PC 1960-1961-244t ' ' ~~ ;+.;
K.~~~~.'~~~~~~~~~.
,~ ~; : , r
~.
~'` ~ ~
~
lia.SOLUTION N0. 244. SHRIHS 1960-61
'[; i
~t 1~ RBSOLUTIOiV Op THB CITY PIAT~~III4G CQi~lISSION OP 1~ CITY OF ANAHHI1d ,
' RBC~d~ING TO THH CITY ~WIVCIL OP 1!~ CITY OF ANAEiRIM THAT `
` RSTF.TION PQ.R RH~A333PICATION N0. 60-61-8b BS DBNIED.
~i
li
`• S~If~tBA3, the City Pianniag Commisaioa of the City of Anaheis did receive s Perified
~ Fetiti~n for Reclasaificatioa from L. P. and Bmma H. Nichols, H. K. Wilson, Harry Z, and
Marie J. Wilson and LeRoy J, and hlsrgery W. Kemp, Owners; 3alem Development Company, 12351
Westminster Avenue, Santa Ana, California, Agent, proposing reclassification of the follow-
ing described properties: legal descriptions on file in the office of the Planning Depart-
raent. ?;
: ~
fYf~RBA3, the City Pianning Comaisaion did hoid a p~eblic hearing a; the City Izall in
the :.itq of Anaheim on April 17, 1961 a# 2:00 o~clock P.K.~ aotice of said
public hearing having beea dulq given as required by~a~ aad i.n accordance xith ~he ~-zovi-
aions of the Anaheim Muaicipai Code, Chapter 18.72, to hear and consider evidence €or aad
against esid proposed reclasaification and to investigate aad mate f~.n8inga and recoa~en-
dations in connectiou therewith; and
Wt~RBAB, said Commiasion, after due iaspection~iavcotigation, aad atudq sade by it-
self and in its behalf, and after due coasi6eration of all evidence and reporta offered
at said heariag, does fiad and determine the following facts:
1. That the petitioner propoaes a reciasaification of the obove deacrit+ed pro-
perty from +•,he R-A, RBSIDHNTIAL AGRICULTURAL, ZONH to the R-3, MULTIPLH FAMILY RESIDBNxIAL,
ZONH.
2. That the proposed reciassific4tion of aub,~ec4 property no necesaary or
deairable for the orderly and proper developmeat of the comatunity.
3, T'~st the proposed reclassification of aub,~ect property does not properly
relate to the zoaea and their permitted uaea locally eatabiiahed in ciose p;:oxisit~ to
subject property and to the zones and their permitted uaes geaerailr eatabiiah~d thsouga-
out the community.
4, That the propoaed reciassificatioa of sub3ect properfiq doea not require
dedication for and standard improve~eat of abutting atreeto becsuee aaid propert~
doea .,ot relate to and abut upon atreets and highwaqa which are bmp;oved to carr~ the
tqpe and quantity of traffic, which wiii be generatcd bp the per~itted uaea. ia ~accord-
anc~ with the circulation element of the Generai pTan.
5• That a petition of opposition, containing 453 signatures, in addition to
verbal opposition~ was recorded against su~ject petition,
6. That the proposed reclassification of subject property is not compatiSle
with the existing single family residential development to the north of subject pro-
perty and an ample amount of multiple family residential development is located to the
east of subject property.
R-1
._..---, ----______. .. ___.
~~
-1-
._.__...- - -,-...__ _____ ----._.._---------- -
__.._._. _.. _ _.
. ~ -- .... _
~ ~ ,~,~ r 4~:4~
,~:~ r. ` ar{y~~:.,
' , ~ ~. ~ t,.;~ ~ j;
, r~,~, t;~~$~ `~ ax~
~; ; ~
} . , ~c.~ r ` •~a~ ' ~ ,` ,~ ~ '''~ '`~u ~ ';
~.. ~.+ .r. ~+s"$~;J~~,~ ~.~,
~ ,~i'' -
~~~;. ;;~ }
NGW, THBRBPQRB, HIi IT RH30LVED that tnc Anaheim City Planning Commi.asiom hereby
recommend:t to the City Council of the City of Aasl:e3m that Petition for Rec2flssifica#3.on
No, 60-6L-86 be denied and, by so doing, that Title 18-Zoning of the Anaheim
t~unicipal Code not L~e amended to exclude the above described psoperty from tlxe
R-A, Residential Agricultaral zone and to incorporate said described proFerty in the
R-3, Multiple Pamily Residential zone. ~
THS PORHGBING RB30LUT*~N is 3i~ned snd approved by me this 17th day of April, 1961.
ATTE$T:
~v
ARY A~IAHHIM C TY P ING CO~fMI3SI0N
~8'fATS OP CAI.IPQRNIL~ )
COUNTY OP ORANGB ) ss.
CITY OP ANAH~iIM )
~~'Z~/3~s~.t ~, i
CHAIRMAN ANAF~IM CITIt PLA[aiING C~41ISS
I, JBAN PAGS , 3ecretarq ~f 4he City Planning Commission of the City of
Anaheim, do hereby certifq that the foregoing reaolution vras passed and adopted at a
meet3:sg of the City Planning Commisaioa of the City of Ana.he9m~ heid on April 17, 1961
at 2:00 o'clock P.M „ by the following vote of the members thereof; ..,.o'•
... -'
AYB3; COMh[IS~YONEAB: Allred, Gauer, Marcoux, Mungall and Gummer~,
N0~.4: COM,MI3SIUNffit8: f4orris.
AB3BFIT: Ca+AlI3SIOt~RS: Hapgood.
IN WITNB3S Wf~tEOP, I have hereunto aet my hand this 17th day of n~r}1, ~961,
t
SBCRB'~' ANRHBIA! CI PL 3 CQ~FQlI3gI02?
.
L
R2-D
i
I
_ _ _ - _~_ ;^•.~
. .. .~=~!
-2-
' ~3
- ____..__.._ _ _ ~ ~
__. _~_... . ~
~,,
_. __ . i:
~ . . ... ,
~
~ ;~ ''~ ~
~ _ ,~
_.---
.y~i'~..~1;,..,:
t~ :.
.~ ... , ._ ...._. . ,_,... ... . ~ _ . ~ ._ ,., . . _ . _ _ . . , .
, r.....
;~-
~ ~,~:
"i..
~.
..:'
RESOL'JT'ION N0. 244, S&RIHS 1960-61
A RBSOLUIT6PI OF THB CITY PIANNitiG CQ19~tISS20N OP TI~ CITY OP ANAFffiI3[
RBC~Q~iDING TO THS CITY CUiJNCIL OP ~ CITY OP ANAk~III THAT
PBTZTION POR RBCIAS3IPICATION N0. 60-61-86 BE DHNIHD.
1l~tRA3, the City P1ann3ng Gomm3.saioa of bhe City of Anaheiw did rece3ve ~ oerified
Petition for Reclasaification from L. P. a^.d Bmma H. Nichols, H. F.. Wilson, Harry Z, and
Marie J. Wilson and LeRoy J, and Marger}• W. Kemp, Owners; 3alem Development Company, 12351
lVes:mi~ister Avenue, Santa Ana, C~lifornia, kgent, proposing reclassification of tiie follow-
ing described properties: legal descriptions on fil~ ir. the office of the Planning Depzrt-
ment.
: ~
MF~t80.3, the City Planni~g Commaiseioa dad hoid a public bearing at t:~e City Fiali in
the City of Anaheim on Apri] 17, 1961 at 2:00 o'cloct p.M., aotice of aaid
public hearing having been du].y gfven as required by]ax and in accordaase ri4h the provi-
sions of the Anah.eim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.72, to hear aad coneider evideace for and
against said proposed reclassification and to iav^stigate and mate findinga saQ recoauen-
dationa in connection therewith; and
~8A9, said Commiasion, after due inapection,iaveatigation~ and atudy aade by it-
self and ia its behalf, and. after due cons~.de=ation of $ll evideace and reporta oftered
at said hearing, doea find and determ:ne the foilow~.ng facts:
1. That the petitioaer pro~osea a reclassification of the above deacribed pro-
perty from tne R-A, RESIDHNTIAL AGRICULTURAL, ZONB to the R-3, MULTIPLB PAMILY RHSIDffidTIAL,
ZONH.
2. That the proposed xeciaeaifica±ior_ of aub3eet property ~ na , amcesaar~ or
deairable for the orderly and proper deve:opmeat of 23e community.
3. 11~at tLe proposed reclassificatiou of eub,~ect propzrty does aot properiy
rel~te to the zonea and their permitted uae~ localiy eatabiiahed in cioae proxiroit~ to
aub3ect property aa:l to the zoaes and the3r permiSted us~s ~enerally eatabiiahed through-
out the community.
4, That the propoaed reclasaification of aubjecti property Qoea not require
dedication for and standard imgrove~ent of abutting atrecfa becauae said propest~
do~ea nnr reis-te to and abut upon atreets and highwsya which areTmBb9 d to caxr~ the
type and quaatity of traffic, ~hich wiJ.l be generated -~y the ~~raitted usea, ia •accord-
ance with the circulation element of tb~ General Plan.
5. That a petition of opposition, containing 453 signatures, in addition to
verbal opposition~was recorded against subject petition.
6. That the proposed reclassi:ication oi subject property is not c:ompatible
with the existing single family residential development to the north of subject pro-
perF.y and an ample amount of multiple family residential deveiopment is located to the
east of subject property.
R-1
-a-
._.__.. ~ ..-
~
•l
: : r ,:
~~
t` ~
NON1, THHREPORB, ~H IT RBSOLVSD tha~ the Anaheim City Planni~g Commission hereby
recommends to the City Couacil of the Cit~ of AnahM~.that Petitioa for Reclaseifiea~tion
No. 60-61-86 be denied and, by ao doirig, that Title i~-,:o~in~¢ of the AaaPieim
Municipal ~ode not be amended to exclude the above descrlb~d propertq from the
R-A, Resident~ial Agricultural zoae sad to incorporate said described property in the
R-3, Multiple Family Residential zoae,
TT~ PORBGOING RHSOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 17th day of April, 1961,
ATT9ST:
v
ARY ANAHBIM C TY P ING CObAfISSION
.ATB OP ~RLIFQRNEA )
COUNTY OP ORANGB ) sa. •
CITY OP ANAHEIM )
CHAIRMAN At~TAi~IM CITY p~TANNING CQMhlIS.~^
I, JEAN PA~B , 3eeretary of the Citq Planning Commiasion nf the City of
Anaheim, do hereby certi£y that the foregoiag resolution was passed and adopted at a
meeting of 4he City Plannin~ Conmission of 4he City of Anaheim, held omm A~ril 17, 1961
at 2:00 o~clock P.M., by the foliowing vote of the members thereof; ,,,•r~-
.. . - ' ,.
...
~~: C(1~AtIS3IQNffit3: Allred, Gauer, Marcoux, Muugrlil and S:~mmera.
NOB3: CC~f1~II35I0N~t8; Morris,
AE~4BNT: CQMMI3SIOIVBRS: Hapgood.
IN WITNSSS WHHRBOP, I have herecato set my hand this 17th day of Apr~l, 1961,
t
~~
SBCAB pHAHfBIM CI1 PLk:1 iG COI~Q~lI$$ION
R2-D
-Z-
.f
_
]
i
~
i
1
I
t
~
;~
_ _._. ._ . _ ,~ .~~ _ ___
~ [ -- ---- (-- - -----~- ---~ _.. -- •------- -- -- - -- --• -- -_ «.. -- - • - - 'r.
~ .... _~ . : ^ .._..._._ .,- .
~-.___ - ~:„n . ~ ~~ ,.... .._.