PC 1960-1961-258r ~..
. ~
.::~~~'~ ~'--~.1-f. .
c~f
~~
sssor,vx~o~t rio. ass, 1960-61
A RBSOL~1TIQtd OP Tgffi CITY PIANSIIAFG CQtArlI&SI~T OP THS GITY ~~ 4.yAHEIM
THpT pBTI1"!UN POR VARIANCB N0. 1360 BB GRANTEU
1~iID~tBA3~ the City Planniag Com~aiaeion of the City of Aneheia did receive m verified
Petition for VariaaCe froa Theodore•B. Pish, 1234 Hast CentEr Street, Anaheim, California,
Owner
of cextaia resl prope:ty eituated ia t'he City of Anaheia~ County of Orange, SLste of
Csl3foraia, ae deacribed in 8xhibi.t "A" or ss followe: All that certain iand situated in
the State of Calitornia, Rancho San Juan Cajon de Santa Ana, County of Orange, City of
~naheim, described as follows: The easterly 165 feet of the southerly 352.97 feet of
the east half o£ the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of t he northwest quaster
of Section 16, Township 4 South, Range 10 West, as shown on a map recorded in Book 51,
page 10 of Miscellaneous Maps, records of Orange County, California, said land being
further described as thg east half of Lot 4 of Helen and Lynch's Addition to Anaheim, as
shown on a map recorded in Hook 442, page 188 of Deeds, records of Los Angeles County,
California. ' ; aad
6~"Fi5f1BA3; 4he Citq Plariaiag Commisaion did hold a pubiic hearing st the City Hall in
the City of Maheim~on May 15, 1961 at 2:00 o'clock P.Id., notice of said
public hearia~ heeing beea duiy given as required by]a~: and in accordaace with the provi-
eiona of th~ Anaheim Muaicipai Code, Chapter 18.68~ to heas and conaider evidence for and
againat~sa$d pr.oposed variaace and to inveatigate and mate findiage end recommeadetiona
ia conaectioa therewith; and
~BA3. oaid Commisaion~ after dme inapectioa, inveatigation,and atudq made by it-
eelf.and in ita behslf, and after due coasideration of aii evideuce and reporte offered
as said hearing, does find and•determine the foilowing facta:
•1. That the petitioner requeata a variance from the Anaheim Nunicipnl Codee
Sectian l8.32,060 to pe~mit the c~nstruct3on of a two story apartment development on a
parcel of property classified in the R-3, Multiple Pamily Residential, Zone within a
distance o~' 150 feet from property classified in the R A, Residential Agricultural, Zone.
2. That there are exce~tioaai or extraordiaary circumstancee or conditione
applicable to the property invoived or to the intended uae of th~e property thut do not
apply generelly to the property or cl~ae of uee ia the same v~.cinitq and zone~.
3. That the requeated variance ia necessary for the preeerva4ion aad ea,~ay~eat
of a eubstantial property right posaeoaed by other property ia the same viciaiLq and
aone, and den3ed to the propertq in queatioa. •
4. That the requeated varisace ~ill „ot be materisliy detrimental to the pubiic
weifare or in,~urious to the property or improvemente in 8uch vicinity and zone in tahich
the propertq ia located.
S. That the requeated variance will not adveraely affect the Compreheaeive
~
Generai P1.an,
6. That the subject property abuts the R-3, Multiple Family Reaidential, Zone on
the east and the C-3, Heavy Commercial, Zone on the north~ and that two-story R-3~ Multiy~ie
Pamily &esidential, development ia established across Pampas Lane to the south.
7. That no one appeared in opposition to subject petition and that one letter of
support k~as filed with the Commission.
V-1 -1-
--.~.--
~ `~ `~' '~ :~;
~
.,, . . .
. ,_ , , . ,_:~ ~ . ~. .,._:,....~x,~ .,, ..,._ . _~ ~.... .
_ ,..~~ ,. ,-,_<.., ~.._._ .,~~.._,...~.~...._,__...,~_...~....,ti.~..:..u r,._ ~.....,.,_ ~,. , ~.o..., ,.,~
~
~ Hv ~«± ,~,
~ ~/ ~' ~ P'.
~ 3 ~ ~'
NWf~ 1I~BRBPORB, ' SB ET RBSOa.YBD that the Anaheiai City Pias~£s~g C~amiasion h~reby
appsoves VARIANICB N0. 1360 ~ u~oa 4h~ fellorefag condi:iozas ~hic:i`
are hereby fouad to be a neceasury prerequiaite to 4he propoaed use of the aub3zc; yPb-
perty ia order 4o preaerve the safetp and generel xelfare ~f the CiLi~ceas of A~hein:
1. Development subatantially in accordance with plsns presented.
2. Installation of sidewalks on Pampas I.ane.
3, Payment of $2,00 per front foot for street iighting purposes.
4, Provision of utility easements along exterior boundzries as 3etermined by the
Director of Utilities,
Tf~ PatBGOING RBSOLUTI~i ia ai~ned aad approved by sc th3:s'S h day of May, 1961.
~1 ~~
~ '' i.G~.~
`V3CS CNA ANAfIDIN CIT3f pIJ-plilItiG COA4IISSION
AITBST:
~~L !>Y'r~-~
Y ANAF~IM CITY P ING C~4lISSIQN
8TR'fE OP CALI:~ORTiIA ) .
COUNTY OF ORNNGH ) sa.
CITY OP ANAHHIM ) ~
I, JHAN PAGB ~ S~cre4nry of the City Plannimg Co~isaion of the C3tq o;F
Aaaheim, do hereby certifq that the foregoiag resolution xas paesed and s4,~pted at a
neeting of the Citq Plaaning Co~i.saioa of the City of Aaahei~, heid on Mr;~ 'w, 1961
at 2:00 o'cloclc P,M., by the following vote of the ae~bera thereof:
AYB3: Ca-@lIS3I~IIDt3: Allred, Hapgood, Marcoux, Morris, 4`_~~all and Summers,
lIQB3: COtrAlI3SIOI~R3: None.
AB;~BA1T: OQ.~tI3SI~I~tg; Gauer.
IN WITI~3$ 1tHHBRSOP, I have hereunto aet ay hnad this 15th day of•May, 1961.
/~
S IM CITY P NG CqBlISS3QIV
';~
',4s.
-:t
_.t
;p
3
';
ti
~
,
VC?rA .,G_
RESOLUTION N0. 258