PC 1960-1961-294,,
~> (_ ) ~~
.,.,
r,
RHSOLUTIOId N0. 294, SHRIHS 1460-61
A RHSOLUTI~t OP 1HH CITY PIANNING COA4AISSI~T OF TliB CITY OP AY~IiA
THAT PBTITION FQR VARIANCB N0. 1372 BB GRANTED
WFffitBA~, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a
petit~on for Variaace in3tiated iiy tfie CITY PIANNING COMMISSION, ~04 Bast Lincoln Avenue,
Anaheiin, California i
~: certain real Qroperty situated in tha City o€ Anaheim, Co~nty of Oran~e, State of
Ce'iifornia, as described ia Hxl~ibit "A" or as follows;Al1 that certain land situated in
the State of California, Rancho Saa Juan Cajon de S2rita Ana, Cou~lty of Orange, described ~
as follows: Parcel 1: I,ot 9 of Tract No. 498, Berger Hal~-ACres as shown on a map re-
corded in book 19, page 24 of Miscelluneous Maps, records of Orarige County, California. ;
Parcel 2:. An undivided.~interest in Lot 3 of Tract No. 498 Berger Half-Acres as shown on
a m2p recorded in book 19,.page 24 of ldiscellaneous Maps, recoids of Orange Couaty, Cali- i
fornia. Parcel 3: An undsvided one-twentieth interest in Lot 22 of Tract No. 498 Berger s
Ha1f Acres as shown on a map recorded in Book 19, page 24 of Miscellaneous Maps records of
Orange County,;California ; and '
Wf~ltBAS, the Ci4q Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hail in
the City of ~ao.heim oa June 26, 1901 at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said
public hea.ring i~aving been duly given as required by]aw and in accordanc~e with the provi-
sions of the l~naheim Municigal Code, Chapter 18.68, to hear nnd consider evidence for and
against said proposed var3ance and to investigate and make findiags and recommendations
in connection t~erewith; and
WI~ffiFtBAS, st.i~t Commissioa, af~ter due inspectina, iarestigatioa~aad study made by it-
/ self and in its bet-alf, and after due consideration of ali evideace and reports offered
as said hearing, does find and determiae the following facts:
1. That the petitioner reqnests a variance from the Anaheim Municipal Code:
Section 18 16.010 to permit the establisharent of an office in an existing residence, to
permit the outdoor stosage of equi.pment and vehicles, and to permit the maintenance and
repair of equipment and vehicies on the subject property.
2. That there"are exceptionaY or extraordinary cascumstaacea or conditions .
appiicable to the property involved or to the inteaded use af the property that do not
apply generaily to the property or class of use in 4he saa•~ vicinity an8 zone.
3. Thmt the requested variance is aecessary for the preaervatiaa and ea3oymeat
of a 8ubstantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and
zone, and denied #o the property in questioa. . •
4. That the sequested variance wi11 not be materially detriaental to the publ~c
welfare or injurious to tl~e property or improvemeats in e~sch viciniicy and zone in wh~.ch
the property is located.
5, That the reques4ed variance r~iil not adversely affect the Comprehensive
General PYan.
6. That the preparation of street improvement pian~ and installation of all im-
provements in accordance with fche approved standard plans on file in the office of the City
Hngineer is deemad to be unnecessary at the present time and shall not be necessary un4i1
the balance of the area is developed and improved.
7. That no one appeared in opposition to subject petition.
8. That the subject property is presently beiag-utilized for the requested uses.
v-~
-1-
_~_.__._ ._ ..._ }
-- -- -------~----,--------------------__ -- .._ _.-- ... __.
_~~ . , . . i_ ~ , ~ ~, . ,._ ' . - .__
~~a ~ ~, ~ ~ ,~x
,
N()Ni, 1IiSRB~ORH. 'SB IT RBSOLVHD that the Anaheim City Planu3ng Comm3asion hereby ~
apprones VARIANCH N0. 1372 , upon the following conditions which y
are herebp found ta be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the sub,ject pro- I
pertq in order to preserve the safety and gQneral aeifare of 4he Citizens of Anaheim; ~
I
1. Maintenance of the existing office in the existing residence on subject property, j
2. Location of the outdoor storage of equipment aad Vehicles shall be restricted to 1
~ the rear of the subject property. i
3. Location of the maintenance and repair operation for said equipment and vehicies
shal]t be restricted to the rear o£ ~he s~bject property.
4. Recordation of deed restrictions limiting use of subject property for a three (3)
year period of time fnr the purposes outlined in Condition Nos. 1, 2, and 3.
5, Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on Mountain View Avenue.
6. Time limitation of one hundred eighty C180) days for 1i~e accomplishment of Condition
No. 5 as required by Section 18.68.040 of the Anaheim Municipal ~ode.
Tf~ P~tBGOING RBSOLUTI~t is signed aad apy~roved by m~e this 26th day of June, 1y61.
VI AMAN AN CITY PLANHING C01MlI$SION
ATi89T:
SII Y ANAHBYM CITY IAiG CQ~4lISSSI0.*T
STATS OP CALIPORNIA ) •
COUNTY OP W2ANGB ) ss.
CITY OP ANAHEIM ) '
I, JBAN PAGH, , Secretary of the City Planaing Comniasioa of the City of
Anaheim, do heseby cer4ify that the foregoing resalution rras paased and adopted at a
meeting of the Ci~ty Planniag Comn3ssion of the City of Anaheia~ held on June 26, 1961
at 2:00 o'ciock P.M,~ by 4he foilowing vote of the mesbt;rs thereof:
pyBS; COMMI83I~Iffit3: Hapgood, Morris, Mungall, Pebley, Perry, Summers.
NOB3; CONASI3SI01~ffiEt3: None.
ABggN'p; OOi~AlI3SI~dIDt3: Alired, Gauer, Marcoux.
IN WIT2~SS ~.HQ.p, I have l~ereunto ae4 mq hand this 26th day of June, 1961.
v ~<.~
S Y A.WI~IM CITY 8 NG C069QI3SI~'I
VCZ-A 2~
RHSOLUTION N0. 294
~
1•
I
1
.
,-._.M.~.._ .~ __ ._~-____________._._r_~.~~--~._-._~__.__
,
~:i: _
~~ _~. ~ : . . ...._