PC 1961-1962-108 \
~ ~~
!
~
~~
~
~
``
~ : ~
_
_
I
.~C ~
.y `
w . ~
4 ~~. r'`'' 3d~
~ ~ ~f
T=.
RSSOLUTION N0. 108. SHRISS 1961-62
~;;;
~~ A RBSOIATION OP 1I~ffi CITY PIANNING COD9~4ISSION OP THB CITY OP AN:aHBIM
;_;,~'~ THAT PHTITION POR VARIANCB NO 1408 HH GRANTSD -
~• WH~tBAS, the City Plann3ng Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a verified
~;3~ Pe4ition for Variance from JOHN D. MITCHELL, 701 South Dover Street, Anaheim, California,
c~a~ Owner
of ce=tain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of
~ Cali£ornia, as described in Hxhibit "A" or as follows: Lot No. 87, Tract No. 2205, and
further described as 701 South Dover Street
; and
~S, the City :lanning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in
tfie City of Anaheim on October 16, 1961, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said
public hearing having been duly given as required by]aw aad ia accordance with the provi-
sions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.68, to hear and consider evidence for and
against said proposed variance and to iavestigate and make findings aad recommendations
in connection therewith; and
WHH1tBAS, said ^~mmission, after due inspection, iavestigatioa,and study made by it-
self and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offexed -
as said hearing, does find and determie~e the following facts:
1, That the petitior.er zequests a variance from the r~aheim Municipnl Code;
3eCtion 18.24.030 (3) to permit an encroachment of twenty (20) feet into the
required twenty-five (251 foot rear yard of sub,ject property in order to . ;
permit the addition of a family room to an existing residence on sub~ect ,,,,'',
property.
.,
2. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or cauditions .
applicable to the proper~y involved or to the inteuded use of the property that do not
apply generally to the propsrty or class of use ia the sa~e vicinitq and zone.
3. That the sequested variance is necessary for the preservatioa and ea,~oymeat
of a~ubatantibl property right possessed by other property in the sam~ vicinity and
zone, and denied to the property in q~estion.
4, That the requested variance wiii not be materiallq detrimental to the pubiic
welfare or in;urious to khe property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which
the property is lc:ated.
5. That the re~~aested variance will not adversely affect #he Comprehensive
General Plan. ~
6. That no one appeared in opposition to sub~ect petition.
, ,
J' b ~
~ ~~:~.~:~.~_
.,
~~~~
~:~
NC~tl. ~PQRB, BB IT RPSOLVSD that the Aaaheim City IPlsaniag Conmiasioa hereby
approves ~ariance No. 14os , ypon 4he folloxing conditiona which
are hereby found to be e aeceasary prerequ3ei.4e 40 4he propoaed use af the aub3ect pro-
perty in order ta preaerve the eafety and general ~ifare of the Citixena of Aasheim;
1. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit No, 1.
THB P~tHGOING RS30LUTI@I 18 ai~nCd e•ad approVed by se t h i s 16 t h d a y o f O c t o b e r, 19 61.
}
~~ .~~1,~/Ll~-P/ ~c .~t? /Q~~~~/
. CHAI1tMAN ADIAl~YD[ CIT9f pIANNING COA4lI8S ON ,~
ATIDST: ~i/ ~
t n ~~ ~
s oP cnr.t~trtrn ) v
o~ a~nx~a ) ag.
CITY OP ANAfIDIM )
Ie JEAN PAGE , 9eeretary of the Ci4y Piaaning Co~iesion of ~he City of
Ana?seim, do hereby certify that 4he foreQoing rraolution aae paeaed mnd a~dopted r~t a
aeeting of the City Plann3ng Com3~aioa of the City of Aaaheim~ held on October 16, 1ss1,
at 2:00 o~cioct P,ll., by the foiioa-iag vo4e of the me~bers thereof:
AYES: COa@lI83ION~t3: Allred, Gauer, Hapgood, Marcoux, Mungall, pebley,
Summers.
NOS.4: CdP4l.i3SYQAI6R3: None
ABSBNT: 00~14tI35I~iffitg: Morris, perry,
`•' IN MITBIDS3 iWfiBRHtlP ~ I hsve heteuIIto 8et my htnQ t h i s 16 t h d a y o f Oc t o b e r, 19 61 .
,'~
~f~ i
~' --m- ~~~' ~~ ~I P Ie:: C('/Qi18SI0N
VC2rA
}:
RHSOLUTION N0. 108
~. -- _.. ~"'.:~ •
°Z-
__.. . ._.._._.__ .--..._._. .._..._..__ ._ ,.. _ _._..._. ..._._..----_ - «
__ _. _
:,z
~ f~ . ..._....._... . _
'I
~
;
{