PC 1960-1961-289
~ r ;~,_,,.....~~....,....,~.....,.....,_.,.~,._......_.,r.~.....~ ,.,, _. ....... .. _ _ ,.._..~ , ,.,<,. ~.. ,.,. ,. .,.~...~.~,,,_.~.. ~,.. ~,. _ .. .. _ .. . . . _.
~~
;~~a'
RBSOLiTTION N0. 289, SBRIBS 1960-61
A R830LUTI~T QF THB CITY. PIANNING CQPOdISSI@i OP THS CxTY OP AI~TAI~I3(
RHCQi~9~SBNDING TQ Tf~ CITY COUNCIL OP 1~ffi CITY QP ANA}~IM Tf1AT
PBT'ITT~I FOR FtBCIA33IPICATTQY N0. 80-61-102 BS QtANTBD
RfHHRHAS, the City ,~lanning Conim3.asian of the City af Anahei~ did receive a oexified
Petition for Reclassificatioa from ILUSSELL J. and MARy C. MURRAY, 922 North Alamo, Anaheim,
California~ Owners; John T, and Sf2via Callahan, 1014 Nar4h Alamo, Anaheim, California,
Agent, proposing reclassifica~ion of the following described property: ?egal descsi~tion
on file in 4he office af the Planning Department,
e ~~
~8A3, the Citp Planning Commisaion did hold a public hearia~g at the 8ity Hali in
the City of Anaheim on June 12, 1961 at 2:00 o~cfock P,M.~ aotice a£ amid
public hearing having been duiy given as required by]ax and ia accordance xith the g:ovi-
aions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.72, to hear and conaider evideace for and
against said proposed recl}asificatioa and to ia~estigate and make findiags and secommcu-
dationa in connectioa therewith; and
V7f~RBAB, said Commissioa, after due 3nspection,investigatioa, and study aade by it-
seif aad in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evideace aad reporta offered
at said hearing, does find aad detesmine the following facts:
1, That. the petitioner proposes a reclassification of the abo~e descril~ed pno-
perty from the R..1~ One Pamilq Resadential, Zone to the C-1, Ne3ghborhood Commercial,2one.
2. That the propoaed reclaesification of sub3ect property ~_ neceasar~ or
deairable for 4he orderiy aad proper development of the coemunity.
3, That 4he proposed reclassification of aub3ect propesty does p=operly
reiate to the zonea and their permitted uses locaily establis~ed in close proxisit~r to
a~tb3ect property and to the zones and their permitted uses generaliq eatabliahed through-
out the cac~tunity.
4. That ~hc proposefl reciassificatioa of sub3ect prqpertq dae~ not require
dedication for aad staneiard in~provement of abuttiag streets becauae said property
does relate to and abut upon streets and'high~vays whi,ch are imoroved to cazr~ the
tqpe and quantitq of traffic, svhich wi11 be generatefl by the permit4ed uses~ in •aecord-
ance with the circula4ioa eiemeat of the Geaeral Plaa,
, S. That.no one appeared in opposi~ion to subject petition.
~
a
R-1 ~
-1-
~
i.
1
;
{;:
... ,.-~:. .,:...,...._.....~,.,,___.
--- .__.'"..,.:~;
'r`
-
_ .`;~::
~.~
~:J
NOW, TfIBRBFORH, BB IT RESOLVHD that the Anaheim City Planniag Commission hereby
recoaunends to the City Council of the City of Anaheim that Petitiou for Reciassification
No,60~61-102 be approved and, by so doing, that TitYe 2.8-'r:c~~:i:~ of the Anaheim
Municipal Code be amended to exclude the above described pr~pcrt;.Y;~~n ihe R-1, One Pamily
Residen~ial zone and to incorporate aaid described property :ir, thP C?•r::. Neighborhoo3
Commercial zone, upon the following conditions which a•re iie~eby f~unc~ to be a neces-
sary prerequisite to the pronose~ use of the sabject property ir. J~d•:r to preserve the
safety and genera]. welfare of the Citizens of Anaheim;
1. Development arid provision of parking aies~ i~i accopd3nce with the details as outlined
oa Bxhibit'"A".
2. Inatallation of driveNay apions in accordance w3th the approved ~tandard plans on file
in the office o#' the City Hn$ineer.
3. Psovisiott of landscaped areas in accordawtce with the areas outlined on Hxhibit "A".
3aid landscaping to l~e subject to the approval by the Superintenlent of Parkway
Maitttenance.
4, Time limitation of ~3nety (90) days fos the accomplishment of Item Nos. 1, 2, and 3.
T!~ P(~3tBG0ING RBSOLUTION is signed and approved by me tY:is 12 h day of June, 1961.
CHAI ANAHHIM CITY PL4NNIN.^s C9A~MISSION
AITEST:
SH TARY APIAFIgIM CdTY P NING COA4Y(ISSION
OF CALIPORNIA )
OUNTY OP OREWGg. ? ss.
CITY OP ANAHEIM )
I~ •1~ PA~. , Secretary o€ the City planning •Commissi>>n of the Citq o£
,1naheim, do hereby certify that t;ie foregoing reaolution was passed and adopted at a
meetin~ of the City Plsiming Co@misaion of the City of Anaheim, held on June 12, 1961
at 2:00 o~clock P.M., by the followiag vote of the members thereuf;
A~~ CO[~4NISSIONBRS; A11red, Marcoux, Morris, Mungall, Perry, ylimmers,
NG`1S: CGY~4dISSI0NBR3: None.
AHSBNT: CQ~AlI3S.!~:~~R3: Chairman Gaues~ Hapgcod.
IN WITNBgg WHHRgOP, I have hereunto set my hand this 12th day of June, 1961.
.P~d.w./
SBQt$T~ pNpHBIM CI PIA NG C'~; dIu3IS,t{y~
%/
R~-~ -2--
R.BSOLL*i'ION N0. 2$9