PC 1960-1961-278A RS90LUTI~i OP 1l9B CITY PI1lNiiING COP9SISSICt~i OF Tf~ CITY 0P ANAHSIM
THAT PBTITION PQR i-ARIANGB N0.1366 BB DHNIED
t~4ffii~A3, the City Planning Commisaioa of the City of Anaheim did receive a verified
petitioa for Variance froat William A. Behr~ke, 2156 South Harbor Bouievard, Anaheim,
California, Owner
of certain xeal property situated in the City of AnaP~eim, Couaty of Oraage~ State of
Calffornia~ as described ia ~hibit "A" or se foll~tvs;
!.~chibit "A" on file in the office of the Planning Department.
; and
WFIDRBA~, the Citq Planning Commisaion did hold a public heariag at the City Aali in
the City of Anaheim~oa May 29, 19E~1 at 2:O1.~ o'cloct P.~i., not3ce of said
public hearing having been duly given as required by7ax a»:t ia accordance wi4h the provi-
sions of the Anaheim N,unicipal Code, Chapter 18.68~ to hear and conaider evidence for aad
agaiast said proposed variance and to inveatigate asx8 make fiaclinga and recommenaaLions
in connection theiewith; aad
iVF~R&1S, said Commisaion, after due inepection, investigatioa,and atudq made by it-
aelf and in its behalf, and af~er.due conaideration of all evidence aad reporte offesed
as said hesring, does find aad determine the following facta:
•1. That the petitioner requesta a variance fron the Anaheim Municipal Code:
9ection 18.16.010 to permit light commezcial sales in a builcling propo3ed fo: construction
on subject property.
2, That there are no except3ozu~1 or extraordinary circumstances or conditioas
applicable to the property involved ~ir ~o #he intended uae of the property that do not
apply gene~ally to the propertq or class o£ uae in the saffie vicini4y and zone.
3, That the requested variance i5 nn+ neceasasy for the preaervation aad en3oyment
of a aubstantial oropagiq right poaseased Z~y other property i'a the same viciaifiy and
zone, and denied ta the propertq ia queation. •
4. That the.requested variaace wi11 be materialiq detrimentai to the public
cveifare or in,~uri'ous to.the property or improvemeats in such viciaity and zone in wh3.ch
the property~ia located.
g, That the proposed use of the proper4y is intended in c on,junction with Condi-
tional Use Permit No. 121. Therefore, the subject variance is committed to the actions ~
taken upon ~aid Conditional Use Permit application.
6. That no ome appeared in opposition tu sub,ject petiti.on. .
V-1 -1-
~:' ~ ~:;<
; _ , . ,.,.. .:. ,.. .
s,~:. __ -~- ---•--_._~,_
- . . .,.. -±,= . i ~ _-. . . .__ -----
~-: ,. -- ------
_ .
--_ -------- _ : _---- --- -
_ .. _
- .___..._~._____._ __.~---------.. --- . _ - - - - --
~: t
t,
~;
^
j :,., ..~ ~`~ ;~ '
~,
.
.
(:..
~
E NOW, TfiHRBPORH, BE IT ~tB.4ULVBD that the Maheim City Pianning Commission hezeby
denies VARIANCB N0. 1366 POdt PBRt~lISSION OP LIQiT COMMBRCI/~.L SALBS IN R BUILDING PROPOSBD
+ P~t CONSTRUCTION ON SUBJHCT PROPffi2TY on the basis of 4he aFo~rementioned findings.
i
j THE PORSGOING RB30LUTION is signed attd approved by me is 29t, day of May, 19GY,
I
i ~
I `if.C.., .~
IRMAN IM CITY P ING CQMIstI3 ION
• A1TE8T:~
~
3B Y ANAHgIDq CITY PLlNNI COh4AI33I0P1
STATB OP CALIPO~TIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGg ) 88.
CIT3t OP ANAHBIM )
I~ J~N PAGB , Secretary of the City Piawniag Commis::':;a of the City of
Anaheia~ do hereby certify that th~ foregoing resoiution was gassed and adopted at a
mee#ing of •~he C3ty Plaaaing Co~isaion of the City of Anaheim, held on May~ 29, 1961
at 2:00 o'Clock P,M„ by the foliowing vote of the membera thereof:
A`lB~a C~fI9SI018ffit8: Mazcoux, Morris~ Mungall, perry, Summers.
s". VC2-D
i
RHSOLUTION N0. 278
~
. _~
_'~ ~ ~
. . . . .. .. -. ~ . . ..re ~ . •
NQE3: CQ~4dI39I0iV$Rg; None,
AB3SI~1T: COh9MI99I0NN~t3: Allred, Cauez ~ Fiapgood.
IN WITNBS$ WHBRHOP~ I have heseunto aet mq hand this 29tih daq of May~ 1961.
SBCRB ~1NAI~IM CITY BIANN CUD4KIS3ION
~2_
r- ..__._.----_.__._~..._.._----~. .....--------~--
'. ..