P ING C~IMIESION
S ATE OP CALI PQ~~1 ir- j
CQUNTY OP ORANGE ) ss.
CI'TY OF r1i1AHHIM )
T, J~ PAGB , Secretary of the City pianning Con~Assion of the City of
Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution wa~ pr~ssed and adoptec; a: a
mee~ing of the City Planning Coumiission of the City of Anaheim, 'neld on April 17, 1961
at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members theceof:
AYBS: ~4i~SYSSIONHRS: pilred, Gauex, Marcoux, Mosris, Mungall and Summers.
NOBS : CU14~SIS3IONHA5: None .
ABSBNT: CCIAASYSSI'd~ffiRS: Hapgood.
IN WI'iNBSS WHHRHOP, I have hereu~nto set my hand this 17th dap of April, 1961.
S8 y pNAHEIA! CITY P ING CQ~4tliIS9I0N
~; .