PC 1960-1961-298.
}
~a ( ^,~
,y
yg i
'~ 1~ _ ~ ~.:'.
I ~ ~ ' ~.~ ~ ~ r
i . 1
~~ 1~ 5.~•~
.7
~ E
f
- `.A= 1
. , s / ~.. ..~
,/.,
~.:i'
. ~~ ``;~
RBSOLUTION N0. 298, 3BRIES 1960-61
A RH$OLUTIOt~t OP 1HB CITY PIANNING Ctl~lISSI~i OF 1~IB CIT'! OF ANAHBIt:
THAT PBTITION POR VARIANCE N0. 1373 BB GRANTED
1~i~3, the City Plaaning Commissioa of the City of Anaheim did receive a verified
Petition for Variance froa STANLBY BHLL, 2560 I,incoln Avenue, Anaheim, California, Agent
of certain r~al.property sit~~atr.d in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of
California, as deacribed in Bxhibit "A" or as follows: Hxhibit "A" on file in the office
of the Planning Departme~t.
; and
WF~tBA~', the City Ylanning Coamission dia hold a public hearing at the City Hali in
the City of Aaaheim oa June 26, 1961 at 2:00 o'cloct P.M., aotice of said
public hearing having been duly givea as required by]aw and.in ~ecordence with the provi-
aions of the Anaheim Muaicipal Code, Chap4er 18.68~ to hear and consider evidence fot and
against said proposed variance and to iavestigate and nate findinga and recommeadatioas
ia connection therewith; and
WF~1tBAS, said Commission~ after due inspection, investigatioa,and study made by it-
self and in ita~ behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence ana reports offered
as said hearing, does find and determine the followiag facta:
•1. That the petitioner requests a variance from the Anaheim Municipal Code:
9ec4ion 18.24,030 C~4-a and b) to permit the subdivision of sub,ject property into eleven (11)
lots each cont~;ining a minimum frontage of 60 feet, a minimum area of b~00~ square feet,
and a minimum lot area per dwelling unit of 6,000 square feet.
2. 3'hat there are exceptional or extraord3nary circumstances or conditions
sppiicable to the prop~rty iavolved or to the iatended uae of the property that do not
apply ger.erally to 4he property or class of uae:in the same vicinity aad zone.
3. That the requested variance is aecessary for the pseaervation r+nd ea3oyment
of a~abstantisY property right posaessed bq other propesty in the same vicinity and
zone, and d~nied to the property in question. •
4. That the requeated variance wi].1 not be materiallp detria!e*_+*sl ico the public
welfnre or injurious to the property or improvementa in auch vicinity and zone in which
the property is located.
5. That the requested variance will nat adversely affect the Comprehenaive
General Plan.
6. That the dimensiotts and area contained in the proposed lot subdivisions of
subject property are'comparable with the dimensions and area of lots in the siagle family
residential tracta abuttiag the sub3ect property on the north and east.
7. That the sub,',ect deve3opment will consist of eleven (il) singie faa.i.ly reaidences
containing from 1,400 to 1,550 square feei ~f living area and ranging in psice :;~m $20,000
to $22~000.
8. That no one appeared in opposition to subject petition.
~ V-1
~
_ _ , ---• -..,...,~_..---~'
-1-
r
~-._ ,_ ..~. -- . .
~
~
;
~
;
i
i
~
~
j
j
I
~
~` ,,,
' // ~ •./ 1 ~ l~
! ., ~ ! I
.~~ ~ ~~ r
/ ~ / ~ }
, /~ ~ • ~ ~. •
'` ~ ` ' •
r ~~ '~ 4
~ i . { ~ ,.:~.
/ ;~ !` ~' ~ 1 rl.
/
I
~~ / .~ „ a
:
~ t
',,~`. . ~ -'
~ -. , .:. _:,. ,~
.. ~ ,. . ~t-,.., .~ ...~.,..::~- . , ~.. ,..._ ,~, ,.,.,
4(. .. Y . . . .... .. . ... ., . _ .. . ..... .v ~........-...-.~.......n....~.....-e...d.w~..+~........«-.,,.~,.. ~_......
_ I I ~_J '~
}w .
NdW, 7:irffiRBPORB, 'B$ IT RHSOLVHD that the Anaheim City Planniag Commission hereby
approves YARIANCB N0. 1373 , upoa the following conditions which
~: are hereby found to be a neeessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the sub,~ect pro-
~r perty in order to preserve the safety and general trelfarP of the Citizens of Anaheim:
,F .
'r 1. Recordation of the Pinal Map of subje~t proper.ty.
::
~ 2. Subject to the reclassification of sub?,ect property to the R-1, One Pamily Residetttial,
!! Zone. •
3, Provision of a six (6) foot masonry waYi on the soutri aad west boundary lines of the
subject property where sub,~ect pzoperty abutis bhe C-1, Neighborhood Commercial, Zone.
4; Time limitation of one hundred eighty (180) days for the accomplishment of Item Nos.
1, 2, and 3 as requised by Section 18.64,040 of the Anahe~.m Municipal Code.
Tt~ PdtHGOING RBSOLUTIQN ia si~ned and approved by ~ie this
AT1B.4T:
~:..C~/t~ /
SB Y ANAHHIM CITY P ING CQ~GlISSI~f
STATB OP CALIPOFtNIA )
COUNTY OP ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OP ANAHHIM )
day of June, 1961,
I, J~N PAGB~ , Secretary of the City Planning Co~iasion of the City of
Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoina resoiutiaa was passed and adopted at a
meetiag of the City plarming Co~3.saion of the City of Anaheia, held on June 26, 1961
at 2:00 o~cloct P.M., bq the f.ollowing wte of the aeabers thereof:
AYB9: CQa4fIS3I~1ffit9: Hapgood, Morris,. Mungali~ Pebley, Perry, Summera.
NQB3: COt~AfI3SI0t~ffiRS: None,
AH9BNT: 001~41ISSIQNffit3: Alired, G~uer, Marcoux,
S
i~ IP1 WITNBS3 ~BOP, I have hereunto aet ay hand l:his 26th daq of June, 19u1. ~
•,
c
:; 7'
~j ~
~ +
t,~ SB Y ANAFffiIM CITY P/~ I3SI@1 `
-...,. . ~
~I
~ i
VC2rA . 2_ . ~
~ RHSOLUTION N0. 298
~
, `~}
~ .
. ___..._._.., . ....._._.._. .. _ . ... _ _ _. _ .. _ ~i
_
_ ____ . _.... _ .. ..
_ _.Y___.__._._ _.___
__ -_ :.., i ~
-- , -,c-- . ~, -
-- ~:~ , . £i